Hexagon RDF: Replace function template (plus explicit specializations) with non-template overloads
For the design in question, overloads seem to be a much simpler and less subtle solution.
This removes ODR issues, and errors of the kind where code that uses the
specialization in question will accidentally and erroneously specialize
the primary template. This only "works" by accident; the program is
ill-formed NDR.
(Found with -Wundefined-func-template.)
Patch by Thomas Köppe!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58998
llvm-svn: 355880
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Target/Hexagon/RDFGraph.cpp b/llvm/lib/Target/Hexagon/RDFGraph.cpp
index 18ceef5..9d8f706 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Target/Hexagon/RDFGraph.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Target/Hexagon/RDFGraph.cpp
@@ -54,7 +54,6 @@
return OS;
}
-template<>
raw_ostream &operator<< (raw_ostream &OS, const Print<RegisterRef> &P) {
auto &TRI = P.G.getTRI();
if (P.Obj.Reg > 0 && P.Obj.Reg < TRI.getNumRegs())
@@ -65,7 +64,6 @@
return OS;
}
-template<>
raw_ostream &operator<< (raw_ostream &OS, const Print<NodeId> &P) {
auto NA = P.G.addr<NodeBase*>(P.Obj);
uint16_t Attrs = NA.Addr->getAttrs();
@@ -115,7 +113,6 @@
OS << '!';
}
-template<>
raw_ostream &operator<< (raw_ostream &OS, const Print<NodeAddr<DefNode*>> &P) {
printRefHeader(OS, P.Obj, P.G);
OS << '(';
@@ -133,7 +130,6 @@
return OS;
}
-template<>
raw_ostream &operator<< (raw_ostream &OS, const Print<NodeAddr<UseNode*>> &P) {
printRefHeader(OS, P.Obj, P.G);
OS << '(';
@@ -145,7 +141,6 @@
return OS;
}
-template<>
raw_ostream &operator<< (raw_ostream &OS,
const Print<NodeAddr<PhiUseNode*>> &P) {
printRefHeader(OS, P.Obj, P.G);
@@ -161,7 +156,6 @@
return OS;
}
-template<>
raw_ostream &operator<< (raw_ostream &OS, const Print<NodeAddr<RefNode*>> &P) {
switch (P.Obj.Addr->getKind()) {
case NodeAttrs::Def:
@@ -177,7 +171,6 @@
return OS;
}
-template<>
raw_ostream &operator<< (raw_ostream &OS, const Print<NodeList> &P) {
unsigned N = P.Obj.size();
for (auto I : P.Obj) {
@@ -188,7 +181,6 @@
return OS;
}
-template<>
raw_ostream &operator<< (raw_ostream &OS, const Print<NodeSet> &P) {
unsigned N = P.Obj.size();
for (auto I : P.Obj) {
@@ -223,16 +215,13 @@
} // end anonymous namespace
-template<>
raw_ostream &operator<< (raw_ostream &OS, const Print<NodeAddr<PhiNode*>> &P) {
OS << Print<NodeId>(P.Obj.Id, P.G) << ": phi ["
<< PrintListV<RefNode*>(P.Obj.Addr->members(P.G), P.G) << ']';
return OS;
}
-template<>
-raw_ostream &operator<< (raw_ostream &OS,
- const Print<NodeAddr<StmtNode*>> &P) {
+raw_ostream &operator<<(raw_ostream &OS, const Print<NodeAddr<StmtNode *>> &P) {
const MachineInstr &MI = *P.Obj.Addr->getCode();
unsigned Opc = MI.getOpcode();
OS << Print<NodeId>(P.Obj.Id, P.G) << ": " << P.G.getTII().getName(Opc);
@@ -257,7 +246,6 @@
return OS;
}
-template<>
raw_ostream &operator<< (raw_ostream &OS,
const Print<NodeAddr<InstrNode*>> &P) {
switch (P.Obj.Addr->getKind()) {
@@ -274,7 +262,6 @@
return OS;
}
-template<>
raw_ostream &operator<< (raw_ostream &OS,
const Print<NodeAddr<BlockNode*>> &P) {
MachineBasicBlock *BB = P.Obj.Addr->getCode();
@@ -308,9 +295,7 @@
return OS;
}
-template<>
-raw_ostream &operator<< (raw_ostream &OS,
- const Print<NodeAddr<FuncNode*>> &P) {
+raw_ostream &operator<<(raw_ostream &OS, const Print<NodeAddr<FuncNode *>> &P) {
OS << "DFG dump:[\n" << Print<NodeId>(P.Obj.Id, P.G) << ": Function: "
<< P.Obj.Addr->getCode()->getName() << '\n';
for (auto I : P.Obj.Addr->members(P.G))
@@ -319,7 +304,6 @@
return OS;
}
-template<>
raw_ostream &operator<< (raw_ostream &OS, const Print<RegisterSet> &P) {
OS << '{';
for (auto I : P.Obj)
@@ -328,13 +312,11 @@
return OS;
}
-template<>
raw_ostream &operator<< (raw_ostream &OS, const Print<RegisterAggr> &P) {
P.Obj.print(OS);
return OS;
}
-template<>
raw_ostream &operator<< (raw_ostream &OS,
const Print<DataFlowGraph::DefStack> &P) {
for (auto I = P.Obj.top(), E = P.Obj.bottom(); I != E; ) {