Fix some confusing diagnostic wording. s/implicit default/implicit/ if we're
not actually talking about a default constructor.
llvm-svn: 183885
diff --git a/clang/test/CXX/class.access/p4.cpp b/clang/test/CXX/class.access/p4.cpp
index 5ad738b..0564a52 100644
--- a/clang/test/CXX/class.access/p4.cpp
+++ b/clang/test/CXX/class.access/p4.cpp
@@ -151,7 +151,7 @@
virtual Base3
{};
Derived3 d3; // expected-note {{implicit default constructor}}\
- // expected-note{{implicit default destructor}}}
+ // expected-note{{implicit destructor}}}
}
// Conversion functions.
@@ -207,13 +207,13 @@
class Test1 { A a; }; // expected-error {{private member}}
void test1() {
Test1 a;
- a = Test1(); // expected-note{{implicit default copy}}
+ a = Test1(); // expected-note{{implicit copy}}
}
class Test2 : A {}; // expected-error {{private member}}
void test2() {
Test2 a;
- a = Test2(); // expected-note{{implicit default copy}}
+ a = Test2(); // expected-note{{implicit copy}}
}
}
@@ -226,12 +226,12 @@
class Test1 { A a; }; // expected-error {{field of type 'test6::A' has private copy constructor}}
void test1(const Test1 &t) {
- Test1 a = t; // expected-note{{implicit default copy}}
+ Test1 a = t; // expected-note{{implicit copy}}
}
class Test2 : A {}; // expected-error {{base class 'test6::A' has private copy constructor}}
void test2(const Test2 &t) {
- Test2 a = t; // expected-note{{implicit default copy}}
+ Test2 a = t; // expected-note{{implicit copy}}
}
}