Fix some confusing diagnostic wording. s/implicit default/implicit/ if we're
not actually talking about a default constructor.
llvm-svn: 183885
diff --git a/clang/test/SemaCXX/virtual-member-functions-key-function.cpp b/clang/test/SemaCXX/virtual-member-functions-key-function.cpp
index 09a30b9..80ce029 100644
--- a/clang/test/SemaCXX/virtual-member-functions-key-function.cpp
+++ b/clang/test/SemaCXX/virtual-member-functions-key-function.cpp
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
};
struct B : A { // expected-error {{no suitable member 'operator delete' in 'B'}}
- B() { } // expected-note {{implicit default destructor for 'B' first required here}}
+ B() { } // expected-note {{implicit destructor for 'B' first required here}}
void operator delete(void *, int); // expected-note {{'operator delete' declared here}}
};
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@
void f() {
(void)new B;
- (void)new C; // expected-note {{implicit default destructor for 'C' first required here}}
+ (void)new C; // expected-note {{implicit destructor for 'C' first required here}}
}
// Make sure that the key-function computation is consistent when the