blob: 866cf64d2a1f965666d8bf569ea2725f589c4874 [file] [log] [blame]
Bjorn Pettersson7424c8c2016-11-02 08:55:19 +00001; RUN: opt < %s -reassociate -disable-output
2
3; It has been detected that dead loops like the one in this test case can be
4; created by -jump-threading (it was detected by a csmith generated program).
5;
6; According to -verify this is valid input (even if it could be discussed if
7; the dead loop really satisfies SSA form).
8;
9; The problem found was that the -reassociate pass ends up in an infinite loop
10; when analysing the 'deadloop1' basic block. See "Bugzilla - Bug 30818".
11define void @deadloop1() {
12 br label %endlabel
13
14deadloop1:
15 %1 = xor i32 %2, 7
16 %2 = xor i32 %1, 8
17 br label %deadloop1
18
19endlabel:
20 ret void
21}
22
23
24; Another example showing that dead code could result in infinite loops in
25; reassociate pass. See "Bugzilla - Bug 30818".
26define void @deadloop2() {
27 br label %endlabel
28
29deadloop2:
30 %1 = and i32 %2, 7
31 %2 = and i32 %3, 8
32 %3 = and i32 %1, 6
33 br label %deadloop2
34
35endlabel:
36 ret void
37}