Richard Smith | 7e801ca | 2020-10-13 19:14:13 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 1 | // RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple x86_64-linux -verify=norounding %s |
| 2 | // RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple x86_64-linux -verify=rounding %s -frounding-math |
| 3 | // rounding-no-diagnostics |
| 4 | |
| 5 | #define fold(x) (__builtin_constant_p(x) ? (x) : (x)) |
| 6 | |
| 7 | constexpr double a = 1.0 / 3.0; |
| 8 | |
| 9 | constexpr int f(int n) { return int(n * (1.0 / 3.0)); } |
| 10 | |
| 11 | using T = int[f(3)]; |
| 12 | using T = int[1]; |
| 13 | |
| 14 | enum Enum { enum_a = f(3) }; |
| 15 | |
| 16 | struct Bitfield { |
| 17 | unsigned int n : 1; |
| 18 | unsigned int m : f(3); |
| 19 | }; |
| 20 | |
| 21 | void f(Bitfield &b) { |
| 22 | b.n = int(6 * (1.0 / 3.0)); // norounding-warning {{changes value from 2 to 0}} |
| 23 | } |
| 24 | |
| 25 | const int k = 3 * (1.0 / 3.0); |
| 26 | static_assert(k == 1, ""); |
| 27 | |
| 28 | void g() { |
| 29 | // FIXME: Constant-evaluating this initializer is surprising, and violates |
| 30 | // the recommended practice in C++ [expr.const]p12: |
| 31 | // |
| 32 | // Implementations should provide consistent results of floating-point |
| 33 | // evaluations, irrespective of whether the evaluation is performed during |
| 34 | // translation or during program execution. |
| 35 | const int k = 3 * (1.0 / 3.0); |
| 36 | static_assert(k == 1, ""); |
| 37 | } |
| 38 | |
| 39 | int *h() { |
| 40 | return new int[int(-3 * (1.0 / 3.0))]; // norounding-error {{too large}} |
| 41 | } |