Gitiles
Code Review Sign In
gerrit-public.fairphone.software / toolchain / llvm-project / 3716c5df291464a994b57dcbafeda5650e9c72f8 / . / llvm / docs / FAQ.html
blob: b67fae3abe547d3d281e693f30b42f533a5d7667 [file] [log] [blame]
Misha Brukman6c91a332003-11-06 21:55:44 +0000[diff] [blame]1<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN"
2 "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">
3<html>
4<head>
5 <title>LLVM: Frequently Asked Questions</title>
Misha Brukman5363e382004-06-01 18:51:03 +0000[diff] [blame]6 <style type="text/css">
Misha Brukman6c91a332003-11-06 21:55:44 +0000[diff] [blame]7 @import url("llvm.css");
8 .question { font-weight: bold }
9 .answer { margin-left: 2em }
10 </style>
11</head>
12<body>
John Criswell8af73202003-10-13 16:13:06 +0000[diff] [blame]13
Misha Brukman6c91a332003-11-06 21:55:44 +0000[diff] [blame]14<div class="doc_title">
15 LLVM: Frequently Asked Questions
16</div>
17
18<ol>
19 <li><a href="#license">License</a>
20 <ol>
21 <li>Why are the LLVM source code and the front-end distributed under different
22 licenses?</li>
23 <li>Does the University of Illinois Open Source License really qualify as an
24 "open source" license?</li>
25 <li>Can I modify LLVM source code and redistribute the modified source?</li>
26 <li>Can I modify LLVM source code and redistribute binaries or other tools
27 based on it, without redistributing the source?</li>
28 </ol></li>
29
30 <li><a href="#source">Source code</a>
31 <ol>
32 <li>In what language is LLVM written?</li>
33 <li>How portable is the LLVM source code?</li>
34 </ol></li>
35
36 <li><a href="#build">Build Problems</a>
37 <ol>
38 <li>When I run configure, it finds the wrong C compiler.</li>
Misha Brukman6c91a332003-11-06 21:55:44 +0000[diff] [blame]39 <li>The <tt>configure</tt> script finds the right C compiler, but it uses the
40 LLVM linker from a previous build. What do I do?</li>
41 <li>When creating a dynamic library, I get a strange GLIBC error.</li>
42 <li>I've updated my source tree from CVS, and now my build is trying to use a
43 file/directory that doesn't exist.</li>
44 <li>I've modified a Makefile in my source tree, but my build tree keeps using
45 the old version. What do I do?</li>
46 <li>I've upgraded to a new version of LLVM, and I get strange build
47 errors.</li>
48 <li>I've built LLVM and am testing it, but the tests freeze.</li>
49 <li>Why do test results differ when I perform different types of builds?</li>
Chris Lattner5abdc6f2003-12-22 04:06:12 +0000[diff] [blame]50 <li>Compiling LLVM with GCC 3.3.2 fails, what should I do?</li>
John Criswellfa2f3682004-03-29 20:23:11 +0000[diff] [blame]51 <li>When I use the test suite, all of the C Backend tests fail. What is
52 wrong?</li>
Misha Brukman46572352004-09-09 16:36:47 +0000[diff] [blame]53 <li>After CVS update, rebuilding gives the error "No rule to make
54 target".</li>
Misha Brukman6c91a332003-11-06 21:55:44 +0000[diff] [blame]55 </ol></li>
John Criswell956cf452003-11-18 16:08:49 +0000[diff] [blame]56
Reid Spencer9aa244e2006-04-26 14:52:19 +0000[diff] [blame]57 <li><a href="#felangs">Source Languages</a>
58 <ol>
59 <li><a href="#langs">What source languages are supported?</a></li>
60 <li><a href="#langhlsupp">What support is there for higher level source
61 language constructs for building a compiler?</a></li>
Reid Spencer4bded9c2006-08-10 20:15:58 +0000[diff] [blame]62 <li><a href="GetElementPtr.html">I don't understand the GetElementPtr
63 instruction. Help!</a></li>
Reid Spencer9aa244e2006-04-26 14:52:19 +0000[diff] [blame]64 </ol>
65
Chris Lattner23353312003-11-19 05:53:12 +0000[diff] [blame]66 <li><a href="#cfe">Using the GCC Front End</a>
John Criswell956cf452003-11-18 16:08:49 +0000[diff] [blame]67 <ol>
68 <li>
69 When I compile software that uses a configure script, the configure script
70 thinks my system has all of the header files and libraries it is testing
71 for. How do I get configure to work correctly?
72 </li>
73
74 <li>
75 When I compile code using the LLVM GCC front end, it complains that it
Chris Lattner020e1fc2004-05-23 21:07:27 +0000[diff] [blame]76 cannot find libcrtend.a.
John Criswell956cf452003-11-18 16:08:49 +0000[diff] [blame]77 </li>
Tanya Lattneraf0ac272005-04-25 20:36:56 +0000[diff] [blame]78
79 <li>
80 How can I disable all optimizations when compiling code using the LLVM GCC front end?
81 </li>
82
Chris Lattner7b1d3c02006-07-19 18:19:59 +0000[diff] [blame]83 <li><a href="#translatec++">Can I use LLVM to convert C++ code to C code?</a></li>
84
John Criswell956cf452003-11-18 16:08:49 +0000[diff] [blame]85 </ol>
86 </li>
Chris Lattner23353312003-11-19 05:53:12 +0000[diff] [blame]87
88 <li><a href="#cfe_code">Questions about code generated by the GCC front-end</a>
89 <ol>
Chris Lattner37d55472005-02-25 20:30:21 +0000[diff] [blame]90 <li><a href="#__main">What is this <tt>__main()</tt> call that gets inserted into
91 <tt>main()</tt>?</a></li>
92 <li><a href="#iosinit">What is this <tt>llvm.global_ctors</tt> and
Chris Lattner87d6b402004-03-29 19:14:35 +0000[diff] [blame]93 <tt>_GLOBAL__I__tmp_webcompile...</tt> stuff that happens when I
Chris Lattner37d55472005-02-25 20:30:21 +0000[diff] [blame]94 #include &lt;iostream&gt;?</a></li>
95 <li><a href="#codedce">Where did all of my code go??</a></li>
96 <li><a href="#undef">What is this "<tt>undef</tt>" thing that shows up in my code?</a></li>
Chris Lattner23353312003-11-19 05:53:12 +0000[diff] [blame]97 </ol>
98 </li>
Misha Brukman6c91a332003-11-06 21:55:44 +0000[diff] [blame]99</ol>
100
Chris Lattner020e1fc2004-05-23 21:07:27 +0000[diff] [blame]101<div class="doc_author">
Reid Spencerca058542006-03-14 05:39:39 +0000[diff] [blame]102 <p>Written by <a href="http://llvm.org">The LLVM Team</a></p>
Chris Lattner020e1fc2004-05-23 21:07:27 +0000[diff] [blame]103</div>
104
105
Misha Brukman6c91a332003-11-06 21:55:44 +0000[diff] [blame]106<!-- *********************************************************************** -->
107<div class="doc_section">
108 <a name="license">License</a>
109</div>
110<!-- *********************************************************************** -->
111
112<div class="question">
113<p>Why are the LLVM source code and the front-end distributed under different
114licenses?</p>
115</div>
116
117<div class="answer">
118<p>The C/C++ front-ends are based on GCC and must be distributed under the GPL.
119Our aim is to distribute LLVM source code under a <em>much less restrictive</em>
120license, in particular one that does not compel users who distribute tools based
121on modifying the source to redistribute the modified source code as well.</p>
122</div>
123
124<div class="question">
125<p>Does the University of Illinois Open Source License really qualify as an
126"open source" license?</p>
127</div>
128
129<div class="answer">
130<p>Yes, the license is <a
131href="http://www.opensource.org/licenses/UoI-NCSA.php">certified</a> by the Open
132Source Initiative (OSI).</p>
133</div>
134
135<div class="question">
136<p>Can I modify LLVM source code and redistribute the modified source?</p>
137</div>
138
139<div class="answer">
140<p>Yes. The modified source distribution must retain the copyright notice and
141follow the three bulletted conditions listed in the <a
Reid Spencerca058542006-03-14 05:39:39 +0000[diff] [blame]142href="http://llvm.org/releases/1.3/LICENSE.TXT">LLVM license</a>.</p>
Misha Brukman6c91a332003-11-06 21:55:44 +0000[diff] [blame]143</div>
144
145<div class="question">
146<p>Can I modify LLVM source code and redistribute binaries or other tools based
147on it, without redistributing the source?</p>
148</div>
149
150<div class="answer">
151<p>Yes, this is why we distribute LLVM under a less restrictive license than
152GPL, as explained in the first question above.</p>
153</div>
154
155<!-- *********************************************************************** -->
156<div class="doc_section">
157 <a name="source">Source Code</a>
158</div>
159<!-- *********************************************************************** -->
160
161<div class="question">
162<p>In what language is LLVM written?</p>
163</div>
164
165<div class="answer">
166<p>All of the LLVM tools and libraries are written in C++ with extensive use of
167the STL.</p>
168</div>
169
170<div class="question">
171<p>How portable is the LLVM source code?</p>
172</div>
173
174<div class="answer">
175<p>The LLVM source code should be portable to most modern UNIX-like operating
176systems. Most of the code is written in standard C++ with operating system
177services abstracted to a support library. The tools required to build and test
178LLVM have been ported to a plethora of platforms.</p>
179
180<p>Some porting problems may exist in the following areas:</p>
181
182<ul>
183
184 <li>The GCC front end code is not as portable as the LLVM suite, so it may not
185 compile as well on unsupported platforms.</li>
186
Misha Brukman6c91a332003-11-06 21:55:44 +0000[diff] [blame]187 <li>The LLVM build system relies heavily on UNIX shell tools, like the Bourne
188 Shell and sed. Porting to systems without these tools (MacOS 9, Plan 9) will
189 require more effort.</li>
190
191</ul>
192
193</div>
194
195<!-- *********************************************************************** -->
196<div class="doc_section">
197 <a name="build">Build Problems</a>
198</div>
199<!-- *********************************************************************** -->
200
201<div class="question">
202<p>When I run configure, it finds the wrong C compiler.</p>
203</div>
204
205<div class="answer">
206
207<p>The <tt>configure</tt> script attempts to locate first <tt>gcc</tt> and then
208<tt>cc</tt>, unless it finds compiler paths set in <tt>CC</tt> and <tt>CXX</tt>
209for the C and C++ compiler, respectively.</p>
210
211<p>If <tt>configure</tt> finds the wrong compiler, either adjust your
212<tt>PATH</tt> environment variable or set <tt>CC</tt> and <tt>CXX</tt>
213explicitly.</p>
214
215</div>
216
217<div class="question">
Misha Brukman6c91a332003-11-06 21:55:44 +0000[diff] [blame]218<p>The <tt>configure</tt> script finds the right C compiler, but it uses the
219LLVM linker from a previous build. What do I do?</p>
220</div>
221
222<div class="answer">
223<p>The <tt>configure</tt> script uses the <tt>PATH</tt> to find executables, so
224if it's grabbing the wrong linker/assembler/etc, there are two ways to fix
225it:</p>
226
227<ol>
228
229 <li><p>Adjust your <tt>PATH</tt> environment variable so that the correct
230 program appears first in the <tt>PATH</tt>. This may work, but may not be
231 convenient when you want them <i>first</i> in your path for other
232 work.</p></li>
233
234 <li><p>Run <tt>configure</tt> with an alternative <tt>PATH</tt> that is
235 correct. In a Borne compatible shell, the syntax would be:</p>
236
Misha Brukman5363e382004-06-01 18:51:03 +0000[diff] [blame]237 <p><tt>PATH=[the path without the bad program] ./configure ...</tt></p>
Misha Brukman6c91a332003-11-06 21:55:44 +0000[diff] [blame]238
239 <p>This is still somewhat inconvenient, but it allows <tt>configure</tt>
240 to do its work without having to adjust your <tt>PATH</tt>
241 permanently.</p></li>
242
243</ol>
244
245</div>
246
247<div class="question">
248<p>When creating a dynamic library, I get a strange GLIBC error.</p>
249</div>
250
251<div class="answer">
252<p>Under some operating systems (i.e. Linux), libtool does not work correctly if
253GCC was compiled with the --disable-shared option. To work around this, install
254your own version of GCC that has shared libraries enabled by default.</p>
255</div>
256
257<div class="question">
258<p>I've updated my source tree from CVS, and now my build is trying to use a
259file/directory that doesn't exist.</p>
260</div>
261
262<div class="answer">
263<p>You need to re-run configure in your object directory. When new Makefiles
264are added to the source tree, they have to be copied over to the object tree in
265order to be used by the build.</p>
266</div>
267
268<div class="question">
269<p>I've modified a Makefile in my source tree, but my build tree keeps using the
270old version. What do I do?</p>
271</div>
272
273<div class="answer">
274
275<p>If the Makefile already exists in your object tree, you
276can just run the following command in the top level directory of your object
277tree:</p>
278
279<p><tt>./config.status &lt;relative path to Makefile&gt;</tt><p>
280
281<p>If the Makefile is new, you will have to modify the configure script to copy
282it over.</p>
283
284</div>
285
286<div class="question">
287<p>I've upgraded to a new version of LLVM, and I get strange build errors.</p>
288</div>
289
290<div class="answer">
291
292<p>Sometimes, changes to the LLVM source code alters how the build system works.
293Changes in libtool, autoconf, or header file dependencies are especially prone
294to this sort of problem.</p>
295
296<p>The best thing to try is to remove the old files and re-build. In most
297cases, this takes care of the problem. To do this, just type <tt>make
298clean</tt> and then <tt>make</tt> in the directory that fails to build.</p>
299
300</div>
301
302<div class="question">
303<p>I've built LLVM and am testing it, but the tests freeze.</p>
304</div>
305
306<div class="answer">
307
308<p>This is most likely occurring because you built a profile or release
309(optimized) build of LLVM and have not specified the same information on the
310<tt>gmake</tt> command line.</p>
311
312<p>For example, if you built LLVM with the command:</p>
313
314<p><tt>gmake ENABLE_PROFILING=1</tt>
315
316<p>...then you must run the tests with the following commands:</p>
317
318<p><tt>cd llvm/test<br>gmake ENABLE_PROFILING=1</tt></p>
319
320</div>
321
322<div class="question">
323<p>Why do test results differ when I perform different types of builds?</p>
324</div>
325
326<div class="answer">
327
328<p>The LLVM test suite is dependent upon several features of the LLVM tools and
329libraries.</p>
330
331<p>First, the debugging assertions in code are not enabled in optimized or
332profiling builds. Hence, tests that used to fail may pass.</p>
333
334<p>Second, some tests may rely upon debugging options or behavior that is only
335available in the debug build. These tests will fail in an optimized or profile
336build.</p>
337
338</div>
339
Chris Lattner408916b2003-12-08 05:43:19 +0000[diff] [blame]340<div class="question">
Chris Lattner5abdc6f2003-12-22 04:06:12 +0000[diff] [blame]341<p>Compiling LLVM with GCC 3.3.2 fails, what should I do?</p>
Chris Lattner408916b2003-12-08 05:43:19 +0000[diff] [blame]342</div>
343
344<div class="answer">
Chris Lattner5abdc6f2003-12-22 04:06:12 +0000[diff] [blame]345<p>This is <a href="http://gcc.gnu.org/PR?13392">a bug in GCC</a>, and
346 affects projects other than LLVM. Try upgrading or downgrading your GCC.</p>
Chris Lattner408916b2003-12-08 05:43:19 +0000[diff] [blame]347</div>
348
John Criswellfa2f3682004-03-29 20:23:11 +0000[diff] [blame]349<div class="question">
Misha Brukman46572352004-09-09 16:36:47 +0000[diff] [blame]350<p>After CVS update, rebuilding gives the error "No rule to make target".</p>
351</div>
352
353<div class="answer">
354<p>If the error is of the form:</p>
355
356<div class="doc_code">
357<tt>
358gmake[2]: *** No rule to make target `/path/to/somefile', needed by
359`/path/to/another/file.d'.<br>
360Stop.
361</tt>
362</div>
363
364<p>This may occur anytime files are moved within the CVS repository or removed
365entirely. In this case, the best solution is to erase all <tt>.d</tt> files,
366which list dependencies for source files, and rebuild:</p>
367
368<div class="doc_code">
369<pre>
370% cd $LLVM_OBJ_DIR
371% rm -f `find . -name \*\.d`
372% gmake
373</pre>
374</div>
375
376<p>In other cases, it may be necessary to run <tt>make clean</tt> before
377rebuilding.</p>
378</div>
379
Misha Brukman6c91a332003-11-06 21:55:44 +0000[diff] [blame]380<!-- *********************************************************************** -->
Reid Spencer4d3171f2006-04-26 15:46:53 +0000[diff] [blame]381<div class="doc_section"><a name="felangs">Source Languages</a></div>
Reid Spencer9aa244e2006-04-26 14:52:19 +0000[diff] [blame]382
Reid Spencer4d3171f2006-04-26 15:46:53 +0000[diff] [blame]383<div class="question"><p>
384 <a name="langs">What source languages are supported?</a></p>
385</div>
386<div class="answer">
Reid Spencer9aa244e2006-04-26 14:52:19 +0000[diff] [blame]387 <p>LLVM currently has full support for C and C++ source languages. These are
388 available through a special version of GCC that LLVM calls the
389 <a href="#cfe">C Front End</a></p>
390 <p>There is an incomplete version of a Java front end available in the
391 <tt>llvm-java</tt> CVS repository. There is no documentation on this yet so
392 you'll need to download the code, compile it, and try it.</p>
393 <p>In the <tt>examples/BFtoLLVM</tt> directory is a translator for the
394 BrainF*** language (2002 Language Specification).</p>
395 <p>In the <tt>projects/Stacker</tt> directory is a compiler and runtime
396 library for the Stacker language, a "toy" language loosely based on Forth.</p>
397 <p>The PyPy developers are working on integrating LLVM into the PyPy backend
398 so that PyPy language can translate to LLVM.</p>
399</div>
Reid Spencer4d3171f2006-04-26 15:46:53 +0000[diff] [blame]400<div class="question"><a name="langhlsupp">
Reid Spencer9aa244e2006-04-26 14:52:19 +0000[diff] [blame]401 <p>What support is there for a higher level source language constructs for
Reid Spencer4d3171f2006-04-26 15:46:53 +0000[diff] [blame]402 building a compiler?</a></p>
Reid Spencer9aa244e2006-04-26 14:52:19 +0000[diff] [blame]403</div>
404<div class="answer">
405 <p>Currently, there isn't much. LLVM supports an intermediate representation
406 which is useful for code representation but will not support the high level
407 (abstract syntax tree) representation needed by most compilers. There are no
Jeff Cohen027fbc22006-04-26 21:03:17 +0000[diff] [blame]408 facilities for lexical nor semantic analysis. There is, however, a <i>mostly
Reid Spencer9aa244e2006-04-26 14:52:19 +0000[diff] [blame]409 implemented</i> configuration-driven
410 <a href="CompilerDriver.html">compiler driver</a> which simplifies the task
411 of running optimizations, linking, and executable generation.</p>
Reid Spencer9aa244e2006-04-26 14:52:19 +0000[diff] [blame]412</div>
Chris Lattner667c9012006-08-15 00:43:35 +0000[diff] [blame]413
414<div class="question"><a name="langhlsupp">
415 <p>I don't understand the GetElementPtr
416 instruction. Help!</a></p>
417</div>
418<div class="answer">
419 <p>See <a href="GetElementPtr.html">The Often Misunderstood GEP
420 Instruction</a>.</li>
421</div>
422
Reid Spencer9aa244e2006-04-26 14:52:19 +0000[diff] [blame]423<!-- *********************************************************************** -->
424<div class="doc_section">
Chris Lattner23353312003-11-19 05:53:12 +0000[diff] [blame]425 <a name="cfe">Using the GCC Front End</a>
John Criswell5e0f07e2003-11-18 16:05:23 +0000[diff] [blame]426</div>
427
428<div class="question">
429<p>
430When I compile software that uses a configure script, the configure script
431thinks my system has all of the header files and libraries it is testing for.
432How do I get configure to work correctly?
433</p>
434</div>
435
436<div class="answer">
437<p>
438The configure script is getting things wrong because the LLVM linker allows
439symbols to be undefined at link time (so that they can be resolved during JIT
440or translation to the C back end). That is why configure thinks your system
441"has everything."
442</p>
443<p>
444To work around this, perform the following steps:
445</p>
John Criswell5e0f07e2003-11-18 16:05:23 +0000[diff] [blame]446<ol>
Reid Spencera7974cc2007-02-09 15:59:08 +0000[diff] [blame]447 <li>Make sure the CC and CXX environment variables contains the full path to
448 the LLVM GCC front end.</li>
John Criswell5e0f07e2003-11-18 16:05:23 +0000[diff] [blame]449
Reid Spencera7974cc2007-02-09 15:59:08 +0000[diff] [blame]450 <li>Make sure that the regular C compiler is first in your PATH. </li>
John Criswell5e0f07e2003-11-18 16:05:23 +0000[diff] [blame]451
Reid Spencera7974cc2007-02-09 15:59:08 +0000[diff] [blame]452 <li>Add the string "-Wl,-native" to your CFLAGS environment variable.</li>
John Criswell5e0f07e2003-11-18 16:05:23 +0000[diff] [blame]453</ol>
454
455<p>
Reid Spencera7974cc2007-02-09 15:59:08 +0000[diff] [blame]456This will allow the <tt>llvm-ld</tt> linker to create a native code executable
457instead of shell script that runs the JIT. Creating native code requires
458standard linkage, which in turn will allow the configure script to find out if
459code is not linking on your system because the feature isn't available on your
460system.</p>
John Criswell5e0f07e2003-11-18 16:05:23 +0000[diff] [blame]461</div>
462
Chris Lattner23353312003-11-19 05:53:12 +0000[diff] [blame]463<div class="question">
John Criswell5e0f07e2003-11-18 16:05:23 +0000[diff] [blame]464<p>
465When I compile code using the LLVM GCC front end, it complains that it cannot
John Criswelld89dbd02004-03-12 18:20:15 +0000[diff] [blame]466find libcrtend.a.
John Criswell5e0f07e2003-11-18 16:05:23 +0000[diff] [blame]467</p>
468</div>
469
Chris Lattner23353312003-11-19 05:53:12 +0000[diff] [blame]470<div class="answer">
John Criswell5e0f07e2003-11-18 16:05:23 +0000[diff] [blame]471<p>
Reid Spencer360d6b72004-12-15 00:14:01 +0000[diff] [blame]472The only way this can happen is if you haven't installed the runtime library. To
473correct this, do:</p>
474<pre>
475 % cd llvm/runtime
476 % make clean ; make install-bytecode
477</pre>
John Criswell5e0f07e2003-11-18 16:05:23 +0000[diff] [blame]478</div>
Chris Lattner23353312003-11-19 05:53:12 +0000[diff] [blame]479
Tanya Lattneraf0ac272005-04-25 20:36:56 +0000[diff] [blame]480<div class="question">
481<p>
482How can I disable all optimizations when compiling code using the LLVM GCC front end?
483</p>
484</div>
485
486<div class="answer">
487<p>
488Passing "-Wa,-disable-opt -Wl,-disable-opt" will disable *all* cleanup and
489optimizations done at the llvm level, leaving you with the truly horrible
490code that you desire.
491</p>
492</div>
Chris Lattner23353312003-11-19 05:53:12 +0000[diff] [blame]493
Chris Lattner7b1d3c02006-07-19 18:19:59 +0000[diff] [blame]494
495<div class="question">
496<p>
497<a name="translatec++">Can I use LLVM to convert C++ code to C code?</a>
498</p>
499</div>
500
501<div class="answer">
502<p>Yes, you can use LLVM to convert code from any language LLVM supports to C.
503Note that the generated C code will be very low level (all loops are lowered
504to gotos, etc) and not very pretty (comments are stripped, original source
505formatting is totally lost, variables are renamed, expressions are regrouped),
506so this may not be what you're looking for. However, this is a good way to add
507C++ support for a processor that does not otherwise have a C++ compiler.
508</p>
509
510<p>Use commands like this:</p>
511
512<ol>
513<li><p>Compile your program as normal with llvm-g++:</p></li>
514
515<div class="doc_code">$ llvm-g++ x.cpp -o program</div>
516
517<p>or:</p>
518
519<div class="doc_code">
Chris Lattnerb0961902006-08-31 04:26:31 +0000[diff] [blame]520 llvm-g++ a.cpp -c<br>
521 llvm-g++ b.cpp -c<br>
Chris Lattner7b1d3c02006-07-19 18:19:59 +0000[diff] [blame]522 llvm-g++ a.o b.o -o program
523</div>
524
525<p>With llvm-gcc3, this will generate program and program.bc. The .bc file is
526the LLVM version of the program all linked together.</p>
527
528<li><p>Convert the LLVM code to C code, using the LLC tool with the C
529backend:</p></li>
530
531<div class="doc_code">$ llc -march=c program.bc -o program.c</div>
532
533<li><p>Finally, compile the c file:</p></li>
534
535<div class="doc_code">$ cc x.c</div>
536
537</ol>
538
539<p>Note that, by default, the C backend does not support exception handling.
540If you want/need it for a certain program, you can enable it by passing
541"-enable-correct-eh-support" to the llc program. The resultant code will
542use setjmp/longjmp to implement exception support that is correct but
543relatively slow.
544</p>
Chris Lattnerb0961902006-08-31 04:26:31 +0000[diff] [blame]545
546<p>Also note: this specific sequence of commands won't work if you use a
547function defined in the C++ runtime library (or any other C++ library). To
548access an external C++ library, you must manually
549compile libstdc++ to LLVM bytecode, statically link it into your program, then
550use the commands above to convert the whole result into C code. Alternatively,
551you can compile the libraries and your application into two different chunks
552of C code and link them.</p>
553
Chris Lattner7b1d3c02006-07-19 18:19:59 +0000[diff] [blame]554</div>
555
556
557
Chris Lattner23353312003-11-19 05:53:12 +0000[diff] [blame]558<!-- *********************************************************************** -->
559<div class="doc_section">
560 <a name="cfe_code">Questions about code generated by the GCC front-end</a>
561</div>
562
Chris Lattnere7670a02003-12-16 22:33:55 +0000[diff] [blame]563<div class="question"><p>
Chris Lattner37d55472005-02-25 20:30:21 +0000[diff] [blame]564<a name="__main"></a>
Chris Lattner23353312003-11-19 05:53:12 +0000[diff] [blame]565What is this <tt>__main()</tt> call that gets inserted into <tt>main()</tt>?
Chris Lattnere7670a02003-12-16 22:33:55 +0000[diff] [blame]566</p></div>
Chris Lattner23353312003-11-19 05:53:12 +0000[diff] [blame]567
568<div class="answer">
569<p>
570The <tt>__main</tt> call is inserted by the C/C++ compiler in order to guarantee
571that static constructors and destructors are called when the program starts up
572and shuts down. In C, you can create static constructors and destructors by
573using GCC extensions, and in C++ you can do so by creating a global variable
574whose class has a ctor or dtor.
575</p>
576
577<p>
578The actual implementation of <tt>__main</tt> lives in the
579<tt>llvm/runtime/GCCLibraries/crtend/</tt> directory in the source-base, and is
580linked in automatically when you link the program.
581</p>
Chris Lattner23353312003-11-19 05:53:12 +0000[diff] [blame]582</div>
583
Chris Lattnere7670a02003-12-16 22:33:55 +0000[diff] [blame]584<!--=========================================================================-->
Chris Lattner23353312003-11-19 05:53:12 +0000[diff] [blame]585
Misha Brukman8d9a83a2004-12-03 23:58:18 +0000[diff] [blame]586<div class="question">
Chris Lattner37d55472005-02-25 20:30:21 +0000[diff] [blame]587<a name="iosinit"></a>
Misha Brukman8d9a83a2004-12-03 23:58:18 +0000[diff] [blame]588<p> What is this <tt>llvm.global_ctors</tt> and
589<tt>_GLOBAL__I__tmp_webcompile...</tt> stuff that happens when I #include
590&lt;iostream&gt;?</p>
591</div>
Chris Lattner87d6b402004-03-29 19:14:35 +0000[diff] [blame]592
593<div class="answer">
Misha Brukman8d9a83a2004-12-03 23:58:18 +0000[diff] [blame]594
595<p>If you #include the &lt;iostream&gt; header into a C++ translation unit, the
Chris Lattner87d6b402004-03-29 19:14:35 +0000[diff] [blame]596file will probably use the <tt>std::cin</tt>/<tt>std::cout</tt>/... global
597objects. However, C++ does not guarantee an order of initialization between
598static objects in different translation units, so if a static ctor/dtor in your
599.cpp file used <tt>std::cout</tt>, for example, the object would not necessarily
Misha Brukman8d9a83a2004-12-03 23:58:18 +0000[diff] [blame]600be automatically initialized before your use.</p>
Chris Lattner87d6b402004-03-29 19:14:35 +0000[diff] [blame]601
Misha Brukman8d9a83a2004-12-03 23:58:18 +0000[diff] [blame]602<p>To make <tt>std::cout</tt> and friends work correctly in these scenarios, the
Chris Lattner87d6b402004-03-29 19:14:35 +0000[diff] [blame]603STL that we use declares a static object that gets created in every translation
Misha Brukman8d9a83a2004-12-03 23:58:18 +0000[diff] [blame]604unit that includes <tt>&lt;iostream&gt;</tt>. This object has a static
605constructor and destructor that initializes and destroys the global iostream
606objects before they could possibly be used in the file. The code that you see
607in the .ll file corresponds to the constructor and destructor registration code.
Chris Lattner87d6b402004-03-29 19:14:35 +0000[diff] [blame]608</p>
609
Misha Brukman8d9a83a2004-12-03 23:58:18 +0000[diff] [blame]610<p>If you would like to make it easier to <b>understand</b> the LLVM code
611generated by the compiler in the demo page, consider using <tt>printf()</tt>
612instead of <tt>iostream</tt>s to print values.</p>
613
Chris Lattner87d6b402004-03-29 19:14:35 +0000[diff] [blame]614</div>
615
Chris Lattner37d55472005-02-25 20:30:21 +0000[diff] [blame]616<!--=========================================================================-->
617
618<div class="question"><p>
619<a name="codedce"></a>
620Where did all of my code go??
621</p></div>
622
623<div class="answer">
624<p>
625If you are using the LLVM demo page, you may often wonder what happened to all
626of the code that you typed in. Remember that the demo script is running the
627code through the LLVM optimizers, so if your code doesn't actually do anything
628useful, it might all be deleted.
629</p>
630
631<p>
632To prevent this, make sure that the code is actually needed. For example, if
633you are computing some expression, return the value from the function instead of
634leaving it in a local variable. If you really want to constrain the optimizer,
635you can read from and assign to <tt>volatile</tt> global variables.
636</p>
637</div>
638
639<!--=========================================================================-->
640
641<div class="question"><p>
642<a name="undef"></a>
643<p>What is this "<tt>undef</tt>" thing that shows up in my code?
644</p></div>
645
646<div class="answer">
647<p>
648<a href="LangRef.html#undef"><tt>undef</tt></a> is the LLVM way of representing
649a value that is not defined. You can get these if you do not initialize a
650variable before you use it. For example, the C function:</p>
651
652<div class="doc_code">
653 <tt>int X() { int i; return i; }</tt>
654</div>
655
656<p>Is compiled to "<tt>ret int undef</tt>" because "i" never has a value
657specified for it.
658</p>
659</div>
660
John Criswell5e0f07e2003-11-18 16:05:23 +0000[diff] [blame]661<!-- *********************************************************************** -->
John Criswell8af73202003-10-13 16:13:06 +0000[diff] [blame]662
663<hr>
Misha Brukman5363e382004-06-01 18:51:03 +0000[diff] [blame]664<address>
665 <a href="http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/check/referer"><img
666 src="http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/images/vcss" alt="Valid CSS!"></a>
667 <a href="http://validator.w3.org/check/referer"><img
668 src="http://www.w3.org/Icons/valid-html401" alt="Valid HTML 4.01!"></a>
669
Reid Spencerca058542006-03-14 05:39:39 +0000[diff] [blame]670 <a href="http://llvm.org">LLVM Compiler Infrastructure</a><br>
Misha Brukman6c91a332003-11-06 21:55:44 +0000[diff] [blame]671 Last modified: $Date$
Misha Brukman5363e382004-06-01 18:51:03 +0000[diff] [blame]672</address>
John Criswellebe140b2003-10-24 22:48:20 +0000[diff] [blame]673
John Criswell8af73202003-10-13 16:13:06 +0000[diff] [blame]674</body>
675</html>