| JF Bastien | e77b48b | 2018-09-10 20:42:56 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 1 | // RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -verify -ffreestanding -fsyntax-only -triple=i686-linux-gnu -std=c11 -Watomic-implicit-seq-cst -Wno-sync-fetch-and-nand-semantics-changed |
| 2 | |
| 3 | // __sync_* operations are implicitly sequentially-consistent. Some codebases |
| 4 | // want to force explicit usage of memory order instead. |
| 5 | |
| 6 | void fetch_and_add(int *ptr, int val) { __sync_fetch_and_add(ptr, val); } // expected-warning {{implicit use of sequentially-consistent atomic may incur stronger memory barriers than necessary}} |
| 7 | void fetch_and_sub(int *ptr, int val) { __sync_fetch_and_sub(ptr, val); } // expected-warning {{implicit use of sequentially-consistent atomic may incur stronger memory barriers than necessary}} |
| 8 | void fetch_and_or(int *ptr, int val) { __sync_fetch_and_or(ptr, val); } // expected-warning {{implicit use of sequentially-consistent atomic may incur stronger memory barriers than necessary}} |
| 9 | void fetch_and_and(int *ptr, int val) { __sync_fetch_and_and(ptr, val); } // expected-warning {{implicit use of sequentially-consistent atomic may incur stronger memory barriers than necessary}} |
| 10 | void fetch_and_xor(int *ptr, int val) { __sync_fetch_and_xor(ptr, val); } // expected-warning {{implicit use of sequentially-consistent atomic may incur stronger memory barriers than necessary}} |
| 11 | void fetch_and_nand(int *ptr, int val) { __sync_fetch_and_nand(ptr, val); } // expected-warning {{implicit use of sequentially-consistent atomic may incur stronger memory barriers than necessary}} |
| 12 | |
| 13 | void add_and_fetch(int *ptr, int val) { __sync_add_and_fetch(ptr, val); } // expected-warning {{implicit use of sequentially-consistent atomic may incur stronger memory barriers than necessary}} |
| 14 | void sub_and_fetch(int *ptr, int val) { __sync_sub_and_fetch(ptr, val); } // expected-warning {{implicit use of sequentially-consistent atomic may incur stronger memory barriers than necessary}} |
| 15 | void or_and_fetch(int *ptr, int val) { __sync_or_and_fetch(ptr, val); } // expected-warning {{implicit use of sequentially-consistent atomic may incur stronger memory barriers than necessary}} |
| 16 | void and_and_fetch(int *ptr, int val) { __sync_and_and_fetch(ptr, val); } // expected-warning {{implicit use of sequentially-consistent atomic may incur stronger memory barriers than necessary}} |
| 17 | void xor_and_fetch(int *ptr, int val) { __sync_xor_and_fetch(ptr, val); } // expected-warning {{implicit use of sequentially-consistent atomic may incur stronger memory barriers than necessary}} |
| 18 | void nand_and_fetch(int *ptr, int val) { __sync_nand_and_fetch(ptr, val); } // expected-warning {{implicit use of sequentially-consistent atomic may incur stronger memory barriers than necessary}} |
| 19 | |
| 20 | void bool_compare_and_swap(int *ptr, int oldval, int newval) { __sync_bool_compare_and_swap(ptr, oldval, newval); } // expected-warning {{implicit use of sequentially-consistent atomic may incur stronger memory barriers than necessary}} |
| 21 | void val_compare_and_swap(int *ptr, int oldval, int newval) { __sync_val_compare_and_swap(ptr, oldval, newval); } // expected-warning {{implicit use of sequentially-consistent atomic may incur stronger memory barriers than necessary}} |
| 22 | |
| 23 | void synchronize(void) { __sync_synchronize(); } // expected-warning {{implicit use of sequentially-consistent atomic may incur stronger memory barriers than necessary}} |
| 24 | |
| 25 | void lock_test_and_set(int *ptr, int val) { __sync_lock_test_and_set(ptr, val); } // expected-warning {{implicit use of sequentially-consistent atomic may incur stronger memory barriers than necessary}} |
| 26 | void lock_release(int *ptr) { __sync_lock_release(ptr); } // expected-warning {{implicit use of sequentially-consistent atomic may incur stronger memory barriers than necessary}} |