blob: 44b69bed7c27245e20be77e9b4cf7dd3657b9fea [file] [log] [blame]
Dominic Chen184c6242017-03-03 18:02:02 +00001// RUN: %clang_analyze_cc1 -w -analyzer-checker=core.DivideZero -analyzer-output=text -verify %s
Artem Dergachev0c334062016-10-05 08:19:49 +00002
3// This test file verifies the "Assuming..." diagnostic pieces that are being
4// reported when the branch condition was too complicated to explain.
5// Therefore, if your change replaces the generic "Assuming the condition is
6// true" with a more specific message, causing this test to fail, the condition
7// should be replaced with a more complicated condition that we still cannot
8// properly explain to the user. Once we reach the point at which all conditions
9// are "diagnosable", this test (or this note) should probably be removed,
10// together with the code section that handles generic messages for
11// non-diagnosable conditions.
12
13// Function calls are currently non-diagnosable.
14int non_diagnosable();
15
16void test_true() {
17 if (non_diagnosable()) {
18 // expected-note@-1{{Assuming the condition is true}}
19 // expected-note@-2{{Taking true branch}}
20 1 / 0;
21 // expected-warning@-1{{Division by zero}}
22 // expected-note@-2{{Division by zero}}
23 }
24}
25
26void test_false() {
27 if (non_diagnosable()) {
28 // expected-note@-1{{Assuming the condition is false}}
29 // expected-note@-2{{Taking false branch}}
30 } else {
31 1 / 0;
32 // expected-warning@-1{{Division by zero}}
33 // expected-note@-2{{Division by zero}}
34 }
35}
36
37// Test that we're still reporting that the condition is true,
38// when we encounter an exclamation mark (used to be broken).
39void test_exclamation_mark() {
40 if (!non_diagnosable()) {
41 // expected-note@-1{{Assuming the condition is true}}
42 // expected-note@-2{{Taking true branch}}
43 1 / 0;
44 // expected-warning@-1{{Division by zero}}
45 // expected-note@-2{{Division by zero}}
46 }
47}