| Chandler Carruth | 7431992 | 2016-02-23 10:02:02 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 1 | //===- CGSCCPassManagerTest.cpp -------------------------------------------===// | 
|  | 2 | // | 
| Chandler Carruth | 2946cd7 | 2019-01-19 08:50:56 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 3 | // Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions. | 
|  | 4 | // See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information. | 
|  | 5 | // SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception | 
| Chandler Carruth | 7431992 | 2016-02-23 10:02:02 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 6 | // | 
|  | 7 | //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// | 
|  | 8 |  | 
|  | 9 | #include "llvm/Analysis/CGSCCPassManager.h" | 
|  | 10 | #include "llvm/Analysis/LazyCallGraph.h" | 
| Chandler Carruth | f59a838 | 2017-07-15 08:08:19 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 11 | #include "llvm/Analysis/TargetLibraryInfo.h" | 
| Chandler Carruth | 7431992 | 2016-02-23 10:02:02 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 12 | #include "llvm/AsmParser/Parser.h" | 
|  | 13 | #include "llvm/IR/Function.h" | 
|  | 14 | #include "llvm/IR/InstIterator.h" | 
|  | 15 | #include "llvm/IR/LLVMContext.h" | 
|  | 16 | #include "llvm/IR/Module.h" | 
|  | 17 | #include "llvm/IR/PassManager.h" | 
|  | 18 | #include "llvm/Support/SourceMgr.h" | 
|  | 19 | #include "gtest/gtest.h" | 
|  | 20 |  | 
|  | 21 | using namespace llvm; | 
|  | 22 |  | 
|  | 23 | namespace { | 
|  | 24 |  | 
| Chandler Carruth | dab4eae | 2016-11-23 17:53:26 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 25 | class TestModuleAnalysis : public AnalysisInfoMixin<TestModuleAnalysis> { | 
| Chandler Carruth | 7431992 | 2016-02-23 10:02:02 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 26 | public: | 
|  | 27 | struct Result { | 
|  | 28 | Result(int Count) : FunctionCount(Count) {} | 
|  | 29 | int FunctionCount; | 
|  | 30 | }; | 
|  | 31 |  | 
| Chandler Carruth | 7431992 | 2016-02-23 10:02:02 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 32 | TestModuleAnalysis(int &Runs) : Runs(Runs) {} | 
|  | 33 |  | 
| Chandler Carruth | b47f801 | 2016-03-11 11:05:24 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 34 | Result run(Module &M, ModuleAnalysisManager &AM) { | 
| Chandler Carruth | 7431992 | 2016-02-23 10:02:02 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 35 | ++Runs; | 
|  | 36 | return Result(M.size()); | 
|  | 37 | } | 
|  | 38 |  | 
|  | 39 | private: | 
| Chandler Carruth | dab4eae | 2016-11-23 17:53:26 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 40 | friend AnalysisInfoMixin<TestModuleAnalysis>; | 
|  | 41 | static AnalysisKey Key; | 
| Chandler Carruth | 7431992 | 2016-02-23 10:02:02 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 42 |  | 
|  | 43 | int &Runs; | 
|  | 44 | }; | 
|  | 45 |  | 
| Chandler Carruth | dab4eae | 2016-11-23 17:53:26 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 46 | AnalysisKey TestModuleAnalysis::Key; | 
| Chandler Carruth | 7431992 | 2016-02-23 10:02:02 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 47 |  | 
| Chandler Carruth | dab4eae | 2016-11-23 17:53:26 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 48 | class TestSCCAnalysis : public AnalysisInfoMixin<TestSCCAnalysis> { | 
| Chandler Carruth | 7431992 | 2016-02-23 10:02:02 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 49 | public: | 
|  | 50 | struct Result { | 
|  | 51 | Result(int Count) : FunctionCount(Count) {} | 
|  | 52 | int FunctionCount; | 
|  | 53 | }; | 
|  | 54 |  | 
| Chandler Carruth | 7431992 | 2016-02-23 10:02:02 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 55 | TestSCCAnalysis(int &Runs) : Runs(Runs) {} | 
|  | 56 |  | 
| Chandler Carruth | 8882346 | 2016-08-24 09:37:14 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 57 | Result run(LazyCallGraph::SCC &C, CGSCCAnalysisManager &AM, LazyCallGraph &) { | 
| Chandler Carruth | 7431992 | 2016-02-23 10:02:02 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 58 | ++Runs; | 
|  | 59 | return Result(C.size()); | 
|  | 60 | } | 
|  | 61 |  | 
|  | 62 | private: | 
| Chandler Carruth | dab4eae | 2016-11-23 17:53:26 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 63 | friend AnalysisInfoMixin<TestSCCAnalysis>; | 
|  | 64 | static AnalysisKey Key; | 
| Chandler Carruth | 7431992 | 2016-02-23 10:02:02 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 65 |  | 
|  | 66 | int &Runs; | 
|  | 67 | }; | 
|  | 68 |  | 
| Chandler Carruth | dab4eae | 2016-11-23 17:53:26 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 69 | AnalysisKey TestSCCAnalysis::Key; | 
| Chandler Carruth | 7431992 | 2016-02-23 10:02:02 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 70 |  | 
| Chandler Carruth | dab4eae | 2016-11-23 17:53:26 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 71 | class TestFunctionAnalysis : public AnalysisInfoMixin<TestFunctionAnalysis> { | 
| Chandler Carruth | 7431992 | 2016-02-23 10:02:02 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 72 | public: | 
|  | 73 | struct Result { | 
|  | 74 | Result(int Count) : InstructionCount(Count) {} | 
|  | 75 | int InstructionCount; | 
|  | 76 | }; | 
|  | 77 |  | 
| Chandler Carruth | 7431992 | 2016-02-23 10:02:02 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 78 | TestFunctionAnalysis(int &Runs) : Runs(Runs) {} | 
|  | 79 |  | 
| Chandler Carruth | b47f801 | 2016-03-11 11:05:24 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 80 | Result run(Function &F, FunctionAnalysisManager &AM) { | 
| Chandler Carruth | 7431992 | 2016-02-23 10:02:02 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 81 | ++Runs; | 
|  | 82 | int Count = 0; | 
|  | 83 | for (Instruction &I : instructions(F)) { | 
|  | 84 | (void)I; | 
|  | 85 | ++Count; | 
|  | 86 | } | 
|  | 87 | return Result(Count); | 
|  | 88 | } | 
|  | 89 |  | 
|  | 90 | private: | 
| Chandler Carruth | dab4eae | 2016-11-23 17:53:26 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 91 | friend AnalysisInfoMixin<TestFunctionAnalysis>; | 
|  | 92 | static AnalysisKey Key; | 
| Chandler Carruth | 7431992 | 2016-02-23 10:02:02 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 93 |  | 
|  | 94 | int &Runs; | 
|  | 95 | }; | 
|  | 96 |  | 
| Chandler Carruth | dab4eae | 2016-11-23 17:53:26 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 97 | AnalysisKey TestFunctionAnalysis::Key; | 
| Chandler Carruth | 7431992 | 2016-02-23 10:02:02 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 98 |  | 
| Chandler Carruth | dab4eae | 2016-11-23 17:53:26 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 99 | class TestImmutableFunctionAnalysis | 
|  | 100 | : public AnalysisInfoMixin<TestImmutableFunctionAnalysis> { | 
| Chandler Carruth | c5d211e | 2016-02-23 10:47:57 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 101 | public: | 
|  | 102 | struct Result { | 
| Chandler Carruth | 3ab2a5a | 2016-11-28 22:04:31 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 103 | bool invalidate(Function &, const PreservedAnalyses &, | 
|  | 104 | FunctionAnalysisManager::Invalidator &) { | 
|  | 105 | return false; | 
|  | 106 | } | 
| Chandler Carruth | c5d211e | 2016-02-23 10:47:57 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 107 | }; | 
|  | 108 |  | 
| Chandler Carruth | c5d211e | 2016-02-23 10:47:57 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 109 | TestImmutableFunctionAnalysis(int &Runs) : Runs(Runs) {} | 
|  | 110 |  | 
| Chandler Carruth | b47f801 | 2016-03-11 11:05:24 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 111 | Result run(Function &F, FunctionAnalysisManager &AM) { | 
| Chandler Carruth | c5d211e | 2016-02-23 10:47:57 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 112 | ++Runs; | 
|  | 113 | return Result(); | 
|  | 114 | } | 
|  | 115 |  | 
|  | 116 | private: | 
| Chandler Carruth | dab4eae | 2016-11-23 17:53:26 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 117 | friend AnalysisInfoMixin<TestImmutableFunctionAnalysis>; | 
|  | 118 | static AnalysisKey Key; | 
| Chandler Carruth | c5d211e | 2016-02-23 10:47:57 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 119 |  | 
|  | 120 | int &Runs; | 
|  | 121 | }; | 
|  | 122 |  | 
| Chandler Carruth | dab4eae | 2016-11-23 17:53:26 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 123 | AnalysisKey TestImmutableFunctionAnalysis::Key; | 
| Chandler Carruth | c5d211e | 2016-02-23 10:47:57 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 124 |  | 
| Chandler Carruth | 6b98164 | 2016-12-10 06:34:44 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 125 | struct LambdaModulePass : public PassInfoMixin<LambdaModulePass> { | 
|  | 126 | template <typename T> | 
|  | 127 | LambdaModulePass(T &&Arg) : Func(std::forward<T>(Arg)) {} | 
|  | 128 |  | 
|  | 129 | PreservedAnalyses run(Module &F, ModuleAnalysisManager &AM) { | 
|  | 130 | return Func(F, AM); | 
|  | 131 | } | 
|  | 132 |  | 
|  | 133 | std::function<PreservedAnalyses(Module &, ModuleAnalysisManager &)> Func; | 
|  | 134 | }; | 
|  | 135 |  | 
| Chandler Carruth | d4e80a9 | 2016-09-02 01:08:04 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 136 | struct LambdaSCCPass : public PassInfoMixin<LambdaSCCPass> { | 
|  | 137 | template <typename T> LambdaSCCPass(T &&Arg) : Func(std::forward<T>(Arg)) {} | 
| Chandler Carruth | 7431992 | 2016-02-23 10:02:02 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 138 |  | 
| Chandler Carruth | 8882346 | 2016-08-24 09:37:14 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 139 | PreservedAnalyses run(LazyCallGraph::SCC &C, CGSCCAnalysisManager &AM, | 
|  | 140 | LazyCallGraph &CG, CGSCCUpdateResult &UR) { | 
| Chandler Carruth | d4e80a9 | 2016-09-02 01:08:04 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 141 | return Func(C, AM, CG, UR); | 
| Chandler Carruth | 7431992 | 2016-02-23 10:02:02 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 142 | } | 
|  | 143 |  | 
| Chandler Carruth | d4e80a9 | 2016-09-02 01:08:04 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 144 | std::function<PreservedAnalyses(LazyCallGraph::SCC &, CGSCCAnalysisManager &, | 
|  | 145 | LazyCallGraph &, CGSCCUpdateResult &)> | 
|  | 146 | Func; | 
| Chandler Carruth | 7431992 | 2016-02-23 10:02:02 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 147 | }; | 
|  | 148 |  | 
| Chandler Carruth | d4e80a9 | 2016-09-02 01:08:04 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 149 | struct LambdaFunctionPass : public PassInfoMixin<LambdaFunctionPass> { | 
| Chandler Carruth | 6b98164 | 2016-12-10 06:34:44 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 150 | template <typename T> | 
|  | 151 | LambdaFunctionPass(T &&Arg) : Func(std::forward<T>(Arg)) {} | 
| Chandler Carruth | 7431992 | 2016-02-23 10:02:02 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 152 |  | 
| Chandler Carruth | d4e80a9 | 2016-09-02 01:08:04 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 153 | PreservedAnalyses run(Function &F, FunctionAnalysisManager &AM) { | 
|  | 154 | return Func(F, AM); | 
| Chandler Carruth | 7431992 | 2016-02-23 10:02:02 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 155 | } | 
|  | 156 |  | 
| Chandler Carruth | d4e80a9 | 2016-09-02 01:08:04 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 157 | std::function<PreservedAnalyses(Function &, FunctionAnalysisManager &)> Func; | 
| Chandler Carruth | 7431992 | 2016-02-23 10:02:02 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 158 | }; | 
|  | 159 |  | 
| Chandler Carruth | 6c138ce | 2016-06-28 00:38:42 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 160 | std::unique_ptr<Module> parseIR(const char *IR) { | 
|  | 161 | // We just use a static context here. This is never called from multiple | 
|  | 162 | // threads so it is harmless no matter how it is implemented. We just need | 
|  | 163 | // the context to outlive the module which it does. | 
|  | 164 | static LLVMContext C; | 
| Chandler Carruth | 7431992 | 2016-02-23 10:02:02 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 165 | SMDiagnostic Err; | 
|  | 166 | return parseAssemblyString(IR, Err, C); | 
|  | 167 | } | 
|  | 168 |  | 
| Chandler Carruth | 4f83742 | 2016-09-02 01:14:05 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 169 | class CGSCCPassManagerTest : public ::testing::Test { | 
|  | 170 | protected: | 
|  | 171 | LLVMContext Context; | 
| Chandler Carruth | dc288a8 | 2016-09-26 06:29:21 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 172 | FunctionAnalysisManager FAM; | 
|  | 173 | CGSCCAnalysisManager CGAM; | 
|  | 174 | ModuleAnalysisManager MAM; | 
|  | 175 |  | 
| Chandler Carruth | 4f83742 | 2016-09-02 01:14:05 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 176 | std::unique_ptr<Module> M; | 
|  | 177 |  | 
|  | 178 | public: | 
|  | 179 | CGSCCPassManagerTest() | 
| Chandler Carruth | dc288a8 | 2016-09-26 06:29:21 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 180 | : FAM(/*DebugLogging*/ true), CGAM(/*DebugLogging*/ true), | 
| Chandler Carruth | 4cf2c89 | 2016-11-28 03:40:33 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 181 | MAM(/*DebugLogging*/ true), | 
|  | 182 | M(parseIR( | 
|  | 183 | // Define a module with the following call graph, where calls go | 
|  | 184 | // out the bottom of nodes and enter the top: | 
|  | 185 | // | 
|  | 186 | // f | 
|  | 187 | // |\   _ | 
|  | 188 | // | \ / | | 
|  | 189 | // g  h1 | | 
|  | 190 | // |  |  | | 
|  | 191 | // |  h2 | | 
|  | 192 | // |  |  | | 
|  | 193 | // |  h3 | | 
|  | 194 | // | / \_/ | 
|  | 195 | // |/ | 
|  | 196 | // x | 
|  | 197 | // | 
|  | 198 | "define void @f() {\n" | 
|  | 199 | "entry:\n" | 
|  | 200 | "  call void @g()\n" | 
|  | 201 | "  call void @h1()\n" | 
|  | 202 | "  ret void\n" | 
|  | 203 | "}\n" | 
|  | 204 | "define void @g() {\n" | 
|  | 205 | "entry:\n" | 
|  | 206 | "  call void @g()\n" | 
|  | 207 | "  call void @x()\n" | 
|  | 208 | "  ret void\n" | 
|  | 209 | "}\n" | 
|  | 210 | "define void @h1() {\n" | 
|  | 211 | "entry:\n" | 
|  | 212 | "  call void @h2()\n" | 
|  | 213 | "  ret void\n" | 
|  | 214 | "}\n" | 
|  | 215 | "define void @h2() {\n" | 
|  | 216 | "entry:\n" | 
|  | 217 | "  call void @h3()\n" | 
|  | 218 | "  call void @x()\n" | 
|  | 219 | "  ret void\n" | 
|  | 220 | "}\n" | 
|  | 221 | "define void @h3() {\n" | 
|  | 222 | "entry:\n" | 
|  | 223 | "  call void @h1()\n" | 
|  | 224 | "  ret void\n" | 
|  | 225 | "}\n" | 
|  | 226 | "define void @x() {\n" | 
|  | 227 | "entry:\n" | 
|  | 228 | "  ret void\n" | 
|  | 229 | "}\n")) { | 
| Chandler Carruth | f59a838 | 2017-07-15 08:08:19 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 230 | MAM.registerPass([&] { return TargetLibraryAnalysis(); }); | 
| Chandler Carruth | dc288a8 | 2016-09-26 06:29:21 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 231 | MAM.registerPass([&] { return LazyCallGraphAnalysis(); }); | 
|  | 232 | MAM.registerPass([&] { return FunctionAnalysisManagerModuleProxy(FAM); }); | 
| Fedor Sergeev | ee8d31c | 2018-09-20 17:08:45 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 233 |  | 
|  | 234 | // Register required pass instrumentation analysis. | 
|  | 235 | MAM.registerPass([&] { return PassInstrumentationAnalysis(); }); | 
|  | 236 | CGAM.registerPass([&] { return PassInstrumentationAnalysis(); }); | 
|  | 237 | FAM.registerPass([&] { return PassInstrumentationAnalysis(); }); | 
|  | 238 |  | 
|  | 239 | // Cross-register proxies. | 
| Chandler Carruth | dc288a8 | 2016-09-26 06:29:21 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 240 | MAM.registerPass([&] { return CGSCCAnalysisManagerModuleProxy(CGAM); }); | 
| Chandler Carruth | 6b98164 | 2016-12-10 06:34:44 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 241 | CGAM.registerPass([&] { return FunctionAnalysisManagerCGSCCProxy(); }); | 
| Chandler Carruth | dc288a8 | 2016-09-26 06:29:21 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 242 | CGAM.registerPass([&] { return ModuleAnalysisManagerCGSCCProxy(MAM); }); | 
|  | 243 | FAM.registerPass([&] { return CGSCCAnalysisManagerFunctionProxy(CGAM); }); | 
|  | 244 | FAM.registerPass([&] { return ModuleAnalysisManagerFunctionProxy(MAM); }); | 
|  | 245 | } | 
| Chandler Carruth | 4f83742 | 2016-09-02 01:14:05 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 246 | }; | 
|  | 247 |  | 
|  | 248 | TEST_F(CGSCCPassManagerTest, Basic) { | 
| Chandler Carruth | 7431992 | 2016-02-23 10:02:02 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 249 | int FunctionAnalysisRuns = 0; | 
|  | 250 | FAM.registerPass([&] { return TestFunctionAnalysis(FunctionAnalysisRuns); }); | 
| Chandler Carruth | c5d211e | 2016-02-23 10:47:57 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 251 | int ImmutableFunctionAnalysisRuns = 0; | 
|  | 252 | FAM.registerPass([&] { | 
|  | 253 | return TestImmutableFunctionAnalysis(ImmutableFunctionAnalysisRuns); | 
|  | 254 | }); | 
| Chandler Carruth | 7431992 | 2016-02-23 10:02:02 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 255 |  | 
| Chandler Carruth | 7431992 | 2016-02-23 10:02:02 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 256 | int SCCAnalysisRuns = 0; | 
|  | 257 | CGAM.registerPass([&] { return TestSCCAnalysis(SCCAnalysisRuns); }); | 
|  | 258 |  | 
| Chandler Carruth | 7431992 | 2016-02-23 10:02:02 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 259 | int ModuleAnalysisRuns = 0; | 
| Chandler Carruth | 7431992 | 2016-02-23 10:02:02 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 260 | MAM.registerPass([&] { return TestModuleAnalysis(ModuleAnalysisRuns); }); | 
|  | 261 |  | 
| Chandler Carruth | 7431992 | 2016-02-23 10:02:02 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 262 | ModulePassManager MPM(/*DebugLogging*/ true); | 
| Chandler Carruth | d4e80a9 | 2016-09-02 01:08:04 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 263 | MPM.addPass(RequireAnalysisPass<TestModuleAnalysis, Module>()); | 
| Chandler Carruth | 7431992 | 2016-02-23 10:02:02 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 264 |  | 
|  | 265 | CGSCCPassManager CGPM1(/*DebugLogging*/ true); | 
| Chandler Carruth | 6b98164 | 2016-12-10 06:34:44 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 266 | FunctionPassManager FPM1(/*DebugLogging*/ true); | 
|  | 267 | int FunctionPassRunCount1 = 0; | 
|  | 268 | FPM1.addPass(LambdaFunctionPass([&](Function &, FunctionAnalysisManager &) { | 
|  | 269 | ++FunctionPassRunCount1; | 
|  | 270 | return PreservedAnalyses::none(); | 
|  | 271 | })); | 
|  | 272 | CGPM1.addPass(createCGSCCToFunctionPassAdaptor(std::move(FPM1))); | 
|  | 273 |  | 
| Chandler Carruth | 7431992 | 2016-02-23 10:02:02 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 274 | int SCCPassRunCount1 = 0; | 
|  | 275 | int AnalyzedInstrCount1 = 0; | 
|  | 276 | int AnalyzedSCCFunctionCount1 = 0; | 
|  | 277 | int AnalyzedModuleFunctionCount1 = 0; | 
| Chandler Carruth | d4e80a9 | 2016-09-02 01:08:04 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 278 | CGPM1.addPass( | 
|  | 279 | LambdaSCCPass([&](LazyCallGraph::SCC &C, CGSCCAnalysisManager &AM, | 
|  | 280 | LazyCallGraph &CG, CGSCCUpdateResult &UR) { | 
|  | 281 | ++SCCPassRunCount1; | 
|  | 282 |  | 
|  | 283 | const ModuleAnalysisManager &MAM = | 
|  | 284 | AM.getResult<ModuleAnalysisManagerCGSCCProxy>(C, CG).getManager(); | 
|  | 285 | FunctionAnalysisManager &FAM = | 
|  | 286 | AM.getResult<FunctionAnalysisManagerCGSCCProxy>(C, CG).getManager(); | 
|  | 287 | if (TestModuleAnalysis::Result *TMA = | 
|  | 288 | MAM.getCachedResult<TestModuleAnalysis>( | 
|  | 289 | *C.begin()->getFunction().getParent())) | 
|  | 290 | AnalyzedModuleFunctionCount1 += TMA->FunctionCount; | 
|  | 291 |  | 
|  | 292 | TestSCCAnalysis::Result &AR = AM.getResult<TestSCCAnalysis>(C, CG); | 
|  | 293 | AnalyzedSCCFunctionCount1 += AR.FunctionCount; | 
|  | 294 | for (LazyCallGraph::Node &N : C) { | 
|  | 295 | TestFunctionAnalysis::Result &FAR = | 
|  | 296 | FAM.getResult<TestFunctionAnalysis>(N.getFunction()); | 
|  | 297 | AnalyzedInstrCount1 += FAR.InstructionCount; | 
|  | 298 |  | 
|  | 299 | // Just ensure we get the immutable results. | 
|  | 300 | (void)FAM.getResult<TestImmutableFunctionAnalysis>(N.getFunction()); | 
|  | 301 | } | 
|  | 302 |  | 
|  | 303 | return PreservedAnalyses::all(); | 
|  | 304 | })); | 
| Chandler Carruth | 7431992 | 2016-02-23 10:02:02 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 305 |  | 
| Chandler Carruth | 6b98164 | 2016-12-10 06:34:44 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 306 | FunctionPassManager FPM2(/*DebugLogging*/ true); | 
|  | 307 | int FunctionPassRunCount2 = 0; | 
|  | 308 | FPM2.addPass(LambdaFunctionPass([&](Function &, FunctionAnalysisManager &) { | 
|  | 309 | ++FunctionPassRunCount2; | 
|  | 310 | return PreservedAnalyses::none(); | 
| Chandler Carruth | d4e80a9 | 2016-09-02 01:08:04 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 311 | })); | 
| Chandler Carruth | 6b98164 | 2016-12-10 06:34:44 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 312 | CGPM1.addPass(createCGSCCToFunctionPassAdaptor(std::move(FPM2))); | 
|  | 313 |  | 
| Chandler Carruth | 7431992 | 2016-02-23 10:02:02 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 314 | MPM.addPass(createModuleToPostOrderCGSCCPassAdaptor(std::move(CGPM1))); | 
|  | 315 |  | 
| Chandler Carruth | 6b98164 | 2016-12-10 06:34:44 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 316 | FunctionPassManager FPM3(/*DebugLogging*/ true); | 
|  | 317 | int FunctionPassRunCount3 = 0; | 
|  | 318 | FPM3.addPass(LambdaFunctionPass([&](Function &, FunctionAnalysisManager &) { | 
|  | 319 | ++FunctionPassRunCount3; | 
|  | 320 | return PreservedAnalyses::none(); | 
|  | 321 | })); | 
|  | 322 | MPM.addPass(createModuleToFunctionPassAdaptor(std::move(FPM3))); | 
|  | 323 |  | 
| Chandler Carruth | b47f801 | 2016-03-11 11:05:24 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 324 | MPM.run(*M, MAM); | 
| Chandler Carruth | 7431992 | 2016-02-23 10:02:02 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 325 |  | 
| Chandler Carruth | 6b98164 | 2016-12-10 06:34:44 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 326 | EXPECT_EQ(4, SCCPassRunCount1); | 
|  | 327 | EXPECT_EQ(6, FunctionPassRunCount1); | 
|  | 328 | EXPECT_EQ(6, FunctionPassRunCount2); | 
|  | 329 | EXPECT_EQ(6, FunctionPassRunCount3); | 
|  | 330 |  | 
| Chandler Carruth | 7431992 | 2016-02-23 10:02:02 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 331 | EXPECT_EQ(1, ModuleAnalysisRuns); | 
|  | 332 | EXPECT_EQ(4, SCCAnalysisRuns); | 
|  | 333 | EXPECT_EQ(6, FunctionAnalysisRuns); | 
| Chandler Carruth | c5d211e | 2016-02-23 10:47:57 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 334 | EXPECT_EQ(6, ImmutableFunctionAnalysisRuns); | 
| Chandler Carruth | 7431992 | 2016-02-23 10:02:02 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 335 |  | 
| Chandler Carruth | 7431992 | 2016-02-23 10:02:02 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 336 | EXPECT_EQ(14, AnalyzedInstrCount1); | 
|  | 337 | EXPECT_EQ(6, AnalyzedSCCFunctionCount1); | 
|  | 338 | EXPECT_EQ(4 * 6, AnalyzedModuleFunctionCount1); | 
|  | 339 | } | 
|  | 340 |  | 
| Chandler Carruth | b52b573 | 2016-09-26 04:01:55 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 341 | // Test that an SCC pass which fails to preserve a module analysis does in fact | 
|  | 342 | // invalidate that module analysis. | 
|  | 343 | TEST_F(CGSCCPassManagerTest, TestSCCPassInvalidatesModuleAnalysis) { | 
| Chandler Carruth | b52b573 | 2016-09-26 04:01:55 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 344 | int ModuleAnalysisRuns = 0; | 
|  | 345 | MAM.registerPass([&] { return TestModuleAnalysis(ModuleAnalysisRuns); }); | 
|  | 346 |  | 
|  | 347 | ModulePassManager MPM(/*DebugLogging*/ true); | 
|  | 348 | MPM.addPass(RequireAnalysisPass<TestModuleAnalysis, Module>()); | 
|  | 349 |  | 
|  | 350 | // The first CGSCC run we preserve everything and make sure that works and | 
|  | 351 | // the module analysis is available in the second CGSCC run from the one | 
|  | 352 | // required module pass above. | 
|  | 353 | CGSCCPassManager CGPM1(/*DebugLogging*/ true); | 
|  | 354 | int CountFoundModuleAnalysis1 = 0; | 
|  | 355 | CGPM1.addPass( | 
|  | 356 | LambdaSCCPass([&](LazyCallGraph::SCC &C, CGSCCAnalysisManager &AM, | 
|  | 357 | LazyCallGraph &CG, CGSCCUpdateResult &UR) { | 
|  | 358 | const auto &MAM = | 
|  | 359 | AM.getResult<ModuleAnalysisManagerCGSCCProxy>(C, CG).getManager(); | 
|  | 360 | auto *TMA = MAM.getCachedResult<TestModuleAnalysis>( | 
|  | 361 | *C.begin()->getFunction().getParent()); | 
|  | 362 |  | 
|  | 363 | if (TMA) | 
|  | 364 | ++CountFoundModuleAnalysis1; | 
|  | 365 |  | 
|  | 366 | return PreservedAnalyses::all(); | 
|  | 367 | })); | 
|  | 368 | MPM.addPass(createModuleToPostOrderCGSCCPassAdaptor(std::move(CGPM1))); | 
|  | 369 |  | 
|  | 370 | // The second CGSCC run checks that the module analysis got preserved the | 
|  | 371 | // previous time and in one SCC fails to preserve it. | 
|  | 372 | CGSCCPassManager CGPM2(/*DebugLogging*/ true); | 
|  | 373 | int CountFoundModuleAnalysis2 = 0; | 
|  | 374 | CGPM2.addPass( | 
|  | 375 | LambdaSCCPass([&](LazyCallGraph::SCC &C, CGSCCAnalysisManager &AM, | 
|  | 376 | LazyCallGraph &CG, CGSCCUpdateResult &UR) { | 
|  | 377 | const auto &MAM = | 
|  | 378 | AM.getResult<ModuleAnalysisManagerCGSCCProxy>(C, CG).getManager(); | 
|  | 379 | auto *TMA = MAM.getCachedResult<TestModuleAnalysis>( | 
|  | 380 | *C.begin()->getFunction().getParent()); | 
|  | 381 |  | 
|  | 382 | if (TMA) | 
|  | 383 | ++CountFoundModuleAnalysis2; | 
|  | 384 |  | 
|  | 385 | // Only fail to preserve analyses on one SCC and make sure that gets | 
|  | 386 | // propagated. | 
|  | 387 | return C.getName() == "(g)" ? PreservedAnalyses::none() | 
|  | 388 | : PreservedAnalyses::all(); | 
|  | 389 | })); | 
|  | 390 | MPM.addPass(createModuleToPostOrderCGSCCPassAdaptor(std::move(CGPM2))); | 
|  | 391 |  | 
|  | 392 | // The third CGSCC run should fail to find a cached module analysis as it | 
|  | 393 | // should have been invalidated by the above CGSCC run. | 
|  | 394 | CGSCCPassManager CGPM3(/*DebugLogging*/ true); | 
|  | 395 | int CountFoundModuleAnalysis3 = 0; | 
|  | 396 | CGPM3.addPass( | 
|  | 397 | LambdaSCCPass([&](LazyCallGraph::SCC &C, CGSCCAnalysisManager &AM, | 
|  | 398 | LazyCallGraph &CG, CGSCCUpdateResult &UR) { | 
|  | 399 | const auto &MAM = | 
|  | 400 | AM.getResult<ModuleAnalysisManagerCGSCCProxy>(C, CG).getManager(); | 
|  | 401 | auto *TMA = MAM.getCachedResult<TestModuleAnalysis>( | 
|  | 402 | *C.begin()->getFunction().getParent()); | 
|  | 403 |  | 
|  | 404 | if (TMA) | 
|  | 405 | ++CountFoundModuleAnalysis3; | 
|  | 406 |  | 
|  | 407 | return PreservedAnalyses::none(); | 
|  | 408 | })); | 
|  | 409 | MPM.addPass(createModuleToPostOrderCGSCCPassAdaptor(std::move(CGPM3))); | 
|  | 410 |  | 
|  | 411 | MPM.run(*M, MAM); | 
|  | 412 |  | 
|  | 413 | EXPECT_EQ(1, ModuleAnalysisRuns); | 
|  | 414 | EXPECT_EQ(4, CountFoundModuleAnalysis1); | 
|  | 415 | EXPECT_EQ(4, CountFoundModuleAnalysis2); | 
|  | 416 | EXPECT_EQ(0, CountFoundModuleAnalysis3); | 
|  | 417 | } | 
|  | 418 |  | 
| Chandler Carruth | e35f84a | 2016-09-26 04:17:12 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 419 | // Similar to the above, but test that this works for function passes embedded | 
|  | 420 | // *within* a CGSCC layer. | 
|  | 421 | TEST_F(CGSCCPassManagerTest, TestFunctionPassInsideCGSCCInvalidatesModuleAnalysis) { | 
| Chandler Carruth | e35f84a | 2016-09-26 04:17:12 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 422 | int ModuleAnalysisRuns = 0; | 
|  | 423 | MAM.registerPass([&] { return TestModuleAnalysis(ModuleAnalysisRuns); }); | 
|  | 424 |  | 
|  | 425 | ModulePassManager MPM(/*DebugLogging*/ true); | 
|  | 426 | MPM.addPass(RequireAnalysisPass<TestModuleAnalysis, Module>()); | 
|  | 427 |  | 
|  | 428 | // The first run we preserve everything and make sure that works and the | 
|  | 429 | // module analysis is available in the second run from the one required | 
|  | 430 | // module pass above. | 
|  | 431 | FunctionPassManager FPM1(/*DebugLogging*/ true); | 
|  | 432 | // Start true and mark false if we ever failed to find a module analysis | 
|  | 433 | // because we expect this to succeed for each SCC. | 
|  | 434 | bool FoundModuleAnalysis1 = true; | 
|  | 435 | FPM1.addPass( | 
|  | 436 | LambdaFunctionPass([&](Function &F, FunctionAnalysisManager &AM) { | 
|  | 437 | const auto &MAM = | 
|  | 438 | AM.getResult<ModuleAnalysisManagerFunctionProxy>(F).getManager(); | 
|  | 439 | auto *TMA = MAM.getCachedResult<TestModuleAnalysis>(*F.getParent()); | 
|  | 440 |  | 
|  | 441 | if (!TMA) | 
|  | 442 | FoundModuleAnalysis1 = false; | 
|  | 443 |  | 
|  | 444 | return PreservedAnalyses::all(); | 
|  | 445 | })); | 
|  | 446 | CGSCCPassManager CGPM1(/*DebugLogging*/ true); | 
|  | 447 | CGPM1.addPass(createCGSCCToFunctionPassAdaptor(std::move(FPM1))); | 
|  | 448 | MPM.addPass(createModuleToPostOrderCGSCCPassAdaptor(std::move(CGPM1))); | 
|  | 449 |  | 
|  | 450 | // The second run checks that the module analysis got preserved the previous | 
|  | 451 | // time and in one function fails to preserve it. | 
|  | 452 | FunctionPassManager FPM2(/*DebugLogging*/ true); | 
|  | 453 | // Again, start true and mark false if we ever failed to find a module analysis | 
|  | 454 | // because we expect this to succeed for each SCC. | 
|  | 455 | bool FoundModuleAnalysis2 = true; | 
|  | 456 | FPM2.addPass( | 
|  | 457 | LambdaFunctionPass([&](Function &F, FunctionAnalysisManager &AM) { | 
|  | 458 | const auto &MAM = | 
|  | 459 | AM.getResult<ModuleAnalysisManagerFunctionProxy>(F).getManager(); | 
|  | 460 | auto *TMA = MAM.getCachedResult<TestModuleAnalysis>(*F.getParent()); | 
|  | 461 |  | 
|  | 462 | if (!TMA) | 
|  | 463 | FoundModuleAnalysis2 = false; | 
|  | 464 |  | 
|  | 465 | // Only fail to preserve analyses on one SCC and make sure that gets | 
|  | 466 | // propagated. | 
|  | 467 | return F.getName() == "h2" ? PreservedAnalyses::none() | 
|  | 468 | : PreservedAnalyses::all(); | 
|  | 469 | })); | 
|  | 470 | CGSCCPassManager CGPM2(/*DebugLogging*/ true); | 
|  | 471 | CGPM2.addPass(createCGSCCToFunctionPassAdaptor(std::move(FPM2))); | 
|  | 472 | MPM.addPass(createModuleToPostOrderCGSCCPassAdaptor(std::move(CGPM2))); | 
|  | 473 |  | 
|  | 474 | // The third run should fail to find a cached module analysis as it should | 
|  | 475 | // have been invalidated by the above run. | 
|  | 476 | FunctionPassManager FPM3(/*DebugLogging*/ true); | 
|  | 477 | // Start false and mark true if we ever *succeeded* to find a module | 
|  | 478 | // analysis, as we expect this to fail for every function. | 
|  | 479 | bool FoundModuleAnalysis3 = false; | 
|  | 480 | FPM3.addPass( | 
|  | 481 | LambdaFunctionPass([&](Function &F, FunctionAnalysisManager &AM) { | 
|  | 482 | const auto &MAM = | 
|  | 483 | AM.getResult<ModuleAnalysisManagerFunctionProxy>(F).getManager(); | 
|  | 484 | auto *TMA = MAM.getCachedResult<TestModuleAnalysis>(*F.getParent()); | 
|  | 485 |  | 
|  | 486 | if (TMA) | 
|  | 487 | FoundModuleAnalysis3 = true; | 
|  | 488 |  | 
|  | 489 | return PreservedAnalyses::none(); | 
|  | 490 | })); | 
|  | 491 | CGSCCPassManager CGPM3(/*DebugLogging*/ true); | 
|  | 492 | CGPM3.addPass(createCGSCCToFunctionPassAdaptor(std::move(FPM3))); | 
|  | 493 | MPM.addPass(createModuleToPostOrderCGSCCPassAdaptor(std::move(CGPM3))); | 
|  | 494 |  | 
|  | 495 | MPM.run(*M, MAM); | 
|  | 496 |  | 
|  | 497 | EXPECT_EQ(1, ModuleAnalysisRuns); | 
|  | 498 | EXPECT_TRUE(FoundModuleAnalysis1); | 
|  | 499 | EXPECT_TRUE(FoundModuleAnalysis2); | 
|  | 500 | EXPECT_FALSE(FoundModuleAnalysis3); | 
|  | 501 | } | 
|  | 502 |  | 
| Chandler Carruth | 6b98164 | 2016-12-10 06:34:44 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 503 | // Test that a Module pass which fails to preserve an SCC analysis in fact | 
|  | 504 | // invalidates that analysis. | 
|  | 505 | TEST_F(CGSCCPassManagerTest, TestModulePassInvalidatesSCCAnalysis) { | 
|  | 506 | int SCCAnalysisRuns = 0; | 
|  | 507 | CGAM.registerPass([&] { return TestSCCAnalysis(SCCAnalysisRuns); }); | 
|  | 508 |  | 
|  | 509 | ModulePassManager MPM(/*DebugLogging*/ true); | 
|  | 510 |  | 
|  | 511 | // First force the analysis to be run. | 
|  | 512 | CGSCCPassManager CGPM1(/*DebugLogging*/ true); | 
|  | 513 | CGPM1.addPass(RequireAnalysisPass<TestSCCAnalysis, LazyCallGraph::SCC, | 
|  | 514 | CGSCCAnalysisManager, LazyCallGraph &, | 
|  | 515 | CGSCCUpdateResult &>()); | 
|  | 516 | MPM.addPass(createModuleToPostOrderCGSCCPassAdaptor(std::move(CGPM1))); | 
|  | 517 |  | 
|  | 518 | // Now run a module pass that preserves the LazyCallGraph and the proxy but | 
|  | 519 | // not the SCC analysis. | 
|  | 520 | MPM.addPass(LambdaModulePass([&](Module &M, ModuleAnalysisManager &) { | 
|  | 521 | PreservedAnalyses PA; | 
|  | 522 | PA.preserve<LazyCallGraphAnalysis>(); | 
|  | 523 | PA.preserve<CGSCCAnalysisManagerModuleProxy>(); | 
|  | 524 | PA.preserve<FunctionAnalysisManagerModuleProxy>(); | 
|  | 525 | return PA; | 
|  | 526 | })); | 
|  | 527 |  | 
|  | 528 | // And now a second CGSCC run which requires the SCC analysis again. This | 
|  | 529 | // will trigger re-running it. | 
|  | 530 | CGSCCPassManager CGPM2(/*DebugLogging*/ true); | 
|  | 531 | CGPM2.addPass(RequireAnalysisPass<TestSCCAnalysis, LazyCallGraph::SCC, | 
|  | 532 | CGSCCAnalysisManager, LazyCallGraph &, | 
|  | 533 | CGSCCUpdateResult &>()); | 
|  | 534 | MPM.addPass(createModuleToPostOrderCGSCCPassAdaptor(std::move(CGPM2))); | 
|  | 535 |  | 
|  | 536 | MPM.run(*M, MAM); | 
|  | 537 | // Two runs and four SCCs. | 
|  | 538 | EXPECT_EQ(2 * 4, SCCAnalysisRuns); | 
|  | 539 | } | 
|  | 540 |  | 
|  | 541 | // Check that marking the SCC analysis preserved is sufficient to avoid | 
|  | 542 | // invaliadtion. This should only run the analysis once for each SCC. | 
|  | 543 | TEST_F(CGSCCPassManagerTest, TestModulePassCanPreserveSCCAnalysis) { | 
|  | 544 | int SCCAnalysisRuns = 0; | 
|  | 545 | CGAM.registerPass([&] { return TestSCCAnalysis(SCCAnalysisRuns); }); | 
|  | 546 |  | 
|  | 547 | ModulePassManager MPM(/*DebugLogging*/ true); | 
|  | 548 |  | 
|  | 549 | // First force the analysis to be run. | 
|  | 550 | CGSCCPassManager CGPM1(/*DebugLogging*/ true); | 
|  | 551 | CGPM1.addPass(RequireAnalysisPass<TestSCCAnalysis, LazyCallGraph::SCC, | 
|  | 552 | CGSCCAnalysisManager, LazyCallGraph &, | 
|  | 553 | CGSCCUpdateResult &>()); | 
|  | 554 | MPM.addPass(createModuleToPostOrderCGSCCPassAdaptor(std::move(CGPM1))); | 
|  | 555 |  | 
|  | 556 | // Now run a module pass that preserves each of the necessary components | 
|  | 557 | // (but not everything). | 
|  | 558 | MPM.addPass(LambdaModulePass([&](Module &M, ModuleAnalysisManager &) { | 
|  | 559 | PreservedAnalyses PA; | 
|  | 560 | PA.preserve<LazyCallGraphAnalysis>(); | 
|  | 561 | PA.preserve<CGSCCAnalysisManagerModuleProxy>(); | 
|  | 562 | PA.preserve<FunctionAnalysisManagerModuleProxy>(); | 
|  | 563 | PA.preserve<TestSCCAnalysis>(); | 
|  | 564 | return PA; | 
|  | 565 | })); | 
|  | 566 |  | 
|  | 567 | // And now a second CGSCC run which requires the SCC analysis again but find | 
|  | 568 | // it in the cache. | 
|  | 569 | CGSCCPassManager CGPM2(/*DebugLogging*/ true); | 
|  | 570 | CGPM2.addPass(RequireAnalysisPass<TestSCCAnalysis, LazyCallGraph::SCC, | 
|  | 571 | CGSCCAnalysisManager, LazyCallGraph &, | 
|  | 572 | CGSCCUpdateResult &>()); | 
|  | 573 | MPM.addPass(createModuleToPostOrderCGSCCPassAdaptor(std::move(CGPM2))); | 
|  | 574 |  | 
|  | 575 | MPM.run(*M, MAM); | 
|  | 576 | // Four SCCs | 
|  | 577 | EXPECT_EQ(4, SCCAnalysisRuns); | 
|  | 578 | } | 
|  | 579 |  | 
|  | 580 | // Check that even when the analysis is preserved, if the SCC information isn't | 
|  | 581 | // we still nuke things because the SCC keys could change. | 
|  | 582 | TEST_F(CGSCCPassManagerTest, TestModulePassInvalidatesSCCAnalysisOnCGChange) { | 
|  | 583 | int SCCAnalysisRuns = 0; | 
|  | 584 | CGAM.registerPass([&] { return TestSCCAnalysis(SCCAnalysisRuns); }); | 
|  | 585 |  | 
|  | 586 | ModulePassManager MPM(/*DebugLogging*/ true); | 
|  | 587 |  | 
|  | 588 | // First force the analysis to be run. | 
|  | 589 | CGSCCPassManager CGPM1(/*DebugLogging*/ true); | 
|  | 590 | CGPM1.addPass(RequireAnalysisPass<TestSCCAnalysis, LazyCallGraph::SCC, | 
|  | 591 | CGSCCAnalysisManager, LazyCallGraph &, | 
|  | 592 | CGSCCUpdateResult &>()); | 
|  | 593 | MPM.addPass(createModuleToPostOrderCGSCCPassAdaptor(std::move(CGPM1))); | 
|  | 594 |  | 
|  | 595 | // Now run a module pass that preserves the analysis but not the call | 
|  | 596 | // graph or proxy. | 
|  | 597 | MPM.addPass(LambdaModulePass([&](Module &M, ModuleAnalysisManager &) { | 
|  | 598 | PreservedAnalyses PA; | 
|  | 599 | PA.preserve<TestSCCAnalysis>(); | 
|  | 600 | return PA; | 
|  | 601 | })); | 
|  | 602 |  | 
|  | 603 | // And now a second CGSCC run which requires the SCC analysis again. | 
|  | 604 | CGSCCPassManager CGPM2(/*DebugLogging*/ true); | 
|  | 605 | CGPM2.addPass(RequireAnalysisPass<TestSCCAnalysis, LazyCallGraph::SCC, | 
|  | 606 | CGSCCAnalysisManager, LazyCallGraph &, | 
|  | 607 | CGSCCUpdateResult &>()); | 
|  | 608 | MPM.addPass(createModuleToPostOrderCGSCCPassAdaptor(std::move(CGPM2))); | 
|  | 609 |  | 
|  | 610 | MPM.run(*M, MAM); | 
|  | 611 | // Two runs and four SCCs. | 
|  | 612 | EXPECT_EQ(2 * 4, SCCAnalysisRuns); | 
|  | 613 | } | 
|  | 614 |  | 
|  | 615 | // Test that an SCC pass which fails to preserve a Function analysis in fact | 
|  | 616 | // invalidates that analysis. | 
|  | 617 | TEST_F(CGSCCPassManagerTest, TestSCCPassInvalidatesFunctionAnalysis) { | 
|  | 618 | int FunctionAnalysisRuns = 0; | 
|  | 619 | FAM.registerPass([&] { return TestFunctionAnalysis(FunctionAnalysisRuns); }); | 
|  | 620 |  | 
|  | 621 | // Create a very simple module with a single function and SCC to make testing | 
|  | 622 | // these issues much easier. | 
|  | 623 | std::unique_ptr<Module> M = parseIR("declare void @g()\n" | 
|  | 624 | "declare void @h()\n" | 
|  | 625 | "define void @f() {\n" | 
|  | 626 | "entry:\n" | 
|  | 627 | "  call void @g()\n" | 
|  | 628 | "  call void @h()\n" | 
|  | 629 | "  ret void\n" | 
|  | 630 | "}\n"); | 
|  | 631 |  | 
|  | 632 | CGSCCPassManager CGPM(/*DebugLogging*/ true); | 
|  | 633 |  | 
|  | 634 | // First force the analysis to be run. | 
|  | 635 | FunctionPassManager FPM1(/*DebugLogging*/ true); | 
|  | 636 | FPM1.addPass(RequireAnalysisPass<TestFunctionAnalysis, Function>()); | 
|  | 637 | CGPM.addPass(createCGSCCToFunctionPassAdaptor(std::move(FPM1))); | 
|  | 638 |  | 
|  | 639 | // Now run a module pass that preserves the LazyCallGraph and proxy but not | 
|  | 640 | // the SCC analysis. | 
|  | 641 | CGPM.addPass(LambdaSCCPass([&](LazyCallGraph::SCC &C, CGSCCAnalysisManager &, | 
|  | 642 | LazyCallGraph &, CGSCCUpdateResult &) { | 
|  | 643 | PreservedAnalyses PA; | 
|  | 644 | PA.preserve<LazyCallGraphAnalysis>(); | 
|  | 645 | return PA; | 
|  | 646 | })); | 
|  | 647 |  | 
|  | 648 | // And now a second CGSCC run which requires the SCC analysis again. This | 
|  | 649 | // will trigger re-running it. | 
|  | 650 | FunctionPassManager FPM2(/*DebugLogging*/ true); | 
|  | 651 | FPM2.addPass(RequireAnalysisPass<TestFunctionAnalysis, Function>()); | 
|  | 652 | CGPM.addPass(createCGSCCToFunctionPassAdaptor(std::move(FPM2))); | 
|  | 653 |  | 
|  | 654 | ModulePassManager MPM(/*DebugLogging*/ true); | 
|  | 655 | MPM.addPass(createModuleToPostOrderCGSCCPassAdaptor(std::move(CGPM))); | 
|  | 656 | MPM.run(*M, MAM); | 
|  | 657 | EXPECT_EQ(2, FunctionAnalysisRuns); | 
|  | 658 | } | 
|  | 659 |  | 
|  | 660 | // Check that marking the SCC analysis preserved is sufficient. This should | 
|  | 661 | // only run the analysis once the SCC. | 
|  | 662 | TEST_F(CGSCCPassManagerTest, TestSCCPassCanPreserveFunctionAnalysis) { | 
|  | 663 | int FunctionAnalysisRuns = 0; | 
|  | 664 | FAM.registerPass([&] { return TestFunctionAnalysis(FunctionAnalysisRuns); }); | 
|  | 665 |  | 
|  | 666 | // Create a very simple module with a single function and SCC to make testing | 
|  | 667 | // these issues much easier. | 
|  | 668 | std::unique_ptr<Module> M = parseIR("declare void @g()\n" | 
|  | 669 | "declare void @h()\n" | 
|  | 670 | "define void @f() {\n" | 
|  | 671 | "entry:\n" | 
|  | 672 | "  call void @g()\n" | 
|  | 673 | "  call void @h()\n" | 
|  | 674 | "  ret void\n" | 
|  | 675 | "}\n"); | 
|  | 676 |  | 
|  | 677 | CGSCCPassManager CGPM(/*DebugLogging*/ true); | 
|  | 678 |  | 
|  | 679 | // First force the analysis to be run. | 
|  | 680 | FunctionPassManager FPM1(/*DebugLogging*/ true); | 
|  | 681 | FPM1.addPass(RequireAnalysisPass<TestFunctionAnalysis, Function>()); | 
|  | 682 | CGPM.addPass(createCGSCCToFunctionPassAdaptor(std::move(FPM1))); | 
|  | 683 |  | 
|  | 684 | // Now run a module pass that preserves each of the necessary components | 
|  | 685 | // (but | 
|  | 686 | // not everything). | 
|  | 687 | CGPM.addPass(LambdaSCCPass([&](LazyCallGraph::SCC &C, CGSCCAnalysisManager &, | 
|  | 688 | LazyCallGraph &, CGSCCUpdateResult &) { | 
|  | 689 | PreservedAnalyses PA; | 
|  | 690 | PA.preserve<LazyCallGraphAnalysis>(); | 
| Chandler Carruth | bd9c290 | 2017-07-09 03:59:31 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 691 | PA.preserve<FunctionAnalysisManagerCGSCCProxy>(); | 
| Chandler Carruth | 6b98164 | 2016-12-10 06:34:44 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 692 | PA.preserve<TestFunctionAnalysis>(); | 
|  | 693 | return PA; | 
|  | 694 | })); | 
|  | 695 |  | 
|  | 696 | // And now a second CGSCC run which requires the SCC analysis again but find | 
|  | 697 | // it in the cache. | 
|  | 698 | FunctionPassManager FPM2(/*DebugLogging*/ true); | 
|  | 699 | FPM2.addPass(RequireAnalysisPass<TestFunctionAnalysis, Function>()); | 
|  | 700 | CGPM.addPass(createCGSCCToFunctionPassAdaptor(std::move(FPM2))); | 
|  | 701 |  | 
|  | 702 | ModulePassManager MPM(/*DebugLogging*/ true); | 
|  | 703 | MPM.addPass(createModuleToPostOrderCGSCCPassAdaptor(std::move(CGPM))); | 
|  | 704 | MPM.run(*M, MAM); | 
|  | 705 | EXPECT_EQ(1, FunctionAnalysisRuns); | 
|  | 706 | } | 
|  | 707 |  | 
|  | 708 | // Note that there is no test for invalidating the call graph or other | 
|  | 709 | // structure with an SCC pass because there is no mechanism to do that from | 
|  | 710 | // withinsuch a pass. Instead, such a pass has to directly update the call | 
|  | 711 | // graph structure. | 
|  | 712 |  | 
|  | 713 | // Test that a madule pass invalidates function analyses when the CGSCC proxies | 
|  | 714 | // and pass manager. | 
|  | 715 | TEST_F(CGSCCPassManagerTest, | 
|  | 716 | TestModulePassInvalidatesFunctionAnalysisNestedInCGSCC) { | 
|  | 717 | MAM.registerPass([&] { return LazyCallGraphAnalysis(); }); | 
|  | 718 |  | 
|  | 719 | int FunctionAnalysisRuns = 0; | 
|  | 720 | FAM.registerPass([&] { return TestFunctionAnalysis(FunctionAnalysisRuns); }); | 
|  | 721 |  | 
|  | 722 | ModulePassManager MPM(/*DebugLogging*/ true); | 
|  | 723 |  | 
|  | 724 | // First force the analysis to be run. | 
|  | 725 | FunctionPassManager FPM1(/*DebugLogging*/ true); | 
|  | 726 | FPM1.addPass(RequireAnalysisPass<TestFunctionAnalysis, Function>()); | 
|  | 727 | CGSCCPassManager CGPM1(/*DebugLogging*/ true); | 
|  | 728 | CGPM1.addPass(createCGSCCToFunctionPassAdaptor(std::move(FPM1))); | 
|  | 729 | MPM.addPass(createModuleToPostOrderCGSCCPassAdaptor(std::move(CGPM1))); | 
|  | 730 |  | 
| Chandler Carruth | bd9c290 | 2017-07-09 03:59:31 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 731 | // Now run a module pass that preserves the LazyCallGraph and proxies but not | 
| Chandler Carruth | 6b98164 | 2016-12-10 06:34:44 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 732 | // the Function analysis. | 
|  | 733 | MPM.addPass(LambdaModulePass([&](Module &M, ModuleAnalysisManager &) { | 
|  | 734 | PreservedAnalyses PA; | 
|  | 735 | PA.preserve<LazyCallGraphAnalysis>(); | 
|  | 736 | PA.preserve<CGSCCAnalysisManagerModuleProxy>(); | 
| Chandler Carruth | bd9c290 | 2017-07-09 03:59:31 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 737 | PA.preserve<FunctionAnalysisManagerCGSCCProxy>(); | 
|  | 738 | PA.preserve<FunctionAnalysisManagerModuleProxy>(); | 
| Chandler Carruth | 6b98164 | 2016-12-10 06:34:44 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 739 | return PA; | 
|  | 740 | })); | 
|  | 741 |  | 
|  | 742 | // And now a second CGSCC run which requires the SCC analysis again. This | 
|  | 743 | // will trigger re-running it. | 
|  | 744 | FunctionPassManager FPM2(/*DebugLogging*/ true); | 
|  | 745 | FPM2.addPass(RequireAnalysisPass<TestFunctionAnalysis, Function>()); | 
|  | 746 | CGSCCPassManager CGPM2(/*DebugLogging*/ true); | 
|  | 747 | CGPM2.addPass(createCGSCCToFunctionPassAdaptor(std::move(FPM2))); | 
|  | 748 | MPM.addPass(createModuleToPostOrderCGSCCPassAdaptor(std::move(CGPM2))); | 
|  | 749 |  | 
|  | 750 | MPM.run(*M, MAM); | 
|  | 751 | // Two runs and 6 functions. | 
|  | 752 | EXPECT_EQ(2 * 6, FunctionAnalysisRuns); | 
|  | 753 | } | 
|  | 754 |  | 
| Chandler Carruth | bd9c290 | 2017-07-09 03:59:31 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 755 | // Check that by marking the function pass and proxies as preserved, this | 
| Chandler Carruth | 6b98164 | 2016-12-10 06:34:44 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 756 | // propagates all the way through. | 
|  | 757 | TEST_F(CGSCCPassManagerTest, | 
|  | 758 | TestModulePassCanPreserveFunctionAnalysisNestedInCGSCC) { | 
|  | 759 | MAM.registerPass([&] { return LazyCallGraphAnalysis(); }); | 
|  | 760 |  | 
|  | 761 | int FunctionAnalysisRuns = 0; | 
|  | 762 | FAM.registerPass([&] { return TestFunctionAnalysis(FunctionAnalysisRuns); }); | 
|  | 763 |  | 
|  | 764 | ModulePassManager MPM(/*DebugLogging*/ true); | 
|  | 765 |  | 
|  | 766 | // First force the analysis to be run. | 
|  | 767 | FunctionPassManager FPM1(/*DebugLogging*/ true); | 
|  | 768 | FPM1.addPass(RequireAnalysisPass<TestFunctionAnalysis, Function>()); | 
|  | 769 | CGSCCPassManager CGPM1(/*DebugLogging*/ true); | 
|  | 770 | CGPM1.addPass(createCGSCCToFunctionPassAdaptor(std::move(FPM1))); | 
|  | 771 | MPM.addPass(createModuleToPostOrderCGSCCPassAdaptor(std::move(CGPM1))); | 
|  | 772 |  | 
|  | 773 | // Now run a module pass that preserves the LazyCallGraph, the proxy, and | 
|  | 774 | // the Function analysis. | 
|  | 775 | MPM.addPass(LambdaModulePass([&](Module &M, ModuleAnalysisManager &) { | 
|  | 776 | PreservedAnalyses PA; | 
|  | 777 | PA.preserve<LazyCallGraphAnalysis>(); | 
|  | 778 | PA.preserve<CGSCCAnalysisManagerModuleProxy>(); | 
| Chandler Carruth | bd9c290 | 2017-07-09 03:59:31 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 779 | PA.preserve<FunctionAnalysisManagerCGSCCProxy>(); | 
| Chandler Carruth | 6b98164 | 2016-12-10 06:34:44 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 780 | PA.preserve<FunctionAnalysisManagerModuleProxy>(); | 
|  | 781 | PA.preserve<TestFunctionAnalysis>(); | 
|  | 782 | return PA; | 
|  | 783 | })); | 
|  | 784 |  | 
|  | 785 | // And now a second CGSCC run which requires the SCC analysis again. This | 
|  | 786 | // will trigger re-running it. | 
|  | 787 | FunctionPassManager FPM2(/*DebugLogging*/ true); | 
|  | 788 | FPM2.addPass(RequireAnalysisPass<TestFunctionAnalysis, Function>()); | 
|  | 789 | CGSCCPassManager CGPM2(/*DebugLogging*/ true); | 
|  | 790 | CGPM2.addPass(createCGSCCToFunctionPassAdaptor(std::move(FPM2))); | 
|  | 791 | MPM.addPass(createModuleToPostOrderCGSCCPassAdaptor(std::move(CGPM2))); | 
|  | 792 |  | 
|  | 793 | MPM.run(*M, MAM); | 
|  | 794 | // One run and 6 functions. | 
|  | 795 | EXPECT_EQ(6, FunctionAnalysisRuns); | 
|  | 796 | } | 
|  | 797 |  | 
|  | 798 | // Check that if the lazy call graph itself isn't preserved we still manage to | 
|  | 799 | // invalidate everything. | 
|  | 800 | TEST_F(CGSCCPassManagerTest, | 
|  | 801 | TestModulePassInvalidatesFunctionAnalysisNestedInCGSCCOnCGChange) { | 
|  | 802 | MAM.registerPass([&] { return LazyCallGraphAnalysis(); }); | 
|  | 803 |  | 
|  | 804 | int FunctionAnalysisRuns = 0; | 
|  | 805 | FAM.registerPass([&] { return TestFunctionAnalysis(FunctionAnalysisRuns); }); | 
|  | 806 |  | 
|  | 807 | ModulePassManager MPM(/*DebugLogging*/ true); | 
|  | 808 |  | 
|  | 809 | // First force the analysis to be run. | 
|  | 810 | FunctionPassManager FPM1(/*DebugLogging*/ true); | 
|  | 811 | FPM1.addPass(RequireAnalysisPass<TestFunctionAnalysis, Function>()); | 
|  | 812 | CGSCCPassManager CGPM1(/*DebugLogging*/ true); | 
|  | 813 | CGPM1.addPass(createCGSCCToFunctionPassAdaptor(std::move(FPM1))); | 
|  | 814 | MPM.addPass(createModuleToPostOrderCGSCCPassAdaptor(std::move(CGPM1))); | 
|  | 815 |  | 
|  | 816 | // Now run a module pass that preserves the LazyCallGraph but not the | 
|  | 817 | // Function analysis. | 
|  | 818 | MPM.addPass(LambdaModulePass([&](Module &M, ModuleAnalysisManager &) { | 
|  | 819 | PreservedAnalyses PA; | 
|  | 820 | return PA; | 
|  | 821 | })); | 
|  | 822 |  | 
|  | 823 | // And now a second CGSCC run which requires the SCC analysis again. This | 
|  | 824 | // will trigger re-running it. | 
|  | 825 | FunctionPassManager FPM2(/*DebugLogging*/ true); | 
|  | 826 | FPM2.addPass(RequireAnalysisPass<TestFunctionAnalysis, Function>()); | 
|  | 827 | CGSCCPassManager CGPM2(/*DebugLogging*/ true); | 
|  | 828 | CGPM2.addPass(createCGSCCToFunctionPassAdaptor(std::move(FPM2))); | 
|  | 829 | MPM.addPass(createModuleToPostOrderCGSCCPassAdaptor(std::move(CGPM2))); | 
|  | 830 |  | 
|  | 831 | MPM.run(*M, MAM); | 
|  | 832 | // Two runs and 6 functions. | 
|  | 833 | EXPECT_EQ(2 * 6, FunctionAnalysisRuns); | 
|  | 834 | } | 
| Chandler Carruth | ba90ae9 | 2016-12-27 08:40:39 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 835 |  | 
|  | 836 | /// A test CGSCC-level analysis pass which caches in its result another | 
|  | 837 | /// analysis pass and uses it to serve queries. This requires the result to | 
|  | 838 | /// invalidate itself when its dependency is invalidated. | 
|  | 839 | /// | 
|  | 840 | /// FIXME: Currently this doesn't also depend on a function analysis, and if it | 
|  | 841 | /// did we would fail to invalidate it correctly. | 
|  | 842 | struct TestIndirectSCCAnalysis | 
|  | 843 | : public AnalysisInfoMixin<TestIndirectSCCAnalysis> { | 
|  | 844 | struct Result { | 
|  | 845 | Result(TestSCCAnalysis::Result &SCCDep, TestModuleAnalysis::Result &MDep) | 
|  | 846 | : SCCDep(SCCDep), MDep(MDep) {} | 
|  | 847 | TestSCCAnalysis::Result &SCCDep; | 
|  | 848 | TestModuleAnalysis::Result &MDep; | 
|  | 849 |  | 
|  | 850 | bool invalidate(LazyCallGraph::SCC &C, const PreservedAnalyses &PA, | 
|  | 851 | CGSCCAnalysisManager::Invalidator &Inv) { | 
|  | 852 | auto PAC = PA.getChecker<TestIndirectSCCAnalysis>(); | 
|  | 853 | return !(PAC.preserved() || | 
|  | 854 | PAC.preservedSet<AllAnalysesOn<LazyCallGraph::SCC>>()) || | 
|  | 855 | Inv.invalidate<TestSCCAnalysis>(C, PA); | 
|  | 856 | } | 
|  | 857 | }; | 
|  | 858 |  | 
|  | 859 | TestIndirectSCCAnalysis(int &Runs) : Runs(Runs) {} | 
|  | 860 |  | 
|  | 861 | /// Run the analysis pass over the function and return a result. | 
|  | 862 | Result run(LazyCallGraph::SCC &C, CGSCCAnalysisManager &AM, | 
|  | 863 | LazyCallGraph &CG) { | 
|  | 864 | ++Runs; | 
|  | 865 | auto &SCCDep = AM.getResult<TestSCCAnalysis>(C, CG); | 
|  | 866 |  | 
|  | 867 | auto &ModuleProxy = AM.getResult<ModuleAnalysisManagerCGSCCProxy>(C, CG); | 
|  | 868 | const ModuleAnalysisManager &MAM = ModuleProxy.getManager(); | 
|  | 869 | // For the test, we insist that the module analysis starts off in the | 
|  | 870 | // cache. | 
|  | 871 | auto &MDep = *MAM.getCachedResult<TestModuleAnalysis>( | 
|  | 872 | *C.begin()->getFunction().getParent()); | 
|  | 873 | // Register the dependency as module analysis dependencies have to be | 
|  | 874 | // pre-registered on the proxy. | 
|  | 875 | ModuleProxy.registerOuterAnalysisInvalidation<TestModuleAnalysis, | 
|  | 876 | TestIndirectSCCAnalysis>(); | 
|  | 877 |  | 
|  | 878 | return Result(SCCDep, MDep); | 
|  | 879 | } | 
|  | 880 |  | 
|  | 881 | private: | 
|  | 882 | friend AnalysisInfoMixin<TestIndirectSCCAnalysis>; | 
|  | 883 | static AnalysisKey Key; | 
|  | 884 |  | 
|  | 885 | int &Runs; | 
|  | 886 | }; | 
|  | 887 |  | 
|  | 888 | AnalysisKey TestIndirectSCCAnalysis::Key; | 
|  | 889 |  | 
|  | 890 | /// A test analysis pass which caches in its result the result from the above | 
|  | 891 | /// indirect analysis pass. | 
|  | 892 | /// | 
|  | 893 | /// This allows us to ensure that whenever an analysis pass is invalidated due | 
|  | 894 | /// to dependencies (especially dependencies across IR units that trigger | 
|  | 895 | /// asynchronous invalidation) we correctly detect that this may in turn cause | 
|  | 896 | /// other analysis to be invalidated. | 
|  | 897 | struct TestDoublyIndirectSCCAnalysis | 
|  | 898 | : public AnalysisInfoMixin<TestDoublyIndirectSCCAnalysis> { | 
|  | 899 | struct Result { | 
|  | 900 | Result(TestIndirectSCCAnalysis::Result &IDep) : IDep(IDep) {} | 
|  | 901 | TestIndirectSCCAnalysis::Result &IDep; | 
|  | 902 |  | 
|  | 903 | bool invalidate(LazyCallGraph::SCC &C, const PreservedAnalyses &PA, | 
|  | 904 | CGSCCAnalysisManager::Invalidator &Inv) { | 
|  | 905 | auto PAC = PA.getChecker<TestDoublyIndirectSCCAnalysis>(); | 
|  | 906 | return !(PAC.preserved() || | 
|  | 907 | PAC.preservedSet<AllAnalysesOn<LazyCallGraph::SCC>>()) || | 
|  | 908 | Inv.invalidate<TestIndirectSCCAnalysis>(C, PA); | 
|  | 909 | } | 
|  | 910 | }; | 
|  | 911 |  | 
|  | 912 | TestDoublyIndirectSCCAnalysis(int &Runs) : Runs(Runs) {} | 
|  | 913 |  | 
|  | 914 | /// Run the analysis pass over the function and return a result. | 
|  | 915 | Result run(LazyCallGraph::SCC &C, CGSCCAnalysisManager &AM, | 
|  | 916 | LazyCallGraph &CG) { | 
|  | 917 | ++Runs; | 
|  | 918 | auto &IDep = AM.getResult<TestIndirectSCCAnalysis>(C, CG); | 
|  | 919 | return Result(IDep); | 
|  | 920 | } | 
|  | 921 |  | 
|  | 922 | private: | 
|  | 923 | friend AnalysisInfoMixin<TestDoublyIndirectSCCAnalysis>; | 
|  | 924 | static AnalysisKey Key; | 
|  | 925 |  | 
|  | 926 | int &Runs; | 
|  | 927 | }; | 
|  | 928 |  | 
|  | 929 | AnalysisKey TestDoublyIndirectSCCAnalysis::Key; | 
|  | 930 |  | 
|  | 931 | /// A test analysis pass which caches results from three different IR unit | 
|  | 932 | /// layers and requires intermediate layers to correctly propagate the entire | 
|  | 933 | /// distance. | 
|  | 934 | struct TestIndirectFunctionAnalysis | 
|  | 935 | : public AnalysisInfoMixin<TestIndirectFunctionAnalysis> { | 
|  | 936 | struct Result { | 
|  | 937 | Result(TestFunctionAnalysis::Result &FDep, TestModuleAnalysis::Result &MDep, | 
|  | 938 | TestSCCAnalysis::Result &SCCDep) | 
|  | 939 | : FDep(FDep), MDep(MDep), SCCDep(SCCDep) {} | 
|  | 940 | TestFunctionAnalysis::Result &FDep; | 
|  | 941 | TestModuleAnalysis::Result &MDep; | 
|  | 942 | TestSCCAnalysis::Result &SCCDep; | 
|  | 943 |  | 
|  | 944 | bool invalidate(Function &F, const PreservedAnalyses &PA, | 
|  | 945 | FunctionAnalysisManager::Invalidator &Inv) { | 
|  | 946 | auto PAC = PA.getChecker<TestIndirectFunctionAnalysis>(); | 
|  | 947 | return !(PAC.preserved() || | 
|  | 948 | PAC.preservedSet<AllAnalysesOn<Function>>()) || | 
|  | 949 | Inv.invalidate<TestFunctionAnalysis>(F, PA); | 
|  | 950 | } | 
|  | 951 | }; | 
|  | 952 |  | 
|  | 953 | TestIndirectFunctionAnalysis(int &Runs) : Runs(Runs) {} | 
|  | 954 |  | 
|  | 955 | /// Run the analysis pass over the function and return a result. | 
|  | 956 | Result run(Function &F, FunctionAnalysisManager &AM) { | 
|  | 957 | ++Runs; | 
|  | 958 | auto &FDep = AM.getResult<TestFunctionAnalysis>(F); | 
|  | 959 |  | 
|  | 960 | auto &ModuleProxy = AM.getResult<ModuleAnalysisManagerFunctionProxy>(F); | 
|  | 961 | const ModuleAnalysisManager &MAM = ModuleProxy.getManager(); | 
|  | 962 | // For the test, we insist that the module analysis starts off in the | 
|  | 963 | // cache. | 
|  | 964 | auto &MDep = *MAM.getCachedResult<TestModuleAnalysis>(*F.getParent()); | 
|  | 965 | // Register the dependency as module analysis dependencies have to be | 
|  | 966 | // pre-registered on the proxy. | 
|  | 967 | ModuleProxy.registerOuterAnalysisInvalidation< | 
|  | 968 | TestModuleAnalysis, TestIndirectFunctionAnalysis>(); | 
|  | 969 |  | 
|  | 970 | // For thet test we assume this is run inside a CGSCC pass manager. | 
|  | 971 | const LazyCallGraph &CG = | 
|  | 972 | *MAM.getCachedResult<LazyCallGraphAnalysis>(*F.getParent()); | 
|  | 973 | auto &CGSCCProxy = AM.getResult<CGSCCAnalysisManagerFunctionProxy>(F); | 
|  | 974 | const CGSCCAnalysisManager &CGAM = CGSCCProxy.getManager(); | 
|  | 975 | // For the test, we insist that the CGSCC analysis starts off in the cache. | 
|  | 976 | auto &SCCDep = | 
|  | 977 | *CGAM.getCachedResult<TestSCCAnalysis>(*CG.lookupSCC(*CG.lookup(F))); | 
|  | 978 | // Register the dependency as CGSCC analysis dependencies have to be | 
|  | 979 | // pre-registered on the proxy. | 
|  | 980 | CGSCCProxy.registerOuterAnalysisInvalidation< | 
|  | 981 | TestSCCAnalysis, TestIndirectFunctionAnalysis>(); | 
|  | 982 |  | 
|  | 983 | return Result(FDep, MDep, SCCDep); | 
|  | 984 | } | 
|  | 985 |  | 
|  | 986 | private: | 
|  | 987 | friend AnalysisInfoMixin<TestIndirectFunctionAnalysis>; | 
|  | 988 | static AnalysisKey Key; | 
|  | 989 |  | 
|  | 990 | int &Runs; | 
|  | 991 | }; | 
|  | 992 |  | 
|  | 993 | AnalysisKey TestIndirectFunctionAnalysis::Key; | 
|  | 994 |  | 
|  | 995 | TEST_F(CGSCCPassManagerTest, TestIndirectAnalysisInvalidation) { | 
|  | 996 | int ModuleAnalysisRuns = 0; | 
|  | 997 | MAM.registerPass([&] { return TestModuleAnalysis(ModuleAnalysisRuns); }); | 
|  | 998 |  | 
|  | 999 | int SCCAnalysisRuns = 0, IndirectSCCAnalysisRuns = 0, | 
|  | 1000 | DoublyIndirectSCCAnalysisRuns = 0; | 
|  | 1001 | CGAM.registerPass([&] { return TestSCCAnalysis(SCCAnalysisRuns); }); | 
|  | 1002 | CGAM.registerPass( | 
|  | 1003 | [&] { return TestIndirectSCCAnalysis(IndirectSCCAnalysisRuns); }); | 
|  | 1004 | CGAM.registerPass([&] { | 
|  | 1005 | return TestDoublyIndirectSCCAnalysis(DoublyIndirectSCCAnalysisRuns); | 
|  | 1006 | }); | 
|  | 1007 |  | 
|  | 1008 | int FunctionAnalysisRuns = 0, IndirectFunctionAnalysisRuns = 0; | 
|  | 1009 | FAM.registerPass([&] { return TestFunctionAnalysis(FunctionAnalysisRuns); }); | 
|  | 1010 | FAM.registerPass([&] { | 
|  | 1011 | return TestIndirectFunctionAnalysis(IndirectFunctionAnalysisRuns); | 
|  | 1012 | }); | 
|  | 1013 |  | 
|  | 1014 | ModulePassManager MPM(/*DebugLogging*/ true); | 
|  | 1015 |  | 
|  | 1016 | int FunctionCount = 0; | 
|  | 1017 | CGSCCPassManager CGPM(/*DebugLogging*/ true); | 
|  | 1018 | // First just use the analysis to get the function count and preserve | 
|  | 1019 | // everything. | 
|  | 1020 | CGPM.addPass( | 
|  | 1021 | LambdaSCCPass([&](LazyCallGraph::SCC &C, CGSCCAnalysisManager &AM, | 
|  | 1022 | LazyCallGraph &CG, CGSCCUpdateResult &) { | 
|  | 1023 | auto &DoublyIndirectResult = | 
|  | 1024 | AM.getResult<TestDoublyIndirectSCCAnalysis>(C, CG); | 
|  | 1025 | auto &IndirectResult = DoublyIndirectResult.IDep; | 
|  | 1026 | FunctionCount += IndirectResult.SCCDep.FunctionCount; | 
|  | 1027 | return PreservedAnalyses::all(); | 
|  | 1028 | })); | 
| Chandler Carruth | bd9c290 | 2017-07-09 03:59:31 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 1029 | CGPM.addPass(createCGSCCToFunctionPassAdaptor( | 
|  | 1030 | RequireAnalysisPass<TestIndirectFunctionAnalysis, Function>())); | 
|  | 1031 |  | 
| Chandler Carruth | ba90ae9 | 2016-12-27 08:40:39 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 1032 | // Next, invalidate | 
|  | 1033 | //   - both analyses for the (f) and (x) SCCs, | 
|  | 1034 | //   - just the underlying (indirect) analysis for (g) SCC, and | 
|  | 1035 | //   - just the direct analysis for (h1,h2,h3) SCC. | 
|  | 1036 | CGPM.addPass( | 
|  | 1037 | LambdaSCCPass([&](LazyCallGraph::SCC &C, CGSCCAnalysisManager &AM, | 
|  | 1038 | LazyCallGraph &CG, CGSCCUpdateResult &) { | 
|  | 1039 | auto &DoublyIndirectResult = | 
|  | 1040 | AM.getResult<TestDoublyIndirectSCCAnalysis>(C, CG); | 
|  | 1041 | auto &IndirectResult = DoublyIndirectResult.IDep; | 
|  | 1042 | FunctionCount += IndirectResult.SCCDep.FunctionCount; | 
|  | 1043 | auto PA = PreservedAnalyses::none(); | 
| Chandler Carruth | bd9c290 | 2017-07-09 03:59:31 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 1044 | PA.preserve<FunctionAnalysisManagerCGSCCProxy>(); | 
|  | 1045 | PA.preserveSet<AllAnalysesOn<Function>>(); | 
| Chandler Carruth | ba90ae9 | 2016-12-27 08:40:39 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 1046 | if (C.getName() == "(g)") | 
|  | 1047 | PA.preserve<TestSCCAnalysis>(); | 
|  | 1048 | else if (C.getName() == "(h3, h1, h2)") | 
|  | 1049 | PA.preserve<TestIndirectSCCAnalysis>(); | 
|  | 1050 | return PA; | 
|  | 1051 | })); | 
| Chandler Carruth | bd9c290 | 2017-07-09 03:59:31 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 1052 | // Finally, use the analysis again on each SCC (and function), forcing | 
|  | 1053 | // re-computation for all of them. | 
| Chandler Carruth | ba90ae9 | 2016-12-27 08:40:39 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 1054 | CGPM.addPass( | 
|  | 1055 | LambdaSCCPass([&](LazyCallGraph::SCC &C, CGSCCAnalysisManager &AM, | 
|  | 1056 | LazyCallGraph &CG, CGSCCUpdateResult &) { | 
|  | 1057 | auto &DoublyIndirectResult = | 
|  | 1058 | AM.getResult<TestDoublyIndirectSCCAnalysis>(C, CG); | 
|  | 1059 | auto &IndirectResult = DoublyIndirectResult.IDep; | 
|  | 1060 | FunctionCount += IndirectResult.SCCDep.FunctionCount; | 
|  | 1061 | return PreservedAnalyses::all(); | 
|  | 1062 | })); | 
| Chandler Carruth | bd9c290 | 2017-07-09 03:59:31 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 1063 | CGPM.addPass(createCGSCCToFunctionPassAdaptor( | 
|  | 1064 | RequireAnalysisPass<TestIndirectFunctionAnalysis, Function>())); | 
| Chandler Carruth | ba90ae9 | 2016-12-27 08:40:39 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 1065 |  | 
|  | 1066 | // Create a second CGSCC pass manager. This will cause the module-level | 
|  | 1067 | // invalidation to occur, which will force yet another invalidation of the | 
|  | 1068 | // indirect SCC-level analysis as the module analysis it depends on gets | 
|  | 1069 | // invalidated. | 
|  | 1070 | CGSCCPassManager CGPM2(/*DebugLogging*/ true); | 
|  | 1071 | CGPM2.addPass( | 
|  | 1072 | LambdaSCCPass([&](LazyCallGraph::SCC &C, CGSCCAnalysisManager &AM, | 
|  | 1073 | LazyCallGraph &CG, CGSCCUpdateResult &) { | 
|  | 1074 | auto &DoublyIndirectResult = | 
|  | 1075 | AM.getResult<TestDoublyIndirectSCCAnalysis>(C, CG); | 
|  | 1076 | auto &IndirectResult = DoublyIndirectResult.IDep; | 
|  | 1077 | FunctionCount += IndirectResult.SCCDep.FunctionCount; | 
|  | 1078 | return PreservedAnalyses::all(); | 
|  | 1079 | })); | 
| Chandler Carruth | bd9c290 | 2017-07-09 03:59:31 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 1080 | CGPM2.addPass(createCGSCCToFunctionPassAdaptor( | 
|  | 1081 | RequireAnalysisPass<TestIndirectFunctionAnalysis, Function>())); | 
| Chandler Carruth | ba90ae9 | 2016-12-27 08:40:39 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 1082 |  | 
| Chandler Carruth | bd9c290 | 2017-07-09 03:59:31 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 1083 | // Add a requires pass to populate the module analysis and then our CGSCC | 
| Chandler Carruth | ba90ae9 | 2016-12-27 08:40:39 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 1084 | // pass pipeline. | 
|  | 1085 | MPM.addPass(RequireAnalysisPass<TestModuleAnalysis, Module>()); | 
|  | 1086 | MPM.addPass(createModuleToPostOrderCGSCCPassAdaptor(std::move(CGPM))); | 
|  | 1087 | // Now require the module analysis again (it will have been invalidated once) | 
| Chandler Carruth | bd9c290 | 2017-07-09 03:59:31 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 1088 | // and then use it again from our second CGSCC pipeline.. | 
| Chandler Carruth | ba90ae9 | 2016-12-27 08:40:39 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 1089 | MPM.addPass(RequireAnalysisPass<TestModuleAnalysis, Module>()); | 
|  | 1090 | MPM.addPass(createModuleToPostOrderCGSCCPassAdaptor(std::move(CGPM2))); | 
|  | 1091 | MPM.run(*M, MAM); | 
|  | 1092 |  | 
|  | 1093 | // There are generally two possible runs for each of the four SCCs. But | 
|  | 1094 | // for one SCC, we only invalidate the indirect analysis so the base one | 
|  | 1095 | // only gets run seven times. | 
|  | 1096 | EXPECT_EQ(7, SCCAnalysisRuns); | 
|  | 1097 | // The module analysis pass should be run twice here. | 
|  | 1098 | EXPECT_EQ(2, ModuleAnalysisRuns); | 
|  | 1099 | // The indirect analysis is invalidated (either directly or indirectly) three | 
|  | 1100 | // times for each of four SCCs. | 
|  | 1101 | EXPECT_EQ(3 * 4, IndirectSCCAnalysisRuns); | 
|  | 1102 | EXPECT_EQ(3 * 4, DoublyIndirectSCCAnalysisRuns); | 
|  | 1103 |  | 
| Chandler Carruth | bd9c290 | 2017-07-09 03:59:31 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 1104 | // We run the indirect function analysis once per function the first time. | 
|  | 1105 | // Then we re-run it for every SCC but "(g)". Then we re-run it for every | 
|  | 1106 | // function again. | 
|  | 1107 | EXPECT_EQ(6 + 5 + 6, IndirectFunctionAnalysisRuns); | 
|  | 1108 |  | 
| Chandler Carruth | ba90ae9 | 2016-12-27 08:40:39 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 1109 | // Four passes count each of six functions once (via SCCs). | 
|  | 1110 | EXPECT_EQ(4 * 6, FunctionCount); | 
|  | 1111 | } | 
| Chandler Carruth | 7c8964d | 2017-07-09 13:16:55 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 1112 |  | 
|  | 1113 | TEST_F(CGSCCPassManagerTest, TestAnalysisInvalidationCGSCCUpdate) { | 
|  | 1114 | int ModuleAnalysisRuns = 0; | 
|  | 1115 | MAM.registerPass([&] { return TestModuleAnalysis(ModuleAnalysisRuns); }); | 
|  | 1116 |  | 
|  | 1117 | int SCCAnalysisRuns = 0, IndirectSCCAnalysisRuns = 0, | 
|  | 1118 | DoublyIndirectSCCAnalysisRuns = 0; | 
|  | 1119 | CGAM.registerPass([&] { return TestSCCAnalysis(SCCAnalysisRuns); }); | 
|  | 1120 | CGAM.registerPass( | 
|  | 1121 | [&] { return TestIndirectSCCAnalysis(IndirectSCCAnalysisRuns); }); | 
|  | 1122 | CGAM.registerPass([&] { | 
|  | 1123 | return TestDoublyIndirectSCCAnalysis(DoublyIndirectSCCAnalysisRuns); | 
|  | 1124 | }); | 
|  | 1125 |  | 
|  | 1126 | int FunctionAnalysisRuns = 0, IndirectFunctionAnalysisRuns = 0; | 
|  | 1127 | FAM.registerPass([&] { return TestFunctionAnalysis(FunctionAnalysisRuns); }); | 
|  | 1128 | FAM.registerPass([&] { | 
|  | 1129 | return TestIndirectFunctionAnalysis(IndirectFunctionAnalysisRuns); | 
|  | 1130 | }); | 
|  | 1131 |  | 
|  | 1132 | ModulePassManager MPM(/*DebugLogging*/ true); | 
|  | 1133 |  | 
|  | 1134 | CGSCCPassManager CGPM(/*DebugLogging*/ true); | 
|  | 1135 | // First just use the analysis to get the function count and preserve | 
|  | 1136 | // everything. | 
|  | 1137 | using RequireTestIndirectFunctionAnalysisPass = | 
|  | 1138 | RequireAnalysisPass<TestIndirectFunctionAnalysis, Function>; | 
|  | 1139 | using RequireTestDoublyIndirectSCCAnalysisPass = | 
|  | 1140 | RequireAnalysisPass<TestDoublyIndirectSCCAnalysis, LazyCallGraph::SCC, | 
|  | 1141 | CGSCCAnalysisManager, LazyCallGraph &, | 
|  | 1142 | CGSCCUpdateResult &>; | 
|  | 1143 | CGPM.addPass(RequireTestDoublyIndirectSCCAnalysisPass()); | 
|  | 1144 | CGPM.addPass(createCGSCCToFunctionPassAdaptor( | 
|  | 1145 | RequireTestIndirectFunctionAnalysisPass())); | 
|  | 1146 |  | 
|  | 1147 | // Next, we inject an SCC pass that invalidates everything for the `(h3, h1, | 
|  | 1148 | // h2)` SCC but also deletes the call edge from `h2` to `h3` and updates the | 
|  | 1149 | // CG. This should successfully invalidate (and force to be re-run) all the | 
|  | 1150 | // analyses for that SCC and for the functions. | 
|  | 1151 | CGPM.addPass( | 
|  | 1152 | LambdaSCCPass([&](LazyCallGraph::SCC &C, CGSCCAnalysisManager &AM, | 
|  | 1153 | LazyCallGraph &CG, CGSCCUpdateResult &UR) { | 
|  | 1154 | (void)AM.getResult<TestDoublyIndirectSCCAnalysis>(C, CG); | 
|  | 1155 | if (C.getName() != "(h3, h1, h2)") | 
|  | 1156 | return PreservedAnalyses::all(); | 
|  | 1157 |  | 
|  | 1158 | // Build the preserved set. | 
|  | 1159 | auto PA = PreservedAnalyses::none(); | 
|  | 1160 | PA.preserve<FunctionAnalysisManagerCGSCCProxy>(); | 
|  | 1161 | PA.preserve<TestIndirectSCCAnalysis>(); | 
|  | 1162 | PA.preserve<TestDoublyIndirectSCCAnalysis>(); | 
|  | 1163 |  | 
|  | 1164 | // Delete the call from `h2` to `h3`. | 
|  | 1165 | auto &H2N = *llvm::find_if( | 
|  | 1166 | C, [](LazyCallGraph::Node &N) { return N.getName() == "h2"; }); | 
|  | 1167 | auto &H2F = H2N.getFunction(); | 
|  | 1168 | auto &H3F = *cast<CallInst>(H2F.begin()->begin())->getCalledFunction(); | 
|  | 1169 | assert(H3F.getName() == "h3" && "Wrong called function!"); | 
|  | 1170 | H2F.begin()->begin()->eraseFromParent(); | 
|  | 1171 | // Insert a bitcast of `h3` so that we retain a ref edge to it. | 
|  | 1172 | (void)CastInst::CreatePointerCast(&H3F, | 
|  | 1173 | Type::getInt8PtrTy(H2F.getContext()), | 
|  | 1174 | "dummy", &*H2F.begin()->begin()); | 
|  | 1175 |  | 
|  | 1176 | // Now update the call graph. | 
| Chandler Carruth | 19913b2 | 2017-08-11 05:47:13 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 1177 | auto &NewC = | 
|  | 1178 | updateCGAndAnalysisManagerForFunctionPass(CG, C, H2N, AM, UR); | 
| Chandler Carruth | 7c8964d | 2017-07-09 13:16:55 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 1179 | assert(&NewC != &C && "Should get a new SCC due to update!"); | 
| NAKAMURA Takumi | 3733fc4 | 2017-07-09 23:06:05 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 1180 | (void)&NewC; | 
| Chandler Carruth | 7c8964d | 2017-07-09 13:16:55 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 1181 |  | 
|  | 1182 | return PA; | 
|  | 1183 | })); | 
|  | 1184 | // Now use the analysis again on each SCC and function, forcing | 
|  | 1185 | // re-computation for all of them. | 
|  | 1186 | CGPM.addPass(RequireTestDoublyIndirectSCCAnalysisPass()); | 
|  | 1187 | CGPM.addPass(createCGSCCToFunctionPassAdaptor( | 
|  | 1188 | RequireTestIndirectFunctionAnalysisPass())); | 
|  | 1189 |  | 
|  | 1190 | // Create another CGSCC pipeline that requires all the analyses again. | 
|  | 1191 | CGSCCPassManager CGPM2(/*DebugLogging*/ true); | 
|  | 1192 | CGPM2.addPass(RequireTestDoublyIndirectSCCAnalysisPass()); | 
|  | 1193 | CGPM2.addPass(createCGSCCToFunctionPassAdaptor( | 
|  | 1194 | RequireTestIndirectFunctionAnalysisPass())); | 
|  | 1195 |  | 
|  | 1196 | // Next we inject an SCC pass that finds the `(h2)` SCC, adds a call to `h3` | 
|  | 1197 | // back to `h2`, and then invalidates everything for what will then be the | 
|  | 1198 | // `(h3, h1, h2)` SCC again. | 
|  | 1199 | CGSCCPassManager CGPM3(/*DebugLogging*/ true); | 
|  | 1200 | CGPM3.addPass( | 
|  | 1201 | LambdaSCCPass([&](LazyCallGraph::SCC &C, CGSCCAnalysisManager &AM, | 
|  | 1202 | LazyCallGraph &CG, CGSCCUpdateResult &UR) { | 
|  | 1203 | (void)AM.getResult<TestDoublyIndirectSCCAnalysis>(C, CG); | 
|  | 1204 | if (C.getName() != "(h2)") | 
|  | 1205 | return PreservedAnalyses::all(); | 
|  | 1206 |  | 
|  | 1207 | // Build the preserved set. | 
|  | 1208 | auto PA = PreservedAnalyses::none(); | 
|  | 1209 | PA.preserve<FunctionAnalysisManagerCGSCCProxy>(); | 
|  | 1210 | PA.preserve<TestIndirectSCCAnalysis>(); | 
|  | 1211 | PA.preserve<TestDoublyIndirectSCCAnalysis>(); | 
|  | 1212 |  | 
|  | 1213 | // Delete the bitcast of `h3` that we added earlier. | 
|  | 1214 | auto &H2N = *C.begin(); | 
|  | 1215 | auto &H2F = H2N.getFunction(); | 
|  | 1216 | auto &H3F = *cast<Function>(cast<BitCastInst>(H2F.begin()->begin())->getOperand(0)); | 
|  | 1217 | assert(H3F.getName() == "h3" && "Wrong called function!"); | 
|  | 1218 | H2F.begin()->begin()->eraseFromParent(); | 
|  | 1219 | // And insert a call to `h3`. | 
|  | 1220 | (void)CallInst::Create(&H3F, {}, "", &*H2F.begin()->begin()); | 
|  | 1221 |  | 
|  | 1222 | // Now update the call graph. | 
| Chandler Carruth | 19913b2 | 2017-08-11 05:47:13 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 1223 | auto &NewC = | 
|  | 1224 | updateCGAndAnalysisManagerForFunctionPass(CG, C, H2N, AM, UR); | 
| Chandler Carruth | 7c8964d | 2017-07-09 13:16:55 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 1225 | assert(&NewC != &C && "Should get a new SCC due to update!"); | 
| NAKAMURA Takumi | 3733fc4 | 2017-07-09 23:06:05 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 1226 | (void)&NewC; | 
| Chandler Carruth | 7c8964d | 2017-07-09 13:16:55 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 1227 |  | 
|  | 1228 | return PA; | 
|  | 1229 | })); | 
|  | 1230 | // Now use the analysis again on each SCC and function, forcing | 
|  | 1231 | // re-computation for all of them. | 
|  | 1232 | CGPM3.addPass(RequireTestDoublyIndirectSCCAnalysisPass()); | 
|  | 1233 | CGPM3.addPass(createCGSCCToFunctionPassAdaptor( | 
|  | 1234 | RequireTestIndirectFunctionAnalysisPass())); | 
|  | 1235 |  | 
|  | 1236 | // Create a second CGSCC pass manager. This will cause the module-level | 
|  | 1237 | // invalidation to occur, which will force yet another invalidation of the | 
|  | 1238 | // indirect SCC-level analysis as the module analysis it depends on gets | 
|  | 1239 | // invalidated. | 
|  | 1240 | CGSCCPassManager CGPM4(/*DebugLogging*/ true); | 
|  | 1241 | CGPM4.addPass(RequireTestDoublyIndirectSCCAnalysisPass()); | 
|  | 1242 | CGPM4.addPass(createCGSCCToFunctionPassAdaptor( | 
|  | 1243 | RequireTestIndirectFunctionAnalysisPass())); | 
|  | 1244 |  | 
|  | 1245 | // Add a requires pass to populate the module analysis and then one of our | 
|  | 1246 | // CGSCC pipelines. Repeat for all four CGSCC pipelines. | 
|  | 1247 | MPM.addPass(RequireAnalysisPass<TestModuleAnalysis, Module>()); | 
|  | 1248 | MPM.addPass(createModuleToPostOrderCGSCCPassAdaptor(std::move(CGPM))); | 
|  | 1249 | MPM.addPass(RequireAnalysisPass<TestModuleAnalysis, Module>()); | 
|  | 1250 | MPM.addPass(createModuleToPostOrderCGSCCPassAdaptor(std::move(CGPM2))); | 
|  | 1251 | MPM.addPass(RequireAnalysisPass<TestModuleAnalysis, Module>()); | 
|  | 1252 | MPM.addPass(createModuleToPostOrderCGSCCPassAdaptor(std::move(CGPM3))); | 
|  | 1253 | MPM.addPass(RequireAnalysisPass<TestModuleAnalysis, Module>()); | 
|  | 1254 | MPM.addPass(createModuleToPostOrderCGSCCPassAdaptor(std::move(CGPM4))); | 
|  | 1255 | MPM.run(*M, MAM); | 
|  | 1256 |  | 
|  | 1257 | // We run over four SCCs the first time. But then we split an SCC into three. | 
|  | 1258 | // And then we merge those three back into one. | 
|  | 1259 | EXPECT_EQ(4 + 3 + 1, SCCAnalysisRuns); | 
|  | 1260 | // The module analysis pass should be run three times. | 
|  | 1261 | EXPECT_EQ(3, ModuleAnalysisRuns); | 
|  | 1262 | // We run over four SCCs the first time. Then over the two new ones. Then the | 
|  | 1263 | // entire module is invalidated causing a full run over all seven. Then we | 
|  | 1264 | // fold three SCCs back to one, and then run over the whole module again. | 
|  | 1265 | EXPECT_EQ(4 + 2 + 7 + 1 + 4, IndirectSCCAnalysisRuns); | 
|  | 1266 | EXPECT_EQ(4 + 2 + 7 + 1 + 4, DoublyIndirectSCCAnalysisRuns); | 
|  | 1267 |  | 
|  | 1268 | // First we run over all six functions. Then we re-run it over three when we | 
|  | 1269 | // split their SCCs. Then we re-run over the whole module. Then we re-run | 
|  | 1270 | // over three functions merged back into a single SCC, and then over the | 
|  | 1271 | // whole module again. | 
| Chandler Carruth | 051bdb0 | 2017-07-12 09:08:11 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 1272 | EXPECT_EQ(6 + 3 + 6 + 3 + 6, FunctionAnalysisRuns); | 
| Chandler Carruth | 7c8964d | 2017-07-09 13:16:55 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 1273 |  | 
| Chandler Carruth | 051bdb0 | 2017-07-12 09:08:11 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 1274 | // Re run the function analysis over the entire module, and then re-run it | 
|  | 1275 | // over the `(h3, h1, h2)` SCC due to invalidation. Then we re-run it over | 
|  | 1276 | // the entire module, then the three functions merged back into a single SCC, | 
|  | 1277 | // and then over the whole module. | 
|  | 1278 | EXPECT_EQ(6 + 3 + 6 + 3 + 6, IndirectFunctionAnalysisRuns); | 
| Chandler Carruth | 7c8964d | 2017-07-09 13:16:55 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 1279 | } | 
| Chandler Carruth | 7431992 | 2016-02-23 10:02:02 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 1280 | } |