1. 93786da Make '-disable-llvm-optzns' an alias for '-disable-llvm-passes'. by Chandler Carruth · 9 years ago
  2. fc47355 [opaque pointer type] update test cases for explicit pointee types on global aliases by David Blaikie · 10 years ago
  3. 1e4df92 Add support for putting constructors and destructos in explicit comdats. by Rafael Espindola · 11 years ago
  4. 27c60b5 Update for llvm API change. by Rafael Espindola · 11 years ago
  5. b2633b9 Update for llvm api change. by Rafael Espindola · 11 years ago
  6. c3cde36 Output destructors and constructors in a more natural order. by Rafael Espindola · 12 years ago
  7. d967bad Don't use alias from derived dtor to base dtor at -O0. by Rafael Espindola · 12 years ago
  8. 4362261 CHECK-LABEL-ify some code gen tests to improve diagnostic experience when tests fail. by Stephen Lin · 12 years ago
  9. 8e4a386 PR12798: Don't drop part of the nested name specifier when instantiating a by Richard Smith · 13 years ago
  10. 05842da Move unnamed_addr after the function arguments on Sabre's request. by Rafael Espindola · 15 years ago
  11. 0ee986c1f Add unnamed_addr to constructors and destructors. by Rafael Espindola · 15 years ago
  12. f8ff7b9 Perform two more constructor/destructor code-size optimizations: by John McCall · 16 years ago
  13. d432414 Re-introduce the ctor/dtor alias optimization, this time hidden behind a by John McCall · 16 years ago
  14. 334ce7c Revert the ctor/dtor alias optimization for now; the buildbots can detect by John McCall · 16 years ago
  15. 5c60a6f Make deleting and complete dtor variants defer to other dtor variants by by John McCall · 16 years ago
  16. 67cea74 Emit complete constructors and destructors as aliases to base constructors by John McCall · 16 years ago
  17. e36a6b3 Correctly pass VTT parameters to constructors and destructors. The VTTs aren't yet used in the ctors/dtors, but that will follow. by Anders Carlsson · 16 years ago
  18. 8fbe78f Update tests to use %clang_cc1 instead of 'clang-cc' or 'clang -cc1'. by Daniel Dunbar · 16 years ago
  19. ce46052 When generating a virtual destructor, don't try to make a virtual call to the base class destructor because then we'll just re-enter the same destructor! by Anders Carlsson · 16 years ago