| = Transparent Hugepage Support = |
| |
| == Objective == |
| |
| Performance critical computing applications dealing with large memory |
| working sets are already running on top of libhugetlbfs and in turn |
| hugetlbfs. Transparent Hugepage Support is an alternative means of |
| using huge pages for the backing of virtual memory with huge pages |
| that supports the automatic promotion and demotion of page sizes and |
| without the shortcomings of hugetlbfs. |
| |
| Currently it only works for anonymous memory mappings but in the |
| future it can expand over the pagecache layer starting with tmpfs. |
| |
| The reason applications are running faster is because of two |
| factors. The first factor is almost completely irrelevant and it's not |
| of significant interest because it'll also have the downside of |
| requiring larger clear-page copy-page in page faults which is a |
| potentially negative effect. The first factor consists in taking a |
| single page fault for each 2M virtual region touched by userland (so |
| reducing the enter/exit kernel frequency by a 512 times factor). This |
| only matters the first time the memory is accessed for the lifetime of |
| a memory mapping. The second long lasting and much more important |
| factor will affect all subsequent accesses to the memory for the whole |
| runtime of the application. The second factor consist of two |
| components: 1) the TLB miss will run faster (especially with |
| virtualization using nested pagetables but almost always also on bare |
| metal without virtualization) and 2) a single TLB entry will be |
| mapping a much larger amount of virtual memory in turn reducing the |
| number of TLB misses. With virtualization and nested pagetables the |
| TLB can be mapped of larger size only if both KVM and the Linux guest |
| are using hugepages but a significant speedup already happens if only |
| one of the two is using hugepages just because of the fact the TLB |
| miss is going to run faster. |
| |
| == Design == |
| |
| - "graceful fallback": mm components which don't have transparent |
| hugepage knowledge fall back to breaking a transparent hugepage and |
| working on the regular pages and their respective regular pmd/pte |
| mappings |
| |
| - if a hugepage allocation fails because of memory fragmentation, |
| regular pages should be gracefully allocated instead and mixed in |
| the same vma without any failure or significant delay and without |
| userland noticing |
| |
| - if some task quits and more hugepages become available (either |
| immediately in the buddy or through the VM), guest physical memory |
| backed by regular pages should be relocated on hugepages |
| automatically (with khugepaged) |
| |
| - it doesn't require memory reservation and in turn it uses hugepages |
| whenever possible (the only possible reservation here is kernelcore= |
| to avoid unmovable pages to fragment all the memory but such a tweak |
| is not specific to transparent hugepage support and it's a generic |
| feature that applies to all dynamic high order allocations in the |
| kernel) |
| |
| - this initial support only offers the feature in the anonymous memory |
| regions but it'd be ideal to move it to tmpfs and the pagecache |
| later |
| |
| Transparent Hugepage Support maximizes the usefulness of free memory |
| if compared to the reservation approach of hugetlbfs by allowing all |
| unused memory to be used as cache or other movable (or even unmovable |
| entities). It doesn't require reservation to prevent hugepage |
| allocation failures to be noticeable from userland. It allows paging |
| and all other advanced VM features to be available on the |
| hugepages. It requires no modifications for applications to take |
| advantage of it. |
| |
| Applications however can be further optimized to take advantage of |
| this feature, like for example they've been optimized before to avoid |
| a flood of mmap system calls for every malloc(4k). Optimizing userland |
| is by far not mandatory and khugepaged already can take care of long |
| lived page allocations even for hugepage unaware applications that |
| deals with large amounts of memory. |
| |
| In certain cases when hugepages are enabled system wide, application |
| may end up allocating more memory resources. An application may mmap a |
| large region but only touch 1 byte of it, in that case a 2M page might |
| be allocated instead of a 4k page for no good. This is why it's |
| possible to disable hugepages system-wide and to only have them inside |
| MADV_HUGEPAGE madvise regions. |
| |
| Embedded systems should enable hugepages only inside madvise regions |
| to eliminate any risk of wasting any precious byte of memory and to |
| only run faster. |
| |
| Applications that gets a lot of benefit from hugepages and that don't |
| risk to lose memory by using hugepages, should use |
| madvise(MADV_HUGEPAGE) on their critical mmapped regions. |
| |
| == sysfs == |
| |
| Transparent Hugepage Support can be entirely disabled (mostly for |
| debugging purposes) or only enabled inside MADV_HUGEPAGE regions (to |
| avoid the risk of consuming more memory resources) or enabled system |
| wide. This can be achieved with one of: |
| |
| echo always >/sys/kernel/mm/transparent_hugepage/enabled |
| echo madvise >/sys/kernel/mm/transparent_hugepage/enabled |
| echo never >/sys/kernel/mm/transparent_hugepage/enabled |
| |
| It's also possible to limit defrag efforts in the VM to generate |
| hugepages in case they're not immediately free to madvise regions or |
| to never try to defrag memory and simply fallback to regular pages |
| unless hugepages are immediately available. Clearly if we spend CPU |
| time to defrag memory, we would expect to gain even more by the fact |
| we use hugepages later instead of regular pages. This isn't always |
| guaranteed, but it may be more likely in case the allocation is for a |
| MADV_HUGEPAGE region. |
| |
| echo always >/sys/kernel/mm/transparent_hugepage/defrag |
| echo madvise >/sys/kernel/mm/transparent_hugepage/defrag |
| echo never >/sys/kernel/mm/transparent_hugepage/defrag |
| |
| khugepaged will be automatically started when |
| transparent_hugepage/enabled is set to "always" or "madvise, and it'll |
| be automatically shutdown if it's set to "never". |
| |
| khugepaged runs usually at low frequency so while one may not want to |
| invoke defrag algorithms synchronously during the page faults, it |
| should be worth invoking defrag at least in khugepaged. However it's |
| also possible to disable defrag in khugepaged: |
| |
| echo yes >/sys/kernel/mm/transparent_hugepage/khugepaged/defrag |
| echo no >/sys/kernel/mm/transparent_hugepage/khugepaged/defrag |
| |
| You can also control how many pages khugepaged should scan at each |
| pass: |
| |
| /sys/kernel/mm/transparent_hugepage/khugepaged/pages_to_scan |
| |
| and how many milliseconds to wait in khugepaged between each pass (you |
| can set this to 0 to run khugepaged at 100% utilization of one core): |
| |
| /sys/kernel/mm/transparent_hugepage/khugepaged/scan_sleep_millisecs |
| |
| and how many milliseconds to wait in khugepaged if there's an hugepage |
| allocation failure to throttle the next allocation attempt. |
| |
| /sys/kernel/mm/transparent_hugepage/khugepaged/alloc_sleep_millisecs |
| |
| The khugepaged progress can be seen in the number of pages collapsed: |
| |
| /sys/kernel/mm/transparent_hugepage/khugepaged/pages_collapsed |
| |
| for each pass: |
| |
| /sys/kernel/mm/transparent_hugepage/khugepaged/full_scans |
| |
| == Boot parameter == |
| |
| You can change the sysfs boot time defaults of Transparent Hugepage |
| Support by passing the parameter "transparent_hugepage=always" or |
| "transparent_hugepage=madvise" or "transparent_hugepage=never" |
| (without "") to the kernel command line. |
| |
| == Need of application restart == |
| |
| The transparent_hugepage/enabled values only affect future |
| behavior. So to make them effective you need to restart any |
| application that could have been using hugepages. This also applies to |
| the regions registered in khugepaged. |
| |
| == get_user_pages and follow_page == |
| |
| get_user_pages and follow_page if run on a hugepage, will return the |
| head or tail pages as usual (exactly as they would do on |
| hugetlbfs). Most gup users will only care about the actual physical |
| address of the page and its temporary pinning to release after the I/O |
| is complete, so they won't ever notice the fact the page is huge. But |
| if any driver is going to mangle over the page structure of the tail |
| page (like for checking page->mapping or other bits that are relevant |
| for the head page and not the tail page), it should be updated to jump |
| to check head page instead (while serializing properly against |
| split_huge_page() to avoid the head and tail pages to disappear from |
| under it, see the futex code to see an example of that, hugetlbfs also |
| needed special handling in futex code for similar reasons). |
| |
| NOTE: these aren't new constraints to the GUP API, and they match the |
| same constrains that applies to hugetlbfs too, so any driver capable |
| of handling GUP on hugetlbfs will also work fine on transparent |
| hugepage backed mappings. |
| |
| In case you can't handle compound pages if they're returned by |
| follow_page, the FOLL_SPLIT bit can be specified as parameter to |
| follow_page, so that it will split the hugepages before returning |
| them. Migration for example passes FOLL_SPLIT as parameter to |
| follow_page because it's not hugepage aware and in fact it can't work |
| at all on hugetlbfs (but it instead works fine on transparent |
| hugepages thanks to FOLL_SPLIT). migration simply can't deal with |
| hugepages being returned (as it's not only checking the pfn of the |
| page and pinning it during the copy but it pretends to migrate the |
| memory in regular page sizes and with regular pte/pmd mappings). |
| |
| == Optimizing the applications == |
| |
| To be guaranteed that the kernel will map a 2M page immediately in any |
| memory region, the mmap region has to be hugepage naturally |
| aligned. posix_memalign() can provide that guarantee. |
| |
| == Hugetlbfs == |
| |
| You can use hugetlbfs on a kernel that has transparent hugepage |
| support enabled just fine as always. No difference can be noted in |
| hugetlbfs other than there will be less overall fragmentation. All |
| usual features belonging to hugetlbfs are preserved and |
| unaffected. libhugetlbfs will also work fine as usual. |
| |
| == Graceful fallback == |
| |
| Code walking pagetables but unware about huge pmds can simply call |
| split_huge_page_pmd(mm, pmd) where the pmd is the one returned by |
| pmd_offset. It's trivial to make the code transparent hugepage aware |
| by just grepping for "pmd_offset" and adding split_huge_page_pmd where |
| missing after pmd_offset returns the pmd. Thanks to the graceful |
| fallback design, with a one liner change, you can avoid to write |
| hundred if not thousand of lines of complex code to make your code |
| hugepage aware. |
| |
| If you're not walking pagetables but you run into a physical hugepage |
| but you can't handle it natively in your code, you can split it by |
| calling split_huge_page(page). This is what the Linux VM does before |
| it tries to swapout the hugepage for example. |
| |
| Example to make mremap.c transparent hugepage aware with a one liner |
| change: |
| |
| diff --git a/mm/mremap.c b/mm/mremap.c |
| --- a/mm/mremap.c |
| +++ b/mm/mremap.c |
| @@ -41,6 +41,7 @@ static pmd_t *get_old_pmd(struct mm_stru |
| return NULL; |
| |
| pmd = pmd_offset(pud, addr); |
| + split_huge_page_pmd(mm, pmd); |
| if (pmd_none_or_clear_bad(pmd)) |
| return NULL; |
| |
| == Locking in hugepage aware code == |
| |
| We want as much code as possible hugepage aware, as calling |
| split_huge_page() or split_huge_page_pmd() has a cost. |
| |
| To make pagetable walks huge pmd aware, all you need to do is to call |
| pmd_trans_huge() on the pmd returned by pmd_offset. You must hold the |
| mmap_sem in read (or write) mode to be sure an huge pmd cannot be |
| created from under you by khugepaged (khugepaged collapse_huge_page |
| takes the mmap_sem in write mode in addition to the anon_vma lock). If |
| pmd_trans_huge returns false, you just fallback in the old code |
| paths. If instead pmd_trans_huge returns true, you have to take the |
| mm->page_table_lock and re-run pmd_trans_huge. Taking the |
| page_table_lock will prevent the huge pmd to be converted into a |
| regular pmd from under you (split_huge_page can run in parallel to the |
| pagetable walk). If the second pmd_trans_huge returns false, you |
| should just drop the page_table_lock and fallback to the old code as |
| before. Otherwise you should run pmd_trans_splitting on the pmd. In |
| case pmd_trans_splitting returns true, it means split_huge_page is |
| already in the middle of splitting the page. So if pmd_trans_splitting |
| returns true it's enough to drop the page_table_lock and call |
| wait_split_huge_page and then fallback the old code paths. You are |
| guaranteed by the time wait_split_huge_page returns, the pmd isn't |
| huge anymore. If pmd_trans_splitting returns false, you can proceed to |
| process the huge pmd and the hugepage natively. Once finished you can |
| drop the page_table_lock. |
| |
| == compound_lock, get_user_pages and put_page == |
| |
| split_huge_page internally has to distribute the refcounts in the head |
| page to the tail pages before clearing all PG_head/tail bits from the |
| page structures. It can do that easily for refcounts taken by huge pmd |
| mappings. But the GUI API as created by hugetlbfs (that returns head |
| and tail pages if running get_user_pages on an address backed by any |
| hugepage), requires the refcount to be accounted on the tail pages and |
| not only in the head pages, if we want to be able to run |
| split_huge_page while there are gup pins established on any tail |
| page. Failure to be able to run split_huge_page if there's any gup pin |
| on any tail page, would mean having to split all hugepages upfront in |
| get_user_pages which is unacceptable as too many gup users are |
| performance critical and they must work natively on hugepages like |
| they work natively on hugetlbfs already (hugetlbfs is simpler because |
| hugetlbfs pages cannot be splitted so there wouldn't be requirement of |
| accounting the pins on the tail pages for hugetlbfs). If we wouldn't |
| account the gup refcounts on the tail pages during gup, we won't know |
| anymore which tail page is pinned by gup and which is not while we run |
| split_huge_page. But we still have to add the gup pin to the head page |
| too, to know when we can free the compound page in case it's never |
| splitted during its lifetime. That requires changing not just |
| get_page, but put_page as well so that when put_page runs on a tail |
| page (and only on a tail page) it will find its respective head page, |
| and then it will decrease the head page refcount in addition to the |
| tail page refcount. To obtain a head page reliably and to decrease its |
| refcount without race conditions, put_page has to serialize against |
| __split_huge_page_refcount using a special per-page lock called |
| compound_lock. |