| Contributing To Busybox |
| ======================= |
| |
| This document describes what you need to do to contribute to Busybox, where |
| you can help, guidelines on testing, and how to submit a well-formed patch |
| that is more likely to be accepted. |
| |
| The Busybox home page is at: http://busybox.lineo.com |
| |
| |
| |
| Pre-Contribution Checklist |
| -------------------------- |
| |
| So you want to contribute to Busybox, eh? Great, wonderful, glad you want to |
| help. However, before you dive in, headlong and hotfoot, there are some things |
| you need to do: |
| |
| |
| Checkout the Latest Code from CVS |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| |
| This is a necessary first step. Please do not try to work with the last |
| released version, as there is a good chance that somebody has already fixed |
| the bug you found. Somebody might have even added the feature you had in mind. |
| Don't make your work obsolete before you start! |
| |
| For information on how to check out Busybox from CVS, please look at the |
| following links: |
| |
| http://oss.lineo.com/cvs_anon.html |
| http://oss.lineo.com/cvs_howto.html |
| |
| |
| Read the Mailing List |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| |
| No one is required to read the entire archives of the mailing list, but you |
| should at least read up on what people have been talking about lately. If |
| you've recently discovered a problem, chances are somebody else has too. If |
| you're the first to discover a problem, post a message and let the rest of us |
| know. |
| |
| Archives can be found here: |
| |
| http://opensource.lineo.com/lists/busybox/ |
| |
| If you have a serious interest in Busybox, i.e., you are using it day-to-day or |
| as part of an embedded project, it would be a good idea to join the mailing |
| list. |
| |
| A web-based sign-up form can be found here: |
| |
| http://opensource.lineo.com/mailman/listinfo/busybox |
| |
| |
| Coordinate with the Applet Maintainer |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| |
| Some (not all) of the applets in Busybox are "owned" by a maintainer who has |
| put significant effort into it and is probably more familiar with it than |
| others. To find the maintainer of an applet, look at the top of the .c file |
| for a name following the word 'Copyright' or 'Written by' or 'Maintainer'. |
| |
| Before plunging ahead, it's a good idea to send a message to the mailing list |
| that says: "Hey, I was thinking about adding the 'transmogrify' feature to the |
| 'foo' applet. Would this be useful? Is anyone else working on it?" You might |
| want to CC the maintainer (if any) with your question. |
| |
| |
| |
| Areas Where You Can Help |
| ------------------------ |
| |
| Busybox can always use improvement! If you're looking for ways to help, there |
| there are a variety of areas where you could help. |
| |
| |
| What Busybox Doesn't Need |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| |
| Before listing the areas where you _can_ help, it's worthwhile to mention the |
| areas where you shouldn't bother. While Busybox strives to be the "Swiss Army |
| Knife" of embedded Linux, there are some applets that will not be accepted: |
| |
| - Any filesystem manipulation tools: Busybox is filesystem independent and |
| we do not want to start adding mkfs/fsck tools for every (or any) |
| filesystem under the sun. (fsck_minix.c and mkfs_minix.c are living on |
| borrowed time.) There are far too many of these tools out there. Use |
| the upstream version. Not everything has to be part of Busybox. |
| |
| - Any partitioning tools: Partitioning a device is typically done once and |
| only once, and tools which do this generally do not need to reside on the |
| target device (esp a flash device). If you need a partitioning tool, grab |
| one (such as fdisk, sfdisk, or cfdisk from util-linux) and use that, but |
| don't try to merge it into busybox. These are nasty and complex and we |
| don't want to maintain them. |
| |
| - Any disk, device, or media-specific tools: Use the -utils or -tools package |
| that was designed for your device; don't try to shoehorn them into Busybox. |
| |
| - Any architecture specific tools: Busybox is (or should be) architecture |
| independent. Do not send us tools that cannot be used across multiple |
| platforms / arches. |
| |
| - Any daemons that are not essential to basic system operation. To date, only |
| syslogd and klogd meet this requirement. We do not need a web server, an |
| ftp daemon, a dhcp server, a mail transport agent or a dns resolver. If you |
| need one of those, you are welcome to ask the folks on the mailing list for |
| recommendations, but please don't bloat up Busybox with any of these. |
| |
| |
| Bug Reporting |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| |
| If you find a bug in Busybox, you can send a bug report to our bug tracking |
| system (homepage: http://bugs.lineo.com). Instructions on how to send a bug |
| report to the tracking system can be found at: |
| |
| http://bugs.lineo.com/Reporting.html |
| |
| The README file that comes with Busybox also describes how to submit a bug. |
| |
| A well-written bug report should include a transcript of a shell session that |
| demonstrates the bad behavior and enables anyone else to duplicate the bug on |
| their own machine. The following is such an example: |
| |
| When I execute Busybox 'date' it produces unexpected results. |
| |
| This is using GNU date: |
| $ date |
| Wed Mar 21 14:19:41 MST 2001 |
| |
| This is using Busybox date: |
| $ date |
| codswaddle |
| |
| |
| Bug Triage |
| ~~~~~~~~~~ |
| |
| Validating and confirming bugs is nearly as important as reporting them in the |
| first place. It is valuable to know if a bug can be duplicated on a different |
| machine, on a different filesystem, on a different architecture, with a |
| different C library, and so forth. |
| |
| To see a listing of all the bugs currently filed against Busybox, look here: |
| |
| http://bugs.lineo.com/db/pa/lbusybox.html |
| |
| If you have comments to add to a bug (can / can't duplicate, think a bug |
| should be closed / reopened), please send it to [bugnumber]@bugs.lineo.com. |
| The message you send will automatically be forwarded to the mailing list for |
| all to see. |
| |
| |
| Write Documentation |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| |
| Chances are, documentation in Busybox is either missing or needs improvement. |
| Either way, help is welcome. |
| |
| Work is being done to automatically generate documentation from sources, |
| especially from the usage.h file. If you want to correct the documentation, |
| please make changes to the pre-generation parts, rather than the generated |
| documentation. [More to come on this later...] |
| |
| It is preferred that modifications to documentation be submitted in patch |
| format (more on this below), but we're a little more lenient when it comes to |
| docs. You could, for example, just say "after the listing of the mount |
| options, the following example would be helpful..." |
| |
| |
| Consult Existing Sources |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| |
| For a quick listing of "needs work" spots in the sources, cd into the Busybox |
| directory and run the following: |
| |
| for i in TODO FIXME XXX; do grep $i *.[ch]; done |
| |
| This will show all of the trouble spots or 'questionable' code. Pick a spot, |
| any spot, these are all invitations for you to contribute. |
| |
| |
| Consult The Bug-Tracking System |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| |
| Head to: http://bugs.lineo.com/db/pa/lBusybox.html and look at the bugs on |
| there. Pick one you think you can fix, and fix it. If it's a wishlist item and |
| someone's requesting a new feature, take a stab at adding it. Everything |
| previously said about "reading the mailing list" and "coordinating with the |
| applet maintainer" still applies. |
| |
| |
| Add a New Applet |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| |
| If you want to add a new applet to Busybox, we'd love to see it. However, |
| before you write any code, please ask beforehand on the mailing list something |
| like "Do you think applet 'foo' would be useful in Busybox?" or "Would you |
| guys accept applet 'foo' into Busybox if I were to write it?" If the answer is |
| "no" by the folks on the mailing list, then you've saved yourself some time. |
| Conversely, you could get some positive responses from folks who might be |
| interested in helping you implement it, or can recommend the best approach. |
| Perhaps most importantly, this is your way of calling "dibs" on something and |
| avoiding duplication of effort. |
| |
| Also, before you write a line of code, please read the 'new-applet-HOWTO.txt' |
| file in the docs/ directory. |
| |
| |
| Janitorial Work |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| |
| These are dirty jobs, but somebody's gotta do 'em. |
| |
| - Converting applets to use getopt() for option processing. Type 'grep -L |
| getopt *.c' to get a listing of the applets that currently don't use |
| getopt. If a .c file processes no options, it should have a line that |
| reads: /* no options, no getopt */ somewhere in the file. |
| |
| - Replace any "naked" calls to malloc, calloc, realloc, str[n]dup, fopen with |
| the x* equivalents found in utility.c. |
| |
| - Security audits: |
| http://www.securityfocus.com/frames/?content=/forums/secprog/secure-programming.html |
| |
| - Synthetic code removal: http://www.perl.com/pub/2000/06/commify.html - This |
| is very Perl-specific, but the advice given in here applies equally well to |
| C. |
| |
| - C library funciton use audits: Verifying that functions are being used |
| properly (called with the right args), replacing unsafe library functions |
| with safer versions, making sure return codes are being checked, etc. |
| |
| - Where appropriate, replace preprocessor defined macros and values with |
| compile-time equivalents. |
| |
| - Style guide compliance. See: docs/style-guide.txt |
| |
| - Add testcases to tests/testcases. |
| |
| - Makefile improvements: |
| http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~millerp/rmch/recu-make-cons-harm.html |
| (I think the recursive problems are pretty much taken care of at this point, non?) |
| |
| - "Ten Commandments" compliance: (this is a "maybe", certainly not as |
| important as any of the previous items.) |
| http://web.onetelnet.ch/~twolf/tw/c/ten_commandments.html |
| |
| Other useful links: |
| |
| - the comp.lang.c FAQ: http://web.onetelnet.ch/~twolf/tw/c/index.html#Sources |
| |
| |
| |
| Submitting Patches To Busybox |
| ----------------------------- |
| |
| Here are some guidelines on how to submit a patch to Busybox. |
| |
| |
| Making A Patch |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| |
| If you've got anonymous CVS access set up, making a patch is simple. Just make |
| sure you're in the busybox/ directory and type 'cvs diff -bwu > mychanges.patch'. |
| You can send the resulting .patch file to the mailing list with a description |
| of what it does. (But not before you test it! See the next section for some |
| guidelines.) It is preferred that patches be sent as attachments, but it is |
| not required. |
| |
| Also, feel free to help test other people's patches and reply to them with |
| comments. You can apply a patch by saving it into your busybox/ directory and |
| typing 'patch < mychanges.patch'. Then you can recompile, see if it runs, test |
| if it works as advertised, and post your findings to the mailing list. |
| |
| NOTE: Please do not include extraneous or irrelevant changes in your patches. |
| Please do not try to "bundle" two patches together into one. Make single, |
| discreet changes on a per-patch basis. Sometimes you need to make a patch that |
| touches code in many places, but these kind of patches are rare and should be |
| coordinated with a maintainer. |
| |
| |
| Testing Guidelines |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| |
| It's considered good form to test your new feature before you submit a patch |
| to the mailing list, and especially before you commit a change to CVS. Here |
| are some guidelines on how to test your changes. |
| |
| - Always test Busybox applets against GNU counterparts and make sure the |
| behavior / output is identical between the two. |
| |
| - Try several different permutations and combinations of the features you're |
| adding (i.e., different combinations of command-line switches) and make sure |
| they all work; make sure one feature does not interfere with another. |
| |
| - Make sure you test compiling against the source both with the feature |
| turned on and turned off in Config.h and make sure Busybox compiles cleanly |
| both ways. |
| |
| - Run the multibuild.pl script in the tests directory and make sure |
| everything checks out OK. (Do this from within the busybox/ directory by |
| typing: 'tests/multibuild.pl'.) |
| |
| |
| Making Sure Your Patch Doesn't Get Lost |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| |
| If you don't want your patch to be lost or forgotten, send it to the bug |
| tracking system (http://bugs.lineo.com). You do this by emailing your patch in |
| a message to submit@bugs.lineo.com with a subject line something like this: |
| |
| [PATCH] - Adds "transmogrify" feature to "foo" |
| |
| In the body, you should have a pseudo-header that looks like the following: |
| |
| Package: busybox |
| Version: v0.50pre (or whatever the current version is) |
| Severity: wishlist |
| |
| The remainder of the body should read along these lines: |
| |
| This patch adds the "transmogrify" feature to the "foo" applet. I have |
| tested this on [arch] system(s) and it works. I have tested it against the |
| GNU counterparts and the outputs are identical. I have run the scripts in |
| the 'tests' directory and nothing breaks. |
| |
| Detailed instructions on how to submit a bug to the tracking system are at: |
| |
| http://bugs.lineo.com/Reporting.html |
| |
| If you have a patch that will fix and close a reported bug, please send a |
| message to [bugnumber]@bugs.lineo.com with your patch attached. It will catch |
| people's attention if you have a subject line like the following: |
| |
| [PATCH INCLUDED] - Fix attached, please apply and close this bug |
| |
| |
| |
| Improving Your Chances of Patch Acceptance |
| ------------------------------------------ |
| |
| Even after you send a brilliant patch to the mailing list, sometimes it can go |
| unnoticed, un-replied-to, and sometimes (sigh) even lost. This is an |
| unfortunate fact of life, but there are steps you can take to help your patch |
| get noticed and convince a maintainer that it should be added: |
| |
| |
| Be Succinct |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| |
| A patch that includes small, isolated, obvious changes is more likely to be |
| accepted than a patch that touches code in lots of different places or makes |
| sweeping, dubious changes. |
| |
| |
| Back It Up |
| ~~~~~~~~~~ |
| |
| Hard facts on why your patch is better than the existing code will go a long |
| way toward convincing maintainers that your patch should be included. |
| Specifically, patches are more likely to be accepted if they are provably more |
| correct, smaller, faster, simpler, or more maintainable than the existing |
| code. |
| |
| Conversely, any patch that is supported with nothing more than "I think this |
| would be cool" or "this patch is good because I say it is and I've got a Phd |
| in Computer Science" will likely be ignored. |
| |
| |
| Follow The Style Guide |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| |
| It's considered good form to abide by the established coding style used in a |
| project; Busybox is no exception. We have gone so far as to delineate the |
| "elements of Busybox style" in the file docs/style-guide.txt. Please follow |
| them. |
| |
| |
| Work With Someone Else |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| |
| Working on a patch in isolation is less effective than working with someone |
| else for a variety of reasons. If another Busybox user is interested in what |
| you're doing, then it's two (or more) voices instead of one that can petition |
| for inclusion of the patch. You'll also have more people that can test your |
| changes, or even offer suggestions on better approaches you could take. |
| |
| Getting other folks interested follows as a natural course if you've received |
| responses from queries to applet maintainer or positive responses from folks |
| on the mailing list. |
| |
| We've made strident efforts to put a useful "collaboration" infrastructure in |
| place in the form of mailing lists, the bug tracking system, and CVS. Please |
| use these resources. |
| |
| |
| Send Patches to the Bug Tracking System |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| |
| This was mentioned above in the "Making Sure Your Patch Doesn't Get Lost" |
| section, but it is worth mentioning again. A patch sent to the mailing list |
| might be unnoticed and forgotten. A patch sent to the bug tracking system will |
| be stored and closely connected to the bug it fixes. |
| |
| |
| Be Polite |
| ~~~~~~~~~ |
| |
| The old saying "You'll catch more flies with honey than you will with vinegar" |
| applies when submitting patches to the mailing list for approval. The way you |
| present your patch is sometimes just as important as the actual patch itself |
| (if not more so). Being rude to the maintainers is not an effective way to |
| convince them that your patch should be included; it will likely have the |
| opposite effect. |
| |
| |
| |
| Committing Changes to CVS |
| ------------------------- |
| |
| If you submit several patches that demonstrate that you are a skilled and wise |
| coder, you may be invited to become a committer, thus enabling you to commit |
| changes directly to CVS. This is nice because you don't have to wait for |
| someone else to commit your change for you, you can just do it yourself. |
| |
| But note that this is a priviledge that comes with some responsibilities. You |
| should test your changes before you commit them. You should also talk to an |
| applet maintainer before you make any kind of sweeping changes to somebody |
| else's code. Big changes should still go to the mailing list first. Remember, |
| being wise, polite, and discreet is more important than being clever. |
| |
| |
| When To Commit |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| |
| Generally, you should feel free to commit a change if: |
| |
| - Your changes are small and don't touch many files |
| - You are fixing a bug |
| - Somebody has told you that it's okay |
| - It's obviously the Right Thing |
| |
| The more of the above are true, the better it is to just commit a change |
| directly to CVS. |
| |
| |
| When Not To Commit |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| |
| Even if you have commit rights, you should probably still post a patch to the |
| mailing list if: |
| |
| - Your changes are broad and touch many different files |
| - You are adding a feature |
| - Your changes are speculative or experimental (i.e., trying a new algorithm) |
| - You are not the maintainer and your changes make the maintainer cringe |
| |
| The more of the above are true, the better it is to post a patch to the |
| mailing list instead of committing. |
| |
| |
| |
| Final Words |
| ----------- |
| |
| If all of this seems complicated, don't panic, it's really not that tough. If |
| you're having difficulty following some of the steps outlined in this |
| document don't worry, the folks on the Busybox mailing list are a fairly |
| good-natured bunch and will work with you to help get your patches into shape |
| or help you make contributions. |
| |
| |