www/diagnostics.html - fp2-dev/platform/external/clang - Gitiles

 <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN"
           "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">
 <html>
 <head>
   <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
   <title>Clang - Expressive Diagnostics</title>
   <link type="text/css" rel="stylesheet" href="menu.css" />
   <link type="text/css" rel="stylesheet" href="content.css" />
   <style type="text/css">
 </style>
 </head>
 <body>

 <!--#include virtual="menu.html.incl"-->

 <div id="content">


 <!--=======================================================================-->
 <h1>Expressive Diagnostics</h1>
 <!--=======================================================================-->

 <p>In addition to being fast and functional, we aim to make Clang extremely user
 friendly.  As far as a command-line compiler goes, this basically boils down to
 making the diagnostics (error and warning messages) generated by the compiler
 be as useful as possible.  There are several ways that we do this.  This section
 talks about the experience provided by the command line compiler, contrasting
 Clang output to GCC 4.2's output in several examples.
 <!--
 Other clients
 that embed Clang and extract equivalent information through internal APIs.-->
 </p>

 <h2>Column Numbers and Caret Diagnostics</h2>

 <p>First, all diagnostics produced by clang include full column number
 information. The clang command-line compiler driver uses this information
 to print "caret diagnostics".
 (IDEs can use the information to display in-line error markup.)
 Precise error location in the source is a feature provided by many commercial
 compilers, but is generally missing from open source
 compilers.  This is nice because it makes it very easy to understand exactly
 what is wrong in a particular piece of code</p>

 <p>The caret (the blue "^" character) exactly shows where the problem is, even
 inside of a string.  This makes it really easy to jump to the problem and
 helps when multiple instances of the same character occur on a line. (We'll
 revisit this more in following examples.)</p>

 <pre>
   $ <b>gcc-4.2 -fsyntax-only -Wformat format-strings.c</b>
   format-strings.c:91: warning: too few arguments for format
   $ <b>clang -fsyntax-only format-strings.c</b>
   format-strings.c:91:13: <font color="magenta">warning:</font> '.*' specified field precision is missing a matching 'int' argument
   <font color="darkgreen">  printf("%.*d");</font>
   <font color="blue">            ^</font>
 </pre>

 <h2>Range Highlighting for Related Text</h2>

 <p>Clang captures and accurately tracks range information for expressions,
 statements, and other constructs in your program and uses this to make
 diagnostics highlight related information.  In the following somewhat
 nonsensical example you can see that you don't even need to see the original source code to
 understand what is wrong based on the Clang error. Because clang prints a
 caret, you know exactly <em>which</em> plus it is complaining about.  The range
 information highlights the left and right side of the plus which makes it
 immediately obvious what the compiler is talking about.
 Range information is very useful for
 cases involving precedence issues and many other cases.</p>

 <pre>
   $ <b>gcc-4.2 -fsyntax-only t.c</b>
   t.c:7: error: invalid operands to binary + (have 'int' and 'struct A')
   $ <b>clang -fsyntax-only t.c</b>
   t.c:7:39: <font color="red">error:</font> invalid operands to binary expression ('int' and 'struct A')
   <font color="darkgreen">  return y + func(y ? ((SomeA.X + 40) + SomeA) / 42 + SomeA.X : SomeA.X);</font>
   <font color="blue">                       ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~~~</font>
 </pre>

 <h2>Precision in Wording</h2>

 <p>A detail is that we have tried really hard to make the diagnostics that come
 out of clang contain exactly the pertinent information about what is wrong and
 why.  In the example above, we tell you what the inferred types are for
 the left and right hand sides, and we don't repeat what is obvious from the
 caret (e.g., that this is a "binary +").</p>

 <p>Many other examples abound. In the following example, not only do we tell you that there is a problem with the *
 and point to it, we say exactly why and tell you what the type is (in case it is
 a complicated subexpression, such as a call to an overloaded function).  This
 sort of attention to detail makes it much easier to understand and fix problems
 quickly.</p>

 <pre>
   $ <b>gcc-4.2 -fsyntax-only t.c</b>
   t.c:5: error: invalid type argument of 'unary *'
   $ <b>clang -fsyntax-only t.c</b>
   t.c:5:11: <font color="red">error:</font> indirection requires pointer operand ('int' invalid)
   <font color="darkgreen">  int y = *SomeA.X;</font>
   <font color="blue">          ^~~~~~~~</font>
 </pre>

 <h2>No Pretty Printing of Expressions in Diagnostics</h2>

 <p>Since Clang has range highlighting, it never needs to pretty print your code
 back out to you.  GCC can produce inscrutible error messages in some cases when
 it tries to do this.  In this example P and Q have type "int*":</p>

 <pre>
   $ <b>gcc-4.2 -fsyntax-only t.c</b>
   #'exact_div_expr' not supported by pp_c_expression#'t.c:12: error: called object  is not a function
   $ <b>clang -fsyntax-only t.c</b>
   t.c:12:8: <font color="red">error:</font> called object type 'int' is not a function or function pointer
   <font color="darkgreen">  (P-Q)();</font>
   <font color="blue">  ~~~~~^</font>
 </pre>

 <p>This can be particularly bad in G++, which often emits errors
    containing lowered vtable references.  For example:</p>

 <pre>
   $ <b>cat t.cc</b>
   struct a {
     virtual int bar();
   };

   struct foo : public virtual a {
   };

   void test(foo *P) {
     return P->bar() + *P;
   }
   $ <b>gcc-4.2 t.cc</b>
   t.cc: In function 'void test(foo*)':
   t.cc:9: error: no match for 'operator+' in '(((a*)P) + (*(long int*)(P-&gt;foo::&lt;anonymous&gt;.a::_vptr$a + -0x00000000000000020)))-&gt;a::bar() + * P'
   t.cc:9: error: return-statement with a value, in function returning 'void'
   $ <b>clang t.cc</b>
   t.cc:9:18: <font color="red">error:</font> invalid operands to binary expression ('int' and 'foo')
   <font color="darkgreen">  return P->bar() + *P;</font>
   <font color="blue">         ~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~</font>
 </pre>


 <h2>Typedef Preservation and Selective Unwrapping</h2>

 <p>Many programmers use high-level user defined types, typedefs, and other
 syntactic sugar to refer to types in their program.  This is useful because they
 can abbreviate otherwise very long types and it is useful to preserve the
 typename in diagnostics.  However, sometimes very simple typedefs can wrap
 trivial types and it is important to strip off the typedef to understand what
 is going on.  Clang aims to handle both cases well.<p>

 <p>The following example shows where it is important to preserve
 a typedef in C. Here the type printed by GCC isn't even valid, but if the error
 were about a very long and complicated type (as often happens in C++) the error
 message would be ugly just because it was long and hard to read.</p>

 <pre>
   $ <b>gcc-4.2 -fsyntax-only t.c</b>
   t.c:15: error: invalid operands to binary / (have 'float __vector__' and 'const int *')
   $ <b>clang -fsyntax-only t.c</b>
   t.c:15:11: <font color="red">error:</font> can't convert between vector values of different size ('__m128' and 'int const *')
   <font color="darkgreen">  myvec[1]/P;</font>
   <font color="blue">  ~~~~~~~~^~</font>
 </pre>

 <p>The following example shows where it is useful for the compiler to expose
 underlying details of a typedef. If the user was somehow confused about how the
 system "pid_t" typedef is defined, Clang helpfully displays it with "aka".</p>

 <pre>
   $ <b>gcc-4.2 -fsyntax-only t.c</b>
   t.c:13: error: request for member 'x' in something not a structure or union
   $ <b>clang -fsyntax-only t.c</b>
   t.c:13:9: <font color="red">error:</font> member reference base type 'pid_t' (aka 'int') is not a structure or union
   <font color="darkgreen">  myvar = myvar.x;</font>
   <font color="blue">          ~~~~~ ^</font>
 </pre>

 <p>In C++, type preservation includes retaining any qualification written into type names. For example, if we take a small snippet of code such as:

 <blockquote>
 <pre>
 namespace services {
   struct WebService {  };
 }
 namespace myapp {
   namespace servers {
     struct Server {  };
   }
 }

 using namespace myapp;
 void addHTTPService(servers::Server const &;amp;server, ::services::WebService const *http) {
   server += http;
 }
 </pre>
 </blockquote>

 <p>and then compile it, we see that Clang is both providing more accurate information and is retaining the types as written by the user (e.g., "servers::Server", "::services::WebService"):

 <pre>
   $ <b>g++-4.2 -fsyntax-only t.cpp</b>
   t.cpp:9: error: no match for 'operator+=' in 'server += http'
   $ <b>clang -fsyntax-only t.cpp</b>
   t.cpp:9:10: <font color="red">error:</font> invalid operands to binary expression ('servers::Server const' and '::services::WebService const *')
     <font color="darkgreen">server += http;</font>
     <font color="blue">~~~~~~ ^  ~~~~</font>
 </pre>

 <p>Naturally, type preservation extends to uses of templates, and Clang retains information about how a particular template specialization (like <code>std::vector&lt;Real&gt;</code>) was spelled within the source code. For example:</p>

 <pre>
   $ <b>g++-4.2 -fsyntax-only t.cpp</b>
   t.cpp:12: error: no match for 'operator=' in 'str = vec'
   $ <b>clang -fsyntax-only t.cpp</b>
   t.cpp:12:7: <font color="red">error:</font> incompatible type assigning 'vector&lt;Real&gt;', expected 'std::string' (aka 'class std::basic_string&lt;char&gt;')
     <font color="darkgreen">str = vec</font>;
         <font color="blue">^ ~~~</font>
 </pre>

 <h2>Fix-it Hints</h2>

 <p>"Fix-it" hints provide advice for fixing small, localized problems
 in source code. When Clang produces a diagnostic about a particular
 problem that it can work around (e.g., non-standard or redundant
 syntax, missing keywords, common mistakes, etc.), it may also provide
 specific guidance in the form of a code transformation to correct the
 problem. In the following example, Clang warns about the use of a GCC
 extension that has been considered obsolete since 1993. The underlined
 code should be removed, then replaced with the code below the
 caret line (".x =" or ".y =", respectively).</p>

 <pre>
   $ <b>clang t.c</b>
   t.c:5:28: <font color="magenta">warning:</font> use of GNU old-style field designator extension
   <font color="darkgreen">struct point origin = { x: 0.0, y: 0.0 };</font>
                           <font color="red">~~</font> <font color="blue">^</font>
                           <font color="darkgreen">.x = </font>
   t.c:5:36: <font color="magenta">warning:</font> use of GNU old-style field designator extension
   <font color="darkgreen">struct point origin = { x: 0.0, y: 0.0 };</font>
                                   <font color="red">~~</font> <font color="blue">^</font>
                                   <font color="darkgreen">.y = </font>
 </pre>

 <p>"Fix-it" hints are most useful for
 working around common user errors and misconceptions. For example, C++ users
 commonly forget the syntax for explicit specialization of class templates,
 as in the error in the following example. Again, after describing the problem,
 Clang provides the fix--add <code>template&lt;&gt;</code>--as part of the
 diagnostic.<p>

 <pre>
   $ <b>clang t.cpp</b>
   t.cpp:9:3: <font color="red">error:</font> template specialization requires 'template&lt;&gt;'
     struct iterator_traits&lt;file_iterator&gt; {
     <font color="blue">^</font>
     <font color="darkgreen">template&lt;&gt; </font>
 </pre>

 <h2>Automatic Macro Expansion</h2>

 <p>Many errors happen in macros that are sometimes deeply nested.  With
 traditional compilers, you need to dig deep into the definition of the macro to
 understand how you got into trouble.  The following simple example shows how
 Clang helps you out by automatically printing instantiation information and
 nested range information for diagnostics as they are instantiated through macros
 and also shows how some of the other pieces work in a bigger example.</p>

 <pre>
   $ <b>gcc-4.2 -fsyntax-only t.c</b>
   t.c: In function 'test':
   t.c:80: error: invalid operands to binary &lt; (have 'struct mystruct' and 'float')
   $ <b>clang -fsyntax-only t.c</b>
   t.c:80:3: <font color="red">error:</font> invalid operands to binary expression ('typeof(P)' (aka 'struct mystruct') and 'typeof(F)' (aka 'float'))
   <font color="darkgreen">  X = MYMAX(P, F);</font>
   <font color="blue">      ^~~~~~~~~~~</font>
   t.c:76:94: note: instantiated from:
   <font color="darkgreen">#define MYMAX(A,B)    __extension__ ({ __typeof__(A) __a = (A); __typeof__(B) __b = (B); __a &lt; __b ? __b : __a; })</font>
   <font color="blue">                                                                                         ~~~ ^ ~~~</font>
 </pre>

 <p>Here's another real world warning that occurs in the "window" Unix package (which
 implements the "wwopen" class of APIs):</p>

 <pre>
   $ <b>clang -fsyntax-only t.c</b>
   t.c:22:2: <font color="magenta">warning:</font> type specifier missing, defaults to 'int'
   <font color="darkgreen">        ILPAD();</font>
   <font color="blue">        ^</font>
   t.c:17:17: note: instantiated from:
   <font color="darkgreen">#define ILPAD() PAD((NROW - tt.tt_row) * 10)    /* 1 ms per char */</font>
   <font color="blue">                ^</font>
   t.c:14:2: note: instantiated from:
   <font color="darkgreen">        register i; \</font>
   <font color="blue">        ^</font>
 </pre>

 <p>In practice, we've found that Clang's treatment of macros is actually more useful in multiply nested
 macros that in simple ones.</p>

 <h2>Quality of Implementation and Attention to Detail</h2>

 <p>Finally, we have put a lot of work polishing the little things, because
 little things add up over time and contribute to a great user experience.</p>

 <p>The following example shows a trivial little tweak, where we tell you to put the semicolon at
 the end of the line that is missing it (line 4) instead of at the beginning of
 the following line (line 5).  This is particularly important with fixit hints
 and caret diagnostics, because otherwise you don't get the important context.
 </p>

 <pre>
   $ <b>gcc-4.2 t.c</b>
   t.c: In function 'foo':
   t.c:5: error: expected ';' before '}' token
   $ <b>clang t.c</b>
   t.c:4:8: <font color="red">error:</font> expected ';' after expression
   <font color="darkgreen">  bar()</font>
   <font color="blue">       ^</font>
   <font color="blue">       ;</font>
 </pre>

 <p>The following example shows much better error recovery than GCC. The message coming out
 of GCC is completely useless for diagnosing the problem. Clang tries much harder
 and produces a much more useful diagnosis of the problem.</p>

 <pre>
   $ <b>gcc-4.2 t.c</b>
   t.c:3: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before '*' token
   $ <b>clang t.c</b>
   t.c:3:1: <font color="red">error:</font> unknown type name 'foo_t'
   <font color="darkgreen">foo_t *P = 0;</font>
   <font color="blue">^</font>
 </pre>

 <p>The following example shows that we recover from the simple case of
 forgetting a ; after a struct definition much better than GCC.</p>

 <pre>
   $ <b>cat t.cc</b>
   template&lt;class T&gt;
   class a {}
   class temp {};
   a&lt;temp&gt; b;
   struct b {
   }
   $ <b>gcc-4.2 t.cc</b>
   t.cc:3: error: multiple types in one declaration
   t.cc:4: error: non-template type 'a' used as a template
   t.cc:4: error: invalid type in declaration before ';' token
   t.cc:6: error: expected unqualified-id at end of input
   $ <b>clang t.cc</b>
   t.cc:2:11: <font color="red">error:</font> expected ';' after class
   <font color="darkgreen">class a {}</font>
   <font color="blue">          ^</font>
   <font color="blue">          ;</font>
   t.cc:6:2: <font color="red">error:</font> expected ';' after struct
   <font color="darkgreen">}</font>
   <font color="blue"> ^</font>
   <font color="blue"> ;</font>
 </pre>

 <p>While each of these details is minor, we feel that they all add up to provide
 a much more polished experience.</p>

 </div>
 </body>
 </html>
	<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN"
	"http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">
	<html>
	<head>
	<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
	<title>Clang - Expressive Diagnostics</title>
	<link type="text/css" rel="stylesheet" href="menu.css" />
	<link type="text/css" rel="stylesheet" href="content.css" />
	<style type="text/css">
	</style>
	</head>
	<body>

	<!--#include virtual="menu.html.incl"-->

	<div id="content">


	<!--=======================================================================-->
	<h1>Expressive Diagnostics</h1>
	<!--=======================================================================-->

	<p>In addition to being fast and functional, we aim to make Clang extremely user
	friendly. As far as a command-line compiler goes, this basically boils down to
	making the diagnostics (error and warning messages) generated by the compiler
	be as useful as possible. There are several ways that we do this. This section
	talks about the experience provided by the command line compiler, contrasting
	Clang output to GCC 4.2's output in several examples.
	<!--
	Other clients
	that embed Clang and extract equivalent information through internal APIs.-->
	</p>

	<h2>Column Numbers and Caret Diagnostics</h2>

	<p>First, all diagnostics produced by clang include full column number
	information. The clang command-line compiler driver uses this information
	to print "caret diagnostics".
	(IDEs can use the information to display in-line error markup.)
	Precise error location in the source is a feature provided by many commercial
	compilers, but is generally missing from open source
	compilers. This is nice because it makes it very easy to understand exactly
	what is wrong in a particular piece of code</p>

	<p>The caret (the blue "^" character) exactly shows where the problem is, even
	inside of a string. This makes it really easy to jump to the problem and
	helps when multiple instances of the same character occur on a line. (We'll
	revisit this more in following examples.)</p>

	<pre>
	$ <b>gcc-4.2 -fsyntax-only -Wformat format-strings.c</b>
	format-strings.c:91: warning: too few arguments for format
	$ <b>clang -fsyntax-only format-strings.c</b>
	format-strings.c:91:13: <font color="magenta">warning:</font> '.*' specified field precision is missing a matching 'int' argument
	<font color="darkgreen"> printf("%.*d");</font>
	<font color="blue"> ^</font>
	</pre>

	<h2>Range Highlighting for Related Text</h2>

	<p>Clang captures and accurately tracks range information for expressions,
	statements, and other constructs in your program and uses this to make
	diagnostics highlight related information. In the following somewhat
	nonsensical example you can see that you don't even need to see the original source code to
	understand what is wrong based on the Clang error. Because clang prints a
	caret, you know exactly <em>which</em> plus it is complaining about. The range
	information highlights the left and right side of the plus which makes it
	immediately obvious what the compiler is talking about.
	Range information is very useful for
	cases involving precedence issues and many other cases.</p>

	<pre>
	$ <b>gcc-4.2 -fsyntax-only t.c</b>
	t.c:7: error: invalid operands to binary + (have 'int' and 'struct A')
	$ <b>clang -fsyntax-only t.c</b>
	t.c:7:39: <font color="red">error:</font> invalid operands to binary expression ('int' and 'struct A')
	<font color="darkgreen"> return y + func(y ? ((SomeA.X + 40) + SomeA) / 42 + SomeA.X : SomeA.X);</font>
	<font color="blue"> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~~~</font>
	</pre>

	<h2>Precision in Wording</h2>

	<p>A detail is that we have tried really hard to make the diagnostics that come
	out of clang contain exactly the pertinent information about what is wrong and
	why. In the example above, we tell you what the inferred types are for
	the left and right hand sides, and we don't repeat what is obvious from the
	caret (e.g., that this is a "binary +").</p>

	<p>Many other examples abound. In the following example, not only do we tell you that there is a problem with the *
	and point to it, we say exactly why and tell you what the type is (in case it is
	a complicated subexpression, such as a call to an overloaded function). This
	sort of attention to detail makes it much easier to understand and fix problems
	quickly.</p>

	<pre>
	$ <b>gcc-4.2 -fsyntax-only t.c</b>
	t.c:5: error: invalid type argument of 'unary *'
	$ <b>clang -fsyntax-only t.c</b>
	t.c:5:11: <font color="red">error:</font> indirection requires pointer operand ('int' invalid)
	<font color="darkgreen"> int y = *SomeA.X;</font>
	<font color="blue"> ^~~~~~~~</font>
	</pre>

	<h2>No Pretty Printing of Expressions in Diagnostics</h2>

	<p>Since Clang has range highlighting, it never needs to pretty print your code
	back out to you. GCC can produce inscrutible error messages in some cases when
	it tries to do this. In this example P and Q have type "int*":</p>

	<pre>
	$ <b>gcc-4.2 -fsyntax-only t.c</b>
	#'exact_div_expr' not supported by pp_c_expression#'t.c:12: error: called object is not a function
	$ <b>clang -fsyntax-only t.c</b>
	t.c:12:8: <font color="red">error:</font> called object type 'int' is not a function or function pointer
	<font color="darkgreen"> (P-Q)();</font>
	<font color="blue"> ~~~~~^</font>
	</pre>

	<p>This can be particularly bad in G++, which often emits errors
	containing lowered vtable references. For example:</p>

	<pre>
	$ <b>cat t.cc</b>
	struct a {
	virtual int bar();
	};

	struct foo : public virtual a {
	};

	void test(foo *P) {
	return P->bar() + *P;
	}
	$ <b>gcc-4.2 t.cc</b>
	t.cc: In function 'void test(foo*)':
	t.cc:9: error: no match for 'operator+' in '(((a)P) + ((long int)(P->foo::<anonymous>.a::_vptr$a + -0x00000000000000020)))->a::bar() + P'
	t.cc:9: error: return-statement with a value, in function returning 'void'
	$ <b>clang t.cc</b>
	t.cc:9:18: <font color="red">error:</font> invalid operands to binary expression ('int' and 'foo')
	<font color="darkgreen"> return P->bar() + *P;</font>
	<font color="blue"> ~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~</font>
	</pre>


	<h2>Typedef Preservation and Selective Unwrapping</h2>

	<p>Many programmers use high-level user defined types, typedefs, and other
	syntactic sugar to refer to types in their program. This is useful because they
	can abbreviate otherwise very long types and it is useful to preserve the
	typename in diagnostics. However, sometimes very simple typedefs can wrap
	trivial types and it is important to strip off the typedef to understand what
	is going on. Clang aims to handle both cases well.<p>

	<p>The following example shows where it is important to preserve
	a typedef in C. Here the type printed by GCC isn't even valid, but if the error
	were about a very long and complicated type (as often happens in C++) the error
	message would be ugly just because it was long and hard to read.</p>

	<pre>
	$ <b>gcc-4.2 -fsyntax-only t.c</b>
	t.c:15: error: invalid operands to binary / (have 'float __vector__' and 'const int *')
	$ <b>clang -fsyntax-only t.c</b>
	t.c:15:11: <font color="red">error:</font> can't convert between vector values of different size ('__m128' and 'int const *')
	<font color="darkgreen"> myvec[1]/P;</font>
	<font color="blue"> ~~~~~~~~^~</font>
	</pre>

	<p>The following example shows where it is useful for the compiler to expose
	underlying details of a typedef. If the user was somehow confused about how the
	system "pid_t" typedef is defined, Clang helpfully displays it with "aka".</p>

	<pre>
	$ <b>gcc-4.2 -fsyntax-only t.c</b>
	t.c:13: error: request for member 'x' in something not a structure or union
	$ <b>clang -fsyntax-only t.c</b>
	t.c:13:9: <font color="red">error:</font> member reference base type 'pid_t' (aka 'int') is not a structure or union
	<font color="darkgreen"> myvar = myvar.x;</font>
	<font color="blue"> ~~~~~ ^</font>
	</pre>

	<p>In C++, type preservation includes retaining any qualification written into type names. For example, if we take a small snippet of code such as:

	<blockquote>
	<pre>
	namespace services {
	struct WebService { };
	}
	namespace myapp {
	namespace servers {
	struct Server { };
	}
	}

	using namespace myapp;
	void addHTTPService(servers::Server const &;amp;server, ::services::WebService const *http) {
	server += http;
	}
	</pre>
	</blockquote>

	<p>and then compile it, we see that Clang is both providing more accurate information and is retaining the types as written by the user (e.g., "servers::Server", "::services::WebService"):

	<pre>
	$ <b>g++-4.2 -fsyntax-only t.cpp</b>
	t.cpp:9: error: no match for 'operator+=' in 'server += http'
	$ <b>clang -fsyntax-only t.cpp</b>
	t.cpp:9:10: <font color="red">error:</font> invalid operands to binary expression ('servers::Server const' and '::services::WebService const *')
	<font color="darkgreen">server += http;</font>
	<font color="blue">~~~~~~ ^ ~~~~</font>
	</pre>

	<p>Naturally, type preservation extends to uses of templates, and Clang retains information about how a particular template specialization (like <code>std::vector<Real></code>) was spelled within the source code. For example:</p>

	<pre>
	$ <b>g++-4.2 -fsyntax-only t.cpp</b>
	t.cpp:12: error: no match for 'operator=' in 'str = vec'
	$ <b>clang -fsyntax-only t.cpp</b>
	t.cpp:12:7: <font color="red">error:</font> incompatible type assigning 'vector<Real>', expected 'std::string' (aka 'class std::basic_string<char>')
	<font color="darkgreen">str = vec</font>;
	<font color="blue">^ ~~~</font>
	</pre>

	<h2>Fix-it Hints</h2>

	<p>"Fix-it" hints provide advice for fixing small, localized problems
	in source code. When Clang produces a diagnostic about a particular
	problem that it can work around (e.g., non-standard or redundant
	syntax, missing keywords, common mistakes, etc.), it may also provide
	specific guidance in the form of a code transformation to correct the
	problem. In the following example, Clang warns about the use of a GCC
	extension that has been considered obsolete since 1993. The underlined
	code should be removed, then replaced with the code below the
	caret line (".x =" or ".y =", respectively).</p>

	<pre>
	$ <b>clang t.c</b>
	t.c:5:28: <font color="magenta">warning:</font> use of GNU old-style field designator extension
	<font color="darkgreen">struct point origin = { x: 0.0, y: 0.0 };</font>
	<font color="red">~~</font> <font color="blue">^</font>
	<font color="darkgreen">.x = </font>
	t.c:5:36: <font color="magenta">warning:</font> use of GNU old-style field designator extension
	<font color="darkgreen">struct point origin = { x: 0.0, y: 0.0 };</font>
	<font color="red">~~</font> <font color="blue">^</font>
	<font color="darkgreen">.y = </font>
	</pre>

	<p>"Fix-it" hints are most useful for
	working around common user errors and misconceptions. For example, C++ users
	commonly forget the syntax for explicit specialization of class templates,
	as in the error in the following example. Again, after describing the problem,
	Clang provides the fix--add <code>template<></code>--as part of the
	diagnostic.<p>

	<pre>
	$ <b>clang t.cpp</b>
	t.cpp:9:3: <font color="red">error:</font> template specialization requires 'template<>'
	struct iterator_traits<file_iterator> {
	<font color="blue">^</font>
	<font color="darkgreen">template<> </font>
	</pre>

	<h2>Automatic Macro Expansion</h2>

	<p>Many errors happen in macros that are sometimes deeply nested. With
	traditional compilers, you need to dig deep into the definition of the macro to
	understand how you got into trouble. The following simple example shows how
	Clang helps you out by automatically printing instantiation information and
	nested range information for diagnostics as they are instantiated through macros
	and also shows how some of the other pieces work in a bigger example.</p>

	<pre>
	$ <b>gcc-4.2 -fsyntax-only t.c</b>
	t.c: In function 'test':
	t.c:80: error: invalid operands to binary < (have 'struct mystruct' and 'float')
	$ <b>clang -fsyntax-only t.c</b>
	t.c:80:3: <font color="red">error:</font> invalid operands to binary expression ('typeof(P)' (aka 'struct mystruct') and 'typeof(F)' (aka 'float'))
	<font color="darkgreen"> X = MYMAX(P, F);</font>
	<font color="blue"> ^~~~~~~~~~~</font>
	t.c:76:94: note: instantiated from:
	<font color="darkgreen">#define MYMAX(A,B) __extension__ ({ __typeof__(A) __a = (A); __typeof__(B) __b = (B); __a < __b ? __b : __a; })</font>
	<font color="blue"> ~~~ ^ ~~~</font>
	</pre>

	<p>Here's another real world warning that occurs in the "window" Unix package (which
	implements the "wwopen" class of APIs):</p>

	<pre>
	$ <b>clang -fsyntax-only t.c</b>
	t.c:22:2: <font color="magenta">warning:</font> type specifier missing, defaults to 'int'
	<font color="darkgreen"> ILPAD();</font>
	<font color="blue"> ^</font>
	t.c:17:17: note: instantiated from:
	<font color="darkgreen">#define ILPAD() PAD((NROW - tt.tt_row) * 10) /* 1 ms per char */</font>
	<font color="blue"> ^</font>
	t.c:14:2: note: instantiated from:
	<font color="darkgreen"> register i; \</font>
	<font color="blue"> ^</font>
	</pre>

	<p>In practice, we've found that Clang's treatment of macros is actually more useful in multiply nested
	macros that in simple ones.</p>

	<h2>Quality of Implementation and Attention to Detail</h2>

	<p>Finally, we have put a lot of work polishing the little things, because
	little things add up over time and contribute to a great user experience.</p>

	<p>The following example shows a trivial little tweak, where we tell you to put the semicolon at
	the end of the line that is missing it (line 4) instead of at the beginning of
	the following line (line 5). This is particularly important with fixit hints
	and caret diagnostics, because otherwise you don't get the important context.
	</p>

	<pre>
	$ <b>gcc-4.2 t.c</b>
	t.c: In function 'foo':
	t.c:5: error: expected ';' before '}' token
	$ <b>clang t.c</b>
	t.c:4:8: <font color="red">error:</font> expected ';' after expression
	<font color="darkgreen"> bar()</font>
	<font color="blue"> ^</font>
	<font color="blue"> ;</font>
	</pre>

	<p>The following example shows much better error recovery than GCC. The message coming out
	of GCC is completely useless for diagnosing the problem. Clang tries much harder
	and produces a much more useful diagnosis of the problem.</p>

	<pre>
	$ <b>gcc-4.2 t.c</b>
	t.c:3: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before '*' token
	$ <b>clang t.c</b>
	t.c:3:1: <font color="red">error:</font> unknown type name 'foo_t'
	<font color="darkgreen">foo_t *P = 0;</font>
	<font color="blue">^</font>
	</pre>

	<p>The following example shows that we recover from the simple case of
	forgetting a ; after a struct definition much better than GCC.</p>

	<pre>
	$ <b>cat t.cc</b>
	template<class T>
	class a {}
	class temp {};
	a<temp> b;
	struct b {
	}
	$ <b>gcc-4.2 t.cc</b>
	t.cc:3: error: multiple types in one declaration
	t.cc:4: error: non-template type 'a' used as a template
	t.cc:4: error: invalid type in declaration before ';' token
	t.cc:6: error: expected unqualified-id at end of input
	$ <b>clang t.cc</b>
	t.cc:2:11: <font color="red">error:</font> expected ';' after class
	<font color="darkgreen">class a {}</font>
	<font color="blue"> ^</font>
	<font color="blue"> ;</font>
	t.cc:6:2: <font color="red">error:</font> expected ';' after struct
	<font color="darkgreen">}</font>
	<font color="blue"> ^</font>
	<font color="blue"> ;</font>
	</pre>

	<p>While each of these details is minor, we feel that they all add up to provide
	a much more polished experience.</p>

	</div>
	</body>
	</html>