blob: fc008963c317cc927f7670f785fb2682950125d8 [file] [log] [blame]
Daniel Dunbard7f7d082010-06-29 22:00:45 +00001// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple x86_64 -emit-llvm -o - %s | FileCheck %s
2
3// Check that we don't generate unnecessary reloads.
4//
5// CHECK: define void @f0()
6// CHECK: [[x_0:%.*]] = alloca i32, align 4
7// CHECK-NEXT: [[y_0:%.*]] = alloca i32, align 4
8// CHECK-NEXT: store i32 1, i32* [[x_0]]
9// CHECK-NEXT: store i32 1, i32* [[x_0]]
10// CHECK-NEXT: store i32 1, i32* [[y_0]]
11// CHECK: }
12void f0() {
13 int x, y;
14 x = 1;
15 y = (x = 1);
16}
17
John McCallb418d742010-11-16 10:08:07 +000018// This used to test that we generate reloads for volatile access,
19// but that does not appear to be correct behavior for C.
Daniel Dunbard7f7d082010-06-29 22:00:45 +000020//
21// CHECK: define void @f1()
22// CHECK: [[x_1:%.*]] = alloca i32, align 4
23// CHECK-NEXT: [[y_1:%.*]] = alloca i32, align 4
Eli Friedmana40b7f22011-08-12 23:33:52 +000024// CHECK-NEXT: store volatile i32 1, i32* [[x_1]]
25// CHECK-NEXT: store volatile i32 1, i32* [[x_1]]
26// CHECK-NEXT: store volatile i32 1, i32* [[y_1]]
Daniel Dunbard7f7d082010-06-29 22:00:45 +000027// CHECK: }
28void f1() {
29 volatile int x, y;
30 x = 1;
31 y = (x = 1);
32}