blob: 8b66ff6cad12f38cb872aadc465e432c97e9c61e [file] [log] [blame]
Chris Lattner4c9df7c2002-08-02 16:43:03 +00001//===- PostDominators.cpp - Post-Dominator Calculation --------------------===//
Chris Lattner17152292001-07-02 05:46:38 +00002//
Chris Lattner4c9df7c2002-08-02 16:43:03 +00003// This file implements the post-dominator construction algorithms.
Chris Lattner17152292001-07-02 05:46:38 +00004//
5//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
6
Chris Lattnera69fd902002-08-21 23:43:50 +00007#include "llvm/Analysis/PostDominators.h"
Chris Lattnerfc514f42002-05-07 19:18:48 +00008#include "llvm/Transforms/Utils/UnifyFunctionExitNodes.h"
Chris Lattner221d6882002-02-12 21:07:25 +00009#include "llvm/Support/CFG.h"
Chris Lattnercee8f9a2001-11-27 00:03:19 +000010#include "Support/DepthFirstIterator.h"
Chris Lattnereb5230c2002-02-05 03:35:31 +000011#include "Support/SetOperations.h"
Chris Lattner697954c2002-01-20 22:54:45 +000012using std::set;
13
Chris Lattner94108ab2001-07-06 16:58:22 +000014//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
Chris Lattner4c9df7c2002-08-02 16:43:03 +000015// PostDominatorSet Implementation
Chris Lattner17152292001-07-02 05:46:38 +000016//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
17
Chris Lattner1e435162002-07-26 21:12:44 +000018static RegisterAnalysis<PostDominatorSet>
Chris Lattner17689df2002-07-30 16:27:52 +000019B("postdomset", "Post-Dominator Set Construction", true);
Chris Lattner94108ab2001-07-06 16:58:22 +000020
Chris Lattnerce6ef112002-07-26 18:40:14 +000021// Postdominator set construction. This converts the specified function to only
22// have a single exit node (return stmt), then calculates the post dominance
23// sets for the function.
Chris Lattner94108ab2001-07-06 16:58:22 +000024//
Chris Lattnerce6ef112002-07-26 18:40:14 +000025bool PostDominatorSet::runOnFunction(Function &F) {
26 Doms.clear(); // Reset from the last time we were run...
Chris Lattner93193f82002-01-31 00:42:27 +000027 // Since we require that the unify all exit nodes pass has been run, we know
Chris Lattner2fbfdcf2002-04-07 20:49:59 +000028 // that there can be at most one return instruction in the function left.
Chris Lattner93193f82002-01-31 00:42:27 +000029 // Get it.
30 //
Chris Lattner483e14e2002-04-27 07:27:19 +000031 Root = getAnalysis<UnifyFunctionExitNodes>().getExitNode();
Chris Lattner94108ab2001-07-06 16:58:22 +000032
Chris Lattner2fbfdcf2002-04-07 20:49:59 +000033 if (Root == 0) { // No exit node for the function? Postdomsets are all empty
Chris Lattner7e708292002-06-25 16:13:24 +000034 for (Function::iterator FI = F.begin(), FE = F.end(); FI != FE; ++FI)
35 Doms[FI] = DomSetType();
Chris Lattnerce6ef112002-07-26 18:40:14 +000036 return false;
Chris Lattner384e5b12001-08-23 17:07:19 +000037 }
Chris Lattner94108ab2001-07-06 16:58:22 +000038
39 bool Changed;
40 do {
41 Changed = false;
42
43 set<const BasicBlock*> Visited;
44 DomSetType WorkingSet;
Chris Lattner93193f82002-01-31 00:42:27 +000045 idf_iterator<BasicBlock*> It = idf_begin(Root), End = idf_end(Root);
Chris Lattner94108ab2001-07-06 16:58:22 +000046 for ( ; It != End; ++It) {
Chris Lattnera298d272002-04-28 00:15:57 +000047 BasicBlock *BB = *It;
48 succ_iterator PI = succ_begin(BB), PEnd = succ_end(BB);
Chris Lattner94108ab2001-07-06 16:58:22 +000049 if (PI != PEnd) { // Is there SOME predecessor?
50 // Loop until we get to a successor that has had it's dom set filled
51 // in at least once. We are guaranteed to have this because we are
52 // traversing the graph in DFO and have handled start nodes specially.
53 //
54 while (Doms[*PI].size() == 0) ++PI;
55 WorkingSet = Doms[*PI];
56
57 for (++PI; PI != PEnd; ++PI) { // Intersect all of the successor sets
58 DomSetType &PredSet = Doms[*PI];
59 if (PredSet.size())
60 set_intersect(WorkingSet, PredSet);
61 }
62 }
63
64 WorkingSet.insert(BB); // A block always dominates itself
65 DomSetType &BBSet = Doms[BB];
66 if (BBSet != WorkingSet) {
67 BBSet.swap(WorkingSet); // Constant time operation!
68 Changed = true; // The sets changed.
69 }
70 WorkingSet.clear(); // Clear out the set for next iteration
71 }
72 } while (Changed);
Chris Lattnerce6ef112002-07-26 18:40:14 +000073 return false;
Chris Lattner17152292001-07-02 05:46:38 +000074}
75
Chris Lattnerce6ef112002-07-26 18:40:14 +000076// getAnalysisUsage - This obviously provides a post-dominator set, but it also
77// requires the UnifyFunctionExitNodes pass.
Chris Lattner93193f82002-01-31 00:42:27 +000078//
Chris Lattnerce6ef112002-07-26 18:40:14 +000079void PostDominatorSet::getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage &AU) const {
Chris Lattnerf57b8452002-04-27 06:56:12 +000080 AU.setPreservesAll();
Chris Lattnerdd5b4952002-08-08 19:01:28 +000081 AU.addRequired<UnifyFunctionExitNodes>();
Chris Lattner93193f82002-01-31 00:42:27 +000082}
83
Chris Lattner17152292001-07-02 05:46:38 +000084//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
Chris Lattner4c9df7c2002-08-02 16:43:03 +000085// ImmediatePostDominators Implementation
Chris Lattner17152292001-07-02 05:46:38 +000086//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
87
Chris Lattner1e435162002-07-26 21:12:44 +000088static RegisterAnalysis<ImmediatePostDominators>
Chris Lattner17689df2002-07-30 16:27:52 +000089D("postidom", "Immediate Post-Dominators Construction", true);
Chris Lattner93193f82002-01-31 00:42:27 +000090
Chris Lattner17152292001-07-02 05:46:38 +000091//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
Chris Lattner4c9df7c2002-08-02 16:43:03 +000092// PostDominatorTree Implementation
Chris Lattner17152292001-07-02 05:46:38 +000093//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
94
Chris Lattner1e435162002-07-26 21:12:44 +000095static RegisterAnalysis<PostDominatorTree>
Chris Lattner17689df2002-07-30 16:27:52 +000096F("postdomtree", "Post-Dominator Tree Construction", true);
Chris Lattner93193f82002-01-31 00:42:27 +000097
Chris Lattnerce6ef112002-07-26 18:40:14 +000098void PostDominatorTree::calculate(const PostDominatorSet &DS) {
99 Nodes[Root] = new Node(Root, 0); // Add a node for the root...
100
101 if (Root) {
Chris Lattner94108ab2001-07-06 16:58:22 +0000102 // Iterate over all nodes in depth first order...
Chris Lattner93193f82002-01-31 00:42:27 +0000103 for (idf_iterator<BasicBlock*> I = idf_begin(Root), E = idf_end(Root);
Chris Lattner3ff43872001-09-28 22:56:31 +0000104 I != E; ++I) {
Chris Lattnera298d272002-04-28 00:15:57 +0000105 BasicBlock *BB = *I;
Chris Lattner94108ab2001-07-06 16:58:22 +0000106 const DominatorSet::DomSetType &Dominators = DS.getDominators(BB);
107 unsigned DomSetSize = Dominators.size();
108 if (DomSetSize == 1) continue; // Root node... IDom = null
109
Chris Lattner3ff43872001-09-28 22:56:31 +0000110 // Loop over all dominators of this node. This corresponds to looping
111 // over nodes in the dominator chain, looking for a node whose dominator
112 // set is equal to the current nodes, except that the current node does
113 // not exist in it. This means that it is one level higher in the dom
114 // chain than the current node, and it is our idom! We know that we have
115 // already added a DominatorTree node for our idom, because the idom must
116 // be a predecessor in the depth first order that we are iterating through
Chris Lattner2fbfdcf2002-04-07 20:49:59 +0000117 // the function.
Chris Lattner94108ab2001-07-06 16:58:22 +0000118 //
119 DominatorSet::DomSetType::const_iterator I = Dominators.begin();
120 DominatorSet::DomSetType::const_iterator End = Dominators.end();
121 for (; I != End; ++I) { // Iterate over dominators...
Chris Lattner93193f82002-01-31 00:42:27 +0000122 // All of our dominators should form a chain, where the number
123 // of elements in the dominator set indicates what level the
124 // node is at in the chain. We want the node immediately
125 // above us, so it will have an identical dominator set,
126 // except that BB will not dominate it... therefore it's
Chris Lattner94108ab2001-07-06 16:58:22 +0000127 // dominator set size will be one less than BB's...
128 //
129 if (DS.getDominators(*I).size() == DomSetSize - 1) {
130 // We know that the immediate dominator should already have a node,
131 // because we are traversing the CFG in depth first order!
132 //
133 Node *IDomNode = Nodes[*I];
134 assert(IDomNode && "No node for IDOM?");
135
136 // Add a new tree node for this BasicBlock, and link it as a child of
137 // IDomNode
138 Nodes[BB] = IDomNode->addChild(new Node(BB, IDomNode));
139 break;
140 }
Chris Lattner17152292001-07-02 05:46:38 +0000141 }
142 }
143 }
144}
145
Chris Lattner17152292001-07-02 05:46:38 +0000146//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
Chris Lattner4c9df7c2002-08-02 16:43:03 +0000147// PostDominanceFrontier Implementation
Chris Lattner17152292001-07-02 05:46:38 +0000148//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
149
Chris Lattner1e435162002-07-26 21:12:44 +0000150static RegisterAnalysis<PostDominanceFrontier>
Chris Lattner17689df2002-07-30 16:27:52 +0000151H("postdomfrontier", "Post-Dominance Frontier Construction", true);
Chris Lattner93193f82002-01-31 00:42:27 +0000152
Chris Lattner1b7f7dc2002-04-28 16:21:30 +0000153const DominanceFrontier::DomSetType &
Chris Lattnerce6ef112002-07-26 18:40:14 +0000154PostDominanceFrontier::calculate(const PostDominatorTree &DT,
155 const DominatorTree::Node *Node) {
Chris Lattner94108ab2001-07-06 16:58:22 +0000156 // Loop over CFG successors to calculate DFlocal[Node]
Chris Lattnera298d272002-04-28 00:15:57 +0000157 BasicBlock *BB = Node->getNode();
Chris Lattner94108ab2001-07-06 16:58:22 +0000158 DomSetType &S = Frontiers[BB]; // The new set to fill in...
Chris Lattner384e5b12001-08-23 17:07:19 +0000159 if (!Root) return S;
Chris Lattner94108ab2001-07-06 16:58:22 +0000160
Chris Lattnera298d272002-04-28 00:15:57 +0000161 for (pred_iterator SI = pred_begin(BB), SE = pred_end(BB);
Chris Lattner455889a2002-02-12 22:39:50 +0000162 SI != SE; ++SI) {
Chris Lattner94108ab2001-07-06 16:58:22 +0000163 // Does Node immediately dominate this predeccessor?
164 if (DT[*SI]->getIDom() != Node)
165 S.insert(*SI);
166 }
167
168 // At this point, S is DFlocal. Now we union in DFup's of our children...
169 // Loop through and visit the nodes that Node immediately dominates (Node's
170 // children in the IDomTree)
171 //
Chris Lattnerce6ef112002-07-26 18:40:14 +0000172 for (PostDominatorTree::Node::const_iterator
173 NI = Node->begin(), NE = Node->end(); NI != NE; ++NI) {
Chris Lattner94108ab2001-07-06 16:58:22 +0000174 DominatorTree::Node *IDominee = *NI;
Chris Lattnerce6ef112002-07-26 18:40:14 +0000175 const DomSetType &ChildDF = calculate(DT, IDominee);
Chris Lattner94108ab2001-07-06 16:58:22 +0000176
177 DomSetType::const_iterator CDFI = ChildDF.begin(), CDFE = ChildDF.end();
178 for (; CDFI != CDFE; ++CDFI) {
179 if (!Node->dominates(DT[*CDFI]))
180 S.insert(*CDFI);
181 }
182 }
183
184 return S;
185}
Chris Lattnera69fd902002-08-21 23:43:50 +0000186
187// stub - a dummy function to make linking work ok.
188void PostDominanceFrontier::stub() {
189}