blob: a71007b61616d9485f56d39f7606ebef98f99b25 [file] [log] [blame]
Daniel Dunbar3b709d52012-05-08 16:50:35 +00001FileCheck - Flexible pattern matching file verifier
2===================================================
3
Daniel Dunbar3b709d52012-05-08 16:50:35 +00004SYNOPSIS
5--------
6
Dmitri Gribenkoc8c3dbd2012-11-29 19:21:02 +00007:program:`FileCheck` *match-filename* [*--check-prefix=XXX*] [*--strict-whitespace*]
Daniel Dunbar3b709d52012-05-08 16:50:35 +00008
Daniel Dunbar3b709d52012-05-08 16:50:35 +00009DESCRIPTION
10-----------
11
Dmitri Gribenkoc8c3dbd2012-11-29 19:21:02 +000012:program:`FileCheck` reads two files (one from standard input, and one
13specified on the command line) and uses one to verify the other. This
14behavior is particularly useful for the testsuite, which wants to verify that
15the output of some tool (e.g. :program:`llc`) contains the expected information
16(for example, a movsd from esp or whatever is interesting). This is similar to
17using :program:`grep`, but it is optimized for matching multiple different
18inputs in one file in a specific order.
Daniel Dunbar3b709d52012-05-08 16:50:35 +000019
Dmitri Gribenkoc8c3dbd2012-11-29 19:21:02 +000020The ``match-filename`` file specifies the file that contains the patterns to
Stephen Lineeea96d2013-07-14 18:12:25 +000021match. The file to verify is read from standard input unless the
22:option:`--input-file` option is used.
Daniel Dunbar3b709d52012-05-08 16:50:35 +000023
Daniel Dunbar3b709d52012-05-08 16:50:35 +000024OPTIONS
25-------
26
Dmitri Gribenkoc8c3dbd2012-11-29 19:21:02 +000027.. option:: -help
Daniel Dunbar3b709d52012-05-08 16:50:35 +000028
29 Print a summary of command line options.
30
Dmitri Gribenkoc8c3dbd2012-11-29 19:21:02 +000031.. option:: --check-prefix prefix
Daniel Dunbar3b709d52012-05-08 16:50:35 +000032
Dmitri Gribenkoc8c3dbd2012-11-29 19:21:02 +000033 FileCheck searches the contents of ``match-filename`` for patterns to match.
34 By default, these patterns are prefixed with "``CHECK:``". If you'd like to
35 use a different prefix (e.g. because the same input file is checking multiple
36 different tool or options), the :option:`--check-prefix` argument allows you
37 to specify a specific prefix to match.
Daniel Dunbar3b709d52012-05-08 16:50:35 +000038
Dmitri Gribenkoc8c3dbd2012-11-29 19:21:02 +000039.. option:: --input-file filename
Eli Benderskyc78bb702012-11-07 01:41:30 +000040
41 File to check (defaults to stdin).
42
Dmitri Gribenkoc8c3dbd2012-11-29 19:21:02 +000043.. option:: --strict-whitespace
Daniel Dunbar3b709d52012-05-08 16:50:35 +000044
45 By default, FileCheck canonicalizes input horizontal whitespace (spaces and
46 tabs) which causes it to ignore these differences (a space will match a tab).
Guy Benyei4cc74fc2013-02-06 20:40:38 +000047 The :option:`--strict-whitespace` argument disables this behavior. End-of-line
Sean Silvaa5706fc2013-06-21 00:27:54 +000048 sequences are canonicalized to UNIX-style ``\n`` in all modes.
Daniel Dunbar3b709d52012-05-08 16:50:35 +000049
Dmitri Gribenkoc8c3dbd2012-11-29 19:21:02 +000050.. option:: -version
Daniel Dunbar3b709d52012-05-08 16:50:35 +000051
52 Show the version number of this program.
53
Daniel Dunbar3b709d52012-05-08 16:50:35 +000054EXIT STATUS
55-----------
56
Dmitri Gribenkoc8c3dbd2012-11-29 19:21:02 +000057If :program:`FileCheck` verifies that the file matches the expected contents,
58it exits with 0. Otherwise, if not, or if an error occurs, it will exit with a
59non-zero value.
Daniel Dunbar3b709d52012-05-08 16:50:35 +000060
Daniel Dunbar3b709d52012-05-08 16:50:35 +000061TUTORIAL
62--------
63
Daniel Dunbar3b709d52012-05-08 16:50:35 +000064FileCheck is typically used from LLVM regression tests, being invoked on the RUN
65line of the test. A simple example of using FileCheck from a RUN line looks
66like this:
67
Dmitri Gribenko0d887a02012-06-12 15:45:07 +000068.. code-block:: llvm
Daniel Dunbar3b709d52012-05-08 16:50:35 +000069
70 ; RUN: llvm-as < %s | llc -march=x86-64 | FileCheck %s
71
Dmitri Gribenko0fab1912012-11-14 19:42:32 +000072This syntax says to pipe the current file ("``%s``") into ``llvm-as``, pipe
73that into ``llc``, then pipe the output of ``llc`` into ``FileCheck``. This
74means that FileCheck will be verifying its standard input (the llc output)
75against the filename argument specified (the original ``.ll`` file specified by
76"``%s``"). To see how this works, let's look at the rest of the ``.ll`` file
77(after the RUN line):
Daniel Dunbar3b709d52012-05-08 16:50:35 +000078
Dmitri Gribenko0d887a02012-06-12 15:45:07 +000079.. code-block:: llvm
Daniel Dunbar3b709d52012-05-08 16:50:35 +000080
81 define void @sub1(i32* %p, i32 %v) {
82 entry:
83 ; CHECK: sub1:
84 ; CHECK: subl
85 %0 = tail call i32 @llvm.atomic.load.sub.i32.p0i32(i32* %p, i32 %v)
86 ret void
87 }
88
89 define void @inc4(i64* %p) {
90 entry:
91 ; CHECK: inc4:
92 ; CHECK: incq
93 %0 = tail call i64 @llvm.atomic.load.add.i64.p0i64(i64* %p, i64 1)
94 ret void
95 }
96
Dmitri Gribenko0fab1912012-11-14 19:42:32 +000097Here you can see some "``CHECK:``" lines specified in comments. Now you can
98see how the file is piped into ``llvm-as``, then ``llc``, and the machine code
99output is what we are verifying. FileCheck checks the machine code output to
100verify that it matches what the "``CHECK:``" lines specify.
Daniel Dunbar3b709d52012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000101
Dmitri Gribenko0fab1912012-11-14 19:42:32 +0000102The syntax of the "``CHECK:``" lines is very simple: they are fixed strings that
Daniel Dunbar3b709d52012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000103must occur in order. FileCheck defaults to ignoring horizontal whitespace
104differences (e.g. a space is allowed to match a tab) but otherwise, the contents
Dmitri Gribenko0fab1912012-11-14 19:42:32 +0000105of the "``CHECK:``" line is required to match some thing in the test file exactly.
Daniel Dunbar3b709d52012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000106
107One nice thing about FileCheck (compared to grep) is that it allows merging
108test cases together into logical groups. For example, because the test above
Dmitri Gribenko0fab1912012-11-14 19:42:32 +0000109is checking for the "``sub1:``" and "``inc4:``" labels, it will not match
110unless there is a "``subl``" in between those labels. If it existed somewhere
111else in the file, that would not count: "``grep subl``" matches if "``subl``"
112exists anywhere in the file.
Daniel Dunbar3b709d52012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000113
114The FileCheck -check-prefix option
115~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
116
Dmitri Gribenkoc8c3dbd2012-11-29 19:21:02 +0000117The FileCheck :option:`-check-prefix` option allows multiple test
118configurations to be driven from one `.ll` file. This is useful in many
119circumstances, for example, testing different architectural variants with
120:program:`llc`. Here's a simple example:
Daniel Dunbar3b709d52012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000121
Dmitri Gribenko0d887a02012-06-12 15:45:07 +0000122.. code-block:: llvm
Daniel Dunbar3b709d52012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000123
124 ; RUN: llvm-as < %s | llc -mtriple=i686-apple-darwin9 -mattr=sse41 \
Dmitri Gribenko32f9bca2012-06-12 00:48:47 +0000125 ; RUN: | FileCheck %s -check-prefix=X32
Daniel Dunbar3b709d52012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000126 ; RUN: llvm-as < %s | llc -mtriple=x86_64-apple-darwin9 -mattr=sse41 \
Dmitri Gribenko32f9bca2012-06-12 00:48:47 +0000127 ; RUN: | FileCheck %s -check-prefix=X64
Daniel Dunbar3b709d52012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000128
129 define <4 x i32> @pinsrd_1(i32 %s, <4 x i32> %tmp) nounwind {
130 %tmp1 = insertelement <4 x i32>; %tmp, i32 %s, i32 1
131 ret <4 x i32> %tmp1
132 ; X32: pinsrd_1:
133 ; X32: pinsrd $1, 4(%esp), %xmm0
134
135 ; X64: pinsrd_1:
136 ; X64: pinsrd $1, %edi, %xmm0
137 }
138
Daniel Dunbar3b709d52012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000139In this case, we're testing that we get the expected code generation with
140both 32-bit and 64-bit code generation.
141
Daniel Dunbar3b709d52012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000142The "CHECK-NEXT:" directive
143~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
144
Daniel Dunbar3b709d52012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000145Sometimes you want to match lines and would like to verify that matches
146happen on exactly consecutive lines with no other lines in between them. In
Dmitri Gribenko0fab1912012-11-14 19:42:32 +0000147this case, you can use "``CHECK:``" and "``CHECK-NEXT:``" directives to specify
148this. If you specified a custom check prefix, just use "``<PREFIX>-NEXT:``".
149For example, something like this works as you'd expect:
Daniel Dunbar3b709d52012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000150
Dmitri Gribenko0d887a02012-06-12 15:45:07 +0000151.. code-block:: llvm
Daniel Dunbar3b709d52012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000152
Dmitri Gribenko32f9bca2012-06-12 00:48:47 +0000153 define void @t2(<2 x double>* %r, <2 x double>* %A, double %B) {
154 %tmp3 = load <2 x double>* %A, align 16
155 %tmp7 = insertelement <2 x double> undef, double %B, i32 0
156 %tmp9 = shufflevector <2 x double> %tmp3,
157 <2 x double> %tmp7,
158 <2 x i32> < i32 0, i32 2 >
159 store <2 x double> %tmp9, <2 x double>* %r, align 16
Daniel Dunbar3b709d52012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000160 ret void
161
162 ; CHECK: t2:
163 ; CHECK: movl 8(%esp), %eax
164 ; CHECK-NEXT: movapd (%eax), %xmm0
165 ; CHECK-NEXT: movhpd 12(%esp), %xmm0
166 ; CHECK-NEXT: movl 4(%esp), %eax
167 ; CHECK-NEXT: movapd %xmm0, (%eax)
168 ; CHECK-NEXT: ret
169 }
170
Dmitri Gribenko0fab1912012-11-14 19:42:32 +0000171"``CHECK-NEXT:``" directives reject the input unless there is exactly one
Eli Bendersky17ced452012-11-21 22:40:52 +0000172newline between it and the previous directive. A "``CHECK-NEXT:``" cannot be
Dmitri Gribenko0fab1912012-11-14 19:42:32 +0000173the first directive in a file.
Daniel Dunbar3b709d52012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000174
175The "CHECK-NOT:" directive
176~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
177
Dmitri Gribenko0fab1912012-11-14 19:42:32 +0000178The "``CHECK-NOT:``" directive is used to verify that a string doesn't occur
Daniel Dunbar3b709d52012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000179between two matches (or before the first match, or after the last match). For
180example, to verify that a load is removed by a transformation, a test like this
181can be used:
182
Dmitri Gribenko0d887a02012-06-12 15:45:07 +0000183.. code-block:: llvm
Daniel Dunbar3b709d52012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000184
185 define i8 @coerce_offset0(i32 %V, i32* %P) {
186 store i32 %V, i32* %P
187
188 %P2 = bitcast i32* %P to i8*
189 %P3 = getelementptr i8* %P2, i32 2
190
191 %A = load i8* %P3
192 ret i8 %A
193 ; CHECK: @coerce_offset0
194 ; CHECK-NOT: load
195 ; CHECK: ret i8
196 }
197
Michael Liao95ab3262013-05-14 20:34:12 +0000198The "CHECK-DAG:" directive
199~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
200
201If it's necessary to match strings that don't occur in a strictly sequential
202order, "``CHECK-DAG:``" could be used to verify them between two matches (or
203before the first match, or after the last match). For example, clang emits
204vtable globals in reverse order. Using ``CHECK-DAG:``, we can keep the checks
205in the natural order:
206
207.. code-block:: c++
208
209 // RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -emit-llvm -o - | FileCheck %s
210
211 struct Foo { virtual void method(); };
212 Foo f; // emit vtable
213 // CHECK-DAG: @_ZTV3Foo =
214
215 struct Bar { virtual void method(); };
216 Bar b;
217 // CHECK-DAG: @_ZTV3Bar =
218
Renato Golinf02062f2013-10-11 18:50:22 +0000219``CHECK-NOT:`` directives could be mixed with ``CHECK-DAG:`` directives to
220exclude strings between the surrounding ``CHECK-DAG:`` directives. As a result,
221the surrounding ``CHECK-DAG:`` directives cannot be reordered, i.e. all
222occurrences matching ``CHECK-DAG:`` before ``CHECK-NOT:`` must not fall behind
223occurrences matching ``CHECK-DAG:`` after ``CHECK-NOT:``. For example,
224
225.. code-block:: llvm
226
227 ; CHECK-DAG: BEFORE
228 ; CHECK-NOT: NOT
229 ; CHECK-DAG: AFTER
230
231This case will reject input strings where ``BEFORE`` occurs after ``AFTER``.
Michael Liao95ab3262013-05-14 20:34:12 +0000232
233With captured variables, ``CHECK-DAG:`` is able to match valid topological
234orderings of a DAG with edges from the definition of a variable to its use.
235It's useful, e.g., when your test cases need to match different output
236sequences from the instruction scheduler. For example,
237
238.. code-block:: llvm
239
240 ; CHECK-DAG: add [[REG1:r[0-9]+]], r1, r2
241 ; CHECK-DAG: add [[REG2:r[0-9]+]], r3, r4
242 ; CHECK: mul r5, [[REG1]], [[REG2]]
243
244In this case, any order of that two ``add`` instructions will be allowed.
245
Renato Golinf02062f2013-10-11 18:50:22 +0000246If you are defining `and` using variables in the same ``CHECK-DAG:`` block,
247be aware that the definition rule can match `after` its use.
248
249So, for instance, the code below will pass:
Michael Liao95ab3262013-05-14 20:34:12 +0000250
251.. code-block:: llvm
252
Renato Golinf02062f2013-10-11 18:50:22 +0000253 ; CHECK-DAG: vmov.32 [[REG2:d[0-9]+]][0]
254 ; CHECK-DAG: vmov.32 [[REG2]][1]
255 vmov.32 d0[1]
256 vmov.32 d0[0]
Michael Liao95ab3262013-05-14 20:34:12 +0000257
Renato Golinf02062f2013-10-11 18:50:22 +0000258While this other code, will not:
259
260.. code-block:: llvm
261
262 ; CHECK-DAG: vmov.32 [[REG2:d[0-9]+]][0]
263 ; CHECK-DAG: vmov.32 [[REG2]][1]
264 vmov.32 d1[1]
265 vmov.32 d0[0]
266
267While this can be very useful, it's also dangerous, because in the case of
268register sequence, you must have a strong order (read before write, copy before
269use, etc). If the definition your test is looking for doesn't match (because
270of a bug in the compiler), it may match further away from the use, and mask
271real bugs away.
272
273In those cases, to enforce the order, use a non-DAG directive between DAG-blocks.
Michael Liao95ab3262013-05-14 20:34:12 +0000274
Stephen Lin178504b2013-07-12 14:51:05 +0000275The "CHECK-LABEL:" directive
Bill Wendlingd6a721b2013-07-30 08:26:24 +0000276~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Stephen Lin178504b2013-07-12 14:51:05 +0000277
278Sometimes in a file containing multiple tests divided into logical blocks, one
279or more ``CHECK:`` directives may inadvertently succeed by matching lines in a
280later block. While an error will usually eventually be generated, the check
281flagged as causing the error may not actually bear any relationship to the
282actual source of the problem.
283
284In order to produce better error messages in these cases, the "``CHECK-LABEL:``"
285directive can be used. It is treated identically to a normal ``CHECK``
Stephen Lind6392062013-07-18 23:26:58 +0000286directive except that FileCheck makes an additional assumption that a line
287matched by the directive cannot also be matched by any other check present in
288``match-filename``; this is intended to be used for lines containing labels or
289other unique identifiers. Conceptually, the presence of ``CHECK-LABEL`` divides
290the input stream into separate blocks, each of which is processed independently,
291preventing a ``CHECK:`` directive in one block matching a line in another block.
292For example,
Stephen Lin178504b2013-07-12 14:51:05 +0000293
294.. code-block:: llvm
295
296 define %struct.C* @C_ctor_base(%struct.C* %this, i32 %x) {
297 entry:
298 ; CHECK-LABEL: C_ctor_base:
299 ; CHECK: mov [[SAVETHIS:r[0-9]+]], r0
300 ; CHECK: bl A_ctor_base
301 ; CHECK: mov r0, [[SAVETHIS]]
302 %0 = bitcast %struct.C* %this to %struct.A*
303 %call = tail call %struct.A* @A_ctor_base(%struct.A* %0)
304 %1 = bitcast %struct.C* %this to %struct.B*
305 %call2 = tail call %struct.B* @B_ctor_base(%struct.B* %1, i32 %x)
306 ret %struct.C* %this
307 }
308
309 define %struct.D* @D_ctor_base(%struct.D* %this, i32 %x) {
310 entry:
311 ; CHECK-LABEL: D_ctor_base:
312
313The use of ``CHECK-LABEL:`` directives in this case ensures that the three
314``CHECK:`` directives only accept lines corresponding to the body of the
315``@C_ctor_base`` function, even if the patterns match lines found later in
Stephen Lind6392062013-07-18 23:26:58 +0000316the file. Furthermore, if one of these three ``CHECK:`` directives fail,
317FileCheck will recover by continuing to the next block, allowing multiple test
318failures to be detected in a single invocation.
Stephen Lin178504b2013-07-12 14:51:05 +0000319
320There is no requirement that ``CHECK-LABEL:`` directives contain strings that
321correspond to actual syntactic labels in a source or output language: they must
322simply uniquely match a single line in the file being verified.
323
324``CHECK-LABEL:`` directives cannot contain variable definitions or uses.
325
Daniel Dunbar3b709d52012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000326FileCheck Pattern Matching Syntax
327~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
328
Dmitri Gribenko0fab1912012-11-14 19:42:32 +0000329The "``CHECK:``" and "``CHECK-NOT:``" directives both take a pattern to match.
330For most uses of FileCheck, fixed string matching is perfectly sufficient. For
331some things, a more flexible form of matching is desired. To support this,
332FileCheck allows you to specify regular expressions in matching strings,
333surrounded by double braces: ``{{yourregex}}``. Because we want to use fixed
334string matching for a majority of what we do, FileCheck has been designed to
335support mixing and matching fixed string matching with regular expressions.
336This allows you to write things like this:
Daniel Dunbar3b709d52012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000337
Dmitri Gribenko0d887a02012-06-12 15:45:07 +0000338.. code-block:: llvm
Daniel Dunbar3b709d52012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000339
340 ; CHECK: movhpd {{[0-9]+}}(%esp), {{%xmm[0-7]}}
341
Daniel Dunbar3b709d52012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000342In this case, any offset from the ESP register will be allowed, and any xmm
343register will be allowed.
344
345Because regular expressions are enclosed with double braces, they are
346visually distinct, and you don't need to use escape characters within the double
347braces like you would in C. In the rare case that you want to match double
348braces explicitly from the input, you can use something ugly like
Dmitri Gribenko0fab1912012-11-14 19:42:32 +0000349``{{[{][{]}}`` as your pattern.
Daniel Dunbar3b709d52012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000350
351FileCheck Variables
352~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
353
Daniel Dunbar3b709d52012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000354It is often useful to match a pattern and then verify that it occurs again
355later in the file. For codegen tests, this can be useful to allow any register,
Eli Benderskyed04fd22012-12-01 22:03:57 +0000356but verify that that register is used consistently later. To do this,
357:program:`FileCheck` allows named variables to be defined and substituted into
358patterns. Here is a simple example:
Daniel Dunbar3b709d52012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000359
Dmitri Gribenko0d887a02012-06-12 15:45:07 +0000360.. code-block:: llvm
Daniel Dunbar3b709d52012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000361
362 ; CHECK: test5:
363 ; CHECK: notw [[REGISTER:%[a-z]+]]
Chad Rosierd6d05e32012-05-24 21:17:47 +0000364 ; CHECK: andw {{.*}}[[REGISTER]]
Daniel Dunbar3b709d52012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000365
Dmitri Gribenko0fab1912012-11-14 19:42:32 +0000366The first check line matches a regex ``%[a-z]+`` and captures it into the
367variable ``REGISTER``. The second line verifies that whatever is in
Eli Benderskyed04fd22012-12-01 22:03:57 +0000368``REGISTER`` occurs later in the file after an "``andw``". :program:`FileCheck`
369variable references are always contained in ``[[ ]]`` pairs, and their names can
370be formed with the regex ``[a-zA-Z][a-zA-Z0-9]*``. If a colon follows the name,
Dmitri Gribenko0fab1912012-11-14 19:42:32 +0000371then it is a definition of the variable; otherwise, it is a use.
Daniel Dunbar3b709d52012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000372
Eli Benderskyed04fd22012-12-01 22:03:57 +0000373:program:`FileCheck` variables can be defined multiple times, and uses always
374get the latest value. Variables can also be used later on the same line they
375were defined on. For example:
376
377.. code-block:: llvm
378
379 ; CHECK: op [[REG:r[0-9]+]], [[REG]]
380
381Can be useful if you want the operands of ``op`` to be the same register,
382and don't care exactly which register it is.
Dmitri Gribenko0fab1912012-11-14 19:42:32 +0000383
Alexander Kornienko70a870a2012-11-14 21:07:37 +0000384FileCheck Expressions
385~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
386
Dmitri Gribenkoc8c3dbd2012-11-29 19:21:02 +0000387Sometimes there's a need to verify output which refers line numbers of the
388match file, e.g. when testing compiler diagnostics. This introduces a certain
389fragility of the match file structure, as "``CHECK:``" lines contain absolute
390line numbers in the same file, which have to be updated whenever line numbers
391change due to text addition or deletion.
Alexander Kornienko70a870a2012-11-14 21:07:37 +0000392
393To support this case, FileCheck allows using ``[[@LINE]]``,
394``[[@LINE+<offset>]]``, ``[[@LINE-<offset>]]`` expressions in patterns. These
395expressions expand to a number of the line where a pattern is located (with an
396optional integer offset).
397
398This way match patterns can be put near the relevant test lines and include
399relative line number references, for example:
400
401.. code-block:: c++
402
403 // CHECK: test.cpp:[[@LINE+4]]:6: error: expected ';' after top level declarator
404 // CHECK-NEXT: {{^int a}}
405 // CHECK-NEXT: {{^ \^}}
406 // CHECK-NEXT: {{^ ;}}
407 int a
408