blob: 0864285ef6ac89d5be354ad799579f7af083f4df [file] [log] [blame]
Kinson Chika8fa74c2011-07-29 11:33:41 -07001solaris 2.5.1 usparc 167mhz?? - SC4.0 cc -fast -Xa -xO5
2
3For the ultra sparc, SunC 4.0 cc -fast -Xa -xO5, running 'des_opts'
4gives a speed of 475,000 des/s while 'speed' gives 417,000 des/s.
5I believe the difference is tied up in optimisation that the compiler
6is able to perform when the code is 'inlined'. For 'speed', the DES
7routines are being linked from a library. I'll record the higher
8speed since if performance is everything, you can always inline
9'des_enc.c'.
10
11[ 16-Jan-06 - I've been playing with the
12 '-xtarget=ultra -xarch=v8plus -Xa -xO5 -Xa'
13 and while it makes the des_opts numbers much slower, it makes the
14 actual 'speed' numbers look better which is a realistic version of
15 using the libraries. ]
16
17options des ecb/s
1816 r1 p 475516.90 100.0%
1916 r2 p 439388.10 92.4%
2016 c i 427001.40 89.8%
2116 c p 419516.50 88.2%
22 4 r2 p 409491.70 86.1%
23 4 r1 p 404266.90 85.0%
24 4 c p 398121.00 83.7%
25 4 c i 370588.40 77.9%
26 4 r1 i 362742.20 76.3%
2716 r2 i 331275.50 69.7%
2816 r1 i 324730.60 68.3%
29 4 r2 i 63535.10 13.4% <-- very very weird, must be cache problems.
30-DDES_UNROLL -DDES_RISC1 -DDES_PTR
31