| PINCTRL (PIN CONTROL) subsystem |
| This document outlines the pin control subsystem in Linux |
| |
| This subsystem deals with: |
| |
| - Enumerating and naming controllable pins |
| |
| - Multiplexing of pins, pads, fingers (etc) see below for details |
| |
| - Configuration of pins, pads, fingers (etc), such as software-controlled |
| biasing and driving mode specific pins, such as pull-up/down, open drain, |
| load capacitance etc. |
| |
| Top-level interface |
| =================== |
| |
| Definition of PIN CONTROLLER: |
| |
| - A pin controller is a piece of hardware, usually a set of registers, that |
| can control PINs. It may be able to multiplex, bias, set load capacitance, |
| set drive strength, etc. for individual pins or groups of pins. |
| |
| Definition of PIN: |
| |
| - PINS are equal to pads, fingers, balls or whatever packaging input or |
| output line you want to control and these are denoted by unsigned integers |
| in the range 0..maxpin. This numberspace is local to each PIN CONTROLLER, so |
| there may be several such number spaces in a system. This pin space may |
| be sparse - i.e. there may be gaps in the space with numbers where no |
| pin exists. |
| |
| When a PIN CONTROLLER is instantiated, it will register a descriptor to the |
| pin control framework, and this descriptor contains an array of pin descriptors |
| describing the pins handled by this specific pin controller. |
| |
| Here is an example of a PGA (Pin Grid Array) chip seen from underneath: |
| |
| A B C D E F G H |
| |
| 8 o o o o o o o o |
| |
| 7 o o o o o o o o |
| |
| 6 o o o o o o o o |
| |
| 5 o o o o o o o o |
| |
| 4 o o o o o o o o |
| |
| 3 o o o o o o o o |
| |
| 2 o o o o o o o o |
| |
| 1 o o o o o o o o |
| |
| To register a pin controller and name all the pins on this package we can do |
| this in our driver: |
| |
| #include <linux/pinctrl/pinctrl.h> |
| |
| const struct pinctrl_pin_desc foo_pins[] = { |
| PINCTRL_PIN(0, "A8"), |
| PINCTRL_PIN(1, "B8"), |
| PINCTRL_PIN(2, "C8"), |
| ... |
| PINCTRL_PIN(61, "F1"), |
| PINCTRL_PIN(62, "G1"), |
| PINCTRL_PIN(63, "H1"), |
| }; |
| |
| static struct pinctrl_desc foo_desc = { |
| .name = "foo", |
| .pins = foo_pins, |
| .npins = ARRAY_SIZE(foo_pins), |
| .owner = THIS_MODULE, |
| }; |
| |
| int __init foo_probe(void) |
| { |
| struct pinctrl_dev *pctl; |
| |
| pctl = pinctrl_register(&foo_desc, <PARENT>, NULL); |
| if (!pctl) |
| pr_err("could not register foo pin driver\n"); |
| } |
| |
| To enable the pinctrl subsystem and the subgroups for PINMUX and PINCONF and |
| selected drivers, you need to select them from your machine's Kconfig entry, |
| since these are so tightly integrated with the machines they are used on. |
| See for example arch/arm/mach-u300/Kconfig for an example. |
| |
| Pins usually have fancier names than this. You can find these in the datasheet |
| for your chip. Notice that the core pinctrl.h file provides a fancy macro |
| called PINCTRL_PIN() to create the struct entries. As you can see I enumerated |
| the pins from 0 in the upper left corner to 63 in the lower right corner. |
| This enumeration was arbitrarily chosen, in practice you need to think |
| through your numbering system so that it matches the layout of registers |
| and such things in your driver, or the code may become complicated. You must |
| also consider matching of offsets to the GPIO ranges that may be handled by |
| the pin controller. |
| |
| For a padring with 467 pads, as opposed to actual pins, I used an enumeration |
| like this, walking around the edge of the chip, which seems to be industry |
| standard too (all these pads had names, too): |
| |
| |
| 0 ..... 104 |
| 466 105 |
| . . |
| . . |
| 358 224 |
| 357 .... 225 |
| |
| |
| Pin groups |
| ========== |
| |
| Many controllers need to deal with groups of pins, so the pin controller |
| subsystem has a mechanism for enumerating groups of pins and retrieving the |
| actual enumerated pins that are part of a certain group. |
| |
| For example, say that we have a group of pins dealing with an SPI interface |
| on { 0, 8, 16, 24 }, and a group of pins dealing with an I2C interface on pins |
| on { 24, 25 }. |
| |
| These two groups are presented to the pin control subsystem by implementing |
| some generic pinctrl_ops like this: |
| |
| #include <linux/pinctrl/pinctrl.h> |
| |
| struct foo_group { |
| const char *name; |
| const unsigned int *pins; |
| const unsigned num_pins; |
| }; |
| |
| static const unsigned int spi0_pins[] = { 0, 8, 16, 24 }; |
| static const unsigned int i2c0_pins[] = { 24, 25 }; |
| |
| static const struct foo_group foo_groups[] = { |
| { |
| .name = "spi0_grp", |
| .pins = spi0_pins, |
| .num_pins = ARRAY_SIZE(spi0_pins), |
| }, |
| { |
| .name = "i2c0_grp", |
| .pins = i2c0_pins, |
| .num_pins = ARRAY_SIZE(i2c0_pins), |
| }, |
| }; |
| |
| |
| static int foo_get_groups_count(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev) |
| { |
| return ARRAY_SIZE(foo_groups); |
| } |
| |
| static const char *foo_get_group_name(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, |
| unsigned selector) |
| { |
| return foo_groups[selector].name; |
| } |
| |
| static int foo_get_group_pins(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, unsigned selector, |
| const unsigned **pins, |
| unsigned *num_pins) |
| { |
| *pins = (unsigned *) foo_groups[selector].pins; |
| *num_pins = foo_groups[selector].num_pins; |
| return 0; |
| } |
| |
| static struct pinctrl_ops foo_pctrl_ops = { |
| .get_groups_count = foo_get_groups_count, |
| .get_group_name = foo_get_group_name, |
| .get_group_pins = foo_get_group_pins, |
| }; |
| |
| |
| static struct pinctrl_desc foo_desc = { |
| ... |
| .pctlops = &foo_pctrl_ops, |
| }; |
| |
| The pin control subsystem will call the .get_groups_count() function to |
| determine the total number of legal selectors, then it will call the other functions |
| to retrieve the name and pins of the group. Maintaining the data structure of |
| the groups is up to the driver, this is just a simple example - in practice you |
| may need more entries in your group structure, for example specific register |
| ranges associated with each group and so on. |
| |
| |
| Pin configuration |
| ================= |
| |
| Pins can sometimes be software-configured in various ways, mostly related |
| to their electronic properties when used as inputs or outputs. For example you |
| may be able to make an output pin high impedance, or "tristate" meaning it is |
| effectively disconnected. You may be able to connect an input pin to VDD or GND |
| using a certain resistor value - pull up and pull down - so that the pin has a |
| stable value when nothing is driving the rail it is connected to, or when it's |
| unconnected. |
| |
| Pin configuration can be programmed by adding configuration entries into the |
| mapping table; see section "Board/machine configuration" below. |
| |
| The format and meaning of the configuration parameter, PLATFORM_X_PULL_UP |
| above, is entirely defined by the pin controller driver. |
| |
| The pin configuration driver implements callbacks for changing pin |
| configuration in the pin controller ops like this: |
| |
| #include <linux/pinctrl/pinctrl.h> |
| #include <linux/pinctrl/pinconf.h> |
| #include "platform_x_pindefs.h" |
| |
| static int foo_pin_config_get(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, |
| unsigned offset, |
| unsigned long *config) |
| { |
| struct my_conftype conf; |
| |
| ... Find setting for pin @ offset ... |
| |
| *config = (unsigned long) conf; |
| } |
| |
| static int foo_pin_config_set(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, |
| unsigned offset, |
| unsigned long config) |
| { |
| struct my_conftype *conf = (struct my_conftype *) config; |
| |
| switch (conf) { |
| case PLATFORM_X_PULL_UP: |
| ... |
| } |
| } |
| } |
| |
| static int foo_pin_config_group_get (struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, |
| unsigned selector, |
| unsigned long *config) |
| { |
| ... |
| } |
| |
| static int foo_pin_config_group_set (struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, |
| unsigned selector, |
| unsigned long config) |
| { |
| ... |
| } |
| |
| static struct pinconf_ops foo_pconf_ops = { |
| .pin_config_get = foo_pin_config_get, |
| .pin_config_set = foo_pin_config_set, |
| .pin_config_group_get = foo_pin_config_group_get, |
| .pin_config_group_set = foo_pin_config_group_set, |
| }; |
| |
| /* Pin config operations are handled by some pin controller */ |
| static struct pinctrl_desc foo_desc = { |
| ... |
| .confops = &foo_pconf_ops, |
| }; |
| |
| Since some controllers have special logic for handling entire groups of pins |
| they can exploit the special whole-group pin control function. The |
| pin_config_group_set() callback is allowed to return the error code -EAGAIN, |
| for groups it does not want to handle, or if it just wants to do some |
| group-level handling and then fall through to iterate over all pins, in which |
| case each individual pin will be treated by separate pin_config_set() calls as |
| well. |
| |
| |
| Interaction with the GPIO subsystem |
| =================================== |
| |
| The GPIO drivers may want to perform operations of various types on the same |
| physical pins that are also registered as pin controller pins. |
| |
| First and foremost, the two subsystems can be used as completely orthogonal, |
| see the section named "pin control requests from drivers" and |
| "drivers needing both pin control and GPIOs" below for details. But in some |
| situations a cross-subsystem mapping between pins and GPIOs is needed. |
| |
| Since the pin controller subsystem have its pinspace local to the pin |
| controller we need a mapping so that the pin control subsystem can figure out |
| which pin controller handles control of a certain GPIO pin. Since a single |
| pin controller may be muxing several GPIO ranges (typically SoCs that have |
| one set of pins, but internally several GPIO silicon blocks, each modelled as |
| a struct gpio_chip) any number of GPIO ranges can be added to a pin controller |
| instance like this: |
| |
| struct gpio_chip chip_a; |
| struct gpio_chip chip_b; |
| |
| static struct pinctrl_gpio_range gpio_range_a = { |
| .name = "chip a", |
| .id = 0, |
| .base = 32, |
| .pin_base = 32, |
| .npins = 16, |
| .gc = &chip_a; |
| }; |
| |
| static struct pinctrl_gpio_range gpio_range_b = { |
| .name = "chip b", |
| .id = 0, |
| .base = 48, |
| .pin_base = 64, |
| .npins = 8, |
| .gc = &chip_b; |
| }; |
| |
| { |
| struct pinctrl_dev *pctl; |
| ... |
| pinctrl_add_gpio_range(pctl, &gpio_range_a); |
| pinctrl_add_gpio_range(pctl, &gpio_range_b); |
| } |
| |
| So this complex system has one pin controller handling two different |
| GPIO chips. "chip a" has 16 pins and "chip b" has 8 pins. The "chip a" and |
| "chip b" have different .pin_base, which means a start pin number of the |
| GPIO range. |
| |
| The GPIO range of "chip a" starts from the GPIO base of 32 and actual |
| pin range also starts from 32. However "chip b" has different starting |
| offset for the GPIO range and pin range. The GPIO range of "chip b" starts |
| from GPIO number 48, while the pin range of "chip b" starts from 64. |
| |
| We can convert a gpio number to actual pin number using this "pin_base". |
| They are mapped in the global GPIO pin space at: |
| |
| chip a: |
| - GPIO range : [32 .. 47] |
| - pin range : [32 .. 47] |
| chip b: |
| - GPIO range : [48 .. 55] |
| - pin range : [64 .. 71] |
| |
| The above examples assume the mapping between the GPIOs and pins is |
| linear. If the mapping is sparse or haphazard, an array of arbitrary pin |
| numbers can be encoded in the range like this: |
| |
| static const unsigned range_pins[] = { 14, 1, 22, 17, 10, 8, 6, 2 }; |
| |
| static struct pinctrl_gpio_range gpio_range = { |
| .name = "chip", |
| .id = 0, |
| .base = 32, |
| .pins = &range_pins, |
| .npins = ARRAY_SIZE(range_pins), |
| .gc = &chip; |
| }; |
| |
| In this case the pin_base property will be ignored. If the name of a pin |
| group is known, the pins and npins elements of the above structure can be |
| initialised using the function pinctrl_get_group_pins(), e.g. for pin |
| group "foo": |
| |
| pinctrl_get_group_pins(pctl, "foo", &gpio_range.pins, &gpio_range.npins); |
| |
| When GPIO-specific functions in the pin control subsystem are called, these |
| ranges will be used to look up the appropriate pin controller by inspecting |
| and matching the pin to the pin ranges across all controllers. When a |
| pin controller handling the matching range is found, GPIO-specific functions |
| will be called on that specific pin controller. |
| |
| For all functionalities dealing with pin biasing, pin muxing etc, the pin |
| controller subsystem will look up the corresponding pin number from the passed |
| in gpio number, and use the range's internals to retrieve a pin number. After |
| that, the subsystem passes it on to the pin control driver, so the driver |
| will get a pin number into its handled number range. Further it is also passed |
| the range ID value, so that the pin controller knows which range it should |
| deal with. |
| |
| Calling pinctrl_add_gpio_range from pinctrl driver is DEPRECATED. Please see |
| section 2.1 of Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio.txt on how to bind |
| pinctrl and gpio drivers. |
| |
| |
| PINMUX interfaces |
| ================= |
| |
| These calls use the pinmux_* naming prefix. No other calls should use that |
| prefix. |
| |
| |
| What is pinmuxing? |
| ================== |
| |
| PINMUX, also known as padmux, ballmux, alternate functions or mission modes |
| is a way for chip vendors producing some kind of electrical packages to use |
| a certain physical pin (ball, pad, finger, etc) for multiple mutually exclusive |
| functions, depending on the application. By "application" in this context |
| we usually mean a way of soldering or wiring the package into an electronic |
| system, even though the framework makes it possible to also change the function |
| at runtime. |
| |
| Here is an example of a PGA (Pin Grid Array) chip seen from underneath: |
| |
| A B C D E F G H |
| +---+ |
| 8 | o | o o o o o o o |
| | | |
| 7 | o | o o o o o o o |
| | | |
| 6 | o | o o o o o o o |
| +---+---+ |
| 5 | o | o | o o o o o o |
| +---+---+ +---+ |
| 4 o o o o o o | o | o |
| | | |
| 3 o o o o o o | o | o |
| | | |
| 2 o o o o o o | o | o |
| +-------+-------+-------+---+---+ |
| 1 | o o | o o | o o | o | o | |
| +-------+-------+-------+---+---+ |
| |
| This is not tetris. The game to think of is chess. Not all PGA/BGA packages |
| are chessboard-like, big ones have "holes" in some arrangement according to |
| different design patterns, but we're using this as a simple example. Of the |
| pins you see some will be taken by things like a few VCC and GND to feed power |
| to the chip, and quite a few will be taken by large ports like an external |
| memory interface. The remaining pins will often be subject to pin multiplexing. |
| |
| The example 8x8 PGA package above will have pin numbers 0 through 63 assigned |
| to its physical pins. It will name the pins { A1, A2, A3 ... H6, H7, H8 } using |
| pinctrl_register_pins() and a suitable data set as shown earlier. |
| |
| In this 8x8 BGA package the pins { A8, A7, A6, A5 } can be used as an SPI port |
| (these are four pins: CLK, RXD, TXD, FRM). In that case, pin B5 can be used as |
| some general-purpose GPIO pin. However, in another setting, pins { A5, B5 } can |
| be used as an I2C port (these are just two pins: SCL, SDA). Needless to say, |
| we cannot use the SPI port and I2C port at the same time. However in the inside |
| of the package the silicon performing the SPI logic can alternatively be routed |
| out on pins { G4, G3, G2, G1 }. |
| |
| On the bottom row at { A1, B1, C1, D1, E1, F1, G1, H1 } we have something |
| special - it's an external MMC bus that can be 2, 4 or 8 bits wide, and it will |
| consume 2, 4 or 8 pins respectively, so either { A1, B1 } are taken or |
| { A1, B1, C1, D1 } or all of them. If we use all 8 bits, we cannot use the SPI |
| port on pins { G4, G3, G2, G1 } of course. |
| |
| This way the silicon blocks present inside the chip can be multiplexed "muxed" |
| out on different pin ranges. Often contemporary SoC (systems on chip) will |
| contain several I2C, SPI, SDIO/MMC, etc silicon blocks that can be routed to |
| different pins by pinmux settings. |
| |
| Since general-purpose I/O pins (GPIO) are typically always in shortage, it is |
| common to be able to use almost any pin as a GPIO pin if it is not currently |
| in use by some other I/O port. |
| |
| |
| Pinmux conventions |
| ================== |
| |
| The purpose of the pinmux functionality in the pin controller subsystem is to |
| abstract and provide pinmux settings to the devices you choose to instantiate |
| in your machine configuration. It is inspired by the clk, GPIO and regulator |
| subsystems, so devices will request their mux setting, but it's also possible |
| to request a single pin for e.g. GPIO. |
| |
| Definitions: |
| |
| - FUNCTIONS can be switched in and out by a driver residing with the pin |
| control subsystem in the drivers/pinctrl/* directory of the kernel. The |
| pin control driver knows the possible functions. In the example above you can |
| identify three pinmux functions, one for spi, one for i2c and one for mmc. |
| |
| - FUNCTIONS are assumed to be enumerable from zero in a one-dimensional array. |
| In this case the array could be something like: { spi0, i2c0, mmc0 } |
| for the three available functions. |
| |
| - FUNCTIONS have PIN GROUPS as defined on the generic level - so a certain |
| function is *always* associated with a certain set of pin groups, could |
| be just a single one, but could also be many. In the example above the |
| function i2c is associated with the pins { A5, B5 }, enumerated as |
| { 24, 25 } in the controller pin space. |
| |
| The Function spi is associated with pin groups { A8, A7, A6, A5 } |
| and { G4, G3, G2, G1 }, which are enumerated as { 0, 8, 16, 24 } and |
| { 38, 46, 54, 62 } respectively. |
| |
| Group names must be unique per pin controller, no two groups on the same |
| controller may have the same name. |
| |
| - The combination of a FUNCTION and a PIN GROUP determine a certain function |
| for a certain set of pins. The knowledge of the functions and pin groups |
| and their machine-specific particulars are kept inside the pinmux driver, |
| from the outside only the enumerators are known, and the driver core can: |
| |
| - Request the name of a function with a certain selector (>= 0) |
| - A list of groups associated with a certain function |
| - Request that a certain group in that list to be activated for a certain |
| function |
| |
| As already described above, pin groups are in turn self-descriptive, so |
| the core will retrieve the actual pin range in a certain group from the |
| driver. |
| |
| - FUNCTIONS and GROUPS on a certain PIN CONTROLLER are MAPPED to a certain |
| device by the board file, device tree or similar machine setup configuration |
| mechanism, similar to how regulators are connected to devices, usually by |
| name. Defining a pin controller, function and group thus uniquely identify |
| the set of pins to be used by a certain device. (If only one possible group |
| of pins is available for the function, no group name need to be supplied - |
| the core will simply select the first and only group available.) |
| |
| In the example case we can define that this particular machine shall |
| use device spi0 with pinmux function fspi0 group gspi0 and i2c0 on function |
| fi2c0 group gi2c0, on the primary pin controller, we get mappings |
| like these: |
| |
| { |
| {"map-spi0", spi0, pinctrl0, fspi0, gspi0}, |
| {"map-i2c0", i2c0, pinctrl0, fi2c0, gi2c0} |
| } |
| |
| Every map must be assigned a state name, pin controller, device and |
| function. The group is not compulsory - if it is omitted the first group |
| presented by the driver as applicable for the function will be selected, |
| which is useful for simple cases. |
| |
| It is possible to map several groups to the same combination of device, |
| pin controller and function. This is for cases where a certain function on |
| a certain pin controller may use different sets of pins in different |
| configurations. |
| |
| - PINS for a certain FUNCTION using a certain PIN GROUP on a certain |
| PIN CONTROLLER are provided on a first-come first-serve basis, so if some |
| other device mux setting or GPIO pin request has already taken your physical |
| pin, you will be denied the use of it. To get (activate) a new setting, the |
| old one has to be put (deactivated) first. |
| |
| Sometimes the documentation and hardware registers will be oriented around |
| pads (or "fingers") rather than pins - these are the soldering surfaces on the |
| silicon inside the package, and may or may not match the actual number of |
| pins/balls underneath the capsule. Pick some enumeration that makes sense to |
| you. Define enumerators only for the pins you can control if that makes sense. |
| |
| Assumptions: |
| |
| We assume that the number of possible function maps to pin groups is limited by |
| the hardware. I.e. we assume that there is no system where any function can be |
| mapped to any pin, like in a phone exchange. So the available pin groups for |
| a certain function will be limited to a few choices (say up to eight or so), |
| not hundreds or any amount of choices. This is the characteristic we have found |
| by inspecting available pinmux hardware, and a necessary assumption since we |
| expect pinmux drivers to present *all* possible function vs pin group mappings |
| to the subsystem. |
| |
| |
| Pinmux drivers |
| ============== |
| |
| The pinmux core takes care of preventing conflicts on pins and calling |
| the pin controller driver to execute different settings. |
| |
| It is the responsibility of the pinmux driver to impose further restrictions |
| (say for example infer electronic limitations due to load, etc.) to determine |
| whether or not the requested function can actually be allowed, and in case it |
| is possible to perform the requested mux setting, poke the hardware so that |
| this happens. |
| |
| Pinmux drivers are required to supply a few callback functions, some are |
| optional. Usually the set_mux() function is implemented, writing values into |
| some certain registers to activate a certain mux setting for a certain pin. |
| |
| A simple driver for the above example will work by setting bits 0, 1, 2, 3 or 4 |
| into some register named MUX to select a certain function with a certain |
| group of pins would work something like this: |
| |
| #include <linux/pinctrl/pinctrl.h> |
| #include <linux/pinctrl/pinmux.h> |
| |
| struct foo_group { |
| const char *name; |
| const unsigned int *pins; |
| const unsigned num_pins; |
| }; |
| |
| static const unsigned spi0_0_pins[] = { 0, 8, 16, 24 }; |
| static const unsigned spi0_1_pins[] = { 38, 46, 54, 62 }; |
| static const unsigned i2c0_pins[] = { 24, 25 }; |
| static const unsigned mmc0_1_pins[] = { 56, 57 }; |
| static const unsigned mmc0_2_pins[] = { 58, 59 }; |
| static const unsigned mmc0_3_pins[] = { 60, 61, 62, 63 }; |
| |
| static const struct foo_group foo_groups[] = { |
| { |
| .name = "spi0_0_grp", |
| .pins = spi0_0_pins, |
| .num_pins = ARRAY_SIZE(spi0_0_pins), |
| }, |
| { |
| .name = "spi0_1_grp", |
| .pins = spi0_1_pins, |
| .num_pins = ARRAY_SIZE(spi0_1_pins), |
| }, |
| { |
| .name = "i2c0_grp", |
| .pins = i2c0_pins, |
| .num_pins = ARRAY_SIZE(i2c0_pins), |
| }, |
| { |
| .name = "mmc0_1_grp", |
| .pins = mmc0_1_pins, |
| .num_pins = ARRAY_SIZE(mmc0_1_pins), |
| }, |
| { |
| .name = "mmc0_2_grp", |
| .pins = mmc0_2_pins, |
| .num_pins = ARRAY_SIZE(mmc0_2_pins), |
| }, |
| { |
| .name = "mmc0_3_grp", |
| .pins = mmc0_3_pins, |
| .num_pins = ARRAY_SIZE(mmc0_3_pins), |
| }, |
| }; |
| |
| |
| static int foo_get_groups_count(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev) |
| { |
| return ARRAY_SIZE(foo_groups); |
| } |
| |
| static const char *foo_get_group_name(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, |
| unsigned selector) |
| { |
| return foo_groups[selector].name; |
| } |
| |
| static int foo_get_group_pins(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, unsigned selector, |
| unsigned ** const pins, |
| unsigned * const num_pins) |
| { |
| *pins = (unsigned *) foo_groups[selector].pins; |
| *num_pins = foo_groups[selector].num_pins; |
| return 0; |
| } |
| |
| static struct pinctrl_ops foo_pctrl_ops = { |
| .get_groups_count = foo_get_groups_count, |
| .get_group_name = foo_get_group_name, |
| .get_group_pins = foo_get_group_pins, |
| }; |
| |
| struct foo_pmx_func { |
| const char *name; |
| const char * const *groups; |
| const unsigned num_groups; |
| }; |
| |
| static const char * const spi0_groups[] = { "spi0_0_grp", "spi0_1_grp" }; |
| static const char * const i2c0_groups[] = { "i2c0_grp" }; |
| static const char * const mmc0_groups[] = { "mmc0_1_grp", "mmc0_2_grp", |
| "mmc0_3_grp" }; |
| |
| static const struct foo_pmx_func foo_functions[] = { |
| { |
| .name = "spi0", |
| .groups = spi0_groups, |
| .num_groups = ARRAY_SIZE(spi0_groups), |
| }, |
| { |
| .name = "i2c0", |
| .groups = i2c0_groups, |
| .num_groups = ARRAY_SIZE(i2c0_groups), |
| }, |
| { |
| .name = "mmc0", |
| .groups = mmc0_groups, |
| .num_groups = ARRAY_SIZE(mmc0_groups), |
| }, |
| }; |
| |
| static int foo_get_functions_count(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev) |
| { |
| return ARRAY_SIZE(foo_functions); |
| } |
| |
| static const char *foo_get_fname(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, unsigned selector) |
| { |
| return foo_functions[selector].name; |
| } |
| |
| static int foo_get_groups(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, unsigned selector, |
| const char * const **groups, |
| unsigned * const num_groups) |
| { |
| *groups = foo_functions[selector].groups; |
| *num_groups = foo_functions[selector].num_groups; |
| return 0; |
| } |
| |
| static int foo_set_mux(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, unsigned selector, |
| unsigned group) |
| { |
| u8 regbit = (1 << selector + group); |
| |
| writeb((readb(MUX)|regbit), MUX) |
| return 0; |
| } |
| |
| static struct pinmux_ops foo_pmxops = { |
| .get_functions_count = foo_get_functions_count, |
| .get_function_name = foo_get_fname, |
| .get_function_groups = foo_get_groups, |
| .set_mux = foo_set_mux, |
| }; |
| |
| /* Pinmux operations are handled by some pin controller */ |
| static struct pinctrl_desc foo_desc = { |
| ... |
| .pctlops = &foo_pctrl_ops, |
| .pmxops = &foo_pmxops, |
| }; |
| |
| In the example activating muxing 0 and 1 at the same time setting bits |
| 0 and 1, uses one pin in common so they would collide. |
| |
| The beauty of the pinmux subsystem is that since it keeps track of all |
| pins and who is using them, it will already have denied an impossible |
| request like that, so the driver does not need to worry about such |
| things - when it gets a selector passed in, the pinmux subsystem makes |
| sure no other device or GPIO assignment is already using the selected |
| pins. Thus bits 0 and 1 in the control register will never be set at the |
| same time. |
| |
| All the above functions are mandatory to implement for a pinmux driver. |
| |
| |
| Pin control interaction with the GPIO subsystem |
| =============================================== |
| |
| Note that the following implies that the use case is to use a certain pin |
| from the Linux kernel using the API in <linux/gpio.h> with gpio_request() |
| and similar functions. There are cases where you may be using something |
| that your datasheet calls "GPIO mode", but actually is just an electrical |
| configuration for a certain device. See the section below named |
| "GPIO mode pitfalls" for more details on this scenario. |
| |
| The public pinmux API contains two functions named pinctrl_request_gpio() |
| and pinctrl_free_gpio(). These two functions shall *ONLY* be called from |
| gpiolib-based drivers as part of their gpio_request() and |
| gpio_free() semantics. Likewise the pinctrl_gpio_direction_[input|output] |
| shall only be called from within respective gpio_direction_[input|output] |
| gpiolib implementation. |
| |
| NOTE that platforms and individual drivers shall *NOT* request GPIO pins to be |
| controlled e.g. muxed in. Instead, implement a proper gpiolib driver and have |
| that driver request proper muxing and other control for its pins. |
| |
| The function list could become long, especially if you can convert every |
| individual pin into a GPIO pin independent of any other pins, and then try |
| the approach to define every pin as a function. |
| |
| In this case, the function array would become 64 entries for each GPIO |
| setting and then the device functions. |
| |
| For this reason there are two functions a pin control driver can implement |
| to enable only GPIO on an individual pin: .gpio_request_enable() and |
| .gpio_disable_free(). |
| |
| This function will pass in the affected GPIO range identified by the pin |
| controller core, so you know which GPIO pins are being affected by the request |
| operation. |
| |
| If your driver needs to have an indication from the framework of whether the |
| GPIO pin shall be used for input or output you can implement the |
| .gpio_set_direction() function. As described this shall be called from the |
| gpiolib driver and the affected GPIO range, pin offset and desired direction |
| will be passed along to this function. |
| |
| Alternatively to using these special functions, it is fully allowed to use |
| named functions for each GPIO pin, the pinctrl_request_gpio() will attempt to |
| obtain the function "gpioN" where "N" is the global GPIO pin number if no |
| special GPIO-handler is registered. |
| |
| |
| GPIO mode pitfalls |
| ================== |
| |
| Due to the naming conventions used by hardware engineers, where "GPIO" |
| is taken to mean different things than what the kernel does, the developer |
| may be confused by a datasheet talking about a pin being possible to set |
| into "GPIO mode". It appears that what hardware engineers mean with |
| "GPIO mode" is not necessarily the use case that is implied in the kernel |
| interface <linux/gpio.h>: a pin that you grab from kernel code and then |
| either listen for input or drive high/low to assert/deassert some |
| external line. |
| |
| Rather hardware engineers think that "GPIO mode" means that you can |
| software-control a few electrical properties of the pin that you would |
| not be able to control if the pin was in some other mode, such as muxed in |
| for a device. |
| |
| The GPIO portions of a pin and its relation to a certain pin controller |
| configuration and muxing logic can be constructed in several ways. Here |
| are two examples: |
| |
| (A) |
| pin config |
| logic regs |
| | +- SPI |
| Physical pins --- pad --- pinmux -+- I2C |
| | +- mmc |
| | +- GPIO |
| pin |
| multiplex |
| logic regs |
| |
| Here some electrical properties of the pin can be configured no matter |
| whether the pin is used for GPIO or not. If you multiplex a GPIO onto a |
| pin, you can also drive it high/low from "GPIO" registers. |
| Alternatively, the pin can be controlled by a certain peripheral, while |
| still applying desired pin config properties. GPIO functionality is thus |
| orthogonal to any other device using the pin. |
| |
| In this arrangement the registers for the GPIO portions of the pin controller, |
| or the registers for the GPIO hardware module are likely to reside in a |
| separate memory range only intended for GPIO driving, and the register |
| range dealing with pin config and pin multiplexing get placed into a |
| different memory range and a separate section of the data sheet. |
| |
| (B) |
| |
| pin config |
| logic regs |
| | +- SPI |
| Physical pins --- pad --- pinmux -+- I2C |
| | | +- mmc |
| | | |
| GPIO pin |
| multiplex |
| logic regs |
| |
| In this arrangement, the GPIO functionality can always be enabled, such that |
| e.g. a GPIO input can be used to "spy" on the SPI/I2C/MMC signal while it is |
| pulsed out. It is likely possible to disrupt the traffic on the pin by doing |
| wrong things on the GPIO block, as it is never really disconnected. It is |
| possible that the GPIO, pin config and pin multiplex registers are placed into |
| the same memory range and the same section of the data sheet, although that |
| need not be the case. |
| |
| From a kernel point of view, however, these are different aspects of the |
| hardware and shall be put into different subsystems: |
| |
| - Registers (or fields within registers) that control electrical |
| properties of the pin such as biasing and drive strength should be |
| exposed through the pinctrl subsystem, as "pin configuration" settings. |
| |
| - Registers (or fields within registers) that control muxing of signals |
| from various other HW blocks (e.g. I2C, MMC, or GPIO) onto pins should |
| be exposed through the pinctrl subsystem, as mux functions. |
| |
| - Registers (or fields within registers) that control GPIO functionality |
| such as setting a GPIO's output value, reading a GPIO's input value, or |
| setting GPIO pin direction should be exposed through the GPIO subsystem, |
| and if they also support interrupt capabilities, through the irqchip |
| abstraction. |
| |
| Depending on the exact HW register design, some functions exposed by the |
| GPIO subsystem may call into the pinctrl subsystem in order to |
| co-ordinate register settings across HW modules. In particular, this may |
| be needed for HW with separate GPIO and pin controller HW modules, where |
| e.g. GPIO direction is determined by a register in the pin controller HW |
| module rather than the GPIO HW module. |
| |
| Electrical properties of the pin such as biasing and drive strength |
| may be placed at some pin-specific register in all cases or as part |
| of the GPIO register in case (B) especially. This doesn't mean that such |
| properties necessarily pertain to what the Linux kernel calls "GPIO". |
| |
| Example: a pin is usually muxed in to be used as a UART TX line. But during |
| system sleep, we need to put this pin into "GPIO mode" and ground it. |
| |
| If you make a 1-to-1 map to the GPIO subsystem for this pin, you may start |
| to think that you need to come up with something really complex, that the |
| pin shall be used for UART TX and GPIO at the same time, that you will grab |
| a pin control handle and set it to a certain state to enable UART TX to be |
| muxed in, then twist it over to GPIO mode and use gpio_direction_output() |
| to drive it low during sleep, then mux it over to UART TX again when you |
| wake up and maybe even gpio_request/gpio_free as part of this cycle. This |
| all gets very complicated. |
| |
| The solution is to not think that what the datasheet calls "GPIO mode" |
| has to be handled by the <linux/gpio.h> interface. Instead view this as |
| a certain pin config setting. Look in e.g. <linux/pinctrl/pinconf-generic.h> |
| and you find this in the documentation: |
| |
| PIN_CONFIG_OUTPUT: this will configure the pin in output, use argument |
| 1 to indicate high level, argument 0 to indicate low level. |
| |
| So it is perfectly possible to push a pin into "GPIO mode" and drive the |
| line low as part of the usual pin control map. So for example your UART |
| driver may look like this: |
| |
| #include <linux/pinctrl/consumer.h> |
| |
| struct pinctrl *pinctrl; |
| struct pinctrl_state *pins_default; |
| struct pinctrl_state *pins_sleep; |
| |
| pins_default = pinctrl_lookup_state(uap->pinctrl, PINCTRL_STATE_DEFAULT); |
| pins_sleep = pinctrl_lookup_state(uap->pinctrl, PINCTRL_STATE_SLEEP); |
| |
| /* Normal mode */ |
| retval = pinctrl_select_state(pinctrl, pins_default); |
| /* Sleep mode */ |
| retval = pinctrl_select_state(pinctrl, pins_sleep); |
| |
| And your machine configuration may look like this: |
| -------------------------------------------------- |
| |
| static unsigned long uart_default_mode[] = { |
| PIN_CONF_PACKED(PIN_CONFIG_DRIVE_PUSH_PULL, 0), |
| }; |
| |
| static unsigned long uart_sleep_mode[] = { |
| PIN_CONF_PACKED(PIN_CONFIG_OUTPUT, 0), |
| }; |
| |
| static struct pinctrl_map pinmap[] __initdata = { |
| PIN_MAP_MUX_GROUP("uart", PINCTRL_STATE_DEFAULT, "pinctrl-foo", |
| "u0_group", "u0"), |
| PIN_MAP_CONFIGS_PIN("uart", PINCTRL_STATE_DEFAULT, "pinctrl-foo", |
| "UART_TX_PIN", uart_default_mode), |
| PIN_MAP_MUX_GROUP("uart", PINCTRL_STATE_SLEEP, "pinctrl-foo", |
| "u0_group", "gpio-mode"), |
| PIN_MAP_CONFIGS_PIN("uart", PINCTRL_STATE_SLEEP, "pinctrl-foo", |
| "UART_TX_PIN", uart_sleep_mode), |
| }; |
| |
| foo_init(void) { |
| pinctrl_register_mappings(pinmap, ARRAY_SIZE(pinmap)); |
| } |
| |
| Here the pins we want to control are in the "u0_group" and there is some |
| function called "u0" that can be enabled on this group of pins, and then |
| everything is UART business as usual. But there is also some function |
| named "gpio-mode" that can be mapped onto the same pins to move them into |
| GPIO mode. |
| |
| This will give the desired effect without any bogus interaction with the |
| GPIO subsystem. It is just an electrical configuration used by that device |
| when going to sleep, it might imply that the pin is set into something the |
| datasheet calls "GPIO mode", but that is not the point: it is still used |
| by that UART device to control the pins that pertain to that very UART |
| driver, putting them into modes needed by the UART. GPIO in the Linux |
| kernel sense are just some 1-bit line, and is a different use case. |
| |
| How the registers are poked to attain the push or pull, and output low |
| configuration and the muxing of the "u0" or "gpio-mode" group onto these |
| pins is a question for the driver. |
| |
| Some datasheets will be more helpful and refer to the "GPIO mode" as |
| "low power mode" rather than anything to do with GPIO. This often means |
| the same thing electrically speaking, but in this latter case the |
| software engineers will usually quickly identify that this is some |
| specific muxing or configuration rather than anything related to the GPIO |
| API. |
| |
| |
| Board/machine configuration |
| ================================== |
| |
| Boards and machines define how a certain complete running system is put |
| together, including how GPIOs and devices are muxed, how regulators are |
| constrained and how the clock tree looks. Of course pinmux settings are also |
| part of this. |
| |
| A pin controller configuration for a machine looks pretty much like a simple |
| regulator configuration, so for the example array above we want to enable i2c |
| and spi on the second function mapping: |
| |
| #include <linux/pinctrl/machine.h> |
| |
| static const struct pinctrl_map mapping[] __initconst = { |
| { |
| .dev_name = "foo-spi.0", |
| .name = PINCTRL_STATE_DEFAULT, |
| .type = PIN_MAP_TYPE_MUX_GROUP, |
| .ctrl_dev_name = "pinctrl-foo", |
| .data.mux.function = "spi0", |
| }, |
| { |
| .dev_name = "foo-i2c.0", |
| .name = PINCTRL_STATE_DEFAULT, |
| .type = PIN_MAP_TYPE_MUX_GROUP, |
| .ctrl_dev_name = "pinctrl-foo", |
| .data.mux.function = "i2c0", |
| }, |
| { |
| .dev_name = "foo-mmc.0", |
| .name = PINCTRL_STATE_DEFAULT, |
| .type = PIN_MAP_TYPE_MUX_GROUP, |
| .ctrl_dev_name = "pinctrl-foo", |
| .data.mux.function = "mmc0", |
| }, |
| }; |
| |
| The dev_name here matches to the unique device name that can be used to look |
| up the device struct (just like with clockdev or regulators). The function name |
| must match a function provided by the pinmux driver handling this pin range. |
| |
| As you can see we may have several pin controllers on the system and thus |
| we need to specify which one of them contains the functions we wish to map. |
| |
| You register this pinmux mapping to the pinmux subsystem by simply: |
| |
| ret = pinctrl_register_mappings(mapping, ARRAY_SIZE(mapping)); |
| |
| Since the above construct is pretty common there is a helper macro to make |
| it even more compact which assumes you want to use pinctrl-foo and position |
| 0 for mapping, for example: |
| |
| static struct pinctrl_map mapping[] __initdata = { |
| PIN_MAP_MUX_GROUP("foo-i2c.o", PINCTRL_STATE_DEFAULT, "pinctrl-foo", NULL, "i2c0"), |
| }; |
| |
| The mapping table may also contain pin configuration entries. It's common for |
| each pin/group to have a number of configuration entries that affect it, so |
| the table entries for configuration reference an array of config parameters |
| and values. An example using the convenience macros is shown below: |
| |
| static unsigned long i2c_grp_configs[] = { |
| FOO_PIN_DRIVEN, |
| FOO_PIN_PULLUP, |
| }; |
| |
| static unsigned long i2c_pin_configs[] = { |
| FOO_OPEN_COLLECTOR, |
| FOO_SLEW_RATE_SLOW, |
| }; |
| |
| static struct pinctrl_map mapping[] __initdata = { |
| PIN_MAP_MUX_GROUP("foo-i2c.0", PINCTRL_STATE_DEFAULT, "pinctrl-foo", "i2c0", "i2c0"), |
| PIN_MAP_CONFIGS_GROUP("foo-i2c.0", PINCTRL_STATE_DEFAULT, "pinctrl-foo", "i2c0", i2c_grp_configs), |
| PIN_MAP_CONFIGS_PIN("foo-i2c.0", PINCTRL_STATE_DEFAULT, "pinctrl-foo", "i2c0scl", i2c_pin_configs), |
| PIN_MAP_CONFIGS_PIN("foo-i2c.0", PINCTRL_STATE_DEFAULT, "pinctrl-foo", "i2c0sda", i2c_pin_configs), |
| }; |
| |
| Finally, some devices expect the mapping table to contain certain specific |
| named states. When running on hardware that doesn't need any pin controller |
| configuration, the mapping table must still contain those named states, in |
| order to explicitly indicate that the states were provided and intended to |
| be empty. Table entry macro PIN_MAP_DUMMY_STATE serves the purpose of defining |
| a named state without causing any pin controller to be programmed: |
| |
| static struct pinctrl_map mapping[] __initdata = { |
| PIN_MAP_DUMMY_STATE("foo-i2c.0", PINCTRL_STATE_DEFAULT), |
| }; |
| |
| |
| Complex mappings |
| ================ |
| |
| As it is possible to map a function to different groups of pins an optional |
| .group can be specified like this: |
| |
| ... |
| { |
| .dev_name = "foo-spi.0", |
| .name = "spi0-pos-A", |
| .type = PIN_MAP_TYPE_MUX_GROUP, |
| .ctrl_dev_name = "pinctrl-foo", |
| .function = "spi0", |
| .group = "spi0_0_grp", |
| }, |
| { |
| .dev_name = "foo-spi.0", |
| .name = "spi0-pos-B", |
| .type = PIN_MAP_TYPE_MUX_GROUP, |
| .ctrl_dev_name = "pinctrl-foo", |
| .function = "spi0", |
| .group = "spi0_1_grp", |
| }, |
| ... |
| |
| This example mapping is used to switch between two positions for spi0 at |
| runtime, as described further below under the heading "Runtime pinmuxing". |
| |
| Further it is possible for one named state to affect the muxing of several |
| groups of pins, say for example in the mmc0 example above, where you can |
| additively expand the mmc0 bus from 2 to 4 to 8 pins. If we want to use all |
| three groups for a total of 2+2+4 = 8 pins (for an 8-bit MMC bus as is the |
| case), we define a mapping like this: |
| |
| ... |
| { |
| .dev_name = "foo-mmc.0", |
| .name = "2bit" |
| .type = PIN_MAP_TYPE_MUX_GROUP, |
| .ctrl_dev_name = "pinctrl-foo", |
| .function = "mmc0", |
| .group = "mmc0_1_grp", |
| }, |
| { |
| .dev_name = "foo-mmc.0", |
| .name = "4bit" |
| .type = PIN_MAP_TYPE_MUX_GROUP, |
| .ctrl_dev_name = "pinctrl-foo", |
| .function = "mmc0", |
| .group = "mmc0_1_grp", |
| }, |
| { |
| .dev_name = "foo-mmc.0", |
| .name = "4bit" |
| .type = PIN_MAP_TYPE_MUX_GROUP, |
| .ctrl_dev_name = "pinctrl-foo", |
| .function = "mmc0", |
| .group = "mmc0_2_grp", |
| }, |
| { |
| .dev_name = "foo-mmc.0", |
| .name = "8bit" |
| .type = PIN_MAP_TYPE_MUX_GROUP, |
| .ctrl_dev_name = "pinctrl-foo", |
| .function = "mmc0", |
| .group = "mmc0_1_grp", |
| }, |
| { |
| .dev_name = "foo-mmc.0", |
| .name = "8bit" |
| .type = PIN_MAP_TYPE_MUX_GROUP, |
| .ctrl_dev_name = "pinctrl-foo", |
| .function = "mmc0", |
| .group = "mmc0_2_grp", |
| }, |
| { |
| .dev_name = "foo-mmc.0", |
| .name = "8bit" |
| .type = PIN_MAP_TYPE_MUX_GROUP, |
| .ctrl_dev_name = "pinctrl-foo", |
| .function = "mmc0", |
| .group = "mmc0_3_grp", |
| }, |
| ... |
| |
| The result of grabbing this mapping from the device with something like |
| this (see next paragraph): |
| |
| p = devm_pinctrl_get(dev); |
| s = pinctrl_lookup_state(p, "8bit"); |
| ret = pinctrl_select_state(p, s); |
| |
| or more simply: |
| |
| p = devm_pinctrl_get_select(dev, "8bit"); |
| |
| Will be that you activate all the three bottom records in the mapping at |
| once. Since they share the same name, pin controller device, function and |
| device, and since we allow multiple groups to match to a single device, they |
| all get selected, and they all get enabled and disable simultaneously by the |
| pinmux core. |
| |
| |
| Pin control requests from drivers |
| ================================= |
| |
| When a device driver is about to probe the device core will automatically |
| attempt to issue pinctrl_get_select_default() on these devices. |
| This way driver writers do not need to add any of the boilerplate code |
| of the type found below. However when doing fine-grained state selection |
| and not using the "default" state, you may have to do some device driver |
| handling of the pinctrl handles and states. |
| |
| So if you just want to put the pins for a certain device into the default |
| state and be done with it, there is nothing you need to do besides |
| providing the proper mapping table. The device core will take care of |
| the rest. |
| |
| Generally it is discouraged to let individual drivers get and enable pin |
| control. So if possible, handle the pin control in platform code or some other |
| place where you have access to all the affected struct device * pointers. In |
| some cases where a driver needs to e.g. switch between different mux mappings |
| at runtime this is not possible. |
| |
| A typical case is if a driver needs to switch bias of pins from normal |
| operation and going to sleep, moving from the PINCTRL_STATE_DEFAULT to |
| PINCTRL_STATE_SLEEP at runtime, re-biasing or even re-muxing pins to save |
| current in sleep mode. |
| |
| A driver may request a certain control state to be activated, usually just the |
| default state like this: |
| |
| #include <linux/pinctrl/consumer.h> |
| |
| struct foo_state { |
| struct pinctrl *p; |
| struct pinctrl_state *s; |
| ... |
| }; |
| |
| foo_probe() |
| { |
| /* Allocate a state holder named "foo" etc */ |
| struct foo_state *foo = ...; |
| |
| foo->p = devm_pinctrl_get(&device); |
| if (IS_ERR(foo->p)) { |
| /* FIXME: clean up "foo" here */ |
| return PTR_ERR(foo->p); |
| } |
| |
| foo->s = pinctrl_lookup_state(foo->p, PINCTRL_STATE_DEFAULT); |
| if (IS_ERR(foo->s)) { |
| /* FIXME: clean up "foo" here */ |
| return PTR_ERR(s); |
| } |
| |
| ret = pinctrl_select_state(foo->s); |
| if (ret < 0) { |
| /* FIXME: clean up "foo" here */ |
| return ret; |
| } |
| } |
| |
| This get/lookup/select/put sequence can just as well be handled by bus drivers |
| if you don't want each and every driver to handle it and you know the |
| arrangement on your bus. |
| |
| The semantics of the pinctrl APIs are: |
| |
| - pinctrl_get() is called in process context to obtain a handle to all pinctrl |
| information for a given client device. It will allocate a struct from the |
| kernel memory to hold the pinmux state. All mapping table parsing or similar |
| slow operations take place within this API. |
| |
| - devm_pinctrl_get() is a variant of pinctrl_get() that causes pinctrl_put() |
| to be called automatically on the retrieved pointer when the associated |
| device is removed. It is recommended to use this function over plain |
| pinctrl_get(). |
| |
| - pinctrl_lookup_state() is called in process context to obtain a handle to a |
| specific state for a client device. This operation may be slow, too. |
| |
| - pinctrl_select_state() programs pin controller hardware according to the |
| definition of the state as given by the mapping table. In theory, this is a |
| fast-path operation, since it only involved blasting some register settings |
| into hardware. However, note that some pin controllers may have their |
| registers on a slow/IRQ-based bus, so client devices should not assume they |
| can call pinctrl_select_state() from non-blocking contexts. |
| |
| - pinctrl_put() frees all information associated with a pinctrl handle. |
| |
| - devm_pinctrl_put() is a variant of pinctrl_put() that may be used to |
| explicitly destroy a pinctrl object returned by devm_pinctrl_get(). |
| However, use of this function will be rare, due to the automatic cleanup |
| that will occur even without calling it. |
| |
| pinctrl_get() must be paired with a plain pinctrl_put(). |
| pinctrl_get() may not be paired with devm_pinctrl_put(). |
| devm_pinctrl_get() can optionally be paired with devm_pinctrl_put(). |
| devm_pinctrl_get() may not be paired with plain pinctrl_put(). |
| |
| Usually the pin control core handled the get/put pair and call out to the |
| device drivers bookkeeping operations, like checking available functions and |
| the associated pins, whereas select_state pass on to the pin controller |
| driver which takes care of activating and/or deactivating the mux setting by |
| quickly poking some registers. |
| |
| The pins are allocated for your device when you issue the devm_pinctrl_get() |
| call, after this you should be able to see this in the debugfs listing of all |
| pins. |
| |
| NOTE: the pinctrl system will return -EPROBE_DEFER if it cannot find the |
| requested pinctrl handles, for example if the pinctrl driver has not yet |
| registered. Thus make sure that the error path in your driver gracefully |
| cleans up and is ready to retry the probing later in the startup process. |
| |
| |
| Drivers needing both pin control and GPIOs |
| ========================================== |
| |
| Again, it is discouraged to let drivers lookup and select pin control states |
| themselves, but again sometimes this is unavoidable. |
| |
| So say that your driver is fetching its resources like this: |
| |
| #include <linux/pinctrl/consumer.h> |
| #include <linux/gpio.h> |
| |
| struct pinctrl *pinctrl; |
| int gpio; |
| |
| pinctrl = devm_pinctrl_get_select_default(&dev); |
| gpio = devm_gpio_request(&dev, 14, "foo"); |
| |
| Here we first request a certain pin state and then request GPIO 14 to be |
| used. If you're using the subsystems orthogonally like this, you should |
| nominally always get your pinctrl handle and select the desired pinctrl |
| state BEFORE requesting the GPIO. This is a semantic convention to avoid |
| situations that can be electrically unpleasant, you will certainly want to |
| mux in and bias pins in a certain way before the GPIO subsystems starts to |
| deal with them. |
| |
| The above can be hidden: using the device core, the pinctrl core may be |
| setting up the config and muxing for the pins right before the device is |
| probing, nevertheless orthogonal to the GPIO subsystem. |
| |
| But there are also situations where it makes sense for the GPIO subsystem |
| to communicate directly with the pinctrl subsystem, using the latter as a |
| back-end. This is when the GPIO driver may call out to the functions |
| described in the section "Pin control interaction with the GPIO subsystem" |
| above. This only involves per-pin multiplexing, and will be completely |
| hidden behind the gpio_*() function namespace. In this case, the driver |
| need not interact with the pin control subsystem at all. |
| |
| If a pin control driver and a GPIO driver is dealing with the same pins |
| and the use cases involve multiplexing, you MUST implement the pin controller |
| as a back-end for the GPIO driver like this, unless your hardware design |
| is such that the GPIO controller can override the pin controller's |
| multiplexing state through hardware without the need to interact with the |
| pin control system. |
| |
| |
| System pin control hogging |
| ========================== |
| |
| Pin control map entries can be hogged by the core when the pin controller |
| is registered. This means that the core will attempt to call pinctrl_get(), |
| lookup_state() and select_state() on it immediately after the pin control |
| device has been registered. |
| |
| This occurs for mapping table entries where the client device name is equal |
| to the pin controller device name, and the state name is PINCTRL_STATE_DEFAULT. |
| |
| { |
| .dev_name = "pinctrl-foo", |
| .name = PINCTRL_STATE_DEFAULT, |
| .type = PIN_MAP_TYPE_MUX_GROUP, |
| .ctrl_dev_name = "pinctrl-foo", |
| .function = "power_func", |
| }, |
| |
| Since it may be common to request the core to hog a few always-applicable |
| mux settings on the primary pin controller, there is a convenience macro for |
| this: |
| |
| PIN_MAP_MUX_GROUP_HOG_DEFAULT("pinctrl-foo", NULL /* group */, "power_func") |
| |
| This gives the exact same result as the above construction. |
| |
| |
| Runtime pinmuxing |
| ================= |
| |
| It is possible to mux a certain function in and out at runtime, say to move |
| an SPI port from one set of pins to another set of pins. Say for example for |
| spi0 in the example above, we expose two different groups of pins for the same |
| function, but with different named in the mapping as described under |
| "Advanced mapping" above. So that for an SPI device, we have two states named |
| "pos-A" and "pos-B". |
| |
| This snippet first initializes a state object for both groups (in foo_probe()), |
| then muxes the function in the pins defined by group A, and finally muxes it in |
| on the pins defined by group B: |
| |
| #include <linux/pinctrl/consumer.h> |
| |
| struct pinctrl *p; |
| struct pinctrl_state *s1, *s2; |
| |
| foo_probe() |
| { |
| /* Setup */ |
| p = devm_pinctrl_get(&device); |
| if (IS_ERR(p)) |
| ... |
| |
| s1 = pinctrl_lookup_state(foo->p, "pos-A"); |
| if (IS_ERR(s1)) |
| ... |
| |
| s2 = pinctrl_lookup_state(foo->p, "pos-B"); |
| if (IS_ERR(s2)) |
| ... |
| } |
| |
| foo_switch() |
| { |
| /* Enable on position A */ |
| ret = pinctrl_select_state(s1); |
| if (ret < 0) |
| ... |
| |
| ... |
| |
| /* Enable on position B */ |
| ret = pinctrl_select_state(s2); |
| if (ret < 0) |
| ... |
| |
| ... |
| } |
| |
| The above has to be done from process context. The reservation of the pins |
| will be done when the state is activated, so in effect one specific pin |
| can be used by different functions at different times on a running system. |