| Processor boosting control |
| |
| - information for users - |
| |
| Quick guide for the impatient: |
| -------------------- |
| /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/boost |
| controls the boost setting for the whole system. You can read and write |
| that file with either "0" (boosting disabled) or "1" (boosting allowed). |
| Reading or writing 1 does not mean that the system is boosting at this |
| very moment, but only that the CPU _may_ raise the frequency at it's |
| discretion. |
| -------------------- |
| |
| Introduction |
| ------------- |
| Some CPUs support a functionality to raise the operating frequency of |
| some cores in a multi-core package if certain conditions apply, mostly |
| if the whole chip is not fully utilized and below it's intended thermal |
| budget. This is done without operating system control by a combination |
| of hardware and firmware. |
| On Intel CPUs this is called "Turbo Boost", AMD calls it "Turbo-Core", |
| in technical documentation "Core performance boost". In Linux we use |
| the term "boost" for convenience. |
| |
| Rationale for disable switch |
| ---------------------------- |
| |
| Though the idea is to just give better performance without any user |
| intervention, sometimes the need arises to disable this functionality. |
| Most systems offer a switch in the (BIOS) firmware to disable the |
| functionality at all, but a more fine-grained and dynamic control would |
| be desirable: |
| 1. While running benchmarks, reproducible results are important. Since |
| the boosting functionality depends on the load of the whole package, |
| single thread performance can vary. By explicitly disabling the boost |
| functionality at least for the benchmark's run-time the system will run |
| at a fixed frequency and results are reproducible again. |
| 2. To examine the impact of the boosting functionality it is helpful |
| to do tests with and without boosting. |
| 3. Boosting means overclocking the processor, though under controlled |
| conditions. By raising the frequency and the voltage the processor |
| will consume more power than without the boosting, which may be |
| undesirable for instance for mobile users. Disabling boosting may |
| save power here, though this depends on the workload. |
| |
| |
| User controlled switch |
| ---------------------- |
| |
| To allow the user to toggle the boosting functionality, the acpi-cpufreq |
| driver exports a sysfs knob to disable it. There is a file: |
| /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/boost |
| which can either read "0" (boosting disabled) or "1" (boosting enabled). |
| Reading the file is always supported, even if the processor does not |
| support boosting. In this case the file will be read-only and always |
| reads as "0". Explicitly changing the permissions and writing to that |
| file anyway will return EINVAL. |
| |
| On supported CPUs one can write either a "0" or a "1" into this file. |
| This will either disable the boost functionality on all cores in the |
| whole system (0) or will allow the hardware to boost at will (1). |
| |
| Writing a "1" does not explicitly boost the system, but just allows the |
| CPU (and the firmware) to boost at their discretion. Some implementations |
| take external factors like the chip's temperature into account, so |
| boosting once does not necessarily mean that it will occur every time |
| even using the exact same software setup. |
| |
| |
| AMD legacy cpb switch |
| --------------------- |
| The AMD powernow-k8 driver used to support a very similar switch to |
| disable or enable the "Core Performance Boost" feature of some AMD CPUs. |
| This switch was instantiated in each CPU's cpufreq directory |
| (/sys/devices/system/cpu[0-9]*/cpufreq) and was called "cpb". |
| Though the per CPU existence hints at a more fine grained control, the |
| actual implementation only supported a system-global switch semantics, |
| which was simply reflected into each CPU's file. Writing a 0 or 1 into it |
| would pull the other CPUs to the same state. |
| For compatibility reasons this file and its behavior is still supported |
| on AMD CPUs, though it is now protected by a config switch |
| (X86_ACPI_CPUFREQ_CPB). On Intel CPUs this file will never be created, |
| even with the config option set. |
| This functionality is considered legacy and will be removed in some future |
| kernel version. |
| |
| More fine grained boosting control |
| ---------------------------------- |
| |
| Technically it is possible to switch the boosting functionality at least |
| on a per package basis, for some CPUs even per core. Currently the driver |
| does not support it, but this may be implemented in the future. |