| |
| Control Group v2 |
| |
| October, 2015 Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> |
| |
| This is the authoritative documentation on the design, interface and |
| conventions of cgroup v2. It describes all userland-visible aspects |
| of cgroup including core and specific controller behaviors. All |
| future changes must be reflected in this document. Documentation for |
| v1 is available under Documentation/cgroup-v1/. |
| |
| CONTENTS |
| |
| 1. Introduction |
| 1-1. Terminology |
| 1-2. What is cgroup? |
| 2. Basic Operations |
| 2-1. Mounting |
| 2-2. Organizing Processes |
| 2-3. [Un]populated Notification |
| 2-4. Controlling Controllers |
| 2-4-1. Enabling and Disabling |
| 2-4-2. Top-down Constraint |
| 2-4-3. No Internal Process Constraint |
| 2-5. Delegation |
| 2-5-1. Model of Delegation |
| 2-5-2. Delegation Containment |
| 2-6. Guidelines |
| 2-6-1. Organize Once and Control |
| 2-6-2. Avoid Name Collisions |
| 3. Resource Distribution Models |
| 3-1. Weights |
| 3-2. Limits |
| 3-3. Protections |
| 3-4. Allocations |
| 4. Interface Files |
| 4-1. Format |
| 4-2. Conventions |
| 4-3. Core Interface Files |
| 5. Controllers |
| 5-1. CPU |
| 5-1-1. CPU Interface Files |
| 5-2. Memory |
| 5-2-1. Memory Interface Files |
| 5-2-2. Usage Guidelines |
| 5-2-3. Memory Ownership |
| 5-3. IO |
| 5-3-1. IO Interface Files |
| 5-3-2. Writeback |
| P. Information on Kernel Programming |
| P-1. Filesystem Support for Writeback |
| D. Deprecated v1 Core Features |
| R. Issues with v1 and Rationales for v2 |
| R-1. Multiple Hierarchies |
| R-2. Thread Granularity |
| R-3. Competition Between Inner Nodes and Threads |
| R-4. Other Interface Issues |
| R-5. Controller Issues and Remedies |
| R-5-1. Memory |
| |
| |
| 1. Introduction |
| |
| 1-1. Terminology |
| |
| "cgroup" stands for "control group" and is never capitalized. The |
| singular form is used to designate the whole feature and also as a |
| qualifier as in "cgroup controllers". When explicitly referring to |
| multiple individual control groups, the plural form "cgroups" is used. |
| |
| |
| 1-2. What is cgroup? |
| |
| cgroup is a mechanism to organize processes hierarchically and |
| distribute system resources along the hierarchy in a controlled and |
| configurable manner. |
| |
| cgroup is largely composed of two parts - the core and controllers. |
| cgroup core is primarily responsible for hierarchically organizing |
| processes. A cgroup controller is usually responsible for |
| distributing a specific type of system resource along the hierarchy |
| although there are utility controllers which serve purposes other than |
| resource distribution. |
| |
| cgroups form a tree structure and every process in the system belongs |
| to one and only one cgroup. All threads of a process belong to the |
| same cgroup. On creation, all processes are put in the cgroup that |
| the parent process belongs to at the time. A process can be migrated |
| to another cgroup. Migration of a process doesn't affect already |
| existing descendant processes. |
| |
| Following certain structural constraints, controllers may be enabled or |
| disabled selectively on a cgroup. All controller behaviors are |
| hierarchical - if a controller is enabled on a cgroup, it affects all |
| processes which belong to the cgroups consisting the inclusive |
| sub-hierarchy of the cgroup. When a controller is enabled on a nested |
| cgroup, it always restricts the resource distribution further. The |
| restrictions set closer to the root in the hierarchy can not be |
| overridden from further away. |
| |
| |
| 2. Basic Operations |
| |
| 2-1. Mounting |
| |
| Unlike v1, cgroup v2 has only single hierarchy. The cgroup v2 |
| hierarchy can be mounted with the following mount command. |
| |
| # mount -t cgroup2 none $MOUNT_POINT |
| |
| cgroup2 filesystem has the magic number 0x63677270 ("cgrp"). All |
| controllers which support v2 and are not bound to a v1 hierarchy are |
| automatically bound to the v2 hierarchy and show up at the root. |
| Controllers which are not in active use in the v2 hierarchy can be |
| bound to other hierarchies. This allows mixing v2 hierarchy with the |
| legacy v1 multiple hierarchies in a fully backward compatible way. |
| |
| A controller can be moved across hierarchies only after the controller |
| is no longer referenced in its current hierarchy. Because per-cgroup |
| controller states are destroyed asynchronously and controllers may |
| have lingering references, a controller may not show up immediately on |
| the v2 hierarchy after the final umount of the previous hierarchy. |
| Similarly, a controller should be fully disabled to be moved out of |
| the unified hierarchy and it may take some time for the disabled |
| controller to become available for other hierarchies; furthermore, due |
| to inter-controller dependencies, other controllers may need to be |
| disabled too. |
| |
| While useful for development and manual configurations, moving |
| controllers dynamically between the v2 and other hierarchies is |
| strongly discouraged for production use. It is recommended to decide |
| the hierarchies and controller associations before starting using the |
| controllers after system boot. |
| |
| During transition to v2, system management software might still |
| automount the v1 cgroup filesystem and so hijack all controllers |
| during boot, before manual intervention is possible. To make testing |
| and experimenting easier, the kernel parameter cgroup_no_v1= allows |
| disabling controllers in v1 and make them always available in v2. |
| |
| |
| 2-2. Organizing Processes |
| |
| Initially, only the root cgroup exists to which all processes belong. |
| A child cgroup can be created by creating a sub-directory. |
| |
| # mkdir $CGROUP_NAME |
| |
| A given cgroup may have multiple child cgroups forming a tree |
| structure. Each cgroup has a read-writable interface file |
| "cgroup.procs". When read, it lists the PIDs of all processes which |
| belong to the cgroup one-per-line. The PIDs are not ordered and the |
| same PID may show up more than once if the process got moved to |
| another cgroup and then back or the PID got recycled while reading. |
| |
| A process can be migrated into a cgroup by writing its PID to the |
| target cgroup's "cgroup.procs" file. Only one process can be migrated |
| on a single write(2) call. If a process is composed of multiple |
| threads, writing the PID of any thread migrates all threads of the |
| process. |
| |
| When a process forks a child process, the new process is born into the |
| cgroup that the forking process belongs to at the time of the |
| operation. After exit, a process stays associated with the cgroup |
| that it belonged to at the time of exit until it's reaped; however, a |
| zombie process does not appear in "cgroup.procs" and thus can't be |
| moved to another cgroup. |
| |
| A cgroup which doesn't have any children or live processes can be |
| destroyed by removing the directory. Note that a cgroup which doesn't |
| have any children and is associated only with zombie processes is |
| considered empty and can be removed. |
| |
| # rmdir $CGROUP_NAME |
| |
| "/proc/$PID/cgroup" lists a process's cgroup membership. If legacy |
| cgroup is in use in the system, this file may contain multiple lines, |
| one for each hierarchy. The entry for cgroup v2 is always in the |
| format "0::$PATH". |
| |
| # cat /proc/842/cgroup |
| ... |
| 0::/test-cgroup/test-cgroup-nested |
| |
| If the process becomes a zombie and the cgroup it was associated with |
| is removed subsequently, " (deleted)" is appended to the path. |
| |
| # cat /proc/842/cgroup |
| ... |
| 0::/test-cgroup/test-cgroup-nested (deleted) |
| |
| |
| 2-3. [Un]populated Notification |
| |
| Each non-root cgroup has a "cgroup.events" file which contains |
| "populated" field indicating whether the cgroup's sub-hierarchy has |
| live processes in it. Its value is 0 if there is no live process in |
| the cgroup and its descendants; otherwise, 1. poll and [id]notify |
| events are triggered when the value changes. This can be used, for |
| example, to start a clean-up operation after all processes of a given |
| sub-hierarchy have exited. The populated state updates and |
| notifications are recursive. Consider the following sub-hierarchy |
| where the numbers in the parentheses represent the numbers of processes |
| in each cgroup. |
| |
| A(4) - B(0) - C(1) |
| \ D(0) |
| |
| A, B and C's "populated" fields would be 1 while D's 0. After the one |
| process in C exits, B and C's "populated" fields would flip to "0" and |
| file modified events will be generated on the "cgroup.events" files of |
| both cgroups. |
| |
| |
| 2-4. Controlling Controllers |
| |
| 2-4-1. Enabling and Disabling |
| |
| Each cgroup has a "cgroup.controllers" file which lists all |
| controllers available for the cgroup to enable. |
| |
| # cat cgroup.controllers |
| cpu io memory |
| |
| No controller is enabled by default. Controllers can be enabled and |
| disabled by writing to the "cgroup.subtree_control" file. |
| |
| # echo "+cpu +memory -io" > cgroup.subtree_control |
| |
| Only controllers which are listed in "cgroup.controllers" can be |
| enabled. When multiple operations are specified as above, either they |
| all succeed or fail. If multiple operations on the same controller |
| are specified, the last one is effective. |
| |
| Enabling a controller in a cgroup indicates that the distribution of |
| the target resource across its immediate children will be controlled. |
| Consider the following sub-hierarchy. The enabled controllers are |
| listed in parentheses. |
| |
| A(cpu,memory) - B(memory) - C() |
| \ D() |
| |
| As A has "cpu" and "memory" enabled, A will control the distribution |
| of CPU cycles and memory to its children, in this case, B. As B has |
| "memory" enabled but not "CPU", C and D will compete freely on CPU |
| cycles but their division of memory available to B will be controlled. |
| |
| As a controller regulates the distribution of the target resource to |
| the cgroup's children, enabling it creates the controller's interface |
| files in the child cgroups. In the above example, enabling "cpu" on B |
| would create the "cpu." prefixed controller interface files in C and |
| D. Likewise, disabling "memory" from B would remove the "memory." |
| prefixed controller interface files from C and D. This means that the |
| controller interface files - anything which doesn't start with |
| "cgroup." are owned by the parent rather than the cgroup itself. |
| |
| |
| 2-4-2. Top-down Constraint |
| |
| Resources are distributed top-down and a cgroup can further distribute |
| a resource only if the resource has been distributed to it from the |
| parent. This means that all non-root "cgroup.subtree_control" files |
| can only contain controllers which are enabled in the parent's |
| "cgroup.subtree_control" file. A controller can be enabled only if |
| the parent has the controller enabled and a controller can't be |
| disabled if one or more children have it enabled. |
| |
| |
| 2-4-3. No Internal Process Constraint |
| |
| Non-root cgroups can only distribute resources to their children when |
| they don't have any processes of their own. In other words, only |
| cgroups which don't contain any processes can have controllers enabled |
| in their "cgroup.subtree_control" files. |
| |
| This guarantees that, when a controller is looking at the part of the |
| hierarchy which has it enabled, processes are always only on the |
| leaves. This rules out situations where child cgroups compete against |
| internal processes of the parent. |
| |
| The root cgroup is exempt from this restriction. Root contains |
| processes and anonymous resource consumption which can't be associated |
| with any other cgroups and requires special treatment from most |
| controllers. How resource consumption in the root cgroup is governed |
| is up to each controller. |
| |
| Note that the restriction doesn't get in the way if there is no |
| enabled controller in the cgroup's "cgroup.subtree_control". This is |
| important as otherwise it wouldn't be possible to create children of a |
| populated cgroup. To control resource distribution of a cgroup, the |
| cgroup must create children and transfer all its processes to the |
| children before enabling controllers in its "cgroup.subtree_control" |
| file. |
| |
| |
| 2-5. Delegation |
| |
| 2-5-1. Model of Delegation |
| |
| A cgroup can be delegated to a less privileged user by granting write |
| access of the directory and its "cgroup.procs" file to the user. Note |
| that resource control interface files in a given directory control the |
| distribution of the parent's resources and thus must not be delegated |
| along with the directory. |
| |
| Once delegated, the user can build sub-hierarchy under the directory, |
| organize processes as it sees fit and further distribute the resources |
| it received from the parent. The limits and other settings of all |
| resource controllers are hierarchical and regardless of what happens |
| in the delegated sub-hierarchy, nothing can escape the resource |
| restrictions imposed by the parent. |
| |
| Currently, cgroup doesn't impose any restrictions on the number of |
| cgroups in or nesting depth of a delegated sub-hierarchy; however, |
| this may be limited explicitly in the future. |
| |
| |
| 2-5-2. Delegation Containment |
| |
| A delegated sub-hierarchy is contained in the sense that processes |
| can't be moved into or out of the sub-hierarchy by the delegatee. For |
| a process with a non-root euid to migrate a target process into a |
| cgroup by writing its PID to the "cgroup.procs" file, the following |
| conditions must be met. |
| |
| - The writer's euid must match either uid or suid of the target process. |
| |
| - The writer must have write access to the "cgroup.procs" file. |
| |
| - The writer must have write access to the "cgroup.procs" file of the |
| common ancestor of the source and destination cgroups. |
| |
| The above three constraints ensure that while a delegatee may migrate |
| processes around freely in the delegated sub-hierarchy it can't pull |
| in from or push out to outside the sub-hierarchy. |
| |
| For an example, let's assume cgroups C0 and C1 have been delegated to |
| user U0 who created C00, C01 under C0 and C10 under C1 as follows and |
| all processes under C0 and C1 belong to U0. |
| |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ - C0 - C00 |
| ~ cgroup ~ \ C01 |
| ~ hierarchy ~ |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ - C1 - C10 |
| |
| Let's also say U0 wants to write the PID of a process which is |
| currently in C10 into "C00/cgroup.procs". U0 has write access to the |
| file and uid match on the process; however, the common ancestor of the |
| source cgroup C10 and the destination cgroup C00 is above the points |
| of delegation and U0 would not have write access to its "cgroup.procs" |
| files and thus the write will be denied with -EACCES. |
| |
| |
| 2-6. Guidelines |
| |
| 2-6-1. Organize Once and Control |
| |
| Migrating a process across cgroups is a relatively expensive operation |
| and stateful resources such as memory are not moved together with the |
| process. This is an explicit design decision as there often exist |
| inherent trade-offs between migration and various hot paths in terms |
| of synchronization cost. |
| |
| As such, migrating processes across cgroups frequently as a means to |
| apply different resource restrictions is discouraged. A workload |
| should be assigned to a cgroup according to the system's logical and |
| resource structure once on start-up. Dynamic adjustments to resource |
| distribution can be made by changing controller configuration through |
| the interface files. |
| |
| |
| 2-6-2. Avoid Name Collisions |
| |
| Interface files for a cgroup and its children cgroups occupy the same |
| directory and it is possible to create children cgroups which collide |
| with interface files. |
| |
| All cgroup core interface files are prefixed with "cgroup." and each |
| controller's interface files are prefixed with the controller name and |
| a dot. A controller's name is composed of lower case alphabets and |
| '_'s but never begins with an '_' so it can be used as the prefix |
| character for collision avoidance. Also, interface file names won't |
| start or end with terms which are often used in categorizing workloads |
| such as job, service, slice, unit or workload. |
| |
| cgroup doesn't do anything to prevent name collisions and it's the |
| user's responsibility to avoid them. |
| |
| |
| 3. Resource Distribution Models |
| |
| cgroup controllers implement several resource distribution schemes |
| depending on the resource type and expected use cases. This section |
| describes major schemes in use along with their expected behaviors. |
| |
| |
| 3-1. Weights |
| |
| A parent's resource is distributed by adding up the weights of all |
| active children and giving each the fraction matching the ratio of its |
| weight against the sum. As only children which can make use of the |
| resource at the moment participate in the distribution, this is |
| work-conserving. Due to the dynamic nature, this model is usually |
| used for stateless resources. |
| |
| All weights are in the range [1, 10000] with the default at 100. This |
| allows symmetric multiplicative biases in both directions at fine |
| enough granularity while staying in the intuitive range. |
| |
| As long as the weight is in range, all configuration combinations are |
| valid and there is no reason to reject configuration changes or |
| process migrations. |
| |
| "cpu.weight" proportionally distributes CPU cycles to active children |
| and is an example of this type. |
| |
| |
| 3-2. Limits |
| |
| A child can only consume upto the configured amount of the resource. |
| Limits can be over-committed - the sum of the limits of children can |
| exceed the amount of resource available to the parent. |
| |
| Limits are in the range [0, max] and defaults to "max", which is noop. |
| |
| As limits can be over-committed, all configuration combinations are |
| valid and there is no reason to reject configuration changes or |
| process migrations. |
| |
| "io.max" limits the maximum BPS and/or IOPS that a cgroup can consume |
| on an IO device and is an example of this type. |
| |
| |
| 3-3. Protections |
| |
| A cgroup is protected to be allocated upto the configured amount of |
| the resource if the usages of all its ancestors are under their |
| protected levels. Protections can be hard guarantees or best effort |
| soft boundaries. Protections can also be over-committed in which case |
| only upto the amount available to the parent is protected among |
| children. |
| |
| Protections are in the range [0, max] and defaults to 0, which is |
| noop. |
| |
| As protections can be over-committed, all configuration combinations |
| are valid and there is no reason to reject configuration changes or |
| process migrations. |
| |
| "memory.low" implements best-effort memory protection and is an |
| example of this type. |
| |
| |
| 3-4. Allocations |
| |
| A cgroup is exclusively allocated a certain amount of a finite |
| resource. Allocations can't be over-committed - the sum of the |
| allocations of children can not exceed the amount of resource |
| available to the parent. |
| |
| Allocations are in the range [0, max] and defaults to 0, which is no |
| resource. |
| |
| As allocations can't be over-committed, some configuration |
| combinations are invalid and should be rejected. Also, if the |
| resource is mandatory for execution of processes, process migrations |
| may be rejected. |
| |
| "cpu.rt.max" hard-allocates realtime slices and is an example of this |
| type. |
| |
| |
| 4. Interface Files |
| |
| 4-1. Format |
| |
| All interface files should be in one of the following formats whenever |
| possible. |
| |
| New-line separated values |
| (when only one value can be written at once) |
| |
| VAL0\n |
| VAL1\n |
| ... |
| |
| Space separated values |
| (when read-only or multiple values can be written at once) |
| |
| VAL0 VAL1 ...\n |
| |
| Flat keyed |
| |
| KEY0 VAL0\n |
| KEY1 VAL1\n |
| ... |
| |
| Nested keyed |
| |
| KEY0 SUB_KEY0=VAL00 SUB_KEY1=VAL01... |
| KEY1 SUB_KEY0=VAL10 SUB_KEY1=VAL11... |
| ... |
| |
| For a writable file, the format for writing should generally match |
| reading; however, controllers may allow omitting later fields or |
| implement restricted shortcuts for most common use cases. |
| |
| For both flat and nested keyed files, only the values for a single key |
| can be written at a time. For nested keyed files, the sub key pairs |
| may be specified in any order and not all pairs have to be specified. |
| |
| |
| 4-2. Conventions |
| |
| - Settings for a single feature should be contained in a single file. |
| |
| - The root cgroup should be exempt from resource control and thus |
| shouldn't have resource control interface files. Also, |
| informational files on the root cgroup which end up showing global |
| information available elsewhere shouldn't exist. |
| |
| - If a controller implements weight based resource distribution, its |
| interface file should be named "weight" and have the range [1, |
| 10000] with 100 as the default. The values are chosen to allow |
| enough and symmetric bias in both directions while keeping it |
| intuitive (the default is 100%). |
| |
| - If a controller implements an absolute resource guarantee and/or |
| limit, the interface files should be named "min" and "max" |
| respectively. If a controller implements best effort resource |
| guarantee and/or limit, the interface files should be named "low" |
| and "high" respectively. |
| |
| In the above four control files, the special token "max" should be |
| used to represent upward infinity for both reading and writing. |
| |
| - If a setting has a configurable default value and keyed specific |
| overrides, the default entry should be keyed with "default" and |
| appear as the first entry in the file. |
| |
| The default value can be updated by writing either "default $VAL" or |
| "$VAL". |
| |
| When writing to update a specific override, "default" can be used as |
| the value to indicate removal of the override. Override entries |
| with "default" as the value must not appear when read. |
| |
| For example, a setting which is keyed by major:minor device numbers |
| with integer values may look like the following. |
| |
| # cat cgroup-example-interface-file |
| default 150 |
| 8:0 300 |
| |
| The default value can be updated by |
| |
| # echo 125 > cgroup-example-interface-file |
| |
| or |
| |
| # echo "default 125" > cgroup-example-interface-file |
| |
| An override can be set by |
| |
| # echo "8:16 170" > cgroup-example-interface-file |
| |
| and cleared by |
| |
| # echo "8:0 default" > cgroup-example-interface-file |
| # cat cgroup-example-interface-file |
| default 125 |
| 8:16 170 |
| |
| - For events which are not very high frequency, an interface file |
| "events" should be created which lists event key value pairs. |
| Whenever a notifiable event happens, file modified event should be |
| generated on the file. |
| |
| |
| 4-3. Core Interface Files |
| |
| All cgroup core files are prefixed with "cgroup." |
| |
| cgroup.procs |
| |
| A read-write new-line separated values file which exists on |
| all cgroups. |
| |
| When read, it lists the PIDs of all processes which belong to |
| the cgroup one-per-line. The PIDs are not ordered and the |
| same PID may show up more than once if the process got moved |
| to another cgroup and then back or the PID got recycled while |
| reading. |
| |
| A PID can be written to migrate the process associated with |
| the PID to the cgroup. The writer should match all of the |
| following conditions. |
| |
| - Its euid is either root or must match either uid or suid of |
| the target process. |
| |
| - It must have write access to the "cgroup.procs" file. |
| |
| - It must have write access to the "cgroup.procs" file of the |
| common ancestor of the source and destination cgroups. |
| |
| When delegating a sub-hierarchy, write access to this file |
| should be granted along with the containing directory. |
| |
| cgroup.controllers |
| |
| A read-only space separated values file which exists on all |
| cgroups. |
| |
| It shows space separated list of all controllers available to |
| the cgroup. The controllers are not ordered. |
| |
| cgroup.subtree_control |
| |
| A read-write space separated values file which exists on all |
| cgroups. Starts out empty. |
| |
| When read, it shows space separated list of the controllers |
| which are enabled to control resource distribution from the |
| cgroup to its children. |
| |
| Space separated list of controllers prefixed with '+' or '-' |
| can be written to enable or disable controllers. A controller |
| name prefixed with '+' enables the controller and '-' |
| disables. If a controller appears more than once on the list, |
| the last one is effective. When multiple enable and disable |
| operations are specified, either all succeed or all fail. |
| |
| cgroup.events |
| |
| A read-only flat-keyed file which exists on non-root cgroups. |
| The following entries are defined. Unless specified |
| otherwise, a value change in this file generates a file |
| modified event. |
| |
| populated |
| |
| 1 if the cgroup or its descendants contains any live |
| processes; otherwise, 0. |
| |
| |
| 5. Controllers |
| |
| 5-1. CPU |
| |
| [NOTE: The interface for the cpu controller hasn't been merged yet] |
| |
| The "cpu" controllers regulates distribution of CPU cycles. This |
| controller implements weight and absolute bandwidth limit models for |
| normal scheduling policy and absolute bandwidth allocation model for |
| realtime scheduling policy. |
| |
| |
| 5-1-1. CPU Interface Files |
| |
| All time durations are in microseconds. |
| |
| cpu.stat |
| |
| A read-only flat-keyed file which exists on non-root cgroups. |
| |
| It reports the following six stats. |
| |
| usage_usec |
| user_usec |
| system_usec |
| nr_periods |
| nr_throttled |
| throttled_usec |
| |
| cpu.weight |
| |
| A read-write single value file which exists on non-root |
| cgroups. The default is "100". |
| |
| The weight in the range [1, 10000]. |
| |
| cpu.max |
| |
| A read-write two value file which exists on non-root cgroups. |
| The default is "max 100000". |
| |
| The maximum bandwidth limit. It's in the following format. |
| |
| $MAX $PERIOD |
| |
| which indicates that the group may consume upto $MAX in each |
| $PERIOD duration. "max" for $MAX indicates no limit. If only |
| one number is written, $MAX is updated. |
| |
| cpu.rt.max |
| |
| [NOTE: The semantics of this file is still under discussion and the |
| interface hasn't been merged yet] |
| |
| A read-write two value file which exists on all cgroups. |
| The default is "0 100000". |
| |
| The maximum realtime runtime allocation. Over-committing |
| configurations are disallowed and process migrations are |
| rejected if not enough bandwidth is available. It's in the |
| following format. |
| |
| $MAX $PERIOD |
| |
| which indicates that the group may consume upto $MAX in each |
| $PERIOD duration. If only one number is written, $MAX is |
| updated. |
| |
| |
| 5-2. Memory |
| |
| The "memory" controller regulates distribution of memory. Memory is |
| stateful and implements both limit and protection models. Due to the |
| intertwining between memory usage and reclaim pressure and the |
| stateful nature of memory, the distribution model is relatively |
| complex. |
| |
| While not completely water-tight, all major memory usages by a given |
| cgroup are tracked so that the total memory consumption can be |
| accounted and controlled to a reasonable extent. Currently, the |
| following types of memory usages are tracked. |
| |
| - Userland memory - page cache and anonymous memory. |
| |
| - Kernel data structures such as dentries and inodes. |
| |
| - TCP socket buffers. |
| |
| The above list may expand in the future for better coverage. |
| |
| |
| 5-2-1. Memory Interface Files |
| |
| All memory amounts are in bytes. If a value which is not aligned to |
| PAGE_SIZE is written, the value may be rounded up to the closest |
| PAGE_SIZE multiple when read back. |
| |
| memory.current |
| |
| A read-only single value file which exists on non-root |
| cgroups. |
| |
| The total amount of memory currently being used by the cgroup |
| and its descendants. |
| |
| memory.low |
| |
| A read-write single value file which exists on non-root |
| cgroups. The default is "0". |
| |
| Best-effort memory protection. If the memory usages of a |
| cgroup and all its ancestors are below their low boundaries, |
| the cgroup's memory won't be reclaimed unless memory can be |
| reclaimed from unprotected cgroups. |
| |
| Putting more memory than generally available under this |
| protection is discouraged. |
| |
| memory.high |
| |
| A read-write single value file which exists on non-root |
| cgroups. The default is "max". |
| |
| Memory usage throttle limit. This is the main mechanism to |
| control memory usage of a cgroup. If a cgroup's usage goes |
| over the high boundary, the processes of the cgroup are |
| throttled and put under heavy reclaim pressure. |
| |
| Going over the high limit never invokes the OOM killer and |
| under extreme conditions the limit may be breached. |
| |
| memory.max |
| |
| A read-write single value file which exists on non-root |
| cgroups. The default is "max". |
| |
| Memory usage hard limit. This is the final protection |
| mechanism. If a cgroup's memory usage reaches this limit and |
| can't be reduced, the OOM killer is invoked in the cgroup. |
| Under certain circumstances, the usage may go over the limit |
| temporarily. |
| |
| This is the ultimate protection mechanism. As long as the |
| high limit is used and monitored properly, this limit's |
| utility is limited to providing the final safety net. |
| |
| memory.events |
| |
| A read-only flat-keyed file which exists on non-root cgroups. |
| The following entries are defined. Unless specified |
| otherwise, a value change in this file generates a file |
| modified event. |
| |
| low |
| |
| The number of times the cgroup is reclaimed due to |
| high memory pressure even though its usage is under |
| the low boundary. This usually indicates that the low |
| boundary is over-committed. |
| |
| high |
| |
| The number of times processes of the cgroup are |
| throttled and routed to perform direct memory reclaim |
| because the high memory boundary was exceeded. For a |
| cgroup whose memory usage is capped by the high limit |
| rather than global memory pressure, this event's |
| occurrences are expected. |
| |
| max |
| |
| The number of times the cgroup's memory usage was |
| about to go over the max boundary. If direct reclaim |
| fails to bring it down, the OOM killer is invoked. |
| |
| oom |
| |
| The number of times the OOM killer has been invoked in |
| the cgroup. This may not exactly match the number of |
| processes killed but should generally be close. |
| |
| memory.stat |
| |
| A read-only flat-keyed file which exists on non-root cgroups. |
| |
| This breaks down the cgroup's memory footprint into different |
| types of memory, type-specific details, and other information |
| on the state and past events of the memory management system. |
| |
| All memory amounts are in bytes. |
| |
| The entries are ordered to be human readable, and new entries |
| can show up in the middle. Don't rely on items remaining in a |
| fixed position; use the keys to look up specific values! |
| |
| anon |
| |
| Amount of memory used in anonymous mappings such as |
| brk(), sbrk(), and mmap(MAP_ANONYMOUS) |
| |
| file |
| |
| Amount of memory used to cache filesystem data, |
| including tmpfs and shared memory. |
| |
| kernel_stack |
| |
| Amount of memory allocated to kernel stacks. |
| |
| slab |
| |
| Amount of memory used for storing in-kernel data |
| structures. |
| |
| sock |
| |
| Amount of memory used in network transmission buffers |
| |
| file_mapped |
| |
| Amount of cached filesystem data mapped with mmap() |
| |
| file_dirty |
| |
| Amount of cached filesystem data that was modified but |
| not yet written back to disk |
| |
| file_writeback |
| |
| Amount of cached filesystem data that was modified and |
| is currently being written back to disk |
| |
| inactive_anon |
| active_anon |
| inactive_file |
| active_file |
| unevictable |
| |
| Amount of memory, swap-backed and filesystem-backed, |
| on the internal memory management lists used by the |
| page reclaim algorithm |
| |
| slab_reclaimable |
| |
| Part of "slab" that might be reclaimed, such as |
| dentries and inodes. |
| |
| slab_unreclaimable |
| |
| Part of "slab" that cannot be reclaimed on memory |
| pressure. |
| |
| pgfault |
| |
| Total number of page faults incurred |
| |
| pgmajfault |
| |
| Number of major page faults incurred |
| |
| memory.swap.current |
| |
| A read-only single value file which exists on non-root |
| cgroups. |
| |
| The total amount of swap currently being used by the cgroup |
| and its descendants. |
| |
| memory.swap.max |
| |
| A read-write single value file which exists on non-root |
| cgroups. The default is "max". |
| |
| Swap usage hard limit. If a cgroup's swap usage reaches this |
| limit, anonymous meomry of the cgroup will not be swapped out. |
| |
| |
| 5-2-2. Usage Guidelines |
| |
| "memory.high" is the main mechanism to control memory usage. |
| Over-committing on high limit (sum of high limits > available memory) |
| and letting global memory pressure to distribute memory according to |
| usage is a viable strategy. |
| |
| Because breach of the high limit doesn't trigger the OOM killer but |
| throttles the offending cgroup, a management agent has ample |
| opportunities to monitor and take appropriate actions such as granting |
| more memory or terminating the workload. |
| |
| Determining whether a cgroup has enough memory is not trivial as |
| memory usage doesn't indicate whether the workload can benefit from |
| more memory. For example, a workload which writes data received from |
| network to a file can use all available memory but can also operate as |
| performant with a small amount of memory. A measure of memory |
| pressure - how much the workload is being impacted due to lack of |
| memory - is necessary to determine whether a workload needs more |
| memory; unfortunately, memory pressure monitoring mechanism isn't |
| implemented yet. |
| |
| |
| 5-2-3. Memory Ownership |
| |
| A memory area is charged to the cgroup which instantiated it and stays |
| charged to the cgroup until the area is released. Migrating a process |
| to a different cgroup doesn't move the memory usages that it |
| instantiated while in the previous cgroup to the new cgroup. |
| |
| A memory area may be used by processes belonging to different cgroups. |
| To which cgroup the area will be charged is in-deterministic; however, |
| over time, the memory area is likely to end up in a cgroup which has |
| enough memory allowance to avoid high reclaim pressure. |
| |
| If a cgroup sweeps a considerable amount of memory which is expected |
| to be accessed repeatedly by other cgroups, it may make sense to use |
| POSIX_FADV_DONTNEED to relinquish the ownership of memory areas |
| belonging to the affected files to ensure correct memory ownership. |
| |
| |
| 5-3. IO |
| |
| The "io" controller regulates the distribution of IO resources. This |
| controller implements both weight based and absolute bandwidth or IOPS |
| limit distribution; however, weight based distribution is available |
| only if cfq-iosched is in use and neither scheme is available for |
| blk-mq devices. |
| |
| |
| 5-3-1. IO Interface Files |
| |
| io.stat |
| |
| A read-only nested-keyed file which exists on non-root |
| cgroups. |
| |
| Lines are keyed by $MAJ:$MIN device numbers and not ordered. |
| The following nested keys are defined. |
| |
| rbytes Bytes read |
| wbytes Bytes written |
| rios Number of read IOs |
| wios Number of write IOs |
| |
| An example read output follows. |
| |
| 8:16 rbytes=1459200 wbytes=314773504 rios=192 wios=353 |
| 8:0 rbytes=90430464 wbytes=299008000 rios=8950 wios=1252 |
| |
| io.weight |
| |
| A read-write flat-keyed file which exists on non-root cgroups. |
| The default is "default 100". |
| |
| The first line is the default weight applied to devices |
| without specific override. The rest are overrides keyed by |
| $MAJ:$MIN device numbers and not ordered. The weights are in |
| the range [1, 10000] and specifies the relative amount IO time |
| the cgroup can use in relation to its siblings. |
| |
| The default weight can be updated by writing either "default |
| $WEIGHT" or simply "$WEIGHT". Overrides can be set by writing |
| "$MAJ:$MIN $WEIGHT" and unset by writing "$MAJ:$MIN default". |
| |
| An example read output follows. |
| |
| default 100 |
| 8:16 200 |
| 8:0 50 |
| |
| io.max |
| |
| A read-write nested-keyed file which exists on non-root |
| cgroups. |
| |
| BPS and IOPS based IO limit. Lines are keyed by $MAJ:$MIN |
| device numbers and not ordered. The following nested keys are |
| defined. |
| |
| rbps Max read bytes per second |
| wbps Max write bytes per second |
| riops Max read IO operations per second |
| wiops Max write IO operations per second |
| |
| When writing, any number of nested key-value pairs can be |
| specified in any order. "max" can be specified as the value |
| to remove a specific limit. If the same key is specified |
| multiple times, the outcome is undefined. |
| |
| BPS and IOPS are measured in each IO direction and IOs are |
| delayed if limit is reached. Temporary bursts are allowed. |
| |
| Setting read limit at 2M BPS and write at 120 IOPS for 8:16. |
| |
| echo "8:16 rbps=2097152 wiops=120" > io.max |
| |
| Reading returns the following. |
| |
| 8:16 rbps=2097152 wbps=max riops=max wiops=120 |
| |
| Write IOPS limit can be removed by writing the following. |
| |
| echo "8:16 wiops=max" > io.max |
| |
| Reading now returns the following. |
| |
| 8:16 rbps=2097152 wbps=max riops=max wiops=max |
| |
| |
| 5-3-2. Writeback |
| |
| Page cache is dirtied through buffered writes and shared mmaps and |
| written asynchronously to the backing filesystem by the writeback |
| mechanism. Writeback sits between the memory and IO domains and |
| regulates the proportion of dirty memory by balancing dirtying and |
| write IOs. |
| |
| The io controller, in conjunction with the memory controller, |
| implements control of page cache writeback IOs. The memory controller |
| defines the memory domain that dirty memory ratio is calculated and |
| maintained for and the io controller defines the io domain which |
| writes out dirty pages for the memory domain. Both system-wide and |
| per-cgroup dirty memory states are examined and the more restrictive |
| of the two is enforced. |
| |
| cgroup writeback requires explicit support from the underlying |
| filesystem. Currently, cgroup writeback is implemented on ext2, ext4 |
| and btrfs. On other filesystems, all writeback IOs are attributed to |
| the root cgroup. |
| |
| There are inherent differences in memory and writeback management |
| which affects how cgroup ownership is tracked. Memory is tracked per |
| page while writeback per inode. For the purpose of writeback, an |
| inode is assigned to a cgroup and all IO requests to write dirty pages |
| from the inode are attributed to that cgroup. |
| |
| As cgroup ownership for memory is tracked per page, there can be pages |
| which are associated with different cgroups than the one the inode is |
| associated with. These are called foreign pages. The writeback |
| constantly keeps track of foreign pages and, if a particular foreign |
| cgroup becomes the majority over a certain period of time, switches |
| the ownership of the inode to that cgroup. |
| |
| While this model is enough for most use cases where a given inode is |
| mostly dirtied by a single cgroup even when the main writing cgroup |
| changes over time, use cases where multiple cgroups write to a single |
| inode simultaneously are not supported well. In such circumstances, a |
| significant portion of IOs are likely to be attributed incorrectly. |
| As memory controller assigns page ownership on the first use and |
| doesn't update it until the page is released, even if writeback |
| strictly follows page ownership, multiple cgroups dirtying overlapping |
| areas wouldn't work as expected. It's recommended to avoid such usage |
| patterns. |
| |
| The sysctl knobs which affect writeback behavior are applied to cgroup |
| writeback as follows. |
| |
| vm.dirty_background_ratio |
| vm.dirty_ratio |
| |
| These ratios apply the same to cgroup writeback with the |
| amount of available memory capped by limits imposed by the |
| memory controller and system-wide clean memory. |
| |
| vm.dirty_background_bytes |
| vm.dirty_bytes |
| |
| For cgroup writeback, this is calculated into ratio against |
| total available memory and applied the same way as |
| vm.dirty[_background]_ratio. |
| |
| |
| P. Information on Kernel Programming |
| |
| This section contains kernel programming information in the areas |
| where interacting with cgroup is necessary. cgroup core and |
| controllers are not covered. |
| |
| |
| P-1. Filesystem Support for Writeback |
| |
| A filesystem can support cgroup writeback by updating |
| address_space_operations->writepage[s]() to annotate bio's using the |
| following two functions. |
| |
| wbc_init_bio(@wbc, @bio) |
| |
| Should be called for each bio carrying writeback data and |
| associates the bio with the inode's owner cgroup. Can be |
| called anytime between bio allocation and submission. |
| |
| wbc_account_io(@wbc, @page, @bytes) |
| |
| Should be called for each data segment being written out. |
| While this function doesn't care exactly when it's called |
| during the writeback session, it's the easiest and most |
| natural to call it as data segments are added to a bio. |
| |
| With writeback bio's annotated, cgroup support can be enabled per |
| super_block by setting SB_I_CGROUPWB in ->s_iflags. This allows for |
| selective disabling of cgroup writeback support which is helpful when |
| certain filesystem features, e.g. journaled data mode, are |
| incompatible. |
| |
| wbc_init_bio() binds the specified bio to its cgroup. Depending on |
| the configuration, the bio may be executed at a lower priority and if |
| the writeback session is holding shared resources, e.g. a journal |
| entry, may lead to priority inversion. There is no one easy solution |
| for the problem. Filesystems can try to work around specific problem |
| cases by skipping wbc_init_bio() or using bio_associate_blkcg() |
| directly. |
| |
| |
| D. Deprecated v1 Core Features |
| |
| - Multiple hierarchies including named ones are not supported. |
| |
| - All mount options and remounting are not supported. |
| |
| - The "tasks" file is removed and "cgroup.procs" is not sorted. |
| |
| - "cgroup.clone_children" is removed. |
| |
| - /proc/cgroups is meaningless for v2. Use "cgroup.controllers" file |
| at the root instead. |
| |
| |
| R. Issues with v1 and Rationales for v2 |
| |
| R-1. Multiple Hierarchies |
| |
| cgroup v1 allowed an arbitrary number of hierarchies and each |
| hierarchy could host any number of controllers. While this seemed to |
| provide a high level of flexibility, it wasn't useful in practice. |
| |
| For example, as there is only one instance of each controller, utility |
| type controllers such as freezer which can be useful in all |
| hierarchies could only be used in one. The issue is exacerbated by |
| the fact that controllers couldn't be moved to another hierarchy once |
| hierarchies were populated. Another issue was that all controllers |
| bound to a hierarchy were forced to have exactly the same view of the |
| hierarchy. It wasn't possible to vary the granularity depending on |
| the specific controller. |
| |
| In practice, these issues heavily limited which controllers could be |
| put on the same hierarchy and most configurations resorted to putting |
| each controller on its own hierarchy. Only closely related ones, such |
| as the cpu and cpuacct controllers, made sense to be put on the same |
| hierarchy. This often meant that userland ended up managing multiple |
| similar hierarchies repeating the same steps on each hierarchy |
| whenever a hierarchy management operation was necessary. |
| |
| Furthermore, support for multiple hierarchies came at a steep cost. |
| It greatly complicated cgroup core implementation but more importantly |
| the support for multiple hierarchies restricted how cgroup could be |
| used in general and what controllers was able to do. |
| |
| There was no limit on how many hierarchies there might be, which meant |
| that a thread's cgroup membership couldn't be described in finite |
| length. The key might contain any number of entries and was unlimited |
| in length, which made it highly awkward to manipulate and led to |
| addition of controllers which existed only to identify membership, |
| which in turn exacerbated the original problem of proliferating number |
| of hierarchies. |
| |
| Also, as a controller couldn't have any expectation regarding the |
| topologies of hierarchies other controllers might be on, each |
| controller had to assume that all other controllers were attached to |
| completely orthogonal hierarchies. This made it impossible, or at |
| least very cumbersome, for controllers to cooperate with each other. |
| |
| In most use cases, putting controllers on hierarchies which are |
| completely orthogonal to each other isn't necessary. What usually is |
| called for is the ability to have differing levels of granularity |
| depending on the specific controller. In other words, hierarchy may |
| be collapsed from leaf towards root when viewed from specific |
| controllers. For example, a given configuration might not care about |
| how memory is distributed beyond a certain level while still wanting |
| to control how CPU cycles are distributed. |
| |
| |
| R-2. Thread Granularity |
| |
| cgroup v1 allowed threads of a process to belong to different cgroups. |
| This didn't make sense for some controllers and those controllers |
| ended up implementing different ways to ignore such situations but |
| much more importantly it blurred the line between API exposed to |
| individual applications and system management interface. |
| |
| Generally, in-process knowledge is available only to the process |
| itself; thus, unlike service-level organization of processes, |
| categorizing threads of a process requires active participation from |
| the application which owns the target process. |
| |
| cgroup v1 had an ambiguously defined delegation model which got abused |
| in combination with thread granularity. cgroups were delegated to |
| individual applications so that they can create and manage their own |
| sub-hierarchies and control resource distributions along them. This |
| effectively raised cgroup to the status of a syscall-like API exposed |
| to lay programs. |
| |
| First of all, cgroup has a fundamentally inadequate interface to be |
| exposed this way. For a process to access its own knobs, it has to |
| extract the path on the target hierarchy from /proc/self/cgroup, |
| construct the path by appending the name of the knob to the path, open |
| and then read and/or write to it. This is not only extremely clunky |
| and unusual but also inherently racy. There is no conventional way to |
| define transaction across the required steps and nothing can guarantee |
| that the process would actually be operating on its own sub-hierarchy. |
| |
| cgroup controllers implemented a number of knobs which would never be |
| accepted as public APIs because they were just adding control knobs to |
| system-management pseudo filesystem. cgroup ended up with interface |
| knobs which were not properly abstracted or refined and directly |
| revealed kernel internal details. These knobs got exposed to |
| individual applications through the ill-defined delegation mechanism |
| effectively abusing cgroup as a shortcut to implementing public APIs |
| without going through the required scrutiny. |
| |
| This was painful for both userland and kernel. Userland ended up with |
| misbehaving and poorly abstracted interfaces and kernel exposing and |
| locked into constructs inadvertently. |
| |
| |
| R-3. Competition Between Inner Nodes and Threads |
| |
| cgroup v1 allowed threads to be in any cgroups which created an |
| interesting problem where threads belonging to a parent cgroup and its |
| children cgroups competed for resources. This was nasty as two |
| different types of entities competed and there was no obvious way to |
| settle it. Different controllers did different things. |
| |
| The cpu controller considered threads and cgroups as equivalents and |
| mapped nice levels to cgroup weights. This worked for some cases but |
| fell flat when children wanted to be allocated specific ratios of CPU |
| cycles and the number of internal threads fluctuated - the ratios |
| constantly changed as the number of competing entities fluctuated. |
| There also were other issues. The mapping from nice level to weight |
| wasn't obvious or universal, and there were various other knobs which |
| simply weren't available for threads. |
| |
| The io controller implicitly created a hidden leaf node for each |
| cgroup to host the threads. The hidden leaf had its own copies of all |
| the knobs with "leaf_" prefixed. While this allowed equivalent |
| control over internal threads, it was with serious drawbacks. It |
| always added an extra layer of nesting which wouldn't be necessary |
| otherwise, made the interface messy and significantly complicated the |
| implementation. |
| |
| The memory controller didn't have a way to control what happened |
| between internal tasks and child cgroups and the behavior was not |
| clearly defined. There were attempts to add ad-hoc behaviors and |
| knobs to tailor the behavior to specific workloads which would have |
| led to problems extremely difficult to resolve in the long term. |
| |
| Multiple controllers struggled with internal tasks and came up with |
| different ways to deal with it; unfortunately, all the approaches were |
| severely flawed and, furthermore, the widely different behaviors |
| made cgroup as a whole highly inconsistent. |
| |
| This clearly is a problem which needs to be addressed from cgroup core |
| in a uniform way. |
| |
| |
| R-4. Other Interface Issues |
| |
| cgroup v1 grew without oversight and developed a large number of |
| idiosyncrasies and inconsistencies. One issue on the cgroup core side |
| was how an empty cgroup was notified - a userland helper binary was |
| forked and executed for each event. The event delivery wasn't |
| recursive or delegatable. The limitations of the mechanism also led |
| to in-kernel event delivery filtering mechanism further complicating |
| the interface. |
| |
| Controller interfaces were problematic too. An extreme example is |
| controllers completely ignoring hierarchical organization and treating |
| all cgroups as if they were all located directly under the root |
| cgroup. Some controllers exposed a large amount of inconsistent |
| implementation details to userland. |
| |
| There also was no consistency across controllers. When a new cgroup |
| was created, some controllers defaulted to not imposing extra |
| restrictions while others disallowed any resource usage until |
| explicitly configured. Configuration knobs for the same type of |
| control used widely differing naming schemes and formats. Statistics |
| and information knobs were named arbitrarily and used different |
| formats and units even in the same controller. |
| |
| cgroup v2 establishes common conventions where appropriate and updates |
| controllers so that they expose minimal and consistent interfaces. |
| |
| |
| R-5. Controller Issues and Remedies |
| |
| R-5-1. Memory |
| |
| The original lower boundary, the soft limit, is defined as a limit |
| that is per default unset. As a result, the set of cgroups that |
| global reclaim prefers is opt-in, rather than opt-out. The costs for |
| optimizing these mostly negative lookups are so high that the |
| implementation, despite its enormous size, does not even provide the |
| basic desirable behavior. First off, the soft limit has no |
| hierarchical meaning. All configured groups are organized in a global |
| rbtree and treated like equal peers, regardless where they are located |
| in the hierarchy. This makes subtree delegation impossible. Second, |
| the soft limit reclaim pass is so aggressive that it not just |
| introduces high allocation latencies into the system, but also impacts |
| system performance due to overreclaim, to the point where the feature |
| becomes self-defeating. |
| |
| The memory.low boundary on the other hand is a top-down allocated |
| reserve. A cgroup enjoys reclaim protection when it and all its |
| ancestors are below their low boundaries, which makes delegation of |
| subtrees possible. Secondly, new cgroups have no reserve per default |
| and in the common case most cgroups are eligible for the preferred |
| reclaim pass. This allows the new low boundary to be efficiently |
| implemented with just a minor addition to the generic reclaim code, |
| without the need for out-of-band data structures and reclaim passes. |
| Because the generic reclaim code considers all cgroups except for the |
| ones running low in the preferred first reclaim pass, overreclaim of |
| individual groups is eliminated as well, resulting in much better |
| overall workload performance. |
| |
| The original high boundary, the hard limit, is defined as a strict |
| limit that can not budge, even if the OOM killer has to be called. |
| But this generally goes against the goal of making the most out of the |
| available memory. The memory consumption of workloads varies during |
| runtime, and that requires users to overcommit. But doing that with a |
| strict upper limit requires either a fairly accurate prediction of the |
| working set size or adding slack to the limit. Since working set size |
| estimation is hard and error prone, and getting it wrong results in |
| OOM kills, most users tend to err on the side of a looser limit and |
| end up wasting precious resources. |
| |
| The memory.high boundary on the other hand can be set much more |
| conservatively. When hit, it throttles allocations by forcing them |
| into direct reclaim to work off the excess, but it never invokes the |
| OOM killer. As a result, a high boundary that is chosen too |
| aggressively will not terminate the processes, but instead it will |
| lead to gradual performance degradation. The user can monitor this |
| and make corrections until the minimal memory footprint that still |
| gives acceptable performance is found. |
| |
| In extreme cases, with many concurrent allocations and a complete |
| breakdown of reclaim progress within the group, the high boundary can |
| be exceeded. But even then it's mostly better to satisfy the |
| allocation from the slack available in other groups or the rest of the |
| system than killing the group. Otherwise, memory.max is there to |
| limit this type of spillover and ultimately contain buggy or even |
| malicious applications. |
| |
| Setting the original memory.limit_in_bytes below the current usage was |
| subject to a race condition, where concurrent charges could cause the |
| limit setting to fail. memory.max on the other hand will first set the |
| limit to prevent new charges, and then reclaim and OOM kill until the |
| new limit is met - or the task writing to memory.max is killed. |
| |
| The combined memory+swap accounting and limiting is replaced by real |
| control over swap space. |
| |
| The main argument for a combined memory+swap facility in the original |
| cgroup design was that global or parental pressure would always be |
| able to swap all anonymous memory of a child group, regardless of the |
| child's own (possibly untrusted) configuration. However, untrusted |
| groups can sabotage swapping by other means - such as referencing its |
| anonymous memory in a tight loop - and an admin can not assume full |
| swappability when overcommitting untrusted jobs. |
| |
| For trusted jobs, on the other hand, a combined counter is not an |
| intuitive userspace interface, and it flies in the face of the idea |
| that cgroup controllers should account and limit specific physical |
| resources. Swap space is a resource like all others in the system, |
| and that's why unified hierarchy allows distributing it separately. |