blob: d25f8d3796806eee10a38e33187807489eea25b0 [file] [log] [blame]
Jason Cooper2a933002013-12-17 16:59:40 +00001
2 Devicetree (DT) ABI
3
4I. Regarding stable bindings/ABI, we quote from the 2013 ARM mini-summit
5 summary document:
6
7 "That still leaves the question of, what does a stable binding look
8 like? Certainly a stable binding means that a newer kernel will not
9 break on an older device tree, but that doesn't mean the binding is
10 frozen for all time. Grant said there are ways to change bindings that
11 don't result in breakage. For instance, if a new property is added,
12 then default to the previous behaviour if it is missing. If a binding
13 truly needs an incompatible change, then change the compatible string
14 at the same time. The driver can bind against both the old and the
15 new. These guidelines aren't new, but they desperately need to be
16 documented."
17
18II. General binding rules
19
20 1) Maintainers, don't let perfect be the enemy of good. Don't hold up a
21 binding because it isn't perfect.
22
23 2) Use specific compatible strings so that if we need to add a feature (DMA)
24 in the future, we can create a new compatible string. See I.
25
26 3) Bindings can be augmented, but the driver shouldn't break when given
27 the old binding. ie. add additional properties, but don't change the
28 meaning of an existing property. For drivers, default to the original
29 behaviour when a newly added property is missing.
30
31 4) Don't submit bindings for staging or unstable. That will be decided by
32 the devicetree maintainers *after* discussion on the mailinglist.
33
34III. Notes
35
36 1) This document is intended as a general familiarization with the process as
37 decided at the 2013 Kernel Summit. When in doubt, the current word of the
38 devicetree maintainers overrules this document. In that situation, a patch
39 updating this document would be appreciated.