blob: 5c7f310f32bb9f4d3b92fda7f2b916e4a5339f4f [file] [log] [blame]
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki9836d892009-01-07 18:08:27 -08001Memory Resource Controller(Memcg) Implementation Memo.
Daisuke Nishimura1080d7a2010-03-10 15:22:31 -08002Last Updated: 2010/2
3Base Kernel Version: based on 2.6.33-rc7-mm(candidate for 34).
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki9836d892009-01-07 18:08:27 -08004
5Because VM is getting complex (one of reasons is memcg...), memcg's behavior
6is complex. This is a document for memcg's internal behavior.
7Please note that implementation details can be changed.
8
seokhoon.yoon09c3bcc2016-08-02 23:23:57 +09009(*) Topics on API should be in Documentation/cgroup-v1/memory.txt)
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki9836d892009-01-07 18:08:27 -080010
110. How to record usage ?
12 2 objects are used.
13
14 page_cgroup ....an object per page.
15 Allocated at boot or memory hotplug. Freed at memory hot removal.
16
17 swap_cgroup ... an entry per swp_entry.
18 Allocated at swapon(). Freed at swapoff().
19
20 The page_cgroup has USED bit and double count against a page_cgroup never
21 occurs. swap_cgroup is used only when a charged page is swapped-out.
22
231. Charge
24
25 a page/swp_entry may be charged (usage += PAGE_SIZE) at
26
Johannes Weiner00501b52014-08-08 14:19:20 -070027 mem_cgroup_try_charge()
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki9836d892009-01-07 18:08:27 -080028
292. Uncharge
30 a page/swp_entry may be uncharged (usage -= PAGE_SIZE) by
31
Johannes Weiner0a31bc92014-08-08 14:19:22 -070032 mem_cgroup_uncharge()
33 Called when a page's refcount goes down to 0.
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki9836d892009-01-07 18:08:27 -080034
35 mem_cgroup_uncharge_swap()
36 Called when swp_entry's refcnt goes down to 0. A charge against swap
37 disappears.
38
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki9836d892009-01-07 18:08:27 -0800393. charge-commit-cancel
Johannes Weiner00501b52014-08-08 14:19:20 -070040 Memcg pages are charged in two steps:
41 mem_cgroup_try_charge()
42 mem_cgroup_commit_charge() or mem_cgroup_cancel_charge()
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki9836d892009-01-07 18:08:27 -080043
44 At try_charge(), there are no flags to say "this page is charged".
45 at this point, usage += PAGE_SIZE.
46
Johannes Weiner00501b52014-08-08 14:19:20 -070047 At commit(), the page is associated with the memcg.
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki9836d892009-01-07 18:08:27 -080048
49 At cancel(), simply usage -= PAGE_SIZE.
50
51Under below explanation, we assume CONFIG_MEM_RES_CTRL_SWAP=y.
52
534. Anonymous
54 Anonymous page is newly allocated at
55 - page fault into MAP_ANONYMOUS mapping.
56 - Copy-On-Write.
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki9836d892009-01-07 18:08:27 -080057
58 4.1 Swap-in.
59 At swap-in, the page is taken from swap-cache. There are 2 cases.
60
61 (a) If the SwapCache is newly allocated and read, it has no charges.
62 (b) If the SwapCache has been mapped by processes, it has been
63 charged already.
64
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki9836d892009-01-07 18:08:27 -080065 4.2 Swap-out.
66 At swap-out, typical state transition is below.
67
68 (a) add to swap cache. (marked as SwapCache)
69 swp_entry's refcnt += 1.
70 (b) fully unmapped.
71 swp_entry's refcnt += # of ptes.
72 (c) write back to swap.
73 (d) delete from swap cache. (remove from SwapCache)
74 swp_entry's refcnt -= 1.
75
76
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki9836d892009-01-07 18:08:27 -080077 Finally, at task exit,
78 (e) zap_pte() is called and swp_entry's refcnt -=1 -> 0.
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki9836d892009-01-07 18:08:27 -080079
805. Page Cache
81 Page Cache is charged at
82 - add_to_page_cache_locked().
83
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki9836d892009-01-07 18:08:27 -080084 The logic is very clear. (About migration, see below)
85 Note: __remove_from_page_cache() is called by remove_from_page_cache()
86 and __remove_mapping().
87
886. Shmem(tmpfs) Page Cache
Johannes Weiner0a31bc92014-08-08 14:19:22 -070089 The best way to understand shmem's page state transition is to read
90 mm/shmem.c.
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki9836d892009-01-07 18:08:27 -080091 But brief explanation of the behavior of memcg around shmem will be
92 helpful to understand the logic.
93
94 Shmem's page (just leaf page, not direct/indirect block) can be on
95 - radix-tree of shmem's inode.
96 - SwapCache.
97 - Both on radix-tree and SwapCache. This happens at swap-in
98 and swap-out,
99
100 It's charged when...
101 - A new page is added to shmem's radix-tree.
102 - A swp page is read. (move a charge from swap_cgroup to page_cgroup)
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki9836d892009-01-07 18:08:27 -0800103
1047. Page Migration
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki9836d892009-01-07 18:08:27 -0800105
Johannes Weiner0a31bc92014-08-08 14:19:22 -0700106 mem_cgroup_migrate()
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki9836d892009-01-07 18:08:27 -0800107
1088. LRU
Francis Galieguea33f3222010-04-23 00:08:02 +0200109 Each memcg has its own private LRU. Now, its handling is under global
Mel Gormana52633d2016-07-28 15:45:28 -0700110 VM's control (means that it's handled under global zone_lru_lock).
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki9836d892009-01-07 18:08:27 -0800111 Almost all routines around memcg's LRU is called by global LRU's
Mel Gormana52633d2016-07-28 15:45:28 -0700112 list management functions under zone_lru_lock().
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki9836d892009-01-07 18:08:27 -0800113
114 A special function is mem_cgroup_isolate_pages(). This scans
115 memcg's private LRU and call __isolate_lru_page() to extract a page
116 from LRU.
117 (By __isolate_lru_page(), the page is removed from both of global and
118 private LRU.)
119
120
1219. Typical Tests.
122
123 Tests for racy cases.
124
125 9.1 Small limit to memcg.
126 When you do test to do racy case, it's good test to set memcg's limit
127 to be very small rather than GB. Many races found in the test under
128 xKB or xxMB limits.
129 (Memory behavior under GB and Memory behavior under MB shows very
130 different situation.)
131
132 9.2 Shmem
133 Historically, memcg's shmem handling was poor and we saw some amount
134 of troubles here. This is because shmem is page-cache but can be
135 SwapCache. Test with shmem/tmpfs is always good test.
136
137 9.3 Migration
138 For NUMA, migration is an another special case. To do easy test, cpuset
139 is useful. Following is a sample script to do migration.
140
141 mount -t cgroup -o cpuset none /opt/cpuset
142
143 mkdir /opt/cpuset/01
144 echo 1 > /opt/cpuset/01/cpuset.cpus
145 echo 0 > /opt/cpuset/01/cpuset.mems
146 echo 1 > /opt/cpuset/01/cpuset.memory_migrate
147 mkdir /opt/cpuset/02
148 echo 1 > /opt/cpuset/02/cpuset.cpus
149 echo 1 > /opt/cpuset/02/cpuset.mems
150 echo 1 > /opt/cpuset/02/cpuset.memory_migrate
151
152 In above set, when you moves a task from 01 to 02, page migration to
153 node 0 to node 1 will occur. Following is a script to migrate all
154 under cpuset.
155 --
156 move_task()
157 {
158 for pid in $1
159 do
160 /bin/echo $pid >$2/tasks 2>/dev/null
161 echo -n $pid
162 echo -n " "
163 done
164 echo END
165 }
166
167 G1_TASK=`cat ${G1}/tasks`
168 G2_TASK=`cat ${G2}/tasks`
169 move_task "${G1_TASK}" ${G2} &
170 --
171 9.4 Memory hotplug.
172 memory hotplug test is one of good test.
173 to offline memory, do following.
174 # echo offline > /sys/devices/system/memory/memoryXXX/state
175 (XXX is the place of memory)
176 This is an easy way to test page migration, too.
177
178 9.5 mkdir/rmdir
179 When using hierarchy, mkdir/rmdir test should be done.
180 Use tests like the following.
181
182 echo 1 >/opt/cgroup/01/memory/use_hierarchy
183 mkdir /opt/cgroup/01/child_a
184 mkdir /opt/cgroup/01/child_b
185
186 set limit to 01.
187 add limit to 01/child_b
188 run jobs under child_a and child_b
189
190 create/delete following groups at random while jobs are running.
191 /opt/cgroup/01/child_a/child_aa
192 /opt/cgroup/01/child_b/child_bb
193 /opt/cgroup/01/child_c
194
195 running new jobs in new group is also good.
196
197 9.6 Mount with other subsystems.
198 Mounting with other subsystems is a good test because there is a
199 race and lock dependency with other cgroup subsystems.
200
201 example)
Kirill A. Shutemov0263c122010-03-10 15:22:37 -0800202 # mount -t cgroup none /cgroup -o cpuset,memory,cpu,devices
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki9836d892009-01-07 18:08:27 -0800203
204 and do task move, mkdir, rmdir etc...under this.
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki8d50d362009-01-29 14:25:14 -0800205
206 9.7 swapoff.
207 Besides management of swap is one of complicated parts of memcg,
208 call path of swap-in at swapoff is not same as usual swap-in path..
209 It's worth to be tested explicitly.
210
211 For example, test like following is good.
212 (Shell-A)
Kirill A. Shutemov0263c122010-03-10 15:22:37 -0800213 # mount -t cgroup none /cgroup -o memory
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki8d50d362009-01-29 14:25:14 -0800214 # mkdir /cgroup/test
215 # echo 40M > /cgroup/test/memory.limit_in_bytes
216 # echo 0 > /cgroup/test/tasks
217 Run malloc(100M) program under this. You'll see 60M of swaps.
218 (Shell-B)
219 # move all tasks in /cgroup/test to /cgroup
220 # /sbin/swapoff -a
Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo6d5e1472009-02-03 11:57:13 +0100221 # rmdir /cgroup/test
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki8d50d362009-01-29 14:25:14 -0800222 # kill malloc task.
223
224 Of course, tmpfs v.s. swapoff test should be tested, too.
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki0b7f5692009-04-02 16:57:38 -0700225
226 9.8 OOM-Killer
227 Out-of-memory caused by memcg's limit will kill tasks under
228 the memcg. When hierarchy is used, a task under hierarchy
229 will be killed by the kernel.
230 In this case, panic_on_oom shouldn't be invoked and tasks
231 in other groups shouldn't be killed.
232
233 It's not difficult to cause OOM under memcg as following.
234 Case A) when you can swapoff
235 #swapoff -a
236 #echo 50M > /memory.limit_in_bytes
237 run 51M of malloc
238
239 Case B) when you use mem+swap limitation.
240 #echo 50M > memory.limit_in_bytes
241 #echo 50M > memory.memsw.limit_in_bytes
242 run 51M of malloc
Daisuke Nishimura1080d7a2010-03-10 15:22:31 -0800243
244 9.9 Move charges at task migration
245 Charges associated with a task can be moved along with task migration.
246
247 (Shell-A)
248 #mkdir /cgroup/A
249 #echo $$ >/cgroup/A/tasks
250 run some programs which uses some amount of memory in /cgroup/A.
251
252 (Shell-B)
253 #mkdir /cgroup/B
254 #echo 1 >/cgroup/B/memory.move_charge_at_immigrate
255 #echo "pid of the program running in group A" >/cgroup/B/tasks
256
257 You can see charges have been moved by reading *.usage_in_bytes or
258 memory.stat of both A and B.
seokhoon.yoon09c3bcc2016-08-02 23:23:57 +0900259 See 8.2 of Documentation/cgroup-v1/memory.txt to see what value should be
Daisuke Nishimura1080d7a2010-03-10 15:22:31 -0800260 written to move_charge_at_immigrate.
Kirill A. Shutemov1e111452010-03-10 15:22:36 -0800261
262 9.10 Memory thresholds
Uwe Kleine-Königb5950762010-11-01 15:38:34 -0400263 Memory controller implements memory thresholds using cgroups notification
Greg Thelen92e015b2013-01-04 13:05:17 -0800264 API. You can use tools/cgroup/cgroup_event_listener.c to test it.
Kirill A. Shutemov1e111452010-03-10 15:22:36 -0800265
266 (Shell-A) Create cgroup and run event listener
267 # mkdir /cgroup/A
268 # ./cgroup_event_listener /cgroup/A/memory.usage_in_bytes 5M
269
270 (Shell-B) Add task to cgroup and try to allocate and free memory
271 # echo $$ >/cgroup/A/tasks
272 # a="$(dd if=/dev/zero bs=1M count=10)"
273 # a=
274
275 You will see message from cgroup_event_listener every time you cross
276 the thresholds.
277
278 Use /cgroup/A/memory.memsw.usage_in_bytes to test memsw thresholds.
279
280 It's good idea to test root cgroup as well.