Alexandre Courbot | fd8e198 | 2013-11-16 21:34:21 +0900 | [diff] [blame] | 1 | GPIO Descriptor Driver Interface |
| 2 | ================================ |
| 3 | |
| 4 | This document serves as a guide for GPIO chip drivers writers. Note that it |
| 5 | describes the new descriptor-based interface. For a description of the |
| 6 | deprecated integer-based GPIO interface please refer to gpio-legacy.txt. |
| 7 | |
| 8 | Each GPIO controller driver needs to include the following header, which defines |
| 9 | the structures used to define a GPIO driver: |
| 10 | |
| 11 | #include <linux/gpio/driver.h> |
| 12 | |
| 13 | |
| 14 | Internal Representation of GPIOs |
| 15 | ================================ |
| 16 | |
| 17 | Inside a GPIO driver, individual GPIOs are identified by their hardware number, |
| 18 | which is a unique number between 0 and n, n being the number of GPIOs managed by |
| 19 | the chip. This number is purely internal: the hardware number of a particular |
| 20 | GPIO descriptor is never made visible outside of the driver. |
| 21 | |
| 22 | On top of this internal number, each GPIO also need to have a global number in |
| 23 | the integer GPIO namespace so that it can be used with the legacy GPIO |
| 24 | interface. Each chip must thus have a "base" number (which can be automatically |
| 25 | assigned), and for each GPIO the global number will be (base + hardware number). |
| 26 | Although the integer representation is considered deprecated, it still has many |
| 27 | users and thus needs to be maintained. |
| 28 | |
| 29 | So for example one platform could use numbers 32-159 for GPIOs, with a |
| 30 | controller defining 128 GPIOs at a "base" of 32 ; while another platform uses |
| 31 | numbers 0..63 with one set of GPIO controllers, 64-79 with another type of GPIO |
| 32 | controller, and on one particular board 80-95 with an FPGA. The numbers need not |
| 33 | be contiguous; either of those platforms could also use numbers 2000-2063 to |
| 34 | identify GPIOs in a bank of I2C GPIO expanders. |
| 35 | |
| 36 | |
| 37 | Controller Drivers: gpio_chip |
| 38 | ============================= |
| 39 | |
| 40 | In the gpiolib framework each GPIO controller is packaged as a "struct |
| 41 | gpio_chip" (see linux/gpio/driver.h for its complete definition) with members |
| 42 | common to each controller of that type: |
| 43 | |
Linus Walleij | 7354740 | 2017-01-31 15:43:05 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 44 | - methods to establish GPIO line direction |
| 45 | - methods used to access GPIO line values |
| 46 | - method to set electrical configuration to a a given GPIO line |
| 47 | - method to return the IRQ number associated to a given GPIO line |
Alexandre Courbot | fd8e198 | 2013-11-16 21:34:21 +0900 | [diff] [blame] | 48 | - flag saying whether calls to its methods may sleep |
Linus Walleij | 7354740 | 2017-01-31 15:43:05 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 49 | - optional line names array to identify lines |
Alexandre Courbot | fd8e198 | 2013-11-16 21:34:21 +0900 | [diff] [blame] | 50 | - optional debugfs dump method (showing extra state like pullup config) |
| 51 | - optional base number (will be automatically assigned if omitted) |
Linus Walleij | 7354740 | 2017-01-31 15:43:05 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 52 | - optional label for diagnostics and GPIO chip mapping using platform data |
Alexandre Courbot | fd8e198 | 2013-11-16 21:34:21 +0900 | [diff] [blame] | 53 | |
| 54 | The code implementing a gpio_chip should support multiple instances of the |
| 55 | controller, possibly using the driver model. That code will configure each |
Linus Walleij | 7354740 | 2017-01-31 15:43:05 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 56 | gpio_chip and issue gpiochip_add[_data]() or devm_gpiochip_add_data(). |
| 57 | Removing a GPIO controller should be rare; use [devm_]gpiochip_remove() when |
| 58 | it is unavoidable. |
Alexandre Courbot | fd8e198 | 2013-11-16 21:34:21 +0900 | [diff] [blame] | 59 | |
Linus Walleij | 7354740 | 2017-01-31 15:43:05 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 60 | Often a gpio_chip is part of an instance-specific structure with states not |
Alexandre Courbot | fd8e198 | 2013-11-16 21:34:21 +0900 | [diff] [blame] | 61 | exposed by the GPIO interfaces, such as addressing, power management, and more. |
Linus Walleij | 7354740 | 2017-01-31 15:43:05 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 62 | Chips such as audio codecs will have complex non-GPIO states. |
Alexandre Courbot | fd8e198 | 2013-11-16 21:34:21 +0900 | [diff] [blame] | 63 | |
| 64 | Any debugfs dump method should normally ignore signals which haven't been |
| 65 | requested as GPIOs. They can use gpiochip_is_requested(), which returns either |
| 66 | NULL or the label associated with that GPIO when it was requested. |
| 67 | |
Linus Walleij | 7354740 | 2017-01-31 15:43:05 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 68 | RT_FULL: the GPIO driver should not use spinlock_t or any sleepable APIs |
Grygorii Strashko | c307b00 | 2015-10-20 17:22:15 +0300 | [diff] [blame] | 69 | (like PM runtime) in its gpio_chip implementation (.get/.set and direction |
| 70 | control callbacks) if it is expected to call GPIO APIs from atomic context |
| 71 | on -RT (inside hard IRQ handlers and similar contexts). Normally this should |
| 72 | not be required. |
Linus Walleij | 99adc05 | 2014-01-22 15:00:55 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 73 | |
Linus Walleij | 6b5029d | 2016-04-05 16:49:57 +0200 | [diff] [blame] | 74 | |
Linus Walleij | 7354740 | 2017-01-31 15:43:05 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 75 | GPIO electrical configuration |
| 76 | ----------------------------- |
| 77 | |
| 78 | GPIOs can be configured for several electrical modes of operation by using the |
| 79 | .set_config() callback. Currently this API supports setting debouncing and |
| 80 | single-ended modes (open drain/open source). These settings are described |
| 81 | below. |
| 82 | |
| 83 | The .set_config() callback uses the same enumerators and configuration |
| 84 | semantics as the generic pin control drivers. This is not a coincidence: it is |
| 85 | possible to assign the .set_config() to the function gpiochip_generic_config() |
| 86 | which will result in pinctrl_gpio_set_config() being called and eventually |
| 87 | ending up in the pin control back-end "behind" the GPIO controller, usually |
| 88 | closer to the actual pins. This way the pin controller can manage the below |
| 89 | listed GPIO configurations. |
| 90 | |
| 91 | |
| 92 | GPIOs with debounce support |
| 93 | --------------------------- |
| 94 | |
| 95 | Debouncing is a configuration set to a pin indicating that it is connected to |
| 96 | a mechanical switch or button, or similar that may bounce. Bouncing means the |
| 97 | line is pulled high/low quickly at very short intervals for mechanical |
| 98 | reasons. This can result in the value being unstable or irqs fireing repeatedly |
| 99 | unless the line is debounced. |
| 100 | |
| 101 | Debouncing in practice involves setting up a timer when something happens on |
| 102 | the line, wait a little while and then sample the line again, so see if it |
| 103 | still has the same value (low or high). This could also be repeated by a clever |
| 104 | state machine, waiting for a line to become stable. In either case, it sets |
| 105 | a certain number of milliseconds for debouncing, or just "on/off" if that time |
| 106 | is not configurable. |
| 107 | |
| 108 | |
Linus Walleij | 6b5029d | 2016-04-05 16:49:57 +0200 | [diff] [blame] | 109 | GPIOs with open drain/source support |
| 110 | ------------------------------------ |
| 111 | |
| 112 | Open drain (CMOS) or open collector (TTL) means the line is not actively driven |
| 113 | high: instead you provide the drain/collector as output, so when the transistor |
| 114 | is not open, it will present a high-impedance (tristate) to the external rail. |
| 115 | |
| 116 | |
| 117 | CMOS CONFIGURATION TTL CONFIGURATION |
| 118 | |
| 119 | ||--- out +--- out |
| 120 | in ----|| |/ |
| 121 | ||--+ in ----| |
| 122 | | |\ |
| 123 | GND GND |
| 124 | |
| 125 | This configuration is normally used as a way to achieve one of two things: |
| 126 | |
| 127 | - Level-shifting: to reach a logical level higher than that of the silicon |
| 128 | where the output resides. |
| 129 | |
| 130 | - inverse wire-OR on an I/O line, for example a GPIO line, making it possible |
| 131 | for any driving stage on the line to drive it low even if any other output |
| 132 | to the same line is simultaneously driving it high. A special case of this |
| 133 | is driving the SCL and SCA lines of an I2C bus, which is by definition a |
| 134 | wire-OR bus. |
| 135 | |
| 136 | Both usecases require that the line be equipped with a pull-up resistor. This |
| 137 | resistor will make the line tend to high level unless one of the transistors on |
| 138 | the rail actively pulls it down. |
| 139 | |
Linus Walleij | 451938d5 | 2016-04-27 10:23:44 +0200 | [diff] [blame] | 140 | The level on the line will go as high as the VDD on the pull-up resistor, which |
| 141 | may be higher than the level supported by the transistor, achieveing a |
| 142 | level-shift to the higher VDD. |
| 143 | |
Linus Walleij | 6b5029d | 2016-04-05 16:49:57 +0200 | [diff] [blame] | 144 | Integrated electronics often have an output driver stage in the form of a CMOS |
| 145 | "totem-pole" with one N-MOS and one P-MOS transistor where one of them drives |
| 146 | the line high and one of them drives the line low. This is called a push-pull |
| 147 | output. The "totem-pole" looks like so: |
| 148 | |
| 149 | VDD |
| 150 | | |
| 151 | OD ||--+ |
| 152 | +--/ ---o|| P-MOS-FET |
| 153 | | ||--+ |
Linus Walleij | 451938d5 | 2016-04-27 10:23:44 +0200 | [diff] [blame] | 154 | IN --+ +----- out |
Linus Walleij | 6b5029d | 2016-04-05 16:49:57 +0200 | [diff] [blame] | 155 | | ||--+ |
| 156 | +--/ ----|| N-MOS-FET |
| 157 | OS ||--+ |
| 158 | | |
| 159 | GND |
| 160 | |
Linus Walleij | 451938d5 | 2016-04-27 10:23:44 +0200 | [diff] [blame] | 161 | The desired output signal (e.g. coming directly from some GPIO output register) |
| 162 | arrives at IN. The switches named "OD" and "OS" are normally closed, creating |
| 163 | a push-pull circuit. |
| 164 | |
| 165 | Consider the little "switches" named "OD" and "OS" that enable/disable the |
Linus Walleij | 6b5029d | 2016-04-05 16:49:57 +0200 | [diff] [blame] | 166 | P-MOS or N-MOS transistor right after the split of the input. As you can see, |
| 167 | either transistor will go totally numb if this switch is open. The totem-pole |
| 168 | is then halved and give high impedance instead of actively driving the line |
| 169 | high or low respectively. That is usually how software-controlled open |
| 170 | drain/source works. |
| 171 | |
| 172 | Some GPIO hardware come in open drain / open source configuration. Some are |
| 173 | hard-wired lines that will only support open drain or open source no matter |
| 174 | what: there is only one transistor there. Some are software-configurable: |
| 175 | by flipping a bit in a register the output can be configured as open drain |
Linus Walleij | 451938d5 | 2016-04-27 10:23:44 +0200 | [diff] [blame] | 176 | or open source, in practice by flicking open the switches labeled "OD" and "OS" |
| 177 | in the drawing above. |
Linus Walleij | 6b5029d | 2016-04-05 16:49:57 +0200 | [diff] [blame] | 178 | |
| 179 | By disabling the P-MOS transistor, the output can be driven between GND and |
| 180 | high impedance (open drain), and by disabling the N-MOS transistor, the output |
| 181 | can be driven between VDD and high impedance (open source). In the first case, |
| 182 | a pull-up resistor is needed on the outgoing rail to complete the circuit, and |
| 183 | in the second case, a pull-down resistor is needed on the rail. |
| 184 | |
| 185 | Hardware that supports open drain or open source or both, can implement a |
Mika Westerberg | 2956b5d | 2017-01-23 15:34:34 +0300 | [diff] [blame] | 186 | special callback in the gpio_chip: .set_config() that takes a generic |
| 187 | pinconf packed value telling whether to configure the line as open drain, |
| 188 | open source or push-pull. This will happen in response to the |
| 189 | GPIO_OPEN_DRAIN or GPIO_OPEN_SOURCE flag set in the machine file, or coming |
| 190 | from other hardware descriptions. |
Linus Walleij | 6b5029d | 2016-04-05 16:49:57 +0200 | [diff] [blame] | 191 | |
| 192 | If this state can not be configured in hardware, i.e. if the GPIO hardware does |
| 193 | not support open drain/open source in hardware, the GPIO library will instead |
| 194 | use a trick: when a line is set as output, if the line is flagged as open |
Linus Walleij | 451938d5 | 2016-04-27 10:23:44 +0200 | [diff] [blame] | 195 | drain, and the IN output value is low, it will be driven low as usual. But |
| 196 | if the IN output value is set to high, it will instead *NOT* be driven high, |
Linus Walleij | 6b5029d | 2016-04-05 16:49:57 +0200 | [diff] [blame] | 197 | instead it will be switched to input, as input mode is high impedance, thus |
| 198 | achieveing an "open drain emulation" of sorts: electrically the behaviour will |
| 199 | be identical, with the exception of possible hardware glitches when switching |
| 200 | the mode of the line. |
| 201 | |
| 202 | For open source configuration the same principle is used, just that instead |
| 203 | of actively driving the line low, it is set to input. |
| 204 | |
| 205 | |
Linus Walleij | 99adc05 | 2014-01-22 15:00:55 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 206 | GPIO drivers providing IRQs |
| 207 | --------------------------- |
| 208 | It is custom that GPIO drivers (GPIO chips) are also providing interrupts, |
| 209 | most often cascaded off a parent interrupt controller, and in some special |
| 210 | cases the GPIO logic is melded with a SoC's primary interrupt controller. |
| 211 | |
| 212 | The IRQ portions of the GPIO block are implemented using an irqchip, using |
| 213 | the header <linux/irq.h>. So basically such a driver is utilizing two sub- |
| 214 | systems simultaneously: gpio and irq. |
| 215 | |
Linus Walleij | d245b3f | 2016-11-24 10:57:25 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 216 | RT_FULL: a realtime compliant GPIO driver should not use spinlock_t or any |
| 217 | sleepable APIs (like PM runtime) as part of its irq_chip implementation. |
Grygorii Strashko | c307b00 | 2015-10-20 17:22:15 +0300 | [diff] [blame] | 218 | - spinlock_t should be replaced with raw_spinlock_t [1]. |
| 219 | - If sleepable APIs have to be used, these can be done from the .irq_bus_lock() |
| 220 | and .irq_bus_unlock() callbacks, as these are the only slowpath callbacks |
| 221 | on an irqchip. Create the callbacks if needed [2]. |
| 222 | |
Linus Walleij | 90887db | 2014-04-09 14:36:32 +0200 | [diff] [blame] | 223 | GPIO irqchips usually fall in one of two categories: |
| 224 | |
| 225 | * CHAINED GPIO irqchips: these are usually the type that is embedded on |
Linus Walleij | d245b3f | 2016-11-24 10:57:25 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 226 | an SoC. This means that there is a fast IRQ flow handler for the GPIOs that |
Linus Walleij | 90887db | 2014-04-09 14:36:32 +0200 | [diff] [blame] | 227 | gets called in a chain from the parent IRQ handler, most typically the |
Linus Walleij | d245b3f | 2016-11-24 10:57:25 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 228 | system interrupt controller. This means that the GPIO irqchip handler will |
| 229 | be called immediately from the parent irqchip, while holding the IRQs |
| 230 | disabled. The GPIO irqchip will then end up calling something like this |
| 231 | sequence in its interrupt handler: |
Linus Walleij | 90887db | 2014-04-09 14:36:32 +0200 | [diff] [blame] | 232 | |
Linus Walleij | d245b3f | 2016-11-24 10:57:25 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 233 | static irqreturn_t foo_gpio_irq(int irq, void *data) |
Linus Walleij | 90887db | 2014-04-09 14:36:32 +0200 | [diff] [blame] | 234 | chained_irq_enter(...); |
| 235 | generic_handle_irq(...); |
| 236 | chained_irq_exit(...); |
| 237 | |
| 238 | Chained GPIO irqchips typically can NOT set the .can_sleep flag on |
Linus Walleij | d245b3f | 2016-11-24 10:57:25 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 239 | struct gpio_chip, as everything happens directly in the callbacks: no |
| 240 | slow bus traffic like I2C can be used. |
Linus Walleij | 90887db | 2014-04-09 14:36:32 +0200 | [diff] [blame] | 241 | |
Grygorii Strashko | c307b00 | 2015-10-20 17:22:15 +0300 | [diff] [blame] | 242 | RT_FULL: Note, chained IRQ handlers will not be forced threaded on -RT. |
| 243 | As result, spinlock_t or any sleepable APIs (like PM runtime) can't be used |
| 244 | in chained IRQ handler. |
Linus Walleij | d245b3f | 2016-11-24 10:57:25 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 245 | If required (and if it can't be converted to the nested threaded GPIO irqchip) |
| 246 | a chained IRQ handler can be converted to generic irq handler and this way |
| 247 | it will be a threaded IRQ handler on -RT and a hard IRQ handler on non-RT |
Grygorii Strashko | c307b00 | 2015-10-20 17:22:15 +0300 | [diff] [blame] | 248 | (for example, see [3]). |
| 249 | Know W/A: The generic_handle_irq() is expected to be called with IRQ disabled, |
Linus Walleij | d245b3f | 2016-11-24 10:57:25 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 250 | so the IRQ core will complain if it is called from an IRQ handler which is |
| 251 | forced to a thread. The "fake?" raw lock can be used to W/A this problem: |
Grygorii Strashko | c307b00 | 2015-10-20 17:22:15 +0300 | [diff] [blame] | 252 | |
| 253 | raw_spinlock_t wa_lock; |
| 254 | static irqreturn_t omap_gpio_irq_handler(int irq, void *gpiobank) |
| 255 | unsigned long wa_lock_flags; |
| 256 | raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&bank->wa_lock, wa_lock_flags); |
| 257 | generic_handle_irq(irq_find_mapping(bank->chip.irqdomain, bit)); |
| 258 | raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bank->wa_lock, wa_lock_flags); |
| 259 | |
| 260 | * GENERIC CHAINED GPIO irqchips: these are the same as "CHAINED GPIO irqchips", |
| 261 | but chained IRQ handlers are not used. Instead GPIO IRQs dispatching is |
| 262 | performed by generic IRQ handler which is configured using request_irq(). |
| 263 | The GPIO irqchip will then end up calling something like this sequence in |
| 264 | its interrupt handler: |
| 265 | |
| 266 | static irqreturn_t gpio_rcar_irq_handler(int irq, void *dev_id) |
| 267 | for each detected GPIO IRQ |
| 268 | generic_handle_irq(...); |
| 269 | |
| 270 | RT_FULL: Such kind of handlers will be forced threaded on -RT, as result IRQ |
| 271 | core will complain that generic_handle_irq() is called with IRQ enabled and |
| 272 | the same W/A as for "CHAINED GPIO irqchips" can be applied. |
| 273 | |
Linus Walleij | 4aa50b8 | 2015-10-27 11:13:18 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 274 | * NESTED THREADED GPIO irqchips: these are off-chip GPIO expanders and any |
| 275 | other GPIO irqchip residing on the other side of a sleeping bus. Of course |
| 276 | such drivers that need slow bus traffic to read out IRQ status and similar, |
| 277 | traffic which may in turn incur other IRQs to happen, cannot be handled |
| 278 | in a quick IRQ handler with IRQs disabled. Instead they need to spawn a |
| 279 | thread and then mask the parent IRQ line until the interrupt is handled |
| 280 | by the driver. The hallmark of this driver is to call something like |
| 281 | this in its interrupt handler: |
Linus Walleij | 90887db | 2014-04-09 14:36:32 +0200 | [diff] [blame] | 282 | |
Linus Walleij | d245b3f | 2016-11-24 10:57:25 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 283 | static irqreturn_t foo_gpio_irq(int irq, void *data) |
Linus Walleij | 90887db | 2014-04-09 14:36:32 +0200 | [diff] [blame] | 284 | ... |
| 285 | handle_nested_irq(irq); |
| 286 | |
Linus Walleij | 4aa50b8 | 2015-10-27 11:13:18 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 287 | The hallmark of threaded GPIO irqchips is that they set the .can_sleep |
| 288 | flag on struct gpio_chip to true, indicating that this chip may sleep |
| 289 | when accessing the GPIOs. |
Linus Walleij | 90887db | 2014-04-09 14:36:32 +0200 | [diff] [blame] | 290 | |
| 291 | To help out in handling the set-up and management of GPIO irqchips and the |
| 292 | associated irqdomain and resource allocation callbacks, the gpiolib has |
| 293 | some helpers that can be enabled by selecting the GPIOLIB_IRQCHIP Kconfig |
| 294 | symbol: |
| 295 | |
Linus Walleij | d245b3f | 2016-11-24 10:57:25 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 296 | * gpiochip_irqchip_add(): adds a chained irqchip to a gpiochip. It will pass |
Linus Walleij | 90887db | 2014-04-09 14:36:32 +0200 | [diff] [blame] | 297 | the struct gpio_chip* for the chip to all IRQ callbacks, so the callbacks |
| 298 | need to embed the gpio_chip in its state container and obtain a pointer |
| 299 | to the container using container_of(). |
| 300 | (See Documentation/driver-model/design-patterns.txt) |
| 301 | |
Linus Walleij | d245b3f | 2016-11-24 10:57:25 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 302 | * gpiochip_irqchip_add_nested(): adds a nested irqchip to a gpiochip. |
| 303 | Apart from that it works exactly like the chained irqchip. |
Mika Westerberg | 79b804c | 2016-09-20 15:15:21 +0300 | [diff] [blame] | 304 | |
Linus Walleij | 90887db | 2014-04-09 14:36:32 +0200 | [diff] [blame] | 305 | * gpiochip_set_chained_irqchip(): sets up a chained irq handler for a |
| 306 | gpio_chip from a parent IRQ and passes the struct gpio_chip* as handler |
| 307 | data. (Notice handler data, since the irqchip data is likely used by the |
Linus Walleij | d245b3f | 2016-11-24 10:57:25 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 308 | parent irqchip!). |
| 309 | |
| 310 | * gpiochip_set_nested_irqchip(): sets up a nested irq handler for a |
| 311 | gpio_chip from a parent IRQ. As the parent IRQ has usually been |
| 312 | explicitly requested by the driver, this does very little more than |
| 313 | mark all the child IRQs as having the other IRQ as parent. |
| 314 | |
| 315 | If there is a need to exclude certain GPIOs from the IRQ domain, you can |
| 316 | set .irq_need_valid_mask of the gpiochip before gpiochip_add_data() is |
| 317 | called. This allocates an .irq_valid_mask with as many bits set as there |
| 318 | are GPIOs in the chip. Drivers can exclude GPIOs by clearing bits from this |
| 319 | mask. The mask must be filled in before gpiochip_irqchip_add() or |
| 320 | gpiochip_irqchip_add_nested() is called. |
Linus Walleij | 90887db | 2014-04-09 14:36:32 +0200 | [diff] [blame] | 321 | |
| 322 | To use the helpers please keep the following in mind: |
| 323 | |
| 324 | - Make sure to assign all relevant members of the struct gpio_chip so that |
| 325 | the irqchip can initialize. E.g. .dev and .can_sleep shall be set up |
| 326 | properly. |
| 327 | |
Grygorii Strashko | c307b00 | 2015-10-20 17:22:15 +0300 | [diff] [blame] | 328 | - Nominally set all handlers to handle_bad_irq() in the setup call and pass |
| 329 | handle_bad_irq() as flow handler parameter in gpiochip_irqchip_add() if it is |
| 330 | expected for GPIO driver that irqchip .set_type() callback have to be called |
| 331 | before using/enabling GPIO IRQ. Then set the handler to handle_level_irq() |
| 332 | and/or handle_edge_irq() in the irqchip .set_type() callback depending on |
| 333 | what your controller supports. |
| 334 | |
Linus Walleij | 99adc05 | 2014-01-22 15:00:55 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 335 | It is legal for any IRQ consumer to request an IRQ from any irqchip no matter |
| 336 | if that is a combined GPIO+IRQ driver. The basic premise is that gpio_chip and |
| 337 | irq_chip are orthogonal, and offering their services independent of each |
| 338 | other. |
| 339 | |
| 340 | gpiod_to_irq() is just a convenience function to figure out the IRQ for a |
| 341 | certain GPIO line and should not be relied upon to have been called before |
| 342 | the IRQ is used. |
| 343 | |
| 344 | So always prepare the hardware and make it ready for action in respective |
| 345 | callbacks from the GPIO and irqchip APIs. Do not rely on gpiod_to_irq() having |
| 346 | been called first. |
| 347 | |
| 348 | This orthogonality leads to ambiguities that we need to solve: if there is |
| 349 | competition inside the subsystem which side is using the resource (a certain |
| 350 | GPIO line and register for example) it needs to deny certain operations and |
| 351 | keep track of usage inside of the gpiolib subsystem. This is why the API |
| 352 | below exists. |
| 353 | |
| 354 | |
Alexandre Courbot | fd8e198 | 2013-11-16 21:34:21 +0900 | [diff] [blame] | 355 | Locking IRQ usage |
| 356 | ----------------- |
| 357 | Input GPIOs can be used as IRQ signals. When this happens, a driver is requested |
| 358 | to mark the GPIO as being used as an IRQ: |
| 359 | |
Alexandre Courbot | e3a2e87 | 2014-10-23 17:27:07 +0900 | [diff] [blame] | 360 | int gpiochip_lock_as_irq(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int offset) |
Alexandre Courbot | fd8e198 | 2013-11-16 21:34:21 +0900 | [diff] [blame] | 361 | |
| 362 | This will prevent the use of non-irq related GPIO APIs until the GPIO IRQ lock |
| 363 | is released: |
| 364 | |
Alexandre Courbot | e3a2e87 | 2014-10-23 17:27:07 +0900 | [diff] [blame] | 365 | void gpiochip_unlock_as_irq(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int offset) |
Linus Walleij | 99adc05 | 2014-01-22 15:00:55 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 366 | |
| 367 | When implementing an irqchip inside a GPIO driver, these two functions should |
| 368 | typically be called in the .startup() and .shutdown() callbacks from the |
| 369 | irqchip. |
Guenter Roeck | f7d4ad9 | 2014-07-22 08:01:01 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 370 | |
Linus Walleij | d245b3f | 2016-11-24 10:57:25 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 371 | When using the gpiolib irqchip helpers, these callback are automatically |
| 372 | assigned. |
| 373 | |
Grygorii Strashko | c307b00 | 2015-10-20 17:22:15 +0300 | [diff] [blame] | 374 | Real-Time compliance for GPIO IRQ chips |
| 375 | --------------------------------------- |
| 376 | |
| 377 | Any provider of irqchips needs to be carefully tailored to support Real Time |
Masanari Iida | 547d4c1 | 2015-11-16 20:00:35 +0900 | [diff] [blame] | 378 | preemption. It is desirable that all irqchips in the GPIO subsystem keep this |
Grygorii Strashko | c307b00 | 2015-10-20 17:22:15 +0300 | [diff] [blame] | 379 | in mind and does the proper testing to assure they are real time-enabled. |
| 380 | So, pay attention on above " RT_FULL:" notes, please. |
| 381 | The following is a checklist to follow when preparing a driver for real |
| 382 | time-compliance: |
| 383 | |
| 384 | - ensure spinlock_t is not used as part irq_chip implementation; |
| 385 | - ensure that sleepable APIs are not used as part irq_chip implementation. |
| 386 | If sleepable APIs have to be used, these can be done from the .irq_bus_lock() |
| 387 | and .irq_bus_unlock() callbacks; |
| 388 | - Chained GPIO irqchips: ensure spinlock_t or any sleepable APIs are not used |
| 389 | from chained IRQ handler; |
| 390 | - Generic chained GPIO irqchips: take care about generic_handle_irq() calls and |
| 391 | apply corresponding W/A; |
| 392 | - Chained GPIO irqchips: get rid of chained IRQ handler and use generic irq |
| 393 | handler if possible :) |
| 394 | - regmap_mmio: Sry, but you are in trouble :( if MMIO regmap is used as for |
| 395 | GPIO IRQ chip implementation; |
| 396 | - Test your driver with the appropriate in-kernel real time test cases for both |
| 397 | level and edge IRQs. |
| 398 | |
Guenter Roeck | f7d4ad9 | 2014-07-22 08:01:01 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 399 | |
| 400 | Requesting self-owned GPIO pins |
| 401 | ------------------------------- |
| 402 | |
| 403 | Sometimes it is useful to allow a GPIO chip driver to request its own GPIO |
| 404 | descriptors through the gpiolib API. Using gpio_request() for this purpose |
| 405 | does not help since it pins the module to the kernel forever (it calls |
| 406 | try_module_get()). A GPIO driver can use the following functions instead |
| 407 | to request and free descriptors without being pinned to the kernel forever. |
| 408 | |
Alexandre Courbot | abdc08a | 2014-08-19 10:06:09 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 409 | struct gpio_desc *gpiochip_request_own_desc(struct gpio_desc *desc, |
| 410 | const char *label) |
Guenter Roeck | f7d4ad9 | 2014-07-22 08:01:01 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 411 | |
| 412 | void gpiochip_free_own_desc(struct gpio_desc *desc) |
| 413 | |
| 414 | Descriptors requested with gpiochip_request_own_desc() must be released with |
| 415 | gpiochip_free_own_desc(). |
| 416 | |
| 417 | These functions must be used with care since they do not affect module use |
| 418 | count. Do not use the functions to request gpio descriptors not owned by the |
| 419 | calling driver. |
Grygorii Strashko | c307b00 | 2015-10-20 17:22:15 +0300 | [diff] [blame] | 420 | |
| 421 | [1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-omap/msg120425.html |
| 422 | [2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/9/25/494 |
| 423 | [3] https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/9/25/495 |