Simo Sorce | 030d794 | 2012-05-25 18:09:56 -0400 | [diff] [blame] | 1 | |
| 2 | rpcsec_gss support for kernel RPC servers |
| 3 | ========================================= |
| 4 | |
| 5 | This document gives references to the standards and protocols used to |
| 6 | implement RPCGSS authentication in kernel RPC servers such as the NFS |
| 7 | server and the NFS client's NFSv4.0 callback server. (But note that |
| 8 | NFSv4.1 and higher don't require the client to act as a server for the |
| 9 | purposes of authentication.) |
| 10 | |
| 11 | RPCGSS is specified in a few IETF documents: |
| 12 | - RFC2203 v1: http://tools.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2203.txt |
| 13 | - RFC5403 v2: http://tools.ietf.org/rfc/rfc5403.txt |
| 14 | and there is a 3rd version being proposed: |
| 15 | - http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-williams-rpcsecgssv3.txt |
| 16 | (At draft n. 02 at the time of writing) |
| 17 | |
| 18 | Background |
| 19 | ---------- |
| 20 | |
| 21 | The RPCGSS Authentication method describes a way to perform GSSAPI |
| 22 | Authentication for NFS. Although GSSAPI is itself completely mechanism |
| 23 | agnostic, in many cases only the KRB5 mechanism is supported by NFS |
| 24 | implementations. |
| 25 | |
| 26 | The Linux kernel, at the moment, supports only the KRB5 mechanism, and |
| 27 | depends on GSSAPI extensions that are KRB5 specific. |
| 28 | |
| 29 | GSSAPI is a complex library, and implementing it completely in kernel is |
| 30 | unwarranted. However GSSAPI operations are fundementally separable in 2 |
| 31 | parts: |
| 32 | - initial context establishment |
| 33 | - integrity/privacy protection (signing and encrypting of individual |
| 34 | packets) |
| 35 | |
| 36 | The former is more complex and policy-independent, but less |
| 37 | performance-sensitive. The latter is simpler and needs to be very fast. |
| 38 | |
| 39 | Therefore, we perform per-packet integrity and privacy protection in the |
| 40 | kernel, but leave the initial context establishment to userspace. We |
| 41 | need upcalls to request userspace to perform context establishment. |
| 42 | |
| 43 | NFS Server Legacy Upcall Mechanism |
| 44 | ---------------------------------- |
| 45 | |
| 46 | The classic upcall mechanism uses a custom text based upcall mechanism |
| 47 | to talk to a custom daemon called rpc.svcgssd that is provide by the |
| 48 | nfs-utils package. |
| 49 | |
| 50 | This upcall mechanism has 2 limitations: |
| 51 | |
| 52 | A) It can handle tokens that are no bigger than 2KiB |
| 53 | |
| 54 | In some Kerberos deployment GSSAPI tokens can be quite big, up and |
| 55 | beyond 64KiB in size due to various authorization extensions attacked to |
| 56 | the Kerberos tickets, that needs to be sent through the GSS layer in |
| 57 | order to perform context establishment. |
| 58 | |
| 59 | B) It does not properly handle creds where the user is member of more |
| 60 | than a few housand groups (the current hard limit in the kernel is 65K |
| 61 | groups) due to limitation on the size of the buffer that can be send |
| 62 | back to the kernel (4KiB). |
| 63 | |
| 64 | NFS Server New RPC Upcall Mechanism |
| 65 | ----------------------------------- |
| 66 | |
| 67 | The newer upcall mechanism uses RPC over a unix socket to a daemon |
| 68 | called gss-proxy, implemented by a userspace program called Gssproxy. |
| 69 | |
| 70 | The gss_proxy RPC protocol is currently documented here: |
| 71 | |
| 72 | https://fedorahosted.org/gss-proxy/wiki/ProtocolDocumentation |
| 73 | |
| 74 | This upcall mechanism uses the kernel rpc client and connects to the gssproxy |
| 75 | userspace program over a regular unix socket. The gssproxy protocol does not |
| 76 | suffer from the size limitations of the legacy protocol. |
| 77 | |
| 78 | Negotiating Upcall Mechanisms |
| 79 | ----------------------------- |
| 80 | |
| 81 | To provide backward compatibility, the kernel defaults to using the |
| 82 | legacy mechanism. To switch to the new mechanism, gss-proxy must bind |
| 83 | to /var/run/gssproxy.sock and then write "1" to |
| 84 | /proc/net/rpc/use-gss-proxy. If gss-proxy dies, it must repeat both |
| 85 | steps. |
| 86 | |
| 87 | Once the upcall mechanism is chosen, it cannot be changed. To prevent |
| 88 | locking into the legacy mechanisms, the above steps must be performed |
| 89 | before starting nfsd. Whoever starts nfsd can guarantee this by reading |
| 90 | from /proc/net/rpc/use-gss-proxy and checking that it contains a |
| 91 | "1"--the read will block until gss-proxy has done its write to the file. |