blob: 184193bcb262ac908f1f5a7a7c2c662dec0ea4b8 [file] [log] [blame]
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001================
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05002Control Group v2
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03003================
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05004
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03005:Date: October, 2015
6:Author: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05007
8This is the authoritative documentation on the design, interface and
9conventions of cgroup v2. It describes all userland-visible aspects
10of cgroup including core and specific controller behaviors. All
11future changes must be reflected in this document. Documentation for
W. Trevor King9a2ddda2016-01-27 13:01:52 -080012v1 is available under Documentation/cgroup-v1/.
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -050013
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -030014.. CONTENTS
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -050015
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -030016 1. Introduction
17 1-1. Terminology
18 1-2. What is cgroup?
19 2. Basic Operations
20 2-1. Mounting
Tejun Heo8cfd8142017-07-21 11:14:51 -040021 2-2. Organizing Processes and Threads
22 2-2-1. Processes
23 2-2-2. Threads
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -030024 2-3. [Un]populated Notification
25 2-4. Controlling Controllers
26 2-4-1. Enabling and Disabling
27 2-4-2. Top-down Constraint
28 2-4-3. No Internal Process Constraint
29 2-5. Delegation
30 2-5-1. Model of Delegation
31 2-5-2. Delegation Containment
32 2-6. Guidelines
33 2-6-1. Organize Once and Control
34 2-6-2. Avoid Name Collisions
35 3. Resource Distribution Models
36 3-1. Weights
37 3-2. Limits
38 3-3. Protections
39 3-4. Allocations
40 4. Interface Files
41 4-1. Format
42 4-2. Conventions
43 4-3. Core Interface Files
44 5. Controllers
45 5-1. CPU
46 5-1-1. CPU Interface Files
47 5-2. Memory
48 5-2-1. Memory Interface Files
49 5-2-2. Usage Guidelines
50 5-2-3. Memory Ownership
51 5-3. IO
52 5-3-1. IO Interface Files
53 5-3-2. Writeback
Josef Bacikb351f0c2018-07-03 11:15:02 -040054 5-3-3. IO Latency
55 5-3-3-1. How IO Latency Throttling Works
56 5-3-3-2. IO Latency Interface Files
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -030057 5-4. PID
58 5-4-1. PID Interface Files
Roman Gushchin4ad5a322017-12-13 19:49:03 +000059 5-5. Device
60 5-6. RDMA
61 5-6-1. RDMA Interface Files
62 5-7. Misc
63 5-7-1. perf_event
Maciej S. Szmigieroc4e08422018-01-10 23:33:19 +010064 5-N. Non-normative information
65 5-N-1. CPU controller root cgroup process behaviour
66 5-N-2. IO controller root cgroup process behaviour
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -030067 6. Namespace
68 6-1. Basics
69 6-2. The Root and Views
70 6-3. Migration and setns(2)
71 6-4. Interaction with Other Namespaces
72 P. Information on Kernel Programming
73 P-1. Filesystem Support for Writeback
74 D. Deprecated v1 Core Features
75 R. Issues with v1 and Rationales for v2
76 R-1. Multiple Hierarchies
77 R-2. Thread Granularity
78 R-3. Competition Between Inner Nodes and Threads
79 R-4. Other Interface Issues
80 R-5. Controller Issues and Remedies
81 R-5-1. Memory
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -050082
83
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -030084Introduction
85============
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -050086
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -030087Terminology
88-----------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -050089
90"cgroup" stands for "control group" and is never capitalized. The
91singular form is used to designate the whole feature and also as a
92qualifier as in "cgroup controllers". When explicitly referring to
93multiple individual control groups, the plural form "cgroups" is used.
94
95
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -030096What is cgroup?
97---------------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -050098
99cgroup is a mechanism to organize processes hierarchically and
100distribute system resources along the hierarchy in a controlled and
101configurable manner.
102
103cgroup is largely composed of two parts - the core and controllers.
104cgroup core is primarily responsible for hierarchically organizing
105processes. A cgroup controller is usually responsible for
106distributing a specific type of system resource along the hierarchy
107although there are utility controllers which serve purposes other than
108resource distribution.
109
110cgroups form a tree structure and every process in the system belongs
111to one and only one cgroup. All threads of a process belong to the
112same cgroup. On creation, all processes are put in the cgroup that
113the parent process belongs to at the time. A process can be migrated
114to another cgroup. Migration of a process doesn't affect already
115existing descendant processes.
116
117Following certain structural constraints, controllers may be enabled or
118disabled selectively on a cgroup. All controller behaviors are
119hierarchical - if a controller is enabled on a cgroup, it affects all
120processes which belong to the cgroups consisting the inclusive
121sub-hierarchy of the cgroup. When a controller is enabled on a nested
122cgroup, it always restricts the resource distribution further. The
123restrictions set closer to the root in the hierarchy can not be
124overridden from further away.
125
126
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300127Basic Operations
128================
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500129
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300130Mounting
131--------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500132
133Unlike v1, cgroup v2 has only single hierarchy. The cgroup v2
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300134hierarchy can be mounted with the following mount command::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500135
136 # mount -t cgroup2 none $MOUNT_POINT
137
138cgroup2 filesystem has the magic number 0x63677270 ("cgrp"). All
139controllers which support v2 and are not bound to a v1 hierarchy are
140automatically bound to the v2 hierarchy and show up at the root.
141Controllers which are not in active use in the v2 hierarchy can be
142bound to other hierarchies. This allows mixing v2 hierarchy with the
143legacy v1 multiple hierarchies in a fully backward compatible way.
144
145A controller can be moved across hierarchies only after the controller
146is no longer referenced in its current hierarchy. Because per-cgroup
147controller states are destroyed asynchronously and controllers may
148have lingering references, a controller may not show up immediately on
149the v2 hierarchy after the final umount of the previous hierarchy.
150Similarly, a controller should be fully disabled to be moved out of
151the unified hierarchy and it may take some time for the disabled
152controller to become available for other hierarchies; furthermore, due
153to inter-controller dependencies, other controllers may need to be
154disabled too.
155
156While useful for development and manual configurations, moving
157controllers dynamically between the v2 and other hierarchies is
158strongly discouraged for production use. It is recommended to decide
159the hierarchies and controller associations before starting using the
160controllers after system boot.
161
Johannes Weiner1619b6d2016-02-16 13:21:14 -0500162During transition to v2, system management software might still
163automount the v1 cgroup filesystem and so hijack all controllers
164during boot, before manual intervention is possible. To make testing
165and experimenting easier, the kernel parameter cgroup_no_v1= allows
166disabling controllers in v1 and make them always available in v2.
167
Tejun Heo5136f632017-06-27 14:30:28 -0400168cgroup v2 currently supports the following mount options.
169
170 nsdelegate
171
172 Consider cgroup namespaces as delegation boundaries. This
173 option is system wide and can only be set on mount or modified
174 through remount from the init namespace. The mount option is
175 ignored on non-init namespace mounts. Please refer to the
176 Delegation section for details.
177
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500178
Tejun Heo8cfd8142017-07-21 11:14:51 -0400179Organizing Processes and Threads
180--------------------------------
181
182Processes
183~~~~~~~~~
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500184
185Initially, only the root cgroup exists to which all processes belong.
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300186A child cgroup can be created by creating a sub-directory::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500187
188 # mkdir $CGROUP_NAME
189
190A given cgroup may have multiple child cgroups forming a tree
191structure. Each cgroup has a read-writable interface file
192"cgroup.procs". When read, it lists the PIDs of all processes which
193belong to the cgroup one-per-line. The PIDs are not ordered and the
194same PID may show up more than once if the process got moved to
195another cgroup and then back or the PID got recycled while reading.
196
197A process can be migrated into a cgroup by writing its PID to the
198target cgroup's "cgroup.procs" file. Only one process can be migrated
199on a single write(2) call. If a process is composed of multiple
200threads, writing the PID of any thread migrates all threads of the
201process.
202
203When a process forks a child process, the new process is born into the
204cgroup that the forking process belongs to at the time of the
205operation. After exit, a process stays associated with the cgroup
206that it belonged to at the time of exit until it's reaped; however, a
207zombie process does not appear in "cgroup.procs" and thus can't be
208moved to another cgroup.
209
210A cgroup which doesn't have any children or live processes can be
211destroyed by removing the directory. Note that a cgroup which doesn't
212have any children and is associated only with zombie processes is
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300213considered empty and can be removed::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500214
215 # rmdir $CGROUP_NAME
216
217"/proc/$PID/cgroup" lists a process's cgroup membership. If legacy
218cgroup is in use in the system, this file may contain multiple lines,
219one for each hierarchy. The entry for cgroup v2 is always in the
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300220format "0::$PATH"::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500221
222 # cat /proc/842/cgroup
223 ...
224 0::/test-cgroup/test-cgroup-nested
225
226If the process becomes a zombie and the cgroup it was associated with
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300227is removed subsequently, " (deleted)" is appended to the path::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500228
229 # cat /proc/842/cgroup
230 ...
231 0::/test-cgroup/test-cgroup-nested (deleted)
232
233
Tejun Heo8cfd8142017-07-21 11:14:51 -0400234Threads
235~~~~~~~
236
237cgroup v2 supports thread granularity for a subset of controllers to
238support use cases requiring hierarchical resource distribution across
239the threads of a group of processes. By default, all threads of a
240process belong to the same cgroup, which also serves as the resource
241domain to host resource consumptions which are not specific to a
242process or thread. The thread mode allows threads to be spread across
243a subtree while still maintaining the common resource domain for them.
244
245Controllers which support thread mode are called threaded controllers.
246The ones which don't are called domain controllers.
247
248Marking a cgroup threaded makes it join the resource domain of its
249parent as a threaded cgroup. The parent may be another threaded
250cgroup whose resource domain is further up in the hierarchy. The root
251of a threaded subtree, that is, the nearest ancestor which is not
252threaded, is called threaded domain or thread root interchangeably and
253serves as the resource domain for the entire subtree.
254
255Inside a threaded subtree, threads of a process can be put in
256different cgroups and are not subject to the no internal process
257constraint - threaded controllers can be enabled on non-leaf cgroups
258whether they have threads in them or not.
259
260As the threaded domain cgroup hosts all the domain resource
261consumptions of the subtree, it is considered to have internal
262resource consumptions whether there are processes in it or not and
263can't have populated child cgroups which aren't threaded. Because the
264root cgroup is not subject to no internal process constraint, it can
265serve both as a threaded domain and a parent to domain cgroups.
266
267The current operation mode or type of the cgroup is shown in the
268"cgroup.type" file which indicates whether the cgroup is a normal
269domain, a domain which is serving as the domain of a threaded subtree,
270or a threaded cgroup.
271
272On creation, a cgroup is always a domain cgroup and can be made
273threaded by writing "threaded" to the "cgroup.type" file. The
274operation is single direction::
275
276 # echo threaded > cgroup.type
277
278Once threaded, the cgroup can't be made a domain again. To enable the
279thread mode, the following conditions must be met.
280
281- As the cgroup will join the parent's resource domain. The parent
282 must either be a valid (threaded) domain or a threaded cgroup.
283
Tejun Heo918a8c22017-07-23 08:18:26 -0400284- When the parent is an unthreaded domain, it must not have any domain
285 controllers enabled or populated domain children. The root is
286 exempt from this requirement.
Tejun Heo8cfd8142017-07-21 11:14:51 -0400287
288Topology-wise, a cgroup can be in an invalid state. Please consider
Vladimir Rutsky2877cbe2018-01-02 17:27:41 +0100289the following topology::
Tejun Heo8cfd8142017-07-21 11:14:51 -0400290
291 A (threaded domain) - B (threaded) - C (domain, just created)
292
293C is created as a domain but isn't connected to a parent which can
294host child domains. C can't be used until it is turned into a
295threaded cgroup. "cgroup.type" file will report "domain (invalid)" in
296these cases. Operations which fail due to invalid topology use
297EOPNOTSUPP as the errno.
298
299A domain cgroup is turned into a threaded domain when one of its child
300cgroup becomes threaded or threaded controllers are enabled in the
301"cgroup.subtree_control" file while there are processes in the cgroup.
302A threaded domain reverts to a normal domain when the conditions
303clear.
304
305When read, "cgroup.threads" contains the list of the thread IDs of all
306threads in the cgroup. Except that the operations are per-thread
307instead of per-process, "cgroup.threads" has the same format and
308behaves the same way as "cgroup.procs". While "cgroup.threads" can be
309written to in any cgroup, as it can only move threads inside the same
310threaded domain, its operations are confined inside each threaded
311subtree.
312
313The threaded domain cgroup serves as the resource domain for the whole
314subtree, and, while the threads can be scattered across the subtree,
315all the processes are considered to be in the threaded domain cgroup.
316"cgroup.procs" in a threaded domain cgroup contains the PIDs of all
317processes in the subtree and is not readable in the subtree proper.
318However, "cgroup.procs" can be written to from anywhere in the subtree
319to migrate all threads of the matching process to the cgroup.
320
321Only threaded controllers can be enabled in a threaded subtree. When
322a threaded controller is enabled inside a threaded subtree, it only
323accounts for and controls resource consumptions associated with the
324threads in the cgroup and its descendants. All consumptions which
325aren't tied to a specific thread belong to the threaded domain cgroup.
326
327Because a threaded subtree is exempt from no internal process
328constraint, a threaded controller must be able to handle competition
329between threads in a non-leaf cgroup and its child cgroups. Each
330threaded controller defines how such competitions are handled.
331
332
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300333[Un]populated Notification
334--------------------------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500335
336Each non-root cgroup has a "cgroup.events" file which contains
337"populated" field indicating whether the cgroup's sub-hierarchy has
338live processes in it. Its value is 0 if there is no live process in
339the cgroup and its descendants; otherwise, 1. poll and [id]notify
340events are triggered when the value changes. This can be used, for
341example, to start a clean-up operation after all processes of a given
342sub-hierarchy have exited. The populated state updates and
343notifications are recursive. Consider the following sub-hierarchy
344where the numbers in the parentheses represent the numbers of processes
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300345in each cgroup::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500346
347 A(4) - B(0) - C(1)
348 \ D(0)
349
350A, B and C's "populated" fields would be 1 while D's 0. After the one
351process in C exits, B and C's "populated" fields would flip to "0" and
352file modified events will be generated on the "cgroup.events" files of
353both cgroups.
354
355
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300356Controlling Controllers
357-----------------------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500358
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300359Enabling and Disabling
360~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500361
362Each cgroup has a "cgroup.controllers" file which lists all
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300363controllers available for the cgroup to enable::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500364
365 # cat cgroup.controllers
366 cpu io memory
367
368No controller is enabled by default. Controllers can be enabled and
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300369disabled by writing to the "cgroup.subtree_control" file::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500370
371 # echo "+cpu +memory -io" > cgroup.subtree_control
372
373Only controllers which are listed in "cgroup.controllers" can be
374enabled. When multiple operations are specified as above, either they
375all succeed or fail. If multiple operations on the same controller
376are specified, the last one is effective.
377
378Enabling a controller in a cgroup indicates that the distribution of
379the target resource across its immediate children will be controlled.
380Consider the following sub-hierarchy. The enabled controllers are
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300381listed in parentheses::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500382
383 A(cpu,memory) - B(memory) - C()
384 \ D()
385
386As A has "cpu" and "memory" enabled, A will control the distribution
387of CPU cycles and memory to its children, in this case, B. As B has
388"memory" enabled but not "CPU", C and D will compete freely on CPU
389cycles but their division of memory available to B will be controlled.
390
391As a controller regulates the distribution of the target resource to
392the cgroup's children, enabling it creates the controller's interface
393files in the child cgroups. In the above example, enabling "cpu" on B
394would create the "cpu." prefixed controller interface files in C and
395D. Likewise, disabling "memory" from B would remove the "memory."
396prefixed controller interface files from C and D. This means that the
397controller interface files - anything which doesn't start with
398"cgroup." are owned by the parent rather than the cgroup itself.
399
400
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300401Top-down Constraint
402~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500403
404Resources are distributed top-down and a cgroup can further distribute
405a resource only if the resource has been distributed to it from the
406parent. This means that all non-root "cgroup.subtree_control" files
407can only contain controllers which are enabled in the parent's
408"cgroup.subtree_control" file. A controller can be enabled only if
409the parent has the controller enabled and a controller can't be
410disabled if one or more children have it enabled.
411
412
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300413No Internal Process Constraint
414~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500415
Tejun Heo8cfd8142017-07-21 11:14:51 -0400416Non-root cgroups can distribute domain resources to their children
417only when they don't have any processes of their own. In other words,
418only domain cgroups which don't contain any processes can have domain
419controllers enabled in their "cgroup.subtree_control" files.
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500420
Tejun Heo8cfd8142017-07-21 11:14:51 -0400421This guarantees that, when a domain controller is looking at the part
422of the hierarchy which has it enabled, processes are always only on
423the leaves. This rules out situations where child cgroups compete
424against internal processes of the parent.
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500425
426The root cgroup is exempt from this restriction. Root contains
427processes and anonymous resource consumption which can't be associated
428with any other cgroups and requires special treatment from most
429controllers. How resource consumption in the root cgroup is governed
Maciej S. Szmigieroc4e08422018-01-10 23:33:19 +0100430is up to each controller (for more information on this topic please
431refer to the Non-normative information section in the Controllers
432chapter).
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500433
434Note that the restriction doesn't get in the way if there is no
435enabled controller in the cgroup's "cgroup.subtree_control". This is
436important as otherwise it wouldn't be possible to create children of a
437populated cgroup. To control resource distribution of a cgroup, the
438cgroup must create children and transfer all its processes to the
439children before enabling controllers in its "cgroup.subtree_control"
440file.
441
442
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300443Delegation
444----------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500445
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300446Model of Delegation
447~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500448
Tejun Heo5136f632017-06-27 14:30:28 -0400449A cgroup can be delegated in two ways. First, to a less privileged
Tejun Heo8cfd8142017-07-21 11:14:51 -0400450user by granting write access of the directory and its "cgroup.procs",
451"cgroup.threads" and "cgroup.subtree_control" files to the user.
452Second, if the "nsdelegate" mount option is set, automatically to a
453cgroup namespace on namespace creation.
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500454
Tejun Heo5136f632017-06-27 14:30:28 -0400455Because the resource control interface files in a given directory
456control the distribution of the parent's resources, the delegatee
457shouldn't be allowed to write to them. For the first method, this is
458achieved by not granting access to these files. For the second, the
459kernel rejects writes to all files other than "cgroup.procs" and
460"cgroup.subtree_control" on a namespace root from inside the
461namespace.
462
463The end results are equivalent for both delegation types. Once
464delegated, the user can build sub-hierarchy under the directory,
465organize processes inside it as it sees fit and further distribute the
466resources it received from the parent. The limits and other settings
467of all resource controllers are hierarchical and regardless of what
468happens in the delegated sub-hierarchy, nothing can escape the
469resource restrictions imposed by the parent.
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500470
471Currently, cgroup doesn't impose any restrictions on the number of
472cgroups in or nesting depth of a delegated sub-hierarchy; however,
473this may be limited explicitly in the future.
474
475
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300476Delegation Containment
477~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500478
479A delegated sub-hierarchy is contained in the sense that processes
Tejun Heo5136f632017-06-27 14:30:28 -0400480can't be moved into or out of the sub-hierarchy by the delegatee.
481
482For delegations to a less privileged user, this is achieved by
483requiring the following conditions for a process with a non-root euid
484to migrate a target process into a cgroup by writing its PID to the
485"cgroup.procs" file.
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500486
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500487- The writer must have write access to the "cgroup.procs" file.
488
489- The writer must have write access to the "cgroup.procs" file of the
490 common ancestor of the source and destination cgroups.
491
Tejun Heo576dd462017-01-20 11:29:54 -0500492The above two constraints ensure that while a delegatee may migrate
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500493processes around freely in the delegated sub-hierarchy it can't pull
494in from or push out to outside the sub-hierarchy.
495
496For an example, let's assume cgroups C0 and C1 have been delegated to
497user U0 who created C00, C01 under C0 and C10 under C1 as follows and
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300498all processes under C0 and C1 belong to U0::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500499
500 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ - C0 - C00
501 ~ cgroup ~ \ C01
502 ~ hierarchy ~
503 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ - C1 - C10
504
505Let's also say U0 wants to write the PID of a process which is
506currently in C10 into "C00/cgroup.procs". U0 has write access to the
Tejun Heo576dd462017-01-20 11:29:54 -0500507file; however, the common ancestor of the source cgroup C10 and the
508destination cgroup C00 is above the points of delegation and U0 would
509not have write access to its "cgroup.procs" files and thus the write
510will be denied with -EACCES.
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500511
Tejun Heo5136f632017-06-27 14:30:28 -0400512For delegations to namespaces, containment is achieved by requiring
513that both the source and destination cgroups are reachable from the
514namespace of the process which is attempting the migration. If either
515is not reachable, the migration is rejected with -ENOENT.
516
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500517
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300518Guidelines
519----------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500520
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300521Organize Once and Control
522~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500523
524Migrating a process across cgroups is a relatively expensive operation
525and stateful resources such as memory are not moved together with the
526process. This is an explicit design decision as there often exist
527inherent trade-offs between migration and various hot paths in terms
528of synchronization cost.
529
530As such, migrating processes across cgroups frequently as a means to
531apply different resource restrictions is discouraged. A workload
532should be assigned to a cgroup according to the system's logical and
533resource structure once on start-up. Dynamic adjustments to resource
534distribution can be made by changing controller configuration through
535the interface files.
536
537
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300538Avoid Name Collisions
539~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500540
541Interface files for a cgroup and its children cgroups occupy the same
542directory and it is possible to create children cgroups which collide
543with interface files.
544
545All cgroup core interface files are prefixed with "cgroup." and each
546controller's interface files are prefixed with the controller name and
547a dot. A controller's name is composed of lower case alphabets and
548'_'s but never begins with an '_' so it can be used as the prefix
549character for collision avoidance. Also, interface file names won't
550start or end with terms which are often used in categorizing workloads
551such as job, service, slice, unit or workload.
552
553cgroup doesn't do anything to prevent name collisions and it's the
554user's responsibility to avoid them.
555
556
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300557Resource Distribution Models
558============================
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500559
560cgroup controllers implement several resource distribution schemes
561depending on the resource type and expected use cases. This section
562describes major schemes in use along with their expected behaviors.
563
564
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300565Weights
566-------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500567
568A parent's resource is distributed by adding up the weights of all
569active children and giving each the fraction matching the ratio of its
570weight against the sum. As only children which can make use of the
571resource at the moment participate in the distribution, this is
572work-conserving. Due to the dynamic nature, this model is usually
573used for stateless resources.
574
575All weights are in the range [1, 10000] with the default at 100. This
576allows symmetric multiplicative biases in both directions at fine
577enough granularity while staying in the intuitive range.
578
579As long as the weight is in range, all configuration combinations are
580valid and there is no reason to reject configuration changes or
581process migrations.
582
583"cpu.weight" proportionally distributes CPU cycles to active children
584and is an example of this type.
585
586
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300587Limits
588------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500589
590A child can only consume upto the configured amount of the resource.
591Limits can be over-committed - the sum of the limits of children can
592exceed the amount of resource available to the parent.
593
594Limits are in the range [0, max] and defaults to "max", which is noop.
595
596As limits can be over-committed, all configuration combinations are
597valid and there is no reason to reject configuration changes or
598process migrations.
599
600"io.max" limits the maximum BPS and/or IOPS that a cgroup can consume
601on an IO device and is an example of this type.
602
603
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300604Protections
605-----------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500606
607A cgroup is protected to be allocated upto the configured amount of
608the resource if the usages of all its ancestors are under their
609protected levels. Protections can be hard guarantees or best effort
610soft boundaries. Protections can also be over-committed in which case
611only upto the amount available to the parent is protected among
612children.
613
614Protections are in the range [0, max] and defaults to 0, which is
615noop.
616
617As protections can be over-committed, all configuration combinations
618are valid and there is no reason to reject configuration changes or
619process migrations.
620
621"memory.low" implements best-effort memory protection and is an
622example of this type.
623
624
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300625Allocations
626-----------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500627
628A cgroup is exclusively allocated a certain amount of a finite
629resource. Allocations can't be over-committed - the sum of the
630allocations of children can not exceed the amount of resource
631available to the parent.
632
633Allocations are in the range [0, max] and defaults to 0, which is no
634resource.
635
636As allocations can't be over-committed, some configuration
637combinations are invalid and should be rejected. Also, if the
638resource is mandatory for execution of processes, process migrations
639may be rejected.
640
641"cpu.rt.max" hard-allocates realtime slices and is an example of this
642type.
643
644
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300645Interface Files
646===============
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500647
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300648Format
649------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500650
651All interface files should be in one of the following formats whenever
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300652possible::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500653
654 New-line separated values
655 (when only one value can be written at once)
656
657 VAL0\n
658 VAL1\n
659 ...
660
661 Space separated values
662 (when read-only or multiple values can be written at once)
663
664 VAL0 VAL1 ...\n
665
666 Flat keyed
667
668 KEY0 VAL0\n
669 KEY1 VAL1\n
670 ...
671
672 Nested keyed
673
674 KEY0 SUB_KEY0=VAL00 SUB_KEY1=VAL01...
675 KEY1 SUB_KEY0=VAL10 SUB_KEY1=VAL11...
676 ...
677
678For a writable file, the format for writing should generally match
679reading; however, controllers may allow omitting later fields or
680implement restricted shortcuts for most common use cases.
681
682For both flat and nested keyed files, only the values for a single key
683can be written at a time. For nested keyed files, the sub key pairs
684may be specified in any order and not all pairs have to be specified.
685
686
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300687Conventions
688-----------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500689
690- Settings for a single feature should be contained in a single file.
691
692- The root cgroup should be exempt from resource control and thus
693 shouldn't have resource control interface files. Also,
694 informational files on the root cgroup which end up showing global
695 information available elsewhere shouldn't exist.
696
697- If a controller implements weight based resource distribution, its
698 interface file should be named "weight" and have the range [1,
699 10000] with 100 as the default. The values are chosen to allow
700 enough and symmetric bias in both directions while keeping it
701 intuitive (the default is 100%).
702
703- If a controller implements an absolute resource guarantee and/or
704 limit, the interface files should be named "min" and "max"
705 respectively. If a controller implements best effort resource
706 guarantee and/or limit, the interface files should be named "low"
707 and "high" respectively.
708
709 In the above four control files, the special token "max" should be
710 used to represent upward infinity for both reading and writing.
711
712- If a setting has a configurable default value and keyed specific
713 overrides, the default entry should be keyed with "default" and
714 appear as the first entry in the file.
715
716 The default value can be updated by writing either "default $VAL" or
717 "$VAL".
718
719 When writing to update a specific override, "default" can be used as
720 the value to indicate removal of the override. Override entries
721 with "default" as the value must not appear when read.
722
723 For example, a setting which is keyed by major:minor device numbers
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300724 with integer values may look like the following::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500725
726 # cat cgroup-example-interface-file
727 default 150
728 8:0 300
729
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300730 The default value can be updated by::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500731
732 # echo 125 > cgroup-example-interface-file
733
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300734 or::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500735
736 # echo "default 125" > cgroup-example-interface-file
737
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300738 An override can be set by::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500739
740 # echo "8:16 170" > cgroup-example-interface-file
741
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300742 and cleared by::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500743
744 # echo "8:0 default" > cgroup-example-interface-file
745 # cat cgroup-example-interface-file
746 default 125
747 8:16 170
748
749- For events which are not very high frequency, an interface file
750 "events" should be created which lists event key value pairs.
751 Whenever a notifiable event happens, file modified event should be
752 generated on the file.
753
754
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300755Core Interface Files
756--------------------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500757
758All cgroup core files are prefixed with "cgroup."
759
Tejun Heo8cfd8142017-07-21 11:14:51 -0400760 cgroup.type
761
762 A read-write single value file which exists on non-root
763 cgroups.
764
765 When read, it indicates the current type of the cgroup, which
766 can be one of the following values.
767
768 - "domain" : A normal valid domain cgroup.
769
770 - "domain threaded" : A threaded domain cgroup which is
771 serving as the root of a threaded subtree.
772
773 - "domain invalid" : A cgroup which is in an invalid state.
774 It can't be populated or have controllers enabled. It may
775 be allowed to become a threaded cgroup.
776
777 - "threaded" : A threaded cgroup which is a member of a
778 threaded subtree.
779
780 A cgroup can be turned into a threaded cgroup by writing
781 "threaded" to this file.
782
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500783 cgroup.procs
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500784 A read-write new-line separated values file which exists on
785 all cgroups.
786
787 When read, it lists the PIDs of all processes which belong to
788 the cgroup one-per-line. The PIDs are not ordered and the
789 same PID may show up more than once if the process got moved
790 to another cgroup and then back or the PID got recycled while
791 reading.
792
793 A PID can be written to migrate the process associated with
794 the PID to the cgroup. The writer should match all of the
795 following conditions.
796
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500797 - It must have write access to the "cgroup.procs" file.
798
799 - It must have write access to the "cgroup.procs" file of the
800 common ancestor of the source and destination cgroups.
801
802 When delegating a sub-hierarchy, write access to this file
803 should be granted along with the containing directory.
804
Tejun Heo8cfd8142017-07-21 11:14:51 -0400805 In a threaded cgroup, reading this file fails with EOPNOTSUPP
806 as all the processes belong to the thread root. Writing is
807 supported and moves every thread of the process to the cgroup.
808
809 cgroup.threads
810 A read-write new-line separated values file which exists on
811 all cgroups.
812
813 When read, it lists the TIDs of all threads which belong to
814 the cgroup one-per-line. The TIDs are not ordered and the
815 same TID may show up more than once if the thread got moved to
816 another cgroup and then back or the TID got recycled while
817 reading.
818
819 A TID can be written to migrate the thread associated with the
820 TID to the cgroup. The writer should match all of the
821 following conditions.
822
823 - It must have write access to the "cgroup.threads" file.
824
825 - The cgroup that the thread is currently in must be in the
826 same resource domain as the destination cgroup.
827
828 - It must have write access to the "cgroup.procs" file of the
829 common ancestor of the source and destination cgroups.
830
831 When delegating a sub-hierarchy, write access to this file
832 should be granted along with the containing directory.
833
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500834 cgroup.controllers
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500835 A read-only space separated values file which exists on all
836 cgroups.
837
838 It shows space separated list of all controllers available to
839 the cgroup. The controllers are not ordered.
840
841 cgroup.subtree_control
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500842 A read-write space separated values file which exists on all
843 cgroups. Starts out empty.
844
845 When read, it shows space separated list of the controllers
846 which are enabled to control resource distribution from the
847 cgroup to its children.
848
849 Space separated list of controllers prefixed with '+' or '-'
850 can be written to enable or disable controllers. A controller
851 name prefixed with '+' enables the controller and '-'
852 disables. If a controller appears more than once on the list,
853 the last one is effective. When multiple enable and disable
854 operations are specified, either all succeed or all fail.
855
856 cgroup.events
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500857 A read-only flat-keyed file which exists on non-root cgroups.
858 The following entries are defined. Unless specified
859 otherwise, a value change in this file generates a file
860 modified event.
861
862 populated
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500863 1 if the cgroup or its descendants contains any live
864 processes; otherwise, 0.
865
Roman Gushchin1a926e02017-07-28 18:28:44 +0100866 cgroup.max.descendants
867 A read-write single value files. The default is "max".
868
869 Maximum allowed number of descent cgroups.
870 If the actual number of descendants is equal or larger,
871 an attempt to create a new cgroup in the hierarchy will fail.
872
873 cgroup.max.depth
874 A read-write single value files. The default is "max".
875
876 Maximum allowed descent depth below the current cgroup.
877 If the actual descent depth is equal or larger,
878 an attempt to create a new child cgroup will fail.
879
Roman Gushchinec392252017-08-02 17:55:31 +0100880 cgroup.stat
881 A read-only flat-keyed file with the following entries:
882
883 nr_descendants
884 Total number of visible descendant cgroups.
885
886 nr_dying_descendants
887 Total number of dying descendant cgroups. A cgroup becomes
888 dying after being deleted by a user. The cgroup will remain
889 in dying state for some time undefined time (which can depend
890 on system load) before being completely destroyed.
891
892 A process can't enter a dying cgroup under any circumstances,
893 a dying cgroup can't revive.
894
895 A dying cgroup can consume system resources not exceeding
896 limits, which were active at the moment of cgroup deletion.
897
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500898
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300899Controllers
900===========
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500901
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300902CPU
903---
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500904
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500905The "cpu" controllers regulates distribution of CPU cycles. This
906controller implements weight and absolute bandwidth limit models for
907normal scheduling policy and absolute bandwidth allocation model for
908realtime scheduling policy.
909
Tejun Heoc2f31b72017-12-05 09:10:17 -0800910WARNING: cgroup2 doesn't yet support control of realtime processes and
911the cpu controller can only be enabled when all RT processes are in
912the root cgroup. Be aware that system management software may already
913have placed RT processes into nonroot cgroups during the system boot
914process, and these processes may need to be moved to the root cgroup
915before the cpu controller can be enabled.
916
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500917
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300918CPU Interface Files
919~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500920
921All time durations are in microseconds.
922
923 cpu.stat
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500924 A read-only flat-keyed file which exists on non-root cgroups.
Tejun Heod41bf8c2017-10-23 16:18:27 -0700925 This file exists whether the controller is enabled or not.
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500926
Tejun Heod41bf8c2017-10-23 16:18:27 -0700927 It always reports the following three stats:
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500928
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300929 - usage_usec
930 - user_usec
931 - system_usec
Tejun Heod41bf8c2017-10-23 16:18:27 -0700932
933 and the following three when the controller is enabled:
934
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300935 - nr_periods
936 - nr_throttled
937 - throttled_usec
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500938
939 cpu.weight
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500940 A read-write single value file which exists on non-root
941 cgroups. The default is "100".
942
943 The weight in the range [1, 10000].
944
Tejun Heo0d593632017-09-25 09:00:19 -0700945 cpu.weight.nice
946 A read-write single value file which exists on non-root
947 cgroups. The default is "0".
948
949 The nice value is in the range [-20, 19].
950
951 This interface file is an alternative interface for
952 "cpu.weight" and allows reading and setting weight using the
953 same values used by nice(2). Because the range is smaller and
954 granularity is coarser for the nice values, the read value is
955 the closest approximation of the current weight.
956
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500957 cpu.max
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500958 A read-write two value file which exists on non-root cgroups.
959 The default is "max 100000".
960
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300961 The maximum bandwidth limit. It's in the following format::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500962
963 $MAX $PERIOD
964
965 which indicates that the group may consume upto $MAX in each
966 $PERIOD duration. "max" for $MAX indicates no limit. If only
967 one number is written, $MAX is updated.
968
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500969
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300970Memory
971------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500972
973The "memory" controller regulates distribution of memory. Memory is
974stateful and implements both limit and protection models. Due to the
975intertwining between memory usage and reclaim pressure and the
976stateful nature of memory, the distribution model is relatively
977complex.
978
979While not completely water-tight, all major memory usages by a given
980cgroup are tracked so that the total memory consumption can be
981accounted and controlled to a reasonable extent. Currently, the
982following types of memory usages are tracked.
983
984- Userland memory - page cache and anonymous memory.
985
986- Kernel data structures such as dentries and inodes.
987
988- TCP socket buffers.
989
990The above list may expand in the future for better coverage.
991
992
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300993Memory Interface Files
994~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500995
996All memory amounts are in bytes. If a value which is not aligned to
997PAGE_SIZE is written, the value may be rounded up to the closest
998PAGE_SIZE multiple when read back.
999
1000 memory.current
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001001 A read-only single value file which exists on non-root
1002 cgroups.
1003
1004 The total amount of memory currently being used by the cgroup
1005 and its descendants.
1006
Roman Gushchinbf8d5d52018-06-07 17:07:46 -07001007 memory.min
1008 A read-write single value file which exists on non-root
1009 cgroups. The default is "0".
1010
1011 Hard memory protection. If the memory usage of a cgroup
1012 is within its effective min boundary, the cgroup's memory
1013 won't be reclaimed under any conditions. If there is no
1014 unprotected reclaimable memory available, OOM killer
1015 is invoked.
1016
1017 Effective min boundary is limited by memory.min values of
1018 all ancestor cgroups. If there is memory.min overcommitment
1019 (child cgroup or cgroups are requiring more protected memory
1020 than parent will allow), then each child cgroup will get
1021 the part of parent's protection proportional to its
1022 actual memory usage below memory.min.
1023
1024 Putting more memory than generally available under this
1025 protection is discouraged and may lead to constant OOMs.
1026
1027 If a memory cgroup is not populated with processes,
1028 its memory.min is ignored.
1029
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001030 memory.low
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001031 A read-write single value file which exists on non-root
1032 cgroups. The default is "0".
1033
Roman Gushchin78542072018-06-07 17:06:29 -07001034 Best-effort memory protection. If the memory usage of a
1035 cgroup is within its effective low boundary, the cgroup's
1036 memory won't be reclaimed unless memory can be reclaimed
1037 from unprotected cgroups.
1038
1039 Effective low boundary is limited by memory.low values of
1040 all ancestor cgroups. If there is memory.low overcommitment
Roman Gushchinbf8d5d52018-06-07 17:07:46 -07001041 (child cgroup or cgroups are requiring more protected memory
Roman Gushchin78542072018-06-07 17:06:29 -07001042 than parent will allow), then each child cgroup will get
Roman Gushchinbf8d5d52018-06-07 17:07:46 -07001043 the part of parent's protection proportional to its
Roman Gushchin78542072018-06-07 17:06:29 -07001044 actual memory usage below memory.low.
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001045
1046 Putting more memory than generally available under this
1047 protection is discouraged.
1048
1049 memory.high
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001050 A read-write single value file which exists on non-root
1051 cgroups. The default is "max".
1052
1053 Memory usage throttle limit. This is the main mechanism to
1054 control memory usage of a cgroup. If a cgroup's usage goes
1055 over the high boundary, the processes of the cgroup are
1056 throttled and put under heavy reclaim pressure.
1057
1058 Going over the high limit never invokes the OOM killer and
1059 under extreme conditions the limit may be breached.
1060
1061 memory.max
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001062 A read-write single value file which exists on non-root
1063 cgroups. The default is "max".
1064
1065 Memory usage hard limit. This is the final protection
1066 mechanism. If a cgroup's memory usage reaches this limit and
1067 can't be reduced, the OOM killer is invoked in the cgroup.
1068 Under certain circumstances, the usage may go over the limit
1069 temporarily.
1070
1071 This is the ultimate protection mechanism. As long as the
1072 high limit is used and monitored properly, this limit's
1073 utility is limited to providing the final safety net.
1074
Roman Gushchin3d8b38e2018-08-21 21:53:54 -07001075 memory.oom.group
1076 A read-write single value file which exists on non-root
1077 cgroups. The default value is "0".
1078
1079 Determines whether the cgroup should be treated as
1080 an indivisible workload by the OOM killer. If set,
1081 all tasks belonging to the cgroup or to its descendants
1082 (if the memory cgroup is not a leaf cgroup) are killed
1083 together or not at all. This can be used to avoid
1084 partial kills to guarantee workload integrity.
1085
1086 Tasks with the OOM protection (oom_score_adj set to -1000)
1087 are treated as an exception and are never killed.
1088
1089 If the OOM killer is invoked in a cgroup, it's not going
1090 to kill any tasks outside of this cgroup, regardless
1091 memory.oom.group values of ancestor cgroups.
1092
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001093 memory.events
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001094 A read-only flat-keyed file which exists on non-root cgroups.
1095 The following entries are defined. Unless specified
1096 otherwise, a value change in this file generates a file
1097 modified event.
1098
1099 low
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001100 The number of times the cgroup is reclaimed due to
1101 high memory pressure even though its usage is under
1102 the low boundary. This usually indicates that the low
1103 boundary is over-committed.
1104
1105 high
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001106 The number of times processes of the cgroup are
1107 throttled and routed to perform direct memory reclaim
1108 because the high memory boundary was exceeded. For a
1109 cgroup whose memory usage is capped by the high limit
1110 rather than global memory pressure, this event's
1111 occurrences are expected.
1112
1113 max
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001114 The number of times the cgroup's memory usage was
1115 about to go over the max boundary. If direct reclaim
Konstantin Khlebnikov8e675f72017-07-06 15:40:28 -07001116 fails to bring it down, the cgroup goes to OOM state.
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001117
1118 oom
Konstantin Khlebnikov8e675f72017-07-06 15:40:28 -07001119 The number of time the cgroup's memory usage was
1120 reached the limit and allocation was about to fail.
1121
1122 Depending on context result could be invocation of OOM
Vladimir Rutsky2877cbe2018-01-02 17:27:41 +01001123 killer and retrying allocation or failing allocation.
Konstantin Khlebnikov8e675f72017-07-06 15:40:28 -07001124
1125 Failed allocation in its turn could be returned into
Vladimir Rutsky2877cbe2018-01-02 17:27:41 +01001126 userspace as -ENOMEM or silently ignored in cases like
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001127 disk readahead. For now OOM in memory cgroup kills
Konstantin Khlebnikov8e675f72017-07-06 15:40:28 -07001128 tasks iff shortage has happened inside page fault.
1129
1130 oom_kill
Konstantin Khlebnikov8e675f72017-07-06 15:40:28 -07001131 The number of processes belonging to this cgroup
1132 killed by any kind of OOM killer.
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001133
Johannes Weiner587d9f72016-01-20 15:03:19 -08001134 memory.stat
Johannes Weiner587d9f72016-01-20 15:03:19 -08001135 A read-only flat-keyed file which exists on non-root cgroups.
1136
1137 This breaks down the cgroup's memory footprint into different
1138 types of memory, type-specific details, and other information
1139 on the state and past events of the memory management system.
1140
1141 All memory amounts are in bytes.
1142
1143 The entries are ordered to be human readable, and new entries
1144 can show up in the middle. Don't rely on items remaining in a
1145 fixed position; use the keys to look up specific values!
1146
1147 anon
Johannes Weiner587d9f72016-01-20 15:03:19 -08001148 Amount of memory used in anonymous mappings such as
1149 brk(), sbrk(), and mmap(MAP_ANONYMOUS)
1150
1151 file
Johannes Weiner587d9f72016-01-20 15:03:19 -08001152 Amount of memory used to cache filesystem data,
1153 including tmpfs and shared memory.
1154
Vladimir Davydov12580e42016-03-17 14:17:38 -07001155 kernel_stack
Vladimir Davydov12580e42016-03-17 14:17:38 -07001156 Amount of memory allocated to kernel stacks.
1157
Vladimir Davydov27ee57c2016-03-17 14:17:35 -07001158 slab
Vladimir Davydov27ee57c2016-03-17 14:17:35 -07001159 Amount of memory used for storing in-kernel data
1160 structures.
1161
Johannes Weiner4758e192016-02-02 16:57:41 -08001162 sock
Johannes Weiner4758e192016-02-02 16:57:41 -08001163 Amount of memory used in network transmission buffers
1164
Johannes Weiner9a4caf12017-05-03 14:52:45 -07001165 shmem
Johannes Weiner9a4caf12017-05-03 14:52:45 -07001166 Amount of cached filesystem data that is swap-backed,
1167 such as tmpfs, shm segments, shared anonymous mmap()s
1168
Johannes Weiner587d9f72016-01-20 15:03:19 -08001169 file_mapped
Johannes Weiner587d9f72016-01-20 15:03:19 -08001170 Amount of cached filesystem data mapped with mmap()
1171
1172 file_dirty
Johannes Weiner587d9f72016-01-20 15:03:19 -08001173 Amount of cached filesystem data that was modified but
1174 not yet written back to disk
1175
1176 file_writeback
Johannes Weiner587d9f72016-01-20 15:03:19 -08001177 Amount of cached filesystem data that was modified and
1178 is currently being written back to disk
1179
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001180 inactive_anon, active_anon, inactive_file, active_file, unevictable
Johannes Weiner587d9f72016-01-20 15:03:19 -08001181 Amount of memory, swap-backed and filesystem-backed,
1182 on the internal memory management lists used by the
1183 page reclaim algorithm
1184
Vladimir Davydov27ee57c2016-03-17 14:17:35 -07001185 slab_reclaimable
Vladimir Davydov27ee57c2016-03-17 14:17:35 -07001186 Part of "slab" that might be reclaimed, such as
1187 dentries and inodes.
1188
1189 slab_unreclaimable
Vladimir Davydov27ee57c2016-03-17 14:17:35 -07001190 Part of "slab" that cannot be reclaimed on memory
1191 pressure.
1192
Johannes Weiner587d9f72016-01-20 15:03:19 -08001193 pgfault
Johannes Weiner587d9f72016-01-20 15:03:19 -08001194 Total number of page faults incurred
1195
1196 pgmajfault
Johannes Weiner587d9f72016-01-20 15:03:19 -08001197 Number of major page faults incurred
1198
Roman Gushchinb3409592017-05-12 15:47:09 -07001199 workingset_refault
1200
1201 Number of refaults of previously evicted pages
1202
1203 workingset_activate
1204
1205 Number of refaulted pages that were immediately activated
1206
1207 workingset_nodereclaim
1208
1209 Number of times a shadow node has been reclaimed
1210
Roman Gushchin22621852017-07-06 15:40:25 -07001211 pgrefill
1212
1213 Amount of scanned pages (in an active LRU list)
1214
1215 pgscan
1216
1217 Amount of scanned pages (in an inactive LRU list)
1218
1219 pgsteal
1220
1221 Amount of reclaimed pages
1222
1223 pgactivate
1224
1225 Amount of pages moved to the active LRU list
1226
1227 pgdeactivate
1228
1229 Amount of pages moved to the inactive LRU lis
1230
1231 pglazyfree
1232
1233 Amount of pages postponed to be freed under memory pressure
1234
1235 pglazyfreed
1236
1237 Amount of reclaimed lazyfree pages
1238
Vladimir Davydov3e24b192016-01-20 15:03:13 -08001239 memory.swap.current
Vladimir Davydov3e24b192016-01-20 15:03:13 -08001240 A read-only single value file which exists on non-root
1241 cgroups.
1242
1243 The total amount of swap currently being used by the cgroup
1244 and its descendants.
1245
1246 memory.swap.max
Vladimir Davydov3e24b192016-01-20 15:03:13 -08001247 A read-write single value file which exists on non-root
1248 cgroups. The default is "max".
1249
1250 Swap usage hard limit. If a cgroup's swap usage reaches this
Vladimir Rutsky2877cbe2018-01-02 17:27:41 +01001251 limit, anonymous memory of the cgroup will not be swapped out.
Vladimir Davydov3e24b192016-01-20 15:03:13 -08001252
Tejun Heof3a53a32018-06-07 17:05:35 -07001253 memory.swap.events
1254 A read-only flat-keyed file which exists on non-root cgroups.
1255 The following entries are defined. Unless specified
1256 otherwise, a value change in this file generates a file
1257 modified event.
1258
1259 max
1260 The number of times the cgroup's swap usage was about
1261 to go over the max boundary and swap allocation
1262 failed.
1263
1264 fail
1265 The number of times swap allocation failed either
1266 because of running out of swap system-wide or max
1267 limit.
1268
Tejun Heobe091022018-06-07 17:09:21 -07001269 When reduced under the current usage, the existing swap
1270 entries are reclaimed gradually and the swap usage may stay
1271 higher than the limit for an extended period of time. This
1272 reduces the impact on the workload and memory management.
1273
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001274
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001275Usage Guidelines
1276~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001277
1278"memory.high" is the main mechanism to control memory usage.
1279Over-committing on high limit (sum of high limits > available memory)
1280and letting global memory pressure to distribute memory according to
1281usage is a viable strategy.
1282
1283Because breach of the high limit doesn't trigger the OOM killer but
1284throttles the offending cgroup, a management agent has ample
1285opportunities to monitor and take appropriate actions such as granting
1286more memory or terminating the workload.
1287
1288Determining whether a cgroup has enough memory is not trivial as
1289memory usage doesn't indicate whether the workload can benefit from
1290more memory. For example, a workload which writes data received from
1291network to a file can use all available memory but can also operate as
1292performant with a small amount of memory. A measure of memory
1293pressure - how much the workload is being impacted due to lack of
1294memory - is necessary to determine whether a workload needs more
1295memory; unfortunately, memory pressure monitoring mechanism isn't
1296implemented yet.
1297
1298
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001299Memory Ownership
1300~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001301
1302A memory area is charged to the cgroup which instantiated it and stays
1303charged to the cgroup until the area is released. Migrating a process
1304to a different cgroup doesn't move the memory usages that it
1305instantiated while in the previous cgroup to the new cgroup.
1306
1307A memory area may be used by processes belonging to different cgroups.
1308To which cgroup the area will be charged is in-deterministic; however,
1309over time, the memory area is likely to end up in a cgroup which has
1310enough memory allowance to avoid high reclaim pressure.
1311
1312If a cgroup sweeps a considerable amount of memory which is expected
1313to be accessed repeatedly by other cgroups, it may make sense to use
1314POSIX_FADV_DONTNEED to relinquish the ownership of memory areas
1315belonging to the affected files to ensure correct memory ownership.
1316
1317
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001318IO
1319--
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001320
1321The "io" controller regulates the distribution of IO resources. This
1322controller implements both weight based and absolute bandwidth or IOPS
1323limit distribution; however, weight based distribution is available
1324only if cfq-iosched is in use and neither scheme is available for
1325blk-mq devices.
1326
1327
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001328IO Interface Files
1329~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001330
1331 io.stat
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001332 A read-only nested-keyed file which exists on non-root
1333 cgroups.
1334
1335 Lines are keyed by $MAJ:$MIN device numbers and not ordered.
1336 The following nested keys are defined.
1337
Tejun Heo636620b2018-07-18 04:47:41 -07001338 ====== =====================
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001339 rbytes Bytes read
1340 wbytes Bytes written
1341 rios Number of read IOs
1342 wios Number of write IOs
Tejun Heo636620b2018-07-18 04:47:41 -07001343 dbytes Bytes discarded
1344 dios Number of discard IOs
1345 ====== =====================
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001346
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001347 An example read output follows:
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001348
Tejun Heo636620b2018-07-18 04:47:41 -07001349 8:16 rbytes=1459200 wbytes=314773504 rios=192 wios=353 dbytes=0 dios=0
1350 8:0 rbytes=90430464 wbytes=299008000 rios=8950 wios=1252 dbytes=50331648 dios=3021
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001351
1352 io.weight
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001353 A read-write flat-keyed file which exists on non-root cgroups.
1354 The default is "default 100".
1355
1356 The first line is the default weight applied to devices
1357 without specific override. The rest are overrides keyed by
1358 $MAJ:$MIN device numbers and not ordered. The weights are in
1359 the range [1, 10000] and specifies the relative amount IO time
1360 the cgroup can use in relation to its siblings.
1361
1362 The default weight can be updated by writing either "default
1363 $WEIGHT" or simply "$WEIGHT". Overrides can be set by writing
1364 "$MAJ:$MIN $WEIGHT" and unset by writing "$MAJ:$MIN default".
1365
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001366 An example read output follows::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001367
1368 default 100
1369 8:16 200
1370 8:0 50
1371
1372 io.max
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001373 A read-write nested-keyed file which exists on non-root
1374 cgroups.
1375
1376 BPS and IOPS based IO limit. Lines are keyed by $MAJ:$MIN
1377 device numbers and not ordered. The following nested keys are
1378 defined.
1379
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001380 ===== ==================================
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001381 rbps Max read bytes per second
1382 wbps Max write bytes per second
1383 riops Max read IO operations per second
1384 wiops Max write IO operations per second
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001385 ===== ==================================
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001386
1387 When writing, any number of nested key-value pairs can be
1388 specified in any order. "max" can be specified as the value
1389 to remove a specific limit. If the same key is specified
1390 multiple times, the outcome is undefined.
1391
1392 BPS and IOPS are measured in each IO direction and IOs are
1393 delayed if limit is reached. Temporary bursts are allowed.
1394
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001395 Setting read limit at 2M BPS and write at 120 IOPS for 8:16::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001396
1397 echo "8:16 rbps=2097152 wiops=120" > io.max
1398
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001399 Reading returns the following::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001400
1401 8:16 rbps=2097152 wbps=max riops=max wiops=120
1402
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001403 Write IOPS limit can be removed by writing the following::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001404
1405 echo "8:16 wiops=max" > io.max
1406
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001407 Reading now returns the following::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001408
1409 8:16 rbps=2097152 wbps=max riops=max wiops=max
1410
1411
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001412Writeback
1413~~~~~~~~~
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001414
1415Page cache is dirtied through buffered writes and shared mmaps and
1416written asynchronously to the backing filesystem by the writeback
1417mechanism. Writeback sits between the memory and IO domains and
1418regulates the proportion of dirty memory by balancing dirtying and
1419write IOs.
1420
1421The io controller, in conjunction with the memory controller,
1422implements control of page cache writeback IOs. The memory controller
1423defines the memory domain that dirty memory ratio is calculated and
1424maintained for and the io controller defines the io domain which
1425writes out dirty pages for the memory domain. Both system-wide and
1426per-cgroup dirty memory states are examined and the more restrictive
1427of the two is enforced.
1428
1429cgroup writeback requires explicit support from the underlying
1430filesystem. Currently, cgroup writeback is implemented on ext2, ext4
1431and btrfs. On other filesystems, all writeback IOs are attributed to
1432the root cgroup.
1433
1434There are inherent differences in memory and writeback management
1435which affects how cgroup ownership is tracked. Memory is tracked per
1436page while writeback per inode. For the purpose of writeback, an
1437inode is assigned to a cgroup and all IO requests to write dirty pages
1438from the inode are attributed to that cgroup.
1439
1440As cgroup ownership for memory is tracked per page, there can be pages
1441which are associated with different cgroups than the one the inode is
1442associated with. These are called foreign pages. The writeback
1443constantly keeps track of foreign pages and, if a particular foreign
1444cgroup becomes the majority over a certain period of time, switches
1445the ownership of the inode to that cgroup.
1446
1447While this model is enough for most use cases where a given inode is
1448mostly dirtied by a single cgroup even when the main writing cgroup
1449changes over time, use cases where multiple cgroups write to a single
1450inode simultaneously are not supported well. In such circumstances, a
1451significant portion of IOs are likely to be attributed incorrectly.
1452As memory controller assigns page ownership on the first use and
1453doesn't update it until the page is released, even if writeback
1454strictly follows page ownership, multiple cgroups dirtying overlapping
1455areas wouldn't work as expected. It's recommended to avoid such usage
1456patterns.
1457
1458The sysctl knobs which affect writeback behavior are applied to cgroup
1459writeback as follows.
1460
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001461 vm.dirty_background_ratio, vm.dirty_ratio
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001462 These ratios apply the same to cgroup writeback with the
1463 amount of available memory capped by limits imposed by the
1464 memory controller and system-wide clean memory.
1465
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001466 vm.dirty_background_bytes, vm.dirty_bytes
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001467 For cgroup writeback, this is calculated into ratio against
1468 total available memory and applied the same way as
1469 vm.dirty[_background]_ratio.
1470
1471
Josef Bacikb351f0c2018-07-03 11:15:02 -04001472IO Latency
1473~~~~~~~~~~
1474
1475This is a cgroup v2 controller for IO workload protection. You provide a group
1476with a latency target, and if the average latency exceeds that target the
1477controller will throttle any peers that have a lower latency target than the
1478protected workload.
1479
1480The limits are only applied at the peer level in the hierarchy. This means that
1481in the diagram below, only groups A, B, and C will influence each other, and
1482groups D and F will influence each other. Group G will influence nobody.
1483
1484 [root]
1485 / | \
1486 A B C
1487 / \ |
1488 D F G
1489
1490
1491So the ideal way to configure this is to set io.latency in groups A, B, and C.
1492Generally you do not want to set a value lower than the latency your device
1493supports. Experiment to find the value that works best for your workload.
1494Start at higher than the expected latency for your device and watch the
Dennis Zhou (Facebook)c480bcf2018-08-01 23:15:41 -07001495avg_lat value in io.stat for your workload group to get an idea of the
1496latency you see during normal operation. Use the avg_lat value as a basis for
1497your real setting, setting at 10-15% higher than the value in io.stat.
Josef Bacikb351f0c2018-07-03 11:15:02 -04001498
1499How IO Latency Throttling Works
1500~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1501
1502io.latency is work conserving; so as long as everybody is meeting their latency
1503target the controller doesn't do anything. Once a group starts missing its
1504target it begins throttling any peer group that has a higher target than itself.
1505This throttling takes 2 forms:
1506
1507- Queue depth throttling. This is the number of outstanding IO's a group is
1508 allowed to have. We will clamp down relatively quickly, starting at no limit
1509 and going all the way down to 1 IO at a time.
1510
1511- Artificial delay induction. There are certain types of IO that cannot be
1512 throttled without possibly adversely affecting higher priority groups. This
1513 includes swapping and metadata IO. These types of IO are allowed to occur
1514 normally, however they are "charged" to the originating group. If the
1515 originating group is being throttled you will see the use_delay and delay
1516 fields in io.stat increase. The delay value is how many microseconds that are
1517 being added to any process that runs in this group. Because this number can
1518 grow quite large if there is a lot of swapping or metadata IO occurring we
1519 limit the individual delay events to 1 second at a time.
1520
1521Once the victimized group starts meeting its latency target again it will start
1522unthrottling any peer groups that were throttled previously. If the victimized
1523group simply stops doing IO the global counter will unthrottle appropriately.
1524
1525IO Latency Interface Files
1526~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1527
1528 io.latency
1529 This takes a similar format as the other controllers.
1530
1531 "MAJOR:MINOR target=<target time in microseconds"
1532
1533 io.stat
1534 If the controller is enabled you will see extra stats in io.stat in
1535 addition to the normal ones.
1536
1537 depth
1538 This is the current queue depth for the group.
1539
1540 avg_lat
Dennis Zhou (Facebook)c480bcf2018-08-01 23:15:41 -07001541 This is an exponential moving average with a decay rate of 1/exp
1542 bound by the sampling interval. The decay rate interval can be
1543 calculated by multiplying the win value in io.stat by the
1544 corresponding number of samples based on the win value.
1545
1546 win
1547 The sampling window size in milliseconds. This is the minimum
1548 duration of time between evaluation events. Windows only elapse
1549 with IO activity. Idle periods extend the most recent window.
Josef Bacikb351f0c2018-07-03 11:15:02 -04001550
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001551PID
1552---
Hans Ragas20c56e52017-01-10 17:42:34 +00001553
1554The process number controller is used to allow a cgroup to stop any
1555new tasks from being fork()'d or clone()'d after a specified limit is
1556reached.
1557
1558The number of tasks in a cgroup can be exhausted in ways which other
1559controllers cannot prevent, thus warranting its own controller. For
1560example, a fork bomb is likely to exhaust the number of tasks before
1561hitting memory restrictions.
1562
1563Note that PIDs used in this controller refer to TIDs, process IDs as
1564used by the kernel.
1565
1566
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001567PID Interface Files
1568~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Hans Ragas20c56e52017-01-10 17:42:34 +00001569
1570 pids.max
Tobias Klauser312eb712017-02-17 18:44:11 +01001571 A read-write single value file which exists on non-root
1572 cgroups. The default is "max".
Hans Ragas20c56e52017-01-10 17:42:34 +00001573
Tobias Klauser312eb712017-02-17 18:44:11 +01001574 Hard limit of number of processes.
Hans Ragas20c56e52017-01-10 17:42:34 +00001575
1576 pids.current
Tobias Klauser312eb712017-02-17 18:44:11 +01001577 A read-only single value file which exists on all cgroups.
Hans Ragas20c56e52017-01-10 17:42:34 +00001578
Tobias Klauser312eb712017-02-17 18:44:11 +01001579 The number of processes currently in the cgroup and its
1580 descendants.
Hans Ragas20c56e52017-01-10 17:42:34 +00001581
1582Organisational operations are not blocked by cgroup policies, so it is
1583possible to have pids.current > pids.max. This can be done by either
1584setting the limit to be smaller than pids.current, or attaching enough
1585processes to the cgroup such that pids.current is larger than
1586pids.max. However, it is not possible to violate a cgroup PID policy
1587through fork() or clone(). These will return -EAGAIN if the creation
1588of a new process would cause a cgroup policy to be violated.
1589
1590
Roman Gushchin4ad5a322017-12-13 19:49:03 +00001591Device controller
1592-----------------
1593
1594Device controller manages access to device files. It includes both
1595creation of new device files (using mknod), and access to the
1596existing device files.
1597
1598Cgroup v2 device controller has no interface files and is implemented
1599on top of cgroup BPF. To control access to device files, a user may
1600create bpf programs of the BPF_CGROUP_DEVICE type and attach them
1601to cgroups. On an attempt to access a device file, corresponding
1602BPF programs will be executed, and depending on the return value
1603the attempt will succeed or fail with -EPERM.
1604
1605A BPF_CGROUP_DEVICE program takes a pointer to the bpf_cgroup_dev_ctx
1606structure, which describes the device access attempt: access type
1607(mknod/read/write) and device (type, major and minor numbers).
1608If the program returns 0, the attempt fails with -EPERM, otherwise
1609it succeeds.
1610
1611An example of BPF_CGROUP_DEVICE program may be found in the kernel
1612source tree in the tools/testing/selftests/bpf/dev_cgroup.c file.
1613
1614
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001615RDMA
1616----
Tejun Heo968ebff2017-01-29 14:35:20 -05001617
Parav Pandit9c1e67f2017-01-10 00:02:15 +00001618The "rdma" controller regulates the distribution and accounting of
1619of RDMA resources.
1620
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001621RDMA Interface Files
1622~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Parav Pandit9c1e67f2017-01-10 00:02:15 +00001623
1624 rdma.max
1625 A readwrite nested-keyed file that exists for all the cgroups
1626 except root that describes current configured resource limit
1627 for a RDMA/IB device.
1628
1629 Lines are keyed by device name and are not ordered.
1630 Each line contains space separated resource name and its configured
1631 limit that can be distributed.
1632
1633 The following nested keys are defined.
1634
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001635 ========== =============================
Parav Pandit9c1e67f2017-01-10 00:02:15 +00001636 hca_handle Maximum number of HCA Handles
1637 hca_object Maximum number of HCA Objects
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001638 ========== =============================
Parav Pandit9c1e67f2017-01-10 00:02:15 +00001639
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001640 An example for mlx4 and ocrdma device follows::
Parav Pandit9c1e67f2017-01-10 00:02:15 +00001641
1642 mlx4_0 hca_handle=2 hca_object=2000
1643 ocrdma1 hca_handle=3 hca_object=max
1644
1645 rdma.current
1646 A read-only file that describes current resource usage.
1647 It exists for all the cgroup except root.
1648
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001649 An example for mlx4 and ocrdma device follows::
Parav Pandit9c1e67f2017-01-10 00:02:15 +00001650
1651 mlx4_0 hca_handle=1 hca_object=20
1652 ocrdma1 hca_handle=1 hca_object=23
1653
1654
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001655Misc
1656----
Tejun Heo63f1ca52017-02-02 13:50:35 -05001657
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001658perf_event
1659~~~~~~~~~~
Tejun Heo968ebff2017-01-29 14:35:20 -05001660
1661perf_event controller, if not mounted on a legacy hierarchy, is
1662automatically enabled on the v2 hierarchy so that perf events can
1663always be filtered by cgroup v2 path. The controller can still be
1664moved to a legacy hierarchy after v2 hierarchy is populated.
1665
1666
Maciej S. Szmigieroc4e08422018-01-10 23:33:19 +01001667Non-normative information
1668-------------------------
1669
1670This section contains information that isn't considered to be a part of
1671the stable kernel API and so is subject to change.
1672
1673
1674CPU controller root cgroup process behaviour
1675~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1676
1677When distributing CPU cycles in the root cgroup each thread in this
1678cgroup is treated as if it was hosted in a separate child cgroup of the
1679root cgroup. This child cgroup weight is dependent on its thread nice
1680level.
1681
1682For details of this mapping see sched_prio_to_weight array in
1683kernel/sched/core.c file (values from this array should be scaled
1684appropriately so the neutral - nice 0 - value is 100 instead of 1024).
1685
1686
1687IO controller root cgroup process behaviour
1688~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1689
1690Root cgroup processes are hosted in an implicit leaf child node.
1691When distributing IO resources this implicit child node is taken into
1692account as if it was a normal child cgroup of the root cgroup with a
1693weight value of 200.
1694
1695
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001696Namespace
1697=========
Serge Hallynd4021f62016-01-29 02:54:10 -06001698
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001699Basics
1700------
Serge Hallynd4021f62016-01-29 02:54:10 -06001701
1702cgroup namespace provides a mechanism to virtualize the view of the
1703"/proc/$PID/cgroup" file and cgroup mounts. The CLONE_NEWCGROUP clone
1704flag can be used with clone(2) and unshare(2) to create a new cgroup
1705namespace. The process running inside the cgroup namespace will have
1706its "/proc/$PID/cgroup" output restricted to cgroupns root. The
1707cgroupns root is the cgroup of the process at the time of creation of
1708the cgroup namespace.
1709
1710Without cgroup namespace, the "/proc/$PID/cgroup" file shows the
1711complete path of the cgroup of a process. In a container setup where
1712a set of cgroups and namespaces are intended to isolate processes the
1713"/proc/$PID/cgroup" file may leak potential system level information
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001714to the isolated processes. For Example::
Serge Hallynd4021f62016-01-29 02:54:10 -06001715
1716 # cat /proc/self/cgroup
1717 0::/batchjobs/container_id1
1718
1719The path '/batchjobs/container_id1' can be considered as system-data
1720and undesirable to expose to the isolated processes. cgroup namespace
1721can be used to restrict visibility of this path. For example, before
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001722creating a cgroup namespace, one would see::
Serge Hallynd4021f62016-01-29 02:54:10 -06001723
1724 # ls -l /proc/self/ns/cgroup
1725 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 2014-07-15 10:37 /proc/self/ns/cgroup -> cgroup:[4026531835]
1726 # cat /proc/self/cgroup
1727 0::/batchjobs/container_id1
1728
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001729After unsharing a new namespace, the view changes::
Serge Hallynd4021f62016-01-29 02:54:10 -06001730
1731 # ls -l /proc/self/ns/cgroup
1732 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 2014-07-15 10:35 /proc/self/ns/cgroup -> cgroup:[4026532183]
1733 # cat /proc/self/cgroup
1734 0::/
1735
1736When some thread from a multi-threaded process unshares its cgroup
1737namespace, the new cgroupns gets applied to the entire process (all
1738the threads). This is natural for the v2 hierarchy; however, for the
1739legacy hierarchies, this may be unexpected.
1740
1741A cgroup namespace is alive as long as there are processes inside or
1742mounts pinning it. When the last usage goes away, the cgroup
1743namespace is destroyed. The cgroupns root and the actual cgroups
1744remain.
1745
1746
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001747The Root and Views
1748------------------
Serge Hallynd4021f62016-01-29 02:54:10 -06001749
1750The 'cgroupns root' for a cgroup namespace is the cgroup in which the
1751process calling unshare(2) is running. For example, if a process in
1752/batchjobs/container_id1 cgroup calls unshare, cgroup
1753/batchjobs/container_id1 becomes the cgroupns root. For the
1754init_cgroup_ns, this is the real root ('/') cgroup.
1755
1756The cgroupns root cgroup does not change even if the namespace creator
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001757process later moves to a different cgroup::
Serge Hallynd4021f62016-01-29 02:54:10 -06001758
1759 # ~/unshare -c # unshare cgroupns in some cgroup
1760 # cat /proc/self/cgroup
1761 0::/
1762 # mkdir sub_cgrp_1
1763 # echo 0 > sub_cgrp_1/cgroup.procs
1764 # cat /proc/self/cgroup
1765 0::/sub_cgrp_1
1766
1767Each process gets its namespace-specific view of "/proc/$PID/cgroup"
1768
1769Processes running inside the cgroup namespace will be able to see
1770cgroup paths (in /proc/self/cgroup) only inside their root cgroup.
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001771From within an unshared cgroupns::
Serge Hallynd4021f62016-01-29 02:54:10 -06001772
1773 # sleep 100000 &
1774 [1] 7353
1775 # echo 7353 > sub_cgrp_1/cgroup.procs
1776 # cat /proc/7353/cgroup
1777 0::/sub_cgrp_1
1778
1779From the initial cgroup namespace, the real cgroup path will be
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001780visible::
Serge Hallynd4021f62016-01-29 02:54:10 -06001781
1782 $ cat /proc/7353/cgroup
1783 0::/batchjobs/container_id1/sub_cgrp_1
1784
1785From a sibling cgroup namespace (that is, a namespace rooted at a
1786different cgroup), the cgroup path relative to its own cgroup
1787namespace root will be shown. For instance, if PID 7353's cgroup
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001788namespace root is at '/batchjobs/container_id2', then it will see::
Serge Hallynd4021f62016-01-29 02:54:10 -06001789
1790 # cat /proc/7353/cgroup
1791 0::/../container_id2/sub_cgrp_1
1792
1793Note that the relative path always starts with '/' to indicate that
1794its relative to the cgroup namespace root of the caller.
1795
1796
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001797Migration and setns(2)
1798----------------------
Serge Hallynd4021f62016-01-29 02:54:10 -06001799
1800Processes inside a cgroup namespace can move into and out of the
1801namespace root if they have proper access to external cgroups. For
1802example, from inside a namespace with cgroupns root at
1803/batchjobs/container_id1, and assuming that the global hierarchy is
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001804still accessible inside cgroupns::
Serge Hallynd4021f62016-01-29 02:54:10 -06001805
1806 # cat /proc/7353/cgroup
1807 0::/sub_cgrp_1
1808 # echo 7353 > batchjobs/container_id2/cgroup.procs
1809 # cat /proc/7353/cgroup
1810 0::/../container_id2
1811
1812Note that this kind of setup is not encouraged. A task inside cgroup
1813namespace should only be exposed to its own cgroupns hierarchy.
1814
1815setns(2) to another cgroup namespace is allowed when:
1816
1817(a) the process has CAP_SYS_ADMIN against its current user namespace
1818(b) the process has CAP_SYS_ADMIN against the target cgroup
1819 namespace's userns
1820
1821No implicit cgroup changes happen with attaching to another cgroup
1822namespace. It is expected that the someone moves the attaching
1823process under the target cgroup namespace root.
1824
1825
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001826Interaction with Other Namespaces
1827---------------------------------
Serge Hallynd4021f62016-01-29 02:54:10 -06001828
1829Namespace specific cgroup hierarchy can be mounted by a process
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001830running inside a non-init cgroup namespace::
Serge Hallynd4021f62016-01-29 02:54:10 -06001831
1832 # mount -t cgroup2 none $MOUNT_POINT
1833
1834This will mount the unified cgroup hierarchy with cgroupns root as the
1835filesystem root. The process needs CAP_SYS_ADMIN against its user and
1836mount namespaces.
1837
1838The virtualization of /proc/self/cgroup file combined with restricting
1839the view of cgroup hierarchy by namespace-private cgroupfs mount
1840provides a properly isolated cgroup view inside the container.
1841
1842
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001843Information on Kernel Programming
1844=================================
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001845
1846This section contains kernel programming information in the areas
1847where interacting with cgroup is necessary. cgroup core and
1848controllers are not covered.
1849
1850
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001851Filesystem Support for Writeback
1852--------------------------------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001853
1854A filesystem can support cgroup writeback by updating
1855address_space_operations->writepage[s]() to annotate bio's using the
1856following two functions.
1857
1858 wbc_init_bio(@wbc, @bio)
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001859 Should be called for each bio carrying writeback data and
1860 associates the bio with the inode's owner cgroup. Can be
1861 called anytime between bio allocation and submission.
1862
1863 wbc_account_io(@wbc, @page, @bytes)
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001864 Should be called for each data segment being written out.
1865 While this function doesn't care exactly when it's called
1866 during the writeback session, it's the easiest and most
1867 natural to call it as data segments are added to a bio.
1868
1869With writeback bio's annotated, cgroup support can be enabled per
1870super_block by setting SB_I_CGROUPWB in ->s_iflags. This allows for
1871selective disabling of cgroup writeback support which is helpful when
1872certain filesystem features, e.g. journaled data mode, are
1873incompatible.
1874
1875wbc_init_bio() binds the specified bio to its cgroup. Depending on
1876the configuration, the bio may be executed at a lower priority and if
1877the writeback session is holding shared resources, e.g. a journal
1878entry, may lead to priority inversion. There is no one easy solution
1879for the problem. Filesystems can try to work around specific problem
1880cases by skipping wbc_init_bio() or using bio_associate_blkcg()
1881directly.
1882
1883
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001884Deprecated v1 Core Features
1885===========================
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001886
1887- Multiple hierarchies including named ones are not supported.
1888
Tejun Heo5136f632017-06-27 14:30:28 -04001889- All v1 mount options are not supported.
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001890
1891- The "tasks" file is removed and "cgroup.procs" is not sorted.
1892
1893- "cgroup.clone_children" is removed.
1894
1895- /proc/cgroups is meaningless for v2. Use "cgroup.controllers" file
1896 at the root instead.
1897
1898
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001899Issues with v1 and Rationales for v2
1900====================================
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001901
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001902Multiple Hierarchies
1903--------------------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001904
1905cgroup v1 allowed an arbitrary number of hierarchies and each
1906hierarchy could host any number of controllers. While this seemed to
1907provide a high level of flexibility, it wasn't useful in practice.
1908
1909For example, as there is only one instance of each controller, utility
1910type controllers such as freezer which can be useful in all
1911hierarchies could only be used in one. The issue is exacerbated by
1912the fact that controllers couldn't be moved to another hierarchy once
1913hierarchies were populated. Another issue was that all controllers
1914bound to a hierarchy were forced to have exactly the same view of the
1915hierarchy. It wasn't possible to vary the granularity depending on
1916the specific controller.
1917
1918In practice, these issues heavily limited which controllers could be
1919put on the same hierarchy and most configurations resorted to putting
1920each controller on its own hierarchy. Only closely related ones, such
1921as the cpu and cpuacct controllers, made sense to be put on the same
1922hierarchy. This often meant that userland ended up managing multiple
1923similar hierarchies repeating the same steps on each hierarchy
1924whenever a hierarchy management operation was necessary.
1925
1926Furthermore, support for multiple hierarchies came at a steep cost.
1927It greatly complicated cgroup core implementation but more importantly
1928the support for multiple hierarchies restricted how cgroup could be
1929used in general and what controllers was able to do.
1930
1931There was no limit on how many hierarchies there might be, which meant
1932that a thread's cgroup membership couldn't be described in finite
1933length. The key might contain any number of entries and was unlimited
1934in length, which made it highly awkward to manipulate and led to
1935addition of controllers which existed only to identify membership,
1936which in turn exacerbated the original problem of proliferating number
1937of hierarchies.
1938
1939Also, as a controller couldn't have any expectation regarding the
1940topologies of hierarchies other controllers might be on, each
1941controller had to assume that all other controllers were attached to
1942completely orthogonal hierarchies. This made it impossible, or at
1943least very cumbersome, for controllers to cooperate with each other.
1944
1945In most use cases, putting controllers on hierarchies which are
1946completely orthogonal to each other isn't necessary. What usually is
1947called for is the ability to have differing levels of granularity
1948depending on the specific controller. In other words, hierarchy may
1949be collapsed from leaf towards root when viewed from specific
1950controllers. For example, a given configuration might not care about
1951how memory is distributed beyond a certain level while still wanting
1952to control how CPU cycles are distributed.
1953
1954
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001955Thread Granularity
1956------------------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001957
1958cgroup v1 allowed threads of a process to belong to different cgroups.
1959This didn't make sense for some controllers and those controllers
1960ended up implementing different ways to ignore such situations but
1961much more importantly it blurred the line between API exposed to
1962individual applications and system management interface.
1963
1964Generally, in-process knowledge is available only to the process
1965itself; thus, unlike service-level organization of processes,
1966categorizing threads of a process requires active participation from
1967the application which owns the target process.
1968
1969cgroup v1 had an ambiguously defined delegation model which got abused
1970in combination with thread granularity. cgroups were delegated to
1971individual applications so that they can create and manage their own
1972sub-hierarchies and control resource distributions along them. This
1973effectively raised cgroup to the status of a syscall-like API exposed
1974to lay programs.
1975
1976First of all, cgroup has a fundamentally inadequate interface to be
1977exposed this way. For a process to access its own knobs, it has to
1978extract the path on the target hierarchy from /proc/self/cgroup,
1979construct the path by appending the name of the knob to the path, open
1980and then read and/or write to it. This is not only extremely clunky
1981and unusual but also inherently racy. There is no conventional way to
1982define transaction across the required steps and nothing can guarantee
1983that the process would actually be operating on its own sub-hierarchy.
1984
1985cgroup controllers implemented a number of knobs which would never be
1986accepted as public APIs because they were just adding control knobs to
1987system-management pseudo filesystem. cgroup ended up with interface
1988knobs which were not properly abstracted or refined and directly
1989revealed kernel internal details. These knobs got exposed to
1990individual applications through the ill-defined delegation mechanism
1991effectively abusing cgroup as a shortcut to implementing public APIs
1992without going through the required scrutiny.
1993
1994This was painful for both userland and kernel. Userland ended up with
1995misbehaving and poorly abstracted interfaces and kernel exposing and
1996locked into constructs inadvertently.
1997
1998
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001999Competition Between Inner Nodes and Threads
2000-------------------------------------------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05002001
2002cgroup v1 allowed threads to be in any cgroups which created an
2003interesting problem where threads belonging to a parent cgroup and its
2004children cgroups competed for resources. This was nasty as two
2005different types of entities competed and there was no obvious way to
2006settle it. Different controllers did different things.
2007
2008The cpu controller considered threads and cgroups as equivalents and
2009mapped nice levels to cgroup weights. This worked for some cases but
2010fell flat when children wanted to be allocated specific ratios of CPU
2011cycles and the number of internal threads fluctuated - the ratios
2012constantly changed as the number of competing entities fluctuated.
2013There also were other issues. The mapping from nice level to weight
2014wasn't obvious or universal, and there were various other knobs which
2015simply weren't available for threads.
2016
2017The io controller implicitly created a hidden leaf node for each
2018cgroup to host the threads. The hidden leaf had its own copies of all
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03002019the knobs with ``leaf_`` prefixed. While this allowed equivalent
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05002020control over internal threads, it was with serious drawbacks. It
2021always added an extra layer of nesting which wouldn't be necessary
2022otherwise, made the interface messy and significantly complicated the
2023implementation.
2024
2025The memory controller didn't have a way to control what happened
2026between internal tasks and child cgroups and the behavior was not
2027clearly defined. There were attempts to add ad-hoc behaviors and
2028knobs to tailor the behavior to specific workloads which would have
2029led to problems extremely difficult to resolve in the long term.
2030
2031Multiple controllers struggled with internal tasks and came up with
2032different ways to deal with it; unfortunately, all the approaches were
2033severely flawed and, furthermore, the widely different behaviors
2034made cgroup as a whole highly inconsistent.
2035
2036This clearly is a problem which needs to be addressed from cgroup core
2037in a uniform way.
2038
2039
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03002040Other Interface Issues
2041----------------------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05002042
2043cgroup v1 grew without oversight and developed a large number of
2044idiosyncrasies and inconsistencies. One issue on the cgroup core side
2045was how an empty cgroup was notified - a userland helper binary was
2046forked and executed for each event. The event delivery wasn't
2047recursive or delegatable. The limitations of the mechanism also led
2048to in-kernel event delivery filtering mechanism further complicating
2049the interface.
2050
2051Controller interfaces were problematic too. An extreme example is
2052controllers completely ignoring hierarchical organization and treating
2053all cgroups as if they were all located directly under the root
2054cgroup. Some controllers exposed a large amount of inconsistent
2055implementation details to userland.
2056
2057There also was no consistency across controllers. When a new cgroup
2058was created, some controllers defaulted to not imposing extra
2059restrictions while others disallowed any resource usage until
2060explicitly configured. Configuration knobs for the same type of
2061control used widely differing naming schemes and formats. Statistics
2062and information knobs were named arbitrarily and used different
2063formats and units even in the same controller.
2064
2065cgroup v2 establishes common conventions where appropriate and updates
2066controllers so that they expose minimal and consistent interfaces.
2067
2068
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03002069Controller Issues and Remedies
2070------------------------------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05002071
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03002072Memory
2073~~~~~~
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05002074
2075The original lower boundary, the soft limit, is defined as a limit
2076that is per default unset. As a result, the set of cgroups that
2077global reclaim prefers is opt-in, rather than opt-out. The costs for
2078optimizing these mostly negative lookups are so high that the
2079implementation, despite its enormous size, does not even provide the
2080basic desirable behavior. First off, the soft limit has no
2081hierarchical meaning. All configured groups are organized in a global
2082rbtree and treated like equal peers, regardless where they are located
2083in the hierarchy. This makes subtree delegation impossible. Second,
2084the soft limit reclaim pass is so aggressive that it not just
2085introduces high allocation latencies into the system, but also impacts
2086system performance due to overreclaim, to the point where the feature
2087becomes self-defeating.
2088
2089The memory.low boundary on the other hand is a top-down allocated
Roman Gushchin78542072018-06-07 17:06:29 -07002090reserve. A cgroup enjoys reclaim protection when it's within its low,
2091which makes delegation of subtrees possible.
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05002092
2093The original high boundary, the hard limit, is defined as a strict
2094limit that can not budge, even if the OOM killer has to be called.
2095But this generally goes against the goal of making the most out of the
2096available memory. The memory consumption of workloads varies during
2097runtime, and that requires users to overcommit. But doing that with a
2098strict upper limit requires either a fairly accurate prediction of the
2099working set size or adding slack to the limit. Since working set size
2100estimation is hard and error prone, and getting it wrong results in
2101OOM kills, most users tend to err on the side of a looser limit and
2102end up wasting precious resources.
2103
2104The memory.high boundary on the other hand can be set much more
2105conservatively. When hit, it throttles allocations by forcing them
2106into direct reclaim to work off the excess, but it never invokes the
2107OOM killer. As a result, a high boundary that is chosen too
2108aggressively will not terminate the processes, but instead it will
2109lead to gradual performance degradation. The user can monitor this
2110and make corrections until the minimal memory footprint that still
2111gives acceptable performance is found.
2112
2113In extreme cases, with many concurrent allocations and a complete
2114breakdown of reclaim progress within the group, the high boundary can
2115be exceeded. But even then it's mostly better to satisfy the
2116allocation from the slack available in other groups or the rest of the
2117system than killing the group. Otherwise, memory.max is there to
2118limit this type of spillover and ultimately contain buggy or even
2119malicious applications.
Vladimir Davydov3e24b192016-01-20 15:03:13 -08002120
Johannes Weinerb6e6edc2016-03-17 14:20:28 -07002121Setting the original memory.limit_in_bytes below the current usage was
2122subject to a race condition, where concurrent charges could cause the
2123limit setting to fail. memory.max on the other hand will first set the
2124limit to prevent new charges, and then reclaim and OOM kill until the
2125new limit is met - or the task writing to memory.max is killed.
2126
Vladimir Davydov3e24b192016-01-20 15:03:13 -08002127The combined memory+swap accounting and limiting is replaced by real
2128control over swap space.
2129
2130The main argument for a combined memory+swap facility in the original
2131cgroup design was that global or parental pressure would always be
2132able to swap all anonymous memory of a child group, regardless of the
2133child's own (possibly untrusted) configuration. However, untrusted
2134groups can sabotage swapping by other means - such as referencing its
2135anonymous memory in a tight loop - and an admin can not assume full
2136swappability when overcommitting untrusted jobs.
2137
2138For trusted jobs, on the other hand, a combined counter is not an
2139intuitive userspace interface, and it flies in the face of the idea
2140that cgroup controllers should account and limit specific physical
2141resources. Swap space is a resource like all others in the system,
2142and that's why unified hierarchy allows distributing it separately.