Merge branches 'doc.2015.07.15a' and 'torture.2015.07.15a' into HEAD
doc.2015.07.15a: Documentation updates.
torture.2015.07.15a: Torture-test updates.
diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/rcu_dereference.txt b/Documentation/RCU/rcu_dereference.txt
index 1e6c0da..c0bf244 100644
--- a/Documentation/RCU/rcu_dereference.txt
+++ b/Documentation/RCU/rcu_dereference.txt
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@
o Avoid cancellation when using the "+" and "-" infix arithmetic
operators. For example, for a given variable "x", avoid
"(x-x)". There are similar arithmetic pitfalls from other
- arithmetic operatiors, such as "(x*0)", "(x/(x+1))" or "(x%1)".
+ arithmetic operators, such as "(x*0)", "(x/(x+1))" or "(x%1)".
The compiler is within its rights to substitute zero for all of
these expressions, so that subsequent accesses no longer depend
on the rcu_dereference(), again possibly resulting in bugs due
diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/stallwarn.txt b/Documentation/RCU/stallwarn.txt
index b57c0c1..efb9454 100644
--- a/Documentation/RCU/stallwarn.txt
+++ b/Documentation/RCU/stallwarn.txt
@@ -26,12 +26,6 @@
Stall-warning messages may be enabled and disabled completely via
/sys/module/rcupdate/parameters/rcu_cpu_stall_suppress.
-CONFIG_RCU_CPU_STALL_INFO
-
- This kernel configuration parameter causes the stall warning to
- print out additional per-CPU diagnostic information, including
- information on scheduling-clock ticks and RCU's idle-CPU tracking.
-
RCU_STALL_DELAY_DELTA
Although the lockdep facility is extremely useful, it does add
@@ -101,15 +95,13 @@
sort of false positive without resorting to things like stop_machine(),
which is overkill for this sort of problem.
-If the CONFIG_RCU_CPU_STALL_INFO kernel configuration parameter is set,
-more information is printed with the stall-warning message, for example:
+Recent kernels will print a long form of the stall-warning message:
INFO: rcu_preempt detected stall on CPU
0: (63959 ticks this GP) idle=241/3fffffffffffffff/0 softirq=82/543
(t=65000 jiffies)
-In kernels with CONFIG_RCU_FAST_NO_HZ, even more information is
-printed:
+In kernels with CONFIG_RCU_FAST_NO_HZ, more information is printed:
INFO: rcu_preempt detected stall on CPU
0: (64628 ticks this GP) idle=dd5/3fffffffffffffff/0 softirq=82/543 last_accelerate: a345/d342 nonlazy_posted: 25 .D
@@ -171,6 +163,23 @@
of the stall and the first message.
+Stall Warnings for Expedited Grace Periods
+
+If an expedited grace period detects a stall, it will place a message
+like the following in dmesg:
+
+ INFO: rcu_sched detected expedited stalls on CPUs: { 1 2 6 } 26009 jiffies s: 1043
+
+This indicates that CPUs 1, 2, and 6 have failed to respond to a
+reschedule IPI, that the expedited grace period has been going on for
+26,009 jiffies, and that the expedited grace-period sequence counter is
+1043. The fact that this last value is odd indicates that an expedited
+grace period is in flight.
+
+It is entirely possible to see stall warnings from normal and from
+expedited grace periods at about the same time from the same run.
+
+
What Causes RCU CPU Stall Warnings?
So your kernel printed an RCU CPU stall warning. The next question is
diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/trace.txt b/Documentation/RCU/trace.txt
index 08651da..97f17e9 100644
--- a/Documentation/RCU/trace.txt
+++ b/Documentation/RCU/trace.txt
@@ -237,42 +237,26 @@
The output of "cat rcu/rcu_preempt/rcuexp" looks as follows:
-s=21872 d=21872 w=0 tf=0 wd1=0 wd2=0 n=0 sc=21872 dt=21872 dl=0 dx=21872
+s=21872 wd0=0 wd1=0 wd2=0 wd3=5 n=0 enq=0 sc=21872
These fields are as follows:
-o "s" is the starting sequence number.
+o "s" is the sequence number, with an odd number indicating that
+ an expedited grace period is in progress.
-o "d" is the ending sequence number. When the starting and ending
- numbers differ, there is an expedited grace period in progress.
-
-o "w" is the number of times that the sequence numbers have been
- in danger of wrapping.
-
-o "tf" is the number of times that contention has resulted in a
- failure to begin an expedited grace period.
-
-o "wd1" and "wd2" are the number of times that an attempt to
- start an expedited grace period found that someone else had
- completed an expedited grace period that satisfies the
+o "wd0", "wd1", "wd2", and "wd3" are the number of times that an
+ attempt to start an expedited grace period found that someone
+ else had completed an expedited grace period that satisfies the
attempted request. "Our work is done."
-o "n" is number of times that contention was so great that
- the request was demoted from an expedited grace period to
- a normal grace period.
+o "n" is number of times that a concurrent CPU-hotplug operation
+ forced a fallback to a normal grace period.
+
+o "enq" is the number of quiescent states still outstanding.
o "sc" is the number of times that the attempt to start a
new expedited grace period succeeded.
-o "dt" is the number of times that we attempted to update
- the "d" counter.
-
-o "dl" is the number of times that we failed to update the "d"
- counter.
-
-o "dx" is the number of times that we succeeded in updating
- the "d" counter.
-
The output of "cat rcu/rcu_preempt/rcugp" looks as follows:
diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/whatisRCU.txt b/Documentation/RCU/whatisRCU.txt
index 5746b0c..adc2184 100644
--- a/Documentation/RCU/whatisRCU.txt
+++ b/Documentation/RCU/whatisRCU.txt
@@ -883,7 +883,7 @@
rcu_access_pointer
rcu_dereference_raw
- rcu_lockdep_assert
+ RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN
rcu_sleep_check
RCU_NONIDLE
diff --git a/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt b/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
index 1d6f045..01b5b68 100644
--- a/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
+++ b/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
@@ -3135,22 +3135,35 @@
in a given burst of a callback-flood test.
rcutorture.fqs_duration= [KNL]
- Set duration of force_quiescent_state bursts.
+ Set duration of force_quiescent_state bursts
+ in microseconds.
rcutorture.fqs_holdoff= [KNL]
- Set holdoff time within force_quiescent_state bursts.
+ Set holdoff time within force_quiescent_state bursts
+ in microseconds.
rcutorture.fqs_stutter= [KNL]
- Set wait time between force_quiescent_state bursts.
+ Set wait time between force_quiescent_state bursts
+ in seconds.
+
+ rcutorture.gp_cond= [KNL]
+ Use conditional/asynchronous update-side
+ primitives, if available.
rcutorture.gp_exp= [KNL]
- Use expedited update-side primitives.
+ Use expedited update-side primitives, if available.
rcutorture.gp_normal= [KNL]
- Use normal (non-expedited) update-side primitives.
- If both gp_exp and gp_normal are set, do both.
- If neither gp_exp nor gp_normal are set, still
- do both.
+ Use normal (non-expedited) asynchronous
+ update-side primitives, if available.
+
+ rcutorture.gp_sync= [KNL]
+ Use normal (non-expedited) synchronous
+ update-side primitives, if available. If all
+ of rcutorture.gp_cond=, rcutorture.gp_exp=,
+ rcutorture.gp_normal=, and rcutorture.gp_sync=
+ are zero, rcutorture acts as if is interpreted
+ they are all non-zero.
rcutorture.n_barrier_cbs= [KNL]
Set callbacks/threads for rcu_barrier() testing.
@@ -3177,9 +3190,6 @@
Set time (s) between CPU-hotplug operations, or
zero to disable CPU-hotplug testing.
- rcutorture.torture_runnable= [BOOT]
- Start rcutorture running at boot time.
-
rcutorture.shuffle_interval= [KNL]
Set task-shuffle interval (s). Shuffling tasks
allows some CPUs to go into dyntick-idle mode
@@ -3220,6 +3230,9 @@
Test RCU's dyntick-idle handling. See also the
rcutorture.shuffle_interval parameter.
+ rcutorture.torture_runnable= [BOOT]
+ Start rcutorture running at boot time.
+
rcutorture.torture_type= [KNL]
Specify the RCU implementation to test.
diff --git a/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt b/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt
index 13feb69..3185238 100644
--- a/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt
+++ b/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt
@@ -194,22 +194,22 @@
(*) On any given CPU, dependent memory accesses will be issued in order, with
respect to itself. This means that for:
- ACCESS_ONCE(Q) = P; smp_read_barrier_depends(); D = ACCESS_ONCE(*Q);
+ WRITE_ONCE(Q, P); smp_read_barrier_depends(); D = READ_ONCE(*Q);
the CPU will issue the following memory operations:
Q = LOAD P, D = LOAD *Q
and always in that order. On most systems, smp_read_barrier_depends()
- does nothing, but it is required for DEC Alpha. The ACCESS_ONCE()
- is required to prevent compiler mischief. Please note that you
- should normally use something like rcu_dereference() instead of
- open-coding smp_read_barrier_depends().
+ does nothing, but it is required for DEC Alpha. The READ_ONCE()
+ and WRITE_ONCE() are required to prevent compiler mischief. Please
+ note that you should normally use something like rcu_dereference()
+ instead of open-coding smp_read_barrier_depends().
(*) Overlapping loads and stores within a particular CPU will appear to be
ordered within that CPU. This means that for:
- a = ACCESS_ONCE(*X); ACCESS_ONCE(*X) = b;
+ a = READ_ONCE(*X); WRITE_ONCE(*X, b);
the CPU will only issue the following sequence of memory operations:
@@ -217,7 +217,7 @@
And for:
- ACCESS_ONCE(*X) = c; d = ACCESS_ONCE(*X);
+ WRITE_ONCE(*X, c); d = READ_ONCE(*X);
the CPU will only issue:
@@ -228,11 +228,11 @@
And there are a number of things that _must_ or _must_not_ be assumed:
- (*) It _must_not_ be assumed that the compiler will do what you want with
- memory references that are not protected by ACCESS_ONCE(). Without
- ACCESS_ONCE(), the compiler is within its rights to do all sorts
- of "creative" transformations, which are covered in the Compiler
- Barrier section.
+ (*) It _must_not_ be assumed that the compiler will do what you want
+ with memory references that are not protected by READ_ONCE() and
+ WRITE_ONCE(). Without them, the compiler is within its rights to
+ do all sorts of "creative" transformations, which are covered in
+ the Compiler Barrier section.
(*) It _must_not_ be assumed that independent loads and stores will be issued
in the order given. This means that for:
@@ -520,8 +520,8 @@
{ A == 1, B == 2, C = 3, P == &A, Q == &C }
B = 4;
<write barrier>
- ACCESS_ONCE(P) = &B
- Q = ACCESS_ONCE(P);
+ WRITE_ONCE(P, &B)
+ Q = READ_ONCE(P);
D = *Q;
There's a clear data dependency here, and it would seem that by the end of the
@@ -547,8 +547,8 @@
{ A == 1, B == 2, C = 3, P == &A, Q == &C }
B = 4;
<write barrier>
- ACCESS_ONCE(P) = &B
- Q = ACCESS_ONCE(P);
+ WRITE_ONCE(P, &B);
+ Q = READ_ONCE(P);
<data dependency barrier>
D = *Q;
@@ -574,8 +574,8 @@
{ M[0] == 1, M[1] == 2, M[3] = 3, P == 0, Q == 3 }
M[1] = 4;
<write barrier>
- ACCESS_ONCE(P) = 1
- Q = ACCESS_ONCE(P);
+ WRITE_ONCE(P, 1);
+ Q = READ_ONCE(P);
<data dependency barrier>
D = M[Q];
@@ -596,10 +596,10 @@
simply a data dependency barrier to make it work correctly. Consider the
following bit of code:
- q = ACCESS_ONCE(a);
+ q = READ_ONCE(a);
if (q) {
<data dependency barrier> /* BUG: No data dependency!!! */
- p = ACCESS_ONCE(b);
+ p = READ_ONCE(b);
}
This will not have the desired effect because there is no actual data
@@ -608,10 +608,10 @@
the load from b as having happened before the load from a. In such a
case what's actually required is:
- q = ACCESS_ONCE(a);
+ q = READ_ONCE(a);
if (q) {
<read barrier>
- p = ACCESS_ONCE(b);
+ p = READ_ONCE(b);
}
However, stores are not speculated. This means that ordering -is- provided
@@ -619,7 +619,7 @@
q = READ_ONCE_CTRL(a);
if (q) {
- ACCESS_ONCE(b) = p;
+ WRITE_ONCE(b, p);
}
Control dependencies pair normally with other types of barriers. That
@@ -647,11 +647,11 @@
q = READ_ONCE_CTRL(a);
if (q) {
barrier();
- ACCESS_ONCE(b) = p;
+ WRITE_ONCE(b, p);
do_something();
} else {
barrier();
- ACCESS_ONCE(b) = p;
+ WRITE_ONCE(b, p);
do_something_else();
}
@@ -660,12 +660,12 @@
q = READ_ONCE_CTRL(a);
barrier();
- ACCESS_ONCE(b) = p; /* BUG: No ordering vs. load from a!!! */
+ WRITE_ONCE(b, p); /* BUG: No ordering vs. load from a!!! */
if (q) {
- /* ACCESS_ONCE(b) = p; -- moved up, BUG!!! */
+ /* WRITE_ONCE(b, p); -- moved up, BUG!!! */
do_something();
} else {
- /* ACCESS_ONCE(b) = p; -- moved up, BUG!!! */
+ /* WRITE_ONCE(b, p); -- moved up, BUG!!! */
do_something_else();
}
@@ -676,7 +676,7 @@
Therefore, if you need ordering in this example, you need explicit
memory barriers, for example, smp_store_release():
- q = ACCESS_ONCE(a);
+ q = READ_ONCE(a);
if (q) {
smp_store_release(&b, p);
do_something();
@@ -690,10 +690,10 @@
q = READ_ONCE_CTRL(a);
if (q) {
- ACCESS_ONCE(b) = p;
+ WRITE_ONCE(b, p);
do_something();
} else {
- ACCESS_ONCE(b) = r;
+ WRITE_ONCE(b, r);
do_something_else();
}
@@ -706,10 +706,10 @@
q = READ_ONCE_CTRL(a);
if (q % MAX) {
- ACCESS_ONCE(b) = p;
+ WRITE_ONCE(b, p);
do_something();
} else {
- ACCESS_ONCE(b) = r;
+ WRITE_ONCE(b, r);
do_something_else();
}
@@ -718,7 +718,7 @@
transform the above code into the following:
q = READ_ONCE_CTRL(a);
- ACCESS_ONCE(b) = p;
+ WRITE_ONCE(b, p);
do_something_else();
Given this transformation, the CPU is not required to respect the ordering
@@ -731,10 +731,10 @@
q = READ_ONCE_CTRL(a);
BUILD_BUG_ON(MAX <= 1); /* Order load from a with store to b. */
if (q % MAX) {
- ACCESS_ONCE(b) = p;
+ WRITE_ONCE(b, p);
do_something();
} else {
- ACCESS_ONCE(b) = r;
+ WRITE_ONCE(b, r);
do_something_else();
}
@@ -746,18 +746,18 @@
evaluation. Consider this example:
q = READ_ONCE_CTRL(a);
- if (a || 1 > 0)
- ACCESS_ONCE(b) = 1;
+ if (q || 1 > 0)
+ WRITE_ONCE(b, 1);
Because the first condition cannot fault and the second condition is
always true, the compiler can transform this example as following,
defeating control dependency:
q = READ_ONCE_CTRL(a);
- ACCESS_ONCE(b) = 1;
+ WRITE_ONCE(b, 1);
This example underscores the need to ensure that the compiler cannot
-out-guess your code. More generally, although ACCESS_ONCE() does force
+out-guess your code. More generally, although READ_ONCE() does force
the compiler to actually emit code for a given load, it does not force
the compiler to use the results.
@@ -769,7 +769,7 @@
======================= =======================
r1 = READ_ONCE_CTRL(x); r2 = READ_ONCE_CTRL(y);
if (r1 > 0) if (r2 > 0)
- ACCESS_ONCE(y) = 1; ACCESS_ONCE(x) = 1;
+ WRITE_ONCE(y, 1); WRITE_ONCE(x, 1);
assert(!(r1 == 1 && r2 == 1));
@@ -779,7 +779,7 @@
CPU 2
=====================
- ACCESS_ONCE(x) = 2;
+ WRITE_ONCE(x, 2);
assert(!(r1 == 2 && r2 == 1 && x == 2)); /* FAILS!!! */
@@ -798,8 +798,7 @@
(*) Control dependencies must be headed by READ_ONCE_CTRL().
Or, as a much less preferable alternative, interpose
- be headed by READ_ONCE() or an ACCESS_ONCE() read and must
- have smp_read_barrier_depends() between this read and the
+ smp_read_barrier_depends() between a READ_ONCE() and the
control-dependent write.
(*) Control dependencies can order prior loads against later stores.
@@ -815,15 +814,16 @@
(*) Control dependencies require at least one run-time conditional
between the prior load and the subsequent store, and this
- conditional must involve the prior load. If the compiler
- is able to optimize the conditional away, it will have also
- optimized away the ordering. Careful use of ACCESS_ONCE() can
- help to preserve the needed conditional.
+ conditional must involve the prior load. If the compiler is able
+ to optimize the conditional away, it will have also optimized
+ away the ordering. Careful use of READ_ONCE_CTRL() READ_ONCE(),
+ and WRITE_ONCE() can help to preserve the needed conditional.
(*) Control dependencies require that the compiler avoid reordering the
- dependency into nonexistence. Careful use of ACCESS_ONCE() or
- barrier() can help to preserve your control dependency. Please
- see the Compiler Barrier section for more information.
+ dependency into nonexistence. Careful use of READ_ONCE_CTRL()
+ or smp_read_barrier_depends() can help to preserve your control
+ dependency. Please see the Compiler Barrier section for more
+ information.
(*) Control dependencies pair normally with other types of barriers.
@@ -848,11 +848,11 @@
CPU 1 CPU 2
=============== ===============
- ACCESS_ONCE(a) = 1;
+ WRITE_ONCE(a, 1);
<write barrier>
- ACCESS_ONCE(b) = 2; x = ACCESS_ONCE(b);
+ WRITE_ONCE(b, 2); x = READ_ONCE(b);
<read barrier>
- y = ACCESS_ONCE(a);
+ y = READ_ONCE(a);
Or:
@@ -860,7 +860,7 @@
=============== ===============================
a = 1;
<write barrier>
- ACCESS_ONCE(b) = &a; x = ACCESS_ONCE(b);
+ WRITE_ONCE(b, &a); x = READ_ONCE(b);
<data dependency barrier>
y = *x;
@@ -868,11 +868,11 @@
CPU 1 CPU 2
=============== ===============================
- r1 = ACCESS_ONCE(y);
+ r1 = READ_ONCE(y);
<general barrier>
- ACCESS_ONCE(y) = 1; if (r2 = ACCESS_ONCE(x)) {
+ WRITE_ONCE(y, 1); if (r2 = READ_ONCE(x)) {
<implicit control dependency>
- ACCESS_ONCE(y) = 1;
+ WRITE_ONCE(y, 1);
}
assert(r1 == 0 || r2 == 0);
@@ -886,11 +886,11 @@
CPU 1 CPU 2
=================== ===================
- ACCESS_ONCE(a) = 1; }---- --->{ v = ACCESS_ONCE(c);
- ACCESS_ONCE(b) = 2; } \ / { w = ACCESS_ONCE(d);
+ WRITE_ONCE(a, 1); }---- --->{ v = READ_ONCE(c);
+ WRITE_ONCE(b, 2); } \ / { w = READ_ONCE(d);
<write barrier> \ <read barrier>
- ACCESS_ONCE(c) = 3; } / \ { x = ACCESS_ONCE(a);
- ACCESS_ONCE(d) = 4; }---- --->{ y = ACCESS_ONCE(b);
+ WRITE_ONCE(c, 3); } / \ { x = READ_ONCE(a);
+ WRITE_ONCE(d, 4); }---- --->{ y = READ_ONCE(b);
EXAMPLES OF MEMORY BARRIER SEQUENCES
@@ -1340,10 +1340,10 @@
barrier();
-This is a general barrier -- there are no read-read or write-write variants
-of barrier(). However, ACCESS_ONCE() can be thought of as a weak form
-for barrier() that affects only the specific accesses flagged by the
-ACCESS_ONCE().
+This is a general barrier -- there are no read-read or write-write
+variants of barrier(). However, READ_ONCE() and WRITE_ONCE() can be
+thought of as weak forms of barrier() that affect only the specific
+accesses flagged by the READ_ONCE() or WRITE_ONCE().
The barrier() function has the following effects:
@@ -1355,9 +1355,10 @@
(*) Within a loop, forces the compiler to load the variables used
in that loop's conditional on each pass through that loop.
-The ACCESS_ONCE() function can prevent any number of optimizations that,
-while perfectly safe in single-threaded code, can be fatal in concurrent
-code. Here are some examples of these sorts of optimizations:
+The READ_ONCE() and WRITE_ONCE() functions can prevent any number of
+optimizations that, while perfectly safe in single-threaded code, can
+be fatal in concurrent code. Here are some examples of these sorts
+of optimizations:
(*) The compiler is within its rights to reorder loads and stores
to the same variable, and in some cases, the CPU is within its
@@ -1370,11 +1371,11 @@
Might result in an older value of x stored in a[1] than in a[0].
Prevent both the compiler and the CPU from doing this as follows:
- a[0] = ACCESS_ONCE(x);
- a[1] = ACCESS_ONCE(x);
+ a[0] = READ_ONCE(x);
+ a[1] = READ_ONCE(x);
- In short, ACCESS_ONCE() provides cache coherence for accesses from
- multiple CPUs to a single variable.
+ In short, READ_ONCE() and WRITE_ONCE() provide cache coherence for
+ accesses from multiple CPUs to a single variable.
(*) The compiler is within its rights to merge successive loads from
the same variable. Such merging can cause the compiler to "optimize"
@@ -1391,9 +1392,9 @@
for (;;)
do_something_with(tmp);
- Use ACCESS_ONCE() to prevent the compiler from doing this to you:
+ Use READ_ONCE() to prevent the compiler from doing this to you:
- while (tmp = ACCESS_ONCE(a))
+ while (tmp = READ_ONCE(a))
do_something_with(tmp);
(*) The compiler is within its rights to reload a variable, for example,
@@ -1415,9 +1416,9 @@
a was modified by some other CPU between the "while" statement and
the call to do_something_with().
- Again, use ACCESS_ONCE() to prevent the compiler from doing this:
+ Again, use READ_ONCE() to prevent the compiler from doing this:
- while (tmp = ACCESS_ONCE(a))
+ while (tmp = READ_ONCE(a))
do_something_with(tmp);
Note that if the compiler runs short of registers, it might save
@@ -1437,21 +1438,21 @@
do { } while (0);
- This transformation is a win for single-threaded code because it gets
- rid of a load and a branch. The problem is that the compiler will
- carry out its proof assuming that the current CPU is the only one
- updating variable 'a'. If variable 'a' is shared, then the compiler's
- proof will be erroneous. Use ACCESS_ONCE() to tell the compiler
- that it doesn't know as much as it thinks it does:
+ This transformation is a win for single-threaded code because it
+ gets rid of a load and a branch. The problem is that the compiler
+ will carry out its proof assuming that the current CPU is the only
+ one updating variable 'a'. If variable 'a' is shared, then the
+ compiler's proof will be erroneous. Use READ_ONCE() to tell the
+ compiler that it doesn't know as much as it thinks it does:
- while (tmp = ACCESS_ONCE(a))
+ while (tmp = READ_ONCE(a))
do_something_with(tmp);
But please note that the compiler is also closely watching what you
- do with the value after the ACCESS_ONCE(). For example, suppose you
+ do with the value after the READ_ONCE(). For example, suppose you
do the following and MAX is a preprocessor macro with the value 1:
- while ((tmp = ACCESS_ONCE(a)) % MAX)
+ while ((tmp = READ_ONCE(a)) % MAX)
do_something_with(tmp);
Then the compiler knows that the result of the "%" operator applied
@@ -1475,12 +1476,12 @@
surprise if some other CPU might have stored to variable 'a' in the
meantime.
- Use ACCESS_ONCE() to prevent the compiler from making this sort of
+ Use WRITE_ONCE() to prevent the compiler from making this sort of
wrong guess:
- ACCESS_ONCE(a) = 0;
+ WRITE_ONCE(a, 0);
/* Code that does not store to variable a. */
- ACCESS_ONCE(a) = 0;
+ WRITE_ONCE(a, 0);
(*) The compiler is within its rights to reorder memory accesses unless
you tell it not to. For example, consider the following interaction
@@ -1509,40 +1510,43 @@
}
If the interrupt occurs between these two statement, then
- interrupt_handler() might be passed a garbled msg. Use ACCESS_ONCE()
+ interrupt_handler() might be passed a garbled msg. Use WRITE_ONCE()
to prevent this as follows:
void process_level(void)
{
- ACCESS_ONCE(msg) = get_message();
- ACCESS_ONCE(flag) = true;
+ WRITE_ONCE(msg, get_message());
+ WRITE_ONCE(flag, true);
}
void interrupt_handler(void)
{
- if (ACCESS_ONCE(flag))
- process_message(ACCESS_ONCE(msg));
+ if (READ_ONCE(flag))
+ process_message(READ_ONCE(msg));
}
- Note that the ACCESS_ONCE() wrappers in interrupt_handler()
- are needed if this interrupt handler can itself be interrupted
- by something that also accesses 'flag' and 'msg', for example,
- a nested interrupt or an NMI. Otherwise, ACCESS_ONCE() is not
- needed in interrupt_handler() other than for documentation purposes.
- (Note also that nested interrupts do not typically occur in modern
- Linux kernels, in fact, if an interrupt handler returns with
- interrupts enabled, you will get a WARN_ONCE() splat.)
+ Note that the READ_ONCE() and WRITE_ONCE() wrappers in
+ interrupt_handler() are needed if this interrupt handler can itself
+ be interrupted by something that also accesses 'flag' and 'msg',
+ for example, a nested interrupt or an NMI. Otherwise, READ_ONCE()
+ and WRITE_ONCE() are not needed in interrupt_handler() other than
+ for documentation purposes. (Note also that nested interrupts
+ do not typically occur in modern Linux kernels, in fact, if an
+ interrupt handler returns with interrupts enabled, you will get a
+ WARN_ONCE() splat.)
- You should assume that the compiler can move ACCESS_ONCE() past
- code not containing ACCESS_ONCE(), barrier(), or similar primitives.
+ You should assume that the compiler can move READ_ONCE() and
+ WRITE_ONCE() past code not containing READ_ONCE(), WRITE_ONCE(),
+ barrier(), or similar primitives.
- This effect could also be achieved using barrier(), but ACCESS_ONCE()
- is more selective: With ACCESS_ONCE(), the compiler need only forget
- the contents of the indicated memory locations, while with barrier()
- the compiler must discard the value of all memory locations that
- it has currented cached in any machine registers. Of course,
- the compiler must also respect the order in which the ACCESS_ONCE()s
- occur, though the CPU of course need not do so.
+ This effect could also be achieved using barrier(), but READ_ONCE()
+ and WRITE_ONCE() are more selective: With READ_ONCE() and
+ WRITE_ONCE(), the compiler need only forget the contents of the
+ indicated memory locations, while with barrier() the compiler must
+ discard the value of all memory locations that it has currented
+ cached in any machine registers. Of course, the compiler must also
+ respect the order in which the READ_ONCE()s and WRITE_ONCE()s occur,
+ though the CPU of course need not do so.
(*) The compiler is within its rights to invent stores to a variable,
as in the following example:
@@ -1562,16 +1566,16 @@
a branch. Unfortunately, in concurrent code, this optimization
could cause some other CPU to see a spurious value of 42 -- even
if variable 'a' was never zero -- when loading variable 'b'.
- Use ACCESS_ONCE() to prevent this as follows:
+ Use WRITE_ONCE() to prevent this as follows:
if (a)
- ACCESS_ONCE(b) = a;
+ WRITE_ONCE(b, a);
else
- ACCESS_ONCE(b) = 42;
+ WRITE_ONCE(b, 42);
The compiler can also invent loads. These are usually less
damaging, but they can result in cache-line bouncing and thus in
- poor performance and scalability. Use ACCESS_ONCE() to prevent
+ poor performance and scalability. Use READ_ONCE() to prevent
invented loads.
(*) For aligned memory locations whose size allows them to be accessed
@@ -1590,9 +1594,9 @@
This optimization can therefore be a win in single-threaded code.
In fact, a recent bug (since fixed) caused GCC to incorrectly use
this optimization in a volatile store. In the absence of such bugs,
- use of ACCESS_ONCE() prevents store tearing in the following example:
+ use of WRITE_ONCE() prevents store tearing in the following example:
- ACCESS_ONCE(p) = 0x00010002;
+ WRITE_ONCE(p, 0x00010002);
Use of packed structures can also result in load and store tearing,
as in this example:
@@ -1609,22 +1613,23 @@
foo2.b = foo1.b;
foo2.c = foo1.c;
- Because there are no ACCESS_ONCE() wrappers and no volatile markings,
- the compiler would be well within its rights to implement these three
- assignment statements as a pair of 32-bit loads followed by a pair
- of 32-bit stores. This would result in load tearing on 'foo1.b'
- and store tearing on 'foo2.b'. ACCESS_ONCE() again prevents tearing
- in this example:
+ Because there are no READ_ONCE() or WRITE_ONCE() wrappers and no
+ volatile markings, the compiler would be well within its rights to
+ implement these three assignment statements as a pair of 32-bit
+ loads followed by a pair of 32-bit stores. This would result in
+ load tearing on 'foo1.b' and store tearing on 'foo2.b'. READ_ONCE()
+ and WRITE_ONCE() again prevent tearing in this example:
foo2.a = foo1.a;
- ACCESS_ONCE(foo2.b) = ACCESS_ONCE(foo1.b);
+ WRITE_ONCE(foo2.b, READ_ONCE(foo1.b));
foo2.c = foo1.c;
-All that aside, it is never necessary to use ACCESS_ONCE() on a variable
-that has been marked volatile. For example, because 'jiffies' is marked
-volatile, it is never necessary to say ACCESS_ONCE(jiffies). The reason
-for this is that ACCESS_ONCE() is implemented as a volatile cast, which
-has no effect when its argument is already marked volatile.
+All that aside, it is never necessary to use READ_ONCE() and
+WRITE_ONCE() on a variable that has been marked volatile. For example,
+because 'jiffies' is marked volatile, it is never necessary to
+say READ_ONCE(jiffies). The reason for this is that READ_ONCE() and
+WRITE_ONCE() are implemented as volatile casts, which has no effect when
+its argument is already marked volatile.
Please note that these compiler barriers have no direct effect on the CPU,
which may then reorder things however it wishes.
@@ -1646,14 +1651,15 @@
All memory barriers except the data dependency barriers imply a compiler
barrier. Data dependencies do not impose any additional compiler ordering.
-Aside: In the case of data dependencies, the compiler would be expected to
-issue the loads in the correct order (eg. `a[b]` would have to load the value
-of b before loading a[b]), however there is no guarantee in the C specification
-that the compiler may not speculate the value of b (eg. is equal to 1) and load
-a before b (eg. tmp = a[1]; if (b != 1) tmp = a[b]; ). There is also the
-problem of a compiler reloading b after having loaded a[b], thus having a newer
-copy of b than a[b]. A consensus has not yet been reached about these problems,
-however the ACCESS_ONCE macro is a good place to start looking.
+Aside: In the case of data dependencies, the compiler would be expected
+to issue the loads in the correct order (eg. `a[b]` would have to load
+the value of b before loading a[b]), however there is no guarantee in
+the C specification that the compiler may not speculate the value of b
+(eg. is equal to 1) and load a before b (eg. tmp = a[1]; if (b != 1)
+tmp = a[b]; ). There is also the problem of a compiler reloading b after
+having loaded a[b], thus having a newer copy of b than a[b]. A consensus
+has not yet been reached about these problems, however the READ_ONCE()
+macro is a good place to start looking.
SMP memory barriers are reduced to compiler barriers on uniprocessor compiled
systems because it is assumed that a CPU will appear to be self-consistent,
@@ -1852,11 +1858,12 @@
imply a full memory barrier. If it is necessary for a RELEASE-ACQUIRE
pair to produce a full barrier, the ACQUIRE can be followed by an
smp_mb__after_unlock_lock() invocation. This will produce a full barrier
-if either (a) the RELEASE and the ACQUIRE are executed by the same
-CPU or task, or (b) the RELEASE and ACQUIRE act on the same variable.
-The smp_mb__after_unlock_lock() primitive is free on many architectures.
-Without smp_mb__after_unlock_lock(), the CPU's execution of the critical
-sections corresponding to the RELEASE and the ACQUIRE can cross, so that:
+(including transitivity) if either (a) the RELEASE and the ACQUIRE are
+executed by the same CPU or task, or (b) the RELEASE and ACQUIRE act on
+the same variable. The smp_mb__after_unlock_lock() primitive is free
+on many architectures. Without smp_mb__after_unlock_lock(), the CPU's
+execution of the critical sections corresponding to the RELEASE and the
+ACQUIRE can cross, so that:
*A = a;
RELEASE M
@@ -2126,12 +2133,12 @@
CPU 1 CPU 2
=============================== ===============================
- ACCESS_ONCE(*A) = a; ACCESS_ONCE(*E) = e;
+ WRITE_ONCE(*A, a); WRITE_ONCE(*E, e);
ACQUIRE M ACQUIRE Q
- ACCESS_ONCE(*B) = b; ACCESS_ONCE(*F) = f;
- ACCESS_ONCE(*C) = c; ACCESS_ONCE(*G) = g;
+ WRITE_ONCE(*B, b); WRITE_ONCE(*F, f);
+ WRITE_ONCE(*C, c); WRITE_ONCE(*G, g);
RELEASE M RELEASE Q
- ACCESS_ONCE(*D) = d; ACCESS_ONCE(*H) = h;
+ WRITE_ONCE(*D, d); WRITE_ONCE(*H, h);
Then there is no guarantee as to what order CPU 3 will see the accesses to *A
through *H occur in, other than the constraints imposed by the separate locks
@@ -2151,18 +2158,18 @@
CPU 1 CPU 2
=============================== ===============================
- ACCESS_ONCE(*A) = a;
+ WRITE_ONCE(*A, a);
ACQUIRE M [1]
- ACCESS_ONCE(*B) = b;
- ACCESS_ONCE(*C) = c;
+ WRITE_ONCE(*B, b);
+ WRITE_ONCE(*C, c);
RELEASE M [1]
- ACCESS_ONCE(*D) = d; ACCESS_ONCE(*E) = e;
+ WRITE_ONCE(*D, d); WRITE_ONCE(*E, e);
ACQUIRE M [2]
smp_mb__after_unlock_lock();
- ACCESS_ONCE(*F) = f;
- ACCESS_ONCE(*G) = g;
+ WRITE_ONCE(*F, f);
+ WRITE_ONCE(*G, g);
RELEASE M [2]
- ACCESS_ONCE(*H) = h;
+ WRITE_ONCE(*H, h);
CPU 3 might see:
@@ -2881,11 +2888,11 @@
operations in exactly the order specified, so that if the CPU is, for example,
given the following piece of code to execute:
- a = ACCESS_ONCE(*A);
- ACCESS_ONCE(*B) = b;
- c = ACCESS_ONCE(*C);
- d = ACCESS_ONCE(*D);
- ACCESS_ONCE(*E) = e;
+ a = READ_ONCE(*A);
+ WRITE_ONCE(*B, b);
+ c = READ_ONCE(*C);
+ d = READ_ONCE(*D);
+ WRITE_ONCE(*E, e);
they would then expect that the CPU will complete the memory operation for each
instruction before moving on to the next one, leading to a definite sequence of
@@ -2932,12 +2939,12 @@
_own_ accesses appear to be correctly ordered, without the need for a memory
barrier. For instance with the following code:
- U = ACCESS_ONCE(*A);
- ACCESS_ONCE(*A) = V;
- ACCESS_ONCE(*A) = W;
- X = ACCESS_ONCE(*A);
- ACCESS_ONCE(*A) = Y;
- Z = ACCESS_ONCE(*A);
+ U = READ_ONCE(*A);
+ WRITE_ONCE(*A, V);
+ WRITE_ONCE(*A, W);
+ X = READ_ONCE(*A);
+ WRITE_ONCE(*A, Y);
+ Z = READ_ONCE(*A);
and assuming no intervention by an external influence, it can be assumed that
the final result will appear to be:
@@ -2953,13 +2960,14 @@
U=LOAD *A, STORE *A=V, STORE *A=W, X=LOAD *A, STORE *A=Y, Z=LOAD *A
in that order, but, without intervention, the sequence may have almost any
-combination of elements combined or discarded, provided the program's view of
-the world remains consistent. Note that ACCESS_ONCE() is -not- optional
-in the above example, as there are architectures where a given CPU might
-reorder successive loads to the same location. On such architectures,
-ACCESS_ONCE() does whatever is necessary to prevent this, for example, on
-Itanium the volatile casts used by ACCESS_ONCE() cause GCC to emit the
-special ld.acq and st.rel instructions that prevent such reordering.
+combination of elements combined or discarded, provided the program's view
+of the world remains consistent. Note that READ_ONCE() and WRITE_ONCE()
+are -not- optional in the above example, as there are architectures
+where a given CPU might reorder successive loads to the same location.
+On such architectures, READ_ONCE() and WRITE_ONCE() do whatever is
+necessary to prevent this, for example, on Itanium the volatile casts
+used by READ_ONCE() and WRITE_ONCE() cause GCC to emit the special ld.acq
+and st.rel instructions (respectively) that prevent such reordering.
The compiler may also combine, discard or defer elements of the sequence before
the CPU even sees them.
@@ -2973,13 +2981,14 @@
*A = W;
-since, without either a write barrier or an ACCESS_ONCE(), it can be
+since, without either a write barrier or an WRITE_ONCE(), it can be
assumed that the effect of the storage of V to *A is lost. Similarly:
*A = Y;
Z = *A;
-may, without a memory barrier or an ACCESS_ONCE(), be reduced to:
+may, without a memory barrier or an READ_ONCE() and WRITE_ONCE(), be
+reduced to:
*A = Y;
Z = Y;
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index 8133cef..f92d813 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -8445,7 +8445,7 @@
M: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
R: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
R: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
-R: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
+R: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>
L: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
S: Supported
T: git git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/paulmck/linux-rcu.git
@@ -8472,7 +8472,7 @@
M: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
R: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
R: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
-R: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
+R: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>
L: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
W: http://www.rdrop.com/users/paulmck/RCU/
S: Supported
@@ -9340,7 +9340,7 @@
F: mm/sl?b*
SLEEPABLE READ-COPY UPDATE (SRCU)
-M: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
+M: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>
M: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
M: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
R: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c
index df919ff..3d6b526 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c
@@ -54,9 +54,9 @@
#define rcu_dereference_check_mce(p) \
({ \
- rcu_lockdep_assert(rcu_read_lock_sched_held() || \
- lockdep_is_held(&mce_chrdev_read_mutex), \
- "suspicious rcu_dereference_check_mce() usage"); \
+ RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(!rcu_read_lock_sched_held() && \
+ !lockdep_is_held(&mce_chrdev_read_mutex), \
+ "suspicious rcu_dereference_check_mce() usage"); \
smp_load_acquire(&(p)); \
})
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c b/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c
index f579192..c5a5231 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c
@@ -136,7 +136,7 @@
preempt_count_add(HARDIRQ_OFFSET);
/* This code is a bit fragile. Test it. */
- rcu_lockdep_assert(rcu_is_watching(), "ist_enter didn't work");
+ RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(!rcu_is_watching(), "ist_enter didn't work");
return prev_state;
}
diff --git a/drivers/base/power/opp.c b/drivers/base/power/opp.c
index 677fb28..3b188f2 100644
--- a/drivers/base/power/opp.c
+++ b/drivers/base/power/opp.c
@@ -110,8 +110,8 @@
#define opp_rcu_lockdep_assert() \
do { \
- rcu_lockdep_assert(rcu_read_lock_held() || \
- lockdep_is_held(&dev_opp_list_lock), \
+ RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(!rcu_read_lock_held() && \
+ !lockdep_is_held(&dev_opp_list_lock), \
"Missing rcu_read_lock() or " \
"dev_opp_list_lock protection"); \
} while (0)
diff --git a/include/linux/fdtable.h b/include/linux/fdtable.h
index fbb8874..674e3e2 100644
--- a/include/linux/fdtable.h
+++ b/include/linux/fdtable.h
@@ -86,8 +86,8 @@
static inline struct file *fcheck_files(struct files_struct *files, unsigned int fd)
{
- rcu_lockdep_assert(rcu_read_lock_held() ||
- lockdep_is_held(&files->file_lock),
+ RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(!rcu_read_lock_held() &&
+ !lockdep_is_held(&files->file_lock),
"suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage");
return __fcheck_files(files, fd);
}
diff --git a/include/linux/rcupdate.h b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
index 4cf5f51..ff47651 100644
--- a/include/linux/rcupdate.h
+++ b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
@@ -226,6 +226,37 @@
};
void wakeme_after_rcu(struct rcu_head *head);
+void __wait_rcu_gp(bool checktiny, int n, call_rcu_func_t *crcu_array,
+ struct rcu_synchronize *rs_array);
+
+#define _wait_rcu_gp(checktiny, ...) \
+do { \
+ call_rcu_func_t __crcu_array[] = { __VA_ARGS__ }; \
+ const int __n = ARRAY_SIZE(__crcu_array); \
+ struct rcu_synchronize __rs_array[__n]; \
+ \
+ __wait_rcu_gp(checktiny, __n, __crcu_array, __rs_array); \
+} while (0)
+
+#define wait_rcu_gp(...) _wait_rcu_gp(false, __VA_ARGS__)
+
+/**
+ * synchronize_rcu_mult - Wait concurrently for multiple grace periods
+ * @...: List of call_rcu() functions for the flavors to wait on.
+ *
+ * This macro waits concurrently for multiple flavors of RCU grace periods.
+ * For example, synchronize_rcu_mult(call_rcu, call_rcu_bh) would wait
+ * on concurrent RCU and RCU-bh grace periods. Waiting on a give SRCU
+ * domain requires you to write a wrapper function for that SRCU domain's
+ * call_srcu() function, supplying the corresponding srcu_struct.
+ *
+ * If Tiny RCU, tell _wait_rcu_gp() not to bother waiting for RCU
+ * or RCU-bh, given that anywhere synchronize_rcu_mult() can be called
+ * is automatically a grace period.
+ */
+#define synchronize_rcu_mult(...) \
+ _wait_rcu_gp(IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_TINY_RCU), __VA_ARGS__)
+
/**
* call_rcu_tasks() - Queue an RCU for invocation task-based grace period
* @head: structure to be used for queueing the RCU updates.
@@ -309,7 +340,7 @@
}
#endif /* #else #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_STALL_COMMON */
-#ifdef CONFIG_RCU_USER_QS
+#ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL
void rcu_user_enter(void);
void rcu_user_exit(void);
#else
@@ -317,7 +348,7 @@
static inline void rcu_user_exit(void) { }
static inline void rcu_user_hooks_switch(struct task_struct *prev,
struct task_struct *next) { }
-#endif /* CONFIG_RCU_USER_QS */
+#endif /* CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL */
#ifdef CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU
void rcu_init_nohz(void);
@@ -392,10 +423,6 @@
* TREE_RCU and rcu_barrier_() primitives in TINY_RCU.
*/
-typedef void call_rcu_func_t(struct rcu_head *head,
- void (*func)(struct rcu_head *head));
-void wait_rcu_gp(call_rcu_func_t crf);
-
#if defined(CONFIG_TREE_RCU) || defined(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU)
#include <linux/rcutree.h>
#elif defined(CONFIG_TINY_RCU)
@@ -469,46 +496,10 @@
* If CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC is selected, returns nonzero iff in an
* RCU-sched read-side critical section. In absence of
* CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC, this assumes we are in an RCU-sched read-side
- * critical section unless it can prove otherwise. Note that disabling
- * of preemption (including disabling irqs) counts as an RCU-sched
- * read-side critical section. This is useful for debug checks in functions
- * that required that they be called within an RCU-sched read-side
- * critical section.
- *
- * Check debug_lockdep_rcu_enabled() to prevent false positives during boot
- * and while lockdep is disabled.
- *
- * Note that if the CPU is in the idle loop from an RCU point of
- * view (ie: that we are in the section between rcu_idle_enter() and
- * rcu_idle_exit()) then rcu_read_lock_held() returns false even if the CPU
- * did an rcu_read_lock(). The reason for this is that RCU ignores CPUs
- * that are in such a section, considering these as in extended quiescent
- * state, so such a CPU is effectively never in an RCU read-side critical
- * section regardless of what RCU primitives it invokes. This state of
- * affairs is required --- we need to keep an RCU-free window in idle
- * where the CPU may possibly enter into low power mode. This way we can
- * notice an extended quiescent state to other CPUs that started a grace
- * period. Otherwise we would delay any grace period as long as we run in
- * the idle task.
- *
- * Similarly, we avoid claiming an SRCU read lock held if the current
- * CPU is offline.
+ * critical section unless it can prove otherwise.
*/
#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_COUNT
-static inline int rcu_read_lock_sched_held(void)
-{
- int lockdep_opinion = 0;
-
- if (!debug_lockdep_rcu_enabled())
- return 1;
- if (!rcu_is_watching())
- return 0;
- if (!rcu_lockdep_current_cpu_online())
- return 0;
- if (debug_locks)
- lockdep_opinion = lock_is_held(&rcu_sched_lock_map);
- return lockdep_opinion || preempt_count() != 0 || irqs_disabled();
-}
+int rcu_read_lock_sched_held(void);
#else /* #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_COUNT */
static inline int rcu_read_lock_sched_held(void)
{
@@ -545,6 +536,11 @@
#endif /* #else #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC */
+/* Deprecate rcu_lockdep_assert(): Use RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN() instead. */
+static inline void __attribute((deprecated)) deprecate_rcu_lockdep_assert(void)
+{
+}
+
#ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_RCU
/**
@@ -555,17 +551,32 @@
#define rcu_lockdep_assert(c, s) \
do { \
static bool __section(.data.unlikely) __warned; \
+ deprecate_rcu_lockdep_assert(); \
if (debug_lockdep_rcu_enabled() && !__warned && !(c)) { \
__warned = true; \
lockdep_rcu_suspicious(__FILE__, __LINE__, s); \
} \
} while (0)
+/**
+ * RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN - emit lockdep splat if specified condition is met
+ * @c: condition to check
+ * @s: informative message
+ */
+#define RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(c, s) \
+ do { \
+ static bool __section(.data.unlikely) __warned; \
+ if (debug_lockdep_rcu_enabled() && !__warned && (c)) { \
+ __warned = true; \
+ lockdep_rcu_suspicious(__FILE__, __LINE__, s); \
+ } \
+ } while (0)
+
#if defined(CONFIG_PROVE_RCU) && !defined(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU)
static inline void rcu_preempt_sleep_check(void)
{
- rcu_lockdep_assert(!lock_is_held(&rcu_lock_map),
- "Illegal context switch in RCU read-side critical section");
+ RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(lock_is_held(&rcu_lock_map),
+ "Illegal context switch in RCU read-side critical section");
}
#else /* #ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_RCU */
static inline void rcu_preempt_sleep_check(void)
@@ -576,15 +587,16 @@
#define rcu_sleep_check() \
do { \
rcu_preempt_sleep_check(); \
- rcu_lockdep_assert(!lock_is_held(&rcu_bh_lock_map), \
- "Illegal context switch in RCU-bh read-side critical section"); \
- rcu_lockdep_assert(!lock_is_held(&rcu_sched_lock_map), \
- "Illegal context switch in RCU-sched read-side critical section"); \
+ RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(lock_is_held(&rcu_bh_lock_map), \
+ "Illegal context switch in RCU-bh read-side critical section"); \
+ RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(lock_is_held(&rcu_sched_lock_map), \
+ "Illegal context switch in RCU-sched read-side critical section"); \
} while (0)
#else /* #ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_RCU */
-#define rcu_lockdep_assert(c, s) do { } while (0)
+#define rcu_lockdep_assert(c, s) deprecate_rcu_lockdep_assert()
+#define RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(c, s) do { } while (0)
#define rcu_sleep_check() do { } while (0)
#endif /* #else #ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_RCU */
@@ -615,13 +627,13 @@
({ \
/* Dependency order vs. p above. */ \
typeof(*p) *________p1 = (typeof(*p) *__force)lockless_dereference(p); \
- rcu_lockdep_assert(c, "suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage"); \
+ RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(!(c), "suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage"); \
rcu_dereference_sparse(p, space); \
((typeof(*p) __force __kernel *)(________p1)); \
})
#define __rcu_dereference_protected(p, c, space) \
({ \
- rcu_lockdep_assert(c, "suspicious rcu_dereference_protected() usage"); \
+ RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(!(c), "suspicious rcu_dereference_protected() usage"); \
rcu_dereference_sparse(p, space); \
((typeof(*p) __force __kernel *)(p)); \
})
@@ -845,8 +857,8 @@
__rcu_read_lock();
__acquire(RCU);
rcu_lock_acquire(&rcu_lock_map);
- rcu_lockdep_assert(rcu_is_watching(),
- "rcu_read_lock() used illegally while idle");
+ RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(!rcu_is_watching(),
+ "rcu_read_lock() used illegally while idle");
}
/*
@@ -896,8 +908,8 @@
*/
static inline void rcu_read_unlock(void)
{
- rcu_lockdep_assert(rcu_is_watching(),
- "rcu_read_unlock() used illegally while idle");
+ RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(!rcu_is_watching(),
+ "rcu_read_unlock() used illegally while idle");
__release(RCU);
__rcu_read_unlock();
rcu_lock_release(&rcu_lock_map); /* Keep acq info for rls diags. */
@@ -925,8 +937,8 @@
local_bh_disable();
__acquire(RCU_BH);
rcu_lock_acquire(&rcu_bh_lock_map);
- rcu_lockdep_assert(rcu_is_watching(),
- "rcu_read_lock_bh() used illegally while idle");
+ RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(!rcu_is_watching(),
+ "rcu_read_lock_bh() used illegally while idle");
}
/*
@@ -936,8 +948,8 @@
*/
static inline void rcu_read_unlock_bh(void)
{
- rcu_lockdep_assert(rcu_is_watching(),
- "rcu_read_unlock_bh() used illegally while idle");
+ RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(!rcu_is_watching(),
+ "rcu_read_unlock_bh() used illegally while idle");
rcu_lock_release(&rcu_bh_lock_map);
__release(RCU_BH);
local_bh_enable();
@@ -961,8 +973,8 @@
preempt_disable();
__acquire(RCU_SCHED);
rcu_lock_acquire(&rcu_sched_lock_map);
- rcu_lockdep_assert(rcu_is_watching(),
- "rcu_read_lock_sched() used illegally while idle");
+ RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(!rcu_is_watching(),
+ "rcu_read_lock_sched() used illegally while idle");
}
/* Used by lockdep and tracing: cannot be traced, cannot call lockdep. */
@@ -979,8 +991,8 @@
*/
static inline void rcu_read_unlock_sched(void)
{
- rcu_lockdep_assert(rcu_is_watching(),
- "rcu_read_unlock_sched() used illegally while idle");
+ RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(!rcu_is_watching(),
+ "rcu_read_unlock_sched() used illegally while idle");
rcu_lock_release(&rcu_sched_lock_map);
__release(RCU_SCHED);
preempt_enable();
@@ -1031,7 +1043,7 @@
#define RCU_INIT_POINTER(p, v) \
do { \
rcu_dereference_sparse(p, __rcu); \
- p = RCU_INITIALIZER(v); \
+ WRITE_ONCE(p, RCU_INITIALIZER(v)); \
} while (0)
/**
diff --git a/include/linux/rcutiny.h b/include/linux/rcutiny.h
index 3df6c1e..ff968b7 100644
--- a/include/linux/rcutiny.h
+++ b/include/linux/rcutiny.h
@@ -37,6 +37,16 @@
might_sleep();
}
+static inline unsigned long get_state_synchronize_sched(void)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static inline void cond_synchronize_sched(unsigned long oldstate)
+{
+ might_sleep();
+}
+
static inline void rcu_barrier_bh(void)
{
wait_rcu_gp(call_rcu_bh);
diff --git a/include/linux/rcutree.h b/include/linux/rcutree.h
index 4568791..5abec82 100644
--- a/include/linux/rcutree.h
+++ b/include/linux/rcutree.h
@@ -76,6 +76,8 @@
void rcu_barrier_sched(void);
unsigned long get_state_synchronize_rcu(void);
void cond_synchronize_rcu(unsigned long oldstate);
+unsigned long get_state_synchronize_sched(void);
+void cond_synchronize_sched(unsigned long oldstate);
extern unsigned long rcutorture_testseq;
extern unsigned long rcutorture_vernum;
diff --git a/include/linux/types.h b/include/linux/types.h
index 8715287..c314989 100644
--- a/include/linux/types.h
+++ b/include/linux/types.h
@@ -212,6 +212,9 @@
};
#define rcu_head callback_head
+typedef void (*rcu_callback_t)(struct rcu_head *head);
+typedef void (*call_rcu_func_t)(struct rcu_head *head, rcu_callback_t func);
+
/* clocksource cycle base type */
typedef u64 cycle_t;
diff --git a/include/trace/events/rcu.h b/include/trace/events/rcu.h
index c78e88c..ef72c4a 100644
--- a/include/trace/events/rcu.h
+++ b/include/trace/events/rcu.h
@@ -661,7 +661,6 @@
* Tracepoint for _rcu_barrier() execution. The string "s" describes
* the _rcu_barrier phase:
* "Begin": _rcu_barrier() started.
- * "Check": _rcu_barrier() checking for piggybacking.
* "EarlyExit": _rcu_barrier() piggybacked, thus early exit.
* "Inc1": _rcu_barrier() piggyback check counter incremented.
* "OfflineNoCB": _rcu_barrier() found callback on never-online CPU
diff --git a/init/Kconfig b/init/Kconfig
index af09b4f..ba1e6ea 100644
--- a/init/Kconfig
+++ b/init/Kconfig
@@ -538,15 +538,6 @@
config CONTEXT_TRACKING
bool
-config RCU_USER_QS
- bool
- help
- This option sets hooks on kernel / userspace boundaries and
- puts RCU in extended quiescent state when the CPU runs in
- userspace. It means that when a CPU runs in userspace, it is
- excluded from the global RCU state machine and thus doesn't
- try to keep the timer tick on for RCU.
-
config CONTEXT_TRACKING_FORCE
bool "Force context tracking"
depends on CONTEXT_TRACKING
@@ -707,6 +698,7 @@
config RCU_NOCB_CPU
bool "Offload RCU callback processing from boot-selected CPUs"
depends on TREE_RCU || PREEMPT_RCU
+ depends on RCU_EXPERT || NO_HZ_FULL
default n
help
Use this option to reduce OS jitter for aggressive HPC or
diff --git a/kernel/cgroup.c b/kernel/cgroup.c
index f89d929..b89f316 100644
--- a/kernel/cgroup.c
+++ b/kernel/cgroup.c
@@ -107,8 +107,8 @@
struct percpu_rw_semaphore cgroup_threadgroup_rwsem;
#define cgroup_assert_mutex_or_rcu_locked() \
- rcu_lockdep_assert(rcu_read_lock_held() || \
- lockdep_is_held(&cgroup_mutex), \
+ RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(!rcu_read_lock_held() && \
+ !lockdep_is_held(&cgroup_mutex), \
"cgroup_mutex or RCU read lock required");
/*
diff --git a/kernel/cpu.c b/kernel/cpu.c
index 9c9c9fa..d63b062 100644
--- a/kernel/cpu.c
+++ b/kernel/cpu.c
@@ -380,14 +380,14 @@
* will observe it.
*
* For CONFIG_PREEMPT we have preemptible RCU and its sync_rcu() might
- * not imply sync_sched(), so explicitly call both.
+ * not imply sync_sched(), so wait for both.
*
* Do sync before park smpboot threads to take care the rcu boost case.
*/
-#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT
- synchronize_sched();
-#endif
- synchronize_rcu();
+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT))
+ synchronize_rcu_mult(call_rcu, call_rcu_sched);
+ else
+ synchronize_rcu();
smpboot_park_threads(cpu);
diff --git a/kernel/pid.c b/kernel/pid.c
index 4fd07d5..ca36879 100644
--- a/kernel/pid.c
+++ b/kernel/pid.c
@@ -451,9 +451,8 @@
*/
struct task_struct *find_task_by_pid_ns(pid_t nr, struct pid_namespace *ns)
{
- rcu_lockdep_assert(rcu_read_lock_held(),
- "find_task_by_pid_ns() needs rcu_read_lock()"
- " protection");
+ RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(!rcu_read_lock_held(),
+ "find_task_by_pid_ns() needs rcu_read_lock() protection");
return pid_task(find_pid_ns(nr, ns), PIDTYPE_PID);
}
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c b/kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c
index 67b3f26..7719295 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c
@@ -635,6 +635,8 @@
.deferred_free = rcu_sched_torture_deferred_free,
.sync = synchronize_sched,
.exp_sync = synchronize_sched_expedited,
+ .get_state = get_state_synchronize_sched,
+ .cond_sync = cond_synchronize_sched,
.call = call_rcu_sched,
.cb_barrier = rcu_barrier_sched,
.fqs = rcu_sched_force_quiescent_state,
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/srcu.c b/kernel/rcu/srcu.c
index fb33d35..d3fcb2e 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/srcu.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/srcu.c
@@ -252,14 +252,15 @@
}
/**
- * srcu_readers_active - returns approximate number of readers.
+ * srcu_readers_active - returns true if there are readers. and false
+ * otherwise
* @sp: which srcu_struct to count active readers (holding srcu_read_lock).
*
* Note that this is not an atomic primitive, and can therefore suffer
* severe errors when invoked on an active srcu_struct. That said, it
* can be useful as an error check at cleanup time.
*/
-static int srcu_readers_active(struct srcu_struct *sp)
+static bool srcu_readers_active(struct srcu_struct *sp)
{
int cpu;
unsigned long sum = 0;
@@ -414,11 +415,11 @@
struct rcu_head *head = &rcu.head;
bool done = false;
- rcu_lockdep_assert(!lock_is_held(&sp->dep_map) &&
- !lock_is_held(&rcu_bh_lock_map) &&
- !lock_is_held(&rcu_lock_map) &&
- !lock_is_held(&rcu_sched_lock_map),
- "Illegal synchronize_srcu() in same-type SRCU (or RCU) read-side critical section");
+ RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(lock_is_held(&sp->dep_map) ||
+ lock_is_held(&rcu_bh_lock_map) ||
+ lock_is_held(&rcu_lock_map) ||
+ lock_is_held(&rcu_sched_lock_map),
+ "Illegal synchronize_srcu() in same-type SRCU (or in RCU) read-side critical section");
might_sleep();
init_completion(&rcu.completion);
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tiny.c b/kernel/rcu/tiny.c
index c291bd6..d047105 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tiny.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tiny.c
@@ -191,10 +191,10 @@
*/
void synchronize_sched(void)
{
- rcu_lockdep_assert(!lock_is_held(&rcu_bh_lock_map) &&
- !lock_is_held(&rcu_lock_map) &&
- !lock_is_held(&rcu_sched_lock_map),
- "Illegal synchronize_sched() in RCU read-side critical section");
+ RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(lock_is_held(&rcu_bh_lock_map) ||
+ lock_is_held(&rcu_lock_map) ||
+ lock_is_held(&rcu_sched_lock_map),
+ "Illegal synchronize_sched() in RCU read-side critical section");
cond_resched();
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(synchronize_sched);
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index 65137bc..9f75f25 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -70,6 +70,8 @@
static struct lock_class_key rcu_node_class[RCU_NUM_LVLS];
static struct lock_class_key rcu_fqs_class[RCU_NUM_LVLS];
+static struct lock_class_key rcu_exp_class[RCU_NUM_LVLS];
+static struct lock_class_key rcu_exp_sched_class[RCU_NUM_LVLS];
/*
* In order to export the rcu_state name to the tracing tools, it
@@ -124,13 +126,8 @@
static int rcu_fanout_leaf = RCU_FANOUT_LEAF;
module_param(rcu_fanout_leaf, int, 0444);
int rcu_num_lvls __read_mostly = RCU_NUM_LVLS;
-static int num_rcu_lvl[] = { /* Number of rcu_nodes at specified level. */
- NUM_RCU_LVL_0,
- NUM_RCU_LVL_1,
- NUM_RCU_LVL_2,
- NUM_RCU_LVL_3,
- NUM_RCU_LVL_4,
-};
+/* Number of rcu_nodes at specified level. */
+static int num_rcu_lvl[] = NUM_RCU_LVL_INIT;
int rcu_num_nodes __read_mostly = NUM_RCU_NODES; /* Total # rcu_nodes in use. */
/*
@@ -649,12 +646,12 @@
* It is illegal to enter an extended quiescent state while
* in an RCU read-side critical section.
*/
- rcu_lockdep_assert(!lock_is_held(&rcu_lock_map),
- "Illegal idle entry in RCU read-side critical section.");
- rcu_lockdep_assert(!lock_is_held(&rcu_bh_lock_map),
- "Illegal idle entry in RCU-bh read-side critical section.");
- rcu_lockdep_assert(!lock_is_held(&rcu_sched_lock_map),
- "Illegal idle entry in RCU-sched read-side critical section.");
+ RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(lock_is_held(&rcu_lock_map),
+ "Illegal idle entry in RCU read-side critical section.");
+ RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(lock_is_held(&rcu_bh_lock_map),
+ "Illegal idle entry in RCU-bh read-side critical section.");
+ RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(lock_is_held(&rcu_sched_lock_map),
+ "Illegal idle entry in RCU-sched read-side critical section.");
}
/*
@@ -701,7 +698,7 @@
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rcu_idle_enter);
-#ifdef CONFIG_RCU_USER_QS
+#ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL
/**
* rcu_user_enter - inform RCU that we are resuming userspace.
*
@@ -714,7 +711,7 @@
{
rcu_eqs_enter(1);
}
-#endif /* CONFIG_RCU_USER_QS */
+#endif /* CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL */
/**
* rcu_irq_exit - inform RCU that current CPU is exiting irq towards idle
@@ -828,7 +825,7 @@
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rcu_idle_exit);
-#ifdef CONFIG_RCU_USER_QS
+#ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL
/**
* rcu_user_exit - inform RCU that we are exiting userspace.
*
@@ -839,7 +836,7 @@
{
rcu_eqs_exit(1);
}
-#endif /* CONFIG_RCU_USER_QS */
+#endif /* CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL */
/**
* rcu_irq_enter - inform RCU that current CPU is entering irq away from idle
@@ -978,9 +975,9 @@
{
bool ret;
- preempt_disable();
+ preempt_disable_notrace();
ret = __rcu_is_watching();
- preempt_enable();
+ preempt_enable_notrace();
return ret;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rcu_is_watching);
@@ -1178,9 +1175,11 @@
j = jiffies;
gpa = READ_ONCE(rsp->gp_activity);
if (j - gpa > 2 * HZ)
- pr_err("%s kthread starved for %ld jiffies! g%lu c%lu f%#x\n",
+ pr_err("%s kthread starved for %ld jiffies! g%lu c%lu f%#x s%d ->state=%#lx\n",
rsp->name, j - gpa,
- rsp->gpnum, rsp->completed, rsp->gp_flags);
+ rsp->gpnum, rsp->completed,
+ rsp->gp_flags, rsp->gp_state,
+ rsp->gp_kthread ? rsp->gp_kthread->state : 0);
}
/*
@@ -1906,6 +1905,26 @@
}
/*
+ * Helper function for wait_event_interruptible_timeout() wakeup
+ * at force-quiescent-state time.
+ */
+static bool rcu_gp_fqs_check_wake(struct rcu_state *rsp, int *gfp)
+{
+ struct rcu_node *rnp = rcu_get_root(rsp);
+
+ /* Someone like call_rcu() requested a force-quiescent-state scan. */
+ *gfp = READ_ONCE(rsp->gp_flags);
+ if (*gfp & RCU_GP_FLAG_FQS)
+ return true;
+
+ /* The current grace period has completed. */
+ if (!READ_ONCE(rnp->qsmask) && !rcu_preempt_blocked_readers_cgp(rnp))
+ return true;
+
+ return false;
+}
+
+/*
* Do one round of quiescent-state forcing.
*/
static int rcu_gp_fqs(struct rcu_state *rsp, int fqs_state_in)
@@ -2041,6 +2060,7 @@
wait_event_interruptible(rsp->gp_wq,
READ_ONCE(rsp->gp_flags) &
RCU_GP_FLAG_INIT);
+ rsp->gp_state = RCU_GP_DONE_GPS;
/* Locking provides needed memory barrier. */
if (rcu_gp_init(rsp))
break;
@@ -2068,11 +2088,8 @@
TPS("fqswait"));
rsp->gp_state = RCU_GP_WAIT_FQS;
ret = wait_event_interruptible_timeout(rsp->gp_wq,
- ((gf = READ_ONCE(rsp->gp_flags)) &
- RCU_GP_FLAG_FQS) ||
- (!READ_ONCE(rnp->qsmask) &&
- !rcu_preempt_blocked_readers_cgp(rnp)),
- j);
+ rcu_gp_fqs_check_wake(rsp, &gf), j);
+ rsp->gp_state = RCU_GP_DOING_FQS;
/* Locking provides needed memory barriers. */
/* If grace period done, leave loop. */
if (!READ_ONCE(rnp->qsmask) &&
@@ -2110,7 +2127,9 @@
}
/* Handle grace-period end. */
+ rsp->gp_state = RCU_GP_CLEANUP;
rcu_gp_cleanup(rsp);
+ rsp->gp_state = RCU_GP_CLEANED;
}
}
@@ -3161,10 +3180,10 @@
*/
void synchronize_sched(void)
{
- rcu_lockdep_assert(!lock_is_held(&rcu_bh_lock_map) &&
- !lock_is_held(&rcu_lock_map) &&
- !lock_is_held(&rcu_sched_lock_map),
- "Illegal synchronize_sched() in RCU-sched read-side critical section");
+ RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(lock_is_held(&rcu_bh_lock_map) ||
+ lock_is_held(&rcu_lock_map) ||
+ lock_is_held(&rcu_sched_lock_map),
+ "Illegal synchronize_sched() in RCU-sched read-side critical section");
if (rcu_blocking_is_gp())
return;
if (rcu_gp_is_expedited())
@@ -3188,10 +3207,10 @@
*/
void synchronize_rcu_bh(void)
{
- rcu_lockdep_assert(!lock_is_held(&rcu_bh_lock_map) &&
- !lock_is_held(&rcu_lock_map) &&
- !lock_is_held(&rcu_sched_lock_map),
- "Illegal synchronize_rcu_bh() in RCU-bh read-side critical section");
+ RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(lock_is_held(&rcu_bh_lock_map) ||
+ lock_is_held(&rcu_lock_map) ||
+ lock_is_held(&rcu_sched_lock_map),
+ "Illegal synchronize_rcu_bh() in RCU-bh read-side critical section");
if (rcu_blocking_is_gp())
return;
if (rcu_gp_is_expedited())
@@ -3253,23 +3272,247 @@
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cond_synchronize_rcu);
-static int synchronize_sched_expedited_cpu_stop(void *data)
+/**
+ * get_state_synchronize_sched - Snapshot current RCU-sched state
+ *
+ * Returns a cookie that is used by a later call to cond_synchronize_sched()
+ * to determine whether or not a full grace period has elapsed in the
+ * meantime.
+ */
+unsigned long get_state_synchronize_sched(void)
{
/*
- * There must be a full memory barrier on each affected CPU
- * between the time that try_stop_cpus() is called and the
- * time that it returns.
- *
- * In the current initial implementation of cpu_stop, the
- * above condition is already met when the control reaches
- * this point and the following smp_mb() is not strictly
- * necessary. Do smp_mb() anyway for documentation and
- * robustness against future implementation changes.
+ * Any prior manipulation of RCU-protected data must happen
+ * before the load from ->gpnum.
*/
- smp_mb(); /* See above comment block. */
+ smp_mb(); /* ^^^ */
+
+ /*
+ * Make sure this load happens before the purportedly
+ * time-consuming work between get_state_synchronize_sched()
+ * and cond_synchronize_sched().
+ */
+ return smp_load_acquire(&rcu_sched_state.gpnum);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(get_state_synchronize_sched);
+
+/**
+ * cond_synchronize_sched - Conditionally wait for an RCU-sched grace period
+ *
+ * @oldstate: return value from earlier call to get_state_synchronize_sched()
+ *
+ * If a full RCU-sched grace period has elapsed since the earlier call to
+ * get_state_synchronize_sched(), just return. Otherwise, invoke
+ * synchronize_sched() to wait for a full grace period.
+ *
+ * Yes, this function does not take counter wrap into account. But
+ * counter wrap is harmless. If the counter wraps, we have waited for
+ * more than 2 billion grace periods (and way more on a 64-bit system!),
+ * so waiting for one additional grace period should be just fine.
+ */
+void cond_synchronize_sched(unsigned long oldstate)
+{
+ unsigned long newstate;
+
+ /*
+ * Ensure that this load happens before any RCU-destructive
+ * actions the caller might carry out after we return.
+ */
+ newstate = smp_load_acquire(&rcu_sched_state.completed);
+ if (ULONG_CMP_GE(oldstate, newstate))
+ synchronize_sched();
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cond_synchronize_sched);
+
+/* Adjust sequence number for start of update-side operation. */
+static void rcu_seq_start(unsigned long *sp)
+{
+ WRITE_ONCE(*sp, *sp + 1);
+ smp_mb(); /* Ensure update-side operation after counter increment. */
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(!(*sp & 0x1));
+}
+
+/* Adjust sequence number for end of update-side operation. */
+static void rcu_seq_end(unsigned long *sp)
+{
+ smp_mb(); /* Ensure update-side operation before counter increment. */
+ WRITE_ONCE(*sp, *sp + 1);
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(*sp & 0x1);
+}
+
+/* Take a snapshot of the update side's sequence number. */
+static unsigned long rcu_seq_snap(unsigned long *sp)
+{
+ unsigned long s;
+
+ smp_mb(); /* Caller's modifications seen first by other CPUs. */
+ s = (READ_ONCE(*sp) + 3) & ~0x1;
+ smp_mb(); /* Above access must not bleed into critical section. */
+ return s;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Given a snapshot from rcu_seq_snap(), determine whether or not a
+ * full update-side operation has occurred.
+ */
+static bool rcu_seq_done(unsigned long *sp, unsigned long s)
+{
+ return ULONG_CMP_GE(READ_ONCE(*sp), s);
+}
+
+/* Wrapper functions for expedited grace periods. */
+static void rcu_exp_gp_seq_start(struct rcu_state *rsp)
+{
+ rcu_seq_start(&rsp->expedited_sequence);
+}
+static void rcu_exp_gp_seq_end(struct rcu_state *rsp)
+{
+ rcu_seq_end(&rsp->expedited_sequence);
+ smp_mb(); /* Ensure that consecutive grace periods serialize. */
+}
+static unsigned long rcu_exp_gp_seq_snap(struct rcu_state *rsp)
+{
+ return rcu_seq_snap(&rsp->expedited_sequence);
+}
+static bool rcu_exp_gp_seq_done(struct rcu_state *rsp, unsigned long s)
+{
+ return rcu_seq_done(&rsp->expedited_sequence, s);
+}
+
+/* Common code for synchronize_{rcu,sched}_expedited() work-done checking. */
+static bool sync_exp_work_done(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_node *rnp,
+ struct rcu_data *rdp,
+ atomic_long_t *stat, unsigned long s)
+{
+ if (rcu_exp_gp_seq_done(rsp, s)) {
+ if (rnp)
+ mutex_unlock(&rnp->exp_funnel_mutex);
+ else if (rdp)
+ mutex_unlock(&rdp->exp_funnel_mutex);
+ /* Ensure test happens before caller kfree(). */
+ smp_mb__before_atomic(); /* ^^^ */
+ atomic_long_inc(stat);
+ return true;
+ }
+ return false;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Funnel-lock acquisition for expedited grace periods. Returns a
+ * pointer to the root rcu_node structure, or NULL if some other
+ * task did the expedited grace period for us.
+ */
+static struct rcu_node *exp_funnel_lock(struct rcu_state *rsp, unsigned long s)
+{
+ struct rcu_data *rdp;
+ struct rcu_node *rnp0;
+ struct rcu_node *rnp1 = NULL;
+
+ /*
+ * First try directly acquiring the root lock in order to reduce
+ * latency in the common case where expedited grace periods are
+ * rare. We check mutex_is_locked() to avoid pathological levels of
+ * memory contention on ->exp_funnel_mutex in the heavy-load case.
+ */
+ rnp0 = rcu_get_root(rsp);
+ if (!mutex_is_locked(&rnp0->exp_funnel_mutex)) {
+ if (mutex_trylock(&rnp0->exp_funnel_mutex)) {
+ if (sync_exp_work_done(rsp, rnp0, NULL,
+ &rsp->expedited_workdone0, s))
+ return NULL;
+ return rnp0;
+ }
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * Each pass through the following loop works its way
+ * up the rcu_node tree, returning if others have done the
+ * work or otherwise falls through holding the root rnp's
+ * ->exp_funnel_mutex. The mapping from CPU to rcu_node structure
+ * can be inexact, as it is just promoting locality and is not
+ * strictly needed for correctness.
+ */
+ rdp = per_cpu_ptr(rsp->rda, raw_smp_processor_id());
+ if (sync_exp_work_done(rsp, NULL, NULL, &rsp->expedited_workdone1, s))
+ return NULL;
+ mutex_lock(&rdp->exp_funnel_mutex);
+ rnp0 = rdp->mynode;
+ for (; rnp0 != NULL; rnp0 = rnp0->parent) {
+ if (sync_exp_work_done(rsp, rnp1, rdp,
+ &rsp->expedited_workdone2, s))
+ return NULL;
+ mutex_lock(&rnp0->exp_funnel_mutex);
+ if (rnp1)
+ mutex_unlock(&rnp1->exp_funnel_mutex);
+ else
+ mutex_unlock(&rdp->exp_funnel_mutex);
+ rnp1 = rnp0;
+ }
+ if (sync_exp_work_done(rsp, rnp1, rdp,
+ &rsp->expedited_workdone3, s))
+ return NULL;
+ return rnp1;
+}
+
+/* Invoked on each online non-idle CPU for expedited quiescent state. */
+static int synchronize_sched_expedited_cpu_stop(void *data)
+{
+ struct rcu_data *rdp = data;
+ struct rcu_state *rsp = rdp->rsp;
+
+ /* We are here: If we are last, do the wakeup. */
+ rdp->exp_done = true;
+ if (atomic_dec_and_test(&rsp->expedited_need_qs))
+ wake_up(&rsp->expedited_wq);
return 0;
}
+static void synchronize_sched_expedited_wait(struct rcu_state *rsp)
+{
+ int cpu;
+ unsigned long jiffies_stall;
+ unsigned long jiffies_start;
+ struct rcu_data *rdp;
+ int ret;
+
+ jiffies_stall = rcu_jiffies_till_stall_check();
+ jiffies_start = jiffies;
+
+ for (;;) {
+ ret = wait_event_interruptible_timeout(
+ rsp->expedited_wq,
+ !atomic_read(&rsp->expedited_need_qs),
+ jiffies_stall);
+ if (ret > 0)
+ return;
+ if (ret < 0) {
+ /* Hit a signal, disable CPU stall warnings. */
+ wait_event(rsp->expedited_wq,
+ !atomic_read(&rsp->expedited_need_qs));
+ return;
+ }
+ pr_err("INFO: %s detected expedited stalls on CPUs: {",
+ rsp->name);
+ for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
+ rdp = per_cpu_ptr(rsp->rda, cpu);
+
+ if (rdp->exp_done)
+ continue;
+ pr_cont(" %d", cpu);
+ }
+ pr_cont(" } %lu jiffies s: %lu\n",
+ jiffies - jiffies_start, rsp->expedited_sequence);
+ for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
+ rdp = per_cpu_ptr(rsp->rda, cpu);
+
+ if (rdp->exp_done)
+ continue;
+ dump_cpu_task(cpu);
+ }
+ jiffies_stall = 3 * rcu_jiffies_till_stall_check() + 3;
+ }
+}
+
/**
* synchronize_sched_expedited - Brute-force RCU-sched grace period
*
@@ -3281,58 +3524,21 @@
* restructure your code to batch your updates, and then use a single
* synchronize_sched() instead.
*
- * This implementation can be thought of as an application of ticket
- * locking to RCU, with sync_sched_expedited_started and
- * sync_sched_expedited_done taking on the roles of the halves
- * of the ticket-lock word. Each task atomically increments
- * sync_sched_expedited_started upon entry, snapshotting the old value,
- * then attempts to stop all the CPUs. If this succeeds, then each
- * CPU will have executed a context switch, resulting in an RCU-sched
- * grace period. We are then done, so we use atomic_cmpxchg() to
- * update sync_sched_expedited_done to match our snapshot -- but
- * only if someone else has not already advanced past our snapshot.
- *
- * On the other hand, if try_stop_cpus() fails, we check the value
- * of sync_sched_expedited_done. If it has advanced past our
- * initial snapshot, then someone else must have forced a grace period
- * some time after we took our snapshot. In this case, our work is
- * done for us, and we can simply return. Otherwise, we try again,
- * but keep our initial snapshot for purposes of checking for someone
- * doing our work for us.
- *
- * If we fail too many times in a row, we fall back to synchronize_sched().
+ * This implementation can be thought of as an application of sequence
+ * locking to expedited grace periods, but using the sequence counter to
+ * determine when someone else has already done the work instead of for
+ * retrying readers.
*/
void synchronize_sched_expedited(void)
{
- cpumask_var_t cm;
- bool cma = false;
int cpu;
- long firstsnap, s, snap;
- int trycount = 0;
+ unsigned long s;
+ struct rcu_node *rnp;
struct rcu_state *rsp = &rcu_sched_state;
- /*
- * If we are in danger of counter wrap, just do synchronize_sched().
- * By allowing sync_sched_expedited_started to advance no more than
- * ULONG_MAX/8 ahead of sync_sched_expedited_done, we are ensuring
- * that more than 3.5 billion CPUs would be required to force a
- * counter wrap on a 32-bit system. Quite a few more CPUs would of
- * course be required on a 64-bit system.
- */
- if (ULONG_CMP_GE((ulong)atomic_long_read(&rsp->expedited_start),
- (ulong)atomic_long_read(&rsp->expedited_done) +
- ULONG_MAX / 8)) {
- wait_rcu_gp(call_rcu_sched);
- atomic_long_inc(&rsp->expedited_wrap);
- return;
- }
+ /* Take a snapshot of the sequence number. */
+ s = rcu_exp_gp_seq_snap(rsp);
- /*
- * Take a ticket. Note that atomic_inc_return() implies a
- * full memory barrier.
- */
- snap = atomic_long_inc_return(&rsp->expedited_start);
- firstsnap = snap;
if (!try_get_online_cpus()) {
/* CPU hotplug operation in flight, fall back to normal GP. */
wait_rcu_gp(call_rcu_sched);
@@ -3341,100 +3547,38 @@
}
WARN_ON_ONCE(cpu_is_offline(raw_smp_processor_id()));
- /* Offline CPUs, idle CPUs, and any CPU we run on are quiescent. */
- cma = zalloc_cpumask_var(&cm, GFP_KERNEL);
- if (cma) {
- cpumask_copy(cm, cpu_online_mask);
- cpumask_clear_cpu(raw_smp_processor_id(), cm);
- for_each_cpu(cpu, cm) {
- struct rcu_dynticks *rdtp = &per_cpu(rcu_dynticks, cpu);
-
- if (!(atomic_add_return(0, &rdtp->dynticks) & 0x1))
- cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, cm);
- }
- if (cpumask_weight(cm) == 0)
- goto all_cpus_idle;
- }
-
- /*
- * Each pass through the following loop attempts to force a
- * context switch on each CPU.
- */
- while (try_stop_cpus(cma ? cm : cpu_online_mask,
- synchronize_sched_expedited_cpu_stop,
- NULL) == -EAGAIN) {
+ rnp = exp_funnel_lock(rsp, s);
+ if (rnp == NULL) {
put_online_cpus();
- atomic_long_inc(&rsp->expedited_tryfail);
-
- /* Check to see if someone else did our work for us. */
- s = atomic_long_read(&rsp->expedited_done);
- if (ULONG_CMP_GE((ulong)s, (ulong)firstsnap)) {
- /* ensure test happens before caller kfree */
- smp_mb__before_atomic(); /* ^^^ */
- atomic_long_inc(&rsp->expedited_workdone1);
- free_cpumask_var(cm);
- return;
- }
-
- /* No joy, try again later. Or just synchronize_sched(). */
- if (trycount++ < 10) {
- udelay(trycount * num_online_cpus());
- } else {
- wait_rcu_gp(call_rcu_sched);
- atomic_long_inc(&rsp->expedited_normal);
- free_cpumask_var(cm);
- return;
- }
-
- /* Recheck to see if someone else did our work for us. */
- s = atomic_long_read(&rsp->expedited_done);
- if (ULONG_CMP_GE((ulong)s, (ulong)firstsnap)) {
- /* ensure test happens before caller kfree */
- smp_mb__before_atomic(); /* ^^^ */
- atomic_long_inc(&rsp->expedited_workdone2);
- free_cpumask_var(cm);
- return;
- }
-
- /*
- * Refetching sync_sched_expedited_started allows later
- * callers to piggyback on our grace period. We retry
- * after they started, so our grace period works for them,
- * and they started after our first try, so their grace
- * period works for us.
- */
- if (!try_get_online_cpus()) {
- /* CPU hotplug operation in flight, use normal GP. */
- wait_rcu_gp(call_rcu_sched);
- atomic_long_inc(&rsp->expedited_normal);
- free_cpumask_var(cm);
- return;
- }
- snap = atomic_long_read(&rsp->expedited_start);
- smp_mb(); /* ensure read is before try_stop_cpus(). */
+ return; /* Someone else did our work for us. */
}
- atomic_long_inc(&rsp->expedited_stoppedcpus);
-all_cpus_idle:
- free_cpumask_var(cm);
+ rcu_exp_gp_seq_start(rsp);
- /*
- * Everyone up to our most recent fetch is covered by our grace
- * period. Update the counter, but only if our work is still
- * relevant -- which it won't be if someone who started later
- * than we did already did their update.
- */
- do {
- atomic_long_inc(&rsp->expedited_done_tries);
- s = atomic_long_read(&rsp->expedited_done);
- if (ULONG_CMP_GE((ulong)s, (ulong)snap)) {
- /* ensure test happens before caller kfree */
- smp_mb__before_atomic(); /* ^^^ */
- atomic_long_inc(&rsp->expedited_done_lost);
- break;
- }
- } while (atomic_long_cmpxchg(&rsp->expedited_done, s, snap) != s);
- atomic_long_inc(&rsp->expedited_done_exit);
+ /* Stop each CPU that is online, non-idle, and not us. */
+ init_waitqueue_head(&rsp->expedited_wq);
+ atomic_set(&rsp->expedited_need_qs, 1); /* Extra count avoids race. */
+ for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
+ struct rcu_data *rdp = per_cpu_ptr(rsp->rda, cpu);
+ struct rcu_dynticks *rdtp = &per_cpu(rcu_dynticks, cpu);
+
+ rdp->exp_done = false;
+
+ /* Skip our CPU and any idle CPUs. */
+ if (raw_smp_processor_id() == cpu ||
+ !(atomic_add_return(0, &rdtp->dynticks) & 0x1))
+ continue;
+ atomic_inc(&rsp->expedited_need_qs);
+ stop_one_cpu_nowait(cpu, synchronize_sched_expedited_cpu_stop,
+ rdp, &rdp->exp_stop_work);
+ }
+
+ /* Remove extra count and, if necessary, wait for CPUs to stop. */
+ if (!atomic_dec_and_test(&rsp->expedited_need_qs))
+ synchronize_sched_expedited_wait(rsp);
+
+ rcu_exp_gp_seq_end(rsp);
+ mutex_unlock(&rnp->exp_funnel_mutex);
put_online_cpus();
}
@@ -3571,10 +3715,10 @@
struct rcu_state *rsp = rdp->rsp;
if (atomic_dec_and_test(&rsp->barrier_cpu_count)) {
- _rcu_barrier_trace(rsp, "LastCB", -1, rsp->n_barrier_done);
+ _rcu_barrier_trace(rsp, "LastCB", -1, rsp->barrier_sequence);
complete(&rsp->barrier_completion);
} else {
- _rcu_barrier_trace(rsp, "CB", -1, rsp->n_barrier_done);
+ _rcu_barrier_trace(rsp, "CB", -1, rsp->barrier_sequence);
}
}
@@ -3586,7 +3730,7 @@
struct rcu_state *rsp = type;
struct rcu_data *rdp = raw_cpu_ptr(rsp->rda);
- _rcu_barrier_trace(rsp, "IRQ", -1, rsp->n_barrier_done);
+ _rcu_barrier_trace(rsp, "IRQ", -1, rsp->barrier_sequence);
atomic_inc(&rsp->barrier_cpu_count);
rsp->call(&rdp->barrier_head, rcu_barrier_callback);
}
@@ -3599,55 +3743,24 @@
{
int cpu;
struct rcu_data *rdp;
- unsigned long snap = READ_ONCE(rsp->n_barrier_done);
- unsigned long snap_done;
+ unsigned long s = rcu_seq_snap(&rsp->barrier_sequence);
- _rcu_barrier_trace(rsp, "Begin", -1, snap);
+ _rcu_barrier_trace(rsp, "Begin", -1, s);
/* Take mutex to serialize concurrent rcu_barrier() requests. */
mutex_lock(&rsp->barrier_mutex);
- /*
- * Ensure that all prior references, including to ->n_barrier_done,
- * are ordered before the _rcu_barrier() machinery.
- */
- smp_mb(); /* See above block comment. */
-
- /*
- * Recheck ->n_barrier_done to see if others did our work for us.
- * This means checking ->n_barrier_done for an even-to-odd-to-even
- * transition. The "if" expression below therefore rounds the old
- * value up to the next even number and adds two before comparing.
- */
- snap_done = rsp->n_barrier_done;
- _rcu_barrier_trace(rsp, "Check", -1, snap_done);
-
- /*
- * If the value in snap is odd, we needed to wait for the current
- * rcu_barrier() to complete, then wait for the next one, in other
- * words, we need the value of snap_done to be three larger than
- * the value of snap. On the other hand, if the value in snap is
- * even, we only had to wait for the next rcu_barrier() to complete,
- * in other words, we need the value of snap_done to be only two
- * greater than the value of snap. The "(snap + 3) & ~0x1" computes
- * this for us (thank you, Linus!).
- */
- if (ULONG_CMP_GE(snap_done, (snap + 3) & ~0x1)) {
- _rcu_barrier_trace(rsp, "EarlyExit", -1, snap_done);
+ /* Did someone else do our work for us? */
+ if (rcu_seq_done(&rsp->barrier_sequence, s)) {
+ _rcu_barrier_trace(rsp, "EarlyExit", -1, rsp->barrier_sequence);
smp_mb(); /* caller's subsequent code after above check. */
mutex_unlock(&rsp->barrier_mutex);
return;
}
- /*
- * Increment ->n_barrier_done to avoid duplicate work. Use
- * WRITE_ONCE() to prevent the compiler from speculating
- * the increment to precede the early-exit check.
- */
- WRITE_ONCE(rsp->n_barrier_done, rsp->n_barrier_done + 1);
- WARN_ON_ONCE((rsp->n_barrier_done & 0x1) != 1);
- _rcu_barrier_trace(rsp, "Inc1", -1, rsp->n_barrier_done);
- smp_mb(); /* Order ->n_barrier_done increment with below mechanism. */
+ /* Mark the start of the barrier operation. */
+ rcu_seq_start(&rsp->barrier_sequence);
+ _rcu_barrier_trace(rsp, "Inc1", -1, rsp->barrier_sequence);
/*
* Initialize the count to one rather than to zero in order to
@@ -3671,10 +3784,10 @@
if (rcu_is_nocb_cpu(cpu)) {
if (!rcu_nocb_cpu_needs_barrier(rsp, cpu)) {
_rcu_barrier_trace(rsp, "OfflineNoCB", cpu,
- rsp->n_barrier_done);
+ rsp->barrier_sequence);
} else {
_rcu_barrier_trace(rsp, "OnlineNoCB", cpu,
- rsp->n_barrier_done);
+ rsp->barrier_sequence);
smp_mb__before_atomic();
atomic_inc(&rsp->barrier_cpu_count);
__call_rcu(&rdp->barrier_head,
@@ -3682,11 +3795,11 @@
}
} else if (READ_ONCE(rdp->qlen)) {
_rcu_barrier_trace(rsp, "OnlineQ", cpu,
- rsp->n_barrier_done);
+ rsp->barrier_sequence);
smp_call_function_single(cpu, rcu_barrier_func, rsp, 1);
} else {
_rcu_barrier_trace(rsp, "OnlineNQ", cpu,
- rsp->n_barrier_done);
+ rsp->barrier_sequence);
}
}
put_online_cpus();
@@ -3698,16 +3811,13 @@
if (atomic_dec_and_test(&rsp->barrier_cpu_count))
complete(&rsp->barrier_completion);
- /* Increment ->n_barrier_done to prevent duplicate work. */
- smp_mb(); /* Keep increment after above mechanism. */
- WRITE_ONCE(rsp->n_barrier_done, rsp->n_barrier_done + 1);
- WARN_ON_ONCE((rsp->n_barrier_done & 0x1) != 0);
- _rcu_barrier_trace(rsp, "Inc2", -1, rsp->n_barrier_done);
- smp_mb(); /* Keep increment before caller's subsequent code. */
-
/* Wait for all rcu_barrier_callback() callbacks to be invoked. */
wait_for_completion(&rsp->barrier_completion);
+ /* Mark the end of the barrier operation. */
+ _rcu_barrier_trace(rsp, "Inc2", -1, rsp->barrier_sequence);
+ rcu_seq_end(&rsp->barrier_sequence);
+
/* Other rcu_barrier() invocations can now safely proceed. */
mutex_unlock(&rsp->barrier_mutex);
}
@@ -3770,6 +3880,7 @@
WARN_ON_ONCE(atomic_read(&rdp->dynticks->dynticks) != 1);
rdp->cpu = cpu;
rdp->rsp = rsp;
+ mutex_init(&rdp->exp_funnel_mutex);
rcu_boot_init_nocb_percpu_data(rdp);
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rnp->lock, flags);
}
@@ -3961,22 +4072,22 @@
* Compute the per-level fanout, either using the exact fanout specified
* or balancing the tree, depending on the rcu_fanout_exact boot parameter.
*/
-static void __init rcu_init_levelspread(struct rcu_state *rsp)
+static void __init rcu_init_levelspread(int *levelspread, const int *levelcnt)
{
int i;
if (rcu_fanout_exact) {
- rsp->levelspread[rcu_num_lvls - 1] = rcu_fanout_leaf;
+ levelspread[rcu_num_lvls - 1] = rcu_fanout_leaf;
for (i = rcu_num_lvls - 2; i >= 0; i--)
- rsp->levelspread[i] = RCU_FANOUT;
+ levelspread[i] = RCU_FANOUT;
} else {
int ccur;
int cprv;
cprv = nr_cpu_ids;
for (i = rcu_num_lvls - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
- ccur = rsp->levelcnt[i];
- rsp->levelspread[i] = (cprv + ccur - 1) / ccur;
+ ccur = levelcnt[i];
+ levelspread[i] = (cprv + ccur - 1) / ccur;
cprv = ccur;
}
}
@@ -3988,23 +4099,20 @@
static void __init rcu_init_one(struct rcu_state *rsp,
struct rcu_data __percpu *rda)
{
- static const char * const buf[] = {
- "rcu_node_0",
- "rcu_node_1",
- "rcu_node_2",
- "rcu_node_3" }; /* Match MAX_RCU_LVLS */
- static const char * const fqs[] = {
- "rcu_node_fqs_0",
- "rcu_node_fqs_1",
- "rcu_node_fqs_2",
- "rcu_node_fqs_3" }; /* Match MAX_RCU_LVLS */
+ static const char * const buf[] = RCU_NODE_NAME_INIT;
+ static const char * const fqs[] = RCU_FQS_NAME_INIT;
+ static const char * const exp[] = RCU_EXP_NAME_INIT;
+ static const char * const exp_sched[] = RCU_EXP_SCHED_NAME_INIT;
static u8 fl_mask = 0x1;
+
+ int levelcnt[RCU_NUM_LVLS]; /* # nodes in each level. */
+ int levelspread[RCU_NUM_LVLS]; /* kids/node in each level. */
int cpustride = 1;
int i;
int j;
struct rcu_node *rnp;
- BUILD_BUG_ON(MAX_RCU_LVLS > ARRAY_SIZE(buf)); /* Fix buf[] init! */
+ BUILD_BUG_ON(RCU_NUM_LVLS > ARRAY_SIZE(buf)); /* Fix buf[] init! */
/* Silence gcc 4.8 false positive about array index out of range. */
if (rcu_num_lvls <= 0 || rcu_num_lvls > RCU_NUM_LVLS)
@@ -4013,19 +4121,19 @@
/* Initialize the level-tracking arrays. */
for (i = 0; i < rcu_num_lvls; i++)
- rsp->levelcnt[i] = num_rcu_lvl[i];
+ levelcnt[i] = num_rcu_lvl[i];
for (i = 1; i < rcu_num_lvls; i++)
- rsp->level[i] = rsp->level[i - 1] + rsp->levelcnt[i - 1];
- rcu_init_levelspread(rsp);
+ rsp->level[i] = rsp->level[i - 1] + levelcnt[i - 1];
+ rcu_init_levelspread(levelspread, levelcnt);
rsp->flavor_mask = fl_mask;
fl_mask <<= 1;
/* Initialize the elements themselves, starting from the leaves. */
for (i = rcu_num_lvls - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
- cpustride *= rsp->levelspread[i];
+ cpustride *= levelspread[i];
rnp = rsp->level[i];
- for (j = 0; j < rsp->levelcnt[i]; j++, rnp++) {
+ for (j = 0; j < levelcnt[i]; j++, rnp++) {
raw_spin_lock_init(&rnp->lock);
lockdep_set_class_and_name(&rnp->lock,
&rcu_node_class[i], buf[i]);
@@ -4045,14 +4153,23 @@
rnp->grpmask = 0;
rnp->parent = NULL;
} else {
- rnp->grpnum = j % rsp->levelspread[i - 1];
+ rnp->grpnum = j % levelspread[i - 1];
rnp->grpmask = 1UL << rnp->grpnum;
rnp->parent = rsp->level[i - 1] +
- j / rsp->levelspread[i - 1];
+ j / levelspread[i - 1];
}
rnp->level = i;
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&rnp->blkd_tasks);
rcu_init_one_nocb(rnp);
+ mutex_init(&rnp->exp_funnel_mutex);
+ if (rsp == &rcu_sched_state)
+ lockdep_set_class_and_name(
+ &rnp->exp_funnel_mutex,
+ &rcu_exp_sched_class[i], exp_sched[i]);
+ else
+ lockdep_set_class_and_name(
+ &rnp->exp_funnel_mutex,
+ &rcu_exp_class[i], exp[i]);
}
}
@@ -4076,9 +4193,7 @@
{
ulong d;
int i;
- int j;
- int n = nr_cpu_ids;
- int rcu_capacity[MAX_RCU_LVLS + 1];
+ int rcu_capacity[RCU_NUM_LVLS];
/*
* Initialize any unspecified boot parameters.
@@ -4101,47 +4216,49 @@
rcu_fanout_leaf, nr_cpu_ids);
/*
- * Compute number of nodes that can be handled an rcu_node tree
- * with the given number of levels. Setting rcu_capacity[0] makes
- * some of the arithmetic easier.
- */
- rcu_capacity[0] = 1;
- rcu_capacity[1] = rcu_fanout_leaf;
- for (i = 2; i <= MAX_RCU_LVLS; i++)
- rcu_capacity[i] = rcu_capacity[i - 1] * RCU_FANOUT;
-
- /*
* The boot-time rcu_fanout_leaf parameter is only permitted
* to increase the leaf-level fanout, not decrease it. Of course,
* the leaf-level fanout cannot exceed the number of bits in
- * the rcu_node masks. Finally, the tree must be able to accommodate
- * the configured number of CPUs. Complain and fall back to the
- * compile-time values if these limits are exceeded.
+ * the rcu_node masks. Complain and fall back to the compile-
+ * time values if these limits are exceeded.
*/
if (rcu_fanout_leaf < RCU_FANOUT_LEAF ||
- rcu_fanout_leaf > sizeof(unsigned long) * 8 ||
- n > rcu_capacity[MAX_RCU_LVLS]) {
+ rcu_fanout_leaf > sizeof(unsigned long) * 8) {
+ rcu_fanout_leaf = RCU_FANOUT_LEAF;
WARN_ON(1);
return;
}
+ /*
+ * Compute number of nodes that can be handled an rcu_node tree
+ * with the given number of levels.
+ */
+ rcu_capacity[0] = rcu_fanout_leaf;
+ for (i = 1; i < RCU_NUM_LVLS; i++)
+ rcu_capacity[i] = rcu_capacity[i - 1] * RCU_FANOUT;
+
+ /*
+ * The tree must be able to accommodate the configured number of CPUs.
+ * If this limit is exceeded than we have a serious problem elsewhere.
+ */
+ if (nr_cpu_ids > rcu_capacity[RCU_NUM_LVLS - 1])
+ panic("rcu_init_geometry: rcu_capacity[] is too small");
+
+ /* Calculate the number of levels in the tree. */
+ for (i = 0; nr_cpu_ids > rcu_capacity[i]; i++) {
+ }
+ rcu_num_lvls = i + 1;
+
/* Calculate the number of rcu_nodes at each level of the tree. */
- for (i = 1; i <= MAX_RCU_LVLS; i++)
- if (n <= rcu_capacity[i]) {
- for (j = 0; j <= i; j++)
- num_rcu_lvl[j] =
- DIV_ROUND_UP(n, rcu_capacity[i - j]);
- rcu_num_lvls = i;
- for (j = i + 1; j <= MAX_RCU_LVLS; j++)
- num_rcu_lvl[j] = 0;
- break;
- }
+ for (i = 0; i < rcu_num_lvls; i++) {
+ int cap = rcu_capacity[(rcu_num_lvls - 1) - i];
+ num_rcu_lvl[i] = DIV_ROUND_UP(nr_cpu_ids, cap);
+ }
/* Calculate the total number of rcu_node structures. */
rcu_num_nodes = 0;
- for (i = 0; i <= MAX_RCU_LVLS; i++)
+ for (i = 0; i < rcu_num_lvls; i++)
rcu_num_nodes += num_rcu_lvl[i];
- rcu_num_nodes -= n;
}
/*
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.h b/kernel/rcu/tree.h
index 4adb7ca..0412030 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.h
@@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
#include <linux/threads.h>
#include <linux/cpumask.h>
#include <linux/seqlock.h>
+#include <linux/stop_machine.h>
/*
* Define shape of hierarchy based on NR_CPUS, CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT, and
@@ -36,8 +37,6 @@
* Of course, your mileage may vary.
*/
-#define MAX_RCU_LVLS 4
-
#ifdef CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT
#define RCU_FANOUT CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT
#else /* #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT */
@@ -66,38 +65,53 @@
#if NR_CPUS <= RCU_FANOUT_1
# define RCU_NUM_LVLS 1
# define NUM_RCU_LVL_0 1
-# define NUM_RCU_LVL_1 (NR_CPUS)
-# define NUM_RCU_LVL_2 0
-# define NUM_RCU_LVL_3 0
-# define NUM_RCU_LVL_4 0
+# define NUM_RCU_NODES NUM_RCU_LVL_0
+# define NUM_RCU_LVL_INIT { NUM_RCU_LVL_0 }
+# define RCU_NODE_NAME_INIT { "rcu_node_0" }
+# define RCU_FQS_NAME_INIT { "rcu_node_fqs_0" }
+# define RCU_EXP_NAME_INIT { "rcu_node_exp_0" }
+# define RCU_EXP_SCHED_NAME_INIT \
+ { "rcu_node_exp_sched_0" }
#elif NR_CPUS <= RCU_FANOUT_2
# define RCU_NUM_LVLS 2
# define NUM_RCU_LVL_0 1
# define NUM_RCU_LVL_1 DIV_ROUND_UP(NR_CPUS, RCU_FANOUT_1)
-# define NUM_RCU_LVL_2 (NR_CPUS)
-# define NUM_RCU_LVL_3 0
-# define NUM_RCU_LVL_4 0
+# define NUM_RCU_NODES (NUM_RCU_LVL_0 + NUM_RCU_LVL_1)
+# define NUM_RCU_LVL_INIT { NUM_RCU_LVL_0, NUM_RCU_LVL_1 }
+# define RCU_NODE_NAME_INIT { "rcu_node_0", "rcu_node_1" }
+# define RCU_FQS_NAME_INIT { "rcu_node_fqs_0", "rcu_node_fqs_1" }
+# define RCU_EXP_NAME_INIT { "rcu_node_exp_0", "rcu_node_exp_1" }
+# define RCU_EXP_SCHED_NAME_INIT \
+ { "rcu_node_exp_sched_0", "rcu_node_exp_sched_1" }
#elif NR_CPUS <= RCU_FANOUT_3
# define RCU_NUM_LVLS 3
# define NUM_RCU_LVL_0 1
# define NUM_RCU_LVL_1 DIV_ROUND_UP(NR_CPUS, RCU_FANOUT_2)
# define NUM_RCU_LVL_2 DIV_ROUND_UP(NR_CPUS, RCU_FANOUT_1)
-# define NUM_RCU_LVL_3 (NR_CPUS)
-# define NUM_RCU_LVL_4 0
+# define NUM_RCU_NODES (NUM_RCU_LVL_0 + NUM_RCU_LVL_1 + NUM_RCU_LVL_2)
+# define NUM_RCU_LVL_INIT { NUM_RCU_LVL_0, NUM_RCU_LVL_1, NUM_RCU_LVL_2 }
+# define RCU_NODE_NAME_INIT { "rcu_node_0", "rcu_node_1", "rcu_node_2" }
+# define RCU_FQS_NAME_INIT { "rcu_node_fqs_0", "rcu_node_fqs_1", "rcu_node_fqs_2" }
+# define RCU_EXP_NAME_INIT { "rcu_node_exp_0", "rcu_node_exp_1", "rcu_node_exp_2" }
+# define RCU_EXP_SCHED_NAME_INIT \
+ { "rcu_node_exp_sched_0", "rcu_node_exp_sched_1", "rcu_node_exp_sched_2" }
#elif NR_CPUS <= RCU_FANOUT_4
# define RCU_NUM_LVLS 4
# define NUM_RCU_LVL_0 1
# define NUM_RCU_LVL_1 DIV_ROUND_UP(NR_CPUS, RCU_FANOUT_3)
# define NUM_RCU_LVL_2 DIV_ROUND_UP(NR_CPUS, RCU_FANOUT_2)
# define NUM_RCU_LVL_3 DIV_ROUND_UP(NR_CPUS, RCU_FANOUT_1)
-# define NUM_RCU_LVL_4 (NR_CPUS)
+# define NUM_RCU_NODES (NUM_RCU_LVL_0 + NUM_RCU_LVL_1 + NUM_RCU_LVL_2 + NUM_RCU_LVL_3)
+# define NUM_RCU_LVL_INIT { NUM_RCU_LVL_0, NUM_RCU_LVL_1, NUM_RCU_LVL_2, NUM_RCU_LVL_3 }
+# define RCU_NODE_NAME_INIT { "rcu_node_0", "rcu_node_1", "rcu_node_2", "rcu_node_3" }
+# define RCU_FQS_NAME_INIT { "rcu_node_fqs_0", "rcu_node_fqs_1", "rcu_node_fqs_2", "rcu_node_fqs_3" }
+# define RCU_EXP_NAME_INIT { "rcu_node_exp_0", "rcu_node_exp_1", "rcu_node_exp_2", "rcu_node_exp_3" }
+# define RCU_EXP_SCHED_NAME_INIT \
+ { "rcu_node_exp_sched_0", "rcu_node_exp_sched_1", "rcu_node_exp_sched_2", "rcu_node_exp_sched_3" }
#else
# error "CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT insufficient for NR_CPUS"
#endif /* #if (NR_CPUS) <= RCU_FANOUT_1 */
-#define RCU_SUM (NUM_RCU_LVL_0 + NUM_RCU_LVL_1 + NUM_RCU_LVL_2 + NUM_RCU_LVL_3 + NUM_RCU_LVL_4)
-#define NUM_RCU_NODES (RCU_SUM - NR_CPUS)
-
extern int rcu_num_lvls;
extern int rcu_num_nodes;
@@ -236,6 +250,8 @@
int need_future_gp[2];
/* Counts of upcoming no-CB GP requests. */
raw_spinlock_t fqslock ____cacheline_internodealigned_in_smp;
+
+ struct mutex exp_funnel_mutex ____cacheline_internodealigned_in_smp;
} ____cacheline_internodealigned_in_smp;
/*
@@ -287,12 +303,13 @@
bool gpwrap; /* Possible gpnum/completed wrap. */
struct rcu_node *mynode; /* This CPU's leaf of hierarchy */
unsigned long grpmask; /* Mask to apply to leaf qsmask. */
-#ifdef CONFIG_RCU_CPU_STALL_INFO
unsigned long ticks_this_gp; /* The number of scheduling-clock */
/* ticks this CPU has handled */
/* during and after the last grace */
/* period it is aware of. */
-#endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_CPU_STALL_INFO */
+ struct cpu_stop_work exp_stop_work;
+ /* Expedited grace-period control */
+ /* for CPU stopping. */
/* 2) batch handling */
/*
@@ -355,11 +372,13 @@
unsigned long n_rp_nocb_defer_wakeup;
unsigned long n_rp_need_nothing;
- /* 6) _rcu_barrier() and OOM callbacks. */
+ /* 6) _rcu_barrier(), OOM callbacks, and expediting. */
struct rcu_head barrier_head;
#ifdef CONFIG_RCU_FAST_NO_HZ
struct rcu_head oom_head;
#endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_FAST_NO_HZ */
+ struct mutex exp_funnel_mutex;
+ bool exp_done; /* Expedited QS for this CPU? */
/* 7) Callback offloading. */
#ifdef CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU
@@ -387,9 +406,7 @@
#endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU */
/* 8) RCU CPU stall data. */
-#ifdef CONFIG_RCU_CPU_STALL_INFO
unsigned int softirq_snap; /* Snapshot of softirq activity. */
-#endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_CPU_STALL_INFO */
int cpu;
struct rcu_state *rsp;
@@ -442,9 +459,9 @@
*/
struct rcu_state {
struct rcu_node node[NUM_RCU_NODES]; /* Hierarchy. */
- struct rcu_node *level[RCU_NUM_LVLS]; /* Hierarchy levels. */
- u32 levelcnt[MAX_RCU_LVLS + 1]; /* # nodes in each level. */
- u8 levelspread[RCU_NUM_LVLS]; /* kids/node in each level. */
+ struct rcu_node *level[RCU_NUM_LVLS + 1];
+ /* Hierarchy levels (+1 to */
+ /* shut bogus gcc warning) */
u8 flavor_mask; /* bit in flavor mask. */
struct rcu_data __percpu *rda; /* pointer of percu rcu_data. */
void (*call)(struct rcu_head *head, /* call_rcu() flavor. */
@@ -479,21 +496,18 @@
struct mutex barrier_mutex; /* Guards barrier fields. */
atomic_t barrier_cpu_count; /* # CPUs waiting on. */
struct completion barrier_completion; /* Wake at barrier end. */
- unsigned long n_barrier_done; /* ++ at start and end of */
+ unsigned long barrier_sequence; /* ++ at start and end of */
/* _rcu_barrier(). */
/* End of fields guarded by barrier_mutex. */
- atomic_long_t expedited_start; /* Starting ticket. */
- atomic_long_t expedited_done; /* Done ticket. */
- atomic_long_t expedited_wrap; /* # near-wrap incidents. */
- atomic_long_t expedited_tryfail; /* # acquisition failures. */
+ unsigned long expedited_sequence; /* Take a ticket. */
+ atomic_long_t expedited_workdone0; /* # done by others #0. */
atomic_long_t expedited_workdone1; /* # done by others #1. */
atomic_long_t expedited_workdone2; /* # done by others #2. */
+ atomic_long_t expedited_workdone3; /* # done by others #3. */
atomic_long_t expedited_normal; /* # fallbacks to normal. */
- atomic_long_t expedited_stoppedcpus; /* # successful stop_cpus. */
- atomic_long_t expedited_done_tries; /* # tries to update _done. */
- atomic_long_t expedited_done_lost; /* # times beaten to _done. */
- atomic_long_t expedited_done_exit; /* # times exited _done loop. */
+ atomic_t expedited_need_qs; /* # CPUs left to check in. */
+ wait_queue_head_t expedited_wq; /* Wait for check-ins. */
unsigned long jiffies_force_qs; /* Time at which to invoke */
/* force_quiescent_state(). */
@@ -527,7 +541,11 @@
/* Values for rcu_state structure's gp_flags field. */
#define RCU_GP_WAIT_INIT 0 /* Initial state. */
#define RCU_GP_WAIT_GPS 1 /* Wait for grace-period start. */
-#define RCU_GP_WAIT_FQS 2 /* Wait for force-quiescent-state time. */
+#define RCU_GP_DONE_GPS 2 /* Wait done for grace-period start. */
+#define RCU_GP_WAIT_FQS 3 /* Wait for force-quiescent-state time. */
+#define RCU_GP_DOING_FQS 4 /* Wait done for force-quiescent-state time. */
+#define RCU_GP_CLEANUP 5 /* Grace-period cleanup started. */
+#define RCU_GP_CLEANED 6 /* Grace-period cleanup complete. */
extern struct list_head rcu_struct_flavors;
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
index 013485f..b2bf396 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
@@ -82,10 +82,8 @@
pr_info("\tRCU lockdep checking is enabled.\n");
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RCU_TORTURE_TEST_RUNNABLE))
pr_info("\tRCU torture testing starts during boot.\n");
- if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RCU_CPU_STALL_INFO))
- pr_info("\tAdditional per-CPU info printed with stalls.\n");
- if (NUM_RCU_LVL_4 != 0)
- pr_info("\tFour-level hierarchy is enabled.\n");
+ if (RCU_NUM_LVLS >= 4)
+ pr_info("\tFour(or more)-level hierarchy is enabled.\n");
if (RCU_FANOUT_LEAF != 16)
pr_info("\tBuild-time adjustment of leaf fanout to %d.\n",
RCU_FANOUT_LEAF);
@@ -418,8 +416,6 @@
rcu_print_detail_task_stall_rnp(rnp);
}
-#ifdef CONFIG_RCU_CPU_STALL_INFO
-
static void rcu_print_task_stall_begin(struct rcu_node *rnp)
{
pr_err("\tTasks blocked on level-%d rcu_node (CPUs %d-%d):",
@@ -431,18 +427,6 @@
pr_cont("\n");
}
-#else /* #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_CPU_STALL_INFO */
-
-static void rcu_print_task_stall_begin(struct rcu_node *rnp)
-{
-}
-
-static void rcu_print_task_stall_end(void)
-{
-}
-
-#endif /* #else #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_CPU_STALL_INFO */
-
/*
* Scan the current list of tasks blocked within RCU read-side critical
* sections, printing out the tid of each.
@@ -538,10 +522,10 @@
*/
void synchronize_rcu(void)
{
- rcu_lockdep_assert(!lock_is_held(&rcu_bh_lock_map) &&
- !lock_is_held(&rcu_lock_map) &&
- !lock_is_held(&rcu_sched_lock_map),
- "Illegal synchronize_rcu() in RCU read-side critical section");
+ RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(lock_is_held(&rcu_bh_lock_map) ||
+ lock_is_held(&rcu_lock_map) ||
+ lock_is_held(&rcu_sched_lock_map),
+ "Illegal synchronize_rcu() in RCU read-side critical section");
if (!rcu_scheduler_active)
return;
if (rcu_gp_is_expedited())
@@ -552,8 +536,6 @@
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(synchronize_rcu);
static DECLARE_WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD(sync_rcu_preempt_exp_wq);
-static unsigned long sync_rcu_preempt_exp_count;
-static DEFINE_MUTEX(sync_rcu_preempt_exp_mutex);
/*
* Return non-zero if there are any tasks in RCU read-side critical
@@ -573,7 +555,7 @@
* for the current expedited grace period. Works only for preemptible
* RCU -- other RCU implementation use other means.
*
- * Caller must hold sync_rcu_preempt_exp_mutex.
+ * Caller must hold the root rcu_node's exp_funnel_mutex.
*/
static int sync_rcu_preempt_exp_done(struct rcu_node *rnp)
{
@@ -589,7 +571,7 @@
* recursively up the tree. (Calm down, calm down, we do the recursion
* iteratively!)
*
- * Caller must hold sync_rcu_preempt_exp_mutex.
+ * Caller must hold the root rcu_node's exp_funnel_mutex.
*/
static void rcu_report_exp_rnp(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_node *rnp,
bool wake)
@@ -628,7 +610,7 @@
* set the ->expmask bits on the leaf rcu_node structures to tell phase 2
* that work is needed here.
*
- * Caller must hold sync_rcu_preempt_exp_mutex.
+ * Caller must hold the root rcu_node's exp_funnel_mutex.
*/
static void
sync_rcu_preempt_exp_init1(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_node *rnp)
@@ -671,7 +653,7 @@
* invoke rcu_report_exp_rnp() to clear out the upper-level ->expmask bits,
* enabling rcu_read_unlock_special() to do the bit-clearing.
*
- * Caller must hold sync_rcu_preempt_exp_mutex.
+ * Caller must hold the root rcu_node's exp_funnel_mutex.
*/
static void
sync_rcu_preempt_exp_init2(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_node *rnp)
@@ -719,51 +701,17 @@
void synchronize_rcu_expedited(void)
{
struct rcu_node *rnp;
+ struct rcu_node *rnp_unlock;
struct rcu_state *rsp = rcu_state_p;
- unsigned long snap;
- int trycount = 0;
+ unsigned long s;
- smp_mb(); /* Caller's modifications seen first by other CPUs. */
- snap = READ_ONCE(sync_rcu_preempt_exp_count) + 1;
- smp_mb(); /* Above access cannot bleed into critical section. */
+ s = rcu_exp_gp_seq_snap(rsp);
- /*
- * Block CPU-hotplug operations. This means that any CPU-hotplug
- * operation that finds an rcu_node structure with tasks in the
- * process of being boosted will know that all tasks blocking
- * this expedited grace period will already be in the process of
- * being boosted. This simplifies the process of moving tasks
- * from leaf to root rcu_node structures.
- */
- if (!try_get_online_cpus()) {
- /* CPU-hotplug operation in flight, fall back to normal GP. */
- wait_rcu_gp(call_rcu);
- return;
- }
+ rnp_unlock = exp_funnel_lock(rsp, s);
+ if (rnp_unlock == NULL)
+ return; /* Someone else did our work for us. */
- /*
- * Acquire lock, falling back to synchronize_rcu() if too many
- * lock-acquisition failures. Of course, if someone does the
- * expedited grace period for us, just leave.
- */
- while (!mutex_trylock(&sync_rcu_preempt_exp_mutex)) {
- if (ULONG_CMP_LT(snap,
- READ_ONCE(sync_rcu_preempt_exp_count))) {
- put_online_cpus();
- goto mb_ret; /* Others did our work for us. */
- }
- if (trycount++ < 10) {
- udelay(trycount * num_online_cpus());
- } else {
- put_online_cpus();
- wait_rcu_gp(call_rcu);
- return;
- }
- }
- if (ULONG_CMP_LT(snap, READ_ONCE(sync_rcu_preempt_exp_count))) {
- put_online_cpus();
- goto unlock_mb_ret; /* Others did our work for us. */
- }
+ rcu_exp_gp_seq_start(rsp);
/* force all RCU readers onto ->blkd_tasks lists. */
synchronize_sched_expedited();
@@ -779,20 +727,14 @@
rcu_for_each_leaf_node(rsp, rnp)
sync_rcu_preempt_exp_init2(rsp, rnp);
- put_online_cpus();
-
/* Wait for snapshotted ->blkd_tasks lists to drain. */
rnp = rcu_get_root(rsp);
wait_event(sync_rcu_preempt_exp_wq,
sync_rcu_preempt_exp_done(rnp));
/* Clean up and exit. */
- smp_mb(); /* ensure expedited GP seen before counter increment. */
- WRITE_ONCE(sync_rcu_preempt_exp_count, sync_rcu_preempt_exp_count + 1);
-unlock_mb_ret:
- mutex_unlock(&sync_rcu_preempt_exp_mutex);
-mb_ret:
- smp_mb(); /* ensure subsequent action seen after grace period. */
+ rcu_exp_gp_seq_end(rsp);
+ mutex_unlock(&rnp_unlock->exp_funnel_mutex);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(synchronize_rcu_expedited);
@@ -1061,8 +1003,7 @@
}
/*
- * Priority-boosting kthread. One per leaf rcu_node and one for the
- * root rcu_node.
+ * Priority-boosting kthread, one per leaf rcu_node.
*/
static int rcu_boost_kthread(void *arg)
{
@@ -1680,12 +1621,10 @@
*/
atomic_set(&oom_callback_count, 1);
- get_online_cpus();
for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
smp_call_function_single(cpu, rcu_oom_notify_cpu, NULL, 1);
cond_resched_rcu_qs();
}
- put_online_cpus();
/* Unconditionally decrement: no need to wake ourselves up. */
atomic_dec(&oom_callback_count);
@@ -1706,8 +1645,6 @@
#endif /* #else #if !defined(CONFIG_RCU_FAST_NO_HZ) */
-#ifdef CONFIG_RCU_CPU_STALL_INFO
-
#ifdef CONFIG_RCU_FAST_NO_HZ
static void print_cpu_stall_fast_no_hz(char *cp, int cpu)
@@ -1796,33 +1733,6 @@
raw_cpu_inc(rsp->rda->ticks_this_gp);
}
-#else /* #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_CPU_STALL_INFO */
-
-static void print_cpu_stall_info_begin(void)
-{
- pr_cont(" {");
-}
-
-static void print_cpu_stall_info(struct rcu_state *rsp, int cpu)
-{
- pr_cont(" %d", cpu);
-}
-
-static void print_cpu_stall_info_end(void)
-{
- pr_cont("} ");
-}
-
-static void zero_cpu_stall_ticks(struct rcu_data *rdp)
-{
-}
-
-static void increment_cpu_stall_ticks(void)
-{
-}
-
-#endif /* #else #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_CPU_STALL_INFO */
-
#ifdef CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU
/*
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_trace.c b/kernel/rcu/tree_trace.c
index 3ea7ffc..6fc4c5f 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree_trace.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_trace.c
@@ -81,9 +81,9 @@
static int show_rcubarrier(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
{
struct rcu_state *rsp = (struct rcu_state *)m->private;
- seq_printf(m, "bcc: %d nbd: %lu\n",
+ seq_printf(m, "bcc: %d bseq: %lu\n",
atomic_read(&rsp->barrier_cpu_count),
- rsp->n_barrier_done);
+ rsp->barrier_sequence);
return 0;
}
@@ -185,18 +185,15 @@
{
struct rcu_state *rsp = (struct rcu_state *)m->private;
- seq_printf(m, "s=%lu d=%lu w=%lu tf=%lu wd1=%lu wd2=%lu n=%lu sc=%lu dt=%lu dl=%lu dx=%lu\n",
- atomic_long_read(&rsp->expedited_start),
- atomic_long_read(&rsp->expedited_done),
- atomic_long_read(&rsp->expedited_wrap),
- atomic_long_read(&rsp->expedited_tryfail),
+ seq_printf(m, "s=%lu wd0=%lu wd1=%lu wd2=%lu wd3=%lu n=%lu enq=%d sc=%lu\n",
+ rsp->expedited_sequence,
+ atomic_long_read(&rsp->expedited_workdone0),
atomic_long_read(&rsp->expedited_workdone1),
atomic_long_read(&rsp->expedited_workdone2),
+ atomic_long_read(&rsp->expedited_workdone3),
atomic_long_read(&rsp->expedited_normal),
- atomic_long_read(&rsp->expedited_stoppedcpus),
- atomic_long_read(&rsp->expedited_done_tries),
- atomic_long_read(&rsp->expedited_done_lost),
- atomic_long_read(&rsp->expedited_done_exit));
+ atomic_read(&rsp->expedited_need_qs),
+ rsp->expedited_sequence / 2);
return 0;
}
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/update.c b/kernel/rcu/update.c
index afaecb7..7a0b3bc 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/update.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/update.c
@@ -62,6 +62,55 @@
module_param(rcu_expedited, int, 0);
+#if defined(CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC) && defined(CONFIG_PREEMPT_COUNT)
+/**
+ * rcu_read_lock_sched_held() - might we be in RCU-sched read-side critical section?
+ *
+ * If CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC is selected, returns nonzero iff in an
+ * RCU-sched read-side critical section. In absence of
+ * CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC, this assumes we are in an RCU-sched read-side
+ * critical section unless it can prove otherwise. Note that disabling
+ * of preemption (including disabling irqs) counts as an RCU-sched
+ * read-side critical section. This is useful for debug checks in functions
+ * that required that they be called within an RCU-sched read-side
+ * critical section.
+ *
+ * Check debug_lockdep_rcu_enabled() to prevent false positives during boot
+ * and while lockdep is disabled.
+ *
+ * Note that if the CPU is in the idle loop from an RCU point of
+ * view (ie: that we are in the section between rcu_idle_enter() and
+ * rcu_idle_exit()) then rcu_read_lock_held() returns false even if the CPU
+ * did an rcu_read_lock(). The reason for this is that RCU ignores CPUs
+ * that are in such a section, considering these as in extended quiescent
+ * state, so such a CPU is effectively never in an RCU read-side critical
+ * section regardless of what RCU primitives it invokes. This state of
+ * affairs is required --- we need to keep an RCU-free window in idle
+ * where the CPU may possibly enter into low power mode. This way we can
+ * notice an extended quiescent state to other CPUs that started a grace
+ * period. Otherwise we would delay any grace period as long as we run in
+ * the idle task.
+ *
+ * Similarly, we avoid claiming an SRCU read lock held if the current
+ * CPU is offline.
+ */
+int rcu_read_lock_sched_held(void)
+{
+ int lockdep_opinion = 0;
+
+ if (!debug_lockdep_rcu_enabled())
+ return 1;
+ if (!rcu_is_watching())
+ return 0;
+ if (!rcu_lockdep_current_cpu_online())
+ return 0;
+ if (debug_locks)
+ lockdep_opinion = lock_is_held(&rcu_sched_lock_map);
+ return lockdep_opinion || preempt_count() != 0 || irqs_disabled();
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(rcu_read_lock_sched_held);
+#endif
+
#ifndef CONFIG_TINY_RCU
static atomic_t rcu_expedited_nesting =
@@ -269,20 +318,37 @@
rcu = container_of(head, struct rcu_synchronize, head);
complete(&rcu->completion);
}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(wakeme_after_rcu);
-void wait_rcu_gp(call_rcu_func_t crf)
+void __wait_rcu_gp(bool checktiny, int n, call_rcu_func_t *crcu_array,
+ struct rcu_synchronize *rs_array)
{
- struct rcu_synchronize rcu;
+ int i;
- init_rcu_head_on_stack(&rcu.head);
- init_completion(&rcu.completion);
- /* Will wake me after RCU finished. */
- crf(&rcu.head, wakeme_after_rcu);
- /* Wait for it. */
- wait_for_completion(&rcu.completion);
- destroy_rcu_head_on_stack(&rcu.head);
+ /* Initialize and register callbacks for each flavor specified. */
+ for (i = 0; i < n; i++) {
+ if (checktiny &&
+ (crcu_array[i] == call_rcu ||
+ crcu_array[i] == call_rcu_bh)) {
+ might_sleep();
+ continue;
+ }
+ init_rcu_head_on_stack(&rs_array[i].head);
+ init_completion(&rs_array[i].completion);
+ (crcu_array[i])(&rs_array[i].head, wakeme_after_rcu);
+ }
+
+ /* Wait for all callbacks to be invoked. */
+ for (i = 0; i < n; i++) {
+ if (checktiny &&
+ (crcu_array[i] == call_rcu ||
+ crcu_array[i] == call_rcu_bh))
+ continue;
+ wait_for_completion(&rs_array[i].completion);
+ destroy_rcu_head_on_stack(&rs_array[i].head);
+ }
}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(wait_rcu_gp);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__wait_rcu_gp);
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_OBJECTS_RCU_HEAD
void init_rcu_head(struct rcu_head *head)
@@ -523,8 +589,8 @@
void synchronize_rcu_tasks(void)
{
/* Complain if the scheduler has not started. */
- rcu_lockdep_assert(!rcu_scheduler_active,
- "synchronize_rcu_tasks called too soon");
+ RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(!rcu_scheduler_active,
+ "synchronize_rcu_tasks called too soon");
/* Wait for the grace period. */
wait_rcu_gp(call_rcu_tasks);
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 78b4bad10..5e73c79 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -2200,8 +2200,8 @@
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
inline struct dl_bw *dl_bw_of(int i)
{
- rcu_lockdep_assert(rcu_read_lock_sched_held(),
- "sched RCU must be held");
+ RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(!rcu_read_lock_sched_held(),
+ "sched RCU must be held");
return &cpu_rq(i)->rd->dl_bw;
}
@@ -2210,8 +2210,8 @@
struct root_domain *rd = cpu_rq(i)->rd;
int cpus = 0;
- rcu_lockdep_assert(rcu_read_lock_sched_held(),
- "sched RCU must be held");
+ RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(!rcu_read_lock_sched_held(),
+ "sched RCU must be held");
for_each_cpu_and(i, rd->span, cpu_active_mask)
cpus++;
diff --git a/kernel/time/Kconfig b/kernel/time/Kconfig
index 579ce1b..4008d9f 100644
--- a/kernel/time/Kconfig
+++ b/kernel/time/Kconfig
@@ -92,12 +92,10 @@
depends on !ARCH_USES_GETTIMEOFFSET && GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS
# We need at least one periodic CPU for timekeeping
depends on SMP
- # RCU_USER_QS dependency
depends on HAVE_CONTEXT_TRACKING
# VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING_GEN dependency
depends on HAVE_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING_GEN
select NO_HZ_COMMON
- select RCU_USER_QS
select RCU_NOCB_CPU
select VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING_GEN
select IRQ_WORK
diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index 4c4f061..cb91c63 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -338,20 +338,20 @@
#include <trace/events/workqueue.h>
#define assert_rcu_or_pool_mutex() \
- rcu_lockdep_assert(rcu_read_lock_sched_held() || \
- lockdep_is_held(&wq_pool_mutex), \
- "sched RCU or wq_pool_mutex should be held")
+ RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(!rcu_read_lock_sched_held() && \
+ !lockdep_is_held(&wq_pool_mutex), \
+ "sched RCU or wq_pool_mutex should be held")
#define assert_rcu_or_wq_mutex(wq) \
- rcu_lockdep_assert(rcu_read_lock_sched_held() || \
- lockdep_is_held(&wq->mutex), \
- "sched RCU or wq->mutex should be held")
+ RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(!rcu_read_lock_sched_held() && \
+ !lockdep_is_held(&wq->mutex), \
+ "sched RCU or wq->mutex should be held")
#define assert_rcu_or_wq_mutex_or_pool_mutex(wq) \
- rcu_lockdep_assert(rcu_read_lock_sched_held() || \
- lockdep_is_held(&wq->mutex) || \
- lockdep_is_held(&wq_pool_mutex), \
- "sched RCU, wq->mutex or wq_pool_mutex should be held")
+ RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(!rcu_read_lock_sched_held() && \
+ !lockdep_is_held(&wq->mutex) && \
+ !lockdep_is_held(&wq_pool_mutex), \
+ "sched RCU, wq->mutex or wq_pool_mutex should be held")
#define for_each_cpu_worker_pool(pool, cpu) \
for ((pool) = &per_cpu(cpu_worker_pools, cpu)[0]; \
diff --git a/lib/Kconfig.debug b/lib/Kconfig.debug
index e2894b2..3e0b662 100644
--- a/lib/Kconfig.debug
+++ b/lib/Kconfig.debug
@@ -1353,20 +1353,6 @@
RCU grace period persists, additional CPU stall warnings are
printed at more widely spaced intervals.
-config RCU_CPU_STALL_INFO
- bool "Print additional diagnostics on RCU CPU stall"
- depends on (TREE_RCU || PREEMPT_RCU) && DEBUG_KERNEL
- default y
- help
- For each stalled CPU that is aware of the current RCU grace
- period, print out additional per-CPU diagnostic information
- regarding scheduling-clock ticks, idle state, and,
- for RCU_FAST_NO_HZ kernels, idle-entry state.
-
- Say N if you are unsure.
-
- Say Y if you want to enable such diagnostics.
-
config RCU_TRACE
bool "Enable tracing for RCU"
depends on DEBUG_KERNEL
@@ -1379,7 +1365,7 @@
Say N if you are unsure.
config RCU_EQS_DEBUG
- bool "Use this when adding any sort of NO_HZ support to your arch"
+ bool "Provide debugging asserts for adding NO_HZ support to an arch"
depends on DEBUG_KERNEL
help
This option provides consistency checks in RCU's handling of
diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
index 90e1edc..976e711 100755
--- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
+++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
@@ -5011,6 +5011,7 @@
"memory barrier without comment\n" . $herecurr);
}
}
+
# check for waitqueue_active without a comment.
if ($line =~ /\bwaitqueue_active\s*\(/) {
if (!ctx_has_comment($first_line, $linenr)) {
@@ -5018,6 +5019,24 @@
"waitqueue_active without comment\n" . $herecurr);
}
}
+
+# Check for expedited grace periods that interrupt non-idle non-nohz
+# online CPUs. These expedited can therefore degrade real-time response
+# if used carelessly, and should be avoided where not absolutely
+# needed. It is always OK to use synchronize_rcu_expedited() and
+# synchronize_sched_expedited() at boot time (before real-time applications
+# start) and in error situations where real-time response is compromised in
+# any case. Note that synchronize_srcu_expedited() does -not- interrupt
+# other CPUs, so don't warn on uses of synchronize_srcu_expedited().
+# Of course, nothing comes for free, and srcu_read_lock() and
+# srcu_read_unlock() do contain full memory barriers in payment for
+# synchronize_srcu_expedited() non-interruption properties.
+ if ($line =~ /\b(synchronize_rcu_expedited|synchronize_sched_expedited)\(/) {
+ WARN("EXPEDITED_RCU_GRACE_PERIOD",
+ "expedited RCU grace periods should be avoided where they can degrade real-time response\n" . $herecurr);
+
+ }
+
# check of hardware specific defines
if ($line =~ m@^.\s*\#\s*if.*\b(__i386__|__powerpc64__|__sun__|__s390x__)\b@ && $realfile !~ m@include/asm-@) {
CHK("ARCH_DEFINES",
diff --git a/security/device_cgroup.c b/security/device_cgroup.c
index 188c1d2..73455089 100644
--- a/security/device_cgroup.c
+++ b/security/device_cgroup.c
@@ -400,9 +400,9 @@
{
bool match = false;
- rcu_lockdep_assert(rcu_read_lock_held() ||
- lockdep_is_held(&devcgroup_mutex),
- "device_cgroup:verify_new_ex called without proper synchronization");
+ RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(!rcu_read_lock_held() &&
+ lockdep_is_held(&devcgroup_mutex),
+ "device_cgroup:verify_new_ex called without proper synchronization");
if (dev_cgroup->behavior == DEVCG_DEFAULT_ALLOW) {
if (behavior == DEVCG_DEFAULT_ALLOW) {
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/configs/rcu/TREE01 b/tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/configs/rcu/TREE01
index 8e9137f..f572b87 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/configs/rcu/TREE01
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/configs/rcu/TREE01
@@ -13,7 +13,6 @@
CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU=y
CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU_ZERO=y
CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC=n
-CONFIG_RCU_CPU_STALL_INFO=n
CONFIG_RCU_BOOST=n
CONFIG_DEBUG_OBJECTS_RCU_HEAD=n
CONFIG_RCU_EXPERT=y
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/configs/rcu/TREE02 b/tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/configs/rcu/TREE02
index aeea6a2..ef6a22c 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/configs/rcu/TREE02
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/configs/rcu/TREE02
@@ -17,7 +17,6 @@
CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU=n
CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC=y
CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING=n
-CONFIG_RCU_CPU_STALL_INFO=n
CONFIG_RCU_BOOST=n
CONFIG_DEBUG_OBJECTS_RCU_HEAD=n
CONFIG_RCU_EXPERT=y
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/configs/rcu/TREE02-T b/tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/configs/rcu/TREE02-T
index 2ac9e68..917d251 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/configs/rcu/TREE02-T
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/configs/rcu/TREE02-T
@@ -17,6 +17,5 @@
CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU=n
CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC=y
CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING=n
-CONFIG_RCU_CPU_STALL_INFO=n
CONFIG_RCU_BOOST=n
CONFIG_DEBUG_OBJECTS_RCU_HEAD=n
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/configs/rcu/TREE03 b/tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/configs/rcu/TREE03
index 72aa7d8..7a17c50 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/configs/rcu/TREE03
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/configs/rcu/TREE03
@@ -13,7 +13,6 @@
CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT_LEAF=2
CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU=n
CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC=n
-CONFIG_RCU_CPU_STALL_INFO=n
CONFIG_RCU_BOOST=y
CONFIG_RCU_KTHREAD_PRIO=2
CONFIG_DEBUG_OBJECTS_RCU_HEAD=n
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/configs/rcu/TREE04 b/tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/configs/rcu/TREE04
index 3f51127..39a2c6d 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/configs/rcu/TREE04
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/configs/rcu/TREE04
@@ -17,6 +17,5 @@
CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT_LEAF=4
CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU=n
CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC=n
-CONFIG_RCU_CPU_STALL_INFO=n
CONFIG_DEBUG_OBJECTS_RCU_HEAD=n
CONFIG_RCU_EXPERT=y
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/configs/rcu/TREE05 b/tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/configs/rcu/TREE05
index c04dfea..1257d32 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/configs/rcu/TREE05
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/configs/rcu/TREE05
@@ -17,6 +17,5 @@
CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC=y
CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING=y
#CHECK#CONFIG_PROVE_RCU=y
-CONFIG_RCU_CPU_STALL_INFO=n
CONFIG_DEBUG_OBJECTS_RCU_HEAD=n
CONFIG_RCU_EXPERT=y
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/configs/rcu/TREE06 b/tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/configs/rcu/TREE06
index f51d2c7..d3e456b 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/configs/rcu/TREE06
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/configs/rcu/TREE06
@@ -18,6 +18,5 @@
CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC=y
CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING=y
#CHECK#CONFIG_PROVE_RCU=y
-CONFIG_RCU_CPU_STALL_INFO=n
CONFIG_DEBUG_OBJECTS_RCU_HEAD=y
CONFIG_RCU_EXPERT=y
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/configs/rcu/TREE07 b/tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/configs/rcu/TREE07
index f422af4..3956b41 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/configs/rcu/TREE07
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/configs/rcu/TREE07
@@ -17,6 +17,5 @@
CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT_LEAF=2
CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU=n
CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC=n
-CONFIG_RCU_CPU_STALL_INFO=n
CONFIG_DEBUG_OBJECTS_RCU_HEAD=n
CONFIG_RCU_EXPERT=y
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/configs/rcu/TREE08 b/tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/configs/rcu/TREE08
index a24d2ca..bb9b0c1 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/configs/rcu/TREE08
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/configs/rcu/TREE08
@@ -19,7 +19,6 @@
CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC=n
CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING=y
#CHECK#CONFIG_PROVE_RCU=y
-CONFIG_RCU_CPU_STALL_INFO=n
CONFIG_RCU_BOOST=n
CONFIG_DEBUG_OBJECTS_RCU_HEAD=n
CONFIG_RCU_EXPERT=y
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/configs/rcu/TREE08-T b/tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/configs/rcu/TREE08-T
index b2b8cea..2ad13f0 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/configs/rcu/TREE08-T
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/configs/rcu/TREE08-T
@@ -17,6 +17,5 @@
CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU=y
CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU_ALL=y
CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC=n
-CONFIG_RCU_CPU_STALL_INFO=n
CONFIG_RCU_BOOST=n
CONFIG_DEBUG_OBJECTS_RCU_HEAD=n
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/configs/rcu/TREE09 b/tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/configs/rcu/TREE09
index aa4ed08..6710e74 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/configs/rcu/TREE09
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/configs/rcu/TREE09
@@ -13,7 +13,6 @@
CONFIG_HIBERNATION=n
CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU=n
CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC=n
-CONFIG_RCU_CPU_STALL_INFO=n
CONFIG_RCU_BOOST=n
CONFIG_DEBUG_OBJECTS_RCU_HEAD=n
#CHECK#CONFIG_RCU_EXPERT=n
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/doc/TREE_RCU-kconfig.txt b/tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/doc/TREE_RCU-kconfig.txt
index b24c000..657f3a0 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/doc/TREE_RCU-kconfig.txt
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/doc/TREE_RCU-kconfig.txt
@@ -16,7 +16,6 @@
CONFIG_PROVE_RCU -- Hardwired to CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING.
CONFIG_RCU_BOOST -- one of PREEMPT_RCU.
CONFIG_RCU_KTHREAD_PRIO -- set to 2 for _BOOST testing.
-CONFIG_RCU_CPU_STALL_INFO -- Now default, avoid at least twice.
CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT -- Cover hierarchy, but overlap with others.
CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT_LEAF -- Do one non-default.
CONFIG_RCU_FAST_NO_HZ -- Do one, but not with CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU_ALL.