| Memory Resource Controller |
| |
| NOTE: The Memory Resource Controller has been generically been referred |
| to as the memory controller in this document. Do not confuse memory controller |
| used here with the memory controller that is used in hardware. |
| |
| Salient features |
| |
| a. Enable control of both RSS (mapped) and Page Cache (unmapped) pages |
| b. The infrastructure allows easy addition of other types of memory to control |
| c. Provides *zero overhead* for non memory controller users |
| d. Provides a double LRU: global memory pressure causes reclaim from the |
| global LRU; a cgroup on hitting a limit, reclaims from the per |
| cgroup LRU |
| |
| NOTE: Swap Cache (unmapped) is not accounted now. |
| |
| Benefits and Purpose of the memory controller |
| |
| The memory controller isolates the memory behaviour of a group of tasks |
| from the rest of the system. The article on LWN [12] mentions some probable |
| uses of the memory controller. The memory controller can be used to |
| |
| a. Isolate an application or a group of applications |
| Memory hungry applications can be isolated and limited to a smaller |
| amount of memory. |
| b. Create a cgroup with limited amount of memory, this can be used |
| as a good alternative to booting with mem=XXXX. |
| c. Virtualization solutions can control the amount of memory they want |
| to assign to a virtual machine instance. |
| d. A CD/DVD burner could control the amount of memory used by the |
| rest of the system to ensure that burning does not fail due to lack |
| of available memory. |
| e. There are several other use cases, find one or use the controller just |
| for fun (to learn and hack on the VM subsystem). |
| |
| 1. History |
| |
| The memory controller has a long history. A request for comments for the memory |
| controller was posted by Balbir Singh [1]. At the time the RFC was posted |
| there were several implementations for memory control. The goal of the |
| RFC was to build consensus and agreement for the minimal features required |
| for memory control. The first RSS controller was posted by Balbir Singh[2] |
| in Feb 2007. Pavel Emelianov [3][4][5] has since posted three versions of the |
| RSS controller. At OLS, at the resource management BoF, everyone suggested |
| that we handle both page cache and RSS together. Another request was raised |
| to allow user space handling of OOM. The current memory controller is |
| at version 6; it combines both mapped (RSS) and unmapped Page |
| Cache Control [11]. |
| |
| 2. Memory Control |
| |
| Memory is a unique resource in the sense that it is present in a limited |
| amount. If a task requires a lot of CPU processing, the task can spread |
| its processing over a period of hours, days, months or years, but with |
| memory, the same physical memory needs to be reused to accomplish the task. |
| |
| The memory controller implementation has been divided into phases. These |
| are: |
| |
| 1. Memory controller |
| 2. mlock(2) controller |
| 3. Kernel user memory accounting and slab control |
| 4. user mappings length controller |
| |
| The memory controller is the first controller developed. |
| |
| 2.1. Design |
| |
| The core of the design is a counter called the res_counter. The res_counter |
| tracks the current memory usage and limit of the group of processes associated |
| with the controller. Each cgroup has a memory controller specific data |
| structure (mem_cgroup) associated with it. |
| |
| 2.2. Accounting |
| |
| +--------------------+ |
| | mem_cgroup | |
| | (res_counter) | |
| +--------------------+ |
| / ^ \ |
| / | \ |
| +---------------+ | +---------------+ |
| | mm_struct | |.... | mm_struct | |
| | | | | | |
| +---------------+ | +---------------+ |
| | |
| + --------------+ |
| | |
| +---------------+ +------+--------+ |
| | page +----------> page_cgroup| |
| | | | | |
| +---------------+ +---------------+ |
| |
| (Figure 1: Hierarchy of Accounting) |
| |
| |
| Figure 1 shows the important aspects of the controller |
| |
| 1. Accounting happens per cgroup |
| 2. Each mm_struct knows about which cgroup it belongs to |
| 3. Each page has a pointer to the page_cgroup, which in turn knows the |
| cgroup it belongs to |
| |
| The accounting is done as follows: mem_cgroup_charge() is invoked to setup |
| the necessary data structures and check if the cgroup that is being charged |
| is over its limit. If it is then reclaim is invoked on the cgroup. |
| More details can be found in the reclaim section of this document. |
| If everything goes well, a page meta-data-structure called page_cgroup is |
| allocated and associated with the page. This routine also adds the page to |
| the per cgroup LRU. |
| |
| 2.2.1 Accounting details |
| |
| All mapped pages (RSS) and unmapped user pages (Page Cache) are accounted. |
| RSS pages are accounted at the time of page_add_*_rmap() unless they've already |
| been accounted for earlier. A file page will be accounted for as Page Cache; |
| it's mapped into the page tables of a process, duplicate accounting is carefully |
| avoided. Page Cache pages are accounted at the time of add_to_page_cache(). |
| The corresponding routines that remove a page from the page tables or removes |
| a page from Page Cache is used to decrement the accounting counters of the |
| cgroup. |
| |
| 2.3 Shared Page Accounting |
| |
| Shared pages are accounted on the basis of the first touch approach. The |
| cgroup that first touches a page is accounted for the page. The principle |
| behind this approach is that a cgroup that aggressively uses a shared |
| page will eventually get charged for it (once it is uncharged from |
| the cgroup that brought it in -- this will happen on memory pressure). |
| |
| 2.4 Reclaim |
| |
| Each cgroup maintains a per cgroup LRU that consists of an active |
| and inactive list. When a cgroup goes over its limit, we first try |
| to reclaim memory from the cgroup so as to make space for the new |
| pages that the cgroup has touched. If the reclaim is unsuccessful, |
| an OOM routine is invoked to select and kill the bulkiest task in the |
| cgroup. |
| |
| The reclaim algorithm has not been modified for cgroups, except that |
| pages that are selected for reclaiming come from the per cgroup LRU |
| list. |
| |
| 2. Locking |
| |
| The memory controller uses the following hierarchy |
| |
| 1. zone->lru_lock is used for selecting pages to be isolated |
| 2. mem->per_zone->lru_lock protects the per cgroup LRU (per zone) |
| 3. lock_page_cgroup() is used to protect page->page_cgroup |
| |
| 3. User Interface |
| |
| 0. Configuration |
| |
| a. Enable CONFIG_CGROUPS |
| b. Enable CONFIG_RESOURCE_COUNTERS |
| c. Enable CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR |
| |
| 1. Prepare the cgroups |
| # mkdir -p /cgroups |
| # mount -t cgroup none /cgroups -o memory |
| |
| 2. Make the new group and move bash into it |
| # mkdir /cgroups/0 |
| # echo $$ > /cgroups/0/tasks |
| |
| Since now we're in the 0 cgroup, |
| We can alter the memory limit: |
| # echo 4M > /cgroups/0/memory.limit_in_bytes |
| |
| NOTE: We can use a suffix (k, K, m, M, g or G) to indicate values in kilo, |
| mega or gigabytes. |
| |
| # cat /cgroups/0/memory.limit_in_bytes |
| 4194304 |
| |
| NOTE: The interface has now changed to display the usage in bytes |
| instead of pages |
| |
| We can check the usage: |
| # cat /cgroups/0/memory.usage_in_bytes |
| 1216512 |
| |
| A successful write to this file does not guarantee a successful set of |
| this limit to the value written into the file. This can be due to a |
| number of factors, such as rounding up to page boundaries or the total |
| availability of memory on the system. The user is required to re-read |
| this file after a write to guarantee the value committed by the kernel. |
| |
| # echo 1 > memory.limit_in_bytes |
| # cat memory.limit_in_bytes |
| 4096 |
| |
| The memory.failcnt field gives the number of times that the cgroup limit was |
| exceeded. |
| |
| The memory.stat file gives accounting information. Now, the number of |
| caches, RSS and Active pages/Inactive pages are shown. |
| |
| The memory.force_empty gives an interface to drop *all* charges by force. |
| |
| # echo 1 > memory.force_empty |
| |
| will drop all charges in cgroup. Currently, this is maintained for test. |
| |
| 4. Testing |
| |
| Balbir posted lmbench, AIM9, LTP and vmmstress results [10] and [11]. |
| Apart from that v6 has been tested with several applications and regular |
| daily use. The controller has also been tested on the PPC64, x86_64 and |
| UML platforms. |
| |
| 4.1 Troubleshooting |
| |
| Sometimes a user might find that the application under a cgroup is |
| terminated. There are several causes for this: |
| |
| 1. The cgroup limit is too low (just too low to do anything useful) |
| 2. The user is using anonymous memory and swap is turned off or too low |
| |
| A sync followed by echo 1 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches will help get rid of |
| some of the pages cached in the cgroup (page cache pages). |
| |
| 4.2 Task migration |
| |
| When a task migrates from one cgroup to another, it's charge is not |
| carried forward. The pages allocated from the original cgroup still |
| remain charged to it, the charge is dropped when the page is freed or |
| reclaimed. |
| |
| 4.3 Removing a cgroup |
| |
| A cgroup can be removed by rmdir, but as discussed in sections 4.1 and 4.2, a |
| cgroup might have some charge associated with it, even though all |
| tasks have migrated away from it. Such charges are automatically dropped at |
| rmdir() if there are no tasks. |
| |
| 5. TODO |
| |
| 1. Add support for accounting huge pages (as a separate controller) |
| 2. Make per-cgroup scanner reclaim not-shared pages first |
| 3. Teach controller to account for shared-pages |
| 4. Start reclamation when the limit is lowered |
| 5. Start reclamation in the background when the limit is |
| not yet hit but the usage is getting closer |
| |
| Summary |
| |
| Overall, the memory controller has been a stable controller and has been |
| commented and discussed quite extensively in the community. |
| |
| References |
| |
| 1. Singh, Balbir. RFC: Memory Controller, http://lwn.net/Articles/206697/ |
| 2. Singh, Balbir. Memory Controller (RSS Control), |
| http://lwn.net/Articles/222762/ |
| 3. Emelianov, Pavel. Resource controllers based on process cgroups |
| http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/6/198 |
| 4. Emelianov, Pavel. RSS controller based on process cgroups (v2) |
| http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/4/9/78 |
| 5. Emelianov, Pavel. RSS controller based on process cgroups (v3) |
| http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/5/30/244 |
| 6. Menage, Paul. Control Groups v10, http://lwn.net/Articles/236032/ |
| 7. Vaidyanathan, Srinivasan, Control Groups: Pagecache accounting and control |
| subsystem (v3), http://lwn.net/Articles/235534/ |
| 8. Singh, Balbir. RSS controller v2 test results (lmbench), |
| http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/5/17/232 |
| 9. Singh, Balbir. RSS controller v2 AIM9 results |
| http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/5/18/1 |
| 10. Singh, Balbir. Memory controller v6 test results, |
| http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/8/19/36 |
| 11. Singh, Balbir. Memory controller introduction (v6), |
| http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/8/17/69 |
| 12. Corbet, Jonathan, Controlling memory use in cgroups, |
| http://lwn.net/Articles/243795/ |