blob: 7919f8ece6bac8c89cd255b367fa8dfcb722fca5 [file] [log] [blame]
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07001/*
2 * linux/ipc/sem.c
3 * Copyright (C) 1992 Krishna Balasubramanian
4 * Copyright (C) 1995 Eric Schenk, Bruno Haible
5 *
6 * IMPLEMENTATION NOTES ON CODE REWRITE (Eric Schenk, January 1995):
7 * This code underwent a massive rewrite in order to solve some problems
8 * with the original code. In particular the original code failed to
9 * wake up processes that were waiting for semval to go to 0 if the
10 * value went to 0 and was then incremented rapidly enough. In solving
11 * this problem I have also modified the implementation so that it
12 * processes pending operations in a FIFO manner, thus give a guarantee
13 * that processes waiting for a lock on the semaphore won't starve
14 * unless another locking process fails to unlock.
15 * In addition the following two changes in behavior have been introduced:
16 * - The original implementation of semop returned the value
17 * last semaphore element examined on success. This does not
18 * match the manual page specifications, and effectively
19 * allows the user to read the semaphore even if they do not
20 * have read permissions. The implementation now returns 0
21 * on success as stated in the manual page.
22 * - There is some confusion over whether the set of undo adjustments
23 * to be performed at exit should be done in an atomic manner.
24 * That is, if we are attempting to decrement the semval should we queue
25 * up and wait until we can do so legally?
26 * The original implementation attempted to do this.
27 * The current implementation does not do so. This is because I don't
28 * think it is the right thing (TM) to do, and because I couldn't
29 * see a clean way to get the old behavior with the new design.
30 * The POSIX standard and SVID should be consulted to determine
31 * what behavior is mandated.
32 *
33 * Further notes on refinement (Christoph Rohland, December 1998):
34 * - The POSIX standard says, that the undo adjustments simply should
35 * redo. So the current implementation is o.K.
36 * - The previous code had two flaws:
37 * 1) It actively gave the semaphore to the next waiting process
38 * sleeping on the semaphore. Since this process did not have the
39 * cpu this led to many unnecessary context switches and bad
40 * performance. Now we only check which process should be able to
41 * get the semaphore and if this process wants to reduce some
42 * semaphore value we simply wake it up without doing the
43 * operation. So it has to try to get it later. Thus e.g. the
44 * running process may reacquire the semaphore during the current
45 * time slice. If it only waits for zero or increases the semaphore,
46 * we do the operation in advance and wake it up.
47 * 2) It did not wake up all zero waiting processes. We try to do
48 * better but only get the semops right which only wait for zero or
49 * increase. If there are decrement operations in the operations
50 * array we do the same as before.
51 *
52 * With the incarnation of O(1) scheduler, it becomes unnecessary to perform
53 * check/retry algorithm for waking up blocked processes as the new scheduler
54 * is better at handling thread switch than the old one.
55 *
56 * /proc/sysvipc/sem support (c) 1999 Dragos Acostachioaie <dragos@iname.com>
57 *
58 * SMP-threaded, sysctl's added
Christian Kujau624dffc2006-01-15 02:43:54 +010059 * (c) 1999 Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com>
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -070060 * Enforced range limit on SEM_UNDO
61 * (c) 2001 Red Hat Inc <alan@redhat.com>
62 * Lockless wakeup
63 * (c) 2003 Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com>
Steve Grubb073115d2006-04-02 17:07:33 -040064 *
65 * support for audit of ipc object properties and permission changes
66 * Dustin Kirkland <dustin.kirkland@us.ibm.com>
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -070067 */
68
69#include <linux/config.h>
70#include <linux/slab.h>
71#include <linux/spinlock.h>
72#include <linux/init.h>
73#include <linux/proc_fs.h>
74#include <linux/time.h>
75#include <linux/smp_lock.h>
76#include <linux/security.h>
77#include <linux/syscalls.h>
78#include <linux/audit.h>
Randy.Dunlapc59ede72006-01-11 12:17:46 -080079#include <linux/capability.h>
Mike Waychison19b49462005-09-06 15:17:10 -070080#include <linux/seq_file.h>
Ingo Molnar5f921ae2006-03-26 01:37:17 -080081#include <linux/mutex.h>
82
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -070083#include <asm/uaccess.h>
84#include "util.h"
85
86
87#define sem_lock(id) ((struct sem_array*)ipc_lock(&sem_ids,id))
88#define sem_unlock(sma) ipc_unlock(&(sma)->sem_perm)
89#define sem_rmid(id) ((struct sem_array*)ipc_rmid(&sem_ids,id))
90#define sem_checkid(sma, semid) \
91 ipc_checkid(&sem_ids,&sma->sem_perm,semid)
92#define sem_buildid(id, seq) \
93 ipc_buildid(&sem_ids, id, seq)
94static struct ipc_ids sem_ids;
95
96static int newary (key_t, int, int);
97static void freeary (struct sem_array *sma, int id);
98#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
Mike Waychison19b49462005-09-06 15:17:10 -070099static int sysvipc_sem_proc_show(struct seq_file *s, void *it);
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700100#endif
101
102#define SEMMSL_FAST 256 /* 512 bytes on stack */
103#define SEMOPM_FAST 64 /* ~ 372 bytes on stack */
104
105/*
106 * linked list protection:
107 * sem_undo.id_next,
108 * sem_array.sem_pending{,last},
109 * sem_array.sem_undo: sem_lock() for read/write
110 * sem_undo.proc_next: only "current" is allowed to read/write that field.
111 *
112 */
113
114int sem_ctls[4] = {SEMMSL, SEMMNS, SEMOPM, SEMMNI};
115#define sc_semmsl (sem_ctls[0])
116#define sc_semmns (sem_ctls[1])
117#define sc_semopm (sem_ctls[2])
118#define sc_semmni (sem_ctls[3])
119
120static int used_sems;
121
122void __init sem_init (void)
123{
124 used_sems = 0;
125 ipc_init_ids(&sem_ids,sc_semmni);
Mike Waychison19b49462005-09-06 15:17:10 -0700126 ipc_init_proc_interface("sysvipc/sem",
127 " key semid perms nsems uid gid cuid cgid otime ctime\n",
128 &sem_ids,
129 sysvipc_sem_proc_show);
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700130}
131
132/*
133 * Lockless wakeup algorithm:
134 * Without the check/retry algorithm a lockless wakeup is possible:
135 * - queue.status is initialized to -EINTR before blocking.
136 * - wakeup is performed by
137 * * unlinking the queue entry from sma->sem_pending
138 * * setting queue.status to IN_WAKEUP
139 * This is the notification for the blocked thread that a
140 * result value is imminent.
141 * * call wake_up_process
142 * * set queue.status to the final value.
143 * - the previously blocked thread checks queue.status:
144 * * if it's IN_WAKEUP, then it must wait until the value changes
145 * * if it's not -EINTR, then the operation was completed by
146 * update_queue. semtimedop can return queue.status without
Ingo Molnar5f921ae2006-03-26 01:37:17 -0800147 * performing any operation on the sem array.
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700148 * * otherwise it must acquire the spinlock and check what's up.
149 *
150 * The two-stage algorithm is necessary to protect against the following
151 * races:
152 * - if queue.status is set after wake_up_process, then the woken up idle
153 * thread could race forward and try (and fail) to acquire sma->lock
154 * before update_queue had a chance to set queue.status
155 * - if queue.status is written before wake_up_process and if the
156 * blocked process is woken up by a signal between writing
157 * queue.status and the wake_up_process, then the woken up
158 * process could return from semtimedop and die by calling
159 * sys_exit before wake_up_process is called. Then wake_up_process
160 * will oops, because the task structure is already invalid.
161 * (yes, this happened on s390 with sysv msg).
162 *
163 */
164#define IN_WAKEUP 1
165
166static int newary (key_t key, int nsems, int semflg)
167{
168 int id;
169 int retval;
170 struct sem_array *sma;
171 int size;
172
173 if (!nsems)
174 return -EINVAL;
175 if (used_sems + nsems > sc_semmns)
176 return -ENOSPC;
177
178 size = sizeof (*sma) + nsems * sizeof (struct sem);
179 sma = ipc_rcu_alloc(size);
180 if (!sma) {
181 return -ENOMEM;
182 }
183 memset (sma, 0, size);
184
185 sma->sem_perm.mode = (semflg & S_IRWXUGO);
186 sma->sem_perm.key = key;
187
188 sma->sem_perm.security = NULL;
189 retval = security_sem_alloc(sma);
190 if (retval) {
191 ipc_rcu_putref(sma);
192 return retval;
193 }
194
195 id = ipc_addid(&sem_ids, &sma->sem_perm, sc_semmni);
196 if(id == -1) {
197 security_sem_free(sma);
198 ipc_rcu_putref(sma);
199 return -ENOSPC;
200 }
201 used_sems += nsems;
202
Mike Waychison19b49462005-09-06 15:17:10 -0700203 sma->sem_id = sem_buildid(id, sma->sem_perm.seq);
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700204 sma->sem_base = (struct sem *) &sma[1];
205 /* sma->sem_pending = NULL; */
206 sma->sem_pending_last = &sma->sem_pending;
207 /* sma->undo = NULL; */
208 sma->sem_nsems = nsems;
209 sma->sem_ctime = get_seconds();
210 sem_unlock(sma);
211
Mike Waychison19b49462005-09-06 15:17:10 -0700212 return sma->sem_id;
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700213}
214
215asmlinkage long sys_semget (key_t key, int nsems, int semflg)
216{
217 int id, err = -EINVAL;
218 struct sem_array *sma;
219
220 if (nsems < 0 || nsems > sc_semmsl)
221 return -EINVAL;
Ingo Molnar5f921ae2006-03-26 01:37:17 -0800222 mutex_lock(&sem_ids.mutex);
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700223
224 if (key == IPC_PRIVATE) {
225 err = newary(key, nsems, semflg);
226 } else if ((id = ipc_findkey(&sem_ids, key)) == -1) { /* key not used */
227 if (!(semflg & IPC_CREAT))
228 err = -ENOENT;
229 else
230 err = newary(key, nsems, semflg);
231 } else if (semflg & IPC_CREAT && semflg & IPC_EXCL) {
232 err = -EEXIST;
233 } else {
234 sma = sem_lock(id);
Eric Sesterhenn27315c92006-03-26 18:28:38 +0200235 BUG_ON(sma==NULL);
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700236 if (nsems > sma->sem_nsems)
237 err = -EINVAL;
238 else if (ipcperms(&sma->sem_perm, semflg))
239 err = -EACCES;
240 else {
241 int semid = sem_buildid(id, sma->sem_perm.seq);
242 err = security_sem_associate(sma, semflg);
243 if (!err)
244 err = semid;
245 }
246 sem_unlock(sma);
247 }
248
Ingo Molnar5f921ae2006-03-26 01:37:17 -0800249 mutex_unlock(&sem_ids.mutex);
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700250 return err;
251}
252
253/* Manage the doubly linked list sma->sem_pending as a FIFO:
254 * insert new queue elements at the tail sma->sem_pending_last.
255 */
256static inline void append_to_queue (struct sem_array * sma,
257 struct sem_queue * q)
258{
259 *(q->prev = sma->sem_pending_last) = q;
260 *(sma->sem_pending_last = &q->next) = NULL;
261}
262
263static inline void prepend_to_queue (struct sem_array * sma,
264 struct sem_queue * q)
265{
266 q->next = sma->sem_pending;
267 *(q->prev = &sma->sem_pending) = q;
268 if (q->next)
269 q->next->prev = &q->next;
270 else /* sma->sem_pending_last == &sma->sem_pending */
271 sma->sem_pending_last = &q->next;
272}
273
274static inline void remove_from_queue (struct sem_array * sma,
275 struct sem_queue * q)
276{
277 *(q->prev) = q->next;
278 if (q->next)
279 q->next->prev = q->prev;
280 else /* sma->sem_pending_last == &q->next */
281 sma->sem_pending_last = q->prev;
282 q->prev = NULL; /* mark as removed */
283}
284
285/*
286 * Determine whether a sequence of semaphore operations would succeed
287 * all at once. Return 0 if yes, 1 if need to sleep, else return error code.
288 */
289
290static int try_atomic_semop (struct sem_array * sma, struct sembuf * sops,
291 int nsops, struct sem_undo *un, int pid)
292{
293 int result, sem_op;
294 struct sembuf *sop;
295 struct sem * curr;
296
297 for (sop = sops; sop < sops + nsops; sop++) {
298 curr = sma->sem_base + sop->sem_num;
299 sem_op = sop->sem_op;
300 result = curr->semval;
301
302 if (!sem_op && result)
303 goto would_block;
304
305 result += sem_op;
306 if (result < 0)
307 goto would_block;
308 if (result > SEMVMX)
309 goto out_of_range;
310 if (sop->sem_flg & SEM_UNDO) {
311 int undo = un->semadj[sop->sem_num] - sem_op;
312 /*
313 * Exceeding the undo range is an error.
314 */
315 if (undo < (-SEMAEM - 1) || undo > SEMAEM)
316 goto out_of_range;
317 }
318 curr->semval = result;
319 }
320
321 sop--;
322 while (sop >= sops) {
323 sma->sem_base[sop->sem_num].sempid = pid;
324 if (sop->sem_flg & SEM_UNDO)
325 un->semadj[sop->sem_num] -= sop->sem_op;
326 sop--;
327 }
328
329 sma->sem_otime = get_seconds();
330 return 0;
331
332out_of_range:
333 result = -ERANGE;
334 goto undo;
335
336would_block:
337 if (sop->sem_flg & IPC_NOWAIT)
338 result = -EAGAIN;
339 else
340 result = 1;
341
342undo:
343 sop--;
344 while (sop >= sops) {
345 sma->sem_base[sop->sem_num].semval -= sop->sem_op;
346 sop--;
347 }
348
349 return result;
350}
351
352/* Go through the pending queue for the indicated semaphore
353 * looking for tasks that can be completed.
354 */
355static void update_queue (struct sem_array * sma)
356{
357 int error;
358 struct sem_queue * q;
359
360 q = sma->sem_pending;
361 while(q) {
362 error = try_atomic_semop(sma, q->sops, q->nsops,
363 q->undo, q->pid);
364
365 /* Does q->sleeper still need to sleep? */
366 if (error <= 0) {
367 struct sem_queue *n;
368 remove_from_queue(sma,q);
369 q->status = IN_WAKEUP;
370 /*
371 * Continue scanning. The next operation
372 * that must be checked depends on the type of the
373 * completed operation:
374 * - if the operation modified the array, then
375 * restart from the head of the queue and
376 * check for threads that might be waiting
377 * for semaphore values to become 0.
378 * - if the operation didn't modify the array,
379 * then just continue.
380 */
381 if (q->alter)
382 n = sma->sem_pending;
383 else
384 n = q->next;
385 wake_up_process(q->sleeper);
386 /* hands-off: q will disappear immediately after
387 * writing q->status.
388 */
Linus Torvalds1224b372005-12-24 12:19:38 -0800389 smp_wmb();
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700390 q->status = error;
391 q = n;
392 } else {
393 q = q->next;
394 }
395 }
396}
397
398/* The following counts are associated to each semaphore:
399 * semncnt number of tasks waiting on semval being nonzero
400 * semzcnt number of tasks waiting on semval being zero
401 * This model assumes that a task waits on exactly one semaphore.
402 * Since semaphore operations are to be performed atomically, tasks actually
403 * wait on a whole sequence of semaphores simultaneously.
404 * The counts we return here are a rough approximation, but still
405 * warrant that semncnt+semzcnt>0 if the task is on the pending queue.
406 */
407static int count_semncnt (struct sem_array * sma, ushort semnum)
408{
409 int semncnt;
410 struct sem_queue * q;
411
412 semncnt = 0;
413 for (q = sma->sem_pending; q; q = q->next) {
414 struct sembuf * sops = q->sops;
415 int nsops = q->nsops;
416 int i;
417 for (i = 0; i < nsops; i++)
418 if (sops[i].sem_num == semnum
419 && (sops[i].sem_op < 0)
420 && !(sops[i].sem_flg & IPC_NOWAIT))
421 semncnt++;
422 }
423 return semncnt;
424}
425static int count_semzcnt (struct sem_array * sma, ushort semnum)
426{
427 int semzcnt;
428 struct sem_queue * q;
429
430 semzcnt = 0;
431 for (q = sma->sem_pending; q; q = q->next) {
432 struct sembuf * sops = q->sops;
433 int nsops = q->nsops;
434 int i;
435 for (i = 0; i < nsops; i++)
436 if (sops[i].sem_num == semnum
437 && (sops[i].sem_op == 0)
438 && !(sops[i].sem_flg & IPC_NOWAIT))
439 semzcnt++;
440 }
441 return semzcnt;
442}
443
Ingo Molnar5f921ae2006-03-26 01:37:17 -0800444/* Free a semaphore set. freeary() is called with sem_ids.mutex locked and
445 * the spinlock for this semaphore set hold. sem_ids.mutex remains locked
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700446 * on exit.
447 */
448static void freeary (struct sem_array *sma, int id)
449{
450 struct sem_undo *un;
451 struct sem_queue *q;
452 int size;
453
454 /* Invalidate the existing undo structures for this semaphore set.
455 * (They will be freed without any further action in exit_sem()
456 * or during the next semop.)
457 */
458 for (un = sma->undo; un; un = un->id_next)
459 un->semid = -1;
460
461 /* Wake up all pending processes and let them fail with EIDRM. */
462 q = sma->sem_pending;
463 while(q) {
464 struct sem_queue *n;
465 /* lazy remove_from_queue: we are killing the whole queue */
466 q->prev = NULL;
467 n = q->next;
468 q->status = IN_WAKEUP;
469 wake_up_process(q->sleeper); /* doesn't sleep */
Manfred Spraul6003a932005-12-23 23:57:41 +0100470 smp_wmb();
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700471 q->status = -EIDRM; /* hands-off q */
472 q = n;
473 }
474
475 /* Remove the semaphore set from the ID array*/
476 sma = sem_rmid(id);
477 sem_unlock(sma);
478
479 used_sems -= sma->sem_nsems;
480 size = sizeof (*sma) + sma->sem_nsems * sizeof (struct sem);
481 security_sem_free(sma);
482 ipc_rcu_putref(sma);
483}
484
485static unsigned long copy_semid_to_user(void __user *buf, struct semid64_ds *in, int version)
486{
487 switch(version) {
488 case IPC_64:
489 return copy_to_user(buf, in, sizeof(*in));
490 case IPC_OLD:
491 {
492 struct semid_ds out;
493
494 ipc64_perm_to_ipc_perm(&in->sem_perm, &out.sem_perm);
495
496 out.sem_otime = in->sem_otime;
497 out.sem_ctime = in->sem_ctime;
498 out.sem_nsems = in->sem_nsems;
499
500 return copy_to_user(buf, &out, sizeof(out));
501 }
502 default:
503 return -EINVAL;
504 }
505}
506
507static int semctl_nolock(int semid, int semnum, int cmd, int version, union semun arg)
508{
509 int err = -EINVAL;
510 struct sem_array *sma;
511
512 switch(cmd) {
513 case IPC_INFO:
514 case SEM_INFO:
515 {
516 struct seminfo seminfo;
517 int max_id;
518
519 err = security_sem_semctl(NULL, cmd);
520 if (err)
521 return err;
522
523 memset(&seminfo,0,sizeof(seminfo));
524 seminfo.semmni = sc_semmni;
525 seminfo.semmns = sc_semmns;
526 seminfo.semmsl = sc_semmsl;
527 seminfo.semopm = sc_semopm;
528 seminfo.semvmx = SEMVMX;
529 seminfo.semmnu = SEMMNU;
530 seminfo.semmap = SEMMAP;
531 seminfo.semume = SEMUME;
Ingo Molnar5f921ae2006-03-26 01:37:17 -0800532 mutex_lock(&sem_ids.mutex);
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700533 if (cmd == SEM_INFO) {
534 seminfo.semusz = sem_ids.in_use;
535 seminfo.semaem = used_sems;
536 } else {
537 seminfo.semusz = SEMUSZ;
538 seminfo.semaem = SEMAEM;
539 }
540 max_id = sem_ids.max_id;
Ingo Molnar5f921ae2006-03-26 01:37:17 -0800541 mutex_unlock(&sem_ids.mutex);
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700542 if (copy_to_user (arg.__buf, &seminfo, sizeof(struct seminfo)))
543 return -EFAULT;
544 return (max_id < 0) ? 0: max_id;
545 }
546 case SEM_STAT:
547 {
548 struct semid64_ds tbuf;
549 int id;
550
551 if(semid >= sem_ids.entries->size)
552 return -EINVAL;
553
554 memset(&tbuf,0,sizeof(tbuf));
555
556 sma = sem_lock(semid);
557 if(sma == NULL)
558 return -EINVAL;
559
560 err = -EACCES;
561 if (ipcperms (&sma->sem_perm, S_IRUGO))
562 goto out_unlock;
563
564 err = security_sem_semctl(sma, cmd);
565 if (err)
566 goto out_unlock;
567
568 id = sem_buildid(semid, sma->sem_perm.seq);
569
570 kernel_to_ipc64_perm(&sma->sem_perm, &tbuf.sem_perm);
571 tbuf.sem_otime = sma->sem_otime;
572 tbuf.sem_ctime = sma->sem_ctime;
573 tbuf.sem_nsems = sma->sem_nsems;
574 sem_unlock(sma);
575 if (copy_semid_to_user (arg.buf, &tbuf, version))
576 return -EFAULT;
577 return id;
578 }
579 default:
580 return -EINVAL;
581 }
582 return err;
583out_unlock:
584 sem_unlock(sma);
585 return err;
586}
587
588static int semctl_main(int semid, int semnum, int cmd, int version, union semun arg)
589{
590 struct sem_array *sma;
591 struct sem* curr;
592 int err;
593 ushort fast_sem_io[SEMMSL_FAST];
594 ushort* sem_io = fast_sem_io;
595 int nsems;
596
597 sma = sem_lock(semid);
598 if(sma==NULL)
599 return -EINVAL;
600
601 nsems = sma->sem_nsems;
602
603 err=-EIDRM;
604 if (sem_checkid(sma,semid))
605 goto out_unlock;
606
607 err = -EACCES;
608 if (ipcperms (&sma->sem_perm, (cmd==SETVAL||cmd==SETALL)?S_IWUGO:S_IRUGO))
609 goto out_unlock;
610
611 err = security_sem_semctl(sma, cmd);
612 if (err)
613 goto out_unlock;
614
615 err = -EACCES;
616 switch (cmd) {
617 case GETALL:
618 {
619 ushort __user *array = arg.array;
620 int i;
621
622 if(nsems > SEMMSL_FAST) {
623 ipc_rcu_getref(sma);
624 sem_unlock(sma);
625
626 sem_io = ipc_alloc(sizeof(ushort)*nsems);
627 if(sem_io == NULL) {
628 ipc_lock_by_ptr(&sma->sem_perm);
629 ipc_rcu_putref(sma);
630 sem_unlock(sma);
631 return -ENOMEM;
632 }
633
634 ipc_lock_by_ptr(&sma->sem_perm);
635 ipc_rcu_putref(sma);
636 if (sma->sem_perm.deleted) {
637 sem_unlock(sma);
638 err = -EIDRM;
639 goto out_free;
640 }
641 }
642
643 for (i = 0; i < sma->sem_nsems; i++)
644 sem_io[i] = sma->sem_base[i].semval;
645 sem_unlock(sma);
646 err = 0;
647 if(copy_to_user(array, sem_io, nsems*sizeof(ushort)))
648 err = -EFAULT;
649 goto out_free;
650 }
651 case SETALL:
652 {
653 int i;
654 struct sem_undo *un;
655
656 ipc_rcu_getref(sma);
657 sem_unlock(sma);
658
659 if(nsems > SEMMSL_FAST) {
660 sem_io = ipc_alloc(sizeof(ushort)*nsems);
661 if(sem_io == NULL) {
662 ipc_lock_by_ptr(&sma->sem_perm);
663 ipc_rcu_putref(sma);
664 sem_unlock(sma);
665 return -ENOMEM;
666 }
667 }
668
669 if (copy_from_user (sem_io, arg.array, nsems*sizeof(ushort))) {
670 ipc_lock_by_ptr(&sma->sem_perm);
671 ipc_rcu_putref(sma);
672 sem_unlock(sma);
673 err = -EFAULT;
674 goto out_free;
675 }
676
677 for (i = 0; i < nsems; i++) {
678 if (sem_io[i] > SEMVMX) {
679 ipc_lock_by_ptr(&sma->sem_perm);
680 ipc_rcu_putref(sma);
681 sem_unlock(sma);
682 err = -ERANGE;
683 goto out_free;
684 }
685 }
686 ipc_lock_by_ptr(&sma->sem_perm);
687 ipc_rcu_putref(sma);
688 if (sma->sem_perm.deleted) {
689 sem_unlock(sma);
690 err = -EIDRM;
691 goto out_free;
692 }
693
694 for (i = 0; i < nsems; i++)
695 sma->sem_base[i].semval = sem_io[i];
696 for (un = sma->undo; un; un = un->id_next)
697 for (i = 0; i < nsems; i++)
698 un->semadj[i] = 0;
699 sma->sem_ctime = get_seconds();
700 /* maybe some queued-up processes were waiting for this */
701 update_queue(sma);
702 err = 0;
703 goto out_unlock;
704 }
705 case IPC_STAT:
706 {
707 struct semid64_ds tbuf;
708 memset(&tbuf,0,sizeof(tbuf));
709 kernel_to_ipc64_perm(&sma->sem_perm, &tbuf.sem_perm);
710 tbuf.sem_otime = sma->sem_otime;
711 tbuf.sem_ctime = sma->sem_ctime;
712 tbuf.sem_nsems = sma->sem_nsems;
713 sem_unlock(sma);
714 if (copy_semid_to_user (arg.buf, &tbuf, version))
715 return -EFAULT;
716 return 0;
717 }
718 /* GETVAL, GETPID, GETNCTN, GETZCNT, SETVAL: fall-through */
719 }
720 err = -EINVAL;
721 if(semnum < 0 || semnum >= nsems)
722 goto out_unlock;
723
724 curr = &sma->sem_base[semnum];
725
726 switch (cmd) {
727 case GETVAL:
728 err = curr->semval;
729 goto out_unlock;
730 case GETPID:
731 err = curr->sempid;
732 goto out_unlock;
733 case GETNCNT:
734 err = count_semncnt(sma,semnum);
735 goto out_unlock;
736 case GETZCNT:
737 err = count_semzcnt(sma,semnum);
738 goto out_unlock;
739 case SETVAL:
740 {
741 int val = arg.val;
742 struct sem_undo *un;
743 err = -ERANGE;
744 if (val > SEMVMX || val < 0)
745 goto out_unlock;
746
747 for (un = sma->undo; un; un = un->id_next)
748 un->semadj[semnum] = 0;
749 curr->semval = val;
750 curr->sempid = current->tgid;
751 sma->sem_ctime = get_seconds();
752 /* maybe some queued-up processes were waiting for this */
753 update_queue(sma);
754 err = 0;
755 goto out_unlock;
756 }
757 }
758out_unlock:
759 sem_unlock(sma);
760out_free:
761 if(sem_io != fast_sem_io)
762 ipc_free(sem_io, sizeof(ushort)*nsems);
763 return err;
764}
765
766struct sem_setbuf {
767 uid_t uid;
768 gid_t gid;
769 mode_t mode;
770};
771
772static inline unsigned long copy_semid_from_user(struct sem_setbuf *out, void __user *buf, int version)
773{
774 switch(version) {
775 case IPC_64:
776 {
777 struct semid64_ds tbuf;
778
779 if(copy_from_user(&tbuf, buf, sizeof(tbuf)))
780 return -EFAULT;
781
782 out->uid = tbuf.sem_perm.uid;
783 out->gid = tbuf.sem_perm.gid;
784 out->mode = tbuf.sem_perm.mode;
785
786 return 0;
787 }
788 case IPC_OLD:
789 {
790 struct semid_ds tbuf_old;
791
792 if(copy_from_user(&tbuf_old, buf, sizeof(tbuf_old)))
793 return -EFAULT;
794
795 out->uid = tbuf_old.sem_perm.uid;
796 out->gid = tbuf_old.sem_perm.gid;
797 out->mode = tbuf_old.sem_perm.mode;
798
799 return 0;
800 }
801 default:
802 return -EINVAL;
803 }
804}
805
806static int semctl_down(int semid, int semnum, int cmd, int version, union semun arg)
807{
808 struct sem_array *sma;
809 int err;
810 struct sem_setbuf setbuf;
811 struct kern_ipc_perm *ipcp;
812
813 if(cmd == IPC_SET) {
814 if(copy_semid_from_user (&setbuf, arg.buf, version))
815 return -EFAULT;
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700816 }
817 sma = sem_lock(semid);
818 if(sma==NULL)
819 return -EINVAL;
820
821 if (sem_checkid(sma,semid)) {
822 err=-EIDRM;
823 goto out_unlock;
824 }
825 ipcp = &sma->sem_perm;
Steve Grubb073115d2006-04-02 17:07:33 -0400826
827 err = audit_ipc_obj(ipcp);
828 if (err)
829 goto out_unlock;
830
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700831 if (current->euid != ipcp->cuid &&
832 current->euid != ipcp->uid && !capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN)) {
833 err=-EPERM;
834 goto out_unlock;
835 }
836
837 err = security_sem_semctl(sma, cmd);
838 if (err)
839 goto out_unlock;
840
841 switch(cmd){
842 case IPC_RMID:
843 freeary(sma, semid);
844 err = 0;
845 break;
846 case IPC_SET:
Steve Grubb073115d2006-04-02 17:07:33 -0400847 err = audit_ipc_set_perm(0, setbuf.uid, setbuf.gid, setbuf.mode, ipcp);
848 if (err)
Dustin Kirkland8c8570f2005-11-03 17:15:16 +0000849 goto out_unlock;
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700850 ipcp->uid = setbuf.uid;
851 ipcp->gid = setbuf.gid;
852 ipcp->mode = (ipcp->mode & ~S_IRWXUGO)
853 | (setbuf.mode & S_IRWXUGO);
854 sma->sem_ctime = get_seconds();
855 sem_unlock(sma);
856 err = 0;
857 break;
858 default:
859 sem_unlock(sma);
860 err = -EINVAL;
861 break;
862 }
863 return err;
864
865out_unlock:
866 sem_unlock(sma);
867 return err;
868}
869
870asmlinkage long sys_semctl (int semid, int semnum, int cmd, union semun arg)
871{
872 int err = -EINVAL;
873 int version;
874
875 if (semid < 0)
876 return -EINVAL;
877
878 version = ipc_parse_version(&cmd);
879
880 switch(cmd) {
881 case IPC_INFO:
882 case SEM_INFO:
883 case SEM_STAT:
884 err = semctl_nolock(semid,semnum,cmd,version,arg);
885 return err;
886 case GETALL:
887 case GETVAL:
888 case GETPID:
889 case GETNCNT:
890 case GETZCNT:
891 case IPC_STAT:
892 case SETVAL:
893 case SETALL:
894 err = semctl_main(semid,semnum,cmd,version,arg);
895 return err;
896 case IPC_RMID:
897 case IPC_SET:
Ingo Molnar5f921ae2006-03-26 01:37:17 -0800898 mutex_lock(&sem_ids.mutex);
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700899 err = semctl_down(semid,semnum,cmd,version,arg);
Ingo Molnar5f921ae2006-03-26 01:37:17 -0800900 mutex_unlock(&sem_ids.mutex);
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700901 return err;
902 default:
903 return -EINVAL;
904 }
905}
906
907static inline void lock_semundo(void)
908{
909 struct sem_undo_list *undo_list;
910
911 undo_list = current->sysvsem.undo_list;
Ingo Molnar00a5dfd2005-08-05 23:05:27 +0200912 if (undo_list)
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700913 spin_lock(&undo_list->lock);
914}
915
916/* This code has an interaction with copy_semundo().
917 * Consider; two tasks are sharing the undo_list. task1
918 * acquires the undo_list lock in lock_semundo(). If task2 now
919 * exits before task1 releases the lock (by calling
920 * unlock_semundo()), then task1 will never call spin_unlock().
921 * This leave the sem_undo_list in a locked state. If task1 now creats task3
922 * and once again shares the sem_undo_list, the sem_undo_list will still be
923 * locked, and future SEM_UNDO operations will deadlock. This case is
924 * dealt with in copy_semundo() by having it reinitialize the spin lock when
925 * the refcnt goes from 1 to 2.
926 */
927static inline void unlock_semundo(void)
928{
929 struct sem_undo_list *undo_list;
930
931 undo_list = current->sysvsem.undo_list;
Ingo Molnar00a5dfd2005-08-05 23:05:27 +0200932 if (undo_list)
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700933 spin_unlock(&undo_list->lock);
934}
935
936
937/* If the task doesn't already have a undo_list, then allocate one
938 * here. We guarantee there is only one thread using this undo list,
939 * and current is THE ONE
940 *
941 * If this allocation and assignment succeeds, but later
942 * portions of this code fail, there is no need to free the sem_undo_list.
943 * Just let it stay associated with the task, and it'll be freed later
944 * at exit time.
945 *
946 * This can block, so callers must hold no locks.
947 */
948static inline int get_undo_list(struct sem_undo_list **undo_listp)
949{
950 struct sem_undo_list *undo_list;
951 int size;
952
953 undo_list = current->sysvsem.undo_list;
954 if (!undo_list) {
955 size = sizeof(struct sem_undo_list);
956 undo_list = (struct sem_undo_list *) kmalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
957 if (undo_list == NULL)
958 return -ENOMEM;
959 memset(undo_list, 0, size);
Ingo Molnar00a5dfd2005-08-05 23:05:27 +0200960 spin_lock_init(&undo_list->lock);
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700961 atomic_set(&undo_list->refcnt, 1);
962 current->sysvsem.undo_list = undo_list;
963 }
964 *undo_listp = undo_list;
965 return 0;
966}
967
968static struct sem_undo *lookup_undo(struct sem_undo_list *ulp, int semid)
969{
970 struct sem_undo **last, *un;
971
972 last = &ulp->proc_list;
973 un = *last;
974 while(un != NULL) {
975 if(un->semid==semid)
976 break;
977 if(un->semid==-1) {
978 *last=un->proc_next;
979 kfree(un);
980 } else {
981 last=&un->proc_next;
982 }
983 un=*last;
984 }
985 return un;
986}
987
988static struct sem_undo *find_undo(int semid)
989{
990 struct sem_array *sma;
991 struct sem_undo_list *ulp;
992 struct sem_undo *un, *new;
993 int nsems;
994 int error;
995
996 error = get_undo_list(&ulp);
997 if (error)
998 return ERR_PTR(error);
999
1000 lock_semundo();
1001 un = lookup_undo(ulp, semid);
1002 unlock_semundo();
1003 if (likely(un!=NULL))
1004 goto out;
1005
1006 /* no undo structure around - allocate one. */
1007 sma = sem_lock(semid);
1008 un = ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
1009 if(sma==NULL)
1010 goto out;
1011 un = ERR_PTR(-EIDRM);
1012 if (sem_checkid(sma,semid)) {
1013 sem_unlock(sma);
1014 goto out;
1015 }
1016 nsems = sma->sem_nsems;
1017 ipc_rcu_getref(sma);
1018 sem_unlock(sma);
1019
1020 new = (struct sem_undo *) kmalloc(sizeof(struct sem_undo) + sizeof(short)*nsems, GFP_KERNEL);
1021 if (!new) {
1022 ipc_lock_by_ptr(&sma->sem_perm);
1023 ipc_rcu_putref(sma);
1024 sem_unlock(sma);
1025 return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
1026 }
1027 memset(new, 0, sizeof(struct sem_undo) + sizeof(short)*nsems);
1028 new->semadj = (short *) &new[1];
1029 new->semid = semid;
1030
1031 lock_semundo();
1032 un = lookup_undo(ulp, semid);
1033 if (un) {
1034 unlock_semundo();
1035 kfree(new);
1036 ipc_lock_by_ptr(&sma->sem_perm);
1037 ipc_rcu_putref(sma);
1038 sem_unlock(sma);
1039 goto out;
1040 }
1041 ipc_lock_by_ptr(&sma->sem_perm);
1042 ipc_rcu_putref(sma);
1043 if (sma->sem_perm.deleted) {
1044 sem_unlock(sma);
1045 unlock_semundo();
1046 kfree(new);
1047 un = ERR_PTR(-EIDRM);
1048 goto out;
1049 }
1050 new->proc_next = ulp->proc_list;
1051 ulp->proc_list = new;
1052 new->id_next = sma->undo;
1053 sma->undo = new;
1054 sem_unlock(sma);
1055 un = new;
1056 unlock_semundo();
1057out:
1058 return un;
1059}
1060
1061asmlinkage long sys_semtimedop(int semid, struct sembuf __user *tsops,
1062 unsigned nsops, const struct timespec __user *timeout)
1063{
1064 int error = -EINVAL;
1065 struct sem_array *sma;
1066 struct sembuf fast_sops[SEMOPM_FAST];
1067 struct sembuf* sops = fast_sops, *sop;
1068 struct sem_undo *un;
Manfred Spraulb78755a2005-06-23 00:10:06 -07001069 int undos = 0, alter = 0, max;
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07001070 struct sem_queue queue;
1071 unsigned long jiffies_left = 0;
1072
1073 if (nsops < 1 || semid < 0)
1074 return -EINVAL;
1075 if (nsops > sc_semopm)
1076 return -E2BIG;
1077 if(nsops > SEMOPM_FAST) {
1078 sops = kmalloc(sizeof(*sops)*nsops,GFP_KERNEL);
1079 if(sops==NULL)
1080 return -ENOMEM;
1081 }
1082 if (copy_from_user (sops, tsops, nsops * sizeof(*tsops))) {
1083 error=-EFAULT;
1084 goto out_free;
1085 }
1086 if (timeout) {
1087 struct timespec _timeout;
1088 if (copy_from_user(&_timeout, timeout, sizeof(*timeout))) {
1089 error = -EFAULT;
1090 goto out_free;
1091 }
1092 if (_timeout.tv_sec < 0 || _timeout.tv_nsec < 0 ||
1093 _timeout.tv_nsec >= 1000000000L) {
1094 error = -EINVAL;
1095 goto out_free;
1096 }
1097 jiffies_left = timespec_to_jiffies(&_timeout);
1098 }
1099 max = 0;
1100 for (sop = sops; sop < sops + nsops; sop++) {
1101 if (sop->sem_num >= max)
1102 max = sop->sem_num;
1103 if (sop->sem_flg & SEM_UNDO)
Manfred Spraulb78755a2005-06-23 00:10:06 -07001104 undos = 1;
1105 if (sop->sem_op != 0)
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07001106 alter = 1;
1107 }
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07001108
1109retry_undos:
1110 if (undos) {
1111 un = find_undo(semid);
1112 if (IS_ERR(un)) {
1113 error = PTR_ERR(un);
1114 goto out_free;
1115 }
1116 } else
1117 un = NULL;
1118
1119 sma = sem_lock(semid);
1120 error=-EINVAL;
1121 if(sma==NULL)
1122 goto out_free;
1123 error = -EIDRM;
1124 if (sem_checkid(sma,semid))
1125 goto out_unlock_free;
1126 /*
1127 * semid identifies are not unique - find_undo may have
1128 * allocated an undo structure, it was invalidated by an RMID
1129 * and now a new array with received the same id. Check and retry.
1130 */
1131 if (un && un->semid == -1) {
1132 sem_unlock(sma);
1133 goto retry_undos;
1134 }
1135 error = -EFBIG;
1136 if (max >= sma->sem_nsems)
1137 goto out_unlock_free;
1138
1139 error = -EACCES;
1140 if (ipcperms(&sma->sem_perm, alter ? S_IWUGO : S_IRUGO))
1141 goto out_unlock_free;
1142
1143 error = security_sem_semop(sma, sops, nsops, alter);
1144 if (error)
1145 goto out_unlock_free;
1146
1147 error = try_atomic_semop (sma, sops, nsops, un, current->tgid);
1148 if (error <= 0) {
1149 if (alter && error == 0)
1150 update_queue (sma);
1151 goto out_unlock_free;
1152 }
1153
1154 /* We need to sleep on this operation, so we put the current
1155 * task into the pending queue and go to sleep.
1156 */
1157
1158 queue.sma = sma;
1159 queue.sops = sops;
1160 queue.nsops = nsops;
1161 queue.undo = un;
1162 queue.pid = current->tgid;
1163 queue.id = semid;
1164 queue.alter = alter;
1165 if (alter)
1166 append_to_queue(sma ,&queue);
1167 else
1168 prepend_to_queue(sma ,&queue);
1169
1170 queue.status = -EINTR;
1171 queue.sleeper = current;
1172 current->state = TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE;
1173 sem_unlock(sma);
1174
1175 if (timeout)
1176 jiffies_left = schedule_timeout(jiffies_left);
1177 else
1178 schedule();
1179
1180 error = queue.status;
1181 while(unlikely(error == IN_WAKEUP)) {
1182 cpu_relax();
1183 error = queue.status;
1184 }
1185
1186 if (error != -EINTR) {
1187 /* fast path: update_queue already obtained all requested
1188 * resources */
1189 goto out_free;
1190 }
1191
1192 sma = sem_lock(semid);
1193 if(sma==NULL) {
Eric Sesterhenn27315c92006-03-26 18:28:38 +02001194 BUG_ON(queue.prev != NULL);
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07001195 error = -EIDRM;
1196 goto out_free;
1197 }
1198
1199 /*
1200 * If queue.status != -EINTR we are woken up by another process
1201 */
1202 error = queue.status;
1203 if (error != -EINTR) {
1204 goto out_unlock_free;
1205 }
1206
1207 /*
1208 * If an interrupt occurred we have to clean up the queue
1209 */
1210 if (timeout && jiffies_left == 0)
1211 error = -EAGAIN;
1212 remove_from_queue(sma,&queue);
1213 goto out_unlock_free;
1214
1215out_unlock_free:
1216 sem_unlock(sma);
1217out_free:
1218 if(sops != fast_sops)
1219 kfree(sops);
1220 return error;
1221}
1222
1223asmlinkage long sys_semop (int semid, struct sembuf __user *tsops, unsigned nsops)
1224{
1225 return sys_semtimedop(semid, tsops, nsops, NULL);
1226}
1227
1228/* If CLONE_SYSVSEM is set, establish sharing of SEM_UNDO state between
1229 * parent and child tasks.
1230 *
1231 * See the notes above unlock_semundo() regarding the spin_lock_init()
1232 * in this code. Initialize the undo_list->lock here instead of get_undo_list()
1233 * because of the reasoning in the comment above unlock_semundo.
1234 */
1235
1236int copy_semundo(unsigned long clone_flags, struct task_struct *tsk)
1237{
1238 struct sem_undo_list *undo_list;
1239 int error;
1240
1241 if (clone_flags & CLONE_SYSVSEM) {
1242 error = get_undo_list(&undo_list);
1243 if (error)
1244 return error;
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07001245 atomic_inc(&undo_list->refcnt);
1246 tsk->sysvsem.undo_list = undo_list;
1247 } else
1248 tsk->sysvsem.undo_list = NULL;
1249
1250 return 0;
1251}
1252
1253/*
1254 * add semadj values to semaphores, free undo structures.
1255 * undo structures are not freed when semaphore arrays are destroyed
1256 * so some of them may be out of date.
1257 * IMPLEMENTATION NOTE: There is some confusion over whether the
1258 * set of adjustments that needs to be done should be done in an atomic
1259 * manner or not. That is, if we are attempting to decrement the semval
1260 * should we queue up and wait until we can do so legally?
1261 * The original implementation attempted to do this (queue and wait).
1262 * The current implementation does not do so. The POSIX standard
1263 * and SVID should be consulted to determine what behavior is mandated.
1264 */
1265void exit_sem(struct task_struct *tsk)
1266{
1267 struct sem_undo_list *undo_list;
1268 struct sem_undo *u, **up;
1269
1270 undo_list = tsk->sysvsem.undo_list;
1271 if (!undo_list)
1272 return;
1273
1274 if (!atomic_dec_and_test(&undo_list->refcnt))
1275 return;
1276
1277 /* There's no need to hold the semundo list lock, as current
1278 * is the last task exiting for this undo list.
1279 */
1280 for (up = &undo_list->proc_list; (u = *up); *up = u->proc_next, kfree(u)) {
1281 struct sem_array *sma;
1282 int nsems, i;
1283 struct sem_undo *un, **unp;
1284 int semid;
1285
1286 semid = u->semid;
1287
1288 if(semid == -1)
1289 continue;
1290 sma = sem_lock(semid);
1291 if (sma == NULL)
1292 continue;
1293
1294 if (u->semid == -1)
1295 goto next_entry;
1296
1297 BUG_ON(sem_checkid(sma,u->semid));
1298
1299 /* remove u from the sma->undo list */
1300 for (unp = &sma->undo; (un = *unp); unp = &un->id_next) {
1301 if (u == un)
1302 goto found;
1303 }
1304 printk ("exit_sem undo list error id=%d\n", u->semid);
1305 goto next_entry;
1306found:
1307 *unp = un->id_next;
1308 /* perform adjustments registered in u */
1309 nsems = sma->sem_nsems;
1310 for (i = 0; i < nsems; i++) {
Ingo Molnar5f921ae2006-03-26 01:37:17 -08001311 struct sem * semaphore = &sma->sem_base[i];
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07001312 if (u->semadj[i]) {
Ingo Molnar5f921ae2006-03-26 01:37:17 -08001313 semaphore->semval += u->semadj[i];
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07001314 /*
1315 * Range checks of the new semaphore value,
1316 * not defined by sus:
1317 * - Some unices ignore the undo entirely
1318 * (e.g. HP UX 11i 11.22, Tru64 V5.1)
1319 * - some cap the value (e.g. FreeBSD caps
1320 * at 0, but doesn't enforce SEMVMX)
1321 *
1322 * Linux caps the semaphore value, both at 0
1323 * and at SEMVMX.
1324 *
1325 * Manfred <manfred@colorfullife.com>
1326 */
Ingo Molnar5f921ae2006-03-26 01:37:17 -08001327 if (semaphore->semval < 0)
1328 semaphore->semval = 0;
1329 if (semaphore->semval > SEMVMX)
1330 semaphore->semval = SEMVMX;
1331 semaphore->sempid = current->tgid;
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07001332 }
1333 }
1334 sma->sem_otime = get_seconds();
1335 /* maybe some queued-up processes were waiting for this */
1336 update_queue(sma);
1337next_entry:
1338 sem_unlock(sma);
1339 }
1340 kfree(undo_list);
1341}
1342
1343#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
Mike Waychison19b49462005-09-06 15:17:10 -07001344static int sysvipc_sem_proc_show(struct seq_file *s, void *it)
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07001345{
Mike Waychison19b49462005-09-06 15:17:10 -07001346 struct sem_array *sma = it;
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07001347
Mike Waychison19b49462005-09-06 15:17:10 -07001348 return seq_printf(s,
1349 "%10d %10d %4o %10lu %5u %5u %5u %5u %10lu %10lu\n",
1350 sma->sem_perm.key,
1351 sma->sem_id,
1352 sma->sem_perm.mode,
1353 sma->sem_nsems,
1354 sma->sem_perm.uid,
1355 sma->sem_perm.gid,
1356 sma->sem_perm.cuid,
1357 sma->sem_perm.cgid,
1358 sma->sem_otime,
1359 sma->sem_ctime);
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07001360}
1361#endif