Linus Torvalds | 1da177e | 2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 1 | /* |
| 2 | * arch/alpha/lib/ev6-copy_page.S |
| 3 | * |
| 4 | * Copy an entire page. |
| 5 | */ |
| 6 | |
| 7 | /* The following comparison of this routine vs the normal copy_page.S |
| 8 | was written by an unnamed ev6 hardware designer and forwarded to me |
| 9 | via Steven Hobbs <hobbs@steven.zko.dec.com>. |
| 10 | |
| 11 | First Problem: STQ overflows. |
| 12 | ----------------------------- |
| 13 | |
| 14 | It would be nice if EV6 handled every resource overflow efficiently, |
| 15 | but for some it doesn't. Including store queue overflows. It causes |
| 16 | a trap and a restart of the pipe. |
| 17 | |
| 18 | To get around this we sometimes use (to borrow a term from a VSSAD |
| 19 | researcher) "aeration". The idea is to slow the rate at which the |
| 20 | processor receives valid instructions by inserting nops in the fetch |
| 21 | path. In doing so, you can prevent the overflow and actually make |
| 22 | the code run faster. You can, of course, take advantage of the fact |
| 23 | that the processor can fetch at most 4 aligned instructions per cycle. |
| 24 | |
| 25 | I inserted enough nops to force it to take 10 cycles to fetch the |
| 26 | loop code. In theory, EV6 should be able to execute this loop in |
| 27 | 9 cycles but I was not able to get it to run that fast -- the initial |
| 28 | conditions were such that I could not reach this optimum rate on |
| 29 | (chaotic) EV6. I wrote the code such that everything would issue |
| 30 | in order. |
| 31 | |
| 32 | Second Problem: Dcache index matches. |
| 33 | ------------------------------------- |
| 34 | |
| 35 | If you are going to use this routine on random aligned pages, there |
| 36 | is a 25% chance that the pages will be at the same dcache indices. |
| 37 | This results in many nasty memory traps without care. |
| 38 | |
| 39 | The solution is to schedule the prefetches to avoid the memory |
| 40 | conflicts. I schedule the wh64 prefetches farther ahead of the |
| 41 | read prefetches to avoid this problem. |
| 42 | |
| 43 | Third Problem: Needs more prefetching. |
| 44 | -------------------------------------- |
| 45 | |
| 46 | In order to improve the code I added deeper prefetching to take the |
| 47 | most advantage of EV6's bandwidth. |
| 48 | |
| 49 | I also prefetched the read stream. Note that adding the read prefetch |
| 50 | forced me to add another cycle to the inner-most kernel - up to 11 |
| 51 | from the original 8 cycles per iteration. We could improve performance |
| 52 | further by unrolling the loop and doing multiple prefetches per cycle. |
| 53 | |
| 54 | I think that the code below will be very robust and fast code for the |
| 55 | purposes of copying aligned pages. It is slower when both source and |
| 56 | destination pages are in the dcache, but it is my guess that this is |
| 57 | less important than the dcache miss case. */ |
| 58 | |
| 59 | |
| 60 | .text |
| 61 | .align 4 |
| 62 | .global copy_page |
| 63 | .ent copy_page |
| 64 | copy_page: |
| 65 | .prologue 0 |
| 66 | |
| 67 | /* Prefetch 5 read cachelines; write-hint 10 cache lines. */ |
| 68 | wh64 ($16) |
| 69 | ldl $31,0($17) |
| 70 | ldl $31,64($17) |
| 71 | lda $1,1*64($16) |
| 72 | |
| 73 | wh64 ($1) |
| 74 | ldl $31,128($17) |
| 75 | ldl $31,192($17) |
| 76 | lda $1,2*64($16) |
| 77 | |
| 78 | wh64 ($1) |
| 79 | ldl $31,256($17) |
| 80 | lda $18,118 |
| 81 | lda $1,3*64($16) |
| 82 | |
| 83 | wh64 ($1) |
| 84 | nop |
| 85 | lda $1,4*64($16) |
| 86 | lda $2,5*64($16) |
| 87 | |
| 88 | wh64 ($1) |
| 89 | wh64 ($2) |
| 90 | lda $1,6*64($16) |
| 91 | lda $2,7*64($16) |
| 92 | |
| 93 | wh64 ($1) |
| 94 | wh64 ($2) |
| 95 | lda $1,8*64($16) |
| 96 | lda $2,9*64($16) |
| 97 | |
| 98 | wh64 ($1) |
| 99 | wh64 ($2) |
| 100 | lda $19,10*64($16) |
| 101 | nop |
| 102 | |
| 103 | /* Main prefetching/write-hinting loop. */ |
| 104 | 1: ldq $0,0($17) |
| 105 | ldq $1,8($17) |
| 106 | unop |
| 107 | unop |
| 108 | |
| 109 | unop |
| 110 | unop |
| 111 | ldq $2,16($17) |
| 112 | ldq $3,24($17) |
| 113 | |
| 114 | ldq $4,32($17) |
| 115 | ldq $5,40($17) |
| 116 | unop |
| 117 | unop |
| 118 | |
| 119 | unop |
| 120 | unop |
| 121 | ldq $6,48($17) |
| 122 | ldq $7,56($17) |
| 123 | |
| 124 | ldl $31,320($17) |
| 125 | unop |
| 126 | unop |
| 127 | unop |
| 128 | |
| 129 | /* This gives the extra cycle of aeration above the minimum. */ |
| 130 | unop |
| 131 | unop |
| 132 | unop |
| 133 | unop |
| 134 | |
| 135 | wh64 ($19) |
| 136 | unop |
| 137 | unop |
| 138 | unop |
| 139 | |
| 140 | stq $0,0($16) |
| 141 | subq $18,1,$18 |
| 142 | stq $1,8($16) |
| 143 | unop |
| 144 | |
| 145 | unop |
| 146 | stq $2,16($16) |
| 147 | addq $17,64,$17 |
| 148 | stq $3,24($16) |
| 149 | |
| 150 | stq $4,32($16) |
| 151 | stq $5,40($16) |
| 152 | addq $19,64,$19 |
| 153 | unop |
| 154 | |
| 155 | stq $6,48($16) |
| 156 | stq $7,56($16) |
| 157 | addq $16,64,$16 |
| 158 | bne $18, 1b |
| 159 | |
| 160 | /* Prefetch the final 5 cache lines of the read stream. */ |
| 161 | lda $18,10 |
| 162 | ldl $31,320($17) |
| 163 | ldl $31,384($17) |
| 164 | ldl $31,448($17) |
| 165 | |
| 166 | ldl $31,512($17) |
| 167 | ldl $31,576($17) |
| 168 | nop |
| 169 | nop |
| 170 | |
| 171 | /* Non-prefetching, non-write-hinting cleanup loop for the |
| 172 | final 10 cache lines. */ |
| 173 | 2: ldq $0,0($17) |
| 174 | ldq $1,8($17) |
| 175 | ldq $2,16($17) |
| 176 | ldq $3,24($17) |
| 177 | |
| 178 | ldq $4,32($17) |
| 179 | ldq $5,40($17) |
| 180 | ldq $6,48($17) |
| 181 | ldq $7,56($17) |
| 182 | |
| 183 | stq $0,0($16) |
| 184 | subq $18,1,$18 |
| 185 | stq $1,8($16) |
| 186 | addq $17,64,$17 |
| 187 | |
| 188 | stq $2,16($16) |
| 189 | stq $3,24($16) |
| 190 | stq $4,32($16) |
| 191 | stq $5,40($16) |
| 192 | |
| 193 | stq $6,48($16) |
| 194 | stq $7,56($16) |
| 195 | addq $16,64,$16 |
| 196 | bne $18, 2b |
| 197 | |
| 198 | ret |
| 199 | nop |
| 200 | unop |
| 201 | nop |
| 202 | |
| 203 | .end copy_page |