Robert Jarzmik | 16eea6b | 2015-05-25 23:29:18 +0200 | [diff] [blame] | 1 | PXA/MMP - DMA Slave controller |
| 2 | ============================== |
| 3 | |
| 4 | Constraints |
| 5 | ----------- |
| 6 | a) Transfers hot queuing |
| 7 | A driver submitting a transfer and issuing it should be granted the transfer |
| 8 | is queued even on a running DMA channel. |
| 9 | This implies that the queuing doesn't wait for the previous transfer end, |
| 10 | and that the descriptor chaining is not only done in the irq/tasklet code |
| 11 | triggered by the end of the transfer. |
| 12 | A transfer which is submitted and issued on a phy doesn't wait for a phy to |
| 13 | stop and restart, but is submitted on a "running channel". The other |
| 14 | drivers, especially mmp_pdma waited for the phy to stop before relaunching |
| 15 | a new transfer. |
| 16 | |
| 17 | b) All transfers having asked for confirmation should be signaled |
| 18 | Any issued transfer with DMA_PREP_INTERRUPT should trigger a callback call. |
| 19 | This implies that even if an irq/tasklet is triggered by end of tx1, but |
| 20 | at the time of irq/dma tx2 is already finished, tx1->complete() and |
| 21 | tx2->complete() should be called. |
| 22 | |
| 23 | c) Channel running state |
| 24 | A driver should be able to query if a channel is running or not. For the |
| 25 | multimedia case, such as video capture, if a transfer is submitted and then |
| 26 | a check of the DMA channel reports a "stopped channel", the transfer should |
| 27 | not be issued until the next "start of frame interrupt", hence the need to |
| 28 | know if a channel is in running or stopped state. |
| 29 | |
| 30 | d) Bandwidth guarantee |
| 31 | The PXA architecture has 4 levels of DMAs priorities : high, normal, low. |
| 32 | The high prorities get twice as much bandwidth as the normal, which get twice |
| 33 | as much as the low priorities. |
| 34 | A driver should be able to request a priority, especially the real-time |
| 35 | ones such as pxa_camera with (big) throughputs. |
| 36 | |
| 37 | Design |
| 38 | ------ |
| 39 | a) Virtual channels |
| 40 | Same concept as in sa11x0 driver, ie. a driver was assigned a "virtual |
| 41 | channel" linked to the requestor line, and the physical DMA channel is |
| 42 | assigned on the fly when the transfer is issued. |
| 43 | |
| 44 | b) Transfer anatomy for a scatter-gather transfer |
| 45 | +------------+-----+---------------+----------------+-----------------+ |
| 46 | | desc-sg[0] | ... | desc-sg[last] | status updater | finisher/linker | |
| 47 | +------------+-----+---------------+----------------+-----------------+ |
| 48 | |
| 49 | This structure is pointed by dma->sg_cpu. |
| 50 | The descriptors are used as follows : |
| 51 | - desc-sg[i]: i-th descriptor, transferring the i-th sg |
| 52 | element to the video buffer scatter gather |
| 53 | - status updater |
| 54 | Transfers a single u32 to a well known dma coherent memory to leave |
| 55 | a trace that this transfer is done. The "well known" is unique per |
| 56 | physical channel, meaning that a read of this value will tell which |
| 57 | is the last finished transfer at that point in time. |
| 58 | - finisher: has ddadr=DADDR_STOP, dcmd=ENDIRQEN |
| 59 | - linker: has ddadr= desc-sg[0] of next transfer, dcmd=0 |
| 60 | |
| 61 | c) Transfers hot-chaining |
| 62 | Suppose the running chain is : |
| 63 | Buffer 1 Buffer 2 |
| 64 | +---------+----+---+ +----+----+----+---+ |
| 65 | | d0 | .. | dN | l | | d0 | .. | dN | f | |
| 66 | +---------+----+-|-+ ^----+----+----+---+ |
| 67 | | | |
| 68 | +----+ |
| 69 | |
| 70 | After a call to dmaengine_submit(b3), the chain will look like : |
| 71 | Buffer 1 Buffer 2 Buffer 3 |
| 72 | +---------+----+---+ +----+----+----+---+ +----+----+----+---+ |
| 73 | | d0 | .. | dN | l | | d0 | .. | dN | l | | d0 | .. | dN | f | |
| 74 | +---------+----+-|-+ ^----+----+----+-|-+ ^----+----+----+---+ |
| 75 | | | | | |
| 76 | +----+ +----+ |
| 77 | new_link |
| 78 | |
| 79 | If while new_link was created the DMA channel stopped, it is _not_ |
| 80 | restarted. Hot-chaining doesn't break the assumption that |
| 81 | dma_async_issue_pending() is to be used to ensure the transfer is actually started. |
| 82 | |
| 83 | One exception to this rule : |
| 84 | - if Buffer1 and Buffer2 had all their addresses 8 bytes aligned |
| 85 | - and if Buffer3 has at least one address not 4 bytes aligned |
| 86 | - then hot-chaining cannot happen, as the channel must be stopped, the |
| 87 | "align bit" must be set, and the channel restarted As a consequence, |
| 88 | such a transfer tx_submit() will be queued on the submitted queue, and |
| 89 | this specific case if the DMA is already running in aligned mode. |
| 90 | |
| 91 | d) Transfers completion updater |
| 92 | Each time a transfer is completed on a channel, an interrupt might be |
| 93 | generated or not, up to the client's request. But in each case, the last |
| 94 | descriptor of a transfer, the "status updater", will write the latest |
| 95 | transfer being completed into the physical channel's completion mark. |
| 96 | |
| 97 | This will speed up residue calculation, for large transfers such as video |
| 98 | buffers which hold around 6k descriptors or more. This also allows without |
| 99 | any lock to find out what is the latest completed transfer in a running |
| 100 | DMA chain. |
| 101 | |
| 102 | e) Transfers completion, irq and tasklet |
| 103 | When a transfer flagged as "DMA_PREP_INTERRUPT" is finished, the dma irq |
| 104 | is raised. Upon this interrupt, a tasklet is scheduled for the physical |
| 105 | channel. |
| 106 | The tasklet is responsible for : |
| 107 | - reading the physical channel last updater mark |
| 108 | - calling all the transfer callbacks of finished transfers, based on |
| 109 | that mark, and each transfer flags. |
| 110 | If a transfer is completed while this handling is done, a dma irq will |
| 111 | be raised, and the tasklet will be scheduled once again, having a new |
| 112 | updater mark. |
| 113 | |
| 114 | f) Residue |
| 115 | Residue granularity will be descriptor based. The issued but not completed |
| 116 | transfers will be scanned for all of their descriptors against the |
| 117 | currently running descriptor. |
| 118 | |
| 119 | g) Most complicated case of driver's tx queues |
| 120 | The most tricky situation is when : |
| 121 | - there are not "acked" transfers (tx0) |
| 122 | - a driver submitted an aligned tx1, not chained |
| 123 | - a driver submitted an aligned tx2 => tx2 is cold chained to tx1 |
| 124 | - a driver issued tx1+tx2 => channel is running in aligned mode |
| 125 | - a driver submitted an aligned tx3 => tx3 is hot-chained |
| 126 | - a driver submitted an unaligned tx4 => tx4 is put in submitted queue, |
| 127 | not chained |
| 128 | - a driver issued tx4 => tx4 is put in issued queue, not chained |
| 129 | - a driver submitted an aligned tx5 => tx5 is put in submitted queue, not |
| 130 | chained |
| 131 | - a driver submitted an aligned tx6 => tx6 is put in submitted queue, |
| 132 | cold chained to tx5 |
| 133 | |
| 134 | This translates into (after tx4 is issued) : |
| 135 | - issued queue |
| 136 | +-----+ +-----+ +-----+ +-----+ |
| 137 | | tx1 | | tx2 | | tx3 | | tx4 | |
| 138 | +---|-+ ^---|-+ ^-----+ +-----+ |
| 139 | | | | | |
| 140 | +---+ +---+ |
| 141 | - submitted queue |
| 142 | +-----+ +-----+ |
| 143 | | tx5 | | tx6 | |
| 144 | +---|-+ ^-----+ |
| 145 | | | |
| 146 | +---+ |
| 147 | - completed queue : empty |
| 148 | - allocated queue : tx0 |
| 149 | |
| 150 | It should be noted that after tx3 is completed, the channel is stopped, and |
| 151 | restarted in "unaligned mode" to handle tx4. |
| 152 | |
| 153 | Author: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr> |