Jesse Gross | ccb1352 | 2011-10-25 19:26:31 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 1 | Open vSwitch datapath developer documentation |
| 2 | ============================================= |
| 3 | |
| 4 | The Open vSwitch kernel module allows flexible userspace control over |
| 5 | flow-level packet processing on selected network devices. It can be |
| 6 | used to implement a plain Ethernet switch, network device bonding, |
| 7 | VLAN processing, network access control, flow-based network control, |
| 8 | and so on. |
| 9 | |
| 10 | The kernel module implements multiple "datapaths" (analogous to |
| 11 | bridges), each of which can have multiple "vports" (analogous to ports |
| 12 | within a bridge). Each datapath also has associated with it a "flow |
| 13 | table" that userspace populates with "flows" that map from keys based |
| 14 | on packet headers and metadata to sets of actions. The most common |
| 15 | action forwards the packet to another vport; other actions are also |
| 16 | implemented. |
| 17 | |
| 18 | When a packet arrives on a vport, the kernel module processes it by |
| 19 | extracting its flow key and looking it up in the flow table. If there |
| 20 | is a matching flow, it executes the associated actions. If there is |
| 21 | no match, it queues the packet to userspace for processing (as part of |
| 22 | its processing, userspace will likely set up a flow to handle further |
| 23 | packets of the same type entirely in-kernel). |
| 24 | |
| 25 | |
| 26 | Flow key compatibility |
| 27 | ---------------------- |
| 28 | |
| 29 | Network protocols evolve over time. New protocols become important |
| 30 | and existing protocols lose their prominence. For the Open vSwitch |
| 31 | kernel module to remain relevant, it must be possible for newer |
| 32 | versions to parse additional protocols as part of the flow key. It |
| 33 | might even be desirable, someday, to drop support for parsing |
| 34 | protocols that have become obsolete. Therefore, the Netlink interface |
| 35 | to Open vSwitch is designed to allow carefully written userspace |
| 36 | applications to work with any version of the flow key, past or future. |
| 37 | |
| 38 | To support this forward and backward compatibility, whenever the |
| 39 | kernel module passes a packet to userspace, it also passes along the |
| 40 | flow key that it parsed from the packet. Userspace then extracts its |
| 41 | own notion of a flow key from the packet and compares it against the |
| 42 | kernel-provided version: |
| 43 | |
| 44 | - If userspace's notion of the flow key for the packet matches the |
| 45 | kernel's, then nothing special is necessary. |
| 46 | |
| 47 | - If the kernel's flow key includes more fields than the userspace |
| 48 | version of the flow key, for example if the kernel decoded IPv6 |
| 49 | headers but userspace stopped at the Ethernet type (because it |
| 50 | does not understand IPv6), then again nothing special is |
| 51 | necessary. Userspace can still set up a flow in the usual way, |
| 52 | as long as it uses the kernel-provided flow key to do it. |
| 53 | |
| 54 | - If the userspace flow key includes more fields than the |
| 55 | kernel's, for example if userspace decoded an IPv6 header but |
| 56 | the kernel stopped at the Ethernet type, then userspace can |
| 57 | forward the packet manually, without setting up a flow in the |
| 58 | kernel. This case is bad for performance because every packet |
| 59 | that the kernel considers part of the flow must go to userspace, |
| 60 | but the forwarding behavior is correct. (If userspace can |
| 61 | determine that the values of the extra fields would not affect |
| 62 | forwarding behavior, then it could set up a flow anyway.) |
| 63 | |
| 64 | How flow keys evolve over time is important to making this work, so |
| 65 | the following sections go into detail. |
| 66 | |
| 67 | |
| 68 | Flow key format |
| 69 | --------------- |
| 70 | |
| 71 | A flow key is passed over a Netlink socket as a sequence of Netlink |
| 72 | attributes. Some attributes represent packet metadata, defined as any |
| 73 | information about a packet that cannot be extracted from the packet |
| 74 | itself, e.g. the vport on which the packet was received. Most |
| 75 | attributes, however, are extracted from headers within the packet, |
| 76 | e.g. source and destination addresses from Ethernet, IP, or TCP |
| 77 | headers. |
| 78 | |
| 79 | The <linux/openvswitch.h> header file defines the exact format of the |
| 80 | flow key attributes. For informal explanatory purposes here, we write |
| 81 | them as comma-separated strings, with parentheses indicating arguments |
| 82 | and nesting. For example, the following could represent a flow key |
| 83 | corresponding to a TCP packet that arrived on vport 1: |
| 84 | |
| 85 | in_port(1), eth(src=e0:91:f5:21:d0:b2, dst=00:02:e3:0f:80:a4), |
| 86 | eth_type(0x0800), ipv4(src=172.16.0.20, dst=172.18.0.52, proto=17, tos=0, |
| 87 | frag=no), tcp(src=49163, dst=80) |
| 88 | |
| 89 | Often we ellipsize arguments not important to the discussion, e.g.: |
| 90 | |
| 91 | in_port(1), eth(...), eth_type(0x0800), ipv4(...), tcp(...) |
| 92 | |
| 93 | |
| 94 | Basic rule for evolving flow keys |
| 95 | --------------------------------- |
| 96 | |
| 97 | Some care is needed to really maintain forward and backward |
| 98 | compatibility for applications that follow the rules listed under |
| 99 | "Flow key compatibility" above. |
| 100 | |
| 101 | The basic rule is obvious: |
| 102 | |
| 103 | ------------------------------------------------------------------ |
| 104 | New network protocol support must only supplement existing flow |
| 105 | key attributes. It must not change the meaning of already defined |
| 106 | flow key attributes. |
| 107 | ------------------------------------------------------------------ |
| 108 | |
| 109 | This rule does have less-obvious consequences so it is worth working |
| 110 | through a few examples. Suppose, for example, that the kernel module |
| 111 | did not already implement VLAN parsing. Instead, it just interpreted |
| 112 | the 802.1Q TPID (0x8100) as the Ethertype then stopped parsing the |
| 113 | packet. The flow key for any packet with an 802.1Q header would look |
| 114 | essentially like this, ignoring metadata: |
| 115 | |
| 116 | eth(...), eth_type(0x8100) |
| 117 | |
| 118 | Naively, to add VLAN support, it makes sense to add a new "vlan" flow |
| 119 | key attribute to contain the VLAN tag, then continue to decode the |
| 120 | encapsulated headers beyond the VLAN tag using the existing field |
Leo Alterman | efaac3b | 2012-07-20 14:51:07 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 121 | definitions. With this change, a TCP packet in VLAN 10 would have a |
Jesse Gross | ccb1352 | 2011-10-25 19:26:31 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 122 | flow key much like this: |
| 123 | |
| 124 | eth(...), vlan(vid=10, pcp=0), eth_type(0x0800), ip(proto=6, ...), tcp(...) |
| 125 | |
| 126 | But this change would negatively affect a userspace application that |
| 127 | has not been updated to understand the new "vlan" flow key attribute. |
| 128 | The application could, following the flow compatibility rules above, |
| 129 | ignore the "vlan" attribute that it does not understand and therefore |
| 130 | assume that the flow contained IP packets. This is a bad assumption |
| 131 | (the flow only contains IP packets if one parses and skips over the |
| 132 | 802.1Q header) and it could cause the application's behavior to change |
| 133 | across kernel versions even though it follows the compatibility rules. |
| 134 | |
| 135 | The solution is to use a set of nested attributes. This is, for |
| 136 | example, why 802.1Q support uses nested attributes. A TCP packet in |
| 137 | VLAN 10 is actually expressed as: |
| 138 | |
| 139 | eth(...), eth_type(0x8100), vlan(vid=10, pcp=0), encap(eth_type(0x0800), |
| 140 | ip(proto=6, ...), tcp(...))) |
| 141 | |
| 142 | Notice how the "eth_type", "ip", and "tcp" flow key attributes are |
| 143 | nested inside the "encap" attribute. Thus, an application that does |
| 144 | not understand the "vlan" key will not see either of those attributes |
| 145 | and therefore will not misinterpret them. (Also, the outer eth_type |
| 146 | is still 0x8100, not changed to 0x0800.) |
| 147 | |
| 148 | Handling malformed packets |
| 149 | -------------------------- |
| 150 | |
| 151 | Don't drop packets in the kernel for malformed protocol headers, bad |
| 152 | checksums, etc. This would prevent userspace from implementing a |
| 153 | simple Ethernet switch that forwards every packet. |
| 154 | |
| 155 | Instead, in such a case, include an attribute with "empty" content. |
| 156 | It doesn't matter if the empty content could be valid protocol values, |
| 157 | as long as those values are rarely seen in practice, because userspace |
| 158 | can always forward all packets with those values to userspace and |
| 159 | handle them individually. |
| 160 | |
| 161 | For example, consider a packet that contains an IP header that |
| 162 | indicates protocol 6 for TCP, but which is truncated just after the IP |
| 163 | header, so that the TCP header is missing. The flow key for this |
| 164 | packet would include a tcp attribute with all-zero src and dst, like |
| 165 | this: |
| 166 | |
| 167 | eth(...), eth_type(0x0800), ip(proto=6, ...), tcp(src=0, dst=0) |
| 168 | |
| 169 | As another example, consider a packet with an Ethernet type of 0x8100, |
| 170 | indicating that a VLAN TCI should follow, but which is truncated just |
| 171 | after the Ethernet type. The flow key for this packet would include |
| 172 | an all-zero-bits vlan and an empty encap attribute, like this: |
| 173 | |
| 174 | eth(...), eth_type(0x8100), vlan(0), encap() |
| 175 | |
| 176 | Unlike a TCP packet with source and destination ports 0, an |
| 177 | all-zero-bits VLAN TCI is not that rare, so the CFI bit (aka |
| 178 | VLAN_TAG_PRESENT inside the kernel) is ordinarily set in a vlan |
| 179 | attribute expressly to allow this situation to be distinguished. |
| 180 | Thus, the flow key in this second example unambiguously indicates a |
| 181 | missing or malformed VLAN TCI. |
| 182 | |
| 183 | Other rules |
| 184 | ----------- |
| 185 | |
| 186 | The other rules for flow keys are much less subtle: |
| 187 | |
| 188 | - Duplicate attributes are not allowed at a given nesting level. |
| 189 | |
| 190 | - Ordering of attributes is not significant. |
| 191 | |
| 192 | - When the kernel sends a given flow key to userspace, it always |
| 193 | composes it the same way. This allows userspace to hash and |
| 194 | compare entire flow keys that it may not be able to fully |
| 195 | interpret. |