Evgeniy Polyakov | 81f6075 | 2006-03-23 19:11:58 +0300 | [diff] [blame] | 1 | Kernel driver ds2490 |
| 2 | ==================== |
| 3 | |
| 4 | Supported chips: |
| 5 | * Maxim DS2490 based |
| 6 | |
| 7 | Author: Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru> |
| 8 | |
| 9 | |
| 10 | Description |
| 11 | ----------- |
| 12 | |
Rob Landley | 2216886 | 2007-10-16 23:31:25 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 13 | The Maxim/Dallas Semiconductor DS2490 is a chip |
Evgeniy Polyakov | 81f6075 | 2006-03-23 19:11:58 +0300 | [diff] [blame] | 14 | which allows to build USB <-> W1 bridges. |
| 15 | |
| 16 | DS9490(R) is a USB <-> W1 bus master device |
| 17 | which has 0x81 family ID integrated chip and DS2490 |
| 18 | low-level operational chip. |
David Fries | 3823ee4 | 2008-10-15 22:05:09 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 19 | |
| 20 | Notes and limitations. |
| 21 | - The weak pullup current is a minimum of 0.9mA and maximum of 6.0mA. |
| 22 | - The 5V strong pullup is supported with a minimum of 5.9mA and a |
| 23 | maximum of 30.4 mA. (From DS2490.pdf) |
David Fries | 3823ee4 | 2008-10-15 22:05:09 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 24 | - The hardware will detect when devices are attached to the bus on the |
| 25 | next bus (reset?) operation, however only a message is printed as |
| 26 | the core w1 code doesn't make use of the information. Connecting |
| 27 | one device tends to give multiple new device notifications. |
| 28 | - The number of USB bus transactions could be reduced if w1_reset_send |
| 29 | was added to the API. The name is just a suggestion. It would take |
| 30 | a write buffer and a read buffer (along with sizes) as arguments. |
| 31 | The ds2490 block I/O command supports reset, write buffer, read |
| 32 | buffer, and strong pullup all in one command, instead of the current |
| 33 | 1 reset bus, 2 write the match rom command and slave rom id, 3 block |
| 34 | write and read data. The write buffer needs to have the match rom |
| 35 | command and slave rom id prepended to the front of the requested |
| 36 | write buffer, both of which are known to the driver. |
| 37 | - The hardware supports normal, flexible, and overdrive bus |
| 38 | communication speeds, but only the normal is supported. |
| 39 | - The registered w1_bus_master functions don't define error |
| 40 | conditions. If a bus search is in progress and the ds2490 is |
| 41 | removed it can produce a good amount of error output before the bus |
| 42 | search finishes. |
| 43 | - The hardware supports detecting some error conditions, such as |
| 44 | short, alarming presence on reset, and no presence on reset, but the |
| 45 | driver doesn't query those values. |
| 46 | - The ds2490 specification doesn't cover short bulk in reads in |
| 47 | detail, but my observation is if fewer bytes are requested than are |
| 48 | available, the bulk read will return an error and the hardware will |
| 49 | clear the entire bulk in buffer. It would be possible to read the |
| 50 | maximum buffer size to not run into this error condition, only extra |
| 51 | bytes in the buffer is a logic error in the driver. The code should |
| 52 | should match reads and writes as well as data sizes. Reads and |
| 53 | writes are serialized and the status verifies that the chip is idle |
| 54 | (and data is available) before the read is executed, so it should |
| 55 | not happen. |
| 56 | - Running x86_64 2.6.24 UHCI under qemu 0.9.0 under x86_64 2.6.22-rc6 |
| 57 | with a OHCI controller, ds2490 running in the guest would operate |
| 58 | normally the first time the module was loaded after qemu attached |
| 59 | the ds2490 hardware, but if the module was unloaded, then reloaded |
| 60 | most of the time one of the bulk out or in, and usually the bulk in |
| 61 | would fail. qemu sets a 50ms timeout and the bulk in would timeout |
| 62 | even when the status shows data available. A bulk out write would |
| 63 | show a successful completion, but the ds2490 status register would |
| 64 | show 0 bytes written. Detaching qemu from the ds2490 hardware and |
| 65 | reattaching would clear the problem. usbmon output in the guest and |
| 66 | host did not explain the problem. My guess is a bug in either qemu |
| 67 | or the host OS and more likely the host OS. |
| 68 | -- 03-06-2008 David Fries <David@Fries.net> |