blob: 7b2d11e53a49f14c09190449172d539c4725e503 [file] [log] [blame]
Andrea Gelmini89140f42010-06-03 11:33:50 +02001The I2C protocol knows about two kinds of device addresses: normal 7 bit
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07002addresses, and an extended set of 10 bit addresses. The sets of addresses
3do not intersect: the 7 bit address 0x10 is not the same as the 10 bit
Jean Delvarecbb44512011-11-23 11:33:07 +01004address 0x10 (though a single device could respond to both of them).
Wolfram Sangcfa03272015-07-27 14:03:38 +02005To avoid ambiguity, the user sees 10 bit addresses mapped to a different
6address space, namely 0xa000-0xa3ff. The leading 0xa (= 10) represents the
710 bit mode. This is used for creating device names in sysfs. It is also
8needed when instantiating 10 bit devices via the new_device file in sysfs.
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07009
Jean Delvarecbb44512011-11-23 11:33:07 +010010I2C messages to and from 10-bit address devices have a different format.
11See the I2C specification for the details.
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -070012
Jean Delvarecbb44512011-11-23 11:33:07 +010013The current 10 bit address support is minimal. It should work, however
14you can expect some problems along the way:
15* Not all bus drivers support 10-bit addresses. Some don't because the
16 hardware doesn't support them (SMBus doesn't require 10-bit address
17 support for example), some don't because nobody bothered adding the
18 code (or it's there but not working properly.) Software implementation
19 (i2c-algo-bit) is known to work.
20* Some optional features do not support 10-bit addresses. This is the
21 case of automatic detection and instantiation of devices by their,
22 drivers, for example.
23* Many user-space packages (for example i2c-tools) lack support for
24 10-bit addresses.
25
26Note that 10-bit address devices are still pretty rare, so the limitations
27listed above could stay for a long time, maybe even forever if nobody
28needs them to be fixed.