blob: 9b95cf80b4075386af2d35b81aa7300333a69a2a [file] [log] [blame]
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07001/*
Uwe Zeisbergerf30c2262006-10-03 23:01:26 +02002 * mm/page-writeback.c
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07003 *
4 * Copyright (C) 2002, Linus Torvalds.
Peter Zijlstra04fbfdc2007-10-16 23:25:50 -07005 * Copyright (C) 2007 Red Hat, Inc., Peter Zijlstra <pzijlstr@redhat.com>
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07006 *
7 * Contains functions related to writing back dirty pages at the
8 * address_space level.
9 *
Francois Camie1f8e872008-10-15 22:01:59 -070010 * 10Apr2002 Andrew Morton
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -070011 * Initial version
12 */
13
14#include <linux/kernel.h>
Paul Gortmakerb95f1b312011-10-16 02:01:52 -040015#include <linux/export.h>
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -070016#include <linux/spinlock.h>
17#include <linux/fs.h>
18#include <linux/mm.h>
19#include <linux/swap.h>
20#include <linux/slab.h>
21#include <linux/pagemap.h>
22#include <linux/writeback.h>
23#include <linux/init.h>
24#include <linux/backing-dev.h>
Andrew Morton55e829a2006-12-10 02:19:27 -080025#include <linux/task_io_accounting_ops.h>
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -070026#include <linux/blkdev.h>
27#include <linux/mpage.h>
Peter Zijlstrad08b3852006-09-25 23:30:57 -070028#include <linux/rmap.h>
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -070029#include <linux/percpu.h>
30#include <linux/notifier.h>
31#include <linux/smp.h>
32#include <linux/sysctl.h>
33#include <linux/cpu.h>
34#include <linux/syscalls.h>
Al Viroff01bb482011-09-16 02:31:11 -040035#include <linux/buffer_head.h> /* __set_page_dirty_buffers */
David Howells811d7362006-08-29 19:06:09 +010036#include <linux/pagevec.h>
Jan Karaeb608e32012-05-24 18:59:11 +020037#include <linux/timer.h>
Clark Williams8bd75c72013-02-07 09:47:07 -060038#include <linux/sched/rt.h>
Lisa Du6e543d52013-09-11 14:22:36 -070039#include <linux/mm_inline.h>
Dave Chinner028c2dd2010-07-07 13:24:07 +100040#include <trace/events/writeback.h>
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -070041
Lisa Du6e543d52013-09-11 14:22:36 -070042#include "internal.h"
43
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -070044/*
Wu Fengguangffd1f602011-06-19 22:18:42 -060045 * Sleep at most 200ms at a time in balance_dirty_pages().
46 */
47#define MAX_PAUSE max(HZ/5, 1)
48
49/*
Wu Fengguang5b9b3572011-12-06 13:17:17 -060050 * Try to keep balance_dirty_pages() call intervals higher than this many pages
51 * by raising pause time to max_pause when falls below it.
52 */
53#define DIRTY_POLL_THRESH (128 >> (PAGE_SHIFT - 10))
54
55/*
Wu Fengguange98be2d2010-08-29 11:22:30 -060056 * Estimate write bandwidth at 200ms intervals.
57 */
58#define BANDWIDTH_INTERVAL max(HZ/5, 1)
59
Wu Fengguang6c14ae12011-03-02 16:04:18 -060060#define RATELIMIT_CALC_SHIFT 10
61
Wu Fengguange98be2d2010-08-29 11:22:30 -060062/*
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -070063 * After a CPU has dirtied this many pages, balance_dirty_pages_ratelimited
64 * will look to see if it needs to force writeback or throttling.
65 */
66static long ratelimit_pages = 32;
67
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -070068/* The following parameters are exported via /proc/sys/vm */
69
70/*
Jens Axboe5b0830c2009-09-23 19:37:09 +020071 * Start background writeback (via writeback threads) at this percentage
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -070072 */
Wu Fengguang1b5e62b2009-03-23 08:57:38 +080073int dirty_background_ratio = 10;
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -070074
75/*
David Rientjes2da02992009-01-06 14:39:31 -080076 * dirty_background_bytes starts at 0 (disabled) so that it is a function of
77 * dirty_background_ratio * the amount of dirtyable memory
78 */
79unsigned long dirty_background_bytes;
80
81/*
Bron Gondwana195cf4532008-02-04 22:29:20 -080082 * free highmem will not be subtracted from the total free memory
83 * for calculating free ratios if vm_highmem_is_dirtyable is true
84 */
85int vm_highmem_is_dirtyable;
86
87/*
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -070088 * The generator of dirty data starts writeback at this percentage
89 */
Wu Fengguang1b5e62b2009-03-23 08:57:38 +080090int vm_dirty_ratio = 20;
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -070091
92/*
David Rientjes2da02992009-01-06 14:39:31 -080093 * vm_dirty_bytes starts at 0 (disabled) so that it is a function of
94 * vm_dirty_ratio * the amount of dirtyable memory
95 */
96unsigned long vm_dirty_bytes;
97
98/*
Alexey Dobriyan704503d2009-03-31 15:23:18 -070099 * The interval between `kupdate'-style writebacks
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700100 */
Toshiyuki Okajima22ef37e2009-05-16 22:56:28 -0700101unsigned int dirty_writeback_interval = 5 * 100; /* centiseconds */
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700102
Artem Bityutskiy91913a22012-03-21 22:33:00 -0400103EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dirty_writeback_interval);
104
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700105/*
Alexey Dobriyan704503d2009-03-31 15:23:18 -0700106 * The longest time for which data is allowed to remain dirty
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700107 */
Toshiyuki Okajima22ef37e2009-05-16 22:56:28 -0700108unsigned int dirty_expire_interval = 30 * 100; /* centiseconds */
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700109
110/*
111 * Flag that makes the machine dump writes/reads and block dirtyings.
112 */
113int block_dump;
114
115/*
Bart Samweled5b43f2006-03-24 03:15:49 -0800116 * Flag that puts the machine in "laptop mode". Doubles as a timeout in jiffies:
117 * a full sync is triggered after this time elapses without any disk activity.
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700118 */
119int laptop_mode;
120
121EXPORT_SYMBOL(laptop_mode);
122
123/* End of sysctl-exported parameters */
124
Wu Fengguangc42843f2011-03-02 15:54:09 -0600125unsigned long global_dirty_limit;
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700126
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700127/*
Peter Zijlstra04fbfdc2007-10-16 23:25:50 -0700128 * Scale the writeback cache size proportional to the relative writeout speeds.
129 *
130 * We do this by keeping a floating proportion between BDIs, based on page
131 * writeback completions [end_page_writeback()]. Those devices that write out
132 * pages fastest will get the larger share, while the slower will get a smaller
133 * share.
134 *
135 * We use page writeout completions because we are interested in getting rid of
136 * dirty pages. Having them written out is the primary goal.
137 *
138 * We introduce a concept of time, a period over which we measure these events,
139 * because demand can/will vary over time. The length of this period itself is
140 * measured in page writeback completions.
141 *
142 */
Jan Karaeb608e32012-05-24 18:59:11 +0200143static struct fprop_global writeout_completions;
144
145static void writeout_period(unsigned long t);
146/* Timer for aging of writeout_completions */
147static struct timer_list writeout_period_timer =
148 TIMER_DEFERRED_INITIALIZER(writeout_period, 0, 0);
149static unsigned long writeout_period_time = 0;
150
151/*
152 * Length of period for aging writeout fractions of bdis. This is an
153 * arbitrarily chosen number. The longer the period, the slower fractions will
154 * reflect changes in current writeout rate.
155 */
156#define VM_COMPLETIONS_PERIOD_LEN (3*HZ)
Peter Zijlstra04fbfdc2007-10-16 23:25:50 -0700157
Peter Zijlstra04fbfdc2007-10-16 23:25:50 -0700158/*
Johannes Weinera756cf52012-01-10 15:07:49 -0800159 * In a memory zone, there is a certain amount of pages we consider
160 * available for the page cache, which is essentially the number of
161 * free and reclaimable pages, minus some zone reserves to protect
162 * lowmem and the ability to uphold the zone's watermarks without
163 * requiring writeback.
164 *
165 * This number of dirtyable pages is the base value of which the
166 * user-configurable dirty ratio is the effictive number of pages that
167 * are allowed to be actually dirtied. Per individual zone, or
168 * globally by using the sum of dirtyable pages over all zones.
169 *
170 * Because the user is allowed to specify the dirty limit globally as
171 * absolute number of bytes, calculating the per-zone dirty limit can
172 * require translating the configured limit into a percentage of
173 * global dirtyable memory first.
174 */
175
Johannes Weinera8045522014-01-29 14:05:39 -0800176/**
177 * zone_dirtyable_memory - number of dirtyable pages in a zone
178 * @zone: the zone
179 *
180 * Returns the zone's number of pages potentially available for dirty
181 * page cache. This is the base value for the per-zone dirty limits.
182 */
183static unsigned long zone_dirtyable_memory(struct zone *zone)
184{
185 unsigned long nr_pages;
186
187 nr_pages = zone_page_state(zone, NR_FREE_PAGES);
188 nr_pages -= min(nr_pages, zone->dirty_balance_reserve);
189
Johannes Weinera1c3bfb2014-01-29 14:05:41 -0800190 nr_pages += zone_page_state(zone, NR_INACTIVE_FILE);
191 nr_pages += zone_page_state(zone, NR_ACTIVE_FILE);
Johannes Weinera8045522014-01-29 14:05:39 -0800192
193 return nr_pages;
194}
195
Johannes Weiner1edf2232012-01-10 15:06:57 -0800196static unsigned long highmem_dirtyable_memory(unsigned long total)
197{
198#ifdef CONFIG_HIGHMEM
199 int node;
200 unsigned long x = 0;
201
202 for_each_node_state(node, N_HIGH_MEMORY) {
Johannes Weinera8045522014-01-29 14:05:39 -0800203 struct zone *z = &NODE_DATA(node)->node_zones[ZONE_HIGHMEM];
Johannes Weiner1edf2232012-01-10 15:06:57 -0800204
Johannes Weinera8045522014-01-29 14:05:39 -0800205 x += zone_dirtyable_memory(z);
Johannes Weiner1edf2232012-01-10 15:06:57 -0800206 }
207 /*
Sonny Raoc8b74c2f2012-12-20 15:05:07 -0800208 * Unreclaimable memory (kernel memory or anonymous memory
209 * without swap) can bring down the dirtyable pages below
210 * the zone's dirty balance reserve and the above calculation
211 * will underflow. However we still want to add in nodes
212 * which are below threshold (negative values) to get a more
213 * accurate calculation but make sure that the total never
214 * underflows.
215 */
216 if ((long)x < 0)
217 x = 0;
218
219 /*
Johannes Weiner1edf2232012-01-10 15:06:57 -0800220 * Make sure that the number of highmem pages is never larger
221 * than the number of the total dirtyable memory. This can only
222 * occur in very strange VM situations but we want to make sure
223 * that this does not occur.
224 */
225 return min(x, total);
226#else
227 return 0;
228#endif
229}
230
231/**
Johannes Weinerccafa282012-01-10 15:07:44 -0800232 * global_dirtyable_memory - number of globally dirtyable pages
Johannes Weiner1edf2232012-01-10 15:06:57 -0800233 *
Johannes Weinerccafa282012-01-10 15:07:44 -0800234 * Returns the global number of pages potentially available for dirty
235 * page cache. This is the base value for the global dirty limits.
Johannes Weiner1edf2232012-01-10 15:06:57 -0800236 */
H Hartley Sweeten18cf8cf2012-04-12 13:44:20 -0700237static unsigned long global_dirtyable_memory(void)
Johannes Weiner1edf2232012-01-10 15:06:57 -0800238{
239 unsigned long x;
240
Johannes Weinera8045522014-01-29 14:05:39 -0800241 x = global_page_state(NR_FREE_PAGES);
Sonny Raoc8b74c2f2012-12-20 15:05:07 -0800242 x -= min(x, dirty_balance_reserve);
Johannes Weiner1edf2232012-01-10 15:06:57 -0800243
Johannes Weinera1c3bfb2014-01-29 14:05:41 -0800244 x += global_page_state(NR_INACTIVE_FILE);
245 x += global_page_state(NR_ACTIVE_FILE);
Johannes Weinera8045522014-01-29 14:05:39 -0800246
Johannes Weiner1edf2232012-01-10 15:06:57 -0800247 if (!vm_highmem_is_dirtyable)
248 x -= highmem_dirtyable_memory(x);
249
250 return x + 1; /* Ensure that we never return 0 */
251}
252
253/*
Johannes Weinerccafa282012-01-10 15:07:44 -0800254 * global_dirty_limits - background-writeback and dirty-throttling thresholds
255 *
256 * Calculate the dirty thresholds based on sysctl parameters
257 * - vm.dirty_background_ratio or vm.dirty_background_bytes
258 * - vm.dirty_ratio or vm.dirty_bytes
259 * The dirty limits will be lifted by 1/4 for PF_LESS_THROTTLE (ie. nfsd) and
260 * real-time tasks.
261 */
262void global_dirty_limits(unsigned long *pbackground, unsigned long *pdirty)
263{
David Rientjes9ef0a0f2014-08-06 16:07:31 -0700264 const unsigned long available_memory = global_dirtyable_memory();
Johannes Weinerccafa282012-01-10 15:07:44 -0800265 unsigned long background;
266 unsigned long dirty;
Johannes Weinerccafa282012-01-10 15:07:44 -0800267 struct task_struct *tsk;
268
Johannes Weinerccafa282012-01-10 15:07:44 -0800269 if (vm_dirty_bytes)
270 dirty = DIV_ROUND_UP(vm_dirty_bytes, PAGE_SIZE);
271 else
272 dirty = (vm_dirty_ratio * available_memory) / 100;
273
274 if (dirty_background_bytes)
275 background = DIV_ROUND_UP(dirty_background_bytes, PAGE_SIZE);
276 else
277 background = (dirty_background_ratio * available_memory) / 100;
278
279 if (background >= dirty)
280 background = dirty / 2;
281 tsk = current;
282 if (tsk->flags & PF_LESS_THROTTLE || rt_task(tsk)) {
283 background += background / 4;
284 dirty += dirty / 4;
285 }
286 *pbackground = background;
287 *pdirty = dirty;
288 trace_global_dirty_state(background, dirty);
289}
290
Johannes Weinera756cf52012-01-10 15:07:49 -0800291/**
Johannes Weinera756cf52012-01-10 15:07:49 -0800292 * zone_dirty_limit - maximum number of dirty pages allowed in a zone
293 * @zone: the zone
294 *
295 * Returns the maximum number of dirty pages allowed in a zone, based
296 * on the zone's dirtyable memory.
297 */
298static unsigned long zone_dirty_limit(struct zone *zone)
299{
300 unsigned long zone_memory = zone_dirtyable_memory(zone);
301 struct task_struct *tsk = current;
302 unsigned long dirty;
303
304 if (vm_dirty_bytes)
305 dirty = DIV_ROUND_UP(vm_dirty_bytes, PAGE_SIZE) *
306 zone_memory / global_dirtyable_memory();
307 else
308 dirty = vm_dirty_ratio * zone_memory / 100;
309
310 if (tsk->flags & PF_LESS_THROTTLE || rt_task(tsk))
311 dirty += dirty / 4;
312
313 return dirty;
314}
315
316/**
317 * zone_dirty_ok - tells whether a zone is within its dirty limits
318 * @zone: the zone to check
319 *
320 * Returns %true when the dirty pages in @zone are within the zone's
321 * dirty limit, %false if the limit is exceeded.
322 */
323bool zone_dirty_ok(struct zone *zone)
324{
325 unsigned long limit = zone_dirty_limit(zone);
326
327 return zone_page_state(zone, NR_FILE_DIRTY) +
328 zone_page_state(zone, NR_UNSTABLE_NFS) +
329 zone_page_state(zone, NR_WRITEBACK) <= limit;
330}
331
David Rientjes2da02992009-01-06 14:39:31 -0800332int dirty_background_ratio_handler(struct ctl_table *table, int write,
Alexey Dobriyan8d65af72009-09-23 15:57:19 -0700333 void __user *buffer, size_t *lenp,
David Rientjes2da02992009-01-06 14:39:31 -0800334 loff_t *ppos)
335{
336 int ret;
337
Alexey Dobriyan8d65af72009-09-23 15:57:19 -0700338 ret = proc_dointvec_minmax(table, write, buffer, lenp, ppos);
David Rientjes2da02992009-01-06 14:39:31 -0800339 if (ret == 0 && write)
340 dirty_background_bytes = 0;
341 return ret;
342}
343
344int dirty_background_bytes_handler(struct ctl_table *table, int write,
Alexey Dobriyan8d65af72009-09-23 15:57:19 -0700345 void __user *buffer, size_t *lenp,
David Rientjes2da02992009-01-06 14:39:31 -0800346 loff_t *ppos)
347{
348 int ret;
349
Alexey Dobriyan8d65af72009-09-23 15:57:19 -0700350 ret = proc_doulongvec_minmax(table, write, buffer, lenp, ppos);
David Rientjes2da02992009-01-06 14:39:31 -0800351 if (ret == 0 && write)
352 dirty_background_ratio = 0;
353 return ret;
354}
355
Peter Zijlstra04fbfdc2007-10-16 23:25:50 -0700356int dirty_ratio_handler(struct ctl_table *table, int write,
Alexey Dobriyan8d65af72009-09-23 15:57:19 -0700357 void __user *buffer, size_t *lenp,
Peter Zijlstra04fbfdc2007-10-16 23:25:50 -0700358 loff_t *ppos)
359{
360 int old_ratio = vm_dirty_ratio;
David Rientjes2da02992009-01-06 14:39:31 -0800361 int ret;
362
Alexey Dobriyan8d65af72009-09-23 15:57:19 -0700363 ret = proc_dointvec_minmax(table, write, buffer, lenp, ppos);
Peter Zijlstra04fbfdc2007-10-16 23:25:50 -0700364 if (ret == 0 && write && vm_dirty_ratio != old_ratio) {
Jan Karaeb608e32012-05-24 18:59:11 +0200365 writeback_set_ratelimit();
David Rientjes2da02992009-01-06 14:39:31 -0800366 vm_dirty_bytes = 0;
367 }
368 return ret;
369}
370
David Rientjes2da02992009-01-06 14:39:31 -0800371int dirty_bytes_handler(struct ctl_table *table, int write,
Alexey Dobriyan8d65af72009-09-23 15:57:19 -0700372 void __user *buffer, size_t *lenp,
David Rientjes2da02992009-01-06 14:39:31 -0800373 loff_t *ppos)
374{
Sven Wegenerfc3501d2009-02-11 13:04:23 -0800375 unsigned long old_bytes = vm_dirty_bytes;
David Rientjes2da02992009-01-06 14:39:31 -0800376 int ret;
377
Alexey Dobriyan8d65af72009-09-23 15:57:19 -0700378 ret = proc_doulongvec_minmax(table, write, buffer, lenp, ppos);
David Rientjes2da02992009-01-06 14:39:31 -0800379 if (ret == 0 && write && vm_dirty_bytes != old_bytes) {
Jan Karaeb608e32012-05-24 18:59:11 +0200380 writeback_set_ratelimit();
David Rientjes2da02992009-01-06 14:39:31 -0800381 vm_dirty_ratio = 0;
Peter Zijlstra04fbfdc2007-10-16 23:25:50 -0700382 }
383 return ret;
384}
385
Jan Karaeb608e32012-05-24 18:59:11 +0200386static unsigned long wp_next_time(unsigned long cur_time)
387{
388 cur_time += VM_COMPLETIONS_PERIOD_LEN;
389 /* 0 has a special meaning... */
390 if (!cur_time)
391 return 1;
392 return cur_time;
393}
394
Peter Zijlstra04fbfdc2007-10-16 23:25:50 -0700395/*
396 * Increment the BDI's writeout completion count and the global writeout
397 * completion count. Called from test_clear_page_writeback().
398 */
Tejun Heo93f78d82015-05-22 17:13:27 -0400399static inline void __wb_writeout_inc(struct bdi_writeback *wb)
Peter Zijlstra04fbfdc2007-10-16 23:25:50 -0700400{
Tejun Heo93f78d82015-05-22 17:13:27 -0400401 __inc_wb_stat(wb, WB_WRITTEN);
Tejun Heoa88a3412015-05-22 17:13:28 -0400402 __fprop_inc_percpu_max(&writeout_completions, &wb->completions,
Tejun Heo93f78d82015-05-22 17:13:27 -0400403 wb->bdi->max_prop_frac);
Jan Karaeb608e32012-05-24 18:59:11 +0200404 /* First event after period switching was turned off? */
405 if (!unlikely(writeout_period_time)) {
406 /*
407 * We can race with other __bdi_writeout_inc calls here but
408 * it does not cause any harm since the resulting time when
409 * timer will fire and what is in writeout_period_time will be
410 * roughly the same.
411 */
412 writeout_period_time = wp_next_time(jiffies);
413 mod_timer(&writeout_period_timer, writeout_period_time);
414 }
Peter Zijlstra04fbfdc2007-10-16 23:25:50 -0700415}
416
Tejun Heo93f78d82015-05-22 17:13:27 -0400417void wb_writeout_inc(struct bdi_writeback *wb)
Miklos Szeredidd5656e2008-04-30 00:54:37 -0700418{
419 unsigned long flags;
420
421 local_irq_save(flags);
Tejun Heo93f78d82015-05-22 17:13:27 -0400422 __wb_writeout_inc(wb);
Miklos Szeredidd5656e2008-04-30 00:54:37 -0700423 local_irq_restore(flags);
424}
Tejun Heo93f78d82015-05-22 17:13:27 -0400425EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(wb_writeout_inc);
Miklos Szeredidd5656e2008-04-30 00:54:37 -0700426
Peter Zijlstra04fbfdc2007-10-16 23:25:50 -0700427/*
428 * Obtain an accurate fraction of the BDI's portion.
429 */
Tejun Heoa88a3412015-05-22 17:13:28 -0400430static void wb_writeout_fraction(struct bdi_writeback *wb,
431 long *numerator, long *denominator)
Peter Zijlstra04fbfdc2007-10-16 23:25:50 -0700432{
Tejun Heoa88a3412015-05-22 17:13:28 -0400433 fprop_fraction_percpu(&writeout_completions, &wb->completions,
Peter Zijlstra04fbfdc2007-10-16 23:25:50 -0700434 numerator, denominator);
Peter Zijlstra04fbfdc2007-10-16 23:25:50 -0700435}
436
Peter Zijlstra04fbfdc2007-10-16 23:25:50 -0700437/*
Jan Karaeb608e32012-05-24 18:59:11 +0200438 * On idle system, we can be called long after we scheduled because we use
439 * deferred timers so count with missed periods.
440 */
441static void writeout_period(unsigned long t)
442{
443 int miss_periods = (jiffies - writeout_period_time) /
444 VM_COMPLETIONS_PERIOD_LEN;
445
446 if (fprop_new_period(&writeout_completions, miss_periods + 1)) {
447 writeout_period_time = wp_next_time(writeout_period_time +
448 miss_periods * VM_COMPLETIONS_PERIOD_LEN);
449 mod_timer(&writeout_period_timer, writeout_period_time);
450 } else {
451 /*
452 * Aging has zeroed all fractions. Stop wasting CPU on period
453 * updates.
454 */
455 writeout_period_time = 0;
456 }
457}
458
459/*
Johannes Weinerd08c4292011-10-31 17:07:05 -0700460 * bdi_min_ratio keeps the sum of the minimum dirty shares of all
461 * registered backing devices, which, for obvious reasons, can not
462 * exceed 100%.
Peter Zijlstra189d3c42008-04-30 00:54:35 -0700463 */
Peter Zijlstra189d3c42008-04-30 00:54:35 -0700464static unsigned int bdi_min_ratio;
465
466int bdi_set_min_ratio(struct backing_dev_info *bdi, unsigned int min_ratio)
467{
468 int ret = 0;
Peter Zijlstra189d3c42008-04-30 00:54:35 -0700469
Jens Axboecfc4ba52009-09-14 13:12:40 +0200470 spin_lock_bh(&bdi_lock);
Peter Zijlstraa42dde02008-04-30 00:54:36 -0700471 if (min_ratio > bdi->max_ratio) {
Peter Zijlstra189d3c42008-04-30 00:54:35 -0700472 ret = -EINVAL;
Peter Zijlstraa42dde02008-04-30 00:54:36 -0700473 } else {
474 min_ratio -= bdi->min_ratio;
475 if (bdi_min_ratio + min_ratio < 100) {
476 bdi_min_ratio += min_ratio;
477 bdi->min_ratio += min_ratio;
478 } else {
479 ret = -EINVAL;
480 }
481 }
Jens Axboecfc4ba52009-09-14 13:12:40 +0200482 spin_unlock_bh(&bdi_lock);
Peter Zijlstra189d3c42008-04-30 00:54:35 -0700483
484 return ret;
485}
486
Peter Zijlstraa42dde02008-04-30 00:54:36 -0700487int bdi_set_max_ratio(struct backing_dev_info *bdi, unsigned max_ratio)
488{
Peter Zijlstraa42dde02008-04-30 00:54:36 -0700489 int ret = 0;
490
491 if (max_ratio > 100)
492 return -EINVAL;
493
Jens Axboecfc4ba52009-09-14 13:12:40 +0200494 spin_lock_bh(&bdi_lock);
Peter Zijlstraa42dde02008-04-30 00:54:36 -0700495 if (bdi->min_ratio > max_ratio) {
496 ret = -EINVAL;
497 } else {
498 bdi->max_ratio = max_ratio;
Jan Karaeb608e32012-05-24 18:59:11 +0200499 bdi->max_prop_frac = (FPROP_FRAC_BASE * max_ratio) / 100;
Peter Zijlstraa42dde02008-04-30 00:54:36 -0700500 }
Jens Axboecfc4ba52009-09-14 13:12:40 +0200501 spin_unlock_bh(&bdi_lock);
Peter Zijlstraa42dde02008-04-30 00:54:36 -0700502
503 return ret;
504}
505EXPORT_SYMBOL(bdi_set_max_ratio);
506
Wu Fengguang6c14ae12011-03-02 16:04:18 -0600507static unsigned long dirty_freerun_ceiling(unsigned long thresh,
508 unsigned long bg_thresh)
509{
510 return (thresh + bg_thresh) / 2;
511}
512
Wu Fengguangffd1f602011-06-19 22:18:42 -0600513static unsigned long hard_dirty_limit(unsigned long thresh)
514{
515 return max(thresh, global_dirty_limit);
516}
517
Wu Fengguang6f718652011-03-02 17:14:34 -0600518/**
Tejun Heoa88a3412015-05-22 17:13:28 -0400519 * wb_dirty_limit - @wb's share of dirty throttling threshold
520 * @wb: bdi_writeback to query
Wu Fengguang6f718652011-03-02 17:14:34 -0600521 * @dirty: global dirty limit in pages
Wu Fengguang1babe182010-08-11 14:17:40 -0700522 *
Tejun Heoa88a3412015-05-22 17:13:28 -0400523 * Returns @wb's dirty limit in pages. The term "dirty" in the context of
Wu Fengguang6f718652011-03-02 17:14:34 -0600524 * dirty balancing includes all PG_dirty, PG_writeback and NFS unstable pages.
Wu Fengguangaed21ad2011-11-23 11:44:41 -0600525 *
526 * Note that balance_dirty_pages() will only seriously take it as a hard limit
527 * when sleeping max_pause per page is not enough to keep the dirty pages under
528 * control. For example, when the device is completely stalled due to some error
529 * conditions, or when there are 1000 dd tasks writing to a slow 10MB/s USB key.
530 * In the other normal situations, it acts more gently by throttling the tasks
Tejun Heoa88a3412015-05-22 17:13:28 -0400531 * more (rather than completely block them) when the wb dirty pages go high.
Wu Fengguang6f718652011-03-02 17:14:34 -0600532 *
533 * It allocates high/low dirty limits to fast/slow devices, in order to prevent
Wu Fengguang1babe182010-08-11 14:17:40 -0700534 * - starving fast devices
535 * - piling up dirty pages (that will take long time to sync) on slow devices
536 *
Tejun Heoa88a3412015-05-22 17:13:28 -0400537 * The wb's share of dirty limit will be adapting to its throughput and
Wu Fengguang1babe182010-08-11 14:17:40 -0700538 * bounded by the bdi->min_ratio and/or bdi->max_ratio parameters, if set.
539 */
Tejun Heoa88a3412015-05-22 17:13:28 -0400540unsigned long wb_dirty_limit(struct bdi_writeback *wb, unsigned long dirty)
Wu Fengguang16c40422010-08-11 14:17:39 -0700541{
Tejun Heoa88a3412015-05-22 17:13:28 -0400542 struct backing_dev_info *bdi = wb->bdi;
543 u64 wb_dirty;
Wu Fengguang16c40422010-08-11 14:17:39 -0700544 long numerator, denominator;
Peter Zijlstra04fbfdc2007-10-16 23:25:50 -0700545
Wu Fengguang16c40422010-08-11 14:17:39 -0700546 /*
547 * Calculate this BDI's share of the dirty ratio.
548 */
Tejun Heoa88a3412015-05-22 17:13:28 -0400549 wb_writeout_fraction(wb, &numerator, &denominator);
Peter Zijlstra04fbfdc2007-10-16 23:25:50 -0700550
Tejun Heoa88a3412015-05-22 17:13:28 -0400551 wb_dirty = (dirty * (100 - bdi_min_ratio)) / 100;
552 wb_dirty *= numerator;
553 do_div(wb_dirty, denominator);
Peter Zijlstra04fbfdc2007-10-16 23:25:50 -0700554
Tejun Heoa88a3412015-05-22 17:13:28 -0400555 wb_dirty += (dirty * bdi->min_ratio) / 100;
556 if (wb_dirty > (dirty * bdi->max_ratio) / 100)
557 wb_dirty = dirty * bdi->max_ratio / 100;
Wu Fengguang16c40422010-08-11 14:17:39 -0700558
Tejun Heoa88a3412015-05-22 17:13:28 -0400559 return wb_dirty;
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700560}
561
Wu Fengguang6c14ae12011-03-02 16:04:18 -0600562/*
Maxim Patlasov5a537482013-09-11 14:22:46 -0700563 * setpoint - dirty 3
564 * f(dirty) := 1.0 + (----------------)
565 * limit - setpoint
566 *
567 * it's a 3rd order polynomial that subjects to
568 *
569 * (1) f(freerun) = 2.0 => rampup dirty_ratelimit reasonably fast
570 * (2) f(setpoint) = 1.0 => the balance point
571 * (3) f(limit) = 0 => the hard limit
572 * (4) df/dx <= 0 => negative feedback control
573 * (5) the closer to setpoint, the smaller |df/dx| (and the reverse)
574 * => fast response on large errors; small oscillation near setpoint
575 */
Rik van Rield5c9fde2014-05-06 12:50:01 -0700576static long long pos_ratio_polynom(unsigned long setpoint,
Maxim Patlasov5a537482013-09-11 14:22:46 -0700577 unsigned long dirty,
578 unsigned long limit)
579{
580 long long pos_ratio;
581 long x;
582
Rik van Rield5c9fde2014-05-06 12:50:01 -0700583 x = div64_s64(((s64)setpoint - (s64)dirty) << RATELIMIT_CALC_SHIFT,
Maxim Patlasov5a537482013-09-11 14:22:46 -0700584 limit - setpoint + 1);
585 pos_ratio = x;
586 pos_ratio = pos_ratio * x >> RATELIMIT_CALC_SHIFT;
587 pos_ratio = pos_ratio * x >> RATELIMIT_CALC_SHIFT;
588 pos_ratio += 1 << RATELIMIT_CALC_SHIFT;
589
590 return clamp(pos_ratio, 0LL, 2LL << RATELIMIT_CALC_SHIFT);
591}
592
593/*
Wu Fengguang6c14ae12011-03-02 16:04:18 -0600594 * Dirty position control.
595 *
596 * (o) global/bdi setpoints
597 *
Tejun Heode1fff32015-05-22 17:13:29 -0400598 * We want the dirty pages be balanced around the global/wb setpoints.
Wu Fengguang6c14ae12011-03-02 16:04:18 -0600599 * When the number of dirty pages is higher/lower than the setpoint, the
600 * dirty position control ratio (and hence task dirty ratelimit) will be
601 * decreased/increased to bring the dirty pages back to the setpoint.
602 *
603 * pos_ratio = 1 << RATELIMIT_CALC_SHIFT
604 *
605 * if (dirty < setpoint) scale up pos_ratio
606 * if (dirty > setpoint) scale down pos_ratio
607 *
Tejun Heode1fff32015-05-22 17:13:29 -0400608 * if (wb_dirty < wb_setpoint) scale up pos_ratio
609 * if (wb_dirty > wb_setpoint) scale down pos_ratio
Wu Fengguang6c14ae12011-03-02 16:04:18 -0600610 *
611 * task_ratelimit = dirty_ratelimit * pos_ratio >> RATELIMIT_CALC_SHIFT
612 *
613 * (o) global control line
614 *
615 * ^ pos_ratio
616 * |
617 * | |<===== global dirty control scope ======>|
618 * 2.0 .............*
619 * | .*
620 * | . *
621 * | . *
622 * | . *
623 * | . *
624 * | . *
625 * 1.0 ................................*
626 * | . . *
627 * | . . *
628 * | . . *
629 * | . . *
630 * | . . *
631 * 0 +------------.------------------.----------------------*------------->
632 * freerun^ setpoint^ limit^ dirty pages
633 *
Tejun Heode1fff32015-05-22 17:13:29 -0400634 * (o) wb control line
Wu Fengguang6c14ae12011-03-02 16:04:18 -0600635 *
636 * ^ pos_ratio
637 * |
638 * | *
639 * | *
640 * | *
641 * | *
642 * | * |<=========== span ============>|
643 * 1.0 .......................*
644 * | . *
645 * | . *
646 * | . *
647 * | . *
648 * | . *
649 * | . *
650 * | . *
651 * | . *
652 * | . *
653 * | . *
654 * | . *
655 * 1/4 ...............................................* * * * * * * * * * * *
656 * | . .
657 * | . .
658 * | . .
659 * 0 +----------------------.-------------------------------.------------->
Tejun Heode1fff32015-05-22 17:13:29 -0400660 * wb_setpoint^ x_intercept^
Wu Fengguang6c14ae12011-03-02 16:04:18 -0600661 *
Tejun Heode1fff32015-05-22 17:13:29 -0400662 * The wb control line won't drop below pos_ratio=1/4, so that wb_dirty can
Wu Fengguang6c14ae12011-03-02 16:04:18 -0600663 * be smoothly throttled down to normal if it starts high in situations like
664 * - start writing to a slow SD card and a fast disk at the same time. The SD
Tejun Heode1fff32015-05-22 17:13:29 -0400665 * card's wb_dirty may rush to many times higher than wb_setpoint.
666 * - the wb dirty thresh drops quickly due to change of JBOD workload
Wu Fengguang6c14ae12011-03-02 16:04:18 -0600667 */
Tejun Heoa88a3412015-05-22 17:13:28 -0400668static unsigned long wb_position_ratio(struct bdi_writeback *wb,
669 unsigned long thresh,
670 unsigned long bg_thresh,
671 unsigned long dirty,
Tejun Heode1fff32015-05-22 17:13:29 -0400672 unsigned long wb_thresh,
673 unsigned long wb_dirty)
Wu Fengguang6c14ae12011-03-02 16:04:18 -0600674{
Tejun Heoa88a3412015-05-22 17:13:28 -0400675 unsigned long write_bw = wb->avg_write_bandwidth;
Wu Fengguang6c14ae12011-03-02 16:04:18 -0600676 unsigned long freerun = dirty_freerun_ceiling(thresh, bg_thresh);
677 unsigned long limit = hard_dirty_limit(thresh);
678 unsigned long x_intercept;
679 unsigned long setpoint; /* dirty pages' target balance point */
Tejun Heode1fff32015-05-22 17:13:29 -0400680 unsigned long wb_setpoint;
Wu Fengguang6c14ae12011-03-02 16:04:18 -0600681 unsigned long span;
682 long long pos_ratio; /* for scaling up/down the rate limit */
683 long x;
684
685 if (unlikely(dirty >= limit))
686 return 0;
687
688 /*
689 * global setpoint
690 *
Maxim Patlasov5a537482013-09-11 14:22:46 -0700691 * See comment for pos_ratio_polynom().
Wu Fengguang6c14ae12011-03-02 16:04:18 -0600692 */
693 setpoint = (freerun + limit) / 2;
Maxim Patlasov5a537482013-09-11 14:22:46 -0700694 pos_ratio = pos_ratio_polynom(setpoint, dirty, limit);
695
696 /*
697 * The strictlimit feature is a tool preventing mistrusted filesystems
698 * from growing a large number of dirty pages before throttling. For
Tejun Heode1fff32015-05-22 17:13:29 -0400699 * such filesystems balance_dirty_pages always checks wb counters
700 * against wb limits. Even if global "nr_dirty" is under "freerun".
Maxim Patlasov5a537482013-09-11 14:22:46 -0700701 * This is especially important for fuse which sets bdi->max_ratio to
702 * 1% by default. Without strictlimit feature, fuse writeback may
703 * consume arbitrary amount of RAM because it is accounted in
704 * NR_WRITEBACK_TEMP which is not involved in calculating "nr_dirty".
705 *
Tejun Heoa88a3412015-05-22 17:13:28 -0400706 * Here, in wb_position_ratio(), we calculate pos_ratio based on
Tejun Heode1fff32015-05-22 17:13:29 -0400707 * two values: wb_dirty and wb_thresh. Let's consider an example:
Maxim Patlasov5a537482013-09-11 14:22:46 -0700708 * total amount of RAM is 16GB, bdi->max_ratio is equal to 1%, global
709 * limits are set by default to 10% and 20% (background and throttle).
Tejun Heode1fff32015-05-22 17:13:29 -0400710 * Then wb_thresh is 1% of 20% of 16GB. This amounts to ~8K pages.
711 * wb_dirty_limit(wb, bg_thresh) is about ~4K pages. wb_setpoint is
712 * about ~6K pages (as the average of background and throttle wb
Maxim Patlasov5a537482013-09-11 14:22:46 -0700713 * limits). The 3rd order polynomial will provide positive feedback if
Tejun Heode1fff32015-05-22 17:13:29 -0400714 * wb_dirty is under wb_setpoint and vice versa.
Maxim Patlasov5a537482013-09-11 14:22:46 -0700715 *
716 * Note, that we cannot use global counters in these calculations
Tejun Heode1fff32015-05-22 17:13:29 -0400717 * because we want to throttle process writing to a strictlimit wb
Maxim Patlasov5a537482013-09-11 14:22:46 -0700718 * much earlier than global "freerun" is reached (~23MB vs. ~2.3GB
719 * in the example above).
720 */
Tejun Heoa88a3412015-05-22 17:13:28 -0400721 if (unlikely(wb->bdi->capabilities & BDI_CAP_STRICTLIMIT)) {
Tejun Heode1fff32015-05-22 17:13:29 -0400722 long long wb_pos_ratio;
723 unsigned long wb_bg_thresh;
Maxim Patlasov5a537482013-09-11 14:22:46 -0700724
Tejun Heode1fff32015-05-22 17:13:29 -0400725 if (wb_dirty < 8)
Maxim Patlasov5a537482013-09-11 14:22:46 -0700726 return min_t(long long, pos_ratio * 2,
727 2 << RATELIMIT_CALC_SHIFT);
728
Tejun Heode1fff32015-05-22 17:13:29 -0400729 if (wb_dirty >= wb_thresh)
Maxim Patlasov5a537482013-09-11 14:22:46 -0700730 return 0;
731
Tejun Heode1fff32015-05-22 17:13:29 -0400732 wb_bg_thresh = div_u64((u64)wb_thresh * bg_thresh, thresh);
733 wb_setpoint = dirty_freerun_ceiling(wb_thresh, wb_bg_thresh);
Maxim Patlasov5a537482013-09-11 14:22:46 -0700734
Tejun Heode1fff32015-05-22 17:13:29 -0400735 if (wb_setpoint == 0 || wb_setpoint == wb_thresh)
Maxim Patlasov5a537482013-09-11 14:22:46 -0700736 return 0;
737
Tejun Heode1fff32015-05-22 17:13:29 -0400738 wb_pos_ratio = pos_ratio_polynom(wb_setpoint, wb_dirty,
739 wb_thresh);
Maxim Patlasov5a537482013-09-11 14:22:46 -0700740
741 /*
Tejun Heode1fff32015-05-22 17:13:29 -0400742 * Typically, for strictlimit case, wb_setpoint << setpoint
743 * and pos_ratio >> wb_pos_ratio. In the other words global
Maxim Patlasov5a537482013-09-11 14:22:46 -0700744 * state ("dirty") is not limiting factor and we have to
Tejun Heode1fff32015-05-22 17:13:29 -0400745 * make decision based on wb counters. But there is an
Maxim Patlasov5a537482013-09-11 14:22:46 -0700746 * important case when global pos_ratio should get precedence:
747 * global limits are exceeded (e.g. due to activities on other
Tejun Heode1fff32015-05-22 17:13:29 -0400748 * wb's) while given strictlimit wb is below limit.
Maxim Patlasov5a537482013-09-11 14:22:46 -0700749 *
Tejun Heode1fff32015-05-22 17:13:29 -0400750 * "pos_ratio * wb_pos_ratio" would work for the case above,
Maxim Patlasov5a537482013-09-11 14:22:46 -0700751 * but it would look too non-natural for the case of all
Tejun Heode1fff32015-05-22 17:13:29 -0400752 * activity in the system coming from a single strictlimit wb
Maxim Patlasov5a537482013-09-11 14:22:46 -0700753 * with bdi->max_ratio == 100%.
754 *
755 * Note that min() below somewhat changes the dynamics of the
756 * control system. Normally, pos_ratio value can be well over 3
Tejun Heode1fff32015-05-22 17:13:29 -0400757 * (when globally we are at freerun and wb is well below wb
Maxim Patlasov5a537482013-09-11 14:22:46 -0700758 * setpoint). Now the maximum pos_ratio in the same situation
759 * is 2. We might want to tweak this if we observe the control
760 * system is too slow to adapt.
761 */
Tejun Heode1fff32015-05-22 17:13:29 -0400762 return min(pos_ratio, wb_pos_ratio);
Maxim Patlasov5a537482013-09-11 14:22:46 -0700763 }
Wu Fengguang6c14ae12011-03-02 16:04:18 -0600764
765 /*
766 * We have computed basic pos_ratio above based on global situation. If
Tejun Heode1fff32015-05-22 17:13:29 -0400767 * the wb is over/under its share of dirty pages, we want to scale
Wu Fengguang6c14ae12011-03-02 16:04:18 -0600768 * pos_ratio further down/up. That is done by the following mechanism.
769 */
770
771 /*
Tejun Heode1fff32015-05-22 17:13:29 -0400772 * wb setpoint
Wu Fengguang6c14ae12011-03-02 16:04:18 -0600773 *
Tejun Heode1fff32015-05-22 17:13:29 -0400774 * f(wb_dirty) := 1.0 + k * (wb_dirty - wb_setpoint)
Wu Fengguang6c14ae12011-03-02 16:04:18 -0600775 *
Tejun Heode1fff32015-05-22 17:13:29 -0400776 * x_intercept - wb_dirty
Wu Fengguang6c14ae12011-03-02 16:04:18 -0600777 * := --------------------------
Tejun Heode1fff32015-05-22 17:13:29 -0400778 * x_intercept - wb_setpoint
Wu Fengguang6c14ae12011-03-02 16:04:18 -0600779 *
Tejun Heode1fff32015-05-22 17:13:29 -0400780 * The main wb control line is a linear function that subjects to
Wu Fengguang6c14ae12011-03-02 16:04:18 -0600781 *
Tejun Heode1fff32015-05-22 17:13:29 -0400782 * (1) f(wb_setpoint) = 1.0
783 * (2) k = - 1 / (8 * write_bw) (in single wb case)
784 * or equally: x_intercept = wb_setpoint + 8 * write_bw
Wu Fengguang6c14ae12011-03-02 16:04:18 -0600785 *
Tejun Heode1fff32015-05-22 17:13:29 -0400786 * For single wb case, the dirty pages are observed to fluctuate
Wu Fengguang6c14ae12011-03-02 16:04:18 -0600787 * regularly within range
Tejun Heode1fff32015-05-22 17:13:29 -0400788 * [wb_setpoint - write_bw/2, wb_setpoint + write_bw/2]
Wu Fengguang6c14ae12011-03-02 16:04:18 -0600789 * for various filesystems, where (2) can yield in a reasonable 12.5%
790 * fluctuation range for pos_ratio.
791 *
Tejun Heode1fff32015-05-22 17:13:29 -0400792 * For JBOD case, wb_thresh (not wb_dirty!) could fluctuate up to its
Wu Fengguang6c14ae12011-03-02 16:04:18 -0600793 * own size, so move the slope over accordingly and choose a slope that
Tejun Heode1fff32015-05-22 17:13:29 -0400794 * yields 100% pos_ratio fluctuation on suddenly doubled wb_thresh.
Wu Fengguang6c14ae12011-03-02 16:04:18 -0600795 */
Tejun Heode1fff32015-05-22 17:13:29 -0400796 if (unlikely(wb_thresh > thresh))
797 wb_thresh = thresh;
Wu Fengguangaed21ad2011-11-23 11:44:41 -0600798 /*
Tejun Heode1fff32015-05-22 17:13:29 -0400799 * It's very possible that wb_thresh is close to 0 not because the
Wu Fengguangaed21ad2011-11-23 11:44:41 -0600800 * device is slow, but that it has remained inactive for long time.
801 * Honour such devices a reasonable good (hopefully IO efficient)
802 * threshold, so that the occasional writes won't be blocked and active
803 * writes can rampup the threshold quickly.
804 */
Tejun Heode1fff32015-05-22 17:13:29 -0400805 wb_thresh = max(wb_thresh, (limit - dirty) / 8);
Wu Fengguang6c14ae12011-03-02 16:04:18 -0600806 /*
Tejun Heode1fff32015-05-22 17:13:29 -0400807 * scale global setpoint to wb's:
808 * wb_setpoint = setpoint * wb_thresh / thresh
Wu Fengguang6c14ae12011-03-02 16:04:18 -0600809 */
Tejun Heode1fff32015-05-22 17:13:29 -0400810 x = div_u64((u64)wb_thresh << 16, thresh + 1);
811 wb_setpoint = setpoint * (u64)x >> 16;
Wu Fengguang6c14ae12011-03-02 16:04:18 -0600812 /*
Tejun Heode1fff32015-05-22 17:13:29 -0400813 * Use span=(8*write_bw) in single wb case as indicated by
814 * (thresh - wb_thresh ~= 0) and transit to wb_thresh in JBOD case.
Wu Fengguang6c14ae12011-03-02 16:04:18 -0600815 *
Tejun Heode1fff32015-05-22 17:13:29 -0400816 * wb_thresh thresh - wb_thresh
817 * span = --------- * (8 * write_bw) + ------------------ * wb_thresh
818 * thresh thresh
Wu Fengguang6c14ae12011-03-02 16:04:18 -0600819 */
Tejun Heode1fff32015-05-22 17:13:29 -0400820 span = (thresh - wb_thresh + 8 * write_bw) * (u64)x >> 16;
821 x_intercept = wb_setpoint + span;
Wu Fengguang6c14ae12011-03-02 16:04:18 -0600822
Tejun Heode1fff32015-05-22 17:13:29 -0400823 if (wb_dirty < x_intercept - span / 4) {
824 pos_ratio = div64_u64(pos_ratio * (x_intercept - wb_dirty),
825 x_intercept - wb_setpoint + 1);
Wu Fengguang6c14ae12011-03-02 16:04:18 -0600826 } else
827 pos_ratio /= 4;
828
Wu Fengguang8927f662011-08-04 22:16:46 -0600829 /*
Tejun Heode1fff32015-05-22 17:13:29 -0400830 * wb reserve area, safeguard against dirty pool underrun and disk idle
Wu Fengguang8927f662011-08-04 22:16:46 -0600831 * It may push the desired control point of global dirty pages higher
832 * than setpoint.
833 */
Tejun Heode1fff32015-05-22 17:13:29 -0400834 x_intercept = wb_thresh / 2;
835 if (wb_dirty < x_intercept) {
836 if (wb_dirty > x_intercept / 8)
837 pos_ratio = div_u64(pos_ratio * x_intercept, wb_dirty);
Wu Fengguang50657fc2011-10-11 17:06:33 -0600838 else
Wu Fengguang8927f662011-08-04 22:16:46 -0600839 pos_ratio *= 8;
840 }
841
Wu Fengguang6c14ae12011-03-02 16:04:18 -0600842 return pos_ratio;
843}
844
Tejun Heoa88a3412015-05-22 17:13:28 -0400845static void wb_update_write_bandwidth(struct bdi_writeback *wb,
846 unsigned long elapsed,
847 unsigned long written)
Wu Fengguange98be2d2010-08-29 11:22:30 -0600848{
849 const unsigned long period = roundup_pow_of_two(3 * HZ);
Tejun Heoa88a3412015-05-22 17:13:28 -0400850 unsigned long avg = wb->avg_write_bandwidth;
851 unsigned long old = wb->write_bandwidth;
Wu Fengguange98be2d2010-08-29 11:22:30 -0600852 u64 bw;
853
854 /*
855 * bw = written * HZ / elapsed
856 *
857 * bw * elapsed + write_bandwidth * (period - elapsed)
858 * write_bandwidth = ---------------------------------------------------
859 * period
Tejun Heoc72efb62015-03-23 00:18:48 -0400860 *
861 * @written may have decreased due to account_page_redirty().
862 * Avoid underflowing @bw calculation.
Wu Fengguange98be2d2010-08-29 11:22:30 -0600863 */
Tejun Heoa88a3412015-05-22 17:13:28 -0400864 bw = written - min(written, wb->written_stamp);
Wu Fengguange98be2d2010-08-29 11:22:30 -0600865 bw *= HZ;
866 if (unlikely(elapsed > period)) {
867 do_div(bw, elapsed);
868 avg = bw;
869 goto out;
870 }
Tejun Heoa88a3412015-05-22 17:13:28 -0400871 bw += (u64)wb->write_bandwidth * (period - elapsed);
Wu Fengguange98be2d2010-08-29 11:22:30 -0600872 bw >>= ilog2(period);
873
874 /*
875 * one more level of smoothing, for filtering out sudden spikes
876 */
877 if (avg > old && old >= (unsigned long)bw)
878 avg -= (avg - old) >> 3;
879
880 if (avg < old && old <= (unsigned long)bw)
881 avg += (old - avg) >> 3;
882
883out:
Tejun Heoa88a3412015-05-22 17:13:28 -0400884 wb->write_bandwidth = bw;
885 wb->avg_write_bandwidth = avg;
Wu Fengguange98be2d2010-08-29 11:22:30 -0600886}
887
Wu Fengguangc42843f2011-03-02 15:54:09 -0600888/*
889 * The global dirtyable memory and dirty threshold could be suddenly knocked
890 * down by a large amount (eg. on the startup of KVM in a swapless system).
891 * This may throw the system into deep dirty exceeded state and throttle
892 * heavy/light dirtiers alike. To retain good responsiveness, maintain
893 * global_dirty_limit for tracking slowly down to the knocked down dirty
894 * threshold.
895 */
896static void update_dirty_limit(unsigned long thresh, unsigned long dirty)
897{
898 unsigned long limit = global_dirty_limit;
899
900 /*
901 * Follow up in one step.
902 */
903 if (limit < thresh) {
904 limit = thresh;
905 goto update;
906 }
907
908 /*
909 * Follow down slowly. Use the higher one as the target, because thresh
910 * may drop below dirty. This is exactly the reason to introduce
911 * global_dirty_limit which is guaranteed to lie above the dirty pages.
912 */
913 thresh = max(thresh, dirty);
914 if (limit > thresh) {
915 limit -= (limit - thresh) >> 5;
916 goto update;
917 }
918 return;
919update:
920 global_dirty_limit = limit;
921}
922
923static void global_update_bandwidth(unsigned long thresh,
924 unsigned long dirty,
925 unsigned long now)
926{
927 static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(dirty_lock);
Tejun Heo7d70e152015-03-04 10:37:43 -0500928 static unsigned long update_time = INITIAL_JIFFIES;
Wu Fengguangc42843f2011-03-02 15:54:09 -0600929
930 /*
931 * check locklessly first to optimize away locking for the most time
932 */
933 if (time_before(now, update_time + BANDWIDTH_INTERVAL))
934 return;
935
936 spin_lock(&dirty_lock);
937 if (time_after_eq(now, update_time + BANDWIDTH_INTERVAL)) {
938 update_dirty_limit(thresh, dirty);
939 update_time = now;
940 }
941 spin_unlock(&dirty_lock);
942}
943
Wu Fengguangbe3ffa22011-06-12 10:51:31 -0600944/*
Tejun Heode1fff32015-05-22 17:13:29 -0400945 * Maintain wb->dirty_ratelimit, the base dirty throttle rate.
Wu Fengguangbe3ffa22011-06-12 10:51:31 -0600946 *
Tejun Heode1fff32015-05-22 17:13:29 -0400947 * Normal wb tasks will be curbed at or below it in long term.
Wu Fengguangbe3ffa22011-06-12 10:51:31 -0600948 * Obviously it should be around (write_bw / N) when there are N dd tasks.
949 */
Tejun Heoa88a3412015-05-22 17:13:28 -0400950static void wb_update_dirty_ratelimit(struct bdi_writeback *wb,
951 unsigned long thresh,
952 unsigned long bg_thresh,
953 unsigned long dirty,
Tejun Heode1fff32015-05-22 17:13:29 -0400954 unsigned long wb_thresh,
955 unsigned long wb_dirty,
Tejun Heoa88a3412015-05-22 17:13:28 -0400956 unsigned long dirtied,
957 unsigned long elapsed)
Wu Fengguangbe3ffa22011-06-12 10:51:31 -0600958{
Wu Fengguang73811312011-08-26 15:53:24 -0600959 unsigned long freerun = dirty_freerun_ceiling(thresh, bg_thresh);
960 unsigned long limit = hard_dirty_limit(thresh);
961 unsigned long setpoint = (freerun + limit) / 2;
Tejun Heoa88a3412015-05-22 17:13:28 -0400962 unsigned long write_bw = wb->avg_write_bandwidth;
963 unsigned long dirty_ratelimit = wb->dirty_ratelimit;
Wu Fengguangbe3ffa22011-06-12 10:51:31 -0600964 unsigned long dirty_rate;
965 unsigned long task_ratelimit;
966 unsigned long balanced_dirty_ratelimit;
967 unsigned long pos_ratio;
Wu Fengguang73811312011-08-26 15:53:24 -0600968 unsigned long step;
969 unsigned long x;
Wu Fengguangbe3ffa22011-06-12 10:51:31 -0600970
971 /*
972 * The dirty rate will match the writeout rate in long term, except
973 * when dirty pages are truncated by userspace or re-dirtied by FS.
974 */
Tejun Heoa88a3412015-05-22 17:13:28 -0400975 dirty_rate = (dirtied - wb->dirtied_stamp) * HZ / elapsed;
Wu Fengguangbe3ffa22011-06-12 10:51:31 -0600976
Tejun Heoa88a3412015-05-22 17:13:28 -0400977 pos_ratio = wb_position_ratio(wb, thresh, bg_thresh, dirty,
Tejun Heode1fff32015-05-22 17:13:29 -0400978 wb_thresh, wb_dirty);
Wu Fengguangbe3ffa22011-06-12 10:51:31 -0600979 /*
980 * task_ratelimit reflects each dd's dirty rate for the past 200ms.
981 */
982 task_ratelimit = (u64)dirty_ratelimit *
983 pos_ratio >> RATELIMIT_CALC_SHIFT;
984 task_ratelimit++; /* it helps rampup dirty_ratelimit from tiny values */
985
986 /*
987 * A linear estimation of the "balanced" throttle rate. The theory is,
Tejun Heode1fff32015-05-22 17:13:29 -0400988 * if there are N dd tasks, each throttled at task_ratelimit, the wb's
Wu Fengguangbe3ffa22011-06-12 10:51:31 -0600989 * dirty_rate will be measured to be (N * task_ratelimit). So the below
990 * formula will yield the balanced rate limit (write_bw / N).
991 *
992 * Note that the expanded form is not a pure rate feedback:
993 * rate_(i+1) = rate_(i) * (write_bw / dirty_rate) (1)
994 * but also takes pos_ratio into account:
995 * rate_(i+1) = rate_(i) * (write_bw / dirty_rate) * pos_ratio (2)
996 *
997 * (1) is not realistic because pos_ratio also takes part in balancing
998 * the dirty rate. Consider the state
999 * pos_ratio = 0.5 (3)
1000 * rate = 2 * (write_bw / N) (4)
1001 * If (1) is used, it will stuck in that state! Because each dd will
1002 * be throttled at
1003 * task_ratelimit = pos_ratio * rate = (write_bw / N) (5)
1004 * yielding
1005 * dirty_rate = N * task_ratelimit = write_bw (6)
1006 * put (6) into (1) we get
1007 * rate_(i+1) = rate_(i) (7)
1008 *
1009 * So we end up using (2) to always keep
1010 * rate_(i+1) ~= (write_bw / N) (8)
1011 * regardless of the value of pos_ratio. As long as (8) is satisfied,
1012 * pos_ratio is able to drive itself to 1.0, which is not only where
1013 * the dirty count meet the setpoint, but also where the slope of
1014 * pos_ratio is most flat and hence task_ratelimit is least fluctuated.
1015 */
1016 balanced_dirty_ratelimit = div_u64((u64)task_ratelimit * write_bw,
1017 dirty_rate | 1);
Wu Fengguangbdaac492011-08-03 14:30:36 -06001018 /*
1019 * balanced_dirty_ratelimit ~= (write_bw / N) <= write_bw
1020 */
1021 if (unlikely(balanced_dirty_ratelimit > write_bw))
1022 balanced_dirty_ratelimit = write_bw;
Wu Fengguangbe3ffa22011-06-12 10:51:31 -06001023
Wu Fengguang73811312011-08-26 15:53:24 -06001024 /*
1025 * We could safely do this and return immediately:
1026 *
Tejun Heode1fff32015-05-22 17:13:29 -04001027 * wb->dirty_ratelimit = balanced_dirty_ratelimit;
Wu Fengguang73811312011-08-26 15:53:24 -06001028 *
1029 * However to get a more stable dirty_ratelimit, the below elaborated
Wanpeng Li331cbde2012-06-09 11:10:55 +08001030 * code makes use of task_ratelimit to filter out singular points and
Wu Fengguang73811312011-08-26 15:53:24 -06001031 * limit the step size.
1032 *
1033 * The below code essentially only uses the relative value of
1034 *
1035 * task_ratelimit - dirty_ratelimit
1036 * = (pos_ratio - 1) * dirty_ratelimit
1037 *
1038 * which reflects the direction and size of dirty position error.
1039 */
1040
1041 /*
1042 * dirty_ratelimit will follow balanced_dirty_ratelimit iff
1043 * task_ratelimit is on the same side of dirty_ratelimit, too.
1044 * For example, when
1045 * - dirty_ratelimit > balanced_dirty_ratelimit
1046 * - dirty_ratelimit > task_ratelimit (dirty pages are above setpoint)
1047 * lowering dirty_ratelimit will help meet both the position and rate
1048 * control targets. Otherwise, don't update dirty_ratelimit if it will
1049 * only help meet the rate target. After all, what the users ultimately
1050 * feel and care are stable dirty rate and small position error.
1051 *
1052 * |task_ratelimit - dirty_ratelimit| is used to limit the step size
Wanpeng Li331cbde2012-06-09 11:10:55 +08001053 * and filter out the singular points of balanced_dirty_ratelimit. Which
Wu Fengguang73811312011-08-26 15:53:24 -06001054 * keeps jumping around randomly and can even leap far away at times
1055 * due to the small 200ms estimation period of dirty_rate (we want to
1056 * keep that period small to reduce time lags).
1057 */
1058 step = 0;
Maxim Patlasov5a537482013-09-11 14:22:46 -07001059
1060 /*
Tejun Heode1fff32015-05-22 17:13:29 -04001061 * For strictlimit case, calculations above were based on wb counters
Tejun Heoa88a3412015-05-22 17:13:28 -04001062 * and limits (starting from pos_ratio = wb_position_ratio() and up to
Maxim Patlasov5a537482013-09-11 14:22:46 -07001063 * balanced_dirty_ratelimit = task_ratelimit * write_bw / dirty_rate).
Tejun Heode1fff32015-05-22 17:13:29 -04001064 * Hence, to calculate "step" properly, we have to use wb_dirty as
1065 * "dirty" and wb_setpoint as "setpoint".
Maxim Patlasov5a537482013-09-11 14:22:46 -07001066 *
Tejun Heode1fff32015-05-22 17:13:29 -04001067 * We rampup dirty_ratelimit forcibly if wb_dirty is low because
1068 * it's possible that wb_thresh is close to zero due to inactivity
Tejun Heoa88a3412015-05-22 17:13:28 -04001069 * of backing device (see the implementation of wb_dirty_limit()).
Maxim Patlasov5a537482013-09-11 14:22:46 -07001070 */
Tejun Heoa88a3412015-05-22 17:13:28 -04001071 if (unlikely(wb->bdi->capabilities & BDI_CAP_STRICTLIMIT)) {
Tejun Heode1fff32015-05-22 17:13:29 -04001072 dirty = wb_dirty;
1073 if (wb_dirty < 8)
1074 setpoint = wb_dirty + 1;
Maxim Patlasov5a537482013-09-11 14:22:46 -07001075 else
Tejun Heode1fff32015-05-22 17:13:29 -04001076 setpoint = (wb_thresh +
Tejun Heoa88a3412015-05-22 17:13:28 -04001077 wb_dirty_limit(wb, bg_thresh)) / 2;
Maxim Patlasov5a537482013-09-11 14:22:46 -07001078 }
1079
Wu Fengguang73811312011-08-26 15:53:24 -06001080 if (dirty < setpoint) {
Tejun Heoa88a3412015-05-22 17:13:28 -04001081 x = min3(wb->balanced_dirty_ratelimit,
Mark Rustad7c809962014-10-09 15:28:15 -07001082 balanced_dirty_ratelimit, task_ratelimit);
Wu Fengguang73811312011-08-26 15:53:24 -06001083 if (dirty_ratelimit < x)
1084 step = x - dirty_ratelimit;
1085 } else {
Tejun Heoa88a3412015-05-22 17:13:28 -04001086 x = max3(wb->balanced_dirty_ratelimit,
Mark Rustad7c809962014-10-09 15:28:15 -07001087 balanced_dirty_ratelimit, task_ratelimit);
Wu Fengguang73811312011-08-26 15:53:24 -06001088 if (dirty_ratelimit > x)
1089 step = dirty_ratelimit - x;
1090 }
1091
1092 /*
1093 * Don't pursue 100% rate matching. It's impossible since the balanced
1094 * rate itself is constantly fluctuating. So decrease the track speed
1095 * when it gets close to the target. Helps eliminate pointless tremors.
1096 */
1097 step >>= dirty_ratelimit / (2 * step + 1);
1098 /*
1099 * Limit the tracking speed to avoid overshooting.
1100 */
1101 step = (step + 7) / 8;
1102
1103 if (dirty_ratelimit < balanced_dirty_ratelimit)
1104 dirty_ratelimit += step;
1105 else
1106 dirty_ratelimit -= step;
1107
Tejun Heoa88a3412015-05-22 17:13:28 -04001108 wb->dirty_ratelimit = max(dirty_ratelimit, 1UL);
1109 wb->balanced_dirty_ratelimit = balanced_dirty_ratelimit;
Wu Fengguangb48c1042011-03-02 17:22:49 -06001110
Tejun Heoa88a3412015-05-22 17:13:28 -04001111 trace_bdi_dirty_ratelimit(wb->bdi, dirty_rate, task_ratelimit);
Wu Fengguangbe3ffa22011-06-12 10:51:31 -06001112}
1113
Tejun Heoa88a3412015-05-22 17:13:28 -04001114void __wb_update_bandwidth(struct bdi_writeback *wb,
1115 unsigned long thresh,
1116 unsigned long bg_thresh,
1117 unsigned long dirty,
Tejun Heode1fff32015-05-22 17:13:29 -04001118 unsigned long wb_thresh,
1119 unsigned long wb_dirty,
Tejun Heoa88a3412015-05-22 17:13:28 -04001120 unsigned long start_time)
Wu Fengguange98be2d2010-08-29 11:22:30 -06001121{
1122 unsigned long now = jiffies;
Tejun Heoa88a3412015-05-22 17:13:28 -04001123 unsigned long elapsed = now - wb->bw_time_stamp;
Wu Fengguangbe3ffa22011-06-12 10:51:31 -06001124 unsigned long dirtied;
Wu Fengguange98be2d2010-08-29 11:22:30 -06001125 unsigned long written;
1126
1127 /*
1128 * rate-limit, only update once every 200ms.
1129 */
1130 if (elapsed < BANDWIDTH_INTERVAL)
1131 return;
1132
Tejun Heoa88a3412015-05-22 17:13:28 -04001133 dirtied = percpu_counter_read(&wb->stat[WB_DIRTIED]);
1134 written = percpu_counter_read(&wb->stat[WB_WRITTEN]);
Wu Fengguange98be2d2010-08-29 11:22:30 -06001135
1136 /*
1137 * Skip quiet periods when disk bandwidth is under-utilized.
1138 * (at least 1s idle time between two flusher runs)
1139 */
Tejun Heoa88a3412015-05-22 17:13:28 -04001140 if (elapsed > HZ && time_before(wb->bw_time_stamp, start_time))
Wu Fengguange98be2d2010-08-29 11:22:30 -06001141 goto snapshot;
1142
Wu Fengguangbe3ffa22011-06-12 10:51:31 -06001143 if (thresh) {
Wu Fengguangc42843f2011-03-02 15:54:09 -06001144 global_update_bandwidth(thresh, dirty, now);
Tejun Heoa88a3412015-05-22 17:13:28 -04001145 wb_update_dirty_ratelimit(wb, thresh, bg_thresh, dirty,
Tejun Heode1fff32015-05-22 17:13:29 -04001146 wb_thresh, wb_dirty,
Tejun Heoa88a3412015-05-22 17:13:28 -04001147 dirtied, elapsed);
Wu Fengguangbe3ffa22011-06-12 10:51:31 -06001148 }
Tejun Heoa88a3412015-05-22 17:13:28 -04001149 wb_update_write_bandwidth(wb, elapsed, written);
Wu Fengguange98be2d2010-08-29 11:22:30 -06001150
1151snapshot:
Tejun Heoa88a3412015-05-22 17:13:28 -04001152 wb->dirtied_stamp = dirtied;
1153 wb->written_stamp = written;
1154 wb->bw_time_stamp = now;
Wu Fengguange98be2d2010-08-29 11:22:30 -06001155}
1156
Tejun Heoa88a3412015-05-22 17:13:28 -04001157static void wb_update_bandwidth(struct bdi_writeback *wb,
1158 unsigned long thresh,
1159 unsigned long bg_thresh,
1160 unsigned long dirty,
Tejun Heode1fff32015-05-22 17:13:29 -04001161 unsigned long wb_thresh,
1162 unsigned long wb_dirty,
Tejun Heoa88a3412015-05-22 17:13:28 -04001163 unsigned long start_time)
Wu Fengguange98be2d2010-08-29 11:22:30 -06001164{
Tejun Heoa88a3412015-05-22 17:13:28 -04001165 if (time_is_after_eq_jiffies(wb->bw_time_stamp + BANDWIDTH_INTERVAL))
Wu Fengguange98be2d2010-08-29 11:22:30 -06001166 return;
Tejun Heoa88a3412015-05-22 17:13:28 -04001167 spin_lock(&wb->list_lock);
1168 __wb_update_bandwidth(wb, thresh, bg_thresh, dirty,
Tejun Heode1fff32015-05-22 17:13:29 -04001169 wb_thresh, wb_dirty, start_time);
Tejun Heoa88a3412015-05-22 17:13:28 -04001170 spin_unlock(&wb->list_lock);
Wu Fengguange98be2d2010-08-29 11:22:30 -06001171}
1172
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07001173/*
Namjae Jeond0e1d662012-12-11 16:00:21 -08001174 * After a task dirtied this many pages, balance_dirty_pages_ratelimited()
Wu Fengguang9d823e82011-06-11 18:10:12 -06001175 * will look to see if it needs to start dirty throttling.
1176 *
1177 * If dirty_poll_interval is too low, big NUMA machines will call the expensive
1178 * global_page_state() too often. So scale it near-sqrt to the safety margin
1179 * (the number of pages we may dirty without exceeding the dirty limits).
1180 */
1181static unsigned long dirty_poll_interval(unsigned long dirty,
1182 unsigned long thresh)
1183{
1184 if (thresh > dirty)
1185 return 1UL << (ilog2(thresh - dirty) >> 1);
1186
1187 return 1;
1188}
1189
Tejun Heoa88a3412015-05-22 17:13:28 -04001190static unsigned long wb_max_pause(struct bdi_writeback *wb,
Tejun Heode1fff32015-05-22 17:13:29 -04001191 unsigned long wb_dirty)
Wu Fengguangc8462cc2011-06-11 19:21:43 -06001192{
Tejun Heoa88a3412015-05-22 17:13:28 -04001193 unsigned long bw = wb->avg_write_bandwidth;
Fengguang Wue3b6c652013-10-16 13:47:03 -07001194 unsigned long t;
Wu Fengguangc8462cc2011-06-11 19:21:43 -06001195
1196 /*
1197 * Limit pause time for small memory systems. If sleeping for too long
1198 * time, a small pool of dirty/writeback pages may go empty and disk go
1199 * idle.
1200 *
1201 * 8 serves as the safety ratio.
1202 */
Tejun Heode1fff32015-05-22 17:13:29 -04001203 t = wb_dirty / (1 + bw / roundup_pow_of_two(1 + HZ / 8));
Wu Fengguang7ccb9ad2011-11-30 11:08:55 -06001204 t++;
1205
Fengguang Wue3b6c652013-10-16 13:47:03 -07001206 return min_t(unsigned long, t, MAX_PAUSE);
Wu Fengguang7ccb9ad2011-11-30 11:08:55 -06001207}
1208
Tejun Heoa88a3412015-05-22 17:13:28 -04001209static long wb_min_pause(struct bdi_writeback *wb,
1210 long max_pause,
1211 unsigned long task_ratelimit,
1212 unsigned long dirty_ratelimit,
1213 int *nr_dirtied_pause)
Wu Fengguang7ccb9ad2011-11-30 11:08:55 -06001214{
Tejun Heoa88a3412015-05-22 17:13:28 -04001215 long hi = ilog2(wb->avg_write_bandwidth);
1216 long lo = ilog2(wb->dirty_ratelimit);
Wu Fengguang7ccb9ad2011-11-30 11:08:55 -06001217 long t; /* target pause */
1218 long pause; /* estimated next pause */
1219 int pages; /* target nr_dirtied_pause */
1220
1221 /* target for 10ms pause on 1-dd case */
1222 t = max(1, HZ / 100);
Wu Fengguangc8462cc2011-06-11 19:21:43 -06001223
1224 /*
Wu Fengguang7ccb9ad2011-11-30 11:08:55 -06001225 * Scale up pause time for concurrent dirtiers in order to reduce CPU
1226 * overheads.
1227 *
1228 * (N * 10ms) on 2^N concurrent tasks.
Wu Fengguangc8462cc2011-06-11 19:21:43 -06001229 */
Wu Fengguang7ccb9ad2011-11-30 11:08:55 -06001230 if (hi > lo)
1231 t += (hi - lo) * (10 * HZ) / 1024;
1232
1233 /*
1234 * This is a bit convoluted. We try to base the next nr_dirtied_pause
1235 * on the much more stable dirty_ratelimit. However the next pause time
1236 * will be computed based on task_ratelimit and the two rate limits may
1237 * depart considerably at some time. Especially if task_ratelimit goes
1238 * below dirty_ratelimit/2 and the target pause is max_pause, the next
1239 * pause time will be max_pause*2 _trimmed down_ to max_pause. As a
1240 * result task_ratelimit won't be executed faithfully, which could
1241 * eventually bring down dirty_ratelimit.
1242 *
1243 * We apply two rules to fix it up:
1244 * 1) try to estimate the next pause time and if necessary, use a lower
1245 * nr_dirtied_pause so as not to exceed max_pause. When this happens,
1246 * nr_dirtied_pause will be "dancing" with task_ratelimit.
1247 * 2) limit the target pause time to max_pause/2, so that the normal
1248 * small fluctuations of task_ratelimit won't trigger rule (1) and
1249 * nr_dirtied_pause will remain as stable as dirty_ratelimit.
1250 */
1251 t = min(t, 1 + max_pause / 2);
1252 pages = dirty_ratelimit * t / roundup_pow_of_two(HZ);
1253
Wu Fengguang5b9b3572011-12-06 13:17:17 -06001254 /*
1255 * Tiny nr_dirtied_pause is found to hurt I/O performance in the test
1256 * case fio-mmap-randwrite-64k, which does 16*{sync read, async write}.
1257 * When the 16 consecutive reads are often interrupted by some dirty
1258 * throttling pause during the async writes, cfq will go into idles
1259 * (deadline is fine). So push nr_dirtied_pause as high as possible
1260 * until reaches DIRTY_POLL_THRESH=32 pages.
1261 */
1262 if (pages < DIRTY_POLL_THRESH) {
1263 t = max_pause;
1264 pages = dirty_ratelimit * t / roundup_pow_of_two(HZ);
1265 if (pages > DIRTY_POLL_THRESH) {
1266 pages = DIRTY_POLL_THRESH;
1267 t = HZ * DIRTY_POLL_THRESH / dirty_ratelimit;
1268 }
1269 }
1270
Wu Fengguang7ccb9ad2011-11-30 11:08:55 -06001271 pause = HZ * pages / (task_ratelimit + 1);
1272 if (pause > max_pause) {
1273 t = max_pause;
1274 pages = task_ratelimit * t / roundup_pow_of_two(HZ);
1275 }
1276
1277 *nr_dirtied_pause = pages;
1278 /*
1279 * The minimal pause time will normally be half the target pause time.
1280 */
Wu Fengguang5b9b3572011-12-06 13:17:17 -06001281 return pages >= DIRTY_POLL_THRESH ? 1 + t / 2 : t;
Wu Fengguangc8462cc2011-06-11 19:21:43 -06001282}
1283
Tejun Heoa88a3412015-05-22 17:13:28 -04001284static inline void wb_dirty_limits(struct bdi_writeback *wb,
1285 unsigned long dirty_thresh,
1286 unsigned long background_thresh,
Tejun Heode1fff32015-05-22 17:13:29 -04001287 unsigned long *wb_dirty,
1288 unsigned long *wb_thresh,
1289 unsigned long *wb_bg_thresh)
Maxim Patlasov5a537482013-09-11 14:22:46 -07001290{
Tejun Heo93f78d82015-05-22 17:13:27 -04001291 unsigned long wb_reclaimable;
Maxim Patlasov5a537482013-09-11 14:22:46 -07001292
1293 /*
Tejun Heode1fff32015-05-22 17:13:29 -04001294 * wb_thresh is not treated as some limiting factor as
Maxim Patlasov5a537482013-09-11 14:22:46 -07001295 * dirty_thresh, due to reasons
Tejun Heode1fff32015-05-22 17:13:29 -04001296 * - in JBOD setup, wb_thresh can fluctuate a lot
Maxim Patlasov5a537482013-09-11 14:22:46 -07001297 * - in a system with HDD and USB key, the USB key may somehow
Tejun Heode1fff32015-05-22 17:13:29 -04001298 * go into state (wb_dirty >> wb_thresh) either because
1299 * wb_dirty starts high, or because wb_thresh drops low.
Maxim Patlasov5a537482013-09-11 14:22:46 -07001300 * In this case we don't want to hard throttle the USB key
Tejun Heode1fff32015-05-22 17:13:29 -04001301 * dirtiers for 100 seconds until wb_dirty drops under
1302 * wb_thresh. Instead the auxiliary wb control line in
Tejun Heoa88a3412015-05-22 17:13:28 -04001303 * wb_position_ratio() will let the dirtier task progress
Tejun Heode1fff32015-05-22 17:13:29 -04001304 * at some rate <= (write_bw / 2) for bringing down wb_dirty.
Maxim Patlasov5a537482013-09-11 14:22:46 -07001305 */
Tejun Heode1fff32015-05-22 17:13:29 -04001306 *wb_thresh = wb_dirty_limit(wb, dirty_thresh);
Maxim Patlasov5a537482013-09-11 14:22:46 -07001307
Tejun Heode1fff32015-05-22 17:13:29 -04001308 if (wb_bg_thresh)
1309 *wb_bg_thresh = dirty_thresh ? div_u64((u64)*wb_thresh *
1310 background_thresh,
1311 dirty_thresh) : 0;
Maxim Patlasov5a537482013-09-11 14:22:46 -07001312
1313 /*
1314 * In order to avoid the stacked BDI deadlock we need
1315 * to ensure we accurately count the 'dirty' pages when
1316 * the threshold is low.
1317 *
1318 * Otherwise it would be possible to get thresh+n pages
1319 * reported dirty, even though there are thresh-m pages
1320 * actually dirty; with m+n sitting in the percpu
1321 * deltas.
1322 */
Tejun Heode1fff32015-05-22 17:13:29 -04001323 if (*wb_thresh < 2 * wb_stat_error(wb)) {
Tejun Heo93f78d82015-05-22 17:13:27 -04001324 wb_reclaimable = wb_stat_sum(wb, WB_RECLAIMABLE);
Tejun Heode1fff32015-05-22 17:13:29 -04001325 *wb_dirty = wb_reclaimable + wb_stat_sum(wb, WB_WRITEBACK);
Maxim Patlasov5a537482013-09-11 14:22:46 -07001326 } else {
Tejun Heo93f78d82015-05-22 17:13:27 -04001327 wb_reclaimable = wb_stat(wb, WB_RECLAIMABLE);
Tejun Heode1fff32015-05-22 17:13:29 -04001328 *wb_dirty = wb_reclaimable + wb_stat(wb, WB_WRITEBACK);
Maxim Patlasov5a537482013-09-11 14:22:46 -07001329 }
1330}
1331
Wu Fengguang9d823e82011-06-11 18:10:12 -06001332/*
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07001333 * balance_dirty_pages() must be called by processes which are generating dirty
1334 * data. It looks at the number of dirty pages in the machine and will force
Wu Fengguang143dfe82010-08-27 18:45:12 -06001335 * the caller to wait once crossing the (background_thresh + dirty_thresh) / 2.
Jens Axboe5b0830c2009-09-23 19:37:09 +02001336 * If we're over `background_thresh' then the writeback threads are woken to
1337 * perform some writeout.
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07001338 */
Wu Fengguang3a2e9a52009-09-23 21:56:00 +08001339static void balance_dirty_pages(struct address_space *mapping,
Wu Fengguang143dfe82010-08-27 18:45:12 -06001340 unsigned long pages_dirtied)
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07001341{
Wu Fengguang143dfe82010-08-27 18:45:12 -06001342 unsigned long nr_reclaimable; /* = file_dirty + unstable_nfs */
Wu Fengguang77627412010-09-12 13:34:05 -06001343 unsigned long nr_dirty; /* = file_dirty + writeback + unstable_nfs */
David Rientjes364aeb22009-01-06 14:39:29 -08001344 unsigned long background_thresh;
1345 unsigned long dirty_thresh;
Wu Fengguang83712352011-06-11 19:25:42 -06001346 long period;
Wu Fengguang7ccb9ad2011-11-30 11:08:55 -06001347 long pause;
1348 long max_pause;
1349 long min_pause;
1350 int nr_dirtied_pause;
Wu Fengguange50e3722010-08-11 14:17:37 -07001351 bool dirty_exceeded = false;
Wu Fengguang143dfe82010-08-27 18:45:12 -06001352 unsigned long task_ratelimit;
Wu Fengguang7ccb9ad2011-11-30 11:08:55 -06001353 unsigned long dirty_ratelimit;
Wu Fengguang143dfe82010-08-27 18:45:12 -06001354 unsigned long pos_ratio;
Christoph Hellwigde1414a2015-01-14 10:42:36 +01001355 struct backing_dev_info *bdi = inode_to_bdi(mapping->host);
Tejun Heoa88a3412015-05-22 17:13:28 -04001356 struct bdi_writeback *wb = &bdi->wb;
Maxim Patlasov5a537482013-09-11 14:22:46 -07001357 bool strictlimit = bdi->capabilities & BDI_CAP_STRICTLIMIT;
Wu Fengguange98be2d2010-08-29 11:22:30 -06001358 unsigned long start_time = jiffies;
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07001359
1360 for (;;) {
Wu Fengguang83712352011-06-11 19:25:42 -06001361 unsigned long now = jiffies;
Tejun Heode1fff32015-05-22 17:13:29 -04001362 unsigned long uninitialized_var(wb_thresh);
Maxim Patlasov5a537482013-09-11 14:22:46 -07001363 unsigned long thresh;
Tejun Heode1fff32015-05-22 17:13:29 -04001364 unsigned long uninitialized_var(wb_dirty);
Maxim Patlasov5a537482013-09-11 14:22:46 -07001365 unsigned long dirty;
1366 unsigned long bg_thresh;
Wu Fengguang83712352011-06-11 19:25:42 -06001367
Wu Fengguang143dfe82010-08-27 18:45:12 -06001368 /*
1369 * Unstable writes are a feature of certain networked
1370 * filesystems (i.e. NFS) in which data may have been
1371 * written to the server's write cache, but has not yet
1372 * been flushed to permanent storage.
1373 */
Peter Zijlstra5fce25a2007-11-14 16:59:15 -08001374 nr_reclaimable = global_page_state(NR_FILE_DIRTY) +
1375 global_page_state(NR_UNSTABLE_NFS);
Wu Fengguang77627412010-09-12 13:34:05 -06001376 nr_dirty = nr_reclaimable + global_page_state(NR_WRITEBACK);
Peter Zijlstra5fce25a2007-11-14 16:59:15 -08001377
Wu Fengguang16c40422010-08-11 14:17:39 -07001378 global_dirty_limits(&background_thresh, &dirty_thresh);
1379
Maxim Patlasov5a537482013-09-11 14:22:46 -07001380 if (unlikely(strictlimit)) {
Tejun Heoa88a3412015-05-22 17:13:28 -04001381 wb_dirty_limits(wb, dirty_thresh, background_thresh,
Tejun Heode1fff32015-05-22 17:13:29 -04001382 &wb_dirty, &wb_thresh, &bg_thresh);
Maxim Patlasov5a537482013-09-11 14:22:46 -07001383
Tejun Heode1fff32015-05-22 17:13:29 -04001384 dirty = wb_dirty;
1385 thresh = wb_thresh;
Maxim Patlasov5a537482013-09-11 14:22:46 -07001386 } else {
1387 dirty = nr_dirty;
1388 thresh = dirty_thresh;
1389 bg_thresh = background_thresh;
1390 }
1391
Wu Fengguang16c40422010-08-11 14:17:39 -07001392 /*
1393 * Throttle it only when the background writeback cannot
1394 * catch-up. This avoids (excessively) small writeouts
Tejun Heode1fff32015-05-22 17:13:29 -04001395 * when the wb limits are ramping up in case of !strictlimit.
Maxim Patlasov5a537482013-09-11 14:22:46 -07001396 *
Tejun Heode1fff32015-05-22 17:13:29 -04001397 * In strictlimit case make decision based on the wb counters
1398 * and limits. Small writeouts when the wb limits are ramping
Maxim Patlasov5a537482013-09-11 14:22:46 -07001399 * up are the price we consciously pay for strictlimit-ing.
Wu Fengguang16c40422010-08-11 14:17:39 -07001400 */
Maxim Patlasov5a537482013-09-11 14:22:46 -07001401 if (dirty <= dirty_freerun_ceiling(thresh, bg_thresh)) {
Wu Fengguang83712352011-06-11 19:25:42 -06001402 current->dirty_paused_when = now;
1403 current->nr_dirtied = 0;
Wu Fengguang7ccb9ad2011-11-30 11:08:55 -06001404 current->nr_dirtied_pause =
Maxim Patlasov5a537482013-09-11 14:22:46 -07001405 dirty_poll_interval(dirty, thresh);
Wu Fengguang16c40422010-08-11 14:17:39 -07001406 break;
Wu Fengguang83712352011-06-11 19:25:42 -06001407 }
Wu Fengguang16c40422010-08-11 14:17:39 -07001408
Wu Fengguang143dfe82010-08-27 18:45:12 -06001409 if (unlikely(!writeback_in_progress(bdi)))
1410 bdi_start_background_writeback(bdi);
1411
Maxim Patlasov5a537482013-09-11 14:22:46 -07001412 if (!strictlimit)
Tejun Heoa88a3412015-05-22 17:13:28 -04001413 wb_dirty_limits(wb, dirty_thresh, background_thresh,
Tejun Heode1fff32015-05-22 17:13:29 -04001414 &wb_dirty, &wb_thresh, NULL);
Peter Zijlstra5fce25a2007-11-14 16:59:15 -08001415
Tejun Heode1fff32015-05-22 17:13:29 -04001416 dirty_exceeded = (wb_dirty > wb_thresh) &&
Maxim Patlasov5a537482013-09-11 14:22:46 -07001417 ((nr_dirty > dirty_thresh) || strictlimit);
Tejun Heoa88a3412015-05-22 17:13:28 -04001418 if (dirty_exceeded && !wb->dirty_exceeded)
1419 wb->dirty_exceeded = 1;
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07001420
Tejun Heoa88a3412015-05-22 17:13:28 -04001421 wb_update_bandwidth(wb, dirty_thresh, background_thresh,
Tejun Heode1fff32015-05-22 17:13:29 -04001422 nr_dirty, wb_thresh, wb_dirty, start_time);
Wu Fengguange98be2d2010-08-29 11:22:30 -06001423
Tejun Heoa88a3412015-05-22 17:13:28 -04001424 dirty_ratelimit = wb->dirty_ratelimit;
1425 pos_ratio = wb_position_ratio(wb, dirty_thresh,
1426 background_thresh, nr_dirty,
Tejun Heode1fff32015-05-22 17:13:29 -04001427 wb_thresh, wb_dirty);
Wu Fengguang3a73dbb2011-11-07 19:19:28 +08001428 task_ratelimit = ((u64)dirty_ratelimit * pos_ratio) >>
1429 RATELIMIT_CALC_SHIFT;
Tejun Heode1fff32015-05-22 17:13:29 -04001430 max_pause = wb_max_pause(wb, wb_dirty);
Tejun Heoa88a3412015-05-22 17:13:28 -04001431 min_pause = wb_min_pause(wb, max_pause,
1432 task_ratelimit, dirty_ratelimit,
1433 &nr_dirtied_pause);
Wu Fengguang7ccb9ad2011-11-30 11:08:55 -06001434
Wu Fengguang3a73dbb2011-11-07 19:19:28 +08001435 if (unlikely(task_ratelimit == 0)) {
Wu Fengguang83712352011-06-11 19:25:42 -06001436 period = max_pause;
Wu Fengguangc8462cc2011-06-11 19:21:43 -06001437 pause = max_pause;
Wu Fengguang143dfe82010-08-27 18:45:12 -06001438 goto pause;
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07001439 }
Wu Fengguang83712352011-06-11 19:25:42 -06001440 period = HZ * pages_dirtied / task_ratelimit;
1441 pause = period;
1442 if (current->dirty_paused_when)
1443 pause -= now - current->dirty_paused_when;
1444 /*
1445 * For less than 1s think time (ext3/4 may block the dirtier
1446 * for up to 800ms from time to time on 1-HDD; so does xfs,
1447 * however at much less frequency), try to compensate it in
1448 * future periods by updating the virtual time; otherwise just
1449 * do a reset, as it may be a light dirtier.
1450 */
Wu Fengguang7ccb9ad2011-11-30 11:08:55 -06001451 if (pause < min_pause) {
Wu Fengguangece13ac2010-08-29 23:33:20 -06001452 trace_balance_dirty_pages(bdi,
1453 dirty_thresh,
1454 background_thresh,
1455 nr_dirty,
Tejun Heode1fff32015-05-22 17:13:29 -04001456 wb_thresh,
1457 wb_dirty,
Wu Fengguangece13ac2010-08-29 23:33:20 -06001458 dirty_ratelimit,
1459 task_ratelimit,
1460 pages_dirtied,
Wu Fengguang83712352011-06-11 19:25:42 -06001461 period,
Wu Fengguang7ccb9ad2011-11-30 11:08:55 -06001462 min(pause, 0L),
Wu Fengguangece13ac2010-08-29 23:33:20 -06001463 start_time);
Wu Fengguang83712352011-06-11 19:25:42 -06001464 if (pause < -HZ) {
1465 current->dirty_paused_when = now;
1466 current->nr_dirtied = 0;
1467 } else if (period) {
1468 current->dirty_paused_when += period;
1469 current->nr_dirtied = 0;
Wu Fengguang7ccb9ad2011-11-30 11:08:55 -06001470 } else if (current->nr_dirtied_pause <= pages_dirtied)
1471 current->nr_dirtied_pause += pages_dirtied;
Wu Fengguang57fc9782011-06-11 19:32:32 -06001472 break;
1473 }
Wu Fengguang7ccb9ad2011-11-30 11:08:55 -06001474 if (unlikely(pause > max_pause)) {
1475 /* for occasional dropped task_ratelimit */
1476 now += min(pause - max_pause, max_pause);
1477 pause = max_pause;
1478 }
Wu Fengguang143dfe82010-08-27 18:45:12 -06001479
1480pause:
Wu Fengguangece13ac2010-08-29 23:33:20 -06001481 trace_balance_dirty_pages(bdi,
1482 dirty_thresh,
1483 background_thresh,
1484 nr_dirty,
Tejun Heode1fff32015-05-22 17:13:29 -04001485 wb_thresh,
1486 wb_dirty,
Wu Fengguangece13ac2010-08-29 23:33:20 -06001487 dirty_ratelimit,
1488 task_ratelimit,
1489 pages_dirtied,
Wu Fengguang83712352011-06-11 19:25:42 -06001490 period,
Wu Fengguangece13ac2010-08-29 23:33:20 -06001491 pause,
1492 start_time);
Jan Kara499d05e2011-11-16 19:34:48 +08001493 __set_current_state(TASK_KILLABLE);
Wu Fengguangd25105e2009-10-09 12:40:42 +02001494 io_schedule_timeout(pause);
Jens Axboe87c6a9b2009-09-17 19:59:14 +02001495
Wu Fengguang83712352011-06-11 19:25:42 -06001496 current->dirty_paused_when = now + pause;
1497 current->nr_dirtied = 0;
Wu Fengguang7ccb9ad2011-11-30 11:08:55 -06001498 current->nr_dirtied_pause = nr_dirtied_pause;
Wu Fengguang83712352011-06-11 19:25:42 -06001499
Wu Fengguangffd1f602011-06-19 22:18:42 -06001500 /*
Wu Fengguang1df64712011-11-13 19:47:32 -06001501 * This is typically equal to (nr_dirty < dirty_thresh) and can
1502 * also keep "1000+ dd on a slow USB stick" under control.
Wu Fengguangffd1f602011-06-19 22:18:42 -06001503 */
Wu Fengguang1df64712011-11-13 19:47:32 -06001504 if (task_ratelimit)
Wu Fengguangffd1f602011-06-19 22:18:42 -06001505 break;
Jan Kara499d05e2011-11-16 19:34:48 +08001506
Wu Fengguangc5c63432011-12-02 10:21:33 -06001507 /*
1508 * In the case of an unresponding NFS server and the NFS dirty
Tejun Heode1fff32015-05-22 17:13:29 -04001509 * pages exceeds dirty_thresh, give the other good wb's a pipe
Wu Fengguangc5c63432011-12-02 10:21:33 -06001510 * to go through, so that tasks on them still remain responsive.
1511 *
1512 * In theory 1 page is enough to keep the comsumer-producer
1513 * pipe going: the flusher cleans 1 page => the task dirties 1
Tejun Heode1fff32015-05-22 17:13:29 -04001514 * more page. However wb_dirty has accounting errors. So use
Tejun Heo93f78d82015-05-22 17:13:27 -04001515 * the larger and more IO friendly wb_stat_error.
Wu Fengguangc5c63432011-12-02 10:21:33 -06001516 */
Tejun Heode1fff32015-05-22 17:13:29 -04001517 if (wb_dirty <= wb_stat_error(wb))
Wu Fengguangc5c63432011-12-02 10:21:33 -06001518 break;
1519
Jan Kara499d05e2011-11-16 19:34:48 +08001520 if (fatal_signal_pending(current))
1521 break;
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07001522 }
1523
Tejun Heoa88a3412015-05-22 17:13:28 -04001524 if (!dirty_exceeded && wb->dirty_exceeded)
1525 wb->dirty_exceeded = 0;
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07001526
1527 if (writeback_in_progress(bdi))
Jens Axboe5b0830c2009-09-23 19:37:09 +02001528 return;
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07001529
1530 /*
1531 * In laptop mode, we wait until hitting the higher threshold before
1532 * starting background writeout, and then write out all the way down
1533 * to the lower threshold. So slow writers cause minimal disk activity.
1534 *
1535 * In normal mode, we start background writeout at the lower
1536 * background_thresh, to keep the amount of dirty memory low.
1537 */
Wu Fengguang143dfe82010-08-27 18:45:12 -06001538 if (laptop_mode)
1539 return;
1540
1541 if (nr_reclaimable > background_thresh)
Christoph Hellwigc5444192010-06-08 18:15:15 +02001542 bdi_start_background_writeback(bdi);
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07001543}
1544
Wu Fengguang9d823e82011-06-11 18:10:12 -06001545static DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, bdp_ratelimits);
Tejun Heo245b2e72009-06-24 15:13:48 +09001546
Wu Fengguang54848d72011-04-05 13:21:19 -06001547/*
1548 * Normal tasks are throttled by
1549 * loop {
1550 * dirty tsk->nr_dirtied_pause pages;
1551 * take a snap in balance_dirty_pages();
1552 * }
1553 * However there is a worst case. If every task exit immediately when dirtied
1554 * (tsk->nr_dirtied_pause - 1) pages, balance_dirty_pages() will never be
1555 * called to throttle the page dirties. The solution is to save the not yet
1556 * throttled page dirties in dirty_throttle_leaks on task exit and charge them
1557 * randomly into the running tasks. This works well for the above worst case,
1558 * as the new task will pick up and accumulate the old task's leaked dirty
1559 * count and eventually get throttled.
1560 */
1561DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, dirty_throttle_leaks) = 0;
1562
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07001563/**
Namjae Jeond0e1d662012-12-11 16:00:21 -08001564 * balance_dirty_pages_ratelimited - balance dirty memory state
Martin Waitz67be2dd2005-05-01 08:59:26 -07001565 * @mapping: address_space which was dirtied
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07001566 *
1567 * Processes which are dirtying memory should call in here once for each page
1568 * which was newly dirtied. The function will periodically check the system's
1569 * dirty state and will initiate writeback if needed.
1570 *
1571 * On really big machines, get_writeback_state is expensive, so try to avoid
1572 * calling it too often (ratelimiting). But once we're over the dirty memory
1573 * limit we decrease the ratelimiting by a lot, to prevent individual processes
1574 * from overshooting the limit by (ratelimit_pages) each.
1575 */
Namjae Jeond0e1d662012-12-11 16:00:21 -08001576void balance_dirty_pages_ratelimited(struct address_space *mapping)
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07001577{
Christoph Hellwigde1414a2015-01-14 10:42:36 +01001578 struct backing_dev_info *bdi = inode_to_bdi(mapping->host);
Tejun Heoa88a3412015-05-22 17:13:28 -04001579 struct bdi_writeback *wb = &bdi->wb;
Wu Fengguang9d823e82011-06-11 18:10:12 -06001580 int ratelimit;
1581 int *p;
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07001582
Wu Fengguang36715ce2011-06-11 17:53:57 -06001583 if (!bdi_cap_account_dirty(bdi))
1584 return;
1585
Wu Fengguang9d823e82011-06-11 18:10:12 -06001586 ratelimit = current->nr_dirtied_pause;
Tejun Heoa88a3412015-05-22 17:13:28 -04001587 if (wb->dirty_exceeded)
Wu Fengguang9d823e82011-06-11 18:10:12 -06001588 ratelimit = min(ratelimit, 32 >> (PAGE_SHIFT - 10));
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07001589
Andrew Mortonfa5a7342006-03-24 03:18:10 -08001590 preempt_disable();
Wu Fengguang9d823e82011-06-11 18:10:12 -06001591 /*
1592 * This prevents one CPU to accumulate too many dirtied pages without
1593 * calling into balance_dirty_pages(), which can happen when there are
1594 * 1000+ tasks, all of them start dirtying pages at exactly the same
1595 * time, hence all honoured too large initial task->nr_dirtied_pause.
1596 */
Christoph Lameter7c8e0182014-06-04 16:07:56 -07001597 p = this_cpu_ptr(&bdp_ratelimits);
Wu Fengguang9d823e82011-06-11 18:10:12 -06001598 if (unlikely(current->nr_dirtied >= ratelimit))
Andrew Mortonfa5a7342006-03-24 03:18:10 -08001599 *p = 0;
Wu Fengguangd3bc1fe2011-04-14 07:52:37 -06001600 else if (unlikely(*p >= ratelimit_pages)) {
1601 *p = 0;
1602 ratelimit = 0;
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07001603 }
Wu Fengguang54848d72011-04-05 13:21:19 -06001604 /*
1605 * Pick up the dirtied pages by the exited tasks. This avoids lots of
1606 * short-lived tasks (eg. gcc invocations in a kernel build) escaping
1607 * the dirty throttling and livelock other long-run dirtiers.
1608 */
Christoph Lameter7c8e0182014-06-04 16:07:56 -07001609 p = this_cpu_ptr(&dirty_throttle_leaks);
Wu Fengguang54848d72011-04-05 13:21:19 -06001610 if (*p > 0 && current->nr_dirtied < ratelimit) {
Namjae Jeond0e1d662012-12-11 16:00:21 -08001611 unsigned long nr_pages_dirtied;
Wu Fengguang54848d72011-04-05 13:21:19 -06001612 nr_pages_dirtied = min(*p, ratelimit - current->nr_dirtied);
1613 *p -= nr_pages_dirtied;
1614 current->nr_dirtied += nr_pages_dirtied;
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07001615 }
Andrew Mortonfa5a7342006-03-24 03:18:10 -08001616 preempt_enable();
Wu Fengguang9d823e82011-06-11 18:10:12 -06001617
1618 if (unlikely(current->nr_dirtied >= ratelimit))
1619 balance_dirty_pages(mapping, current->nr_dirtied);
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07001620}
Namjae Jeond0e1d662012-12-11 16:00:21 -08001621EXPORT_SYMBOL(balance_dirty_pages_ratelimited);
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07001622
Andrew Morton232ea4d2007-02-28 20:13:21 -08001623void throttle_vm_writeout(gfp_t gfp_mask)
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07001624{
David Rientjes364aeb22009-01-06 14:39:29 -08001625 unsigned long background_thresh;
1626 unsigned long dirty_thresh;
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07001627
1628 for ( ; ; ) {
Wu Fengguang16c40422010-08-11 14:17:39 -07001629 global_dirty_limits(&background_thresh, &dirty_thresh);
Fengguang Wu47a13332012-03-21 16:34:09 -07001630 dirty_thresh = hard_dirty_limit(dirty_thresh);
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07001631
1632 /*
1633 * Boost the allowable dirty threshold a bit for page
1634 * allocators so they don't get DoS'ed by heavy writers
1635 */
1636 dirty_thresh += dirty_thresh / 10; /* wheeee... */
1637
Christoph Lameterc24f21b2006-06-30 01:55:42 -07001638 if (global_page_state(NR_UNSTABLE_NFS) +
1639 global_page_state(NR_WRITEBACK) <= dirty_thresh)
1640 break;
Jens Axboe8aa7e842009-07-09 14:52:32 +02001641 congestion_wait(BLK_RW_ASYNC, HZ/10);
Fengguang Wu369f2382007-10-16 23:30:45 -07001642
1643 /*
1644 * The caller might hold locks which can prevent IO completion
1645 * or progress in the filesystem. So we cannot just sit here
1646 * waiting for IO to complete.
1647 */
1648 if ((gfp_mask & (__GFP_FS|__GFP_IO)) != (__GFP_FS|__GFP_IO))
1649 break;
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07001650 }
1651}
1652
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07001653/*
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07001654 * sysctl handler for /proc/sys/vm/dirty_writeback_centisecs
1655 */
Joe Perchescccad5b2014-06-06 14:38:09 -07001656int dirty_writeback_centisecs_handler(struct ctl_table *table, int write,
Alexey Dobriyan8d65af72009-09-23 15:57:19 -07001657 void __user *buffer, size_t *length, loff_t *ppos)
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07001658{
Alexey Dobriyan8d65af72009-09-23 15:57:19 -07001659 proc_dointvec(table, write, buffer, length, ppos);
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07001660 return 0;
1661}
1662
Jens Axboec2c49862010-05-20 09:18:47 +02001663#ifdef CONFIG_BLOCK
Matthew Garrett31373d02010-04-06 14:25:14 +02001664void laptop_mode_timer_fn(unsigned long data)
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07001665{
Matthew Garrett31373d02010-04-06 14:25:14 +02001666 struct request_queue *q = (struct request_queue *)data;
1667 int nr_pages = global_page_state(NR_FILE_DIRTY) +
1668 global_page_state(NR_UNSTABLE_NFS);
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07001669
Matthew Garrett31373d02010-04-06 14:25:14 +02001670 /*
1671 * We want to write everything out, not just down to the dirty
1672 * threshold
1673 */
Matthew Garrett31373d02010-04-06 14:25:14 +02001674 if (bdi_has_dirty_io(&q->backing_dev_info))
Curt Wohlgemuth0e175a12011-10-07 21:54:10 -06001675 bdi_start_writeback(&q->backing_dev_info, nr_pages,
1676 WB_REASON_LAPTOP_TIMER);
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07001677}
1678
1679/*
1680 * We've spun up the disk and we're in laptop mode: schedule writeback
1681 * of all dirty data a few seconds from now. If the flush is already scheduled
1682 * then push it back - the user is still using the disk.
1683 */
Matthew Garrett31373d02010-04-06 14:25:14 +02001684void laptop_io_completion(struct backing_dev_info *info)
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07001685{
Matthew Garrett31373d02010-04-06 14:25:14 +02001686 mod_timer(&info->laptop_mode_wb_timer, jiffies + laptop_mode);
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07001687}
1688
1689/*
1690 * We're in laptop mode and we've just synced. The sync's writes will have
1691 * caused another writeback to be scheduled by laptop_io_completion.
1692 * Nothing needs to be written back anymore, so we unschedule the writeback.
1693 */
1694void laptop_sync_completion(void)
1695{
Matthew Garrett31373d02010-04-06 14:25:14 +02001696 struct backing_dev_info *bdi;
1697
1698 rcu_read_lock();
1699
1700 list_for_each_entry_rcu(bdi, &bdi_list, bdi_list)
1701 del_timer(&bdi->laptop_mode_wb_timer);
1702
1703 rcu_read_unlock();
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07001704}
Jens Axboec2c49862010-05-20 09:18:47 +02001705#endif
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07001706
1707/*
1708 * If ratelimit_pages is too high then we can get into dirty-data overload
1709 * if a large number of processes all perform writes at the same time.
1710 * If it is too low then SMP machines will call the (expensive)
1711 * get_writeback_state too often.
1712 *
1713 * Here we set ratelimit_pages to a level which ensures that when all CPUs are
1714 * dirtying in parallel, we cannot go more than 3% (1/32) over the dirty memory
Wu Fengguang9d823e82011-06-11 18:10:12 -06001715 * thresholds.
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07001716 */
1717
Chandra Seetharaman2d1d43f2006-09-29 02:01:25 -07001718void writeback_set_ratelimit(void)
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07001719{
Wu Fengguang9d823e82011-06-11 18:10:12 -06001720 unsigned long background_thresh;
1721 unsigned long dirty_thresh;
1722 global_dirty_limits(&background_thresh, &dirty_thresh);
Fengguang Wu68809c72012-05-06 13:21:42 +08001723 global_dirty_limit = dirty_thresh;
Wu Fengguang9d823e82011-06-11 18:10:12 -06001724 ratelimit_pages = dirty_thresh / (num_online_cpus() * 32);
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07001725 if (ratelimit_pages < 16)
1726 ratelimit_pages = 16;
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07001727}
1728
Paul Gortmaker0db06282013-06-19 14:53:51 -04001729static int
Srivatsa S. Bhat2f60d622012-09-28 20:27:49 +08001730ratelimit_handler(struct notifier_block *self, unsigned long action,
1731 void *hcpu)
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07001732{
Srivatsa S. Bhat2f60d622012-09-28 20:27:49 +08001733
1734 switch (action & ~CPU_TASKS_FROZEN) {
1735 case CPU_ONLINE:
1736 case CPU_DEAD:
1737 writeback_set_ratelimit();
1738 return NOTIFY_OK;
1739 default:
1740 return NOTIFY_DONE;
1741 }
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07001742}
1743
Paul Gortmaker0db06282013-06-19 14:53:51 -04001744static struct notifier_block ratelimit_nb = {
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07001745 .notifier_call = ratelimit_handler,
1746 .next = NULL,
1747};
1748
1749/*
Linus Torvaldsdc6e29d2007-01-29 16:37:38 -08001750 * Called early on to tune the page writeback dirty limits.
1751 *
1752 * We used to scale dirty pages according to how total memory
1753 * related to pages that could be allocated for buffers (by
1754 * comparing nr_free_buffer_pages() to vm_total_pages.
1755 *
1756 * However, that was when we used "dirty_ratio" to scale with
1757 * all memory, and we don't do that any more. "dirty_ratio"
1758 * is now applied to total non-HIGHPAGE memory (by subtracting
1759 * totalhigh_pages from vm_total_pages), and as such we can't
1760 * get into the old insane situation any more where we had
1761 * large amounts of dirty pages compared to a small amount of
1762 * non-HIGHMEM memory.
1763 *
1764 * But we might still want to scale the dirty_ratio by how
1765 * much memory the box has..
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07001766 */
1767void __init page_writeback_init(void)
1768{
Chandra Seetharaman2d1d43f2006-09-29 02:01:25 -07001769 writeback_set_ratelimit();
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07001770 register_cpu_notifier(&ratelimit_nb);
Peter Zijlstra04fbfdc2007-10-16 23:25:50 -07001771
Tejun Heo20ae0072014-09-08 09:51:30 +09001772 fprop_global_init(&writeout_completions, GFP_KERNEL);
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07001773}
1774
David Howells811d7362006-08-29 19:06:09 +01001775/**
Jan Karaf446daae2010-08-09 17:19:12 -07001776 * tag_pages_for_writeback - tag pages to be written by write_cache_pages
1777 * @mapping: address space structure to write
1778 * @start: starting page index
1779 * @end: ending page index (inclusive)
1780 *
1781 * This function scans the page range from @start to @end (inclusive) and tags
1782 * all pages that have DIRTY tag set with a special TOWRITE tag. The idea is
1783 * that write_cache_pages (or whoever calls this function) will then use
1784 * TOWRITE tag to identify pages eligible for writeback. This mechanism is
1785 * used to avoid livelocking of writeback by a process steadily creating new
1786 * dirty pages in the file (thus it is important for this function to be quick
1787 * so that it can tag pages faster than a dirtying process can create them).
1788 */
1789/*
1790 * We tag pages in batches of WRITEBACK_TAG_BATCH to reduce tree_lock latency.
1791 */
Jan Karaf446daae2010-08-09 17:19:12 -07001792void tag_pages_for_writeback(struct address_space *mapping,
1793 pgoff_t start, pgoff_t end)
1794{
Randy Dunlap3c111a02010-08-11 14:17:30 -07001795#define WRITEBACK_TAG_BATCH 4096
Jan Karaf446daae2010-08-09 17:19:12 -07001796 unsigned long tagged;
1797
1798 do {
1799 spin_lock_irq(&mapping->tree_lock);
1800 tagged = radix_tree_range_tag_if_tagged(&mapping->page_tree,
1801 &start, end, WRITEBACK_TAG_BATCH,
1802 PAGECACHE_TAG_DIRTY, PAGECACHE_TAG_TOWRITE);
1803 spin_unlock_irq(&mapping->tree_lock);
1804 WARN_ON_ONCE(tagged > WRITEBACK_TAG_BATCH);
1805 cond_resched();
Jan Karad5ed3a42010-08-19 14:13:33 -07001806 /* We check 'start' to handle wrapping when end == ~0UL */
1807 } while (tagged >= WRITEBACK_TAG_BATCH && start);
Jan Karaf446daae2010-08-09 17:19:12 -07001808}
1809EXPORT_SYMBOL(tag_pages_for_writeback);
1810
1811/**
Miklos Szeredi0ea97182007-05-10 22:22:51 -07001812 * write_cache_pages - walk the list of dirty pages of the given address space and write all of them.
David Howells811d7362006-08-29 19:06:09 +01001813 * @mapping: address space structure to write
1814 * @wbc: subtract the number of written pages from *@wbc->nr_to_write
Miklos Szeredi0ea97182007-05-10 22:22:51 -07001815 * @writepage: function called for each page
1816 * @data: data passed to writepage function
David Howells811d7362006-08-29 19:06:09 +01001817 *
Miklos Szeredi0ea97182007-05-10 22:22:51 -07001818 * If a page is already under I/O, write_cache_pages() skips it, even
David Howells811d7362006-08-29 19:06:09 +01001819 * if it's dirty. This is desirable behaviour for memory-cleaning writeback,
1820 * but it is INCORRECT for data-integrity system calls such as fsync(). fsync()
1821 * and msync() need to guarantee that all the data which was dirty at the time
1822 * the call was made get new I/O started against them. If wbc->sync_mode is
1823 * WB_SYNC_ALL then we were called for data integrity and we must wait for
1824 * existing IO to complete.
Jan Karaf446daae2010-08-09 17:19:12 -07001825 *
1826 * To avoid livelocks (when other process dirties new pages), we first tag
1827 * pages which should be written back with TOWRITE tag and only then start
1828 * writing them. For data-integrity sync we have to be careful so that we do
1829 * not miss some pages (e.g., because some other process has cleared TOWRITE
1830 * tag we set). The rule we follow is that TOWRITE tag can be cleared only
1831 * by the process clearing the DIRTY tag (and submitting the page for IO).
David Howells811d7362006-08-29 19:06:09 +01001832 */
Miklos Szeredi0ea97182007-05-10 22:22:51 -07001833int write_cache_pages(struct address_space *mapping,
1834 struct writeback_control *wbc, writepage_t writepage,
1835 void *data)
David Howells811d7362006-08-29 19:06:09 +01001836{
David Howells811d7362006-08-29 19:06:09 +01001837 int ret = 0;
1838 int done = 0;
David Howells811d7362006-08-29 19:06:09 +01001839 struct pagevec pvec;
1840 int nr_pages;
Nick Piggin31a12662009-01-06 14:39:04 -08001841 pgoff_t uninitialized_var(writeback_index);
David Howells811d7362006-08-29 19:06:09 +01001842 pgoff_t index;
1843 pgoff_t end; /* Inclusive */
Nick Pigginbd19e012009-01-06 14:39:06 -08001844 pgoff_t done_index;
Nick Piggin31a12662009-01-06 14:39:04 -08001845 int cycled;
David Howells811d7362006-08-29 19:06:09 +01001846 int range_whole = 0;
Jan Karaf446daae2010-08-09 17:19:12 -07001847 int tag;
David Howells811d7362006-08-29 19:06:09 +01001848
David Howells811d7362006-08-29 19:06:09 +01001849 pagevec_init(&pvec, 0);
1850 if (wbc->range_cyclic) {
Nick Piggin31a12662009-01-06 14:39:04 -08001851 writeback_index = mapping->writeback_index; /* prev offset */
1852 index = writeback_index;
1853 if (index == 0)
1854 cycled = 1;
1855 else
1856 cycled = 0;
David Howells811d7362006-08-29 19:06:09 +01001857 end = -1;
1858 } else {
1859 index = wbc->range_start >> PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT;
1860 end = wbc->range_end >> PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT;
1861 if (wbc->range_start == 0 && wbc->range_end == LLONG_MAX)
1862 range_whole = 1;
Nick Piggin31a12662009-01-06 14:39:04 -08001863 cycled = 1; /* ignore range_cyclic tests */
David Howells811d7362006-08-29 19:06:09 +01001864 }
Wu Fengguang6e6938b2010-06-06 10:38:15 -06001865 if (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_ALL || wbc->tagged_writepages)
Jan Karaf446daae2010-08-09 17:19:12 -07001866 tag = PAGECACHE_TAG_TOWRITE;
1867 else
1868 tag = PAGECACHE_TAG_DIRTY;
David Howells811d7362006-08-29 19:06:09 +01001869retry:
Wu Fengguang6e6938b2010-06-06 10:38:15 -06001870 if (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_ALL || wbc->tagged_writepages)
Jan Karaf446daae2010-08-09 17:19:12 -07001871 tag_pages_for_writeback(mapping, index, end);
Nick Pigginbd19e012009-01-06 14:39:06 -08001872 done_index = index;
Nick Piggin5a3d5c92009-01-06 14:39:09 -08001873 while (!done && (index <= end)) {
1874 int i;
1875
Jan Karaf446daae2010-08-09 17:19:12 -07001876 nr_pages = pagevec_lookup_tag(&pvec, mapping, &index, tag,
Nick Piggin5a3d5c92009-01-06 14:39:09 -08001877 min(end - index, (pgoff_t)PAGEVEC_SIZE-1) + 1);
1878 if (nr_pages == 0)
1879 break;
David Howells811d7362006-08-29 19:06:09 +01001880
David Howells811d7362006-08-29 19:06:09 +01001881 for (i = 0; i < nr_pages; i++) {
1882 struct page *page = pvec.pages[i];
1883
Nick Piggind5482cd2009-01-06 14:39:11 -08001884 /*
1885 * At this point, the page may be truncated or
1886 * invalidated (changing page->mapping to NULL), or
1887 * even swizzled back from swapper_space to tmpfs file
1888 * mapping. However, page->index will not change
1889 * because we have a reference on the page.
1890 */
1891 if (page->index > end) {
1892 /*
1893 * can't be range_cyclic (1st pass) because
1894 * end == -1 in that case.
1895 */
1896 done = 1;
1897 break;
1898 }
1899
Jun'ichi Nomuracf15b072011-03-22 16:33:40 -07001900 done_index = page->index;
Nick Pigginbd19e012009-01-06 14:39:06 -08001901
David Howells811d7362006-08-29 19:06:09 +01001902 lock_page(page);
1903
Nick Piggin5a3d5c92009-01-06 14:39:09 -08001904 /*
1905 * Page truncated or invalidated. We can freely skip it
1906 * then, even for data integrity operations: the page
1907 * has disappeared concurrently, so there could be no
1908 * real expectation of this data interity operation
1909 * even if there is now a new, dirty page at the same
1910 * pagecache address.
1911 */
David Howells811d7362006-08-29 19:06:09 +01001912 if (unlikely(page->mapping != mapping)) {
Nick Piggin5a3d5c92009-01-06 14:39:09 -08001913continue_unlock:
David Howells811d7362006-08-29 19:06:09 +01001914 unlock_page(page);
1915 continue;
1916 }
1917
Nick Piggin515f4a02009-01-06 14:39:10 -08001918 if (!PageDirty(page)) {
1919 /* someone wrote it for us */
1920 goto continue_unlock;
1921 }
David Howells811d7362006-08-29 19:06:09 +01001922
Nick Piggin515f4a02009-01-06 14:39:10 -08001923 if (PageWriteback(page)) {
1924 if (wbc->sync_mode != WB_SYNC_NONE)
1925 wait_on_page_writeback(page);
1926 else
1927 goto continue_unlock;
1928 }
1929
1930 BUG_ON(PageWriteback(page));
1931 if (!clear_page_dirty_for_io(page))
Nick Piggin5a3d5c92009-01-06 14:39:09 -08001932 goto continue_unlock;
David Howells811d7362006-08-29 19:06:09 +01001933
Christoph Hellwigde1414a2015-01-14 10:42:36 +01001934 trace_wbc_writepage(wbc, inode_to_bdi(mapping->host));
Miklos Szeredi0ea97182007-05-10 22:22:51 -07001935 ret = (*writepage)(page, wbc, data);
Nick Piggin00266772009-01-06 14:39:06 -08001936 if (unlikely(ret)) {
1937 if (ret == AOP_WRITEPAGE_ACTIVATE) {
1938 unlock_page(page);
1939 ret = 0;
1940 } else {
1941 /*
1942 * done_index is set past this page,
1943 * so media errors will not choke
1944 * background writeout for the entire
1945 * file. This has consequences for
1946 * range_cyclic semantics (ie. it may
1947 * not be suitable for data integrity
1948 * writeout).
1949 */
Jun'ichi Nomuracf15b072011-03-22 16:33:40 -07001950 done_index = page->index + 1;
Nick Piggin00266772009-01-06 14:39:06 -08001951 done = 1;
1952 break;
1953 }
Dave Chinner0b564922010-06-09 10:37:18 +10001954 }
David Howells811d7362006-08-29 19:06:09 +01001955
Dave Chinner546a1922010-08-24 11:44:34 +10001956 /*
1957 * We stop writing back only if we are not doing
1958 * integrity sync. In case of integrity sync we have to
1959 * keep going until we have written all the pages
1960 * we tagged for writeback prior to entering this loop.
1961 */
1962 if (--wbc->nr_to_write <= 0 &&
1963 wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_NONE) {
1964 done = 1;
1965 break;
Nick Piggin05fe4782009-01-06 14:39:08 -08001966 }
David Howells811d7362006-08-29 19:06:09 +01001967 }
1968 pagevec_release(&pvec);
1969 cond_resched();
1970 }
Nick Piggin3a4c6802009-02-12 04:34:23 +01001971 if (!cycled && !done) {
David Howells811d7362006-08-29 19:06:09 +01001972 /*
Nick Piggin31a12662009-01-06 14:39:04 -08001973 * range_cyclic:
David Howells811d7362006-08-29 19:06:09 +01001974 * We hit the last page and there is more work to be done: wrap
1975 * back to the start of the file
1976 */
Nick Piggin31a12662009-01-06 14:39:04 -08001977 cycled = 1;
David Howells811d7362006-08-29 19:06:09 +01001978 index = 0;
Nick Piggin31a12662009-01-06 14:39:04 -08001979 end = writeback_index - 1;
David Howells811d7362006-08-29 19:06:09 +01001980 goto retry;
1981 }
Dave Chinner0b564922010-06-09 10:37:18 +10001982 if (wbc->range_cyclic || (range_whole && wbc->nr_to_write > 0))
1983 mapping->writeback_index = done_index;
Aneesh Kumar K.V06d6cf62008-07-11 19:27:31 -04001984
David Howells811d7362006-08-29 19:06:09 +01001985 return ret;
1986}
Miklos Szeredi0ea97182007-05-10 22:22:51 -07001987EXPORT_SYMBOL(write_cache_pages);
1988
1989/*
1990 * Function used by generic_writepages to call the real writepage
1991 * function and set the mapping flags on error
1992 */
1993static int __writepage(struct page *page, struct writeback_control *wbc,
1994 void *data)
1995{
1996 struct address_space *mapping = data;
1997 int ret = mapping->a_ops->writepage(page, wbc);
1998 mapping_set_error(mapping, ret);
1999 return ret;
2000}
2001
2002/**
2003 * generic_writepages - walk the list of dirty pages of the given address space and writepage() all of them.
2004 * @mapping: address space structure to write
2005 * @wbc: subtract the number of written pages from *@wbc->nr_to_write
2006 *
2007 * This is a library function, which implements the writepages()
2008 * address_space_operation.
2009 */
2010int generic_writepages(struct address_space *mapping,
2011 struct writeback_control *wbc)
2012{
Shaohua Li9b6096a2011-03-17 10:47:06 +01002013 struct blk_plug plug;
2014 int ret;
2015
Miklos Szeredi0ea97182007-05-10 22:22:51 -07002016 /* deal with chardevs and other special file */
2017 if (!mapping->a_ops->writepage)
2018 return 0;
2019
Shaohua Li9b6096a2011-03-17 10:47:06 +01002020 blk_start_plug(&plug);
2021 ret = write_cache_pages(mapping, wbc, __writepage, mapping);
2022 blk_finish_plug(&plug);
2023 return ret;
Miklos Szeredi0ea97182007-05-10 22:22:51 -07002024}
David Howells811d7362006-08-29 19:06:09 +01002025
2026EXPORT_SYMBOL(generic_writepages);
2027
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07002028int do_writepages(struct address_space *mapping, struct writeback_control *wbc)
2029{
Andrew Morton22905f72005-11-16 15:07:01 -08002030 int ret;
2031
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07002032 if (wbc->nr_to_write <= 0)
2033 return 0;
2034 if (mapping->a_ops->writepages)
Peter Zijlstrad08b3852006-09-25 23:30:57 -07002035 ret = mapping->a_ops->writepages(mapping, wbc);
Andrew Morton22905f72005-11-16 15:07:01 -08002036 else
2037 ret = generic_writepages(mapping, wbc);
Andrew Morton22905f72005-11-16 15:07:01 -08002038 return ret;
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07002039}
2040
2041/**
2042 * write_one_page - write out a single page and optionally wait on I/O
Martin Waitz67be2dd2005-05-01 08:59:26 -07002043 * @page: the page to write
2044 * @wait: if true, wait on writeout
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07002045 *
2046 * The page must be locked by the caller and will be unlocked upon return.
2047 *
2048 * write_one_page() returns a negative error code if I/O failed.
2049 */
2050int write_one_page(struct page *page, int wait)
2051{
2052 struct address_space *mapping = page->mapping;
2053 int ret = 0;
2054 struct writeback_control wbc = {
2055 .sync_mode = WB_SYNC_ALL,
2056 .nr_to_write = 1,
2057 };
2058
2059 BUG_ON(!PageLocked(page));
2060
2061 if (wait)
2062 wait_on_page_writeback(page);
2063
2064 if (clear_page_dirty_for_io(page)) {
2065 page_cache_get(page);
2066 ret = mapping->a_ops->writepage(page, &wbc);
2067 if (ret == 0 && wait) {
2068 wait_on_page_writeback(page);
2069 if (PageError(page))
2070 ret = -EIO;
2071 }
2072 page_cache_release(page);
2073 } else {
2074 unlock_page(page);
2075 }
2076 return ret;
2077}
2078EXPORT_SYMBOL(write_one_page);
2079
2080/*
Ken Chen76719322007-02-10 01:43:15 -08002081 * For address_spaces which do not use buffers nor write back.
2082 */
2083int __set_page_dirty_no_writeback(struct page *page)
2084{
2085 if (!PageDirty(page))
Bob Liuc3f0da62011-01-13 15:45:49 -08002086 return !TestSetPageDirty(page);
Ken Chen76719322007-02-10 01:43:15 -08002087 return 0;
2088}
2089
2090/*
Edward Shishkine3a7cca2009-03-31 15:19:39 -07002091 * Helper function for set_page_dirty family.
Greg Thelenc4843a72015-05-22 17:13:16 -04002092 *
2093 * Caller must hold mem_cgroup_begin_page_stat().
2094 *
Edward Shishkine3a7cca2009-03-31 15:19:39 -07002095 * NOTE: This relies on being atomic wrt interrupts.
2096 */
Greg Thelenc4843a72015-05-22 17:13:16 -04002097void account_page_dirtied(struct page *page, struct address_space *mapping,
2098 struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
Edward Shishkine3a7cca2009-03-31 15:19:39 -07002099{
Tejun Heo52ebea72015-05-22 17:13:37 -04002100 struct inode *inode = mapping->host;
2101
Tejun Heo9fb0a7d2013-01-11 13:06:37 -08002102 trace_writeback_dirty_page(page, mapping);
2103
Edward Shishkine3a7cca2009-03-31 15:19:39 -07002104 if (mapping_cap_account_dirty(mapping)) {
Tejun Heo52ebea72015-05-22 17:13:37 -04002105 struct bdi_writeback *wb;
2106
2107 inode_attach_wb(inode, page);
2108 wb = inode_to_wb(inode);
Christoph Hellwigde1414a2015-01-14 10:42:36 +01002109
Greg Thelenc4843a72015-05-22 17:13:16 -04002110 mem_cgroup_inc_page_stat(memcg, MEM_CGROUP_STAT_DIRTY);
Edward Shishkine3a7cca2009-03-31 15:19:39 -07002111 __inc_zone_page_state(page, NR_FILE_DIRTY);
Michael Rubinea941f02010-10-26 14:21:35 -07002112 __inc_zone_page_state(page, NR_DIRTIED);
Tejun Heo52ebea72015-05-22 17:13:37 -04002113 __inc_wb_stat(wb, WB_RECLAIMABLE);
2114 __inc_wb_stat(wb, WB_DIRTIED);
Edward Shishkine3a7cca2009-03-31 15:19:39 -07002115 task_io_account_write(PAGE_CACHE_SIZE);
Wu Fengguangd3bc1fe2011-04-14 07:52:37 -06002116 current->nr_dirtied++;
2117 this_cpu_inc(bdp_ratelimits);
Edward Shishkine3a7cca2009-03-31 15:19:39 -07002118 }
2119}
Michael Rubin679ceac2010-08-20 02:31:26 -07002120EXPORT_SYMBOL(account_page_dirtied);
Edward Shishkine3a7cca2009-03-31 15:19:39 -07002121
2122/*
Konstantin Khlebnikovb9ea2512015-04-14 15:45:27 -07002123 * Helper function for deaccounting dirty page without writeback.
Greg Thelenc4843a72015-05-22 17:13:16 -04002124 *
2125 * Caller must hold mem_cgroup_begin_page_stat().
Konstantin Khlebnikovb9ea2512015-04-14 15:45:27 -07002126 */
Greg Thelenc4843a72015-05-22 17:13:16 -04002127void account_page_cleaned(struct page *page, struct address_space *mapping,
2128 struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
Konstantin Khlebnikovb9ea2512015-04-14 15:45:27 -07002129{
2130 if (mapping_cap_account_dirty(mapping)) {
Greg Thelenc4843a72015-05-22 17:13:16 -04002131 mem_cgroup_dec_page_stat(memcg, MEM_CGROUP_STAT_DIRTY);
Konstantin Khlebnikovb9ea2512015-04-14 15:45:27 -07002132 dec_zone_page_state(page, NR_FILE_DIRTY);
Tejun Heo93f78d82015-05-22 17:13:27 -04002133 dec_wb_stat(&inode_to_bdi(mapping->host)->wb, WB_RECLAIMABLE);
Konstantin Khlebnikovb9ea2512015-04-14 15:45:27 -07002134 task_io_account_cancelled_write(PAGE_CACHE_SIZE);
2135 }
2136}
Konstantin Khlebnikovb9ea2512015-04-14 15:45:27 -07002137
2138/*
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07002139 * For address_spaces which do not use buffers. Just tag the page as dirty in
2140 * its radix tree.
2141 *
2142 * This is also used when a single buffer is being dirtied: we want to set the
2143 * page dirty in that case, but not all the buffers. This is a "bottom-up"
2144 * dirtying, whereas __set_page_dirty_buffers() is a "top-down" dirtying.
2145 *
Johannes Weiner2d6d7f92015-01-08 14:32:18 -08002146 * The caller must ensure this doesn't race with truncation. Most will simply
2147 * hold the page lock, but e.g. zap_pte_range() calls with the page mapped and
2148 * the pte lock held, which also locks out truncation.
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07002149 */
2150int __set_page_dirty_nobuffers(struct page *page)
2151{
Greg Thelenc4843a72015-05-22 17:13:16 -04002152 struct mem_cgroup *memcg;
2153
2154 memcg = mem_cgroup_begin_page_stat(page);
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07002155 if (!TestSetPageDirty(page)) {
2156 struct address_space *mapping = page_mapping(page);
KOSAKI Motohiroa85d9df2014-02-06 12:04:24 -08002157 unsigned long flags;
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07002158
Greg Thelenc4843a72015-05-22 17:13:16 -04002159 if (!mapping) {
2160 mem_cgroup_end_page_stat(memcg);
Andrew Morton8c085402006-12-10 02:19:24 -08002161 return 1;
Greg Thelenc4843a72015-05-22 17:13:16 -04002162 }
Andrew Morton8c085402006-12-10 02:19:24 -08002163
KOSAKI Motohiroa85d9df2014-02-06 12:04:24 -08002164 spin_lock_irqsave(&mapping->tree_lock, flags);
Johannes Weiner2d6d7f92015-01-08 14:32:18 -08002165 BUG_ON(page_mapping(page) != mapping);
2166 WARN_ON_ONCE(!PagePrivate(page) && !PageUptodate(page));
Greg Thelenc4843a72015-05-22 17:13:16 -04002167 account_page_dirtied(page, mapping, memcg);
Johannes Weiner2d6d7f92015-01-08 14:32:18 -08002168 radix_tree_tag_set(&mapping->page_tree, page_index(page),
2169 PAGECACHE_TAG_DIRTY);
KOSAKI Motohiroa85d9df2014-02-06 12:04:24 -08002170 spin_unlock_irqrestore(&mapping->tree_lock, flags);
Greg Thelenc4843a72015-05-22 17:13:16 -04002171 mem_cgroup_end_page_stat(memcg);
2172
Andrew Morton8c085402006-12-10 02:19:24 -08002173 if (mapping->host) {
2174 /* !PageAnon && !swapper_space */
2175 __mark_inode_dirty(mapping->host, I_DIRTY_PAGES);
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07002176 }
Andrew Morton4741c9f2006-03-24 03:18:11 -08002177 return 1;
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07002178 }
Greg Thelenc4843a72015-05-22 17:13:16 -04002179 mem_cgroup_end_page_stat(memcg);
Andrew Morton4741c9f2006-03-24 03:18:11 -08002180 return 0;
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07002181}
2182EXPORT_SYMBOL(__set_page_dirty_nobuffers);
2183
2184/*
Wu Fengguang2f800fb2011-08-08 15:22:00 -06002185 * Call this whenever redirtying a page, to de-account the dirty counters
2186 * (NR_DIRTIED, BDI_DIRTIED, tsk->nr_dirtied), so that they match the written
2187 * counters (NR_WRITTEN, BDI_WRITTEN) in long term. The mismatches will lead to
2188 * systematic errors in balanced_dirty_ratelimit and the dirty pages position
2189 * control.
2190 */
2191void account_page_redirty(struct page *page)
2192{
2193 struct address_space *mapping = page->mapping;
2194 if (mapping && mapping_cap_account_dirty(mapping)) {
2195 current->nr_dirtied--;
2196 dec_zone_page_state(page, NR_DIRTIED);
Tejun Heo93f78d82015-05-22 17:13:27 -04002197 dec_wb_stat(&inode_to_bdi(mapping->host)->wb, WB_DIRTIED);
Wu Fengguang2f800fb2011-08-08 15:22:00 -06002198 }
2199}
2200EXPORT_SYMBOL(account_page_redirty);
2201
2202/*
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07002203 * When a writepage implementation decides that it doesn't want to write this
2204 * page for some reason, it should redirty the locked page via
2205 * redirty_page_for_writepage() and it should then unlock the page and return 0
2206 */
2207int redirty_page_for_writepage(struct writeback_control *wbc, struct page *page)
2208{
Konstantin Khebnikov8d386332015-02-11 15:26:55 -08002209 int ret;
2210
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07002211 wbc->pages_skipped++;
Konstantin Khebnikov8d386332015-02-11 15:26:55 -08002212 ret = __set_page_dirty_nobuffers(page);
Wu Fengguang2f800fb2011-08-08 15:22:00 -06002213 account_page_redirty(page);
Konstantin Khebnikov8d386332015-02-11 15:26:55 -08002214 return ret;
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07002215}
2216EXPORT_SYMBOL(redirty_page_for_writepage);
2217
2218/*
Wu Fengguang6746aff2009-09-16 11:50:14 +02002219 * Dirty a page.
2220 *
2221 * For pages with a mapping this should be done under the page lock
2222 * for the benefit of asynchronous memory errors who prefer a consistent
2223 * dirty state. This rule can be broken in some special cases,
2224 * but should be better not to.
2225 *
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07002226 * If the mapping doesn't provide a set_page_dirty a_op, then
2227 * just fall through and assume that it wants buffer_heads.
2228 */
Nick Piggin1cf6e7d2009-02-18 14:48:18 -08002229int set_page_dirty(struct page *page)
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07002230{
2231 struct address_space *mapping = page_mapping(page);
2232
2233 if (likely(mapping)) {
2234 int (*spd)(struct page *) = mapping->a_ops->set_page_dirty;
Minchan Kim278df9f2011-03-22 16:32:54 -07002235 /*
2236 * readahead/lru_deactivate_page could remain
2237 * PG_readahead/PG_reclaim due to race with end_page_writeback
2238 * About readahead, if the page is written, the flags would be
2239 * reset. So no problem.
2240 * About lru_deactivate_page, if the page is redirty, the flag
2241 * will be reset. So no problem. but if the page is used by readahead
2242 * it will confuse readahead and make it restart the size rampup
2243 * process. But it's a trivial problem.
2244 */
Naoya Horiguchia4bb3ec2015-04-15 16:13:17 -07002245 if (PageReclaim(page))
2246 ClearPageReclaim(page);
David Howells93614012006-09-30 20:45:40 +02002247#ifdef CONFIG_BLOCK
2248 if (!spd)
2249 spd = __set_page_dirty_buffers;
2250#endif
2251 return (*spd)(page);
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07002252 }
Andrew Morton4741c9f2006-03-24 03:18:11 -08002253 if (!PageDirty(page)) {
2254 if (!TestSetPageDirty(page))
2255 return 1;
2256 }
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07002257 return 0;
2258}
2259EXPORT_SYMBOL(set_page_dirty);
2260
2261/*
2262 * set_page_dirty() is racy if the caller has no reference against
2263 * page->mapping->host, and if the page is unlocked. This is because another
2264 * CPU could truncate the page off the mapping and then free the mapping.
2265 *
2266 * Usually, the page _is_ locked, or the caller is a user-space process which
2267 * holds a reference on the inode by having an open file.
2268 *
2269 * In other cases, the page should be locked before running set_page_dirty().
2270 */
2271int set_page_dirty_lock(struct page *page)
2272{
2273 int ret;
2274
Jens Axboe7eaceac2011-03-10 08:52:07 +01002275 lock_page(page);
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07002276 ret = set_page_dirty(page);
2277 unlock_page(page);
2278 return ret;
2279}
2280EXPORT_SYMBOL(set_page_dirty_lock);
2281
2282/*
Tejun Heo11f81be2015-05-22 17:13:15 -04002283 * This cancels just the dirty bit on the kernel page itself, it does NOT
2284 * actually remove dirty bits on any mmap's that may be around. It also
2285 * leaves the page tagged dirty, so any sync activity will still find it on
2286 * the dirty lists, and in particular, clear_page_dirty_for_io() will still
2287 * look at the dirty bits in the VM.
2288 *
2289 * Doing this should *normally* only ever be done when a page is truncated,
2290 * and is not actually mapped anywhere at all. However, fs/buffer.c does
2291 * this when it notices that somebody has cleaned out all the buffers on a
2292 * page without actually doing it through the VM. Can you say "ext3 is
2293 * horribly ugly"? Thought you could.
2294 */
2295void cancel_dirty_page(struct page *page)
2296{
Greg Thelenc4843a72015-05-22 17:13:16 -04002297 struct address_space *mapping = page_mapping(page);
2298
2299 if (mapping_cap_account_dirty(mapping)) {
2300 struct mem_cgroup *memcg;
2301
2302 memcg = mem_cgroup_begin_page_stat(page);
2303
2304 if (TestClearPageDirty(page))
2305 account_page_cleaned(page, mapping, memcg);
2306
2307 mem_cgroup_end_page_stat(memcg);
2308 } else {
2309 ClearPageDirty(page);
2310 }
Tejun Heo11f81be2015-05-22 17:13:15 -04002311}
2312EXPORT_SYMBOL(cancel_dirty_page);
2313
2314/*
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07002315 * Clear a page's dirty flag, while caring for dirty memory accounting.
2316 * Returns true if the page was previously dirty.
2317 *
2318 * This is for preparing to put the page under writeout. We leave the page
2319 * tagged as dirty in the radix tree so that a concurrent write-for-sync
2320 * can discover it via a PAGECACHE_TAG_DIRTY walk. The ->writepage
2321 * implementation will run either set_page_writeback() or set_page_dirty(),
2322 * at which stage we bring the page's dirty flag and radix-tree dirty tag
2323 * back into sync.
2324 *
2325 * This incoherency between the page's dirty flag and radix-tree tag is
2326 * unfortunate, but it only exists while the page is locked.
2327 */
2328int clear_page_dirty_for_io(struct page *page)
2329{
2330 struct address_space *mapping = page_mapping(page);
Greg Thelenc4843a72015-05-22 17:13:16 -04002331 struct mem_cgroup *memcg;
2332 int ret = 0;
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07002333
Nick Piggin79352892007-07-19 01:47:22 -07002334 BUG_ON(!PageLocked(page));
2335
Linus Torvalds7658cc22006-12-29 10:00:58 -08002336 if (mapping && mapping_cap_account_dirty(mapping)) {
2337 /*
2338 * Yes, Virginia, this is indeed insane.
2339 *
2340 * We use this sequence to make sure that
2341 * (a) we account for dirty stats properly
2342 * (b) we tell the low-level filesystem to
2343 * mark the whole page dirty if it was
2344 * dirty in a pagetable. Only to then
2345 * (c) clean the page again and return 1 to
2346 * cause the writeback.
2347 *
2348 * This way we avoid all nasty races with the
2349 * dirty bit in multiple places and clearing
2350 * them concurrently from different threads.
2351 *
2352 * Note! Normally the "set_page_dirty(page)"
2353 * has no effect on the actual dirty bit - since
2354 * that will already usually be set. But we
2355 * need the side effects, and it can help us
2356 * avoid races.
2357 *
2358 * We basically use the page "master dirty bit"
2359 * as a serialization point for all the different
2360 * threads doing their things.
Linus Torvalds7658cc22006-12-29 10:00:58 -08002361 */
2362 if (page_mkclean(page))
2363 set_page_dirty(page);
Nick Piggin79352892007-07-19 01:47:22 -07002364 /*
2365 * We carefully synchronise fault handlers against
2366 * installing a dirty pte and marking the page dirty
Johannes Weiner2d6d7f92015-01-08 14:32:18 -08002367 * at this point. We do this by having them hold the
2368 * page lock while dirtying the page, and pages are
2369 * always locked coming in here, so we get the desired
2370 * exclusion.
Nick Piggin79352892007-07-19 01:47:22 -07002371 */
Greg Thelenc4843a72015-05-22 17:13:16 -04002372 memcg = mem_cgroup_begin_page_stat(page);
Linus Torvalds7658cc22006-12-29 10:00:58 -08002373 if (TestClearPageDirty(page)) {
Greg Thelenc4843a72015-05-22 17:13:16 -04002374 mem_cgroup_dec_page_stat(memcg, MEM_CGROUP_STAT_DIRTY);
Andrew Morton8c085402006-12-10 02:19:24 -08002375 dec_zone_page_state(page, NR_FILE_DIRTY);
Tejun Heo93f78d82015-05-22 17:13:27 -04002376 dec_wb_stat(&inode_to_bdi(mapping->host)->wb,
2377 WB_RECLAIMABLE);
Greg Thelenc4843a72015-05-22 17:13:16 -04002378 ret = 1;
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07002379 }
Greg Thelenc4843a72015-05-22 17:13:16 -04002380 mem_cgroup_end_page_stat(memcg);
2381 return ret;
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07002382 }
Linus Torvalds7658cc22006-12-29 10:00:58 -08002383 return TestClearPageDirty(page);
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07002384}
Hans Reiser58bb01a2005-11-18 01:10:53 -08002385EXPORT_SYMBOL(clear_page_dirty_for_io);
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07002386
2387int test_clear_page_writeback(struct page *page)
2388{
2389 struct address_space *mapping = page_mapping(page);
Johannes Weinerd7365e72014-10-29 14:50:48 -07002390 struct mem_cgroup *memcg;
Johannes Weinerd7365e72014-10-29 14:50:48 -07002391 int ret;
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07002392
Johannes Weiner6de22612015-02-11 15:25:01 -08002393 memcg = mem_cgroup_begin_page_stat(page);
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07002394 if (mapping) {
Christoph Hellwigde1414a2015-01-14 10:42:36 +01002395 struct backing_dev_info *bdi = inode_to_bdi(mapping->host);
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07002396 unsigned long flags;
2397
Nick Piggin19fd6232008-07-25 19:45:32 -07002398 spin_lock_irqsave(&mapping->tree_lock, flags);
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07002399 ret = TestClearPageWriteback(page);
Peter Zijlstra69cb51d2007-10-16 23:25:48 -07002400 if (ret) {
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07002401 radix_tree_tag_clear(&mapping->page_tree,
2402 page_index(page),
2403 PAGECACHE_TAG_WRITEBACK);
Miklos Szeredie4ad08f2008-04-30 00:54:37 -07002404 if (bdi_cap_account_writeback(bdi)) {
Tejun Heo93f78d82015-05-22 17:13:27 -04002405 __dec_wb_stat(&bdi->wb, WB_WRITEBACK);
2406 __wb_writeout_inc(&bdi->wb);
Peter Zijlstra04fbfdc2007-10-16 23:25:50 -07002407 }
Peter Zijlstra69cb51d2007-10-16 23:25:48 -07002408 }
Nick Piggin19fd6232008-07-25 19:45:32 -07002409 spin_unlock_irqrestore(&mapping->tree_lock, flags);
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07002410 } else {
2411 ret = TestClearPageWriteback(page);
2412 }
Wu Fengguang99b12e32011-07-25 17:12:37 -07002413 if (ret) {
Johannes Weinerd7365e72014-10-29 14:50:48 -07002414 mem_cgroup_dec_page_stat(memcg, MEM_CGROUP_STAT_WRITEBACK);
Andrew Mortond688abf2007-07-19 01:49:17 -07002415 dec_zone_page_state(page, NR_WRITEBACK);
Wu Fengguang99b12e32011-07-25 17:12:37 -07002416 inc_zone_page_state(page, NR_WRITTEN);
2417 }
Johannes Weiner6de22612015-02-11 15:25:01 -08002418 mem_cgroup_end_page_stat(memcg);
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07002419 return ret;
2420}
2421
Namjae Jeon1c8349a2014-05-12 08:12:25 -04002422int __test_set_page_writeback(struct page *page, bool keep_write)
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07002423{
2424 struct address_space *mapping = page_mapping(page);
Johannes Weinerd7365e72014-10-29 14:50:48 -07002425 struct mem_cgroup *memcg;
Johannes Weinerd7365e72014-10-29 14:50:48 -07002426 int ret;
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07002427
Johannes Weiner6de22612015-02-11 15:25:01 -08002428 memcg = mem_cgroup_begin_page_stat(page);
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07002429 if (mapping) {
Christoph Hellwigde1414a2015-01-14 10:42:36 +01002430 struct backing_dev_info *bdi = inode_to_bdi(mapping->host);
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07002431 unsigned long flags;
2432
Nick Piggin19fd6232008-07-25 19:45:32 -07002433 spin_lock_irqsave(&mapping->tree_lock, flags);
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07002434 ret = TestSetPageWriteback(page);
Peter Zijlstra69cb51d2007-10-16 23:25:48 -07002435 if (!ret) {
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07002436 radix_tree_tag_set(&mapping->page_tree,
2437 page_index(page),
2438 PAGECACHE_TAG_WRITEBACK);
Miklos Szeredie4ad08f2008-04-30 00:54:37 -07002439 if (bdi_cap_account_writeback(bdi))
Tejun Heo93f78d82015-05-22 17:13:27 -04002440 __inc_wb_stat(&bdi->wb, WB_WRITEBACK);
Peter Zijlstra69cb51d2007-10-16 23:25:48 -07002441 }
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07002442 if (!PageDirty(page))
2443 radix_tree_tag_clear(&mapping->page_tree,
2444 page_index(page),
2445 PAGECACHE_TAG_DIRTY);
Namjae Jeon1c8349a2014-05-12 08:12:25 -04002446 if (!keep_write)
2447 radix_tree_tag_clear(&mapping->page_tree,
2448 page_index(page),
2449 PAGECACHE_TAG_TOWRITE);
Nick Piggin19fd6232008-07-25 19:45:32 -07002450 spin_unlock_irqrestore(&mapping->tree_lock, flags);
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07002451 } else {
2452 ret = TestSetPageWriteback(page);
2453 }
Johannes Weiner3a3c02e2014-10-29 14:50:46 -07002454 if (!ret) {
Johannes Weinerd7365e72014-10-29 14:50:48 -07002455 mem_cgroup_inc_page_stat(memcg, MEM_CGROUP_STAT_WRITEBACK);
Johannes Weiner3a3c02e2014-10-29 14:50:46 -07002456 inc_zone_page_state(page, NR_WRITEBACK);
2457 }
Johannes Weiner6de22612015-02-11 15:25:01 -08002458 mem_cgroup_end_page_stat(memcg);
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07002459 return ret;
2460
2461}
Namjae Jeon1c8349a2014-05-12 08:12:25 -04002462EXPORT_SYMBOL(__test_set_page_writeback);
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07002463
2464/*
Nick Piggin00128182007-10-16 01:24:40 -07002465 * Return true if any of the pages in the mapping are marked with the
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07002466 * passed tag.
2467 */
2468int mapping_tagged(struct address_space *mapping, int tag)
2469{
Konstantin Khlebnikov72c47832011-07-25 17:12:31 -07002470 return radix_tree_tagged(&mapping->page_tree, tag);
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07002471}
2472EXPORT_SYMBOL(mapping_tagged);
Darrick J. Wong1d1d1a72013-02-21 16:42:51 -08002473
2474/**
2475 * wait_for_stable_page() - wait for writeback to finish, if necessary.
2476 * @page: The page to wait on.
2477 *
2478 * This function determines if the given page is related to a backing device
2479 * that requires page contents to be held stable during writeback. If so, then
2480 * it will wait for any pending writeback to complete.
2481 */
2482void wait_for_stable_page(struct page *page)
2483{
Christoph Hellwigde1414a2015-01-14 10:42:36 +01002484 if (bdi_cap_stable_pages_required(inode_to_bdi(page->mapping->host)))
2485 wait_on_page_writeback(page);
Darrick J. Wong1d1d1a72013-02-21 16:42:51 -08002486}
2487EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(wait_for_stable_page);