Greg Banks | b5cbc36 | 2009-03-26 17:45:27 +1100 | [diff] [blame] | 1 | |
| 2 | Kernel NFS Server Statistics |
| 3 | ============================ |
| 4 | |
| 5 | This document describes the format and semantics of the statistics |
| 6 | which the kernel NFS server makes available to userspace. These |
| 7 | statistics are available in several text form pseudo files, each of |
| 8 | which is described separately below. |
| 9 | |
| 10 | In most cases you don't need to know these formats, as the nfsstat(8) |
| 11 | program from the nfs-utils distribution provides a helpful command-line |
| 12 | interface for extracting and printing them. |
| 13 | |
| 14 | All the files described here are formatted as a sequence of text lines, |
| 15 | separated by newline '\n' characters. Lines beginning with a hash |
| 16 | '#' character are comments intended for humans and should be ignored |
| 17 | by parsing routines. All other lines contain a sequence of fields |
| 18 | separated by whitespace. |
| 19 | |
| 20 | /proc/fs/nfsd/pool_stats |
| 21 | ------------------------ |
| 22 | |
| 23 | This file is available in kernels from 2.6.30 onwards, if the |
| 24 | /proc/fs/nfsd filesystem is mounted (it almost always should be). |
| 25 | |
| 26 | The first line is a comment which describes the fields present in |
| 27 | all the other lines. The other lines present the following data as |
| 28 | a sequence of unsigned decimal numeric fields. One line is shown |
| 29 | for each NFS thread pool. |
| 30 | |
| 31 | All counters are 64 bits wide and wrap naturally. There is no way |
| 32 | to zero these counters, instead applications should do their own |
| 33 | rate conversion. |
| 34 | |
| 35 | pool |
| 36 | The id number of the NFS thread pool to which this line applies. |
| 37 | This number does not change. |
| 38 | |
| 39 | Thread pool ids are a contiguous set of small integers starting |
| 40 | at zero. The maximum value depends on the thread pool mode, but |
| 41 | currently cannot be larger than the number of CPUs in the system. |
| 42 | Note that in the default case there will be a single thread pool |
| 43 | which contains all the nfsd threads and all the CPUs in the system, |
| 44 | and thus this file will have a single line with a pool id of "0". |
| 45 | |
| 46 | packets-arrived |
| 47 | Counts how many NFS packets have arrived. More precisely, this |
| 48 | is the number of times that the network stack has notified the |
| 49 | sunrpc server layer that new data may be available on a transport |
| 50 | (e.g. an NFS or UDP socket or an NFS/RDMA endpoint). |
| 51 | |
| 52 | Depending on the NFS workload patterns and various network stack |
| 53 | effects (such as Large Receive Offload) which can combine packets |
| 54 | on the wire, this may be either more or less than the number |
| 55 | of NFS calls received (which statistic is available elsewhere). |
| 56 | However this is a more accurate and less workload-dependent measure |
| 57 | of how much CPU load is being placed on the sunrpc server layer |
| 58 | due to NFS network traffic. |
| 59 | |
| 60 | sockets-enqueued |
| 61 | Counts how many times an NFS transport is enqueued to wait for |
| 62 | an nfsd thread to service it, i.e. no nfsd thread was considered |
| 63 | available. |
| 64 | |
| 65 | The circumstance this statistic tracks indicates that there was NFS |
| 66 | network-facing work to be done but it couldn't be done immediately, |
| 67 | thus introducing a small delay in servicing NFS calls. The ideal |
| 68 | rate of change for this counter is zero; significantly non-zero |
| 69 | values may indicate a performance limitation. |
| 70 | |
| 71 | This can happen either because there are too few nfsd threads in the |
| 72 | thread pool for the NFS workload (the workload is thread-limited), |
| 73 | or because the NFS workload needs more CPU time than is available in |
| 74 | the thread pool (the workload is CPU-limited). In the former case, |
| 75 | configuring more nfsd threads will probably improve the performance |
| 76 | of the NFS workload. In the latter case, the sunrpc server layer is |
| 77 | already choosing not to wake idle nfsd threads because there are too |
| 78 | many nfsd threads which want to run but cannot, so configuring more |
| 79 | nfsd threads will make no difference whatsoever. The overloads-avoided |
| 80 | statistic (see below) can be used to distinguish these cases. |
| 81 | |
| 82 | threads-woken |
| 83 | Counts how many times an idle nfsd thread is woken to try to |
| 84 | receive some data from an NFS transport. |
| 85 | |
| 86 | This statistic tracks the circumstance where incoming |
| 87 | network-facing NFS work is being handled quickly, which is a good |
| 88 | thing. The ideal rate of change for this counter will be close |
| 89 | to but less than the rate of change of the packets-arrived counter. |
| 90 | |
| 91 | overloads-avoided |
| 92 | Counts how many times the sunrpc server layer chose not to wake an |
| 93 | nfsd thread, despite the presence of idle nfsd threads, because |
| 94 | too many nfsd threads had been recently woken but could not get |
| 95 | enough CPU time to actually run. |
| 96 | |
| 97 | This statistic counts a circumstance where the sunrpc layer |
| 98 | heuristically avoids overloading the CPU scheduler with too many |
| 99 | runnable nfsd threads. The ideal rate of change for this counter |
| 100 | is zero. Significant non-zero values indicate that the workload |
| 101 | is CPU limited. Usually this is associated with heavy CPU usage |
| 102 | on all the CPUs in the nfsd thread pool. |
| 103 | |
| 104 | If a sustained large overloads-avoided rate is detected on a pool, |
| 105 | the top(1) utility should be used to check for the following |
| 106 | pattern of CPU usage on all the CPUs associated with the given |
| 107 | nfsd thread pool. |
| 108 | |
| 109 | - %us ~= 0 (as you're *NOT* running applications on your NFS server) |
| 110 | |
| 111 | - %wa ~= 0 |
| 112 | |
| 113 | - %id ~= 0 |
| 114 | |
| 115 | - %sy + %hi + %si ~= 100 |
| 116 | |
| 117 | If this pattern is seen, configuring more nfsd threads will *not* |
| 118 | improve the performance of the workload. If this patten is not |
| 119 | seen, then something more subtle is wrong. |
| 120 | |
| 121 | threads-timedout |
| 122 | Counts how many times an nfsd thread triggered an idle timeout, |
| 123 | i.e. was not woken to handle any incoming network packets for |
| 124 | some time. |
| 125 | |
| 126 | This statistic counts a circumstance where there are more nfsd |
| 127 | threads configured than can be used by the NFS workload. This is |
| 128 | a clue that the number of nfsd threads can be reduced without |
| 129 | affecting performance. Unfortunately, it's only a clue and not |
| 130 | a strong indication, for a couple of reasons: |
| 131 | |
| 132 | - Currently the rate at which the counter is incremented is quite |
| 133 | slow; the idle timeout is 60 minutes. Unless the NFS workload |
| 134 | remains constant for hours at a time, this counter is unlikely |
| 135 | to be providing information that is still useful. |
| 136 | |
| 137 | - It is usually a wise policy to provide some slack, |
| 138 | i.e. configure a few more nfsds than are currently needed, |
| 139 | to allow for future spikes in load. |
| 140 | |
| 141 | |
| 142 | Note that incoming packets on NFS transports will be dealt with in |
| 143 | one of three ways. An nfsd thread can be woken (threads-woken counts |
| 144 | this case), or the transport can be enqueued for later attention |
| 145 | (sockets-enqueued counts this case), or the packet can be temporarily |
| 146 | deferred because the transport is currently being used by an nfsd |
| 147 | thread. This last case is not very interesting and is not explicitly |
| 148 | counted, but can be inferred from the other counters thus: |
| 149 | |
| 150 | packets-deferred = packets-arrived - ( sockets-enqueued + threads-woken ) |
| 151 | |
| 152 | |
| 153 | More |
| 154 | ---- |
| 155 | Descriptions of the other statistics file should go here. |
| 156 | |
| 157 | |
| 158 | Greg Banks <gnb@sgi.com> |
| 159 | 26 Mar 2009 |