Tom Zanussi | e88d78f | 2006-08-27 01:23:47 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 1 | relay interface (formerly relayfs) |
| 2 | ================================== |
| 3 | |
| 4 | The relay interface provides a means for kernel applications to |
| 5 | efficiently log and transfer large quantities of data from the kernel |
| 6 | to userspace via user-defined 'relay channels'. |
| 7 | |
| 8 | A 'relay channel' is a kernel->user data relay mechanism implemented |
| 9 | as a set of per-cpu kernel buffers ('channel buffers'), each |
| 10 | represented as a regular file ('relay file') in user space. Kernel |
| 11 | clients write into the channel buffers using efficient write |
| 12 | functions; these automatically log into the current cpu's channel |
| 13 | buffer. User space applications mmap() or read() from the relay files |
| 14 | and retrieve the data as it becomes available. The relay files |
| 15 | themselves are files created in a host filesystem, e.g. debugfs, and |
| 16 | are associated with the channel buffers using the API described below. |
| 17 | |
| 18 | The format of the data logged into the channel buffers is completely |
| 19 | up to the kernel client; the relay interface does however provide |
| 20 | hooks which allow kernel clients to impose some structure on the |
| 21 | buffer data. The relay interface doesn't implement any form of data |
| 22 | filtering - this also is left to the kernel client. The purpose is to |
| 23 | keep things as simple as possible. |
| 24 | |
| 25 | This document provides an overview of the relay interface API. The |
| 26 | details of the function parameters are documented along with the |
| 27 | functions in the relay interface code - please see that for details. |
| 28 | |
| 29 | Semantics |
| 30 | ========= |
| 31 | |
| 32 | Each relay channel has one buffer per CPU, each buffer has one or more |
| 33 | sub-buffers. Messages are written to the first sub-buffer until it is |
| 34 | too full to contain a new message, in which case it it is written to |
| 35 | the next (if available). Messages are never split across sub-buffers. |
| 36 | At this point, userspace can be notified so it empties the first |
| 37 | sub-buffer, while the kernel continues writing to the next. |
| 38 | |
| 39 | When notified that a sub-buffer is full, the kernel knows how many |
| 40 | bytes of it are padding i.e. unused space occurring because a complete |
| 41 | message couldn't fit into a sub-buffer. Userspace can use this |
| 42 | knowledge to copy only valid data. |
| 43 | |
| 44 | After copying it, userspace can notify the kernel that a sub-buffer |
| 45 | has been consumed. |
| 46 | |
| 47 | A relay channel can operate in a mode where it will overwrite data not |
| 48 | yet collected by userspace, and not wait for it to be consumed. |
| 49 | |
| 50 | The relay channel itself does not provide for communication of such |
| 51 | data between userspace and kernel, allowing the kernel side to remain |
| 52 | simple and not impose a single interface on userspace. It does |
| 53 | provide a set of examples and a separate helper though, described |
| 54 | below. |
| 55 | |
| 56 | The read() interface both removes padding and internally consumes the |
| 57 | read sub-buffers; thus in cases where read(2) is being used to drain |
| 58 | the channel buffers, special-purpose communication between kernel and |
| 59 | user isn't necessary for basic operation. |
| 60 | |
| 61 | One of the major goals of the relay interface is to provide a low |
| 62 | overhead mechanism for conveying kernel data to userspace. While the |
| 63 | read() interface is easy to use, it's not as efficient as the mmap() |
| 64 | approach; the example code attempts to make the tradeoff between the |
| 65 | two approaches as small as possible. |
| 66 | |
| 67 | klog and relay-apps example code |
| 68 | ================================ |
| 69 | |
| 70 | The relay interface itself is ready to use, but to make things easier, |
| 71 | a couple simple utility functions and a set of examples are provided. |
| 72 | |
| 73 | The relay-apps example tarball, available on the relay sourceforge |
| 74 | site, contains a set of self-contained examples, each consisting of a |
| 75 | pair of .c files containing boilerplate code for each of the user and |
| 76 | kernel sides of a relay application. When combined these two sets of |
| 77 | boilerplate code provide glue to easily stream data to disk, without |
| 78 | having to bother with mundane housekeeping chores. |
| 79 | |
| 80 | The 'klog debugging functions' patch (klog.patch in the relay-apps |
| 81 | tarball) provides a couple of high-level logging functions to the |
| 82 | kernel which allow writing formatted text or raw data to a channel, |
| 83 | regardless of whether a channel to write into exists or not, or even |
| 84 | whether the relay interface is compiled into the kernel or not. These |
| 85 | functions allow you to put unconditional 'trace' statements anywhere |
| 86 | in the kernel or kernel modules; only when there is a 'klog handler' |
| 87 | registered will data actually be logged (see the klog and kleak |
| 88 | examples for details). |
| 89 | |
| 90 | It is of course possible to use the relay interface from scratch, |
| 91 | i.e. without using any of the relay-apps example code or klog, but |
| 92 | you'll have to implement communication between userspace and kernel, |
| 93 | allowing both to convey the state of buffers (full, empty, amount of |
| 94 | padding). The read() interface both removes padding and internally |
| 95 | consumes the read sub-buffers; thus in cases where read(2) is being |
| 96 | used to drain the channel buffers, special-purpose communication |
| 97 | between kernel and user isn't necessary for basic operation. Things |
| 98 | such as buffer-full conditions would still need to be communicated via |
| 99 | some channel though. |
| 100 | |
| 101 | klog and the relay-apps examples can be found in the relay-apps |
| 102 | tarball on http://relayfs.sourceforge.net |
| 103 | |
| 104 | The relay interface user space API |
| 105 | ================================== |
| 106 | |
| 107 | The relay interface implements basic file operations for user space |
| 108 | access to relay channel buffer data. Here are the file operations |
| 109 | that are available and some comments regarding their behavior: |
| 110 | |
| 111 | open() enables user to open an _existing_ channel buffer. |
| 112 | |
| 113 | mmap() results in channel buffer being mapped into the caller's |
| 114 | memory space. Note that you can't do a partial mmap - you |
| 115 | must map the entire file, which is NRBUF * SUBBUFSIZE. |
| 116 | |
| 117 | read() read the contents of a channel buffer. The bytes read are |
| 118 | 'consumed' by the reader, i.e. they won't be available |
| 119 | again to subsequent reads. If the channel is being used |
| 120 | in no-overwrite mode (the default), it can be read at any |
| 121 | time even if there's an active kernel writer. If the |
| 122 | channel is being used in overwrite mode and there are |
| 123 | active channel writers, results may be unpredictable - |
| 124 | users should make sure that all logging to the channel has |
| 125 | ended before using read() with overwrite mode. Sub-buffer |
| 126 | padding is automatically removed and will not be seen by |
| 127 | the reader. |
| 128 | |
| 129 | sendfile() transfer data from a channel buffer to an output file |
| 130 | descriptor. Sub-buffer padding is automatically removed |
| 131 | and will not be seen by the reader. |
| 132 | |
| 133 | poll() POLLIN/POLLRDNORM/POLLERR supported. User applications are |
| 134 | notified when sub-buffer boundaries are crossed. |
| 135 | |
| 136 | close() decrements the channel buffer's refcount. When the refcount |
| 137 | reaches 0, i.e. when no process or kernel client has the |
| 138 | buffer open, the channel buffer is freed. |
| 139 | |
| 140 | In order for a user application to make use of relay files, the |
| 141 | host filesystem must be mounted. For example, |
| 142 | |
Randy Dunlap | 254012f | 2008-02-03 16:30:51 +0200 | [diff] [blame] | 143 | mount -t debugfs debugfs /sys/kernel/debug |
Tom Zanussi | e88d78f | 2006-08-27 01:23:47 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 144 | |
| 145 | NOTE: the host filesystem doesn't need to be mounted for kernel |
| 146 | clients to create or use channels - it only needs to be |
| 147 | mounted when user space applications need access to the buffer |
| 148 | data. |
| 149 | |
| 150 | |
| 151 | The relay interface kernel API |
| 152 | ============================== |
| 153 | |
| 154 | Here's a summary of the API the relay interface provides to in-kernel clients: |
| 155 | |
| 156 | TBD(curr. line MT:/API/) |
| 157 | channel management functions: |
| 158 | |
| 159 | relay_open(base_filename, parent, subbuf_size, n_subbufs, |
Mathieu Desnoyers | 23c8875 | 2007-02-10 01:45:05 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 160 | callbacks, private_data) |
Tom Zanussi | e88d78f | 2006-08-27 01:23:47 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 161 | relay_close(chan) |
| 162 | relay_flush(chan) |
| 163 | relay_reset(chan) |
| 164 | |
| 165 | channel management typically called on instigation of userspace: |
| 166 | |
| 167 | relay_subbufs_consumed(chan, cpu, subbufs_consumed) |
| 168 | |
| 169 | write functions: |
| 170 | |
| 171 | relay_write(chan, data, length) |
| 172 | __relay_write(chan, data, length) |
| 173 | relay_reserve(chan, length) |
| 174 | |
| 175 | callbacks: |
| 176 | |
| 177 | subbuf_start(buf, subbuf, prev_subbuf, prev_padding) |
| 178 | buf_mapped(buf, filp) |
| 179 | buf_unmapped(buf, filp) |
| 180 | create_buf_file(filename, parent, mode, buf, is_global) |
| 181 | remove_buf_file(dentry) |
| 182 | |
| 183 | helper functions: |
| 184 | |
| 185 | relay_buf_full(buf) |
| 186 | subbuf_start_reserve(buf, length) |
| 187 | |
| 188 | |
| 189 | Creating a channel |
| 190 | ------------------ |
| 191 | |
| 192 | relay_open() is used to create a channel, along with its per-cpu |
| 193 | channel buffers. Each channel buffer will have an associated file |
| 194 | created for it in the host filesystem, which can be and mmapped or |
| 195 | read from in user space. The files are named basename0...basenameN-1 |
| 196 | where N is the number of online cpus, and by default will be created |
| 197 | in the root of the filesystem (if the parent param is NULL). If you |
| 198 | want a directory structure to contain your relay files, you should |
| 199 | create it using the host filesystem's directory creation function, |
| 200 | e.g. debugfs_create_dir(), and pass the parent directory to |
| 201 | relay_open(). Users are responsible for cleaning up any directory |
| 202 | structure they create, when the channel is closed - again the host |
| 203 | filesystem's directory removal functions should be used for that, |
| 204 | e.g. debugfs_remove(). |
| 205 | |
| 206 | In order for a channel to be created and the host filesystem's files |
| 207 | associated with its channel buffers, the user must provide definitions |
| 208 | for two callback functions, create_buf_file() and remove_buf_file(). |
| 209 | create_buf_file() is called once for each per-cpu buffer from |
| 210 | relay_open() and allows the user to create the file which will be used |
| 211 | to represent the corresponding channel buffer. The callback should |
| 212 | return the dentry of the file created to represent the channel buffer. |
| 213 | remove_buf_file() must also be defined; it's responsible for deleting |
| 214 | the file(s) created in create_buf_file() and is called during |
| 215 | relay_close(). |
| 216 | |
| 217 | Here are some typical definitions for these callbacks, in this case |
| 218 | using debugfs: |
| 219 | |
| 220 | /* |
| 221 | * create_buf_file() callback. Creates relay file in debugfs. |
| 222 | */ |
| 223 | static struct dentry *create_buf_file_handler(const char *filename, |
| 224 | struct dentry *parent, |
| 225 | int mode, |
| 226 | struct rchan_buf *buf, |
| 227 | int *is_global) |
| 228 | { |
| 229 | return debugfs_create_file(filename, mode, parent, buf, |
| 230 | &relay_file_operations); |
| 231 | } |
| 232 | |
| 233 | /* |
| 234 | * remove_buf_file() callback. Removes relay file from debugfs. |
| 235 | */ |
| 236 | static int remove_buf_file_handler(struct dentry *dentry) |
| 237 | { |
| 238 | debugfs_remove(dentry); |
| 239 | |
| 240 | return 0; |
| 241 | } |
| 242 | |
| 243 | /* |
| 244 | * relay interface callbacks |
| 245 | */ |
| 246 | static struct rchan_callbacks relay_callbacks = |
| 247 | { |
| 248 | .create_buf_file = create_buf_file_handler, |
| 249 | .remove_buf_file = remove_buf_file_handler, |
| 250 | }; |
| 251 | |
| 252 | And an example relay_open() invocation using them: |
| 253 | |
Mathieu Desnoyers | 23c8875 | 2007-02-10 01:45:05 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 254 | chan = relay_open("cpu", NULL, SUBBUF_SIZE, N_SUBBUFS, &relay_callbacks, NULL); |
Tom Zanussi | e88d78f | 2006-08-27 01:23:47 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 255 | |
| 256 | If the create_buf_file() callback fails, or isn't defined, channel |
| 257 | creation and thus relay_open() will fail. |
| 258 | |
| 259 | The total size of each per-cpu buffer is calculated by multiplying the |
| 260 | number of sub-buffers by the sub-buffer size passed into relay_open(). |
| 261 | The idea behind sub-buffers is that they're basically an extension of |
| 262 | double-buffering to N buffers, and they also allow applications to |
| 263 | easily implement random-access-on-buffer-boundary schemes, which can |
| 264 | be important for some high-volume applications. The number and size |
| 265 | of sub-buffers is completely dependent on the application and even for |
| 266 | the same application, different conditions will warrant different |
| 267 | values for these parameters at different times. Typically, the right |
| 268 | values to use are best decided after some experimentation; in general, |
| 269 | though, it's safe to assume that having only 1 sub-buffer is a bad |
| 270 | idea - you're guaranteed to either overwrite data or lose events |
| 271 | depending on the channel mode being used. |
| 272 | |
| 273 | The create_buf_file() implementation can also be defined in such a way |
| 274 | as to allow the creation of a single 'global' buffer instead of the |
| 275 | default per-cpu set. This can be useful for applications interested |
| 276 | mainly in seeing the relative ordering of system-wide events without |
| 277 | the need to bother with saving explicit timestamps for the purpose of |
| 278 | merging/sorting per-cpu files in a postprocessing step. |
| 279 | |
| 280 | To have relay_open() create a global buffer, the create_buf_file() |
| 281 | implementation should set the value of the is_global outparam to a |
| 282 | non-zero value in addition to creating the file that will be used to |
| 283 | represent the single buffer. In the case of a global buffer, |
| 284 | create_buf_file() and remove_buf_file() will be called only once. The |
| 285 | normal channel-writing functions, e.g. relay_write(), can still be |
| 286 | used - writes from any cpu will transparently end up in the global |
| 287 | buffer - but since it is a global buffer, callers should make sure |
| 288 | they use the proper locking for such a buffer, either by wrapping |
| 289 | writes in a spinlock, or by copying a write function from relay.h and |
| 290 | creating a local version that internally does the proper locking. |
| 291 | |
Mathieu Desnoyers | 23c8875 | 2007-02-10 01:45:05 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 292 | The private_data passed into relay_open() allows clients to associate |
| 293 | user-defined data with a channel, and is immediately available |
| 294 | (including in create_buf_file()) via chan->private_data or |
| 295 | buf->chan->private_data. |
| 296 | |
Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu | 20d8b67 | 2008-07-25 19:45:12 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 297 | Buffer-only channels |
| 298 | -------------------- |
| 299 | |
| 300 | These channels have no files associated and can be created with |
| 301 | relay_open(NULL, NULL, ...). Such channels are useful in scenarios such |
| 302 | as when doing early tracing in the kernel, before the VFS is up. In these |
| 303 | cases, one may open a buffer-only channel and then call |
| 304 | relay_late_setup_files() when the kernel is ready to handle files, |
| 305 | to expose the buffered data to the userspace. |
| 306 | |
Tom Zanussi | e88d78f | 2006-08-27 01:23:47 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 307 | Channel 'modes' |
| 308 | --------------- |
| 309 | |
| 310 | relay channels can be used in either of two modes - 'overwrite' or |
| 311 | 'no-overwrite'. The mode is entirely determined by the implementation |
| 312 | of the subbuf_start() callback, as described below. The default if no |
| 313 | subbuf_start() callback is defined is 'no-overwrite' mode. If the |
| 314 | default mode suits your needs, and you plan to use the read() |
| 315 | interface to retrieve channel data, you can ignore the details of this |
| 316 | section, as it pertains mainly to mmap() implementations. |
| 317 | |
| 318 | In 'overwrite' mode, also known as 'flight recorder' mode, writes |
| 319 | continuously cycle around the buffer and will never fail, but will |
| 320 | unconditionally overwrite old data regardless of whether it's actually |
| 321 | been consumed. In no-overwrite mode, writes will fail, i.e. data will |
| 322 | be lost, if the number of unconsumed sub-buffers equals the total |
| 323 | number of sub-buffers in the channel. It should be clear that if |
| 324 | there is no consumer or if the consumer can't consume sub-buffers fast |
| 325 | enough, data will be lost in either case; the only difference is |
| 326 | whether data is lost from the beginning or the end of a buffer. |
| 327 | |
| 328 | As explained above, a relay channel is made of up one or more |
| 329 | per-cpu channel buffers, each implemented as a circular buffer |
| 330 | subdivided into one or more sub-buffers. Messages are written into |
| 331 | the current sub-buffer of the channel's current per-cpu buffer via the |
| 332 | write functions described below. Whenever a message can't fit into |
| 333 | the current sub-buffer, because there's no room left for it, the |
| 334 | client is notified via the subbuf_start() callback that a switch to a |
| 335 | new sub-buffer is about to occur. The client uses this callback to 1) |
| 336 | initialize the next sub-buffer if appropriate 2) finalize the previous |
| 337 | sub-buffer if appropriate and 3) return a boolean value indicating |
| 338 | whether or not to actually move on to the next sub-buffer. |
| 339 | |
| 340 | To implement 'no-overwrite' mode, the userspace client would provide |
| 341 | an implementation of the subbuf_start() callback something like the |
| 342 | following: |
| 343 | |
| 344 | static int subbuf_start(struct rchan_buf *buf, |
| 345 | void *subbuf, |
| 346 | void *prev_subbuf, |
| 347 | unsigned int prev_padding) |
| 348 | { |
| 349 | if (prev_subbuf) |
| 350 | *((unsigned *)prev_subbuf) = prev_padding; |
| 351 | |
| 352 | if (relay_buf_full(buf)) |
| 353 | return 0; |
| 354 | |
| 355 | subbuf_start_reserve(buf, sizeof(unsigned int)); |
| 356 | |
| 357 | return 1; |
| 358 | } |
| 359 | |
| 360 | If the current buffer is full, i.e. all sub-buffers remain unconsumed, |
| 361 | the callback returns 0 to indicate that the buffer switch should not |
| 362 | occur yet, i.e. until the consumer has had a chance to read the |
| 363 | current set of ready sub-buffers. For the relay_buf_full() function |
Matt LaPlante | a982ac0 | 2007-05-09 07:35:06 +0200 | [diff] [blame] | 364 | to make sense, the consumer is responsible for notifying the relay |
Tom Zanussi | e88d78f | 2006-08-27 01:23:47 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 365 | interface when sub-buffers have been consumed via |
| 366 | relay_subbufs_consumed(). Any subsequent attempts to write into the |
| 367 | buffer will again invoke the subbuf_start() callback with the same |
| 368 | parameters; only when the consumer has consumed one or more of the |
| 369 | ready sub-buffers will relay_buf_full() return 0, in which case the |
| 370 | buffer switch can continue. |
| 371 | |
| 372 | The implementation of the subbuf_start() callback for 'overwrite' mode |
| 373 | would be very similar: |
| 374 | |
| 375 | static int subbuf_start(struct rchan_buf *buf, |
| 376 | void *subbuf, |
| 377 | void *prev_subbuf, |
| 378 | unsigned int prev_padding) |
| 379 | { |
| 380 | if (prev_subbuf) |
| 381 | *((unsigned *)prev_subbuf) = prev_padding; |
| 382 | |
| 383 | subbuf_start_reserve(buf, sizeof(unsigned int)); |
| 384 | |
| 385 | return 1; |
| 386 | } |
| 387 | |
| 388 | In this case, the relay_buf_full() check is meaningless and the |
| 389 | callback always returns 1, causing the buffer switch to occur |
| 390 | unconditionally. It's also meaningless for the client to use the |
| 391 | relay_subbufs_consumed() function in this mode, as it's never |
| 392 | consulted. |
| 393 | |
| 394 | The default subbuf_start() implementation, used if the client doesn't |
| 395 | define any callbacks, or doesn't define the subbuf_start() callback, |
| 396 | implements the simplest possible 'no-overwrite' mode, i.e. it does |
| 397 | nothing but return 0. |
| 398 | |
| 399 | Header information can be reserved at the beginning of each sub-buffer |
| 400 | by calling the subbuf_start_reserve() helper function from within the |
| 401 | subbuf_start() callback. This reserved area can be used to store |
| 402 | whatever information the client wants. In the example above, room is |
| 403 | reserved in each sub-buffer to store the padding count for that |
| 404 | sub-buffer. This is filled in for the previous sub-buffer in the |
| 405 | subbuf_start() implementation; the padding value for the previous |
| 406 | sub-buffer is passed into the subbuf_start() callback along with a |
| 407 | pointer to the previous sub-buffer, since the padding value isn't |
| 408 | known until a sub-buffer is filled. The subbuf_start() callback is |
| 409 | also called for the first sub-buffer when the channel is opened, to |
| 410 | give the client a chance to reserve space in it. In this case the |
| 411 | previous sub-buffer pointer passed into the callback will be NULL, so |
| 412 | the client should check the value of the prev_subbuf pointer before |
| 413 | writing into the previous sub-buffer. |
| 414 | |
| 415 | Writing to a channel |
| 416 | -------------------- |
| 417 | |
| 418 | Kernel clients write data into the current cpu's channel buffer using |
| 419 | relay_write() or __relay_write(). relay_write() is the main logging |
| 420 | function - it uses local_irqsave() to protect the buffer and should be |
| 421 | used if you might be logging from interrupt context. If you know |
| 422 | you'll never be logging from interrupt context, you can use |
| 423 | __relay_write(), which only disables preemption. These functions |
| 424 | don't return a value, so you can't determine whether or not they |
| 425 | failed - the assumption is that you wouldn't want to check a return |
| 426 | value in the fast logging path anyway, and that they'll always succeed |
| 427 | unless the buffer is full and no-overwrite mode is being used, in |
| 428 | which case you can detect a failed write in the subbuf_start() |
| 429 | callback by calling the relay_buf_full() helper function. |
| 430 | |
| 431 | relay_reserve() is used to reserve a slot in a channel buffer which |
| 432 | can be written to later. This would typically be used in applications |
| 433 | that need to write directly into a channel buffer without having to |
| 434 | stage data in a temporary buffer beforehand. Because the actual write |
| 435 | may not happen immediately after the slot is reserved, applications |
| 436 | using relay_reserve() can keep a count of the number of bytes actually |
| 437 | written, either in space reserved in the sub-buffers themselves or as |
| 438 | a separate array. See the 'reserve' example in the relay-apps tarball |
| 439 | at http://relayfs.sourceforge.net for an example of how this can be |
| 440 | done. Because the write is under control of the client and is |
| 441 | separated from the reserve, relay_reserve() doesn't protect the buffer |
| 442 | at all - it's up to the client to provide the appropriate |
| 443 | synchronization when using relay_reserve(). |
| 444 | |
| 445 | Closing a channel |
| 446 | ----------------- |
| 447 | |
| 448 | The client calls relay_close() when it's finished using the channel. |
| 449 | The channel and its associated buffers are destroyed when there are no |
| 450 | longer any references to any of the channel buffers. relay_flush() |
| 451 | forces a sub-buffer switch on all the channel buffers, and can be used |
| 452 | to finalize and process the last sub-buffers before the channel is |
| 453 | closed. |
| 454 | |
| 455 | Misc |
| 456 | ---- |
| 457 | |
| 458 | Some applications may want to keep a channel around and re-use it |
| 459 | rather than open and close a new channel for each use. relay_reset() |
| 460 | can be used for this purpose - it resets a channel to its initial |
| 461 | state without reallocating channel buffer memory or destroying |
| 462 | existing mappings. It should however only be called when it's safe to |
| 463 | do so, i.e. when the channel isn't currently being written to. |
| 464 | |
| 465 | Finally, there are a couple of utility callbacks that can be used for |
| 466 | different purposes. buf_mapped() is called whenever a channel buffer |
| 467 | is mmapped from user space and buf_unmapped() is called when it's |
| 468 | unmapped. The client can use this notification to trigger actions |
| 469 | within the kernel application, such as enabling/disabling logging to |
| 470 | the channel. |
| 471 | |
| 472 | |
| 473 | Resources |
| 474 | ========= |
| 475 | |
| 476 | For news, example code, mailing list, etc. see the relay interface homepage: |
| 477 | |
| 478 | http://relayfs.sourceforge.net |
| 479 | |
| 480 | |
| 481 | Credits |
| 482 | ======= |
| 483 | |
| 484 | The ideas and specs for the relay interface came about as a result of |
| 485 | discussions on tracing involving the following: |
| 486 | |
| 487 | Michel Dagenais <michel.dagenais@polymtl.ca> |
| 488 | Richard Moore <richardj_moore@uk.ibm.com> |
| 489 | Bob Wisniewski <bob@watson.ibm.com> |
| 490 | Karim Yaghmour <karim@opersys.com> |
| 491 | Tom Zanussi <zanussi@us.ibm.com> |
| 492 | |
| 493 | Also thanks to Hubertus Franke for a lot of useful suggestions and bug |
| 494 | reports. |