Mika Westerberg | 59c3987 | 2012-12-07 23:11:51 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 1 | ACPI based device enumeration |
| 2 | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| 3 | ACPI 5 introduced a set of new resources (UartTSerialBus, I2cSerialBus, |
| 4 | SpiSerialBus, GpioIo and GpioInt) which can be used in enumerating slave |
| 5 | devices behind serial bus controllers. |
| 6 | |
| 7 | In addition we are starting to see peripherals integrated in the |
| 8 | SoC/Chipset to appear only in ACPI namespace. These are typically devices |
| 9 | that are accessed through memory-mapped registers. |
| 10 | |
| 11 | In order to support this and re-use the existing drivers as much as |
| 12 | possible we decided to do following: |
| 13 | |
| 14 | o Devices that have no bus connector resource are represented as |
| 15 | platform devices. |
| 16 | |
| 17 | o Devices behind real busses where there is a connector resource |
| 18 | are represented as struct spi_device or struct i2c_device |
| 19 | (standard UARTs are not busses so there is no struct uart_device). |
| 20 | |
| 21 | As both ACPI and Device Tree represent a tree of devices (and their |
| 22 | resources) this implementation follows the Device Tree way as much as |
| 23 | possible. |
| 24 | |
| 25 | The ACPI implementation enumerates devices behind busses (platform, SPI and |
| 26 | I2C), creates the physical devices and binds them to their ACPI handle in |
| 27 | the ACPI namespace. |
| 28 | |
| 29 | This means that when ACPI_HANDLE(dev) returns non-NULL the device was |
| 30 | enumerated from ACPI namespace. This handle can be used to extract other |
| 31 | device-specific configuration. There is an example of this below. |
| 32 | |
| 33 | Platform bus support |
| 34 | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| 35 | Since we are using platform devices to represent devices that are not |
| 36 | connected to any physical bus we only need to implement a platform driver |
| 37 | for the device and add supported ACPI IDs. If this same IP-block is used on |
| 38 | some other non-ACPI platform, the driver might work out of the box or needs |
| 39 | some minor changes. |
| 40 | |
| 41 | Adding ACPI support for an existing driver should be pretty |
| 42 | straightforward. Here is the simplest example: |
| 43 | |
| 44 | #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI |
| 45 | static struct acpi_device_id mydrv_acpi_match[] = { |
| 46 | /* ACPI IDs here */ |
| 47 | { } |
| 48 | }; |
| 49 | MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, mydrv_acpi_match); |
| 50 | #endif |
| 51 | |
| 52 | static struct platform_driver my_driver = { |
| 53 | ... |
| 54 | .driver = { |
| 55 | .acpi_match_table = ACPI_PTR(mydrv_acpi_match), |
| 56 | }, |
| 57 | }; |
| 58 | |
| 59 | If the driver needs to perform more complex initialization like getting and |
| 60 | configuring GPIOs it can get its ACPI handle and extract this information |
| 61 | from ACPI tables. |
| 62 | |
| 63 | Currently the kernel is not able to automatically determine from which ACPI |
| 64 | device it should make the corresponding platform device so we need to add |
| 65 | the ACPI device explicitly to acpi_platform_device_ids list defined in |
Mika Westerberg | e253673 | 2013-02-09 00:00:13 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 66 | drivers/acpi/acpi_platform.c. This limitation is only for the platform |
| 67 | devices, SPI and I2C devices are created automatically as described below. |
Mika Westerberg | 59c3987 | 2012-12-07 23:11:51 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 68 | |
Andy Shevchenko | 1b2e98b | 2013-04-09 14:05:43 +0300 | [diff] [blame] | 69 | DMA support |
| 70 | ~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| 71 | DMA controllers enumerated via ACPI should be registered in the system to |
| 72 | provide generic access to their resources. For example, a driver that would |
| 73 | like to be accessible to slave devices via generic API call |
| 74 | dma_request_slave_channel() must register itself at the end of the probe |
| 75 | function like this: |
| 76 | |
| 77 | err = devm_acpi_dma_controller_register(dev, xlate_func, dw); |
| 78 | /* Handle the error if it's not a case of !CONFIG_ACPI */ |
| 79 | |
| 80 | and implement custom xlate function if needed (usually acpi_dma_simple_xlate() |
| 81 | is enough) which converts the FixedDMA resource provided by struct |
| 82 | acpi_dma_spec into the corresponding DMA channel. A piece of code for that case |
| 83 | could look like: |
| 84 | |
| 85 | #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI |
| 86 | struct filter_args { |
| 87 | /* Provide necessary information for the filter_func */ |
| 88 | ... |
| 89 | }; |
| 90 | |
| 91 | static bool filter_func(struct dma_chan *chan, void *param) |
| 92 | { |
| 93 | /* Choose the proper channel */ |
| 94 | ... |
| 95 | } |
| 96 | |
| 97 | static struct dma_chan *xlate_func(struct acpi_dma_spec *dma_spec, |
| 98 | struct acpi_dma *adma) |
| 99 | { |
| 100 | dma_cap_mask_t cap; |
| 101 | struct filter_args args; |
| 102 | |
| 103 | /* Prepare arguments for filter_func */ |
| 104 | ... |
| 105 | return dma_request_channel(cap, filter_func, &args); |
| 106 | } |
| 107 | #else |
| 108 | static struct dma_chan *xlate_func(struct acpi_dma_spec *dma_spec, |
| 109 | struct acpi_dma *adma) |
| 110 | { |
| 111 | return NULL; |
| 112 | } |
| 113 | #endif |
| 114 | |
| 115 | dma_request_slave_channel() will call xlate_func() for each registered DMA |
| 116 | controller. In the xlate function the proper channel must be chosen based on |
| 117 | information in struct acpi_dma_spec and the properties of the controller |
| 118 | provided by struct acpi_dma. |
| 119 | |
| 120 | Clients must call dma_request_slave_channel() with the string parameter that |
| 121 | corresponds to a specific FixedDMA resource. By default "tx" means the first |
| 122 | entry of the FixedDMA resource array, "rx" means the second entry. The table |
| 123 | below shows a layout: |
| 124 | |
| 125 | Device (I2C0) |
| 126 | { |
| 127 | ... |
| 128 | Method (_CRS, 0, NotSerialized) |
| 129 | { |
| 130 | Name (DBUF, ResourceTemplate () |
| 131 | { |
| 132 | FixedDMA (0x0018, 0x0004, Width32bit, _Y48) |
| 133 | FixedDMA (0x0019, 0x0005, Width32bit, ) |
| 134 | }) |
| 135 | ... |
| 136 | } |
| 137 | } |
| 138 | |
| 139 | So, the FixedDMA with request line 0x0018 is "tx" and next one is "rx" in |
| 140 | this example. |
| 141 | |
| 142 | In robust cases the client unfortunately needs to call |
| 143 | acpi_dma_request_slave_chan_by_index() directly and therefore choose the |
| 144 | specific FixedDMA resource by its index. |
| 145 | |
Mika Westerberg | 59c3987 | 2012-12-07 23:11:51 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 146 | SPI serial bus support |
| 147 | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| 148 | Slave devices behind SPI bus have SpiSerialBus resource attached to them. |
| 149 | This is extracted automatically by the SPI core and the slave devices are |
| 150 | enumerated once spi_register_master() is called by the bus driver. |
| 151 | |
| 152 | Here is what the ACPI namespace for a SPI slave might look like: |
| 153 | |
| 154 | Device (EEP0) |
| 155 | { |
| 156 | Name (_ADR, 1) |
| 157 | Name (_CID, Package() { |
| 158 | "ATML0025", |
| 159 | "AT25", |
| 160 | }) |
| 161 | ... |
| 162 | Method (_CRS, 0, NotSerialized) |
| 163 | { |
| 164 | SPISerialBus(1, PolarityLow, FourWireMode, 8, |
| 165 | ControllerInitiated, 1000000, ClockPolarityLow, |
| 166 | ClockPhaseFirst, "\\_SB.PCI0.SPI1",) |
| 167 | } |
| 168 | ... |
| 169 | |
| 170 | The SPI device drivers only need to add ACPI IDs in a similar way than with |
| 171 | the platform device drivers. Below is an example where we add ACPI support |
| 172 | to at25 SPI eeprom driver (this is meant for the above ACPI snippet): |
| 173 | |
| 174 | #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI |
| 175 | static struct acpi_device_id at25_acpi_match[] = { |
| 176 | { "AT25", 0 }, |
| 177 | { }, |
| 178 | }; |
| 179 | MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, at25_acpi_match); |
| 180 | #endif |
| 181 | |
| 182 | static struct spi_driver at25_driver = { |
| 183 | .driver = { |
| 184 | ... |
| 185 | .acpi_match_table = ACPI_PTR(at25_acpi_match), |
| 186 | }, |
| 187 | }; |
| 188 | |
| 189 | Note that this driver actually needs more information like page size of the |
| 190 | eeprom etc. but at the time writing this there is no standard way of |
| 191 | passing those. One idea is to return this in _DSM method like: |
| 192 | |
| 193 | Device (EEP0) |
| 194 | { |
| 195 | ... |
| 196 | Method (_DSM, 4, NotSerialized) |
| 197 | { |
| 198 | Store (Package (6) |
| 199 | { |
| 200 | "byte-len", 1024, |
| 201 | "addr-mode", 2, |
| 202 | "page-size, 32 |
| 203 | }, Local0) |
| 204 | |
| 205 | // Check UUIDs etc. |
| 206 | |
| 207 | Return (Local0) |
| 208 | } |
| 209 | |
Stefan Huber | 2d6674b | 2013-06-27 12:54:52 +0200 | [diff] [blame] | 210 | Then the at25 SPI driver can get this configuration by calling _DSM on its |
Mika Westerberg | 59c3987 | 2012-12-07 23:11:51 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 211 | ACPI handle like: |
| 212 | |
| 213 | struct acpi_buffer output = { ACPI_ALLOCATE_BUFFER, NULL }; |
| 214 | struct acpi_object_list input; |
| 215 | acpi_status status; |
| 216 | |
| 217 | /* Fill in the input buffer */ |
| 218 | |
| 219 | status = acpi_evaluate_object(ACPI_HANDLE(&spi->dev), "_DSM", |
| 220 | &input, &output); |
| 221 | if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) |
| 222 | /* Handle the error */ |
| 223 | |
| 224 | /* Extract the data here */ |
| 225 | |
| 226 | kfree(output.pointer); |
| 227 | |
| 228 | I2C serial bus support |
| 229 | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| 230 | The slaves behind I2C bus controller only need to add the ACPI IDs like |
Mika Westerberg | 55e71ed | 2013-08-21 17:28:23 +0300 | [diff] [blame] | 231 | with the platform and SPI drivers. The I2C core automatically enumerates |
| 232 | any slave devices behind the controller device once the adapter is |
| 233 | registered. |
Mika Westerberg | 59c3987 | 2012-12-07 23:11:51 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 234 | |
| 235 | Below is an example of how to add ACPI support to the existing mpu3050 |
| 236 | input driver: |
| 237 | |
| 238 | #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI |
| 239 | static struct acpi_device_id mpu3050_acpi_match[] = { |
| 240 | { "MPU3050", 0 }, |
| 241 | { }, |
| 242 | }; |
| 243 | MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, mpu3050_acpi_match); |
| 244 | #endif |
| 245 | |
| 246 | static struct i2c_driver mpu3050_i2c_driver = { |
| 247 | .driver = { |
| 248 | .name = "mpu3050", |
| 249 | .owner = THIS_MODULE, |
| 250 | .pm = &mpu3050_pm, |
| 251 | .of_match_table = mpu3050_of_match, |
| 252 | .acpi_match_table ACPI_PTR(mpu3050_acpi_match), |
| 253 | }, |
| 254 | .probe = mpu3050_probe, |
Greg Kroah-Hartman | 63a29f7 | 2012-12-21 15:15:02 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 255 | .remove = mpu3050_remove, |
Mika Westerberg | 59c3987 | 2012-12-07 23:11:51 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 256 | .id_table = mpu3050_ids, |
| 257 | }; |
| 258 | |
| 259 | GPIO support |
| 260 | ~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| 261 | ACPI 5 introduced two new resources to describe GPIO connections: GpioIo |
| 262 | and GpioInt. These resources are used be used to pass GPIO numbers used by |
| 263 | the device to the driver. For example: |
| 264 | |
| 265 | Method (_CRS, 0, NotSerialized) |
| 266 | { |
| 267 | Name (SBUF, ResourceTemplate() |
| 268 | { |
Mika Westerberg | 12028d2 | 2013-04-03 13:56:54 +0300 | [diff] [blame] | 269 | ... |
| 270 | // Used to power on/off the device |
Mika Westerberg | 59c3987 | 2012-12-07 23:11:51 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 271 | GpioIo (Exclusive, PullDefault, 0x0000, 0x0000, |
| 272 | IoRestrictionOutputOnly, "\\_SB.PCI0.GPI0", |
| 273 | 0x00, ResourceConsumer,,) |
| 274 | { |
| 275 | // Pin List |
| 276 | 0x0055 |
| 277 | } |
Mika Westerberg | 12028d2 | 2013-04-03 13:56:54 +0300 | [diff] [blame] | 278 | |
| 279 | // Interrupt for the device |
| 280 | GpioInt (Edge, ActiveHigh, ExclusiveAndWake, PullNone, |
| 281 | 0x0000, "\\_SB.PCI0.GPI0", 0x00, ResourceConsumer,,) |
| 282 | { |
| 283 | // Pin list |
| 284 | 0x0058 |
| 285 | } |
| 286 | |
Mika Westerberg | 59c3987 | 2012-12-07 23:11:51 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 287 | ... |
| 288 | |
Mika Westerberg | 59c3987 | 2012-12-07 23:11:51 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 289 | } |
Mika Westerberg | 12028d2 | 2013-04-03 13:56:54 +0300 | [diff] [blame] | 290 | |
| 291 | Return (SBUF) |
Mika Westerberg | 59c3987 | 2012-12-07 23:11:51 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 292 | } |
| 293 | |
| 294 | These GPIO numbers are controller relative and path "\\_SB.PCI0.GPI0" |
| 295 | specifies the path to the controller. In order to use these GPIOs in Linux |
Mika Westerberg | ccb6fbb | 2014-01-08 12:40:57 +0200 | [diff] [blame] | 296 | we need to translate them to the corresponding Linux GPIO descriptors. |
Mika Westerberg | 59c3987 | 2012-12-07 23:11:51 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 297 | |
Mika Westerberg | ccb6fbb | 2014-01-08 12:40:57 +0200 | [diff] [blame] | 298 | There is a standard GPIO API for that and is documented in |
Jarkko Nikula | 51caa05 | 2014-05-21 16:58:25 +0300 | [diff] [blame] | 299 | Documentation/gpio/. |
Mika Westerberg | 12028d2 | 2013-04-03 13:56:54 +0300 | [diff] [blame] | 300 | |
Mika Westerberg | ccb6fbb | 2014-01-08 12:40:57 +0200 | [diff] [blame] | 301 | In the above example we can get the corresponding two GPIO descriptors with |
| 302 | a code like this: |
Mika Westerberg | 45f3943 | 2013-10-10 11:01:11 +0300 | [diff] [blame] | 303 | |
| 304 | #include <linux/gpio/consumer.h> |
| 305 | ... |
| 306 | |
| 307 | struct gpio_desc *irq_desc, *power_desc; |
| 308 | |
| 309 | irq_desc = gpiod_get_index(dev, NULL, 1); |
| 310 | if (IS_ERR(irq_desc)) |
| 311 | /* handle error */ |
| 312 | |
| 313 | power_desc = gpiod_get_index(dev, NULL, 0); |
| 314 | if (IS_ERR(power_desc)) |
| 315 | /* handle error */ |
| 316 | |
| 317 | /* Now we can use the GPIO descriptors */ |
| 318 | |
Mika Westerberg | ccb6fbb | 2014-01-08 12:40:57 +0200 | [diff] [blame] | 319 | There are also devm_* versions of these functions which release the |
| 320 | descriptors once the device is released. |