blob: 4cfbe1d1c92021742d3de85b7c77669852163fe1 [file] [log] [blame]
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07001/*
2 * INET An implementation of the TCP/IP protocol suite for the LINUX
3 * operating system. INET is implemented using the BSD Socket
4 * interface as the means of communication with the user level.
5 *
6 * Implementation of the Transmission Control Protocol(TCP).
7 *
8 * Version: $Id: tcp_minisocks.c,v 1.15 2002/02/01 22:01:04 davem Exp $
9 *
Jesper Juhl02c30a82005-05-05 16:16:16 -070010 * Authors: Ross Biro
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -070011 * Fred N. van Kempen, <waltje@uWalt.NL.Mugnet.ORG>
12 * Mark Evans, <evansmp@uhura.aston.ac.uk>
13 * Corey Minyard <wf-rch!minyard@relay.EU.net>
14 * Florian La Roche, <flla@stud.uni-sb.de>
15 * Charles Hedrick, <hedrick@klinzhai.rutgers.edu>
16 * Linus Torvalds, <torvalds@cs.helsinki.fi>
17 * Alan Cox, <gw4pts@gw4pts.ampr.org>
18 * Matthew Dillon, <dillon@apollo.west.oic.com>
19 * Arnt Gulbrandsen, <agulbra@nvg.unit.no>
20 * Jorge Cwik, <jorge@laser.satlink.net>
21 */
22
23#include <linux/config.h>
24#include <linux/mm.h>
25#include <linux/module.h>
26#include <linux/sysctl.h>
27#include <linux/workqueue.h>
28#include <net/tcp.h>
29#include <net/inet_common.h>
30#include <net/xfrm.h>
31
32#ifdef CONFIG_SYSCTL
33#define SYNC_INIT 0 /* let the user enable it */
34#else
35#define SYNC_INIT 1
36#endif
37
38int sysctl_tcp_tw_recycle;
39int sysctl_tcp_max_tw_buckets = NR_FILE*2;
40
41int sysctl_tcp_syncookies = SYNC_INIT;
42int sysctl_tcp_abort_on_overflow;
43
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo8feaf0c02005-08-09 20:09:30 -070044static void tcp_tw_schedule(struct inet_timewait_sock *tw, int timeo);
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -070045
46static __inline__ int tcp_in_window(u32 seq, u32 end_seq, u32 s_win, u32 e_win)
47{
48 if (seq == s_win)
49 return 1;
50 if (after(end_seq, s_win) && before(seq, e_win))
51 return 1;
52 return (seq == e_win && seq == end_seq);
53}
54
55/* New-style handling of TIME_WAIT sockets. */
56
57int tcp_tw_count;
58
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -070059/*
60 * * Main purpose of TIME-WAIT state is to close connection gracefully,
61 * when one of ends sits in LAST-ACK or CLOSING retransmitting FIN
62 * (and, probably, tail of data) and one or more our ACKs are lost.
63 * * What is TIME-WAIT timeout? It is associated with maximal packet
64 * lifetime in the internet, which results in wrong conclusion, that
65 * it is set to catch "old duplicate segments" wandering out of their path.
66 * It is not quite correct. This timeout is calculated so that it exceeds
67 * maximal retransmission timeout enough to allow to lose one (or more)
68 * segments sent by peer and our ACKs. This time may be calculated from RTO.
69 * * When TIME-WAIT socket receives RST, it means that another end
70 * finally closed and we are allowed to kill TIME-WAIT too.
71 * * Second purpose of TIME-WAIT is catching old duplicate segments.
72 * Well, certainly it is pure paranoia, but if we load TIME-WAIT
73 * with this semantics, we MUST NOT kill TIME-WAIT state with RSTs.
74 * * If we invented some more clever way to catch duplicates
75 * (f.e. based on PAWS), we could truncate TIME-WAIT to several RTOs.
76 *
77 * The algorithm below is based on FORMAL INTERPRETATION of RFCs.
78 * When you compare it to RFCs, please, read section SEGMENT ARRIVES
79 * from the very beginning.
80 *
81 * NOTE. With recycling (and later with fin-wait-2) TW bucket
82 * is _not_ stateless. It means, that strictly speaking we must
83 * spinlock it. I do not want! Well, probability of misbehaviour
84 * is ridiculously low and, seems, we could use some mb() tricks
85 * to avoid misread sequence numbers, states etc. --ANK
86 */
87enum tcp_tw_status
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo8feaf0c02005-08-09 20:09:30 -070088tcp_timewait_state_process(struct inet_timewait_sock *tw, struct sk_buff *skb,
89 const struct tcphdr *th)
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -070090{
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo8feaf0c02005-08-09 20:09:30 -070091 struct tcp_timewait_sock *tcptw = tcp_twsk((struct sock *)tw);
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -070092 struct tcp_options_received tmp_opt;
93 int paws_reject = 0;
94
95 tmp_opt.saw_tstamp = 0;
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo8feaf0c02005-08-09 20:09:30 -070096 if (th->doff > (sizeof(*th) >> 2) && tcptw->tw_ts_recent_stamp) {
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -070097 tcp_parse_options(skb, &tmp_opt, 0);
98
99 if (tmp_opt.saw_tstamp) {
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo8feaf0c02005-08-09 20:09:30 -0700100 tmp_opt.ts_recent = tcptw->tw_ts_recent;
101 tmp_opt.ts_recent_stamp = tcptw->tw_ts_recent_stamp;
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700102 paws_reject = tcp_paws_check(&tmp_opt, th->rst);
103 }
104 }
105
106 if (tw->tw_substate == TCP_FIN_WAIT2) {
107 /* Just repeat all the checks of tcp_rcv_state_process() */
108
109 /* Out of window, send ACK */
110 if (paws_reject ||
111 !tcp_in_window(TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->seq, TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->end_seq,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo8feaf0c02005-08-09 20:09:30 -0700112 tcptw->tw_rcv_nxt,
113 tcptw->tw_rcv_nxt + tcptw->tw_rcv_wnd))
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700114 return TCP_TW_ACK;
115
116 if (th->rst)
117 goto kill;
118
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo8feaf0c02005-08-09 20:09:30 -0700119 if (th->syn && !before(TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->seq, tcptw->tw_rcv_nxt))
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700120 goto kill_with_rst;
121
122 /* Dup ACK? */
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo8feaf0c02005-08-09 20:09:30 -0700123 if (!after(TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->end_seq, tcptw->tw_rcv_nxt) ||
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700124 TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->end_seq == TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->seq) {
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo8feaf0c02005-08-09 20:09:30 -0700125 inet_twsk_put(tw);
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700126 return TCP_TW_SUCCESS;
127 }
128
129 /* New data or FIN. If new data arrive after half-duplex close,
130 * reset.
131 */
132 if (!th->fin ||
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo8feaf0c02005-08-09 20:09:30 -0700133 TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->end_seq != tcptw->tw_rcv_nxt + 1) {
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700134kill_with_rst:
135 tcp_tw_deschedule(tw);
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo8feaf0c02005-08-09 20:09:30 -0700136 inet_twsk_put(tw);
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700137 return TCP_TW_RST;
138 }
139
140 /* FIN arrived, enter true time-wait state. */
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo8feaf0c02005-08-09 20:09:30 -0700141 tw->tw_substate = TCP_TIME_WAIT;
142 tcptw->tw_rcv_nxt = TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->end_seq;
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700143 if (tmp_opt.saw_tstamp) {
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo8feaf0c02005-08-09 20:09:30 -0700144 tcptw->tw_ts_recent_stamp = xtime.tv_sec;
145 tcptw->tw_ts_recent = tmp_opt.rcv_tsval;
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700146 }
147
148 /* I am shamed, but failed to make it more elegant.
149 * Yes, it is direct reference to IP, which is impossible
150 * to generalize to IPv6. Taking into account that IPv6
151 * do not undertsnad recycling in any case, it not
152 * a big problem in practice. --ANK */
153 if (tw->tw_family == AF_INET &&
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo8feaf0c02005-08-09 20:09:30 -0700154 sysctl_tcp_tw_recycle && tcptw->tw_ts_recent_stamp &&
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700155 tcp_v4_tw_remember_stamp(tw))
156 tcp_tw_schedule(tw, tw->tw_timeout);
157 else
158 tcp_tw_schedule(tw, TCP_TIMEWAIT_LEN);
159 return TCP_TW_ACK;
160 }
161
162 /*
163 * Now real TIME-WAIT state.
164 *
165 * RFC 1122:
166 * "When a connection is [...] on TIME-WAIT state [...]
167 * [a TCP] MAY accept a new SYN from the remote TCP to
168 * reopen the connection directly, if it:
169 *
170 * (1) assigns its initial sequence number for the new
171 * connection to be larger than the largest sequence
172 * number it used on the previous connection incarnation,
173 * and
174 *
175 * (2) returns to TIME-WAIT state if the SYN turns out
176 * to be an old duplicate".
177 */
178
179 if (!paws_reject &&
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo8feaf0c02005-08-09 20:09:30 -0700180 (TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->seq == tcptw->tw_rcv_nxt &&
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700181 (TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->seq == TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->end_seq || th->rst))) {
182 /* In window segment, it may be only reset or bare ack. */
183
184 if (th->rst) {
185 /* This is TIME_WAIT assasination, in two flavors.
186 * Oh well... nobody has a sufficient solution to this
187 * protocol bug yet.
188 */
189 if (sysctl_tcp_rfc1337 == 0) {
190kill:
191 tcp_tw_deschedule(tw);
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo8feaf0c02005-08-09 20:09:30 -0700192 inet_twsk_put(tw);
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700193 return TCP_TW_SUCCESS;
194 }
195 }
196 tcp_tw_schedule(tw, TCP_TIMEWAIT_LEN);
197
198 if (tmp_opt.saw_tstamp) {
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo8feaf0c02005-08-09 20:09:30 -0700199 tcptw->tw_ts_recent = tmp_opt.rcv_tsval;
200 tcptw->tw_ts_recent_stamp = xtime.tv_sec;
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700201 }
202
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo8feaf0c02005-08-09 20:09:30 -0700203 inet_twsk_put(tw);
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700204 return TCP_TW_SUCCESS;
205 }
206
207 /* Out of window segment.
208
209 All the segments are ACKed immediately.
210
211 The only exception is new SYN. We accept it, if it is
212 not old duplicate and we are not in danger to be killed
213 by delayed old duplicates. RFC check is that it has
214 newer sequence number works at rates <40Mbit/sec.
215 However, if paws works, it is reliable AND even more,
216 we even may relax silly seq space cutoff.
217
218 RED-PEN: we violate main RFC requirement, if this SYN will appear
219 old duplicate (i.e. we receive RST in reply to SYN-ACK),
220 we must return socket to time-wait state. It is not good,
221 but not fatal yet.
222 */
223
224 if (th->syn && !th->rst && !th->ack && !paws_reject &&
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo8feaf0c02005-08-09 20:09:30 -0700225 (after(TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->seq, tcptw->tw_rcv_nxt) ||
226 (tmp_opt.saw_tstamp &&
227 (s32)(tcptw->tw_ts_recent - tmp_opt.rcv_tsval) < 0))) {
228 u32 isn = tcptw->tw_snd_nxt + 65535 + 2;
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700229 if (isn == 0)
230 isn++;
231 TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->when = isn;
232 return TCP_TW_SYN;
233 }
234
235 if (paws_reject)
236 NET_INC_STATS_BH(LINUX_MIB_PAWSESTABREJECTED);
237
238 if(!th->rst) {
239 /* In this case we must reset the TIMEWAIT timer.
240 *
241 * If it is ACKless SYN it may be both old duplicate
242 * and new good SYN with random sequence number <rcv_nxt.
243 * Do not reschedule in the last case.
244 */
245 if (paws_reject || th->ack)
246 tcp_tw_schedule(tw, TCP_TIMEWAIT_LEN);
247
248 /* Send ACK. Note, we do not put the bucket,
249 * it will be released by caller.
250 */
251 return TCP_TW_ACK;
252 }
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo8feaf0c02005-08-09 20:09:30 -0700253 inet_twsk_put(tw);
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700254 return TCP_TW_SUCCESS;
255}
256
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700257/*
258 * Move a socket to time-wait or dead fin-wait-2 state.
259 */
260void tcp_time_wait(struct sock *sk, int state, int timeo)
261{
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo8feaf0c02005-08-09 20:09:30 -0700262 struct inet_timewait_sock *tw = NULL;
263 const struct tcp_sock *tp = tcp_sk(sk);
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700264 int recycle_ok = 0;
265
266 if (sysctl_tcp_tw_recycle && tp->rx_opt.ts_recent_stamp)
267 recycle_ok = tp->af_specific->remember_stamp(sk);
268
269 if (tcp_tw_count < sysctl_tcp_max_tw_buckets)
Arnaldo Carvalho de Meloc6762702005-08-09 20:09:59 -0700270 tw = inet_twsk_alloc(sk, state);
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700271
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo8feaf0c02005-08-09 20:09:30 -0700272 if (tw != NULL) {
273 struct tcp_timewait_sock *tcptw = tcp_twsk((struct sock *)tw);
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo463c84b2005-08-09 20:10:42 -0700274 const struct inet_connection_sock *icsk = inet_csk(sk);
275 const int rto = (icsk->icsk_rto << 2) - (icsk->icsk_rto >> 1);
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo8feaf0c02005-08-09 20:09:30 -0700276
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700277 tw->tw_rcv_wscale = tp->rx_opt.rcv_wscale;
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo8feaf0c02005-08-09 20:09:30 -0700278 tcptw->tw_rcv_nxt = tp->rcv_nxt;
279 tcptw->tw_snd_nxt = tp->snd_nxt;
280 tcptw->tw_rcv_wnd = tcp_receive_window(tp);
281 tcptw->tw_ts_recent = tp->rx_opt.ts_recent;
282 tcptw->tw_ts_recent_stamp = tp->rx_opt.ts_recent_stamp;
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700283
284#if defined(CONFIG_IPV6) || defined(CONFIG_IPV6_MODULE)
285 if (tw->tw_family == PF_INET6) {
286 struct ipv6_pinfo *np = inet6_sk(sk);
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo8feaf0c02005-08-09 20:09:30 -0700287 struct tcp6_timewait_sock *tcp6tw = tcp6_twsk((struct sock *)tw);
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700288
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo8feaf0c02005-08-09 20:09:30 -0700289 ipv6_addr_copy(&tcp6tw->tw_v6_daddr, &np->daddr);
290 ipv6_addr_copy(&tcp6tw->tw_v6_rcv_saddr, &np->rcv_saddr);
291 tw->tw_ipv6only = np->ipv6only;
Arnaldo Carvalho de Meloc6762702005-08-09 20:09:59 -0700292 }
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700293#endif
294 /* Linkage updates. */
Arnaldo Carvalho de Meloe48c4142005-08-09 20:09:46 -0700295 __inet_twsk_hashdance(tw, sk, &tcp_hashinfo);
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700296
297 /* Get the TIME_WAIT timeout firing. */
298 if (timeo < rto)
299 timeo = rto;
300
301 if (recycle_ok) {
302 tw->tw_timeout = rto;
303 } else {
304 tw->tw_timeout = TCP_TIMEWAIT_LEN;
305 if (state == TCP_TIME_WAIT)
306 timeo = TCP_TIMEWAIT_LEN;
307 }
308
309 tcp_tw_schedule(tw, timeo);
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo8feaf0c02005-08-09 20:09:30 -0700310 inet_twsk_put(tw);
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700311 } else {
312 /* Sorry, if we're out of memory, just CLOSE this
313 * socket up. We've got bigger problems than
314 * non-graceful socket closings.
315 */
316 if (net_ratelimit())
317 printk(KERN_INFO "TCP: time wait bucket table overflow\n");
318 }
319
320 tcp_update_metrics(sk);
321 tcp_done(sk);
322}
323
324/* Kill off TIME_WAIT sockets once their lifetime has expired. */
325static int tcp_tw_death_row_slot;
326
327static void tcp_twkill(unsigned long);
328
329/* TIME_WAIT reaping mechanism. */
330#define TCP_TWKILL_SLOTS 8 /* Please keep this a power of 2. */
331#define TCP_TWKILL_PERIOD (TCP_TIMEWAIT_LEN/TCP_TWKILL_SLOTS)
332
333#define TCP_TWKILL_QUOTA 100
334
335static struct hlist_head tcp_tw_death_row[TCP_TWKILL_SLOTS];
336static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(tw_death_lock);
337static struct timer_list tcp_tw_timer = TIMER_INITIALIZER(tcp_twkill, 0, 0);
338static void twkill_work(void *);
339static DECLARE_WORK(tcp_twkill_work, twkill_work, NULL);
340static u32 twkill_thread_slots;
341
342/* Returns non-zero if quota exceeded. */
343static int tcp_do_twkill_work(int slot, unsigned int quota)
344{
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo8feaf0c02005-08-09 20:09:30 -0700345 struct inet_timewait_sock *tw;
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700346 struct hlist_node *node;
347 unsigned int killed;
348 int ret;
349
350 /* NOTE: compare this to previous version where lock
351 * was released after detaching chain. It was racy,
352 * because tw buckets are scheduled in not serialized context
353 * in 2.3 (with netfilter), and with softnet it is common, because
354 * soft irqs are not sequenced.
355 */
356 killed = 0;
357 ret = 0;
358rescan:
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo8feaf0c02005-08-09 20:09:30 -0700359 inet_twsk_for_each_inmate(tw, node, &tcp_tw_death_row[slot]) {
360 __inet_twsk_del_dead_node(tw);
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700361 spin_unlock(&tw_death_lock);
Arnaldo Carvalho de Meloe48c4142005-08-09 20:09:46 -0700362 __inet_twsk_kill(tw, &tcp_hashinfo);
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo8feaf0c02005-08-09 20:09:30 -0700363 inet_twsk_put(tw);
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700364 killed++;
365 spin_lock(&tw_death_lock);
366 if (killed > quota) {
367 ret = 1;
368 break;
369 }
370
371 /* While we dropped tw_death_lock, another cpu may have
372 * killed off the next TW bucket in the list, therefore
373 * do a fresh re-read of the hlist head node with the
374 * lock reacquired. We still use the hlist traversal
375 * macro in order to get the prefetches.
376 */
377 goto rescan;
378 }
379
380 tcp_tw_count -= killed;
381 NET_ADD_STATS_BH(LINUX_MIB_TIMEWAITED, killed);
382
383 return ret;
384}
385
386static void tcp_twkill(unsigned long dummy)
387{
388 int need_timer, ret;
389
390 spin_lock(&tw_death_lock);
391
392 if (tcp_tw_count == 0)
393 goto out;
394
395 need_timer = 0;
396 ret = tcp_do_twkill_work(tcp_tw_death_row_slot, TCP_TWKILL_QUOTA);
397 if (ret) {
398 twkill_thread_slots |= (1 << tcp_tw_death_row_slot);
399 mb();
400 schedule_work(&tcp_twkill_work);
401 need_timer = 1;
402 } else {
403 /* We purged the entire slot, anything left? */
404 if (tcp_tw_count)
405 need_timer = 1;
406 }
407 tcp_tw_death_row_slot =
408 ((tcp_tw_death_row_slot + 1) & (TCP_TWKILL_SLOTS - 1));
409 if (need_timer)
410 mod_timer(&tcp_tw_timer, jiffies + TCP_TWKILL_PERIOD);
411out:
412 spin_unlock(&tw_death_lock);
413}
414
415extern void twkill_slots_invalid(void);
416
417static void twkill_work(void *dummy)
418{
419 int i;
420
421 if ((TCP_TWKILL_SLOTS - 1) > (sizeof(twkill_thread_slots) * 8))
422 twkill_slots_invalid();
423
424 while (twkill_thread_slots) {
425 spin_lock_bh(&tw_death_lock);
426 for (i = 0; i < TCP_TWKILL_SLOTS; i++) {
427 if (!(twkill_thread_slots & (1 << i)))
428 continue;
429
430 while (tcp_do_twkill_work(i, TCP_TWKILL_QUOTA) != 0) {
431 if (need_resched()) {
432 spin_unlock_bh(&tw_death_lock);
433 schedule();
434 spin_lock_bh(&tw_death_lock);
435 }
436 }
437
438 twkill_thread_slots &= ~(1 << i);
439 }
440 spin_unlock_bh(&tw_death_lock);
441 }
442}
443
444/* These are always called from BH context. See callers in
445 * tcp_input.c to verify this.
446 */
447
448/* This is for handling early-kills of TIME_WAIT sockets. */
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo8feaf0c02005-08-09 20:09:30 -0700449void tcp_tw_deschedule(struct inet_timewait_sock *tw)
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700450{
451 spin_lock(&tw_death_lock);
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo8feaf0c02005-08-09 20:09:30 -0700452 if (inet_twsk_del_dead_node(tw)) {
453 inet_twsk_put(tw);
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700454 if (--tcp_tw_count == 0)
455 del_timer(&tcp_tw_timer);
456 }
457 spin_unlock(&tw_death_lock);
Arnaldo Carvalho de Meloe48c4142005-08-09 20:09:46 -0700458 __inet_twsk_kill(tw, &tcp_hashinfo);
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700459}
460
461/* Short-time timewait calendar */
462
463static int tcp_twcal_hand = -1;
464static int tcp_twcal_jiffie;
465static void tcp_twcal_tick(unsigned long);
466static struct timer_list tcp_twcal_timer =
467 TIMER_INITIALIZER(tcp_twcal_tick, 0, 0);
468static struct hlist_head tcp_twcal_row[TCP_TW_RECYCLE_SLOTS];
469
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo8feaf0c02005-08-09 20:09:30 -0700470static void tcp_tw_schedule(struct inet_timewait_sock *tw, const int timeo)
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700471{
472 struct hlist_head *list;
473 int slot;
474
475 /* timeout := RTO * 3.5
476 *
477 * 3.5 = 1+2+0.5 to wait for two retransmits.
478 *
479 * RATIONALE: if FIN arrived and we entered TIME-WAIT state,
480 * our ACK acking that FIN can be lost. If N subsequent retransmitted
481 * FINs (or previous seqments) are lost (probability of such event
482 * is p^(N+1), where p is probability to lose single packet and
483 * time to detect the loss is about RTO*(2^N - 1) with exponential
484 * backoff). Normal timewait length is calculated so, that we
485 * waited at least for one retransmitted FIN (maximal RTO is 120sec).
486 * [ BTW Linux. following BSD, violates this requirement waiting
487 * only for 60sec, we should wait at least for 240 secs.
488 * Well, 240 consumes too much of resources 8)
489 * ]
490 * This interval is not reduced to catch old duplicate and
491 * responces to our wandering segments living for two MSLs.
492 * However, if we use PAWS to detect
493 * old duplicates, we can reduce the interval to bounds required
494 * by RTO, rather than MSL. So, if peer understands PAWS, we
495 * kill tw bucket after 3.5*RTO (it is important that this number
496 * is greater than TS tick!) and detect old duplicates with help
497 * of PAWS.
498 */
499 slot = (timeo + (1<<TCP_TW_RECYCLE_TICK) - 1) >> TCP_TW_RECYCLE_TICK;
500
501 spin_lock(&tw_death_lock);
502
503 /* Unlink it, if it was scheduled */
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo8feaf0c02005-08-09 20:09:30 -0700504 if (inet_twsk_del_dead_node(tw))
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700505 tcp_tw_count--;
506 else
507 atomic_inc(&tw->tw_refcnt);
508
509 if (slot >= TCP_TW_RECYCLE_SLOTS) {
510 /* Schedule to slow timer */
511 if (timeo >= TCP_TIMEWAIT_LEN) {
512 slot = TCP_TWKILL_SLOTS-1;
513 } else {
514 slot = (timeo + TCP_TWKILL_PERIOD-1) / TCP_TWKILL_PERIOD;
515 if (slot >= TCP_TWKILL_SLOTS)
516 slot = TCP_TWKILL_SLOTS-1;
517 }
518 tw->tw_ttd = jiffies + timeo;
519 slot = (tcp_tw_death_row_slot + slot) & (TCP_TWKILL_SLOTS - 1);
520 list = &tcp_tw_death_row[slot];
521 } else {
522 tw->tw_ttd = jiffies + (slot << TCP_TW_RECYCLE_TICK);
523
524 if (tcp_twcal_hand < 0) {
525 tcp_twcal_hand = 0;
526 tcp_twcal_jiffie = jiffies;
527 tcp_twcal_timer.expires = tcp_twcal_jiffie + (slot<<TCP_TW_RECYCLE_TICK);
528 add_timer(&tcp_twcal_timer);
529 } else {
530 if (time_after(tcp_twcal_timer.expires, jiffies + (slot<<TCP_TW_RECYCLE_TICK)))
531 mod_timer(&tcp_twcal_timer, jiffies + (slot<<TCP_TW_RECYCLE_TICK));
532 slot = (tcp_twcal_hand + slot)&(TCP_TW_RECYCLE_SLOTS-1);
533 }
534 list = &tcp_twcal_row[slot];
535 }
536
537 hlist_add_head(&tw->tw_death_node, list);
538
539 if (tcp_tw_count++ == 0)
540 mod_timer(&tcp_tw_timer, jiffies+TCP_TWKILL_PERIOD);
541 spin_unlock(&tw_death_lock);
542}
543
544void tcp_twcal_tick(unsigned long dummy)
545{
546 int n, slot;
547 unsigned long j;
548 unsigned long now = jiffies;
549 int killed = 0;
550 int adv = 0;
551
552 spin_lock(&tw_death_lock);
553 if (tcp_twcal_hand < 0)
554 goto out;
555
556 slot = tcp_twcal_hand;
557 j = tcp_twcal_jiffie;
558
559 for (n=0; n<TCP_TW_RECYCLE_SLOTS; n++) {
560 if (time_before_eq(j, now)) {
561 struct hlist_node *node, *safe;
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo8feaf0c02005-08-09 20:09:30 -0700562 struct inet_timewait_sock *tw;
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700563
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo8feaf0c02005-08-09 20:09:30 -0700564 inet_twsk_for_each_inmate_safe(tw, node, safe,
565 &tcp_twcal_row[slot]) {
566 __inet_twsk_del_dead_node(tw);
Arnaldo Carvalho de Meloe48c4142005-08-09 20:09:46 -0700567 __inet_twsk_kill(tw, &tcp_hashinfo);
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo8feaf0c02005-08-09 20:09:30 -0700568 inet_twsk_put(tw);
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700569 killed++;
570 }
571 } else {
572 if (!adv) {
573 adv = 1;
574 tcp_twcal_jiffie = j;
575 tcp_twcal_hand = slot;
576 }
577
578 if (!hlist_empty(&tcp_twcal_row[slot])) {
579 mod_timer(&tcp_twcal_timer, j);
580 goto out;
581 }
582 }
583 j += (1<<TCP_TW_RECYCLE_TICK);
584 slot = (slot+1)&(TCP_TW_RECYCLE_SLOTS-1);
585 }
586 tcp_twcal_hand = -1;
587
588out:
589 if ((tcp_tw_count -= killed) == 0)
590 del_timer(&tcp_tw_timer);
591 NET_ADD_STATS_BH(LINUX_MIB_TIMEWAITKILLED, killed);
592 spin_unlock(&tw_death_lock);
593}
594
595/* This is not only more efficient than what we used to do, it eliminates
596 * a lot of code duplication between IPv4/IPv6 SYN recv processing. -DaveM
597 *
598 * Actually, we could lots of memory writes here. tp of listening
599 * socket contains all necessary default parameters.
600 */
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo60236fd2005-06-18 22:47:21 -0700601struct sock *tcp_create_openreq_child(struct sock *sk, struct request_sock *req, struct sk_buff *skb)
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700602{
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo9f1d2602005-08-09 20:11:24 -0700603 struct sock *newsk = inet_csk_clone(sk, req, GFP_ATOMIC);
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700604
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo87d11ce2005-08-09 20:10:12 -0700605 if (newsk != NULL) {
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo9f1d2602005-08-09 20:11:24 -0700606 const struct inet_request_sock *ireq = inet_rsk(req);
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo2e6599c2005-06-18 22:46:52 -0700607 struct tcp_request_sock *treq = tcp_rsk(req);
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo9f1d2602005-08-09 20:11:24 -0700608 struct inet_connection_sock *newicsk = inet_csk(sk);
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700609 struct tcp_sock *newtp;
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700610
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700611 /* Now setup tcp_sock */
612 newtp = tcp_sk(newsk);
613 newtp->pred_flags = 0;
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo2e6599c2005-06-18 22:46:52 -0700614 newtp->rcv_nxt = treq->rcv_isn + 1;
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo87d11ce2005-08-09 20:10:12 -0700615 newtp->snd_nxt = newtp->snd_una = newtp->snd_sml = treq->snt_isn + 1;
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700616
617 tcp_prequeue_init(newtp);
618
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo2e6599c2005-06-18 22:46:52 -0700619 tcp_init_wl(newtp, treq->snt_isn, treq->rcv_isn);
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700620
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700621 newtp->srtt = 0;
622 newtp->mdev = TCP_TIMEOUT_INIT;
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo463c84b2005-08-09 20:10:42 -0700623 newicsk->icsk_rto = TCP_TIMEOUT_INIT;
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700624
625 newtp->packets_out = 0;
626 newtp->left_out = 0;
627 newtp->retrans_out = 0;
628 newtp->sacked_out = 0;
629 newtp->fackets_out = 0;
630 newtp->snd_ssthresh = 0x7fffffff;
631
632 /* So many TCP implementations out there (incorrectly) count the
633 * initial SYN frame in their delayed-ACK and congestion control
634 * algorithms that we must have the following bandaid to talk
635 * efficiently to them. -DaveM
636 */
637 newtp->snd_cwnd = 2;
638 newtp->snd_cwnd_cnt = 0;
639
640 newtp->frto_counter = 0;
641 newtp->frto_highmark = 0;
642
Stephen Hemminger317a76f2005-06-23 12:19:55 -0700643 newtp->ca_ops = &tcp_reno;
644
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700645 tcp_set_ca_state(newtp, TCP_CA_Open);
646 tcp_init_xmit_timers(newsk);
647 skb_queue_head_init(&newtp->out_of_order_queue);
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo2e6599c2005-06-18 22:46:52 -0700648 newtp->rcv_wup = treq->rcv_isn + 1;
649 newtp->write_seq = treq->snt_isn + 1;
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700650 newtp->pushed_seq = newtp->write_seq;
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo2e6599c2005-06-18 22:46:52 -0700651 newtp->copied_seq = treq->rcv_isn + 1;
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700652
653 newtp->rx_opt.saw_tstamp = 0;
654
655 newtp->rx_opt.dsack = 0;
656 newtp->rx_opt.eff_sacks = 0;
657
658 newtp->probes_out = 0;
659 newtp->rx_opt.num_sacks = 0;
660 newtp->urg_data = 0;
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700661
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700662 if (sock_flag(newsk, SOCK_KEEPOPEN))
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo463c84b2005-08-09 20:10:42 -0700663 inet_csk_reset_keepalive_timer(newsk,
664 keepalive_time_when(newtp));
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700665
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo2e6599c2005-06-18 22:46:52 -0700666 newtp->rx_opt.tstamp_ok = ireq->tstamp_ok;
667 if((newtp->rx_opt.sack_ok = ireq->sack_ok) != 0) {
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700668 if (sysctl_tcp_fack)
669 newtp->rx_opt.sack_ok |= 2;
670 }
671 newtp->window_clamp = req->window_clamp;
672 newtp->rcv_ssthresh = req->rcv_wnd;
673 newtp->rcv_wnd = req->rcv_wnd;
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo2e6599c2005-06-18 22:46:52 -0700674 newtp->rx_opt.wscale_ok = ireq->wscale_ok;
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700675 if (newtp->rx_opt.wscale_ok) {
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo2e6599c2005-06-18 22:46:52 -0700676 newtp->rx_opt.snd_wscale = ireq->snd_wscale;
677 newtp->rx_opt.rcv_wscale = ireq->rcv_wscale;
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700678 } else {
679 newtp->rx_opt.snd_wscale = newtp->rx_opt.rcv_wscale = 0;
680 newtp->window_clamp = min(newtp->window_clamp, 65535U);
681 }
682 newtp->snd_wnd = ntohs(skb->h.th->window) << newtp->rx_opt.snd_wscale;
683 newtp->max_window = newtp->snd_wnd;
684
685 if (newtp->rx_opt.tstamp_ok) {
686 newtp->rx_opt.ts_recent = req->ts_recent;
687 newtp->rx_opt.ts_recent_stamp = xtime.tv_sec;
688 newtp->tcp_header_len = sizeof(struct tcphdr) + TCPOLEN_TSTAMP_ALIGNED;
689 } else {
690 newtp->rx_opt.ts_recent_stamp = 0;
691 newtp->tcp_header_len = sizeof(struct tcphdr);
692 }
693 if (skb->len >= TCP_MIN_RCVMSS+newtp->tcp_header_len)
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo463c84b2005-08-09 20:10:42 -0700694 newicsk->icsk_ack.last_seg_size = skb->len - newtp->tcp_header_len;
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700695 newtp->rx_opt.mss_clamp = req->mss;
696 TCP_ECN_openreq_child(newtp, req);
697 if (newtp->ecn_flags&TCP_ECN_OK)
698 sock_set_flag(newsk, SOCK_NO_LARGESEND);
699
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700700 TCP_INC_STATS_BH(TCP_MIB_PASSIVEOPENS);
701 }
702 return newsk;
703}
704
705/*
706 * Process an incoming packet for SYN_RECV sockets represented
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo60236fd2005-06-18 22:47:21 -0700707 * as a request_sock.
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700708 */
709
710struct sock *tcp_check_req(struct sock *sk,struct sk_buff *skb,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo60236fd2005-06-18 22:47:21 -0700711 struct request_sock *req,
712 struct request_sock **prev)
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700713{
714 struct tcphdr *th = skb->h.th;
715 struct tcp_sock *tp = tcp_sk(sk);
716 u32 flg = tcp_flag_word(th) & (TCP_FLAG_RST|TCP_FLAG_SYN|TCP_FLAG_ACK);
717 int paws_reject = 0;
718 struct tcp_options_received tmp_opt;
719 struct sock *child;
720
721 tmp_opt.saw_tstamp = 0;
722 if (th->doff > (sizeof(struct tcphdr)>>2)) {
723 tcp_parse_options(skb, &tmp_opt, 0);
724
725 if (tmp_opt.saw_tstamp) {
726 tmp_opt.ts_recent = req->ts_recent;
727 /* We do not store true stamp, but it is not required,
728 * it can be estimated (approximately)
729 * from another data.
730 */
731 tmp_opt.ts_recent_stamp = xtime.tv_sec - ((TCP_TIMEOUT_INIT/HZ)<<req->retrans);
732 paws_reject = tcp_paws_check(&tmp_opt, th->rst);
733 }
734 }
735
736 /* Check for pure retransmitted SYN. */
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo2e6599c2005-06-18 22:46:52 -0700737 if (TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->seq == tcp_rsk(req)->rcv_isn &&
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700738 flg == TCP_FLAG_SYN &&
739 !paws_reject) {
740 /*
741 * RFC793 draws (Incorrectly! It was fixed in RFC1122)
742 * this case on figure 6 and figure 8, but formal
743 * protocol description says NOTHING.
744 * To be more exact, it says that we should send ACK,
745 * because this segment (at least, if it has no data)
746 * is out of window.
747 *
748 * CONCLUSION: RFC793 (even with RFC1122) DOES NOT
749 * describe SYN-RECV state. All the description
750 * is wrong, we cannot believe to it and should
751 * rely only on common sense and implementation
752 * experience.
753 *
754 * Enforce "SYN-ACK" according to figure 8, figure 6
755 * of RFC793, fixed by RFC1122.
756 */
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo60236fd2005-06-18 22:47:21 -0700757 req->rsk_ops->rtx_syn_ack(sk, req, NULL);
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700758 return NULL;
759 }
760
761 /* Further reproduces section "SEGMENT ARRIVES"
762 for state SYN-RECEIVED of RFC793.
763 It is broken, however, it does not work only
764 when SYNs are crossed.
765
766 You would think that SYN crossing is impossible here, since
767 we should have a SYN_SENT socket (from connect()) on our end,
768 but this is not true if the crossed SYNs were sent to both
769 ends by a malicious third party. We must defend against this,
770 and to do that we first verify the ACK (as per RFC793, page
771 36) and reset if it is invalid. Is this a true full defense?
772 To convince ourselves, let us consider a way in which the ACK
773 test can still pass in this 'malicious crossed SYNs' case.
774 Malicious sender sends identical SYNs (and thus identical sequence
775 numbers) to both A and B:
776
777 A: gets SYN, seq=7
778 B: gets SYN, seq=7
779
780 By our good fortune, both A and B select the same initial
781 send sequence number of seven :-)
782
783 A: sends SYN|ACK, seq=7, ack_seq=8
784 B: sends SYN|ACK, seq=7, ack_seq=8
785
786 So we are now A eating this SYN|ACK, ACK test passes. So
787 does sequence test, SYN is truncated, and thus we consider
788 it a bare ACK.
789
790 If tp->defer_accept, we silently drop this bare ACK. Otherwise,
791 we create an established connection. Both ends (listening sockets)
792 accept the new incoming connection and try to talk to each other. 8-)
793
794 Note: This case is both harmless, and rare. Possibility is about the
795 same as us discovering intelligent life on another plant tomorrow.
796
797 But generally, we should (RFC lies!) to accept ACK
798 from SYNACK both here and in tcp_rcv_state_process().
799 tcp_rcv_state_process() does not, hence, we do not too.
800
801 Note that the case is absolutely generic:
802 we cannot optimize anything here without
803 violating protocol. All the checks must be made
804 before attempt to create socket.
805 */
806
807 /* RFC793 page 36: "If the connection is in any non-synchronized state ...
808 * and the incoming segment acknowledges something not yet
809 * sent (the segment carries an unaccaptable ACK) ...
810 * a reset is sent."
811 *
812 * Invalid ACK: reset will be sent by listening socket
813 */
814 if ((flg & TCP_FLAG_ACK) &&
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo2e6599c2005-06-18 22:46:52 -0700815 (TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->ack_seq != tcp_rsk(req)->snt_isn + 1))
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700816 return sk;
817
818 /* Also, it would be not so bad idea to check rcv_tsecr, which
819 * is essentially ACK extension and too early or too late values
820 * should cause reset in unsynchronized states.
821 */
822
823 /* RFC793: "first check sequence number". */
824
825 if (paws_reject || !tcp_in_window(TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->seq, TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->end_seq,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo2e6599c2005-06-18 22:46:52 -0700826 tcp_rsk(req)->rcv_isn + 1, tcp_rsk(req)->rcv_isn + 1 + req->rcv_wnd)) {
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700827 /* Out of window: send ACK and drop. */
828 if (!(flg & TCP_FLAG_RST))
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo60236fd2005-06-18 22:47:21 -0700829 req->rsk_ops->send_ack(skb, req);
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700830 if (paws_reject)
831 NET_INC_STATS_BH(LINUX_MIB_PAWSESTABREJECTED);
832 return NULL;
833 }
834
835 /* In sequence, PAWS is OK. */
836
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo2e6599c2005-06-18 22:46:52 -0700837 if (tmp_opt.saw_tstamp && !after(TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->seq, tcp_rsk(req)->rcv_isn + 1))
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700838 req->ts_recent = tmp_opt.rcv_tsval;
839
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo2e6599c2005-06-18 22:46:52 -0700840 if (TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->seq == tcp_rsk(req)->rcv_isn) {
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700841 /* Truncate SYN, it is out of window starting
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo2e6599c2005-06-18 22:46:52 -0700842 at tcp_rsk(req)->rcv_isn + 1. */
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700843 flg &= ~TCP_FLAG_SYN;
844 }
845
846 /* RFC793: "second check the RST bit" and
847 * "fourth, check the SYN bit"
848 */
849 if (flg & (TCP_FLAG_RST|TCP_FLAG_SYN))
850 goto embryonic_reset;
851
852 /* ACK sequence verified above, just make sure ACK is
853 * set. If ACK not set, just silently drop the packet.
854 */
855 if (!(flg & TCP_FLAG_ACK))
856 return NULL;
857
858 /* If TCP_DEFER_ACCEPT is set, drop bare ACK. */
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo2e6599c2005-06-18 22:46:52 -0700859 if (tp->defer_accept && TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->end_seq == tcp_rsk(req)->rcv_isn + 1) {
860 inet_rsk(req)->acked = 1;
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700861 return NULL;
862 }
863
864 /* OK, ACK is valid, create big socket and
865 * feed this segment to it. It will repeat all
866 * the tests. THIS SEGMENT MUST MOVE SOCKET TO
867 * ESTABLISHED STATE. If it will be dropped after
868 * socket is created, wait for troubles.
869 */
870 child = tp->af_specific->syn_recv_sock(sk, skb, req, NULL);
871 if (child == NULL)
872 goto listen_overflow;
873
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo463c84b2005-08-09 20:10:42 -0700874 inet_csk_reqsk_queue_unlink(sk, req, prev);
875 inet_csk_reqsk_queue_removed(sk, req);
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700876
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo463c84b2005-08-09 20:10:42 -0700877 inet_csk_reqsk_queue_add(sk, req, child);
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700878 return child;
879
880 listen_overflow:
881 if (!sysctl_tcp_abort_on_overflow) {
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo2e6599c2005-06-18 22:46:52 -0700882 inet_rsk(req)->acked = 1;
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700883 return NULL;
884 }
885
886 embryonic_reset:
887 NET_INC_STATS_BH(LINUX_MIB_EMBRYONICRSTS);
888 if (!(flg & TCP_FLAG_RST))
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo60236fd2005-06-18 22:47:21 -0700889 req->rsk_ops->send_reset(skb);
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700890
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo463c84b2005-08-09 20:10:42 -0700891 inet_csk_reqsk_queue_drop(sk, req, prev);
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700892 return NULL;
893}
894
895/*
896 * Queue segment on the new socket if the new socket is active,
897 * otherwise we just shortcircuit this and continue with
898 * the new socket.
899 */
900
901int tcp_child_process(struct sock *parent, struct sock *child,
902 struct sk_buff *skb)
903{
904 int ret = 0;
905 int state = child->sk_state;
906
907 if (!sock_owned_by_user(child)) {
908 ret = tcp_rcv_state_process(child, skb, skb->h.th, skb->len);
909
910 /* Wakeup parent, send SIGIO */
911 if (state == TCP_SYN_RECV && child->sk_state != state)
912 parent->sk_data_ready(parent, 0);
913 } else {
914 /* Alas, it is possible again, because we do lookup
915 * in main socket hash table and lock on listening
916 * socket does not protect us more.
917 */
918 sk_add_backlog(child, skb);
919 }
920
921 bh_unlock_sock(child);
922 sock_put(child);
923 return ret;
924}
925
926EXPORT_SYMBOL(tcp_check_req);
927EXPORT_SYMBOL(tcp_child_process);
928EXPORT_SYMBOL(tcp_create_openreq_child);
929EXPORT_SYMBOL(tcp_timewait_state_process);
930EXPORT_SYMBOL(tcp_tw_deschedule);