Linus Torvalds | 1da177e | 2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 1 | PLIP: The Parallel Line Internet Protocol Device |
| 2 | |
| 3 | Donald Becker (becker@super.org) |
| 4 | I.D.A. Supercomputing Research Center, Bowie MD 20715 |
| 5 | |
| 6 | At some point T. Thorn will probably contribute text, |
| 7 | Tommy Thorn (tthorn@daimi.aau.dk) |
| 8 | |
| 9 | PLIP Introduction |
| 10 | ----------------- |
| 11 | |
| 12 | This document describes the parallel port packet pusher for Net/LGX. |
| 13 | This device interface allows a point-to-point connection between two |
| 14 | parallel ports to appear as a IP network interface. |
| 15 | |
| 16 | What is PLIP? |
| 17 | ============= |
| 18 | |
| 19 | PLIP is Parallel Line IP, that is, the transportation of IP packages |
| 20 | over a parallel port. In the case of a PC, the obvious choice is the |
| 21 | printer port. PLIP is a non-standard, but [can use] uses the standard |
| 22 | LapLink null-printer cable [can also work in turbo mode, with a PLIP |
| 23 | cable]. [The protocol used to pack IP packages, is a simple one |
| 24 | initiated by Crynwr.] |
| 25 | |
| 26 | Advantages of PLIP |
| 27 | ================== |
| 28 | |
| 29 | It's cheap, it's available everywhere, and it's easy. |
| 30 | |
| 31 | The PLIP cable is all that's needed to connect two Linux boxes, and it |
| 32 | can be built for very few bucks. |
| 33 | |
| 34 | Connecting two Linux boxes takes only a second's decision and a few |
| 35 | minutes' work, no need to search for a [supported] netcard. This might |
| 36 | even be especially important in the case of notebooks, where netcards |
| 37 | are not easily available. |
| 38 | |
| 39 | Not requiring a netcard also means that apart from connecting the |
| 40 | cables, everything else is software configuration [which in principle |
| 41 | could be made very easy.] |
| 42 | |
| 43 | Disadvantages of PLIP |
| 44 | ===================== |
| 45 | |
| 46 | Doesn't work over a modem, like SLIP and PPP. Limited range, 15 m. |
| 47 | Can only be used to connect three (?) Linux boxes. Doesn't connect to |
| 48 | an existing Ethernet. Isn't standard (not even de facto standard, like |
| 49 | SLIP). |
| 50 | |
| 51 | Performance |
| 52 | =========== |
| 53 | |
| 54 | PLIP easily outperforms Ethernet cards....(ups, I was dreaming, but |
| 55 | it *is* getting late. EOB) |
| 56 | |
| 57 | PLIP driver details |
| 58 | ------------------- |
| 59 | |
| 60 | The Linux PLIP driver is an implementation of the original Crynwr protocol, |
| 61 | that uses the parallel port subsystem of the kernel in order to properly |
| 62 | share parallel ports between PLIP and other services. |
| 63 | |
| 64 | IRQs and trigger timeouts |
| 65 | ========================= |
| 66 | |
| 67 | When a parallel port used for a PLIP driver has an IRQ configured to it, the |
| 68 | PLIP driver is signaled whenever data is sent to it via the cable, such that |
| 69 | when no data is available, the driver isn't being used. |
| 70 | |
| 71 | However, on some machines it is hard, if not impossible, to configure an IRQ |
| 72 | to a certain parallel port, mainly because it is used by some other device. |
| 73 | On these machines, the PLIP driver can be used in IRQ-less mode, where |
| 74 | the PLIP driver would constantly poll the parallel port for data waiting, |
| 75 | and if such data is available, process it. This mode is less efficient than |
| 76 | the IRQ mode, because the driver has to check the parallel port many times |
| 77 | per second, even when no data at all is sent. Some rough measurements |
| 78 | indicate that there isn't a noticeable performance drop when using IRQ-less |
| 79 | mode as compared to IRQ mode as far as the data transfer speed is involved. |
| 80 | There is a performance drop on the machine hosting the driver. |
| 81 | |
| 82 | When the PLIP driver is used in IRQ mode, the timeout used for triggering a |
| 83 | data transfer (the maximal time the PLIP driver would allow the other side |
| 84 | before announcing a timeout, when trying to handshake a transfer of some |
| 85 | data) is, by default, 500usec. As IRQ delivery is more or less immediate, |
| 86 | this timeout is quite sufficient. |
| 87 | |
| 88 | When in IRQ-less mode, the PLIP driver polls the parallel port HZ times |
| 89 | per second (where HZ is typically 100 on most platforms, and 1024 on an |
| 90 | Alpha, as of this writing). Between two such polls, there are 10^6/HZ usecs. |
| 91 | On an i386, for example, 10^6/100 = 10000usec. It is easy to see that it is |
| 92 | quite possible for the trigger timeout to expire between two such polls, as |
| 93 | the timeout is only 500usec long. As a result, it is required to change the |
| 94 | trigger timeout on the *other* side of a PLIP connection, to about |
| 95 | 10^6/HZ usecs. If both sides of a PLIP connection are used in IRQ-less mode, |
| 96 | this timeout is required on both sides. |
| 97 | |
| 98 | It appears that in practice, the trigger timeout can be shorter than in the |
| 99 | above calculation. It isn't an important issue, unless the wire is faulty, |
| 100 | in which case a long timeout would stall the machine when, for whatever |
| 101 | reason, bits are dropped. |
| 102 | |
| 103 | A utility that can perform this change in Linux is plipconfig, which is part |
| 104 | of the net-tools package (its location can be found in the |
| 105 | Documentation/Changes file). An example command would be |
| 106 | 'plipconfig plipX trigger 10000', where plipX is the appropriate |
| 107 | PLIP device. |
| 108 | |
| 109 | PLIP hardware interconnection |
| 110 | ----------------------------- |
| 111 | |
| 112 | PLIP uses several different data transfer methods. The first (and the |
| 113 | only one implemented in the early version of the code) uses a standard |
| 114 | printer "null" cable to transfer data four bits at a time using |
| 115 | data bit outputs connected to status bit inputs. |
| 116 | |
| 117 | The second data transfer method relies on both machines having |
| 118 | bi-directional parallel ports, rather than output-only ``printer'' |
| 119 | ports. This allows byte-wide transfers and avoids reconstructing |
| 120 | nibbles into bytes, leading to much faster transfers. |
| 121 | |
| 122 | Parallel Transfer Mode 0 Cable |
| 123 | ============================== |
| 124 | |
| 125 | The cable for the first transfer mode is a standard |
| 126 | printer "null" cable which transfers data four bits at a time using |
| 127 | data bit outputs of the first port (machine T) connected to the |
| 128 | status bit inputs of the second port (machine R). There are five |
| 129 | status inputs, and they are used as four data inputs and a clock (data |
| 130 | strobe) input, arranged so that the data input bits appear as contiguous |
| 131 | bits with standard status register implementation. |
| 132 | |
| 133 | A cable that implements this protocol is available commercially as a |
| 134 | "Null Printer" or "Turbo Laplink" cable. It can be constructed with |
| 135 | two DB-25 male connectors symmetrically connected as follows: |
| 136 | |
| 137 | STROBE output 1* |
| 138 | D0->ERROR 2 - 15 15 - 2 |
| 139 | D1->SLCT 3 - 13 13 - 3 |
| 140 | D2->PAPOUT 4 - 12 12 - 4 |
| 141 | D3->ACK 5 - 10 10 - 5 |
| 142 | D4->BUSY 6 - 11 11 - 6 |
| 143 | D5,D6,D7 are 7*, 8*, 9* |
| 144 | AUTOFD output 14* |
| 145 | INIT output 16* |
| 146 | SLCTIN 17 - 17 |
| 147 | extra grounds are 18*,19*,20*,21*,22*,23*,24* |
| 148 | GROUND 25 - 25 |
| 149 | * Do not connect these pins on either end |
| 150 | |
| 151 | If the cable you are using has a metallic shield it should be |
| 152 | connected to the metallic DB-25 shell at one end only. |
| 153 | |
| 154 | Parallel Transfer Mode 1 |
| 155 | ======================== |
| 156 | |
| 157 | The second data transfer method relies on both machines having |
| 158 | bi-directional parallel ports, rather than output-only ``printer'' |
| 159 | ports. This allows byte-wide transfers, and avoids reconstructing |
| 160 | nibbles into bytes. This cable should not be used on unidirectional |
| 161 | ``printer'' (as opposed to ``parallel'') ports or when the machine |
| 162 | isn't configured for PLIP, as it will result in output driver |
| 163 | conflicts and the (unlikely) possibility of damage. |
| 164 | |
| 165 | The cable for this transfer mode should be constructed as follows: |
| 166 | |
| 167 | STROBE->BUSY 1 - 11 |
| 168 | D0->D0 2 - 2 |
| 169 | D1->D1 3 - 3 |
| 170 | D2->D2 4 - 4 |
| 171 | D3->D3 5 - 5 |
| 172 | D4->D4 6 - 6 |
| 173 | D5->D5 7 - 7 |
| 174 | D6->D6 8 - 8 |
| 175 | D7->D7 9 - 9 |
| 176 | INIT -> ACK 16 - 10 |
| 177 | AUTOFD->PAPOUT 14 - 12 |
| 178 | SLCT->SLCTIN 13 - 17 |
| 179 | GND->ERROR 18 - 15 |
| 180 | extra grounds are 19*,20*,21*,22*,23*,24* |
| 181 | GROUND 25 - 25 |
| 182 | * Do not connect these pins on either end |
| 183 | |
| 184 | Once again, if the cable you are using has a metallic shield it should |
| 185 | be connected to the metallic DB-25 shell at one end only. |
| 186 | |
| 187 | PLIP Mode 0 transfer protocol |
| 188 | ============================= |
| 189 | |
| 190 | The PLIP driver is compatible with the "Crynwr" parallel port transfer |
| 191 | standard in Mode 0. That standard specifies the following protocol: |
| 192 | |
| 193 | send header nibble '0x8' |
| 194 | count-low octet |
| 195 | count-high octet |
| 196 | ... data octets |
| 197 | checksum octet |
| 198 | |
| 199 | Each octet is sent as |
| 200 | <wait for rx. '0x1?'> <send 0x10+(octet&0x0F)> |
| 201 | <wait for rx. '0x0?'> <send 0x00+((octet>>4)&0x0F)> |
| 202 | |
| 203 | To start a transfer the transmitting machine outputs a nibble 0x08. |
| 204 | That raises the ACK line, triggering an interrupt in the receiving |
| 205 | machine. The receiving machine disables interrupts and raises its own ACK |
| 206 | line. |
| 207 | |
| 208 | Restated: |
| 209 | |
| 210 | (OUT is bit 0-4, OUT.j is bit j from OUT. IN likewise) |
| 211 | Send_Byte: |
| 212 | OUT := low nibble, OUT.4 := 1 |
| 213 | WAIT FOR IN.4 = 1 |
| 214 | OUT := high nibble, OUT.4 := 0 |
| 215 | WAIT FOR IN.4 = 0 |