Neil Brown | 7c37fbd | 2014-10-24 00:14:39 +0200 | [diff] [blame] | 1 | Written by: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> |
| 2 | |
| 3 | Overlay Filesystem |
| 4 | ================== |
| 5 | |
| 6 | This document describes a prototype for a new approach to providing |
| 7 | overlay-filesystem functionality in Linux (sometimes referred to as |
| 8 | union-filesystems). An overlay-filesystem tries to present a |
| 9 | filesystem which is the result over overlaying one filesystem on top |
| 10 | of the other. |
| 11 | |
| 12 | The result will inevitably fail to look exactly like a normal |
| 13 | filesystem for various technical reasons. The expectation is that |
| 14 | many use cases will be able to ignore these differences. |
| 15 | |
| 16 | This approach is 'hybrid' because the objects that appear in the |
| 17 | filesystem do not all appear to belong to that filesystem. In many |
| 18 | cases an object accessed in the union will be indistinguishable |
| 19 | from accessing the corresponding object from the original filesystem. |
| 20 | This is most obvious from the 'st_dev' field returned by stat(2). |
| 21 | |
| 22 | While directories will report an st_dev from the overlay-filesystem, |
| 23 | all non-directory objects will report an st_dev from the lower or |
| 24 | upper filesystem that is providing the object. Similarly st_ino will |
| 25 | only be unique when combined with st_dev, and both of these can change |
| 26 | over the lifetime of a non-directory object. Many applications and |
| 27 | tools ignore these values and will not be affected. |
| 28 | |
| 29 | Upper and Lower |
| 30 | --------------- |
| 31 | |
| 32 | An overlay filesystem combines two filesystems - an 'upper' filesystem |
| 33 | and a 'lower' filesystem. When a name exists in both filesystems, the |
| 34 | object in the 'upper' filesystem is visible while the object in the |
| 35 | 'lower' filesystem is either hidden or, in the case of directories, |
| 36 | merged with the 'upper' object. |
| 37 | |
| 38 | It would be more correct to refer to an upper and lower 'directory |
| 39 | tree' rather than 'filesystem' as it is quite possible for both |
| 40 | directory trees to be in the same filesystem and there is no |
| 41 | requirement that the root of a filesystem be given for either upper or |
| 42 | lower. |
| 43 | |
| 44 | The lower filesystem can be any filesystem supported by Linux and does |
| 45 | not need to be writable. The lower filesystem can even be another |
| 46 | overlayfs. The upper filesystem will normally be writable and if it |
| 47 | is it must support the creation of trusted.* extended attributes, and |
| 48 | must provide valid d_type in readdir responses, so NFS is not suitable. |
| 49 | |
| 50 | A read-only overlay of two read-only filesystems may use any |
| 51 | filesystem type. |
| 52 | |
| 53 | Directories |
| 54 | ----------- |
| 55 | |
| 56 | Overlaying mainly involves directories. If a given name appears in both |
| 57 | upper and lower filesystems and refers to a non-directory in either, |
| 58 | then the lower object is hidden - the name refers only to the upper |
| 59 | object. |
| 60 | |
| 61 | Where both upper and lower objects are directories, a merged directory |
| 62 | is formed. |
| 63 | |
| 64 | At mount time, the two directories given as mount options "lowerdir" and |
| 65 | "upperdir" are combined into a merged directory: |
| 66 | |
| 67 | mount -t overlayfs overlayfs -olowerdir=/lower,upperdir=/upper,\ |
| 68 | workdir=/work /merged |
| 69 | |
| 70 | The "workdir" needs to be an empty directory on the same filesystem |
| 71 | as upperdir. |
| 72 | |
| 73 | Then whenever a lookup is requested in such a merged directory, the |
| 74 | lookup is performed in each actual directory and the combined result |
| 75 | is cached in the dentry belonging to the overlay filesystem. If both |
| 76 | actual lookups find directories, both are stored and a merged |
| 77 | directory is created, otherwise only one is stored: the upper if it |
| 78 | exists, else the lower. |
| 79 | |
| 80 | Only the lists of names from directories are merged. Other content |
| 81 | such as metadata and extended attributes are reported for the upper |
| 82 | directory only. These attributes of the lower directory are hidden. |
| 83 | |
| 84 | whiteouts and opaque directories |
| 85 | -------------------------------- |
| 86 | |
| 87 | In order to support rm and rmdir without changing the lower |
| 88 | filesystem, an overlay filesystem needs to record in the upper filesystem |
| 89 | that files have been removed. This is done using whiteouts and opaque |
| 90 | directories (non-directories are always opaque). |
| 91 | |
| 92 | A whiteout is created as a character device with 0/0 device number. |
| 93 | When a whiteout is found in the upper level of a merged directory, any |
| 94 | matching name in the lower level is ignored, and the whiteout itself |
| 95 | is also hidden. |
| 96 | |
| 97 | A directory is made opaque by setting the xattr "trusted.overlay.opaque" |
| 98 | to "y". Where the upper filesystem contains an opaque directory, any |
| 99 | directory in the lower filesystem with the same name is ignored. |
| 100 | |
| 101 | readdir |
| 102 | ------- |
| 103 | |
| 104 | When a 'readdir' request is made on a merged directory, the upper and |
| 105 | lower directories are each read and the name lists merged in the |
| 106 | obvious way (upper is read first, then lower - entries that already |
| 107 | exist are not re-added). This merged name list is cached in the |
| 108 | 'struct file' and so remains as long as the file is kept open. If the |
| 109 | directory is opened and read by two processes at the same time, they |
| 110 | will each have separate caches. A seekdir to the start of the |
| 111 | directory (offset 0) followed by a readdir will cause the cache to be |
| 112 | discarded and rebuilt. |
| 113 | |
| 114 | This means that changes to the merged directory do not appear while a |
| 115 | directory is being read. This is unlikely to be noticed by many |
| 116 | programs. |
| 117 | |
| 118 | seek offsets are assigned sequentially when the directories are read. |
| 119 | Thus if |
| 120 | - read part of a directory |
| 121 | - remember an offset, and close the directory |
| 122 | - re-open the directory some time later |
| 123 | - seek to the remembered offset |
| 124 | |
| 125 | there may be little correlation between the old and new locations in |
| 126 | the list of filenames, particularly if anything has changed in the |
| 127 | directory. |
| 128 | |
| 129 | Readdir on directories that are not merged is simply handled by the |
| 130 | underlying directory (upper or lower). |
| 131 | |
| 132 | |
| 133 | Non-directories |
| 134 | --------------- |
| 135 | |
| 136 | Objects that are not directories (files, symlinks, device-special |
| 137 | files etc.) are presented either from the upper or lower filesystem as |
| 138 | appropriate. When a file in the lower filesystem is accessed in a way |
| 139 | the requires write-access, such as opening for write access, changing |
| 140 | some metadata etc., the file is first copied from the lower filesystem |
| 141 | to the upper filesystem (copy_up). Note that creating a hard-link |
| 142 | also requires copy_up, though of course creation of a symlink does |
| 143 | not. |
| 144 | |
| 145 | The copy_up may turn out to be unnecessary, for example if the file is |
| 146 | opened for read-write but the data is not modified. |
| 147 | |
| 148 | The copy_up process first makes sure that the containing directory |
| 149 | exists in the upper filesystem - creating it and any parents as |
| 150 | necessary. It then creates the object with the same metadata (owner, |
| 151 | mode, mtime, symlink-target etc.) and then if the object is a file, the |
| 152 | data is copied from the lower to the upper filesystem. Finally any |
| 153 | extended attributes are copied up. |
| 154 | |
| 155 | Once the copy_up is complete, the overlay filesystem simply |
| 156 | provides direct access to the newly created file in the upper |
| 157 | filesystem - future operations on the file are barely noticed by the |
| 158 | overlay filesystem (though an operation on the name of the file such as |
| 159 | rename or unlink will of course be noticed and handled). |
| 160 | |
| 161 | |
| 162 | Non-standard behavior |
| 163 | --------------------- |
| 164 | |
| 165 | The copy_up operation essentially creates a new, identical file and |
| 166 | moves it over to the old name. The new file may be on a different |
| 167 | filesystem, so both st_dev and st_ino of the file may change. |
| 168 | |
| 169 | Any open files referring to this inode will access the old data and |
| 170 | metadata. Similarly any file locks obtained before copy_up will not |
| 171 | apply to the copied up file. |
| 172 | |
| 173 | On a file opened with O_RDONLY fchmod(2), fchown(2), futimesat(2) and |
| 174 | fsetxattr(2) will fail with EROFS. |
| 175 | |
| 176 | If a file with multiple hard links is copied up, then this will |
| 177 | "break" the link. Changes will not be propagated to other names |
| 178 | referring to the same inode. |
| 179 | |
| 180 | Symlinks in /proc/PID/ and /proc/PID/fd which point to a non-directory |
| 181 | object in overlayfs will not contain valid absolute paths, only |
| 182 | relative paths leading up to the filesystem's root. This will be |
| 183 | fixed in the future. |
| 184 | |
| 185 | Some operations are not atomic, for example a crash during copy_up or |
| 186 | rename will leave the filesystem in an inconsistent state. This will |
| 187 | be addressed in the future. |
| 188 | |
| 189 | Changes to underlying filesystems |
| 190 | --------------------------------- |
| 191 | |
| 192 | Offline changes, when the overlay is not mounted, are allowed to either |
| 193 | the upper or the lower trees. |
| 194 | |
| 195 | Changes to the underlying filesystems while part of a mounted overlay |
| 196 | filesystem are not allowed. If the underlying filesystem is changed, |
| 197 | the behavior of the overlay is undefined, though it will not result in |
| 198 | a crash or deadlock. |