Randy Dunlap | bbb5bbb | 2006-10-29 22:46:40 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 1 | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> |
| 2 | <!DOCTYPE book PUBLIC "-//OASIS//DTD DocBook XML V4.1.2//EN" |
| 3 | "http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/xml/4.1.2/docbookx.dtd" []> |
| 4 | |
| 5 | <book id="Linux-filesystems-API"> |
| 6 | <bookinfo> |
| 7 | <title>Linux Filesystems API</title> |
| 8 | |
| 9 | <legalnotice> |
| 10 | <para> |
| 11 | This documentation is free software; you can redistribute |
| 12 | it and/or modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public |
| 13 | License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either |
| 14 | version 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later |
| 15 | version. |
| 16 | </para> |
| 17 | |
| 18 | <para> |
| 19 | This program is distributed in the hope that it will be |
| 20 | useful, but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied |
| 21 | warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. |
| 22 | See the GNU General Public License for more details. |
| 23 | </para> |
| 24 | |
| 25 | <para> |
| 26 | You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public |
| 27 | License along with this program; if not, write to the Free |
| 28 | Software Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, |
| 29 | MA 02111-1307 USA |
| 30 | </para> |
| 31 | |
| 32 | <para> |
| 33 | For more details see the file COPYING in the source |
| 34 | distribution of Linux. |
| 35 | </para> |
| 36 | </legalnotice> |
| 37 | </bookinfo> |
| 38 | |
| 39 | <toc></toc> |
| 40 | |
| 41 | <chapter id="vfs"> |
| 42 | <title>The Linux VFS</title> |
| 43 | <sect1><title>The Filesystem types</title> |
| 44 | !Iinclude/linux/fs.h |
| 45 | </sect1> |
| 46 | <sect1><title>The Directory Cache</title> |
| 47 | !Efs/dcache.c |
| 48 | !Iinclude/linux/dcache.h |
| 49 | </sect1> |
| 50 | <sect1><title>Inode Handling</title> |
| 51 | !Efs/inode.c |
| 52 | !Efs/bad_inode.c |
| 53 | </sect1> |
| 54 | <sect1><title>Registration and Superblocks</title> |
| 55 | !Efs/super.c |
| 56 | </sect1> |
| 57 | <sect1><title>File Locks</title> |
| 58 | !Efs/locks.c |
| 59 | !Ifs/locks.c |
| 60 | </sect1> |
| 61 | <sect1><title>Other Functions</title> |
| 62 | !Efs/mpage.c |
| 63 | !Efs/namei.c |
| 64 | !Efs/buffer.c |
| 65 | !Efs/bio.c |
| 66 | !Efs/seq_file.c |
| 67 | !Efs/filesystems.c |
| 68 | !Efs/fs-writeback.c |
| 69 | !Efs/block_dev.c |
| 70 | </sect1> |
| 71 | </chapter> |
| 72 | |
| 73 | <chapter id="proc"> |
| 74 | <title>The proc filesystem</title> |
| 75 | |
| 76 | <sect1><title>sysctl interface</title> |
| 77 | !Ekernel/sysctl.c |
| 78 | </sect1> |
| 79 | |
| 80 | <sect1><title>proc filesystem interface</title> |
| 81 | !Ifs/proc/base.c |
| 82 | </sect1> |
| 83 | </chapter> |
| 84 | |
| 85 | <chapter id="sysfs"> |
| 86 | <title>The Filesystem for Exporting Kernel Objects</title> |
| 87 | !Efs/sysfs/file.c |
| 88 | !Efs/sysfs/symlink.c |
| 89 | !Efs/sysfs/bin.c |
| 90 | </chapter> |
| 91 | |
| 92 | <chapter id="debugfs"> |
| 93 | <title>The debugfs filesystem</title> |
| 94 | |
| 95 | <sect1><title>debugfs interface</title> |
| 96 | !Efs/debugfs/inode.c |
| 97 | !Efs/debugfs/file.c |
| 98 | </sect1> |
| 99 | </chapter> |
| 100 | |
Randy Dunlap | 733b72c | 2006-11-02 22:07:02 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 101 | <chapter id="LinuxJDBAPI"> |
| 102 | <chapterinfo> |
| 103 | <title>The Linux Journalling API</title> |
| 104 | |
| 105 | <authorgroup> |
| 106 | <author> |
| 107 | <firstname>Roger</firstname> |
| 108 | <surname>Gammans</surname> |
| 109 | <affiliation> |
| 110 | <address> |
| 111 | <email>rgammans@computer-surgery.co.uk</email> |
| 112 | </address> |
| 113 | </affiliation> |
| 114 | </author> |
| 115 | </authorgroup> |
| 116 | |
| 117 | <authorgroup> |
| 118 | <author> |
| 119 | <firstname>Stephen</firstname> |
| 120 | <surname>Tweedie</surname> |
| 121 | <affiliation> |
| 122 | <address> |
| 123 | <email>sct@redhat.com</email> |
| 124 | </address> |
| 125 | </affiliation> |
| 126 | </author> |
| 127 | </authorgroup> |
| 128 | |
| 129 | <copyright> |
| 130 | <year>2002</year> |
| 131 | <holder>Roger Gammans</holder> |
| 132 | </copyright> |
| 133 | </chapterinfo> |
| 134 | |
| 135 | <title>The Linux Journalling API</title> |
| 136 | |
| 137 | <sect1> |
| 138 | <title>Overview</title> |
| 139 | <sect2> |
| 140 | <title>Details</title> |
| 141 | <para> |
| 142 | The journalling layer is easy to use. You need to |
| 143 | first of all create a journal_t data structure. There are |
| 144 | two calls to do this dependent on how you decide to allocate the physical |
| 145 | media on which the journal resides. The journal_init_inode() call |
| 146 | is for journals stored in filesystem inodes, or the journal_init_dev() |
| 147 | call can be use for journal stored on a raw device (in a continuous range |
| 148 | of blocks). A journal_t is a typedef for a struct pointer, so when |
| 149 | you are finally finished make sure you call journal_destroy() on it |
| 150 | to free up any used kernel memory. |
| 151 | </para> |
| 152 | |
| 153 | <para> |
| 154 | Once you have got your journal_t object you need to 'mount' or load the journal |
| 155 | file, unless of course you haven't initialised it yet - in which case you |
| 156 | need to call journal_create(). |
| 157 | </para> |
| 158 | |
| 159 | <para> |
| 160 | Most of the time however your journal file will already have been created, but |
| 161 | before you load it you must call journal_wipe() to empty the journal file. |
| 162 | Hang on, you say , what if the filesystem wasn't cleanly umount()'d . Well, it is the |
| 163 | job of the client file system to detect this and skip the call to journal_wipe(). |
| 164 | </para> |
| 165 | |
| 166 | <para> |
| 167 | In either case the next call should be to journal_load() which prepares the |
| 168 | journal file for use. Note that journal_wipe(..,0) calls journal_skip_recovery() |
| 169 | for you if it detects any outstanding transactions in the journal and similarly |
| 170 | journal_load() will call journal_recover() if necessary. |
| 171 | I would advise reading fs/ext3/super.c for examples on this stage. |
| 172 | [RGG: Why is the journal_wipe() call necessary - doesn't this needlessly |
| 173 | complicate the API. Or isn't a good idea for the journal layer to hide |
| 174 | dirty mounts from the client fs] |
| 175 | </para> |
| 176 | |
| 177 | <para> |
| 178 | Now you can go ahead and start modifying the underlying |
| 179 | filesystem. Almost. |
| 180 | </para> |
| 181 | |
| 182 | <para> |
| 183 | |
| 184 | You still need to actually journal your filesystem changes, this |
| 185 | is done by wrapping them into transactions. Additionally you |
| 186 | also need to wrap the modification of each of the buffers |
| 187 | with calls to the journal layer, so it knows what the modifications |
| 188 | you are actually making are. To do this use journal_start() which |
| 189 | returns a transaction handle. |
| 190 | </para> |
| 191 | |
| 192 | <para> |
| 193 | journal_start() |
| 194 | and its counterpart journal_stop(), which indicates the end of a transaction |
| 195 | are nestable calls, so you can reenter a transaction if necessary, |
| 196 | but remember you must call journal_stop() the same number of times as |
| 197 | journal_start() before the transaction is completed (or more accurately |
| 198 | leaves the update phase). Ext3/VFS makes use of this feature to simplify |
| 199 | quota support. |
| 200 | </para> |
| 201 | |
| 202 | <para> |
| 203 | Inside each transaction you need to wrap the modifications to the |
| 204 | individual buffers (blocks). Before you start to modify a buffer you |
| 205 | need to call journal_get_{create,write,undo}_access() as appropriate, |
| 206 | this allows the journalling layer to copy the unmodified data if it |
| 207 | needs to. After all the buffer may be part of a previously uncommitted |
| 208 | transaction. |
| 209 | At this point you are at last ready to modify a buffer, and once |
| 210 | you are have done so you need to call journal_dirty_{meta,}data(). |
| 211 | Or if you've asked for access to a buffer you now know is now longer |
| 212 | required to be pushed back on the device you can call journal_forget() |
| 213 | in much the same way as you might have used bforget() in the past. |
| 214 | </para> |
| 215 | |
| 216 | <para> |
| 217 | A journal_flush() may be called at any time to commit and checkpoint |
| 218 | all your transactions. |
| 219 | </para> |
| 220 | |
| 221 | <para> |
| 222 | Then at umount time , in your put_super() (2.4) or write_super() (2.5) |
| 223 | you can then call journal_destroy() to clean up your in-core journal object. |
| 224 | </para> |
| 225 | |
| 226 | <para> |
| 227 | Unfortunately there a couple of ways the journal layer can cause a deadlock. |
| 228 | The first thing to note is that each task can only have |
| 229 | a single outstanding transaction at any one time, remember nothing |
| 230 | commits until the outermost journal_stop(). This means |
| 231 | you must complete the transaction at the end of each file/inode/address |
| 232 | etc. operation you perform, so that the journalling system isn't re-entered |
| 233 | on another journal. Since transactions can't be nested/batched |
| 234 | across differing journals, and another filesystem other than |
| 235 | yours (say ext3) may be modified in a later syscall. |
| 236 | </para> |
| 237 | |
| 238 | <para> |
| 239 | The second case to bear in mind is that journal_start() can |
| 240 | block if there isn't enough space in the journal for your transaction |
| 241 | (based on the passed nblocks param) - when it blocks it merely(!) needs to |
| 242 | wait for transactions to complete and be committed from other tasks, |
| 243 | so essentially we are waiting for journal_stop(). So to avoid |
| 244 | deadlocks you must treat journal_start/stop() as if they |
| 245 | were semaphores and include them in your semaphore ordering rules to prevent |
| 246 | deadlocks. Note that journal_extend() has similar blocking behaviour to |
| 247 | journal_start() so you can deadlock here just as easily as on journal_start(). |
| 248 | </para> |
| 249 | |
| 250 | <para> |
| 251 | Try to reserve the right number of blocks the first time. ;-). This will |
| 252 | be the maximum number of blocks you are going to touch in this transaction. |
| 253 | I advise having a look at at least ext3_jbd.h to see the basis on which |
| 254 | ext3 uses to make these decisions. |
| 255 | </para> |
| 256 | |
| 257 | <para> |
| 258 | Another wriggle to watch out for is your on-disk block allocation strategy. |
| 259 | why? Because, if you undo a delete, you need to ensure you haven't reused any |
| 260 | of the freed blocks in a later transaction. One simple way of doing this |
| 261 | is make sure any blocks you allocate only have checkpointed transactions |
| 262 | listed against them. Ext3 does this in ext3_test_allocatable(). |
| 263 | </para> |
| 264 | |
| 265 | <para> |
| 266 | Lock is also providing through journal_{un,}lock_updates(), |
| 267 | ext3 uses this when it wants a window with a clean and stable fs for a moment. |
| 268 | eg. |
| 269 | </para> |
| 270 | |
| 271 | <programlisting> |
| 272 | |
| 273 | journal_lock_updates() //stop new stuff happening.. |
| 274 | journal_flush() // checkpoint everything. |
| 275 | ..do stuff on stable fs |
| 276 | journal_unlock_updates() // carry on with filesystem use. |
| 277 | </programlisting> |
| 278 | |
| 279 | <para> |
| 280 | The opportunities for abuse and DOS attacks with this should be obvious, |
| 281 | if you allow unprivileged userspace to trigger codepaths containing these |
| 282 | calls. |
| 283 | </para> |
| 284 | |
| 285 | <para> |
| 286 | A new feature of jbd since 2.5.25 is commit callbacks with the new |
| 287 | journal_callback_set() function you can now ask the journalling layer |
| 288 | to call you back when the transaction is finally committed to disk, so that |
| 289 | you can do some of your own management. The key to this is the journal_callback |
| 290 | struct, this maintains the internal callback information but you can |
| 291 | extend it like this:- |
| 292 | </para> |
| 293 | <programlisting> |
| 294 | struct myfs_callback_s { |
| 295 | //Data structure element required by jbd.. |
| 296 | struct journal_callback for_jbd; |
| 297 | // Stuff for myfs allocated together. |
| 298 | myfs_inode* i_commited; |
| 299 | |
| 300 | } |
| 301 | </programlisting> |
| 302 | |
| 303 | <para> |
| 304 | this would be useful if you needed to know when data was committed to a |
| 305 | particular inode. |
| 306 | </para> |
| 307 | |
| 308 | </sect2> |
| 309 | |
| 310 | <sect2> |
| 311 | <title>Summary</title> |
| 312 | <para> |
| 313 | Using the journal is a matter of wrapping the different context changes, |
| 314 | being each mount, each modification (transaction) and each changed buffer |
| 315 | to tell the journalling layer about them. |
| 316 | </para> |
| 317 | |
| 318 | <para> |
| 319 | Here is a some pseudo code to give you an idea of how it works, as |
| 320 | an example. |
| 321 | </para> |
| 322 | |
| 323 | <programlisting> |
| 324 | journal_t* my_jnrl = journal_create(); |
| 325 | journal_init_{dev,inode}(jnrl,...) |
| 326 | if (clean) journal_wipe(); |
| 327 | journal_load(); |
| 328 | |
| 329 | foreach(transaction) { /*transactions must be |
| 330 | completed before |
| 331 | a syscall returns to |
| 332 | userspace*/ |
| 333 | |
| 334 | handle_t * xct=journal_start(my_jnrl); |
| 335 | foreach(bh) { |
| 336 | journal_get_{create,write,undo}_access(xact,bh); |
| 337 | if ( myfs_modify(bh) ) { /* returns true |
| 338 | if makes changes */ |
| 339 | journal_dirty_{meta,}data(xact,bh); |
| 340 | } else { |
| 341 | journal_forget(bh); |
| 342 | } |
| 343 | } |
| 344 | journal_stop(xct); |
| 345 | } |
| 346 | journal_destroy(my_jrnl); |
| 347 | </programlisting> |
| 348 | </sect2> |
| 349 | |
| 350 | </sect1> |
| 351 | |
| 352 | <sect1> |
| 353 | <title>Data Types</title> |
| 354 | <para> |
| 355 | The journalling layer uses typedefs to 'hide' the concrete definitions |
| 356 | of the structures used. As a client of the JBD layer you can |
| 357 | just rely on the using the pointer as a magic cookie of some sort. |
| 358 | |
| 359 | Obviously the hiding is not enforced as this is 'C'. |
| 360 | </para> |
| 361 | <sect2><title>Structures</title> |
| 362 | !Iinclude/linux/jbd.h |
| 363 | </sect2> |
| 364 | </sect1> |
| 365 | |
| 366 | <sect1> |
| 367 | <title>Functions</title> |
| 368 | <para> |
| 369 | The functions here are split into two groups those that |
| 370 | affect a journal as a whole, and those which are used to |
| 371 | manage transactions |
| 372 | </para> |
| 373 | <sect2><title>Journal Level</title> |
| 374 | !Efs/jbd/journal.c |
| 375 | !Ifs/jbd/recovery.c |
| 376 | </sect2> |
| 377 | <sect2><title>Transasction Level</title> |
| 378 | !Efs/jbd/transaction.c |
| 379 | </sect2> |
| 380 | </sect1> |
| 381 | <sect1> |
| 382 | <title>See also</title> |
| 383 | <para> |
| 384 | <citation> |
| 385 | <ulink url="ftp://ftp.uk.linux.org/pub/linux/sct/fs/jfs/journal-design.ps.gz"> |
| 386 | Journaling the Linux ext2fs Filesystem, LinuxExpo 98, Stephen Tweedie |
| 387 | </ulink> |
| 388 | </citation> |
| 389 | </para> |
| 390 | <para> |
| 391 | <citation> |
| 392 | <ulink url="http://olstrans.sourceforge.net/release/OLS2000-ext3/OLS2000-ext3.html"> |
| 393 | Ext3 Journalling FileSystem, OLS 2000, Dr. Stephen Tweedie |
| 394 | </ulink> |
| 395 | </citation> |
| 396 | </para> |
| 397 | </sect1> |
| 398 | |
| 399 | </chapter> |
| 400 | |
Randy Dunlap | bbb5bbb | 2006-10-29 22:46:40 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 401 | </book> |