blob: ad6ded4bca5cb8235a3ca5a4d85bc101bab38511 [file] [log] [blame]
Ohad Ben-Cohen400e64d2011-10-20 16:52:46 +02001Remote Processor Framework
2
31. Introduction
4
5Modern SoCs typically have heterogeneous remote processor devices in asymmetric
6multiprocessing (AMP) configurations, which may be running different instances
7of operating system, whether it's Linux or any other flavor of real-time OS.
8
9OMAP4, for example, has dual Cortex-A9, dual Cortex-M3 and a C64x+ DSP.
10In a typical configuration, the dual cortex-A9 is running Linux in a SMP
11configuration, and each of the other three cores (two M3 cores and a DSP)
12is running its own instance of RTOS in an AMP configuration.
13
14The remoteproc framework allows different platforms/architectures to
15control (power on, load firmware, power off) those remote processors while
16abstracting the hardware differences, so the entire driver doesn't need to be
17duplicated. In addition, this framework also adds rpmsg virtio devices
18for remote processors that supports this kind of communication. This way,
19platform-specific remoteproc drivers only need to provide a few low-level
20handlers, and then all rpmsg drivers will then just work
21(for more information about the virtio-based rpmsg bus and its drivers,
22please read Documentation/rpmsg.txt).
Ohad Ben-Cohen7a186942012-02-13 22:30:39 +010023Registration of other types of virtio devices is now also possible. Firmwares
24just need to publish what kind of virtio devices do they support, and then
25remoteproc will add those devices. This makes it possible to reuse the
26existing virtio drivers with remote processor backends at a minimal development
27cost.
Ohad Ben-Cohen400e64d2011-10-20 16:52:46 +020028
292. User API
30
31 int rproc_boot(struct rproc *rproc)
32 - Boot a remote processor (i.e. load its firmware, power it on, ...).
33 If the remote processor is already powered on, this function immediately
34 returns (successfully).
35 Returns 0 on success, and an appropriate error value otherwise.
36 Note: to use this function you should already have a valid rproc
37 handle. There are several ways to achieve that cleanly (devres, pdata,
38 the way remoteproc_rpmsg.c does this, or, if this becomes prevalent, we
39 might also consider using dev_archdata for this). See also
40 rproc_get_by_name() below.
41
42 void rproc_shutdown(struct rproc *rproc)
43 - Power off a remote processor (previously booted with rproc_boot()).
44 In case @rproc is still being used by an additional user(s), then
45 this function will just decrement the power refcount and exit,
46 without really powering off the device.
47 Every call to rproc_boot() must (eventually) be accompanied by a call
48 to rproc_shutdown(). Calling rproc_shutdown() redundantly is a bug.
49 Notes:
50 - we're not decrementing the rproc's refcount, only the power refcount.
51 which means that the @rproc handle stays valid even after
52 rproc_shutdown() returns, and users can still use it with a subsequent
53 rproc_boot(), if needed.
54 - don't call rproc_shutdown() to unroll rproc_get_by_name(), exactly
55 because rproc_shutdown() _does not_ decrement the refcount of @rproc.
56 To decrement the refcount of @rproc, use rproc_put() (but _only_ if
57 you acquired @rproc using rproc_get_by_name()).
58
59 struct rproc *rproc_get_by_name(const char *name)
60 - Find an rproc handle using the remote processor's name, and then
61 boot it. If it's already powered on, then just immediately return
62 (successfully). Returns the rproc handle on success, and NULL on failure.
63 This function increments the remote processor's refcount, so always
64 use rproc_put() to decrement it back once rproc isn't needed anymore.
65 Note: currently rproc_get_by_name() and rproc_put() are not used anymore
66 by the rpmsg bus and its drivers. We need to scrutinize the use cases
67 that still need them, and see if we can migrate them to use the non
68 name-based boot/shutdown interface.
69
70 void rproc_put(struct rproc *rproc)
71 - Decrement @rproc's power refcount and shut it down if it reaches zero
72 (essentially by just calling rproc_shutdown), and then decrement @rproc's
73 validity refcount too.
74 After this function returns, @rproc may _not_ be used anymore, and its
75 handle should be considered invalid.
76 This function should be called _iff_ the @rproc handle was grabbed by
77 calling rproc_get_by_name().
78
793. Typical usage
80
81#include <linux/remoteproc.h>
82
83/* in case we were given a valid 'rproc' handle */
84int dummy_rproc_example(struct rproc *my_rproc)
85{
86 int ret;
87
88 /* let's power on and boot our remote processor */
89 ret = rproc_boot(my_rproc);
90 if (ret) {
91 /*
92 * something went wrong. handle it and leave.
93 */
94 }
95
96 /*
97 * our remote processor is now powered on... give it some work
98 */
99
100 /* let's shut it down now */
101 rproc_shutdown(my_rproc);
102}
103
1044. API for implementors
105
106 struct rproc *rproc_alloc(struct device *dev, const char *name,
107 const struct rproc_ops *ops,
108 const char *firmware, int len)
109 - Allocate a new remote processor handle, but don't register
110 it yet. Required parameters are the underlying device, the
111 name of this remote processor, platform-specific ops handlers,
112 the name of the firmware to boot this rproc with, and the
113 length of private data needed by the allocating rproc driver (in bytes).
114
115 This function should be used by rproc implementations during
116 initialization of the remote processor.
117 After creating an rproc handle using this function, and when ready,
118 implementations should then call rproc_register() to complete
119 the registration of the remote processor.
120 On success, the new rproc is returned, and on failure, NULL.
121
122 Note: _never_ directly deallocate @rproc, even if it was not registered
Ohad Ben-Cohenc6b5a272012-07-02 11:41:16 +0300123 yet. Instead, when you need to unroll rproc_alloc(), use rproc_free().
Ohad Ben-Cohen400e64d2011-10-20 16:52:46 +0200124
125 void rproc_free(struct rproc *rproc)
126 - Free an rproc handle that was allocated by rproc_alloc.
Ohad Ben-Cohenc6b5a272012-07-02 11:41:16 +0300127 This function essentially unrolls rproc_alloc(), by decrementing the
128 rproc's refcount. It doesn't directly free rproc; that would happen
129 only if there are no other references to rproc and its refcount now
130 dropped to zero.
Ohad Ben-Cohen400e64d2011-10-20 16:52:46 +0200131
132 int rproc_register(struct rproc *rproc)
133 - Register @rproc with the remoteproc framework, after it has been
134 allocated with rproc_alloc().
135 This is called by the platform-specific rproc implementation, whenever
136 a new remote processor device is probed.
137 Returns 0 on success and an appropriate error code otherwise.
138 Note: this function initiates an asynchronous firmware loading
139 context, which will look for virtio devices supported by the rproc's
140 firmware.
141 If found, those virtio devices will be created and added, so as a result
142 of registering this remote processor, additional virtio drivers might get
143 probed.
Ohad Ben-Cohen400e64d2011-10-20 16:52:46 +0200144
145 int rproc_unregister(struct rproc *rproc)
Ohad Ben-Cohenc6b5a272012-07-02 11:41:16 +0300146 - Unroll rproc_register().
Ohad Ben-Cohen400e64d2011-10-20 16:52:46 +0200147 This function should be called when the platform specific rproc
148 implementation decides to remove the rproc device. it should
149 _only_ be called if a previous invocation of rproc_register()
150 has completed successfully.
151
Ohad Ben-Cohenc6b5a272012-07-02 11:41:16 +0300152 After rproc_unregister() returns, @rproc is still valid, and its
153 last refcount should be decremented by calling rproc_free().
Ohad Ben-Cohen400e64d2011-10-20 16:52:46 +0200154
155 Returns 0 on success and -EINVAL if @rproc isn't valid.
156
1575. Implementation callbacks
158
159These callbacks should be provided by platform-specific remoteproc
160drivers:
161
162/**
163 * struct rproc_ops - platform-specific device handlers
164 * @start: power on the device and boot it
165 * @stop: power off the device
166 * @kick: kick a virtqueue (virtqueue id given as a parameter)
167 */
168struct rproc_ops {
169 int (*start)(struct rproc *rproc);
170 int (*stop)(struct rproc *rproc);
171 void (*kick)(struct rproc *rproc, int vqid);
172};
173
174Every remoteproc implementation should at least provide the ->start and ->stop
Ohad Ben-Cohen7a186942012-02-13 22:30:39 +0100175handlers. If rpmsg/virtio functionality is also desired, then the ->kick handler
Ohad Ben-Cohen400e64d2011-10-20 16:52:46 +0200176should be provided as well.
177
178The ->start() handler takes an rproc handle and should then power on the
179device and boot it (use rproc->priv to access platform-specific private data).
180The boot address, in case needed, can be found in rproc->bootaddr (remoteproc
181core puts there the ELF entry point).
182On success, 0 should be returned, and on failure, an appropriate error code.
183
184The ->stop() handler takes an rproc handle and powers the device down.
185On success, 0 is returned, and on failure, an appropriate error code.
186
187The ->kick() handler takes an rproc handle, and an index of a virtqueue
188where new message was placed in. Implementations should interrupt the remote
189processor and let it know it has pending messages. Notifying remote processors
190the exact virtqueue index to look in is optional: it is easy (and not
191too expensive) to go through the existing virtqueues and look for new buffers
192in the used rings.
193
1946. Binary Firmware Structure
195
196At this point remoteproc only supports ELF32 firmware binaries. However,
197it is quite expected that other platforms/devices which we'd want to
198support with this framework will be based on different binary formats.
199
200When those use cases show up, we will have to decouple the binary format
201from the framework core, so we can support several binary formats without
202duplicating common code.
203
204When the firmware is parsed, its various segments are loaded to memory
205according to the specified device address (might be a physical address
206if the remote processor is accessing memory directly).
207
208In addition to the standard ELF segments, most remote processors would
209also include a special section which we call "the resource table".
210
211The resource table contains system resources that the remote processor
212requires before it should be powered on, such as allocation of physically
213contiguous memory, or iommu mapping of certain on-chip peripherals.
214Remotecore will only power up the device after all the resource table's
215requirement are met.
216
217In addition to system resources, the resource table may also contain
218resource entries that publish the existence of supported features
219or configurations by the remote processor, such as trace buffers and
220supported virtio devices (and their configurations).
221
Ohad Ben-Cohenfd2c15e2012-02-01 21:56:16 +0200222The resource table begins with this header:
Ohad Ben-Cohen400e64d2011-10-20 16:52:46 +0200223
224/**
Ohad Ben-Cohenfd2c15e2012-02-01 21:56:16 +0200225 * struct resource_table - firmware resource table header
226 * @ver: version number
227 * @num: number of resource entries
228 * @reserved: reserved (must be zero)
229 * @offset: array of offsets pointing at the various resource entries
230 *
231 * The header of the resource table, as expressed by this structure,
232 * contains a version number (should we need to change this format in the
233 * future), the number of available resource entries, and their offsets
234 * in the table.
Ohad Ben-Cohen400e64d2011-10-20 16:52:46 +0200235 */
Ohad Ben-Cohenfd2c15e2012-02-01 21:56:16 +0200236struct resource_table {
237 u32 ver;
238 u32 num;
239 u32 reserved[2];
240 u32 offset[0];
241} __packed;
242
243Immediately following this header are the resource entries themselves,
244each of which begins with the following resource entry header:
245
246/**
247 * struct fw_rsc_hdr - firmware resource entry header
248 * @type: resource type
249 * @data: resource data
250 *
251 * Every resource entry begins with a 'struct fw_rsc_hdr' header providing
252 * its @type. The content of the entry itself will immediately follow
253 * this header, and it should be parsed according to the resource type.
254 */
255struct fw_rsc_hdr {
Ohad Ben-Cohen400e64d2011-10-20 16:52:46 +0200256 u32 type;
Ohad Ben-Cohenfd2c15e2012-02-01 21:56:16 +0200257 u8 data[0];
Ohad Ben-Cohen400e64d2011-10-20 16:52:46 +0200258} __packed;
259
260Some resources entries are mere announcements, where the host is informed
261of specific remoteproc configuration. Other entries require the host to
Ohad Ben-Cohenfd2c15e2012-02-01 21:56:16 +0200262do something (e.g. allocate a system resource). Sometimes a negotiation
263is expected, where the firmware requests a resource, and once allocated,
264the host should provide back its details (e.g. address of an allocated
265memory region).
Ohad Ben-Cohen400e64d2011-10-20 16:52:46 +0200266
Ohad Ben-Cohenfd2c15e2012-02-01 21:56:16 +0200267Here are the various resource types that are currently supported:
Ohad Ben-Cohen400e64d2011-10-20 16:52:46 +0200268
269/**
270 * enum fw_resource_type - types of resource entries
271 *
272 * @RSC_CARVEOUT: request for allocation of a physically contiguous
273 * memory region.
274 * @RSC_DEVMEM: request to iommu_map a memory-based peripheral.
275 * @RSC_TRACE: announces the availability of a trace buffer into which
Ohad Ben-Cohenfd2c15e2012-02-01 21:56:16 +0200276 * the remote processor will be writing logs.
277 * @RSC_VDEV: declare support for a virtio device, and serve as its
278 * virtio header.
279 * @RSC_LAST: just keep this one at the end
280 *
281 * Please note that these values are used as indices to the rproc_handle_rsc
282 * lookup table, so please keep them sane. Moreover, @RSC_LAST is used to
283 * check the validity of an index before the lookup table is accessed, so
284 * please update it as needed.
Ohad Ben-Cohen400e64d2011-10-20 16:52:46 +0200285 */
286enum fw_resource_type {
287 RSC_CARVEOUT = 0,
288 RSC_DEVMEM = 1,
289 RSC_TRACE = 2,
Ohad Ben-Cohenfd2c15e2012-02-01 21:56:16 +0200290 RSC_VDEV = 3,
291 RSC_LAST = 4,
Ohad Ben-Cohen400e64d2011-10-20 16:52:46 +0200292};
293
Ohad Ben-Cohenfd2c15e2012-02-01 21:56:16 +0200294For more details regarding a specific resource type, please see its
295dedicated structure in include/linux/remoteproc.h.
Ohad Ben-Cohen400e64d2011-10-20 16:52:46 +0200296
297We also expect that platform-specific resource entries will show up
Ohad Ben-Cohenfd2c15e2012-02-01 21:56:16 +0200298at some point. When that happens, we could easily add a new RSC_PLATFORM
Ohad Ben-Cohen400e64d2011-10-20 16:52:46 +0200299type, and hand those resources to the platform-specific rproc driver to handle.
300
3017. Virtio and remoteproc
302
303The firmware should provide remoteproc information about virtio devices
Ohad Ben-Cohenfd2c15e2012-02-01 21:56:16 +0200304that it supports, and their configurations: a RSC_VDEV resource entry
305should specify the virtio device id (as in virtio_ids.h), virtio features,
306virtio config space, vrings information, etc.
Ohad Ben-Cohen400e64d2011-10-20 16:52:46 +0200307
Ohad Ben-Cohenfd2c15e2012-02-01 21:56:16 +0200308When a new remote processor is registered, the remoteproc framework
309will look for its resource table and will register the virtio devices
310it supports. A firmware may support any number of virtio devices, and
311of any type (a single remote processor can also easily support several
312rpmsg virtio devices this way, if desired).
Ohad Ben-Cohen400e64d2011-10-20 16:52:46 +0200313
Ohad Ben-Cohenfd2c15e2012-02-01 21:56:16 +0200314Of course, RSC_VDEV resource entries are only good enough for static
Ohad Ben-Cohen400e64d2011-10-20 16:52:46 +0200315allocation of virtio devices. Dynamic allocations will also be made possible
316using the rpmsg bus (similar to how we already do dynamic allocations of
317rpmsg channels; read more about it in rpmsg.txt).