Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo | 94cdda6 | 2015-05-07 17:27:23 -0300 | [diff] [blame] | 1 | #ifndef __TOOLS_LINUX_SPARC64_BARRIER_H |
| 2 | #define __TOOLS_LINUX_SPARC64_BARRIER_H |
| 3 | |
| 4 | /* Copied from the kernel sources to tools/: |
| 5 | * |
| 6 | * These are here in an effort to more fully work around Spitfire Errata |
| 7 | * #51. Essentially, if a memory barrier occurs soon after a mispredicted |
| 8 | * branch, the chip can stop executing instructions until a trap occurs. |
| 9 | * Therefore, if interrupts are disabled, the chip can hang forever. |
| 10 | * |
| 11 | * It used to be believed that the memory barrier had to be right in the |
| 12 | * delay slot, but a case has been traced recently wherein the memory barrier |
| 13 | * was one instruction after the branch delay slot and the chip still hung. |
| 14 | * The offending sequence was the following in sym_wakeup_done() of the |
| 15 | * sym53c8xx_2 driver: |
| 16 | * |
| 17 | * call sym_ccb_from_dsa, 0 |
| 18 | * movge %icc, 0, %l0 |
| 19 | * brz,pn %o0, .LL1303 |
| 20 | * mov %o0, %l2 |
| 21 | * membar #LoadLoad |
| 22 | * |
| 23 | * The branch has to be mispredicted for the bug to occur. Therefore, we put |
| 24 | * the memory barrier explicitly into a "branch always, predicted taken" |
| 25 | * delay slot to avoid the problem case. |
| 26 | */ |
| 27 | #define membar_safe(type) \ |
| 28 | do { __asm__ __volatile__("ba,pt %%xcc, 1f\n\t" \ |
| 29 | " membar " type "\n" \ |
| 30 | "1:\n" \ |
| 31 | : : : "memory"); \ |
| 32 | } while (0) |
| 33 | |
| 34 | /* The kernel always executes in TSO memory model these days, |
| 35 | * and furthermore most sparc64 chips implement more stringent |
| 36 | * memory ordering than required by the specifications. |
| 37 | */ |
| 38 | #define mb() membar_safe("#StoreLoad") |
| 39 | #define rmb() __asm__ __volatile__("":::"memory") |
| 40 | #define wmb() __asm__ __volatile__("":::"memory") |
| 41 | |
| 42 | #endif /* !(__TOOLS_LINUX_SPARC64_BARRIER_H) */ |