blob: 77b36f59d16b452bbf12bba4e3db83ec3ea84a9f [file] [log] [blame]
Darren Hartb30505c2009-05-07 15:40:14 -07001Futex Requeue PI
2----------------
3
4Requeueing of tasks from a non-PI futex to a PI futex requires
5special handling in order to ensure the underlying rt_mutex is never
6left without an owner if it has waiters; doing so would break the PI
7boosting logic [see rt-mutex-desgin.txt] For the purposes of
8brevity, this action will be referred to as "requeue_pi" throughout
9this document. Priority inheritance is abbreviated throughout as
10"PI".
11
12Motivation
13----------
14
15Without requeue_pi, the glibc implementation of
16pthread_cond_broadcast() must resort to waking all the tasks waiting
17on a pthread_condvar and letting them try to sort out which task
18gets to run first in classic thundering-herd formation. An ideal
19implementation would wake the highest-priority waiter, and leave the
20rest to the natural wakeup inherent in unlocking the mutex
21associated with the condvar.
22
23Consider the simplified glibc calls:
24
25/* caller must lock mutex */
26pthread_cond_wait(cond, mutex)
27{
28 lock(cond->__data.__lock);
29 unlock(mutex);
30 do {
31 unlock(cond->__data.__lock);
32 futex_wait(cond->__data.__futex);
33 lock(cond->__data.__lock);
34 } while(...)
35 unlock(cond->__data.__lock);
36 lock(mutex);
37}
38
39pthread_cond_broadcast(cond)
40{
41 lock(cond->__data.__lock);
42 unlock(cond->__data.__lock);
43 futex_requeue(cond->data.__futex, cond->mutex);
44}
45
46Once pthread_cond_broadcast() requeues the tasks, the cond->mutex
47has waiters. Note that pthread_cond_wait() attempts to lock the
48mutex only after it has returned to user space. This will leave the
49underlying rt_mutex with waiters, and no owner, breaking the
50previously mentioned PI-boosting algorithms.
51
52In order to support PI-aware pthread_condvar's, the kernel needs to
53be able to requeue tasks to PI futexes. This support implies that
54upon a successful futex_wait system call, the caller would return to
55user space already holding the PI futex. The glibc implementation
56would be modified as follows:
57
58
59/* caller must lock mutex */
60pthread_cond_wait_pi(cond, mutex)
61{
62 lock(cond->__data.__lock);
63 unlock(mutex);
64 do {
65 unlock(cond->__data.__lock);
66 futex_wait_requeue_pi(cond->__data.__futex);
67 lock(cond->__data.__lock);
68 } while(...)
69 unlock(cond->__data.__lock);
Masanari Iidadf5cbb22014-03-21 10:04:30 +090070 /* the kernel acquired the mutex for us */
Darren Hartb30505c2009-05-07 15:40:14 -070071}
72
73pthread_cond_broadcast_pi(cond)
74{
75 lock(cond->__data.__lock);
76 unlock(cond->__data.__lock);
77 futex_requeue_pi(cond->data.__futex, cond->mutex);
78}
79
80The actual glibc implementation will likely test for PI and make the
81necessary changes inside the existing calls rather than creating new
82calls for the PI cases. Similar changes are needed for
83pthread_cond_timedwait() and pthread_cond_signal().
84
85Implementation
86--------------
87
88In order to ensure the rt_mutex has an owner if it has waiters, it
89is necessary for both the requeue code, as well as the waiting code,
90to be able to acquire the rt_mutex before returning to user space.
91The requeue code cannot simply wake the waiter and leave it to
92acquire the rt_mutex as it would open a race window between the
93requeue call returning to user space and the waiter waking and
94starting to run. This is especially true in the uncontended case.
95
96The solution involves two new rt_mutex helper routines,
97rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock() and rt_mutex_finish_proxy_lock(), which
98allow the requeue code to acquire an uncontended rt_mutex on behalf
99of the waiter and to enqueue the waiter on a contended rt_mutex.
100Two new system calls provide the kernel<->user interface to
Michael Kerrisk40a35502015-01-16 20:27:57 +0100101requeue_pi: FUTEX_WAIT_REQUEUE_PI and FUTEX_CMP_REQUEUE_PI.
Darren Hartb30505c2009-05-07 15:40:14 -0700102
103FUTEX_WAIT_REQUEUE_PI is called by the waiter (pthread_cond_wait()
104and pthread_cond_timedwait()) to block on the initial futex and wait
105to be requeued to a PI-aware futex. The implementation is the
106result of a high-speed collision between futex_wait() and
107futex_lock_pi(), with some extra logic to check for the additional
108wake-up scenarios.
109
Michael Kerrisk40a35502015-01-16 20:27:57 +0100110FUTEX_CMP_REQUEUE_PI is called by the waker
Darren Hartb30505c2009-05-07 15:40:14 -0700111(pthread_cond_broadcast() and pthread_cond_signal()) to requeue and
112possibly wake the waiting tasks. Internally, this system call is
113still handled by futex_requeue (by passing requeue_pi=1). Before
114requeueing, futex_requeue() attempts to acquire the requeue target
115PI futex on behalf of the top waiter. If it can, this waiter is
116woken. futex_requeue() then proceeds to requeue the remaining
117nr_wake+nr_requeue tasks to the PI futex, calling
118rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock() prior to each requeue to prepare the
119task as a waiter on the underlying rt_mutex. It is possible that
120the lock can be acquired at this stage as well, if so, the next
121waiter is woken to finish the acquisition of the lock.
122
Michael Kerrisk40a35502015-01-16 20:27:57 +0100123FUTEX_CMP_REQUEUE_PI accepts nr_wake and nr_requeue as arguments, but
Darren Hartb30505c2009-05-07 15:40:14 -0700124their sum is all that really matters. futex_requeue() will wake or
125requeue up to nr_wake + nr_requeue tasks. It will wake only as many
126tasks as it can acquire the lock for, which in the majority of cases
127should be 0 as good programming practice dictates that the caller of
128either pthread_cond_broadcast() or pthread_cond_signal() acquire the
Michael Kerrisk40a35502015-01-16 20:27:57 +0100129mutex prior to making the call. FUTEX_CMP_REQUEUE_PI requires that
Darren Hartb30505c2009-05-07 15:40:14 -0700130nr_wake=1. nr_requeue should be INT_MAX for broadcast and 0 for
131signal.