blob: af6865b822d21d18946016c1458a4dc3567050e9 [file] [log] [blame]
Pawan Guptaba54aad2019-10-23 12:32:55 +02001.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
2
3TAA - TSX Asynchronous Abort
4======================================
5
6TAA is a hardware vulnerability that allows unprivileged speculative access to
7data which is available in various CPU internal buffers by using asynchronous
8aborts within an Intel TSX transactional region.
9
10Affected processors
11-------------------
12
13This vulnerability only affects Intel processors that support Intel
14Transactional Synchronization Extensions (TSX) when the TAA_NO bit (bit 8)
15is 0 in the IA32_ARCH_CAPABILITIES MSR. On processors where the MDS_NO bit
16(bit 5) is 0 in the IA32_ARCH_CAPABILITIES MSR, the existing MDS mitigations
17also mitigate against TAA.
18
19Whether a processor is affected or not can be read out from the TAA
20vulnerability file in sysfs. See :ref:`tsx_async_abort_sys_info`.
21
22Related CVEs
23------------
24
25The following CVE entry is related to this TAA issue:
26
27 ============== ===== ===================================================
28 CVE-2019-11135 TAA TSX Asynchronous Abort (TAA) condition on some
29 microprocessors utilizing speculative execution may
30 allow an authenticated user to potentially enable
31 information disclosure via a side channel with
32 local access.
33 ============== ===== ===================================================
34
35Problem
36-------
37
38When performing store, load or L1 refill operations, processors write
39data into temporary microarchitectural structures (buffers). The data in
40those buffers can be forwarded to load operations as an optimization.
41
42Intel TSX is an extension to the x86 instruction set architecture that adds
43hardware transactional memory support to improve performance of multi-threaded
44software. TSX lets the processor expose and exploit concurrency hidden in an
45application due to dynamically avoiding unnecessary synchronization.
46
47TSX supports atomic memory transactions that are either committed (success) or
48aborted. During an abort, operations that happened within the transactional region
49are rolled back. An asynchronous abort takes place, among other options, when a
50different thread accesses a cache line that is also used within the transactional
51region when that access might lead to a data race.
52
53Immediately after an uncompleted asynchronous abort, certain speculatively
54executed loads may read data from those internal buffers and pass it to dependent
55operations. This can be then used to infer the value via a cache side channel
56attack.
57
58Because the buffers are potentially shared between Hyper-Threads cross
59Hyper-Thread attacks are possible.
60
61The victim of a malicious actor does not need to make use of TSX. Only the
62attacker needs to begin a TSX transaction and raise an asynchronous abort
63which in turn potenitally leaks data stored in the buffers.
64
65More detailed technical information is available in the TAA specific x86
66architecture section: :ref:`Documentation/x86/tsx_async_abort.rst <tsx_async_abort>`.
67
68
69Attack scenarios
70----------------
71
72Attacks against the TAA vulnerability can be implemented from unprivileged
73applications running on hosts or guests.
74
75As for MDS, the attacker has no control over the memory addresses that can
76be leaked. Only the victim is responsible for bringing data to the CPU. As
77a result, the malicious actor has to sample as much data as possible and
78then postprocess it to try to infer any useful information from it.
79
80A potential attacker only has read access to the data. Also, there is no direct
81privilege escalation by using this technique.
82
83
84.. _tsx_async_abort_sys_info:
85
86TAA system information
87-----------------------
88
89The Linux kernel provides a sysfs interface to enumerate the current TAA status
90of mitigated systems. The relevant sysfs file is:
91
92/sys/devices/system/cpu/vulnerabilities/tsx_async_abort
93
94The possible values in this file are:
95
96.. list-table::
97
98 * - 'Vulnerable'
99 - The CPU is affected by this vulnerability and the microcode and kernel mitigation are not applied.
100 * - 'Vulnerable: Clear CPU buffers attempted, no microcode'
101 - The system tries to clear the buffers but the microcode might not support the operation.
102 * - 'Mitigation: Clear CPU buffers'
103 - The microcode has been updated to clear the buffers. TSX is still enabled.
104 * - 'Mitigation: TSX disabled'
105 - TSX is disabled.
106 * - 'Not affected'
107 - The CPU is not affected by this issue.
108
109.. _ucode_needed:
110
111Best effort mitigation mode
112^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
113
114If the processor is vulnerable, but the availability of the microcode-based
115mitigation mechanism is not advertised via CPUID the kernel selects a best
116effort mitigation mode. This mode invokes the mitigation instructions
117without a guarantee that they clear the CPU buffers.
118
119This is done to address virtualization scenarios where the host has the
120microcode update applied, but the hypervisor is not yet updated to expose the
121CPUID to the guest. If the host has updated microcode the protection takes
122effect; otherwise a few CPU cycles are wasted pointlessly.
123
124The state in the tsx_async_abort sysfs file reflects this situation
125accordingly.
126
127
128Mitigation mechanism
129--------------------
130
131The kernel detects the affected CPUs and the presence of the microcode which is
132required. If a CPU is affected and the microcode is available, then the kernel
133enables the mitigation by default.
134
135
136The mitigation can be controlled at boot time via a kernel command line option.
137See :ref:`taa_mitigation_control_command_line`.
138
139.. _virt_mechanism:
140
141Virtualization mitigation
142^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
143
144Affected systems where the host has TAA microcode and TAA is mitigated by
145having disabled TSX previously, are not vulnerable regardless of the status
146of the VMs.
147
148In all other cases, if the host either does not have the TAA microcode or
149the kernel is not mitigated, the system might be vulnerable.
150
151
152.. _taa_mitigation_control_command_line:
153
154Mitigation control on the kernel command line
155---------------------------------------------
156
157The kernel command line allows to control the TAA mitigations at boot time with
158the option "tsx_async_abort=". The valid arguments for this option are:
159
160 ============ =============================================================
161 off This option disables the TAA mitigation on affected platforms.
162 If the system has TSX enabled (see next parameter) and the CPU
163 is affected, the system is vulnerable.
164
165 full TAA mitigation is enabled. If TSX is enabled, on an affected
166 system it will clear CPU buffers on ring transitions. On
167 systems which are MDS-affected and deploy MDS mitigation,
168 TAA is also mitigated. Specifying this option on those
169 systems will have no effect.
170
171 full,nosmt The same as tsx_async_abort=full, with SMT disabled on
172 vulnerable CPUs that have TSX enabled. This is the complete
173 mitigation. When TSX is disabled, SMT is not disabled because
174 CPU is not vulnerable to cross-thread TAA attacks.
175 ============ =============================================================
176
Waiman Long5aba0ad2019-11-15 11:14:44 -0500177Not specifying this option is equivalent to "tsx_async_abort=full". For
178processors that are affected by both TAA and MDS, specifying just
179"tsx_async_abort=off" without an accompanying "mds=off" will have no
180effect as the same mitigation is used for both vulnerabilities.
Pawan Guptaba54aad2019-10-23 12:32:55 +0200181
182The kernel command line also allows to control the TSX feature using the
183parameter "tsx=" on CPUs which support TSX control. MSR_IA32_TSX_CTRL is used
184to control the TSX feature and the enumeration of the TSX feature bits (RTM
185and HLE) in CPUID.
186
187The valid options are:
188
189 ============ =============================================================
190 off Disables TSX on the system.
191
192 Note that this option takes effect only on newer CPUs which are
193 not vulnerable to MDS, i.e., have MSR_IA32_ARCH_CAPABILITIES.MDS_NO=1
194 and which get the new IA32_TSX_CTRL MSR through a microcode
195 update. This new MSR allows for the reliable deactivation of
196 the TSX functionality.
197
198 on Enables TSX.
199
200 Although there are mitigations for all known security
201 vulnerabilities, TSX has been known to be an accelerator for
202 several previous speculation-related CVEs, and so there may be
203 unknown security risks associated with leaving it enabled.
204
205 auto Disables TSX if X86_BUG_TAA is present, otherwise enables TSX
206 on the system.
207 ============ =============================================================
208
209Not specifying this option is equivalent to "tsx=off".
210
211The following combinations of the "tsx_async_abort" and "tsx" are possible. For
212affected platforms tsx=auto is equivalent to tsx=off and the result will be:
213
214 ========= ========================== =========================================
215 tsx=on tsx_async_abort=full The system will use VERW to clear CPU
216 buffers. Cross-thread attacks are still
217 possible on SMT machines.
218 tsx=on tsx_async_abort=full,nosmt As above, cross-thread attacks on SMT
219 mitigated.
220 tsx=on tsx_async_abort=off The system is vulnerable.
221 tsx=off tsx_async_abort=full TSX might be disabled if microcode
222 provides a TSX control MSR. If so,
223 system is not vulnerable.
224 tsx=off tsx_async_abort=full,nosmt Ditto
225 tsx=off tsx_async_abort=off ditto
226 ========= ========================== =========================================
227
228
229For unaffected platforms "tsx=on" and "tsx_async_abort=full" does not clear CPU
230buffers. For platforms without TSX control (MSR_IA32_ARCH_CAPABILITIES.MDS_NO=0)
231"tsx" command line argument has no effect.
232
233For the affected platforms below table indicates the mitigation status for the
234combinations of CPUID bit MD_CLEAR and IA32_ARCH_CAPABILITIES MSR bits MDS_NO
235and TSX_CTRL_MSR.
236
237 ======= ========= ============= ========================================
238 MDS_NO MD_CLEAR TSX_CTRL_MSR Status
239 ======= ========= ============= ========================================
240 0 0 0 Vulnerable (needs microcode)
241 0 1 0 MDS and TAA mitigated via VERW
242 1 1 0 MDS fixed, TAA vulnerable if TSX enabled
243 because MD_CLEAR has no meaning and
244 VERW is not guaranteed to clear buffers
245 1 X 1 MDS fixed, TAA can be mitigated by
246 VERW or TSX_CTRL_MSR
247 ======= ========= ============= ========================================
248
249Mitigation selection guide
250--------------------------
251
2521. Trusted userspace and guests
253^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
254
255If all user space applications are from a trusted source and do not execute
256untrusted code which is supplied externally, then the mitigation can be
257disabled. The same applies to virtualized environments with trusted guests.
258
259
2602. Untrusted userspace and guests
261^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
262
263If there are untrusted applications or guests on the system, enabling TSX
264might allow a malicious actor to leak data from the host or from other
265processes running on the same physical core.
266
267If the microcode is available and the TSX is disabled on the host, attacks
268are prevented in a virtualized environment as well, even if the VMs do not
269explicitly enable the mitigation.
270
271
272.. _taa_default_mitigations:
273
274Default mitigations
275-------------------
276
277The kernel's default action for vulnerable processors is:
278
279 - Deploy TSX disable mitigation (tsx_async_abort=full tsx=off).