| GPIO Interfaces |
| |
| This provides an overview of GPIO access conventions on Linux. |
| |
| |
| What is a GPIO? |
| =============== |
| A "General Purpose Input/Output" (GPIO) is a flexible software-controlled |
| digital signal. They are provided from many kinds of chip, and are familiar |
| to Linux developers working with embedded and custom hardware. Each GPIO |
| represents a bit connected to a particular pin, or "ball" on Ball Grid Array |
| (BGA) packages. Board schematics show which external hardware connects to |
| which GPIOs. Drivers can be written generically, so that board setup code |
| passes such pin configuration data to drivers. |
| |
| System-on-Chip (SOC) processors heavily rely on GPIOs. In some cases, every |
| non-dedicated pin can be configured as a GPIO; and most chips have at least |
| several dozen of them. Programmable logic devices (like FPGAs) can easily |
| provide GPIOs; multifunction chips like power managers, and audio codecs |
| often have a few such pins to help with pin scarcity on SOCs; and there are |
| also "GPIO Expander" chips that connect using the I2C or SPI serial busses. |
| Most PC southbridges have a few dozen GPIO-capable pins (with only the BIOS |
| firmware knowing how they're used). |
| |
| The exact capabilities of GPIOs vary between systems. Common options: |
| |
| - Output values are writable (high=1, low=0). Some chips also have |
| options about how that value is driven, so that for example only one |
| value might be driven ... supporting "wire-OR" and similar schemes |
| for the other value. |
| |
| - Input values are likewise readable (1, 0). Some chips support readback |
| of pins configured as "output", which is very useful in such "wire-OR" |
| cases (to support bidirectional signaling). GPIO controllers may have |
| input de-glitch logic, sometimes with software controls. |
| |
| - Inputs can often be used as IRQ signals, often edge triggered but |
| sometimes level triggered. Such IRQs may be configurable as system |
| wakeup events, to wake the system from a low power state. |
| |
| - Usually a GPIO will be configurable as either input or output, as needed |
| by different product boards; single direction ones exist too. |
| |
| - Most GPIOs can be accessed while holding spinlocks, but those accessed |
| through a serial bus normally can't. Some systems support both types. |
| |
| On a given board each GPIO is used for one specific purpose like monitoring |
| MMC/SD card insertion/removal, detecting card writeprotect status, driving |
| a LED, configuring a transceiver, bitbanging a serial bus, poking a hardware |
| watchdog, sensing a switch, and so on. |
| |
| |
| GPIO conventions |
| ================ |
| Note that this is called a "convention" because you don't need to do it this |
| way, and it's no crime if you don't. There **are** cases where portability |
| is not the main issue; GPIOs are often used for the kind of board-specific |
| glue logic that may even change between board revisions, and can't ever be |
| used on a board that's wired differently. Only least-common-denominator |
| functionality can be very portable. Other features are platform-specific, |
| and that can be critical for glue logic. |
| |
| Plus, this doesn't define an implementation framework, just an interface. |
| One platform might implement it as simple inline functions accessing chip |
| registers; another might implement it by delegating through abstractions |
| used for several very different kinds of GPIO controller. |
| |
| That said, if the convention is supported on their platform, drivers should |
| use it when possible: |
| |
| #include <asm/gpio.h> |
| |
| If you stick to this convention then it'll be easier for other developers to |
| see what your code is doing, and help maintain it. |
| |
| |
| Identifying GPIOs |
| ----------------- |
| GPIOs are identified by unsigned integers in the range 0..MAX_INT. That |
| reserves "negative" numbers for other purposes like marking signals as |
| "not available on this board", or indicating faults. Code that doesn't |
| touch the underlying hardware treats these integers as opaque cookies. |
| |
| Platforms define how they use those integers, and usually #define symbols |
| for the GPIO lines so that board-specific setup code directly corresponds |
| to the relevant schematics. In contrast, drivers should only use GPIO |
| numbers passed to them from that setup code, using platform_data to hold |
| board-specific pin configuration data (along with other board specific |
| data they need). That avoids portability problems. |
| |
| So for example one platform uses numbers 32-159 for GPIOs; while another |
| uses numbers 0..63 with one set of GPIO controllers, 64-79 with another |
| type of GPIO controller, and on one particular board 80-95 with an FPGA. |
| The numbers need not be contiguous; either of those platforms could also |
| use numbers 2000-2063 to identify GPIOs in a bank of I2C GPIO expanders. |
| |
| Whether a platform supports multiple GPIO controllers is currently a |
| platform-specific implementation issue. |
| |
| |
| Using GPIOs |
| ----------- |
| One of the first things to do with a GPIO, often in board setup code when |
| setting up a platform_device using the GPIO, is mark its direction: |
| |
| /* set as input or output, returning 0 or negative errno */ |
| int gpio_direction_input(unsigned gpio); |
| int gpio_direction_output(unsigned gpio, int value); |
| |
| The return value is zero for success, else a negative errno. It should |
| be checked, since the get/set calls don't have error returns and since |
| misconfiguration is possible. (These calls could sleep.) |
| |
| For output GPIOs, the value provided becomes the initial output value. |
| This helps avoid signal glitching during system startup. |
| |
| Setting the direction can fail if the GPIO number is invalid, or when |
| that particular GPIO can't be used in that mode. It's generally a bad |
| idea to rely on boot firmware to have set the direction correctly, since |
| it probably wasn't validated to do more than boot Linux. (Similarly, |
| that board setup code probably needs to multiplex that pin as a GPIO, |
| and configure pullups/pulldowns appropriately.) |
| |
| |
| Spinlock-Safe GPIO access |
| ------------------------- |
| Most GPIO controllers can be accessed with memory read/write instructions. |
| That doesn't need to sleep, and can safely be done from inside IRQ handlers. |
| |
| Use these calls to access such GPIOs: |
| |
| /* GPIO INPUT: return zero or nonzero */ |
| int gpio_get_value(unsigned gpio); |
| |
| /* GPIO OUTPUT */ |
| void gpio_set_value(unsigned gpio, int value); |
| |
| The values are boolean, zero for low, nonzero for high. When reading the |
| value of an output pin, the value returned should be what's seen on the |
| pin ... that won't always match the specified output value, because of |
| issues including wire-OR and output latencies. |
| |
| The get/set calls have no error returns because "invalid GPIO" should have |
| been reported earlier in gpio_set_direction(). However, note that not all |
| platforms can read the value of output pins; those that can't should always |
| return zero. Also, using these calls for GPIOs that can't safely be accessed |
| without sleeping (see below) is an error. |
| |
| Platform-specific implementations are encouraged to optimize the two |
| calls to access the GPIO value in cases where the GPIO number (and for |
| output, value) are constant. It's normal for them to need only a couple |
| of instructions in such cases (reading or writing a hardware register), |
| and not to need spinlocks. Such optimized calls can make bitbanging |
| applications a lot more efficient (in both space and time) than spending |
| dozens of instructions on subroutine calls. |
| |
| |
| GPIO access that may sleep |
| -------------------------- |
| Some GPIO controllers must be accessed using message based busses like I2C |
| or SPI. Commands to read or write those GPIO values require waiting to |
| get to the head of a queue to transmit a command and get its response. |
| This requires sleeping, which can't be done from inside IRQ handlers. |
| |
| Platforms that support this type of GPIO distinguish them from other GPIOs |
| by returning nonzero from this call: |
| |
| int gpio_cansleep(unsigned gpio); |
| |
| To access such GPIOs, a different set of accessors is defined: |
| |
| /* GPIO INPUT: return zero or nonzero, might sleep */ |
| int gpio_get_value_cansleep(unsigned gpio); |
| |
| /* GPIO OUTPUT, might sleep */ |
| void gpio_set_value_cansleep(unsigned gpio, int value); |
| |
| Other than the fact that these calls might sleep, and will not be ignored |
| for GPIOs that can't be accessed from IRQ handlers, these calls act the |
| same as the spinlock-safe calls. |
| |
| |
| Claiming and Releasing GPIOs (OPTIONAL) |
| --------------------------------------- |
| To help catch system configuration errors, two calls are defined. |
| However, many platforms don't currently support this mechanism. |
| |
| /* request GPIO, returning 0 or negative errno. |
| * non-null labels may be useful for diagnostics. |
| */ |
| int gpio_request(unsigned gpio, const char *label); |
| |
| /* release previously-claimed GPIO */ |
| void gpio_free(unsigned gpio); |
| |
| Passing invalid GPIO numbers to gpio_request() will fail, as will requesting |
| GPIOs that have already been claimed with that call. The return value of |
| gpio_request() must be checked. (These calls could sleep.) |
| |
| These calls serve two basic purposes. One is marking the signals which |
| are actually in use as GPIOs, for better diagnostics; systems may have |
| several hundred potential GPIOs, but often only a dozen are used on any |
| given board. Another is to catch conflicts between drivers, reporting |
| errors when drivers wrongly think they have exclusive use of that signal. |
| |
| These two calls are optional because not not all current Linux platforms |
| offer such functionality in their GPIO support; a valid implementation |
| could return success for all gpio_request() calls. Unlike the other calls, |
| the state they represent doesn't normally match anything from a hardware |
| register; it's just a software bitmap which clearly is not necessary for |
| correct operation of hardware or (bug free) drivers. |
| |
| Note that requesting a GPIO does NOT cause it to be configured in any |
| way; it just marks that GPIO as in use. Separate code must handle any |
| pin setup (e.g. controlling which pin the GPIO uses, pullup/pulldown). |
| |
| |
| GPIOs mapped to IRQs |
| -------------------- |
| GPIO numbers are unsigned integers; so are IRQ numbers. These make up |
| two logically distinct namespaces (GPIO 0 need not use IRQ 0). You can |
| map between them using calls like: |
| |
| /* map GPIO numbers to IRQ numbers */ |
| int gpio_to_irq(unsigned gpio); |
| |
| /* map IRQ numbers to GPIO numbers */ |
| int irq_to_gpio(unsigned irq); |
| |
| Those return either the corresponding number in the other namespace, or |
| else a negative errno code if the mapping can't be done. (For example, |
| some GPIOs can't used as IRQs.) It is an unchecked error to use a GPIO |
| number that hasn't been marked as an input using gpio_set_direction(), or |
| to use an IRQ number that didn't originally come from gpio_to_irq(). |
| |
| These two mapping calls are expected to cost on the order of a single |
| addition or subtraction. They're not allowed to sleep. |
| |
| Non-error values returned from gpio_to_irq() can be passed to request_irq() |
| or free_irq(). They will often be stored into IRQ resources for platform |
| devices, by the board-specific initialization code. Note that IRQ trigger |
| options are part of the IRQ interface, e.g. IRQF_TRIGGER_FALLING, as are |
| system wakeup capabilities. |
| |
| Non-error values returned from irq_to_gpio() would most commonly be used |
| with gpio_get_value(), for example to initialize or update driver state |
| when the IRQ is edge-triggered. |
| |
| |
| |
| What do these conventions omit? |
| =============================== |
| One of the biggest things these conventions omit is pin multiplexing, since |
| this is highly chip-specific and nonportable. One platform might not need |
| explicit multiplexing; another might have just two options for use of any |
| given pin; another might have eight options per pin; another might be able |
| to route a given GPIO to any one of several pins. (Yes, those examples all |
| come from systems that run Linux today.) |
| |
| Related to multiplexing is configuration and enabling of the pullups or |
| pulldowns integrated on some platforms. Not all platforms support them, |
| or support them in the same way; and any given board might use external |
| pullups (or pulldowns) so that the on-chip ones should not be used. |
| |
| There are other system-specific mechanisms that are not specified here, |
| like the aforementioned options for input de-glitching and wire-OR output. |
| Hardware may support reading or writing GPIOs in gangs, but that's usually |
| configuration dependent: for GPIOs sharing the same bank. (GPIOs are |
| commonly grouped in banks of 16 or 32, with a given SOC having several such |
| banks.) Some systems can trigger IRQs from output GPIOs. Code relying on |
| such mechanisms will necessarily be nonportable. |
| |
| Dynamic definition of GPIOs is not currently supported; for example, as |
| a side effect of configuring an add-on board with some GPIO expanders. |
| |
| These calls are purely for kernel space, but a userspace API could be built |
| on top of it. |