blob: 8a2c52d5c53b7aaa9c2fcc5b684c0ac3dbcd53dc [file] [log] [blame]
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001================
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05002Control Group v2
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03003================
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05004
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03005:Date: October, 2015
6:Author: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05007
8This is the authoritative documentation on the design, interface and
9conventions of cgroup v2. It describes all userland-visible aspects
10of cgroup including core and specific controller behaviors. All
11future changes must be reflected in this document. Documentation for
W. Trevor King9a2ddda2016-01-27 13:01:52 -080012v1 is available under Documentation/cgroup-v1/.
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -050013
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -030014.. CONTENTS
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -050015
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -030016 1. Introduction
17 1-1. Terminology
18 1-2. What is cgroup?
19 2. Basic Operations
20 2-1. Mounting
Tejun Heo8cfd8142017-07-21 11:14:51 -040021 2-2. Organizing Processes and Threads
22 2-2-1. Processes
23 2-2-2. Threads
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -030024 2-3. [Un]populated Notification
25 2-4. Controlling Controllers
26 2-4-1. Enabling and Disabling
27 2-4-2. Top-down Constraint
28 2-4-3. No Internal Process Constraint
29 2-5. Delegation
30 2-5-1. Model of Delegation
31 2-5-2. Delegation Containment
32 2-6. Guidelines
33 2-6-1. Organize Once and Control
34 2-6-2. Avoid Name Collisions
35 3. Resource Distribution Models
36 3-1. Weights
37 3-2. Limits
38 3-3. Protections
39 3-4. Allocations
40 4. Interface Files
41 4-1. Format
42 4-2. Conventions
43 4-3. Core Interface Files
44 5. Controllers
45 5-1. CPU
46 5-1-1. CPU Interface Files
47 5-2. Memory
48 5-2-1. Memory Interface Files
49 5-2-2. Usage Guidelines
50 5-2-3. Memory Ownership
51 5-3. IO
52 5-3-1. IO Interface Files
53 5-3-2. Writeback
54 5-4. PID
55 5-4-1. PID Interface Files
Roman Gushchin4ad5a322017-12-13 19:49:03 +000056 5-5. Device
57 5-6. RDMA
58 5-6-1. RDMA Interface Files
59 5-7. Misc
60 5-7-1. perf_event
Maciej S. Szmigieroc4e08422018-01-10 23:33:19 +010061 5-N. Non-normative information
62 5-N-1. CPU controller root cgroup process behaviour
63 5-N-2. IO controller root cgroup process behaviour
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -030064 6. Namespace
65 6-1. Basics
66 6-2. The Root and Views
67 6-3. Migration and setns(2)
68 6-4. Interaction with Other Namespaces
69 P. Information on Kernel Programming
70 P-1. Filesystem Support for Writeback
71 D. Deprecated v1 Core Features
72 R. Issues with v1 and Rationales for v2
73 R-1. Multiple Hierarchies
74 R-2. Thread Granularity
75 R-3. Competition Between Inner Nodes and Threads
76 R-4. Other Interface Issues
77 R-5. Controller Issues and Remedies
78 R-5-1. Memory
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -050079
80
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -030081Introduction
82============
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -050083
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -030084Terminology
85-----------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -050086
87"cgroup" stands for "control group" and is never capitalized. The
88singular form is used to designate the whole feature and also as a
89qualifier as in "cgroup controllers". When explicitly referring to
90multiple individual control groups, the plural form "cgroups" is used.
91
92
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -030093What is cgroup?
94---------------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -050095
96cgroup is a mechanism to organize processes hierarchically and
97distribute system resources along the hierarchy in a controlled and
98configurable manner.
99
100cgroup is largely composed of two parts - the core and controllers.
101cgroup core is primarily responsible for hierarchically organizing
102processes. A cgroup controller is usually responsible for
103distributing a specific type of system resource along the hierarchy
104although there are utility controllers which serve purposes other than
105resource distribution.
106
107cgroups form a tree structure and every process in the system belongs
108to one and only one cgroup. All threads of a process belong to the
109same cgroup. On creation, all processes are put in the cgroup that
110the parent process belongs to at the time. A process can be migrated
111to another cgroup. Migration of a process doesn't affect already
112existing descendant processes.
113
114Following certain structural constraints, controllers may be enabled or
115disabled selectively on a cgroup. All controller behaviors are
116hierarchical - if a controller is enabled on a cgroup, it affects all
117processes which belong to the cgroups consisting the inclusive
118sub-hierarchy of the cgroup. When a controller is enabled on a nested
119cgroup, it always restricts the resource distribution further. The
120restrictions set closer to the root in the hierarchy can not be
121overridden from further away.
122
123
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300124Basic Operations
125================
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500126
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300127Mounting
128--------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500129
130Unlike v1, cgroup v2 has only single hierarchy. The cgroup v2
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300131hierarchy can be mounted with the following mount command::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500132
133 # mount -t cgroup2 none $MOUNT_POINT
134
135cgroup2 filesystem has the magic number 0x63677270 ("cgrp"). All
136controllers which support v2 and are not bound to a v1 hierarchy are
137automatically bound to the v2 hierarchy and show up at the root.
138Controllers which are not in active use in the v2 hierarchy can be
139bound to other hierarchies. This allows mixing v2 hierarchy with the
140legacy v1 multiple hierarchies in a fully backward compatible way.
141
142A controller can be moved across hierarchies only after the controller
143is no longer referenced in its current hierarchy. Because per-cgroup
144controller states are destroyed asynchronously and controllers may
145have lingering references, a controller may not show up immediately on
146the v2 hierarchy after the final umount of the previous hierarchy.
147Similarly, a controller should be fully disabled to be moved out of
148the unified hierarchy and it may take some time for the disabled
149controller to become available for other hierarchies; furthermore, due
150to inter-controller dependencies, other controllers may need to be
151disabled too.
152
153While useful for development and manual configurations, moving
154controllers dynamically between the v2 and other hierarchies is
155strongly discouraged for production use. It is recommended to decide
156the hierarchies and controller associations before starting using the
157controllers after system boot.
158
Johannes Weiner1619b6d2016-02-16 13:21:14 -0500159During transition to v2, system management software might still
160automount the v1 cgroup filesystem and so hijack all controllers
161during boot, before manual intervention is possible. To make testing
162and experimenting easier, the kernel parameter cgroup_no_v1= allows
163disabling controllers in v1 and make them always available in v2.
164
Tejun Heo5136f632017-06-27 14:30:28 -0400165cgroup v2 currently supports the following mount options.
166
167 nsdelegate
168
169 Consider cgroup namespaces as delegation boundaries. This
170 option is system wide and can only be set on mount or modified
171 through remount from the init namespace. The mount option is
172 ignored on non-init namespace mounts. Please refer to the
173 Delegation section for details.
174
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500175
Tejun Heo8cfd8142017-07-21 11:14:51 -0400176Organizing Processes and Threads
177--------------------------------
178
179Processes
180~~~~~~~~~
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500181
182Initially, only the root cgroup exists to which all processes belong.
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300183A child cgroup can be created by creating a sub-directory::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500184
185 # mkdir $CGROUP_NAME
186
187A given cgroup may have multiple child cgroups forming a tree
188structure. Each cgroup has a read-writable interface file
189"cgroup.procs". When read, it lists the PIDs of all processes which
190belong to the cgroup one-per-line. The PIDs are not ordered and the
191same PID may show up more than once if the process got moved to
192another cgroup and then back or the PID got recycled while reading.
193
194A process can be migrated into a cgroup by writing its PID to the
195target cgroup's "cgroup.procs" file. Only one process can be migrated
196on a single write(2) call. If a process is composed of multiple
197threads, writing the PID of any thread migrates all threads of the
198process.
199
200When a process forks a child process, the new process is born into the
201cgroup that the forking process belongs to at the time of the
202operation. After exit, a process stays associated with the cgroup
203that it belonged to at the time of exit until it's reaped; however, a
204zombie process does not appear in "cgroup.procs" and thus can't be
205moved to another cgroup.
206
207A cgroup which doesn't have any children or live processes can be
208destroyed by removing the directory. Note that a cgroup which doesn't
209have any children and is associated only with zombie processes is
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300210considered empty and can be removed::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500211
212 # rmdir $CGROUP_NAME
213
214"/proc/$PID/cgroup" lists a process's cgroup membership. If legacy
215cgroup is in use in the system, this file may contain multiple lines,
216one for each hierarchy. The entry for cgroup v2 is always in the
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300217format "0::$PATH"::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500218
219 # cat /proc/842/cgroup
220 ...
221 0::/test-cgroup/test-cgroup-nested
222
223If the process becomes a zombie and the cgroup it was associated with
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300224is removed subsequently, " (deleted)" is appended to the path::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500225
226 # cat /proc/842/cgroup
227 ...
228 0::/test-cgroup/test-cgroup-nested (deleted)
229
230
Tejun Heo8cfd8142017-07-21 11:14:51 -0400231Threads
232~~~~~~~
233
234cgroup v2 supports thread granularity for a subset of controllers to
235support use cases requiring hierarchical resource distribution across
236the threads of a group of processes. By default, all threads of a
237process belong to the same cgroup, which also serves as the resource
238domain to host resource consumptions which are not specific to a
239process or thread. The thread mode allows threads to be spread across
240a subtree while still maintaining the common resource domain for them.
241
242Controllers which support thread mode are called threaded controllers.
243The ones which don't are called domain controllers.
244
245Marking a cgroup threaded makes it join the resource domain of its
246parent as a threaded cgroup. The parent may be another threaded
247cgroup whose resource domain is further up in the hierarchy. The root
248of a threaded subtree, that is, the nearest ancestor which is not
249threaded, is called threaded domain or thread root interchangeably and
250serves as the resource domain for the entire subtree.
251
252Inside a threaded subtree, threads of a process can be put in
253different cgroups and are not subject to the no internal process
254constraint - threaded controllers can be enabled on non-leaf cgroups
255whether they have threads in them or not.
256
257As the threaded domain cgroup hosts all the domain resource
258consumptions of the subtree, it is considered to have internal
259resource consumptions whether there are processes in it or not and
260can't have populated child cgroups which aren't threaded. Because the
261root cgroup is not subject to no internal process constraint, it can
262serve both as a threaded domain and a parent to domain cgroups.
263
264The current operation mode or type of the cgroup is shown in the
265"cgroup.type" file which indicates whether the cgroup is a normal
266domain, a domain which is serving as the domain of a threaded subtree,
267or a threaded cgroup.
268
269On creation, a cgroup is always a domain cgroup and can be made
270threaded by writing "threaded" to the "cgroup.type" file. The
271operation is single direction::
272
273 # echo threaded > cgroup.type
274
275Once threaded, the cgroup can't be made a domain again. To enable the
276thread mode, the following conditions must be met.
277
278- As the cgroup will join the parent's resource domain. The parent
279 must either be a valid (threaded) domain or a threaded cgroup.
280
Tejun Heo918a8c22017-07-23 08:18:26 -0400281- When the parent is an unthreaded domain, it must not have any domain
282 controllers enabled or populated domain children. The root is
283 exempt from this requirement.
Tejun Heo8cfd8142017-07-21 11:14:51 -0400284
285Topology-wise, a cgroup can be in an invalid state. Please consider
Vladimir Rutsky2877cbe2018-01-02 17:27:41 +0100286the following topology::
Tejun Heo8cfd8142017-07-21 11:14:51 -0400287
288 A (threaded domain) - B (threaded) - C (domain, just created)
289
290C is created as a domain but isn't connected to a parent which can
291host child domains. C can't be used until it is turned into a
292threaded cgroup. "cgroup.type" file will report "domain (invalid)" in
293these cases. Operations which fail due to invalid topology use
294EOPNOTSUPP as the errno.
295
296A domain cgroup is turned into a threaded domain when one of its child
297cgroup becomes threaded or threaded controllers are enabled in the
298"cgroup.subtree_control" file while there are processes in the cgroup.
299A threaded domain reverts to a normal domain when the conditions
300clear.
301
302When read, "cgroup.threads" contains the list of the thread IDs of all
303threads in the cgroup. Except that the operations are per-thread
304instead of per-process, "cgroup.threads" has the same format and
305behaves the same way as "cgroup.procs". While "cgroup.threads" can be
306written to in any cgroup, as it can only move threads inside the same
307threaded domain, its operations are confined inside each threaded
308subtree.
309
310The threaded domain cgroup serves as the resource domain for the whole
311subtree, and, while the threads can be scattered across the subtree,
312all the processes are considered to be in the threaded domain cgroup.
313"cgroup.procs" in a threaded domain cgroup contains the PIDs of all
314processes in the subtree and is not readable in the subtree proper.
315However, "cgroup.procs" can be written to from anywhere in the subtree
316to migrate all threads of the matching process to the cgroup.
317
318Only threaded controllers can be enabled in a threaded subtree. When
319a threaded controller is enabled inside a threaded subtree, it only
320accounts for and controls resource consumptions associated with the
321threads in the cgroup and its descendants. All consumptions which
322aren't tied to a specific thread belong to the threaded domain cgroup.
323
324Because a threaded subtree is exempt from no internal process
325constraint, a threaded controller must be able to handle competition
326between threads in a non-leaf cgroup and its child cgroups. Each
327threaded controller defines how such competitions are handled.
328
329
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300330[Un]populated Notification
331--------------------------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500332
333Each non-root cgroup has a "cgroup.events" file which contains
334"populated" field indicating whether the cgroup's sub-hierarchy has
335live processes in it. Its value is 0 if there is no live process in
336the cgroup and its descendants; otherwise, 1. poll and [id]notify
337events are triggered when the value changes. This can be used, for
338example, to start a clean-up operation after all processes of a given
339sub-hierarchy have exited. The populated state updates and
340notifications are recursive. Consider the following sub-hierarchy
341where the numbers in the parentheses represent the numbers of processes
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300342in each cgroup::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500343
344 A(4) - B(0) - C(1)
345 \ D(0)
346
347A, B and C's "populated" fields would be 1 while D's 0. After the one
348process in C exits, B and C's "populated" fields would flip to "0" and
349file modified events will be generated on the "cgroup.events" files of
350both cgroups.
351
352
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300353Controlling Controllers
354-----------------------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500355
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300356Enabling and Disabling
357~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500358
359Each cgroup has a "cgroup.controllers" file which lists all
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300360controllers available for the cgroup to enable::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500361
362 # cat cgroup.controllers
363 cpu io memory
364
365No controller is enabled by default. Controllers can be enabled and
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300366disabled by writing to the "cgroup.subtree_control" file::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500367
368 # echo "+cpu +memory -io" > cgroup.subtree_control
369
370Only controllers which are listed in "cgroup.controllers" can be
371enabled. When multiple operations are specified as above, either they
372all succeed or fail. If multiple operations on the same controller
373are specified, the last one is effective.
374
375Enabling a controller in a cgroup indicates that the distribution of
376the target resource across its immediate children will be controlled.
377Consider the following sub-hierarchy. The enabled controllers are
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300378listed in parentheses::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500379
380 A(cpu,memory) - B(memory) - C()
381 \ D()
382
383As A has "cpu" and "memory" enabled, A will control the distribution
384of CPU cycles and memory to its children, in this case, B. As B has
385"memory" enabled but not "CPU", C and D will compete freely on CPU
386cycles but their division of memory available to B will be controlled.
387
388As a controller regulates the distribution of the target resource to
389the cgroup's children, enabling it creates the controller's interface
390files in the child cgroups. In the above example, enabling "cpu" on B
391would create the "cpu." prefixed controller interface files in C and
392D. Likewise, disabling "memory" from B would remove the "memory."
393prefixed controller interface files from C and D. This means that the
394controller interface files - anything which doesn't start with
395"cgroup." are owned by the parent rather than the cgroup itself.
396
397
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300398Top-down Constraint
399~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500400
401Resources are distributed top-down and a cgroup can further distribute
402a resource only if the resource has been distributed to it from the
403parent. This means that all non-root "cgroup.subtree_control" files
404can only contain controllers which are enabled in the parent's
405"cgroup.subtree_control" file. A controller can be enabled only if
406the parent has the controller enabled and a controller can't be
407disabled if one or more children have it enabled.
408
409
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300410No Internal Process Constraint
411~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500412
Tejun Heo8cfd8142017-07-21 11:14:51 -0400413Non-root cgroups can distribute domain resources to their children
414only when they don't have any processes of their own. In other words,
415only domain cgroups which don't contain any processes can have domain
416controllers enabled in their "cgroup.subtree_control" files.
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500417
Tejun Heo8cfd8142017-07-21 11:14:51 -0400418This guarantees that, when a domain controller is looking at the part
419of the hierarchy which has it enabled, processes are always only on
420the leaves. This rules out situations where child cgroups compete
421against internal processes of the parent.
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500422
423The root cgroup is exempt from this restriction. Root contains
424processes and anonymous resource consumption which can't be associated
425with any other cgroups and requires special treatment from most
426controllers. How resource consumption in the root cgroup is governed
Maciej S. Szmigieroc4e08422018-01-10 23:33:19 +0100427is up to each controller (for more information on this topic please
428refer to the Non-normative information section in the Controllers
429chapter).
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500430
431Note that the restriction doesn't get in the way if there is no
432enabled controller in the cgroup's "cgroup.subtree_control". This is
433important as otherwise it wouldn't be possible to create children of a
434populated cgroup. To control resource distribution of a cgroup, the
435cgroup must create children and transfer all its processes to the
436children before enabling controllers in its "cgroup.subtree_control"
437file.
438
439
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300440Delegation
441----------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500442
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300443Model of Delegation
444~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500445
Tejun Heo5136f632017-06-27 14:30:28 -0400446A cgroup can be delegated in two ways. First, to a less privileged
Tejun Heo8cfd8142017-07-21 11:14:51 -0400447user by granting write access of the directory and its "cgroup.procs",
448"cgroup.threads" and "cgroup.subtree_control" files to the user.
449Second, if the "nsdelegate" mount option is set, automatically to a
450cgroup namespace on namespace creation.
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500451
Tejun Heo5136f632017-06-27 14:30:28 -0400452Because the resource control interface files in a given directory
453control the distribution of the parent's resources, the delegatee
454shouldn't be allowed to write to them. For the first method, this is
455achieved by not granting access to these files. For the second, the
456kernel rejects writes to all files other than "cgroup.procs" and
457"cgroup.subtree_control" on a namespace root from inside the
458namespace.
459
460The end results are equivalent for both delegation types. Once
461delegated, the user can build sub-hierarchy under the directory,
462organize processes inside it as it sees fit and further distribute the
463resources it received from the parent. The limits and other settings
464of all resource controllers are hierarchical and regardless of what
465happens in the delegated sub-hierarchy, nothing can escape the
466resource restrictions imposed by the parent.
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500467
468Currently, cgroup doesn't impose any restrictions on the number of
469cgroups in or nesting depth of a delegated sub-hierarchy; however,
470this may be limited explicitly in the future.
471
472
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300473Delegation Containment
474~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500475
476A delegated sub-hierarchy is contained in the sense that processes
Tejun Heo5136f632017-06-27 14:30:28 -0400477can't be moved into or out of the sub-hierarchy by the delegatee.
478
479For delegations to a less privileged user, this is achieved by
480requiring the following conditions for a process with a non-root euid
481to migrate a target process into a cgroup by writing its PID to the
482"cgroup.procs" file.
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500483
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500484- The writer must have write access to the "cgroup.procs" file.
485
486- The writer must have write access to the "cgroup.procs" file of the
487 common ancestor of the source and destination cgroups.
488
Tejun Heo576dd462017-01-20 11:29:54 -0500489The above two constraints ensure that while a delegatee may migrate
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500490processes around freely in the delegated sub-hierarchy it can't pull
491in from or push out to outside the sub-hierarchy.
492
493For an example, let's assume cgroups C0 and C1 have been delegated to
494user U0 who created C00, C01 under C0 and C10 under C1 as follows and
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300495all processes under C0 and C1 belong to U0::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500496
497 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ - C0 - C00
498 ~ cgroup ~ \ C01
499 ~ hierarchy ~
500 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ - C1 - C10
501
502Let's also say U0 wants to write the PID of a process which is
503currently in C10 into "C00/cgroup.procs". U0 has write access to the
Tejun Heo576dd462017-01-20 11:29:54 -0500504file; however, the common ancestor of the source cgroup C10 and the
505destination cgroup C00 is above the points of delegation and U0 would
506not have write access to its "cgroup.procs" files and thus the write
507will be denied with -EACCES.
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500508
Tejun Heo5136f632017-06-27 14:30:28 -0400509For delegations to namespaces, containment is achieved by requiring
510that both the source and destination cgroups are reachable from the
511namespace of the process which is attempting the migration. If either
512is not reachable, the migration is rejected with -ENOENT.
513
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500514
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300515Guidelines
516----------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500517
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300518Organize Once and Control
519~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500520
521Migrating a process across cgroups is a relatively expensive operation
522and stateful resources such as memory are not moved together with the
523process. This is an explicit design decision as there often exist
524inherent trade-offs between migration and various hot paths in terms
525of synchronization cost.
526
527As such, migrating processes across cgroups frequently as a means to
528apply different resource restrictions is discouraged. A workload
529should be assigned to a cgroup according to the system's logical and
530resource structure once on start-up. Dynamic adjustments to resource
531distribution can be made by changing controller configuration through
532the interface files.
533
534
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300535Avoid Name Collisions
536~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500537
538Interface files for a cgroup and its children cgroups occupy the same
539directory and it is possible to create children cgroups which collide
540with interface files.
541
542All cgroup core interface files are prefixed with "cgroup." and each
543controller's interface files are prefixed with the controller name and
544a dot. A controller's name is composed of lower case alphabets and
545'_'s but never begins with an '_' so it can be used as the prefix
546character for collision avoidance. Also, interface file names won't
547start or end with terms which are often used in categorizing workloads
548such as job, service, slice, unit or workload.
549
550cgroup doesn't do anything to prevent name collisions and it's the
551user's responsibility to avoid them.
552
553
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300554Resource Distribution Models
555============================
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500556
557cgroup controllers implement several resource distribution schemes
558depending on the resource type and expected use cases. This section
559describes major schemes in use along with their expected behaviors.
560
561
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300562Weights
563-------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500564
565A parent's resource is distributed by adding up the weights of all
566active children and giving each the fraction matching the ratio of its
567weight against the sum. As only children which can make use of the
568resource at the moment participate in the distribution, this is
569work-conserving. Due to the dynamic nature, this model is usually
570used for stateless resources.
571
572All weights are in the range [1, 10000] with the default at 100. This
573allows symmetric multiplicative biases in both directions at fine
574enough granularity while staying in the intuitive range.
575
576As long as the weight is in range, all configuration combinations are
577valid and there is no reason to reject configuration changes or
578process migrations.
579
580"cpu.weight" proportionally distributes CPU cycles to active children
581and is an example of this type.
582
583
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300584Limits
585------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500586
587A child can only consume upto the configured amount of the resource.
588Limits can be over-committed - the sum of the limits of children can
589exceed the amount of resource available to the parent.
590
591Limits are in the range [0, max] and defaults to "max", which is noop.
592
593As limits can be over-committed, all configuration combinations are
594valid and there is no reason to reject configuration changes or
595process migrations.
596
597"io.max" limits the maximum BPS and/or IOPS that a cgroup can consume
598on an IO device and is an example of this type.
599
600
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300601Protections
602-----------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500603
604A cgroup is protected to be allocated upto the configured amount of
605the resource if the usages of all its ancestors are under their
606protected levels. Protections can be hard guarantees or best effort
607soft boundaries. Protections can also be over-committed in which case
608only upto the amount available to the parent is protected among
609children.
610
611Protections are in the range [0, max] and defaults to 0, which is
612noop.
613
614As protections can be over-committed, all configuration combinations
615are valid and there is no reason to reject configuration changes or
616process migrations.
617
618"memory.low" implements best-effort memory protection and is an
619example of this type.
620
621
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300622Allocations
623-----------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500624
625A cgroup is exclusively allocated a certain amount of a finite
626resource. Allocations can't be over-committed - the sum of the
627allocations of children can not exceed the amount of resource
628available to the parent.
629
630Allocations are in the range [0, max] and defaults to 0, which is no
631resource.
632
633As allocations can't be over-committed, some configuration
634combinations are invalid and should be rejected. Also, if the
635resource is mandatory for execution of processes, process migrations
636may be rejected.
637
638"cpu.rt.max" hard-allocates realtime slices and is an example of this
639type.
640
641
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300642Interface Files
643===============
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500644
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300645Format
646------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500647
648All interface files should be in one of the following formats whenever
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300649possible::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500650
651 New-line separated values
652 (when only one value can be written at once)
653
654 VAL0\n
655 VAL1\n
656 ...
657
658 Space separated values
659 (when read-only or multiple values can be written at once)
660
661 VAL0 VAL1 ...\n
662
663 Flat keyed
664
665 KEY0 VAL0\n
666 KEY1 VAL1\n
667 ...
668
669 Nested keyed
670
671 KEY0 SUB_KEY0=VAL00 SUB_KEY1=VAL01...
672 KEY1 SUB_KEY0=VAL10 SUB_KEY1=VAL11...
673 ...
674
675For a writable file, the format for writing should generally match
676reading; however, controllers may allow omitting later fields or
677implement restricted shortcuts for most common use cases.
678
679For both flat and nested keyed files, only the values for a single key
680can be written at a time. For nested keyed files, the sub key pairs
681may be specified in any order and not all pairs have to be specified.
682
683
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300684Conventions
685-----------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500686
687- Settings for a single feature should be contained in a single file.
688
689- The root cgroup should be exempt from resource control and thus
690 shouldn't have resource control interface files. Also,
691 informational files on the root cgroup which end up showing global
692 information available elsewhere shouldn't exist.
693
694- If a controller implements weight based resource distribution, its
695 interface file should be named "weight" and have the range [1,
696 10000] with 100 as the default. The values are chosen to allow
697 enough and symmetric bias in both directions while keeping it
698 intuitive (the default is 100%).
699
700- If a controller implements an absolute resource guarantee and/or
701 limit, the interface files should be named "min" and "max"
702 respectively. If a controller implements best effort resource
703 guarantee and/or limit, the interface files should be named "low"
704 and "high" respectively.
705
706 In the above four control files, the special token "max" should be
707 used to represent upward infinity for both reading and writing.
708
709- If a setting has a configurable default value and keyed specific
710 overrides, the default entry should be keyed with "default" and
711 appear as the first entry in the file.
712
713 The default value can be updated by writing either "default $VAL" or
714 "$VAL".
715
716 When writing to update a specific override, "default" can be used as
717 the value to indicate removal of the override. Override entries
718 with "default" as the value must not appear when read.
719
720 For example, a setting which is keyed by major:minor device numbers
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300721 with integer values may look like the following::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500722
723 # cat cgroup-example-interface-file
724 default 150
725 8:0 300
726
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300727 The default value can be updated by::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500728
729 # echo 125 > cgroup-example-interface-file
730
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300731 or::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500732
733 # echo "default 125" > cgroup-example-interface-file
734
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300735 An override can be set by::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500736
737 # echo "8:16 170" > cgroup-example-interface-file
738
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300739 and cleared by::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500740
741 # echo "8:0 default" > cgroup-example-interface-file
742 # cat cgroup-example-interface-file
743 default 125
744 8:16 170
745
746- For events which are not very high frequency, an interface file
747 "events" should be created which lists event key value pairs.
748 Whenever a notifiable event happens, file modified event should be
749 generated on the file.
750
751
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300752Core Interface Files
753--------------------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500754
755All cgroup core files are prefixed with "cgroup."
756
Tejun Heo8cfd8142017-07-21 11:14:51 -0400757 cgroup.type
758
759 A read-write single value file which exists on non-root
760 cgroups.
761
762 When read, it indicates the current type of the cgroup, which
763 can be one of the following values.
764
765 - "domain" : A normal valid domain cgroup.
766
767 - "domain threaded" : A threaded domain cgroup which is
768 serving as the root of a threaded subtree.
769
770 - "domain invalid" : A cgroup which is in an invalid state.
771 It can't be populated or have controllers enabled. It may
772 be allowed to become a threaded cgroup.
773
774 - "threaded" : A threaded cgroup which is a member of a
775 threaded subtree.
776
777 A cgroup can be turned into a threaded cgroup by writing
778 "threaded" to this file.
779
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500780 cgroup.procs
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500781 A read-write new-line separated values file which exists on
782 all cgroups.
783
784 When read, it lists the PIDs of all processes which belong to
785 the cgroup one-per-line. The PIDs are not ordered and the
786 same PID may show up more than once if the process got moved
787 to another cgroup and then back or the PID got recycled while
788 reading.
789
790 A PID can be written to migrate the process associated with
791 the PID to the cgroup. The writer should match all of the
792 following conditions.
793
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500794 - It must have write access to the "cgroup.procs" file.
795
796 - It must have write access to the "cgroup.procs" file of the
797 common ancestor of the source and destination cgroups.
798
799 When delegating a sub-hierarchy, write access to this file
800 should be granted along with the containing directory.
801
Tejun Heo8cfd8142017-07-21 11:14:51 -0400802 In a threaded cgroup, reading this file fails with EOPNOTSUPP
803 as all the processes belong to the thread root. Writing is
804 supported and moves every thread of the process to the cgroup.
805
806 cgroup.threads
807 A read-write new-line separated values file which exists on
808 all cgroups.
809
810 When read, it lists the TIDs of all threads which belong to
811 the cgroup one-per-line. The TIDs are not ordered and the
812 same TID may show up more than once if the thread got moved to
813 another cgroup and then back or the TID got recycled while
814 reading.
815
816 A TID can be written to migrate the thread associated with the
817 TID to the cgroup. The writer should match all of the
818 following conditions.
819
820 - It must have write access to the "cgroup.threads" file.
821
822 - The cgroup that the thread is currently in must be in the
823 same resource domain as the destination cgroup.
824
825 - It must have write access to the "cgroup.procs" file of the
826 common ancestor of the source and destination cgroups.
827
828 When delegating a sub-hierarchy, write access to this file
829 should be granted along with the containing directory.
830
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500831 cgroup.controllers
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500832 A read-only space separated values file which exists on all
833 cgroups.
834
835 It shows space separated list of all controllers available to
836 the cgroup. The controllers are not ordered.
837
838 cgroup.subtree_control
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500839 A read-write space separated values file which exists on all
840 cgroups. Starts out empty.
841
842 When read, it shows space separated list of the controllers
843 which are enabled to control resource distribution from the
844 cgroup to its children.
845
846 Space separated list of controllers prefixed with '+' or '-'
847 can be written to enable or disable controllers. A controller
848 name prefixed with '+' enables the controller and '-'
849 disables. If a controller appears more than once on the list,
850 the last one is effective. When multiple enable and disable
851 operations are specified, either all succeed or all fail.
852
853 cgroup.events
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500854 A read-only flat-keyed file which exists on non-root cgroups.
855 The following entries are defined. Unless specified
856 otherwise, a value change in this file generates a file
857 modified event.
858
859 populated
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500860 1 if the cgroup or its descendants contains any live
861 processes; otherwise, 0.
862
Roman Gushchin1a926e02017-07-28 18:28:44 +0100863 cgroup.max.descendants
864 A read-write single value files. The default is "max".
865
866 Maximum allowed number of descent cgroups.
867 If the actual number of descendants is equal or larger,
868 an attempt to create a new cgroup in the hierarchy will fail.
869
870 cgroup.max.depth
871 A read-write single value files. The default is "max".
872
873 Maximum allowed descent depth below the current cgroup.
874 If the actual descent depth is equal or larger,
875 an attempt to create a new child cgroup will fail.
876
Roman Gushchinec392252017-08-02 17:55:31 +0100877 cgroup.stat
878 A read-only flat-keyed file with the following entries:
879
880 nr_descendants
881 Total number of visible descendant cgroups.
882
883 nr_dying_descendants
884 Total number of dying descendant cgroups. A cgroup becomes
885 dying after being deleted by a user. The cgroup will remain
886 in dying state for some time undefined time (which can depend
887 on system load) before being completely destroyed.
888
889 A process can't enter a dying cgroup under any circumstances,
890 a dying cgroup can't revive.
891
892 A dying cgroup can consume system resources not exceeding
893 limits, which were active at the moment of cgroup deletion.
894
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500895
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300896Controllers
897===========
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500898
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300899CPU
900---
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500901
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500902The "cpu" controllers regulates distribution of CPU cycles. This
903controller implements weight and absolute bandwidth limit models for
904normal scheduling policy and absolute bandwidth allocation model for
905realtime scheduling policy.
906
Tejun Heoc2f31b72017-12-05 09:10:17 -0800907WARNING: cgroup2 doesn't yet support control of realtime processes and
908the cpu controller can only be enabled when all RT processes are in
909the root cgroup. Be aware that system management software may already
910have placed RT processes into nonroot cgroups during the system boot
911process, and these processes may need to be moved to the root cgroup
912before the cpu controller can be enabled.
913
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500914
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300915CPU Interface Files
916~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500917
918All time durations are in microseconds.
919
920 cpu.stat
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500921 A read-only flat-keyed file which exists on non-root cgroups.
Tejun Heod41bf8c2017-10-23 16:18:27 -0700922 This file exists whether the controller is enabled or not.
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500923
Tejun Heod41bf8c2017-10-23 16:18:27 -0700924 It always reports the following three stats:
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500925
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300926 - usage_usec
927 - user_usec
928 - system_usec
Tejun Heod41bf8c2017-10-23 16:18:27 -0700929
930 and the following three when the controller is enabled:
931
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300932 - nr_periods
933 - nr_throttled
934 - throttled_usec
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500935
936 cpu.weight
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500937 A read-write single value file which exists on non-root
938 cgroups. The default is "100".
939
940 The weight in the range [1, 10000].
941
Tejun Heo0d593632017-09-25 09:00:19 -0700942 cpu.weight.nice
943 A read-write single value file which exists on non-root
944 cgroups. The default is "0".
945
946 The nice value is in the range [-20, 19].
947
948 This interface file is an alternative interface for
949 "cpu.weight" and allows reading and setting weight using the
950 same values used by nice(2). Because the range is smaller and
951 granularity is coarser for the nice values, the read value is
952 the closest approximation of the current weight.
953
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500954 cpu.max
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500955 A read-write two value file which exists on non-root cgroups.
956 The default is "max 100000".
957
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300958 The maximum bandwidth limit. It's in the following format::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500959
960 $MAX $PERIOD
961
962 which indicates that the group may consume upto $MAX in each
963 $PERIOD duration. "max" for $MAX indicates no limit. If only
964 one number is written, $MAX is updated.
965
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500966
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300967Memory
968------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500969
970The "memory" controller regulates distribution of memory. Memory is
971stateful and implements both limit and protection models. Due to the
972intertwining between memory usage and reclaim pressure and the
973stateful nature of memory, the distribution model is relatively
974complex.
975
976While not completely water-tight, all major memory usages by a given
977cgroup are tracked so that the total memory consumption can be
978accounted and controlled to a reasonable extent. Currently, the
979following types of memory usages are tracked.
980
981- Userland memory - page cache and anonymous memory.
982
983- Kernel data structures such as dentries and inodes.
984
985- TCP socket buffers.
986
987The above list may expand in the future for better coverage.
988
989
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300990Memory Interface Files
991~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500992
993All memory amounts are in bytes. If a value which is not aligned to
994PAGE_SIZE is written, the value may be rounded up to the closest
995PAGE_SIZE multiple when read back.
996
997 memory.current
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500998 A read-only single value file which exists on non-root
999 cgroups.
1000
1001 The total amount of memory currently being used by the cgroup
1002 and its descendants.
1003
Roman Gushchinbf8d5d52018-06-07 17:07:46 -07001004 memory.min
1005 A read-write single value file which exists on non-root
1006 cgroups. The default is "0".
1007
1008 Hard memory protection. If the memory usage of a cgroup
1009 is within its effective min boundary, the cgroup's memory
1010 won't be reclaimed under any conditions. If there is no
1011 unprotected reclaimable memory available, OOM killer
1012 is invoked.
1013
1014 Effective min boundary is limited by memory.min values of
1015 all ancestor cgroups. If there is memory.min overcommitment
1016 (child cgroup or cgroups are requiring more protected memory
1017 than parent will allow), then each child cgroup will get
1018 the part of parent's protection proportional to its
1019 actual memory usage below memory.min.
1020
1021 Putting more memory than generally available under this
1022 protection is discouraged and may lead to constant OOMs.
1023
1024 If a memory cgroup is not populated with processes,
1025 its memory.min is ignored.
1026
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001027 memory.low
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001028 A read-write single value file which exists on non-root
1029 cgroups. The default is "0".
1030
Roman Gushchin78542072018-06-07 17:06:29 -07001031 Best-effort memory protection. If the memory usage of a
1032 cgroup is within its effective low boundary, the cgroup's
1033 memory won't be reclaimed unless memory can be reclaimed
1034 from unprotected cgroups.
1035
1036 Effective low boundary is limited by memory.low values of
1037 all ancestor cgroups. If there is memory.low overcommitment
Roman Gushchinbf8d5d52018-06-07 17:07:46 -07001038 (child cgroup or cgroups are requiring more protected memory
Roman Gushchin78542072018-06-07 17:06:29 -07001039 than parent will allow), then each child cgroup will get
Roman Gushchinbf8d5d52018-06-07 17:07:46 -07001040 the part of parent's protection proportional to its
Roman Gushchin78542072018-06-07 17:06:29 -07001041 actual memory usage below memory.low.
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001042
1043 Putting more memory than generally available under this
1044 protection is discouraged.
1045
1046 memory.high
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001047 A read-write single value file which exists on non-root
1048 cgroups. The default is "max".
1049
1050 Memory usage throttle limit. This is the main mechanism to
1051 control memory usage of a cgroup. If a cgroup's usage goes
1052 over the high boundary, the processes of the cgroup are
1053 throttled and put under heavy reclaim pressure.
1054
1055 Going over the high limit never invokes the OOM killer and
1056 under extreme conditions the limit may be breached.
1057
1058 memory.max
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001059 A read-write single value file which exists on non-root
1060 cgroups. The default is "max".
1061
1062 Memory usage hard limit. This is the final protection
1063 mechanism. If a cgroup's memory usage reaches this limit and
1064 can't be reduced, the OOM killer is invoked in the cgroup.
1065 Under certain circumstances, the usage may go over the limit
1066 temporarily.
1067
1068 This is the ultimate protection mechanism. As long as the
1069 high limit is used and monitored properly, this limit's
1070 utility is limited to providing the final safety net.
1071
1072 memory.events
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001073 A read-only flat-keyed file which exists on non-root cgroups.
1074 The following entries are defined. Unless specified
1075 otherwise, a value change in this file generates a file
1076 modified event.
1077
1078 low
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001079 The number of times the cgroup is reclaimed due to
1080 high memory pressure even though its usage is under
1081 the low boundary. This usually indicates that the low
1082 boundary is over-committed.
1083
1084 high
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001085 The number of times processes of the cgroup are
1086 throttled and routed to perform direct memory reclaim
1087 because the high memory boundary was exceeded. For a
1088 cgroup whose memory usage is capped by the high limit
1089 rather than global memory pressure, this event's
1090 occurrences are expected.
1091
1092 max
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001093 The number of times the cgroup's memory usage was
1094 about to go over the max boundary. If direct reclaim
Konstantin Khlebnikov8e675f72017-07-06 15:40:28 -07001095 fails to bring it down, the cgroup goes to OOM state.
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001096
1097 oom
Konstantin Khlebnikov8e675f72017-07-06 15:40:28 -07001098 The number of time the cgroup's memory usage was
1099 reached the limit and allocation was about to fail.
1100
1101 Depending on context result could be invocation of OOM
Vladimir Rutsky2877cbe2018-01-02 17:27:41 +01001102 killer and retrying allocation or failing allocation.
Konstantin Khlebnikov8e675f72017-07-06 15:40:28 -07001103
1104 Failed allocation in its turn could be returned into
Vladimir Rutsky2877cbe2018-01-02 17:27:41 +01001105 userspace as -ENOMEM or silently ignored in cases like
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001106 disk readahead. For now OOM in memory cgroup kills
Konstantin Khlebnikov8e675f72017-07-06 15:40:28 -07001107 tasks iff shortage has happened inside page fault.
1108
1109 oom_kill
Konstantin Khlebnikov8e675f72017-07-06 15:40:28 -07001110 The number of processes belonging to this cgroup
1111 killed by any kind of OOM killer.
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001112
Johannes Weiner587d9f72016-01-20 15:03:19 -08001113 memory.stat
Johannes Weiner587d9f72016-01-20 15:03:19 -08001114 A read-only flat-keyed file which exists on non-root cgroups.
1115
1116 This breaks down the cgroup's memory footprint into different
1117 types of memory, type-specific details, and other information
1118 on the state and past events of the memory management system.
1119
1120 All memory amounts are in bytes.
1121
1122 The entries are ordered to be human readable, and new entries
1123 can show up in the middle. Don't rely on items remaining in a
1124 fixed position; use the keys to look up specific values!
1125
1126 anon
Johannes Weiner587d9f72016-01-20 15:03:19 -08001127 Amount of memory used in anonymous mappings such as
1128 brk(), sbrk(), and mmap(MAP_ANONYMOUS)
1129
1130 file
Johannes Weiner587d9f72016-01-20 15:03:19 -08001131 Amount of memory used to cache filesystem data,
1132 including tmpfs and shared memory.
1133
Vladimir Davydov12580e42016-03-17 14:17:38 -07001134 kernel_stack
Vladimir Davydov12580e42016-03-17 14:17:38 -07001135 Amount of memory allocated to kernel stacks.
1136
Vladimir Davydov27ee57c2016-03-17 14:17:35 -07001137 slab
Vladimir Davydov27ee57c2016-03-17 14:17:35 -07001138 Amount of memory used for storing in-kernel data
1139 structures.
1140
Johannes Weiner4758e192016-02-02 16:57:41 -08001141 sock
Johannes Weiner4758e192016-02-02 16:57:41 -08001142 Amount of memory used in network transmission buffers
1143
Johannes Weiner9a4caf12017-05-03 14:52:45 -07001144 shmem
Johannes Weiner9a4caf12017-05-03 14:52:45 -07001145 Amount of cached filesystem data that is swap-backed,
1146 such as tmpfs, shm segments, shared anonymous mmap()s
1147
Johannes Weiner587d9f72016-01-20 15:03:19 -08001148 file_mapped
Johannes Weiner587d9f72016-01-20 15:03:19 -08001149 Amount of cached filesystem data mapped with mmap()
1150
1151 file_dirty
Johannes Weiner587d9f72016-01-20 15:03:19 -08001152 Amount of cached filesystem data that was modified but
1153 not yet written back to disk
1154
1155 file_writeback
Johannes Weiner587d9f72016-01-20 15:03:19 -08001156 Amount of cached filesystem data that was modified and
1157 is currently being written back to disk
1158
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001159 inactive_anon, active_anon, inactive_file, active_file, unevictable
Johannes Weiner587d9f72016-01-20 15:03:19 -08001160 Amount of memory, swap-backed and filesystem-backed,
1161 on the internal memory management lists used by the
1162 page reclaim algorithm
1163
Vladimir Davydov27ee57c2016-03-17 14:17:35 -07001164 slab_reclaimable
Vladimir Davydov27ee57c2016-03-17 14:17:35 -07001165 Part of "slab" that might be reclaimed, such as
1166 dentries and inodes.
1167
1168 slab_unreclaimable
Vladimir Davydov27ee57c2016-03-17 14:17:35 -07001169 Part of "slab" that cannot be reclaimed on memory
1170 pressure.
1171
Johannes Weiner587d9f72016-01-20 15:03:19 -08001172 pgfault
Johannes Weiner587d9f72016-01-20 15:03:19 -08001173 Total number of page faults incurred
1174
1175 pgmajfault
Johannes Weiner587d9f72016-01-20 15:03:19 -08001176 Number of major page faults incurred
1177
Roman Gushchinb3409592017-05-12 15:47:09 -07001178 workingset_refault
1179
1180 Number of refaults of previously evicted pages
1181
1182 workingset_activate
1183
1184 Number of refaulted pages that were immediately activated
1185
1186 workingset_nodereclaim
1187
1188 Number of times a shadow node has been reclaimed
1189
Roman Gushchin22621852017-07-06 15:40:25 -07001190 pgrefill
1191
1192 Amount of scanned pages (in an active LRU list)
1193
1194 pgscan
1195
1196 Amount of scanned pages (in an inactive LRU list)
1197
1198 pgsteal
1199
1200 Amount of reclaimed pages
1201
1202 pgactivate
1203
1204 Amount of pages moved to the active LRU list
1205
1206 pgdeactivate
1207
1208 Amount of pages moved to the inactive LRU lis
1209
1210 pglazyfree
1211
1212 Amount of pages postponed to be freed under memory pressure
1213
1214 pglazyfreed
1215
1216 Amount of reclaimed lazyfree pages
1217
Vladimir Davydov3e24b192016-01-20 15:03:13 -08001218 memory.swap.current
Vladimir Davydov3e24b192016-01-20 15:03:13 -08001219 A read-only single value file which exists on non-root
1220 cgroups.
1221
1222 The total amount of swap currently being used by the cgroup
1223 and its descendants.
1224
1225 memory.swap.max
Vladimir Davydov3e24b192016-01-20 15:03:13 -08001226 A read-write single value file which exists on non-root
1227 cgroups. The default is "max".
1228
1229 Swap usage hard limit. If a cgroup's swap usage reaches this
Vladimir Rutsky2877cbe2018-01-02 17:27:41 +01001230 limit, anonymous memory of the cgroup will not be swapped out.
Vladimir Davydov3e24b192016-01-20 15:03:13 -08001231
Tejun Heof3a53a32018-06-07 17:05:35 -07001232 memory.swap.events
1233 A read-only flat-keyed file which exists on non-root cgroups.
1234 The following entries are defined. Unless specified
1235 otherwise, a value change in this file generates a file
1236 modified event.
1237
1238 max
1239 The number of times the cgroup's swap usage was about
1240 to go over the max boundary and swap allocation
1241 failed.
1242
1243 fail
1244 The number of times swap allocation failed either
1245 because of running out of swap system-wide or max
1246 limit.
1247
Tejun Heobe091022018-06-07 17:09:21 -07001248 When reduced under the current usage, the existing swap
1249 entries are reclaimed gradually and the swap usage may stay
1250 higher than the limit for an extended period of time. This
1251 reduces the impact on the workload and memory management.
1252
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001253
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001254Usage Guidelines
1255~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001256
1257"memory.high" is the main mechanism to control memory usage.
1258Over-committing on high limit (sum of high limits > available memory)
1259and letting global memory pressure to distribute memory according to
1260usage is a viable strategy.
1261
1262Because breach of the high limit doesn't trigger the OOM killer but
1263throttles the offending cgroup, a management agent has ample
1264opportunities to monitor and take appropriate actions such as granting
1265more memory or terminating the workload.
1266
1267Determining whether a cgroup has enough memory is not trivial as
1268memory usage doesn't indicate whether the workload can benefit from
1269more memory. For example, a workload which writes data received from
1270network to a file can use all available memory but can also operate as
1271performant with a small amount of memory. A measure of memory
1272pressure - how much the workload is being impacted due to lack of
1273memory - is necessary to determine whether a workload needs more
1274memory; unfortunately, memory pressure monitoring mechanism isn't
1275implemented yet.
1276
1277
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001278Memory Ownership
1279~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001280
1281A memory area is charged to the cgroup which instantiated it and stays
1282charged to the cgroup until the area is released. Migrating a process
1283to a different cgroup doesn't move the memory usages that it
1284instantiated while in the previous cgroup to the new cgroup.
1285
1286A memory area may be used by processes belonging to different cgroups.
1287To which cgroup the area will be charged is in-deterministic; however,
1288over time, the memory area is likely to end up in a cgroup which has
1289enough memory allowance to avoid high reclaim pressure.
1290
1291If a cgroup sweeps a considerable amount of memory which is expected
1292to be accessed repeatedly by other cgroups, it may make sense to use
1293POSIX_FADV_DONTNEED to relinquish the ownership of memory areas
1294belonging to the affected files to ensure correct memory ownership.
1295
1296
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001297IO
1298--
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001299
1300The "io" controller regulates the distribution of IO resources. This
1301controller implements both weight based and absolute bandwidth or IOPS
1302limit distribution; however, weight based distribution is available
1303only if cfq-iosched is in use and neither scheme is available for
1304blk-mq devices.
1305
1306
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001307IO Interface Files
1308~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001309
1310 io.stat
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001311 A read-only nested-keyed file which exists on non-root
1312 cgroups.
1313
1314 Lines are keyed by $MAJ:$MIN device numbers and not ordered.
1315 The following nested keys are defined.
1316
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001317 ====== ===================
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001318 rbytes Bytes read
1319 wbytes Bytes written
1320 rios Number of read IOs
1321 wios Number of write IOs
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001322 ====== ===================
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001323
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001324 An example read output follows:
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001325
1326 8:16 rbytes=1459200 wbytes=314773504 rios=192 wios=353
1327 8:0 rbytes=90430464 wbytes=299008000 rios=8950 wios=1252
1328
1329 io.weight
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001330 A read-write flat-keyed file which exists on non-root cgroups.
1331 The default is "default 100".
1332
1333 The first line is the default weight applied to devices
1334 without specific override. The rest are overrides keyed by
1335 $MAJ:$MIN device numbers and not ordered. The weights are in
1336 the range [1, 10000] and specifies the relative amount IO time
1337 the cgroup can use in relation to its siblings.
1338
1339 The default weight can be updated by writing either "default
1340 $WEIGHT" or simply "$WEIGHT". Overrides can be set by writing
1341 "$MAJ:$MIN $WEIGHT" and unset by writing "$MAJ:$MIN default".
1342
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001343 An example read output follows::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001344
1345 default 100
1346 8:16 200
1347 8:0 50
1348
1349 io.max
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001350 A read-write nested-keyed file which exists on non-root
1351 cgroups.
1352
1353 BPS and IOPS based IO limit. Lines are keyed by $MAJ:$MIN
1354 device numbers and not ordered. The following nested keys are
1355 defined.
1356
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001357 ===== ==================================
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001358 rbps Max read bytes per second
1359 wbps Max write bytes per second
1360 riops Max read IO operations per second
1361 wiops Max write IO operations per second
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001362 ===== ==================================
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001363
1364 When writing, any number of nested key-value pairs can be
1365 specified in any order. "max" can be specified as the value
1366 to remove a specific limit. If the same key is specified
1367 multiple times, the outcome is undefined.
1368
1369 BPS and IOPS are measured in each IO direction and IOs are
1370 delayed if limit is reached. Temporary bursts are allowed.
1371
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001372 Setting read limit at 2M BPS and write at 120 IOPS for 8:16::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001373
1374 echo "8:16 rbps=2097152 wiops=120" > io.max
1375
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001376 Reading returns the following::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001377
1378 8:16 rbps=2097152 wbps=max riops=max wiops=120
1379
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001380 Write IOPS limit can be removed by writing the following::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001381
1382 echo "8:16 wiops=max" > io.max
1383
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001384 Reading now returns the following::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001385
1386 8:16 rbps=2097152 wbps=max riops=max wiops=max
1387
1388
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001389Writeback
1390~~~~~~~~~
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001391
1392Page cache is dirtied through buffered writes and shared mmaps and
1393written asynchronously to the backing filesystem by the writeback
1394mechanism. Writeback sits between the memory and IO domains and
1395regulates the proportion of dirty memory by balancing dirtying and
1396write IOs.
1397
1398The io controller, in conjunction with the memory controller,
1399implements control of page cache writeback IOs. The memory controller
1400defines the memory domain that dirty memory ratio is calculated and
1401maintained for and the io controller defines the io domain which
1402writes out dirty pages for the memory domain. Both system-wide and
1403per-cgroup dirty memory states are examined and the more restrictive
1404of the two is enforced.
1405
1406cgroup writeback requires explicit support from the underlying
1407filesystem. Currently, cgroup writeback is implemented on ext2, ext4
1408and btrfs. On other filesystems, all writeback IOs are attributed to
1409the root cgroup.
1410
1411There are inherent differences in memory and writeback management
1412which affects how cgroup ownership is tracked. Memory is tracked per
1413page while writeback per inode. For the purpose of writeback, an
1414inode is assigned to a cgroup and all IO requests to write dirty pages
1415from the inode are attributed to that cgroup.
1416
1417As cgroup ownership for memory is tracked per page, there can be pages
1418which are associated with different cgroups than the one the inode is
1419associated with. These are called foreign pages. The writeback
1420constantly keeps track of foreign pages and, if a particular foreign
1421cgroup becomes the majority over a certain period of time, switches
1422the ownership of the inode to that cgroup.
1423
1424While this model is enough for most use cases where a given inode is
1425mostly dirtied by a single cgroup even when the main writing cgroup
1426changes over time, use cases where multiple cgroups write to a single
1427inode simultaneously are not supported well. In such circumstances, a
1428significant portion of IOs are likely to be attributed incorrectly.
1429As memory controller assigns page ownership on the first use and
1430doesn't update it until the page is released, even if writeback
1431strictly follows page ownership, multiple cgroups dirtying overlapping
1432areas wouldn't work as expected. It's recommended to avoid such usage
1433patterns.
1434
1435The sysctl knobs which affect writeback behavior are applied to cgroup
1436writeback as follows.
1437
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001438 vm.dirty_background_ratio, vm.dirty_ratio
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001439 These ratios apply the same to cgroup writeback with the
1440 amount of available memory capped by limits imposed by the
1441 memory controller and system-wide clean memory.
1442
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001443 vm.dirty_background_bytes, vm.dirty_bytes
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001444 For cgroup writeback, this is calculated into ratio against
1445 total available memory and applied the same way as
1446 vm.dirty[_background]_ratio.
1447
1448
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001449PID
1450---
Hans Ragas20c56e52017-01-10 17:42:34 +00001451
1452The process number controller is used to allow a cgroup to stop any
1453new tasks from being fork()'d or clone()'d after a specified limit is
1454reached.
1455
1456The number of tasks in a cgroup can be exhausted in ways which other
1457controllers cannot prevent, thus warranting its own controller. For
1458example, a fork bomb is likely to exhaust the number of tasks before
1459hitting memory restrictions.
1460
1461Note that PIDs used in this controller refer to TIDs, process IDs as
1462used by the kernel.
1463
1464
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001465PID Interface Files
1466~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Hans Ragas20c56e52017-01-10 17:42:34 +00001467
1468 pids.max
Tobias Klauser312eb712017-02-17 18:44:11 +01001469 A read-write single value file which exists on non-root
1470 cgroups. The default is "max".
Hans Ragas20c56e52017-01-10 17:42:34 +00001471
Tobias Klauser312eb712017-02-17 18:44:11 +01001472 Hard limit of number of processes.
Hans Ragas20c56e52017-01-10 17:42:34 +00001473
1474 pids.current
Tobias Klauser312eb712017-02-17 18:44:11 +01001475 A read-only single value file which exists on all cgroups.
Hans Ragas20c56e52017-01-10 17:42:34 +00001476
Tobias Klauser312eb712017-02-17 18:44:11 +01001477 The number of processes currently in the cgroup and its
1478 descendants.
Hans Ragas20c56e52017-01-10 17:42:34 +00001479
1480Organisational operations are not blocked by cgroup policies, so it is
1481possible to have pids.current > pids.max. This can be done by either
1482setting the limit to be smaller than pids.current, or attaching enough
1483processes to the cgroup such that pids.current is larger than
1484pids.max. However, it is not possible to violate a cgroup PID policy
1485through fork() or clone(). These will return -EAGAIN if the creation
1486of a new process would cause a cgroup policy to be violated.
1487
1488
Roman Gushchin4ad5a322017-12-13 19:49:03 +00001489Device controller
1490-----------------
1491
1492Device controller manages access to device files. It includes both
1493creation of new device files (using mknod), and access to the
1494existing device files.
1495
1496Cgroup v2 device controller has no interface files and is implemented
1497on top of cgroup BPF. To control access to device files, a user may
1498create bpf programs of the BPF_CGROUP_DEVICE type and attach them
1499to cgroups. On an attempt to access a device file, corresponding
1500BPF programs will be executed, and depending on the return value
1501the attempt will succeed or fail with -EPERM.
1502
1503A BPF_CGROUP_DEVICE program takes a pointer to the bpf_cgroup_dev_ctx
1504structure, which describes the device access attempt: access type
1505(mknod/read/write) and device (type, major and minor numbers).
1506If the program returns 0, the attempt fails with -EPERM, otherwise
1507it succeeds.
1508
1509An example of BPF_CGROUP_DEVICE program may be found in the kernel
1510source tree in the tools/testing/selftests/bpf/dev_cgroup.c file.
1511
1512
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001513RDMA
1514----
Tejun Heo968ebff2017-01-29 14:35:20 -05001515
Parav Pandit9c1e67f2017-01-10 00:02:15 +00001516The "rdma" controller regulates the distribution and accounting of
1517of RDMA resources.
1518
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001519RDMA Interface Files
1520~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Parav Pandit9c1e67f2017-01-10 00:02:15 +00001521
1522 rdma.max
1523 A readwrite nested-keyed file that exists for all the cgroups
1524 except root that describes current configured resource limit
1525 for a RDMA/IB device.
1526
1527 Lines are keyed by device name and are not ordered.
1528 Each line contains space separated resource name and its configured
1529 limit that can be distributed.
1530
1531 The following nested keys are defined.
1532
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001533 ========== =============================
Parav Pandit9c1e67f2017-01-10 00:02:15 +00001534 hca_handle Maximum number of HCA Handles
1535 hca_object Maximum number of HCA Objects
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001536 ========== =============================
Parav Pandit9c1e67f2017-01-10 00:02:15 +00001537
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001538 An example for mlx4 and ocrdma device follows::
Parav Pandit9c1e67f2017-01-10 00:02:15 +00001539
1540 mlx4_0 hca_handle=2 hca_object=2000
1541 ocrdma1 hca_handle=3 hca_object=max
1542
1543 rdma.current
1544 A read-only file that describes current resource usage.
1545 It exists for all the cgroup except root.
1546
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001547 An example for mlx4 and ocrdma device follows::
Parav Pandit9c1e67f2017-01-10 00:02:15 +00001548
1549 mlx4_0 hca_handle=1 hca_object=20
1550 ocrdma1 hca_handle=1 hca_object=23
1551
1552
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001553Misc
1554----
Tejun Heo63f1ca52017-02-02 13:50:35 -05001555
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001556perf_event
1557~~~~~~~~~~
Tejun Heo968ebff2017-01-29 14:35:20 -05001558
1559perf_event controller, if not mounted on a legacy hierarchy, is
1560automatically enabled on the v2 hierarchy so that perf events can
1561always be filtered by cgroup v2 path. The controller can still be
1562moved to a legacy hierarchy after v2 hierarchy is populated.
1563
1564
Maciej S. Szmigieroc4e08422018-01-10 23:33:19 +01001565Non-normative information
1566-------------------------
1567
1568This section contains information that isn't considered to be a part of
1569the stable kernel API and so is subject to change.
1570
1571
1572CPU controller root cgroup process behaviour
1573~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1574
1575When distributing CPU cycles in the root cgroup each thread in this
1576cgroup is treated as if it was hosted in a separate child cgroup of the
1577root cgroup. This child cgroup weight is dependent on its thread nice
1578level.
1579
1580For details of this mapping see sched_prio_to_weight array in
1581kernel/sched/core.c file (values from this array should be scaled
1582appropriately so the neutral - nice 0 - value is 100 instead of 1024).
1583
1584
1585IO controller root cgroup process behaviour
1586~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1587
1588Root cgroup processes are hosted in an implicit leaf child node.
1589When distributing IO resources this implicit child node is taken into
1590account as if it was a normal child cgroup of the root cgroup with a
1591weight value of 200.
1592
1593
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001594Namespace
1595=========
Serge Hallynd4021f62016-01-29 02:54:10 -06001596
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001597Basics
1598------
Serge Hallynd4021f62016-01-29 02:54:10 -06001599
1600cgroup namespace provides a mechanism to virtualize the view of the
1601"/proc/$PID/cgroup" file and cgroup mounts. The CLONE_NEWCGROUP clone
1602flag can be used with clone(2) and unshare(2) to create a new cgroup
1603namespace. The process running inside the cgroup namespace will have
1604its "/proc/$PID/cgroup" output restricted to cgroupns root. The
1605cgroupns root is the cgroup of the process at the time of creation of
1606the cgroup namespace.
1607
1608Without cgroup namespace, the "/proc/$PID/cgroup" file shows the
1609complete path of the cgroup of a process. In a container setup where
1610a set of cgroups and namespaces are intended to isolate processes the
1611"/proc/$PID/cgroup" file may leak potential system level information
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001612to the isolated processes. For Example::
Serge Hallynd4021f62016-01-29 02:54:10 -06001613
1614 # cat /proc/self/cgroup
1615 0::/batchjobs/container_id1
1616
1617The path '/batchjobs/container_id1' can be considered as system-data
1618and undesirable to expose to the isolated processes. cgroup namespace
1619can be used to restrict visibility of this path. For example, before
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001620creating a cgroup namespace, one would see::
Serge Hallynd4021f62016-01-29 02:54:10 -06001621
1622 # ls -l /proc/self/ns/cgroup
1623 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 2014-07-15 10:37 /proc/self/ns/cgroup -> cgroup:[4026531835]
1624 # cat /proc/self/cgroup
1625 0::/batchjobs/container_id1
1626
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001627After unsharing a new namespace, the view changes::
Serge Hallynd4021f62016-01-29 02:54:10 -06001628
1629 # ls -l /proc/self/ns/cgroup
1630 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 2014-07-15 10:35 /proc/self/ns/cgroup -> cgroup:[4026532183]
1631 # cat /proc/self/cgroup
1632 0::/
1633
1634When some thread from a multi-threaded process unshares its cgroup
1635namespace, the new cgroupns gets applied to the entire process (all
1636the threads). This is natural for the v2 hierarchy; however, for the
1637legacy hierarchies, this may be unexpected.
1638
1639A cgroup namespace is alive as long as there are processes inside or
1640mounts pinning it. When the last usage goes away, the cgroup
1641namespace is destroyed. The cgroupns root and the actual cgroups
1642remain.
1643
1644
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001645The Root and Views
1646------------------
Serge Hallynd4021f62016-01-29 02:54:10 -06001647
1648The 'cgroupns root' for a cgroup namespace is the cgroup in which the
1649process calling unshare(2) is running. For example, if a process in
1650/batchjobs/container_id1 cgroup calls unshare, cgroup
1651/batchjobs/container_id1 becomes the cgroupns root. For the
1652init_cgroup_ns, this is the real root ('/') cgroup.
1653
1654The cgroupns root cgroup does not change even if the namespace creator
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001655process later moves to a different cgroup::
Serge Hallynd4021f62016-01-29 02:54:10 -06001656
1657 # ~/unshare -c # unshare cgroupns in some cgroup
1658 # cat /proc/self/cgroup
1659 0::/
1660 # mkdir sub_cgrp_1
1661 # echo 0 > sub_cgrp_1/cgroup.procs
1662 # cat /proc/self/cgroup
1663 0::/sub_cgrp_1
1664
1665Each process gets its namespace-specific view of "/proc/$PID/cgroup"
1666
1667Processes running inside the cgroup namespace will be able to see
1668cgroup paths (in /proc/self/cgroup) only inside their root cgroup.
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001669From within an unshared cgroupns::
Serge Hallynd4021f62016-01-29 02:54:10 -06001670
1671 # sleep 100000 &
1672 [1] 7353
1673 # echo 7353 > sub_cgrp_1/cgroup.procs
1674 # cat /proc/7353/cgroup
1675 0::/sub_cgrp_1
1676
1677From the initial cgroup namespace, the real cgroup path will be
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001678visible::
Serge Hallynd4021f62016-01-29 02:54:10 -06001679
1680 $ cat /proc/7353/cgroup
1681 0::/batchjobs/container_id1/sub_cgrp_1
1682
1683From a sibling cgroup namespace (that is, a namespace rooted at a
1684different cgroup), the cgroup path relative to its own cgroup
1685namespace root will be shown. For instance, if PID 7353's cgroup
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001686namespace root is at '/batchjobs/container_id2', then it will see::
Serge Hallynd4021f62016-01-29 02:54:10 -06001687
1688 # cat /proc/7353/cgroup
1689 0::/../container_id2/sub_cgrp_1
1690
1691Note that the relative path always starts with '/' to indicate that
1692its relative to the cgroup namespace root of the caller.
1693
1694
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001695Migration and setns(2)
1696----------------------
Serge Hallynd4021f62016-01-29 02:54:10 -06001697
1698Processes inside a cgroup namespace can move into and out of the
1699namespace root if they have proper access to external cgroups. For
1700example, from inside a namespace with cgroupns root at
1701/batchjobs/container_id1, and assuming that the global hierarchy is
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001702still accessible inside cgroupns::
Serge Hallynd4021f62016-01-29 02:54:10 -06001703
1704 # cat /proc/7353/cgroup
1705 0::/sub_cgrp_1
1706 # echo 7353 > batchjobs/container_id2/cgroup.procs
1707 # cat /proc/7353/cgroup
1708 0::/../container_id2
1709
1710Note that this kind of setup is not encouraged. A task inside cgroup
1711namespace should only be exposed to its own cgroupns hierarchy.
1712
1713setns(2) to another cgroup namespace is allowed when:
1714
1715(a) the process has CAP_SYS_ADMIN against its current user namespace
1716(b) the process has CAP_SYS_ADMIN against the target cgroup
1717 namespace's userns
1718
1719No implicit cgroup changes happen with attaching to another cgroup
1720namespace. It is expected that the someone moves the attaching
1721process under the target cgroup namespace root.
1722
1723
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001724Interaction with Other Namespaces
1725---------------------------------
Serge Hallynd4021f62016-01-29 02:54:10 -06001726
1727Namespace specific cgroup hierarchy can be mounted by a process
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001728running inside a non-init cgroup namespace::
Serge Hallynd4021f62016-01-29 02:54:10 -06001729
1730 # mount -t cgroup2 none $MOUNT_POINT
1731
1732This will mount the unified cgroup hierarchy with cgroupns root as the
1733filesystem root. The process needs CAP_SYS_ADMIN against its user and
1734mount namespaces.
1735
1736The virtualization of /proc/self/cgroup file combined with restricting
1737the view of cgroup hierarchy by namespace-private cgroupfs mount
1738provides a properly isolated cgroup view inside the container.
1739
1740
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001741Information on Kernel Programming
1742=================================
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001743
1744This section contains kernel programming information in the areas
1745where interacting with cgroup is necessary. cgroup core and
1746controllers are not covered.
1747
1748
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001749Filesystem Support for Writeback
1750--------------------------------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001751
1752A filesystem can support cgroup writeback by updating
1753address_space_operations->writepage[s]() to annotate bio's using the
1754following two functions.
1755
1756 wbc_init_bio(@wbc, @bio)
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001757 Should be called for each bio carrying writeback data and
1758 associates the bio with the inode's owner cgroup. Can be
1759 called anytime between bio allocation and submission.
1760
1761 wbc_account_io(@wbc, @page, @bytes)
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001762 Should be called for each data segment being written out.
1763 While this function doesn't care exactly when it's called
1764 during the writeback session, it's the easiest and most
1765 natural to call it as data segments are added to a bio.
1766
1767With writeback bio's annotated, cgroup support can be enabled per
1768super_block by setting SB_I_CGROUPWB in ->s_iflags. This allows for
1769selective disabling of cgroup writeback support which is helpful when
1770certain filesystem features, e.g. journaled data mode, are
1771incompatible.
1772
1773wbc_init_bio() binds the specified bio to its cgroup. Depending on
1774the configuration, the bio may be executed at a lower priority and if
1775the writeback session is holding shared resources, e.g. a journal
1776entry, may lead to priority inversion. There is no one easy solution
1777for the problem. Filesystems can try to work around specific problem
1778cases by skipping wbc_init_bio() or using bio_associate_blkcg()
1779directly.
1780
1781
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001782Deprecated v1 Core Features
1783===========================
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001784
1785- Multiple hierarchies including named ones are not supported.
1786
Tejun Heo5136f632017-06-27 14:30:28 -04001787- All v1 mount options are not supported.
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001788
1789- The "tasks" file is removed and "cgroup.procs" is not sorted.
1790
1791- "cgroup.clone_children" is removed.
1792
1793- /proc/cgroups is meaningless for v2. Use "cgroup.controllers" file
1794 at the root instead.
1795
1796
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001797Issues with v1 and Rationales for v2
1798====================================
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001799
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001800Multiple Hierarchies
1801--------------------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001802
1803cgroup v1 allowed an arbitrary number of hierarchies and each
1804hierarchy could host any number of controllers. While this seemed to
1805provide a high level of flexibility, it wasn't useful in practice.
1806
1807For example, as there is only one instance of each controller, utility
1808type controllers such as freezer which can be useful in all
1809hierarchies could only be used in one. The issue is exacerbated by
1810the fact that controllers couldn't be moved to another hierarchy once
1811hierarchies were populated. Another issue was that all controllers
1812bound to a hierarchy were forced to have exactly the same view of the
1813hierarchy. It wasn't possible to vary the granularity depending on
1814the specific controller.
1815
1816In practice, these issues heavily limited which controllers could be
1817put on the same hierarchy and most configurations resorted to putting
1818each controller on its own hierarchy. Only closely related ones, such
1819as the cpu and cpuacct controllers, made sense to be put on the same
1820hierarchy. This often meant that userland ended up managing multiple
1821similar hierarchies repeating the same steps on each hierarchy
1822whenever a hierarchy management operation was necessary.
1823
1824Furthermore, support for multiple hierarchies came at a steep cost.
1825It greatly complicated cgroup core implementation but more importantly
1826the support for multiple hierarchies restricted how cgroup could be
1827used in general and what controllers was able to do.
1828
1829There was no limit on how many hierarchies there might be, which meant
1830that a thread's cgroup membership couldn't be described in finite
1831length. The key might contain any number of entries and was unlimited
1832in length, which made it highly awkward to manipulate and led to
1833addition of controllers which existed only to identify membership,
1834which in turn exacerbated the original problem of proliferating number
1835of hierarchies.
1836
1837Also, as a controller couldn't have any expectation regarding the
1838topologies of hierarchies other controllers might be on, each
1839controller had to assume that all other controllers were attached to
1840completely orthogonal hierarchies. This made it impossible, or at
1841least very cumbersome, for controllers to cooperate with each other.
1842
1843In most use cases, putting controllers on hierarchies which are
1844completely orthogonal to each other isn't necessary. What usually is
1845called for is the ability to have differing levels of granularity
1846depending on the specific controller. In other words, hierarchy may
1847be collapsed from leaf towards root when viewed from specific
1848controllers. For example, a given configuration might not care about
1849how memory is distributed beyond a certain level while still wanting
1850to control how CPU cycles are distributed.
1851
1852
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001853Thread Granularity
1854------------------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001855
1856cgroup v1 allowed threads of a process to belong to different cgroups.
1857This didn't make sense for some controllers and those controllers
1858ended up implementing different ways to ignore such situations but
1859much more importantly it blurred the line between API exposed to
1860individual applications and system management interface.
1861
1862Generally, in-process knowledge is available only to the process
1863itself; thus, unlike service-level organization of processes,
1864categorizing threads of a process requires active participation from
1865the application which owns the target process.
1866
1867cgroup v1 had an ambiguously defined delegation model which got abused
1868in combination with thread granularity. cgroups were delegated to
1869individual applications so that they can create and manage their own
1870sub-hierarchies and control resource distributions along them. This
1871effectively raised cgroup to the status of a syscall-like API exposed
1872to lay programs.
1873
1874First of all, cgroup has a fundamentally inadequate interface to be
1875exposed this way. For a process to access its own knobs, it has to
1876extract the path on the target hierarchy from /proc/self/cgroup,
1877construct the path by appending the name of the knob to the path, open
1878and then read and/or write to it. This is not only extremely clunky
1879and unusual but also inherently racy. There is no conventional way to
1880define transaction across the required steps and nothing can guarantee
1881that the process would actually be operating on its own sub-hierarchy.
1882
1883cgroup controllers implemented a number of knobs which would never be
1884accepted as public APIs because they were just adding control knobs to
1885system-management pseudo filesystem. cgroup ended up with interface
1886knobs which were not properly abstracted or refined and directly
1887revealed kernel internal details. These knobs got exposed to
1888individual applications through the ill-defined delegation mechanism
1889effectively abusing cgroup as a shortcut to implementing public APIs
1890without going through the required scrutiny.
1891
1892This was painful for both userland and kernel. Userland ended up with
1893misbehaving and poorly abstracted interfaces and kernel exposing and
1894locked into constructs inadvertently.
1895
1896
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001897Competition Between Inner Nodes and Threads
1898-------------------------------------------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001899
1900cgroup v1 allowed threads to be in any cgroups which created an
1901interesting problem where threads belonging to a parent cgroup and its
1902children cgroups competed for resources. This was nasty as two
1903different types of entities competed and there was no obvious way to
1904settle it. Different controllers did different things.
1905
1906The cpu controller considered threads and cgroups as equivalents and
1907mapped nice levels to cgroup weights. This worked for some cases but
1908fell flat when children wanted to be allocated specific ratios of CPU
1909cycles and the number of internal threads fluctuated - the ratios
1910constantly changed as the number of competing entities fluctuated.
1911There also were other issues. The mapping from nice level to weight
1912wasn't obvious or universal, and there were various other knobs which
1913simply weren't available for threads.
1914
1915The io controller implicitly created a hidden leaf node for each
1916cgroup to host the threads. The hidden leaf had its own copies of all
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001917the knobs with ``leaf_`` prefixed. While this allowed equivalent
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001918control over internal threads, it was with serious drawbacks. It
1919always added an extra layer of nesting which wouldn't be necessary
1920otherwise, made the interface messy and significantly complicated the
1921implementation.
1922
1923The memory controller didn't have a way to control what happened
1924between internal tasks and child cgroups and the behavior was not
1925clearly defined. There were attempts to add ad-hoc behaviors and
1926knobs to tailor the behavior to specific workloads which would have
1927led to problems extremely difficult to resolve in the long term.
1928
1929Multiple controllers struggled with internal tasks and came up with
1930different ways to deal with it; unfortunately, all the approaches were
1931severely flawed and, furthermore, the widely different behaviors
1932made cgroup as a whole highly inconsistent.
1933
1934This clearly is a problem which needs to be addressed from cgroup core
1935in a uniform way.
1936
1937
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001938Other Interface Issues
1939----------------------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001940
1941cgroup v1 grew without oversight and developed a large number of
1942idiosyncrasies and inconsistencies. One issue on the cgroup core side
1943was how an empty cgroup was notified - a userland helper binary was
1944forked and executed for each event. The event delivery wasn't
1945recursive or delegatable. The limitations of the mechanism also led
1946to in-kernel event delivery filtering mechanism further complicating
1947the interface.
1948
1949Controller interfaces were problematic too. An extreme example is
1950controllers completely ignoring hierarchical organization and treating
1951all cgroups as if they were all located directly under the root
1952cgroup. Some controllers exposed a large amount of inconsistent
1953implementation details to userland.
1954
1955There also was no consistency across controllers. When a new cgroup
1956was created, some controllers defaulted to not imposing extra
1957restrictions while others disallowed any resource usage until
1958explicitly configured. Configuration knobs for the same type of
1959control used widely differing naming schemes and formats. Statistics
1960and information knobs were named arbitrarily and used different
1961formats and units even in the same controller.
1962
1963cgroup v2 establishes common conventions where appropriate and updates
1964controllers so that they expose minimal and consistent interfaces.
1965
1966
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001967Controller Issues and Remedies
1968------------------------------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001969
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001970Memory
1971~~~~~~
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001972
1973The original lower boundary, the soft limit, is defined as a limit
1974that is per default unset. As a result, the set of cgroups that
1975global reclaim prefers is opt-in, rather than opt-out. The costs for
1976optimizing these mostly negative lookups are so high that the
1977implementation, despite its enormous size, does not even provide the
1978basic desirable behavior. First off, the soft limit has no
1979hierarchical meaning. All configured groups are organized in a global
1980rbtree and treated like equal peers, regardless where they are located
1981in the hierarchy. This makes subtree delegation impossible. Second,
1982the soft limit reclaim pass is so aggressive that it not just
1983introduces high allocation latencies into the system, but also impacts
1984system performance due to overreclaim, to the point where the feature
1985becomes self-defeating.
1986
1987The memory.low boundary on the other hand is a top-down allocated
Roman Gushchin78542072018-06-07 17:06:29 -07001988reserve. A cgroup enjoys reclaim protection when it's within its low,
1989which makes delegation of subtrees possible.
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001990
1991The original high boundary, the hard limit, is defined as a strict
1992limit that can not budge, even if the OOM killer has to be called.
1993But this generally goes against the goal of making the most out of the
1994available memory. The memory consumption of workloads varies during
1995runtime, and that requires users to overcommit. But doing that with a
1996strict upper limit requires either a fairly accurate prediction of the
1997working set size or adding slack to the limit. Since working set size
1998estimation is hard and error prone, and getting it wrong results in
1999OOM kills, most users tend to err on the side of a looser limit and
2000end up wasting precious resources.
2001
2002The memory.high boundary on the other hand can be set much more
2003conservatively. When hit, it throttles allocations by forcing them
2004into direct reclaim to work off the excess, but it never invokes the
2005OOM killer. As a result, a high boundary that is chosen too
2006aggressively will not terminate the processes, but instead it will
2007lead to gradual performance degradation. The user can monitor this
2008and make corrections until the minimal memory footprint that still
2009gives acceptable performance is found.
2010
2011In extreme cases, with many concurrent allocations and a complete
2012breakdown of reclaim progress within the group, the high boundary can
2013be exceeded. But even then it's mostly better to satisfy the
2014allocation from the slack available in other groups or the rest of the
2015system than killing the group. Otherwise, memory.max is there to
2016limit this type of spillover and ultimately contain buggy or even
2017malicious applications.
Vladimir Davydov3e24b192016-01-20 15:03:13 -08002018
Johannes Weinerb6e6edc2016-03-17 14:20:28 -07002019Setting the original memory.limit_in_bytes below the current usage was
2020subject to a race condition, where concurrent charges could cause the
2021limit setting to fail. memory.max on the other hand will first set the
2022limit to prevent new charges, and then reclaim and OOM kill until the
2023new limit is met - or the task writing to memory.max is killed.
2024
Vladimir Davydov3e24b192016-01-20 15:03:13 -08002025The combined memory+swap accounting and limiting is replaced by real
2026control over swap space.
2027
2028The main argument for a combined memory+swap facility in the original
2029cgroup design was that global or parental pressure would always be
2030able to swap all anonymous memory of a child group, regardless of the
2031child's own (possibly untrusted) configuration. However, untrusted
2032groups can sabotage swapping by other means - such as referencing its
2033anonymous memory in a tight loop - and an admin can not assume full
2034swappability when overcommitting untrusted jobs.
2035
2036For trusted jobs, on the other hand, a combined counter is not an
2037intuitive userspace interface, and it flies in the face of the idea
2038that cgroup controllers should account and limit specific physical
2039resources. Swap space is a resource like all others in the system,
2040and that's why unified hierarchy allows distributing it separately.