blob: 74cdeaed9f7afb4f0b514f1213b38b2eda106f56 [file] [log] [blame]
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001================
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05002Control Group v2
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03003================
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05004
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03005:Date: October, 2015
6:Author: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05007
8This is the authoritative documentation on the design, interface and
9conventions of cgroup v2. It describes all userland-visible aspects
10of cgroup including core and specific controller behaviors. All
11future changes must be reflected in this document. Documentation for
W. Trevor King9a2ddda2016-01-27 13:01:52 -080012v1 is available under Documentation/cgroup-v1/.
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -050013
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -030014.. CONTENTS
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -050015
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -030016 1. Introduction
17 1-1. Terminology
18 1-2. What is cgroup?
19 2. Basic Operations
20 2-1. Mounting
Tejun Heo8cfd8142017-07-21 11:14:51 -040021 2-2. Organizing Processes and Threads
22 2-2-1. Processes
23 2-2-2. Threads
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -030024 2-3. [Un]populated Notification
25 2-4. Controlling Controllers
26 2-4-1. Enabling and Disabling
27 2-4-2. Top-down Constraint
28 2-4-3. No Internal Process Constraint
29 2-5. Delegation
30 2-5-1. Model of Delegation
31 2-5-2. Delegation Containment
32 2-6. Guidelines
33 2-6-1. Organize Once and Control
34 2-6-2. Avoid Name Collisions
35 3. Resource Distribution Models
36 3-1. Weights
37 3-2. Limits
38 3-3. Protections
39 3-4. Allocations
40 4. Interface Files
41 4-1. Format
42 4-2. Conventions
43 4-3. Core Interface Files
44 5. Controllers
45 5-1. CPU
46 5-1-1. CPU Interface Files
47 5-2. Memory
48 5-2-1. Memory Interface Files
49 5-2-2. Usage Guidelines
50 5-2-3. Memory Ownership
51 5-3. IO
52 5-3-1. IO Interface Files
53 5-3-2. Writeback
54 5-4. PID
55 5-4-1. PID Interface Files
Roman Gushchin4ad5a322017-12-13 19:49:03 +000056 5-5. Device
57 5-6. RDMA
58 5-6-1. RDMA Interface Files
59 5-7. Misc
60 5-7-1. perf_event
Maciej S. Szmigieroc4e08422018-01-10 23:33:19 +010061 5-N. Non-normative information
62 5-N-1. CPU controller root cgroup process behaviour
63 5-N-2. IO controller root cgroup process behaviour
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -030064 6. Namespace
65 6-1. Basics
66 6-2. The Root and Views
67 6-3. Migration and setns(2)
68 6-4. Interaction with Other Namespaces
69 P. Information on Kernel Programming
70 P-1. Filesystem Support for Writeback
71 D. Deprecated v1 Core Features
72 R. Issues with v1 and Rationales for v2
73 R-1. Multiple Hierarchies
74 R-2. Thread Granularity
75 R-3. Competition Between Inner Nodes and Threads
76 R-4. Other Interface Issues
77 R-5. Controller Issues and Remedies
78 R-5-1. Memory
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -050079
80
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -030081Introduction
82============
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -050083
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -030084Terminology
85-----------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -050086
87"cgroup" stands for "control group" and is never capitalized. The
88singular form is used to designate the whole feature and also as a
89qualifier as in "cgroup controllers". When explicitly referring to
90multiple individual control groups, the plural form "cgroups" is used.
91
92
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -030093What is cgroup?
94---------------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -050095
96cgroup is a mechanism to organize processes hierarchically and
97distribute system resources along the hierarchy in a controlled and
98configurable manner.
99
100cgroup is largely composed of two parts - the core and controllers.
101cgroup core is primarily responsible for hierarchically organizing
102processes. A cgroup controller is usually responsible for
103distributing a specific type of system resource along the hierarchy
104although there are utility controllers which serve purposes other than
105resource distribution.
106
107cgroups form a tree structure and every process in the system belongs
108to one and only one cgroup. All threads of a process belong to the
109same cgroup. On creation, all processes are put in the cgroup that
110the parent process belongs to at the time. A process can be migrated
111to another cgroup. Migration of a process doesn't affect already
112existing descendant processes.
113
114Following certain structural constraints, controllers may be enabled or
115disabled selectively on a cgroup. All controller behaviors are
116hierarchical - if a controller is enabled on a cgroup, it affects all
117processes which belong to the cgroups consisting the inclusive
118sub-hierarchy of the cgroup. When a controller is enabled on a nested
119cgroup, it always restricts the resource distribution further. The
120restrictions set closer to the root in the hierarchy can not be
121overridden from further away.
122
123
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300124Basic Operations
125================
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500126
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300127Mounting
128--------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500129
130Unlike v1, cgroup v2 has only single hierarchy. The cgroup v2
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300131hierarchy can be mounted with the following mount command::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500132
133 # mount -t cgroup2 none $MOUNT_POINT
134
135cgroup2 filesystem has the magic number 0x63677270 ("cgrp"). All
136controllers which support v2 and are not bound to a v1 hierarchy are
137automatically bound to the v2 hierarchy and show up at the root.
138Controllers which are not in active use in the v2 hierarchy can be
139bound to other hierarchies. This allows mixing v2 hierarchy with the
140legacy v1 multiple hierarchies in a fully backward compatible way.
141
142A controller can be moved across hierarchies only after the controller
143is no longer referenced in its current hierarchy. Because per-cgroup
144controller states are destroyed asynchronously and controllers may
145have lingering references, a controller may not show up immediately on
146the v2 hierarchy after the final umount of the previous hierarchy.
147Similarly, a controller should be fully disabled to be moved out of
148the unified hierarchy and it may take some time for the disabled
149controller to become available for other hierarchies; furthermore, due
150to inter-controller dependencies, other controllers may need to be
151disabled too.
152
153While useful for development and manual configurations, moving
154controllers dynamically between the v2 and other hierarchies is
155strongly discouraged for production use. It is recommended to decide
156the hierarchies and controller associations before starting using the
157controllers after system boot.
158
Johannes Weiner1619b6d2016-02-16 13:21:14 -0500159During transition to v2, system management software might still
160automount the v1 cgroup filesystem and so hijack all controllers
161during boot, before manual intervention is possible. To make testing
162and experimenting easier, the kernel parameter cgroup_no_v1= allows
163disabling controllers in v1 and make them always available in v2.
164
Tejun Heo5136f632017-06-27 14:30:28 -0400165cgroup v2 currently supports the following mount options.
166
167 nsdelegate
168
169 Consider cgroup namespaces as delegation boundaries. This
170 option is system wide and can only be set on mount or modified
171 through remount from the init namespace. The mount option is
172 ignored on non-init namespace mounts. Please refer to the
173 Delegation section for details.
174
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500175
Tejun Heo8cfd8142017-07-21 11:14:51 -0400176Organizing Processes and Threads
177--------------------------------
178
179Processes
180~~~~~~~~~
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500181
182Initially, only the root cgroup exists to which all processes belong.
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300183A child cgroup can be created by creating a sub-directory::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500184
185 # mkdir $CGROUP_NAME
186
187A given cgroup may have multiple child cgroups forming a tree
188structure. Each cgroup has a read-writable interface file
189"cgroup.procs". When read, it lists the PIDs of all processes which
190belong to the cgroup one-per-line. The PIDs are not ordered and the
191same PID may show up more than once if the process got moved to
192another cgroup and then back or the PID got recycled while reading.
193
194A process can be migrated into a cgroup by writing its PID to the
195target cgroup's "cgroup.procs" file. Only one process can be migrated
196on a single write(2) call. If a process is composed of multiple
197threads, writing the PID of any thread migrates all threads of the
198process.
199
200When a process forks a child process, the new process is born into the
201cgroup that the forking process belongs to at the time of the
202operation. After exit, a process stays associated with the cgroup
203that it belonged to at the time of exit until it's reaped; however, a
204zombie process does not appear in "cgroup.procs" and thus can't be
205moved to another cgroup.
206
207A cgroup which doesn't have any children or live processes can be
208destroyed by removing the directory. Note that a cgroup which doesn't
209have any children and is associated only with zombie processes is
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300210considered empty and can be removed::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500211
212 # rmdir $CGROUP_NAME
213
214"/proc/$PID/cgroup" lists a process's cgroup membership. If legacy
215cgroup is in use in the system, this file may contain multiple lines,
216one for each hierarchy. The entry for cgroup v2 is always in the
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300217format "0::$PATH"::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500218
219 # cat /proc/842/cgroup
220 ...
221 0::/test-cgroup/test-cgroup-nested
222
223If the process becomes a zombie and the cgroup it was associated with
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300224is removed subsequently, " (deleted)" is appended to the path::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500225
226 # cat /proc/842/cgroup
227 ...
228 0::/test-cgroup/test-cgroup-nested (deleted)
229
230
Tejun Heo8cfd8142017-07-21 11:14:51 -0400231Threads
232~~~~~~~
233
234cgroup v2 supports thread granularity for a subset of controllers to
235support use cases requiring hierarchical resource distribution across
236the threads of a group of processes. By default, all threads of a
237process belong to the same cgroup, which also serves as the resource
238domain to host resource consumptions which are not specific to a
239process or thread. The thread mode allows threads to be spread across
240a subtree while still maintaining the common resource domain for them.
241
242Controllers which support thread mode are called threaded controllers.
243The ones which don't are called domain controllers.
244
245Marking a cgroup threaded makes it join the resource domain of its
246parent as a threaded cgroup. The parent may be another threaded
247cgroup whose resource domain is further up in the hierarchy. The root
248of a threaded subtree, that is, the nearest ancestor which is not
249threaded, is called threaded domain or thread root interchangeably and
250serves as the resource domain for the entire subtree.
251
252Inside a threaded subtree, threads of a process can be put in
253different cgroups and are not subject to the no internal process
254constraint - threaded controllers can be enabled on non-leaf cgroups
255whether they have threads in them or not.
256
257As the threaded domain cgroup hosts all the domain resource
258consumptions of the subtree, it is considered to have internal
259resource consumptions whether there are processes in it or not and
260can't have populated child cgroups which aren't threaded. Because the
261root cgroup is not subject to no internal process constraint, it can
262serve both as a threaded domain and a parent to domain cgroups.
263
264The current operation mode or type of the cgroup is shown in the
265"cgroup.type" file which indicates whether the cgroup is a normal
266domain, a domain which is serving as the domain of a threaded subtree,
267or a threaded cgroup.
268
269On creation, a cgroup is always a domain cgroup and can be made
270threaded by writing "threaded" to the "cgroup.type" file. The
271operation is single direction::
272
273 # echo threaded > cgroup.type
274
275Once threaded, the cgroup can't be made a domain again. To enable the
276thread mode, the following conditions must be met.
277
278- As the cgroup will join the parent's resource domain. The parent
279 must either be a valid (threaded) domain or a threaded cgroup.
280
Tejun Heo918a8c22017-07-23 08:18:26 -0400281- When the parent is an unthreaded domain, it must not have any domain
282 controllers enabled or populated domain children. The root is
283 exempt from this requirement.
Tejun Heo8cfd8142017-07-21 11:14:51 -0400284
285Topology-wise, a cgroup can be in an invalid state. Please consider
Vladimir Rutsky2877cbe2018-01-02 17:27:41 +0100286the following topology::
Tejun Heo8cfd8142017-07-21 11:14:51 -0400287
288 A (threaded domain) - B (threaded) - C (domain, just created)
289
290C is created as a domain but isn't connected to a parent which can
291host child domains. C can't be used until it is turned into a
292threaded cgroup. "cgroup.type" file will report "domain (invalid)" in
293these cases. Operations which fail due to invalid topology use
294EOPNOTSUPP as the errno.
295
296A domain cgroup is turned into a threaded domain when one of its child
297cgroup becomes threaded or threaded controllers are enabled in the
298"cgroup.subtree_control" file while there are processes in the cgroup.
299A threaded domain reverts to a normal domain when the conditions
300clear.
301
302When read, "cgroup.threads" contains the list of the thread IDs of all
303threads in the cgroup. Except that the operations are per-thread
304instead of per-process, "cgroup.threads" has the same format and
305behaves the same way as "cgroup.procs". While "cgroup.threads" can be
306written to in any cgroup, as it can only move threads inside the same
307threaded domain, its operations are confined inside each threaded
308subtree.
309
310The threaded domain cgroup serves as the resource domain for the whole
311subtree, and, while the threads can be scattered across the subtree,
312all the processes are considered to be in the threaded domain cgroup.
313"cgroup.procs" in a threaded domain cgroup contains the PIDs of all
314processes in the subtree and is not readable in the subtree proper.
315However, "cgroup.procs" can be written to from anywhere in the subtree
316to migrate all threads of the matching process to the cgroup.
317
318Only threaded controllers can be enabled in a threaded subtree. When
319a threaded controller is enabled inside a threaded subtree, it only
320accounts for and controls resource consumptions associated with the
321threads in the cgroup and its descendants. All consumptions which
322aren't tied to a specific thread belong to the threaded domain cgroup.
323
324Because a threaded subtree is exempt from no internal process
325constraint, a threaded controller must be able to handle competition
326between threads in a non-leaf cgroup and its child cgroups. Each
327threaded controller defines how such competitions are handled.
328
329
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300330[Un]populated Notification
331--------------------------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500332
333Each non-root cgroup has a "cgroup.events" file which contains
334"populated" field indicating whether the cgroup's sub-hierarchy has
335live processes in it. Its value is 0 if there is no live process in
336the cgroup and its descendants; otherwise, 1. poll and [id]notify
337events are triggered when the value changes. This can be used, for
338example, to start a clean-up operation after all processes of a given
339sub-hierarchy have exited. The populated state updates and
340notifications are recursive. Consider the following sub-hierarchy
341where the numbers in the parentheses represent the numbers of processes
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300342in each cgroup::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500343
344 A(4) - B(0) - C(1)
345 \ D(0)
346
347A, B and C's "populated" fields would be 1 while D's 0. After the one
348process in C exits, B and C's "populated" fields would flip to "0" and
349file modified events will be generated on the "cgroup.events" files of
350both cgroups.
351
352
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300353Controlling Controllers
354-----------------------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500355
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300356Enabling and Disabling
357~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500358
359Each cgroup has a "cgroup.controllers" file which lists all
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300360controllers available for the cgroup to enable::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500361
362 # cat cgroup.controllers
363 cpu io memory
364
365No controller is enabled by default. Controllers can be enabled and
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300366disabled by writing to the "cgroup.subtree_control" file::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500367
368 # echo "+cpu +memory -io" > cgroup.subtree_control
369
370Only controllers which are listed in "cgroup.controllers" can be
371enabled. When multiple operations are specified as above, either they
372all succeed or fail. If multiple operations on the same controller
373are specified, the last one is effective.
374
375Enabling a controller in a cgroup indicates that the distribution of
376the target resource across its immediate children will be controlled.
377Consider the following sub-hierarchy. The enabled controllers are
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300378listed in parentheses::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500379
380 A(cpu,memory) - B(memory) - C()
381 \ D()
382
383As A has "cpu" and "memory" enabled, A will control the distribution
384of CPU cycles and memory to its children, in this case, B. As B has
385"memory" enabled but not "CPU", C and D will compete freely on CPU
386cycles but their division of memory available to B will be controlled.
387
388As a controller regulates the distribution of the target resource to
389the cgroup's children, enabling it creates the controller's interface
390files in the child cgroups. In the above example, enabling "cpu" on B
391would create the "cpu." prefixed controller interface files in C and
392D. Likewise, disabling "memory" from B would remove the "memory."
393prefixed controller interface files from C and D. This means that the
394controller interface files - anything which doesn't start with
395"cgroup." are owned by the parent rather than the cgroup itself.
396
397
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300398Top-down Constraint
399~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500400
401Resources are distributed top-down and a cgroup can further distribute
402a resource only if the resource has been distributed to it from the
403parent. This means that all non-root "cgroup.subtree_control" files
404can only contain controllers which are enabled in the parent's
405"cgroup.subtree_control" file. A controller can be enabled only if
406the parent has the controller enabled and a controller can't be
407disabled if one or more children have it enabled.
408
409
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300410No Internal Process Constraint
411~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500412
Tejun Heo8cfd8142017-07-21 11:14:51 -0400413Non-root cgroups can distribute domain resources to their children
414only when they don't have any processes of their own. In other words,
415only domain cgroups which don't contain any processes can have domain
416controllers enabled in their "cgroup.subtree_control" files.
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500417
Tejun Heo8cfd8142017-07-21 11:14:51 -0400418This guarantees that, when a domain controller is looking at the part
419of the hierarchy which has it enabled, processes are always only on
420the leaves. This rules out situations where child cgroups compete
421against internal processes of the parent.
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500422
423The root cgroup is exempt from this restriction. Root contains
424processes and anonymous resource consumption which can't be associated
425with any other cgroups and requires special treatment from most
426controllers. How resource consumption in the root cgroup is governed
Maciej S. Szmigieroc4e08422018-01-10 23:33:19 +0100427is up to each controller (for more information on this topic please
428refer to the Non-normative information section in the Controllers
429chapter).
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500430
431Note that the restriction doesn't get in the way if there is no
432enabled controller in the cgroup's "cgroup.subtree_control". This is
433important as otherwise it wouldn't be possible to create children of a
434populated cgroup. To control resource distribution of a cgroup, the
435cgroup must create children and transfer all its processes to the
436children before enabling controllers in its "cgroup.subtree_control"
437file.
438
439
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300440Delegation
441----------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500442
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300443Model of Delegation
444~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500445
Tejun Heo5136f632017-06-27 14:30:28 -0400446A cgroup can be delegated in two ways. First, to a less privileged
Tejun Heo8cfd8142017-07-21 11:14:51 -0400447user by granting write access of the directory and its "cgroup.procs",
448"cgroup.threads" and "cgroup.subtree_control" files to the user.
449Second, if the "nsdelegate" mount option is set, automatically to a
450cgroup namespace on namespace creation.
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500451
Tejun Heo5136f632017-06-27 14:30:28 -0400452Because the resource control interface files in a given directory
453control the distribution of the parent's resources, the delegatee
454shouldn't be allowed to write to them. For the first method, this is
455achieved by not granting access to these files. For the second, the
456kernel rejects writes to all files other than "cgroup.procs" and
457"cgroup.subtree_control" on a namespace root from inside the
458namespace.
459
460The end results are equivalent for both delegation types. Once
461delegated, the user can build sub-hierarchy under the directory,
462organize processes inside it as it sees fit and further distribute the
463resources it received from the parent. The limits and other settings
464of all resource controllers are hierarchical and regardless of what
465happens in the delegated sub-hierarchy, nothing can escape the
466resource restrictions imposed by the parent.
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500467
468Currently, cgroup doesn't impose any restrictions on the number of
469cgroups in or nesting depth of a delegated sub-hierarchy; however,
470this may be limited explicitly in the future.
471
472
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300473Delegation Containment
474~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500475
476A delegated sub-hierarchy is contained in the sense that processes
Tejun Heo5136f632017-06-27 14:30:28 -0400477can't be moved into or out of the sub-hierarchy by the delegatee.
478
479For delegations to a less privileged user, this is achieved by
480requiring the following conditions for a process with a non-root euid
481to migrate a target process into a cgroup by writing its PID to the
482"cgroup.procs" file.
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500483
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500484- The writer must have write access to the "cgroup.procs" file.
485
486- The writer must have write access to the "cgroup.procs" file of the
487 common ancestor of the source and destination cgroups.
488
Tejun Heo576dd462017-01-20 11:29:54 -0500489The above two constraints ensure that while a delegatee may migrate
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500490processes around freely in the delegated sub-hierarchy it can't pull
491in from or push out to outside the sub-hierarchy.
492
493For an example, let's assume cgroups C0 and C1 have been delegated to
494user U0 who created C00, C01 under C0 and C10 under C1 as follows and
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300495all processes under C0 and C1 belong to U0::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500496
497 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ - C0 - C00
498 ~ cgroup ~ \ C01
499 ~ hierarchy ~
500 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ - C1 - C10
501
502Let's also say U0 wants to write the PID of a process which is
503currently in C10 into "C00/cgroup.procs". U0 has write access to the
Tejun Heo576dd462017-01-20 11:29:54 -0500504file; however, the common ancestor of the source cgroup C10 and the
505destination cgroup C00 is above the points of delegation and U0 would
506not have write access to its "cgroup.procs" files and thus the write
507will be denied with -EACCES.
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500508
Tejun Heo5136f632017-06-27 14:30:28 -0400509For delegations to namespaces, containment is achieved by requiring
510that both the source and destination cgroups are reachable from the
511namespace of the process which is attempting the migration. If either
512is not reachable, the migration is rejected with -ENOENT.
513
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500514
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300515Guidelines
516----------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500517
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300518Organize Once and Control
519~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500520
521Migrating a process across cgroups is a relatively expensive operation
522and stateful resources such as memory are not moved together with the
523process. This is an explicit design decision as there often exist
524inherent trade-offs between migration and various hot paths in terms
525of synchronization cost.
526
527As such, migrating processes across cgroups frequently as a means to
528apply different resource restrictions is discouraged. A workload
529should be assigned to a cgroup according to the system's logical and
530resource structure once on start-up. Dynamic adjustments to resource
531distribution can be made by changing controller configuration through
532the interface files.
533
534
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300535Avoid Name Collisions
536~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500537
538Interface files for a cgroup and its children cgroups occupy the same
539directory and it is possible to create children cgroups which collide
540with interface files.
541
542All cgroup core interface files are prefixed with "cgroup." and each
543controller's interface files are prefixed with the controller name and
544a dot. A controller's name is composed of lower case alphabets and
545'_'s but never begins with an '_' so it can be used as the prefix
546character for collision avoidance. Also, interface file names won't
547start or end with terms which are often used in categorizing workloads
548such as job, service, slice, unit or workload.
549
550cgroup doesn't do anything to prevent name collisions and it's the
551user's responsibility to avoid them.
552
553
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300554Resource Distribution Models
555============================
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500556
557cgroup controllers implement several resource distribution schemes
558depending on the resource type and expected use cases. This section
559describes major schemes in use along with their expected behaviors.
560
561
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300562Weights
563-------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500564
565A parent's resource is distributed by adding up the weights of all
566active children and giving each the fraction matching the ratio of its
567weight against the sum. As only children which can make use of the
568resource at the moment participate in the distribution, this is
569work-conserving. Due to the dynamic nature, this model is usually
570used for stateless resources.
571
572All weights are in the range [1, 10000] with the default at 100. This
573allows symmetric multiplicative biases in both directions at fine
574enough granularity while staying in the intuitive range.
575
576As long as the weight is in range, all configuration combinations are
577valid and there is no reason to reject configuration changes or
578process migrations.
579
580"cpu.weight" proportionally distributes CPU cycles to active children
581and is an example of this type.
582
583
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300584Limits
585------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500586
587A child can only consume upto the configured amount of the resource.
588Limits can be over-committed - the sum of the limits of children can
589exceed the amount of resource available to the parent.
590
591Limits are in the range [0, max] and defaults to "max", which is noop.
592
593As limits can be over-committed, all configuration combinations are
594valid and there is no reason to reject configuration changes or
595process migrations.
596
597"io.max" limits the maximum BPS and/or IOPS that a cgroup can consume
598on an IO device and is an example of this type.
599
600
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300601Protections
602-----------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500603
604A cgroup is protected to be allocated upto the configured amount of
605the resource if the usages of all its ancestors are under their
606protected levels. Protections can be hard guarantees or best effort
607soft boundaries. Protections can also be over-committed in which case
608only upto the amount available to the parent is protected among
609children.
610
611Protections are in the range [0, max] and defaults to 0, which is
612noop.
613
614As protections can be over-committed, all configuration combinations
615are valid and there is no reason to reject configuration changes or
616process migrations.
617
618"memory.low" implements best-effort memory protection and is an
619example of this type.
620
621
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300622Allocations
623-----------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500624
625A cgroup is exclusively allocated a certain amount of a finite
626resource. Allocations can't be over-committed - the sum of the
627allocations of children can not exceed the amount of resource
628available to the parent.
629
630Allocations are in the range [0, max] and defaults to 0, which is no
631resource.
632
633As allocations can't be over-committed, some configuration
634combinations are invalid and should be rejected. Also, if the
635resource is mandatory for execution of processes, process migrations
636may be rejected.
637
638"cpu.rt.max" hard-allocates realtime slices and is an example of this
639type.
640
641
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300642Interface Files
643===============
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500644
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300645Format
646------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500647
648All interface files should be in one of the following formats whenever
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300649possible::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500650
651 New-line separated values
652 (when only one value can be written at once)
653
654 VAL0\n
655 VAL1\n
656 ...
657
658 Space separated values
659 (when read-only or multiple values can be written at once)
660
661 VAL0 VAL1 ...\n
662
663 Flat keyed
664
665 KEY0 VAL0\n
666 KEY1 VAL1\n
667 ...
668
669 Nested keyed
670
671 KEY0 SUB_KEY0=VAL00 SUB_KEY1=VAL01...
672 KEY1 SUB_KEY0=VAL10 SUB_KEY1=VAL11...
673 ...
674
675For a writable file, the format for writing should generally match
676reading; however, controllers may allow omitting later fields or
677implement restricted shortcuts for most common use cases.
678
679For both flat and nested keyed files, only the values for a single key
680can be written at a time. For nested keyed files, the sub key pairs
681may be specified in any order and not all pairs have to be specified.
682
683
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300684Conventions
685-----------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500686
687- Settings for a single feature should be contained in a single file.
688
689- The root cgroup should be exempt from resource control and thus
690 shouldn't have resource control interface files. Also,
691 informational files on the root cgroup which end up showing global
692 information available elsewhere shouldn't exist.
693
694- If a controller implements weight based resource distribution, its
695 interface file should be named "weight" and have the range [1,
696 10000] with 100 as the default. The values are chosen to allow
697 enough and symmetric bias in both directions while keeping it
698 intuitive (the default is 100%).
699
700- If a controller implements an absolute resource guarantee and/or
701 limit, the interface files should be named "min" and "max"
702 respectively. If a controller implements best effort resource
703 guarantee and/or limit, the interface files should be named "low"
704 and "high" respectively.
705
706 In the above four control files, the special token "max" should be
707 used to represent upward infinity for both reading and writing.
708
709- If a setting has a configurable default value and keyed specific
710 overrides, the default entry should be keyed with "default" and
711 appear as the first entry in the file.
712
713 The default value can be updated by writing either "default $VAL" or
714 "$VAL".
715
716 When writing to update a specific override, "default" can be used as
717 the value to indicate removal of the override. Override entries
718 with "default" as the value must not appear when read.
719
720 For example, a setting which is keyed by major:minor device numbers
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300721 with integer values may look like the following::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500722
723 # cat cgroup-example-interface-file
724 default 150
725 8:0 300
726
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300727 The default value can be updated by::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500728
729 # echo 125 > cgroup-example-interface-file
730
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300731 or::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500732
733 # echo "default 125" > cgroup-example-interface-file
734
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300735 An override can be set by::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500736
737 # echo "8:16 170" > cgroup-example-interface-file
738
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300739 and cleared by::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500740
741 # echo "8:0 default" > cgroup-example-interface-file
742 # cat cgroup-example-interface-file
743 default 125
744 8:16 170
745
746- For events which are not very high frequency, an interface file
747 "events" should be created which lists event key value pairs.
748 Whenever a notifiable event happens, file modified event should be
749 generated on the file.
750
751
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300752Core Interface Files
753--------------------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500754
755All cgroup core files are prefixed with "cgroup."
756
Tejun Heo8cfd8142017-07-21 11:14:51 -0400757 cgroup.type
758
759 A read-write single value file which exists on non-root
760 cgroups.
761
762 When read, it indicates the current type of the cgroup, which
763 can be one of the following values.
764
765 - "domain" : A normal valid domain cgroup.
766
767 - "domain threaded" : A threaded domain cgroup which is
768 serving as the root of a threaded subtree.
769
770 - "domain invalid" : A cgroup which is in an invalid state.
771 It can't be populated or have controllers enabled. It may
772 be allowed to become a threaded cgroup.
773
774 - "threaded" : A threaded cgroup which is a member of a
775 threaded subtree.
776
777 A cgroup can be turned into a threaded cgroup by writing
778 "threaded" to this file.
779
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500780 cgroup.procs
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500781 A read-write new-line separated values file which exists on
782 all cgroups.
783
784 When read, it lists the PIDs of all processes which belong to
785 the cgroup one-per-line. The PIDs are not ordered and the
786 same PID may show up more than once if the process got moved
787 to another cgroup and then back or the PID got recycled while
788 reading.
789
790 A PID can be written to migrate the process associated with
791 the PID to the cgroup. The writer should match all of the
792 following conditions.
793
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500794 - It must have write access to the "cgroup.procs" file.
795
796 - It must have write access to the "cgroup.procs" file of the
797 common ancestor of the source and destination cgroups.
798
799 When delegating a sub-hierarchy, write access to this file
800 should be granted along with the containing directory.
801
Tejun Heo8cfd8142017-07-21 11:14:51 -0400802 In a threaded cgroup, reading this file fails with EOPNOTSUPP
803 as all the processes belong to the thread root. Writing is
804 supported and moves every thread of the process to the cgroup.
805
806 cgroup.threads
807 A read-write new-line separated values file which exists on
808 all cgroups.
809
810 When read, it lists the TIDs of all threads which belong to
811 the cgroup one-per-line. The TIDs are not ordered and the
812 same TID may show up more than once if the thread got moved to
813 another cgroup and then back or the TID got recycled while
814 reading.
815
816 A TID can be written to migrate the thread associated with the
817 TID to the cgroup. The writer should match all of the
818 following conditions.
819
820 - It must have write access to the "cgroup.threads" file.
821
822 - The cgroup that the thread is currently in must be in the
823 same resource domain as the destination cgroup.
824
825 - It must have write access to the "cgroup.procs" file of the
826 common ancestor of the source and destination cgroups.
827
828 When delegating a sub-hierarchy, write access to this file
829 should be granted along with the containing directory.
830
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500831 cgroup.controllers
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500832 A read-only space separated values file which exists on all
833 cgroups.
834
835 It shows space separated list of all controllers available to
836 the cgroup. The controllers are not ordered.
837
838 cgroup.subtree_control
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500839 A read-write space separated values file which exists on all
840 cgroups. Starts out empty.
841
842 When read, it shows space separated list of the controllers
843 which are enabled to control resource distribution from the
844 cgroup to its children.
845
846 Space separated list of controllers prefixed with '+' or '-'
847 can be written to enable or disable controllers. A controller
848 name prefixed with '+' enables the controller and '-'
849 disables. If a controller appears more than once on the list,
850 the last one is effective. When multiple enable and disable
851 operations are specified, either all succeed or all fail.
852
853 cgroup.events
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500854 A read-only flat-keyed file which exists on non-root cgroups.
855 The following entries are defined. Unless specified
856 otherwise, a value change in this file generates a file
857 modified event.
858
859 populated
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500860 1 if the cgroup or its descendants contains any live
861 processes; otherwise, 0.
862
Roman Gushchin1a926e02017-07-28 18:28:44 +0100863 cgroup.max.descendants
864 A read-write single value files. The default is "max".
865
866 Maximum allowed number of descent cgroups.
867 If the actual number of descendants is equal or larger,
868 an attempt to create a new cgroup in the hierarchy will fail.
869
870 cgroup.max.depth
871 A read-write single value files. The default is "max".
872
873 Maximum allowed descent depth below the current cgroup.
874 If the actual descent depth is equal or larger,
875 an attempt to create a new child cgroup will fail.
876
Roman Gushchinec392252017-08-02 17:55:31 +0100877 cgroup.stat
878 A read-only flat-keyed file with the following entries:
879
880 nr_descendants
881 Total number of visible descendant cgroups.
882
883 nr_dying_descendants
884 Total number of dying descendant cgroups. A cgroup becomes
885 dying after being deleted by a user. The cgroup will remain
886 in dying state for some time undefined time (which can depend
887 on system load) before being completely destroyed.
888
889 A process can't enter a dying cgroup under any circumstances,
890 a dying cgroup can't revive.
891
892 A dying cgroup can consume system resources not exceeding
893 limits, which were active at the moment of cgroup deletion.
894
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500895
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300896Controllers
897===========
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500898
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300899CPU
900---
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500901
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500902The "cpu" controllers regulates distribution of CPU cycles. This
903controller implements weight and absolute bandwidth limit models for
904normal scheduling policy and absolute bandwidth allocation model for
905realtime scheduling policy.
906
Tejun Heoc2f31b72017-12-05 09:10:17 -0800907WARNING: cgroup2 doesn't yet support control of realtime processes and
908the cpu controller can only be enabled when all RT processes are in
909the root cgroup. Be aware that system management software may already
910have placed RT processes into nonroot cgroups during the system boot
911process, and these processes may need to be moved to the root cgroup
912before the cpu controller can be enabled.
913
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500914
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300915CPU Interface Files
916~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500917
918All time durations are in microseconds.
919
920 cpu.stat
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500921 A read-only flat-keyed file which exists on non-root cgroups.
Tejun Heod41bf8c2017-10-23 16:18:27 -0700922 This file exists whether the controller is enabled or not.
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500923
Tejun Heod41bf8c2017-10-23 16:18:27 -0700924 It always reports the following three stats:
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500925
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300926 - usage_usec
927 - user_usec
928 - system_usec
Tejun Heod41bf8c2017-10-23 16:18:27 -0700929
930 and the following three when the controller is enabled:
931
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300932 - nr_periods
933 - nr_throttled
934 - throttled_usec
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500935
936 cpu.weight
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500937 A read-write single value file which exists on non-root
938 cgroups. The default is "100".
939
940 The weight in the range [1, 10000].
941
Tejun Heo0d593632017-09-25 09:00:19 -0700942 cpu.weight.nice
943 A read-write single value file which exists on non-root
944 cgroups. The default is "0".
945
946 The nice value is in the range [-20, 19].
947
948 This interface file is an alternative interface for
949 "cpu.weight" and allows reading and setting weight using the
950 same values used by nice(2). Because the range is smaller and
951 granularity is coarser for the nice values, the read value is
952 the closest approximation of the current weight.
953
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500954 cpu.max
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500955 A read-write two value file which exists on non-root cgroups.
956 The default is "max 100000".
957
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300958 The maximum bandwidth limit. It's in the following format::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500959
960 $MAX $PERIOD
961
962 which indicates that the group may consume upto $MAX in each
963 $PERIOD duration. "max" for $MAX indicates no limit. If only
964 one number is written, $MAX is updated.
965
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500966
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300967Memory
968------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500969
970The "memory" controller regulates distribution of memory. Memory is
971stateful and implements both limit and protection models. Due to the
972intertwining between memory usage and reclaim pressure and the
973stateful nature of memory, the distribution model is relatively
974complex.
975
976While not completely water-tight, all major memory usages by a given
977cgroup are tracked so that the total memory consumption can be
978accounted and controlled to a reasonable extent. Currently, the
979following types of memory usages are tracked.
980
981- Userland memory - page cache and anonymous memory.
982
983- Kernel data structures such as dentries and inodes.
984
985- TCP socket buffers.
986
987The above list may expand in the future for better coverage.
988
989
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -0300990Memory Interface Files
991~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500992
993All memory amounts are in bytes. If a value which is not aligned to
994PAGE_SIZE is written, the value may be rounded up to the closest
995PAGE_SIZE multiple when read back.
996
997 memory.current
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -0500998 A read-only single value file which exists on non-root
999 cgroups.
1000
1001 The total amount of memory currently being used by the cgroup
1002 and its descendants.
1003
1004 memory.low
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001005 A read-write single value file which exists on non-root
1006 cgroups. The default is "0".
1007
1008 Best-effort memory protection. If the memory usages of a
1009 cgroup and all its ancestors are below their low boundaries,
1010 the cgroup's memory won't be reclaimed unless memory can be
1011 reclaimed from unprotected cgroups.
1012
1013 Putting more memory than generally available under this
1014 protection is discouraged.
1015
1016 memory.high
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001017 A read-write single value file which exists on non-root
1018 cgroups. The default is "max".
1019
1020 Memory usage throttle limit. This is the main mechanism to
1021 control memory usage of a cgroup. If a cgroup's usage goes
1022 over the high boundary, the processes of the cgroup are
1023 throttled and put under heavy reclaim pressure.
1024
1025 Going over the high limit never invokes the OOM killer and
1026 under extreme conditions the limit may be breached.
1027
1028 memory.max
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001029 A read-write single value file which exists on non-root
1030 cgroups. The default is "max".
1031
1032 Memory usage hard limit. This is the final protection
1033 mechanism. If a cgroup's memory usage reaches this limit and
1034 can't be reduced, the OOM killer is invoked in the cgroup.
1035 Under certain circumstances, the usage may go over the limit
1036 temporarily.
1037
1038 This is the ultimate protection mechanism. As long as the
1039 high limit is used and monitored properly, this limit's
1040 utility is limited to providing the final safety net.
1041
1042 memory.events
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001043 A read-only flat-keyed file which exists on non-root cgroups.
1044 The following entries are defined. Unless specified
1045 otherwise, a value change in this file generates a file
1046 modified event.
1047
1048 low
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001049 The number of times the cgroup is reclaimed due to
1050 high memory pressure even though its usage is under
1051 the low boundary. This usually indicates that the low
1052 boundary is over-committed.
1053
1054 high
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001055 The number of times processes of the cgroup are
1056 throttled and routed to perform direct memory reclaim
1057 because the high memory boundary was exceeded. For a
1058 cgroup whose memory usage is capped by the high limit
1059 rather than global memory pressure, this event's
1060 occurrences are expected.
1061
1062 max
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001063 The number of times the cgroup's memory usage was
1064 about to go over the max boundary. If direct reclaim
Konstantin Khlebnikov8e675f72017-07-06 15:40:28 -07001065 fails to bring it down, the cgroup goes to OOM state.
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001066
1067 oom
Konstantin Khlebnikov8e675f72017-07-06 15:40:28 -07001068 The number of time the cgroup's memory usage was
1069 reached the limit and allocation was about to fail.
1070
1071 Depending on context result could be invocation of OOM
Vladimir Rutsky2877cbe2018-01-02 17:27:41 +01001072 killer and retrying allocation or failing allocation.
Konstantin Khlebnikov8e675f72017-07-06 15:40:28 -07001073
1074 Failed allocation in its turn could be returned into
Vladimir Rutsky2877cbe2018-01-02 17:27:41 +01001075 userspace as -ENOMEM or silently ignored in cases like
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001076 disk readahead. For now OOM in memory cgroup kills
Konstantin Khlebnikov8e675f72017-07-06 15:40:28 -07001077 tasks iff shortage has happened inside page fault.
1078
1079 oom_kill
Konstantin Khlebnikov8e675f72017-07-06 15:40:28 -07001080 The number of processes belonging to this cgroup
1081 killed by any kind of OOM killer.
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001082
Johannes Weiner587d9f72016-01-20 15:03:19 -08001083 memory.stat
Johannes Weiner587d9f72016-01-20 15:03:19 -08001084 A read-only flat-keyed file which exists on non-root cgroups.
1085
1086 This breaks down the cgroup's memory footprint into different
1087 types of memory, type-specific details, and other information
1088 on the state and past events of the memory management system.
1089
1090 All memory amounts are in bytes.
1091
1092 The entries are ordered to be human readable, and new entries
1093 can show up in the middle. Don't rely on items remaining in a
1094 fixed position; use the keys to look up specific values!
1095
1096 anon
Johannes Weiner587d9f72016-01-20 15:03:19 -08001097 Amount of memory used in anonymous mappings such as
1098 brk(), sbrk(), and mmap(MAP_ANONYMOUS)
1099
1100 file
Johannes Weiner587d9f72016-01-20 15:03:19 -08001101 Amount of memory used to cache filesystem data,
1102 including tmpfs and shared memory.
1103
Vladimir Davydov12580e42016-03-17 14:17:38 -07001104 kernel_stack
Vladimir Davydov12580e42016-03-17 14:17:38 -07001105 Amount of memory allocated to kernel stacks.
1106
Vladimir Davydov27ee57c2016-03-17 14:17:35 -07001107 slab
Vladimir Davydov27ee57c2016-03-17 14:17:35 -07001108 Amount of memory used for storing in-kernel data
1109 structures.
1110
Johannes Weiner4758e192016-02-02 16:57:41 -08001111 sock
Johannes Weiner4758e192016-02-02 16:57:41 -08001112 Amount of memory used in network transmission buffers
1113
Johannes Weiner9a4caf12017-05-03 14:52:45 -07001114 shmem
Johannes Weiner9a4caf12017-05-03 14:52:45 -07001115 Amount of cached filesystem data that is swap-backed,
1116 such as tmpfs, shm segments, shared anonymous mmap()s
1117
Johannes Weiner587d9f72016-01-20 15:03:19 -08001118 file_mapped
Johannes Weiner587d9f72016-01-20 15:03:19 -08001119 Amount of cached filesystem data mapped with mmap()
1120
1121 file_dirty
Johannes Weiner587d9f72016-01-20 15:03:19 -08001122 Amount of cached filesystem data that was modified but
1123 not yet written back to disk
1124
1125 file_writeback
Johannes Weiner587d9f72016-01-20 15:03:19 -08001126 Amount of cached filesystem data that was modified and
1127 is currently being written back to disk
1128
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001129 inactive_anon, active_anon, inactive_file, active_file, unevictable
Johannes Weiner587d9f72016-01-20 15:03:19 -08001130 Amount of memory, swap-backed and filesystem-backed,
1131 on the internal memory management lists used by the
1132 page reclaim algorithm
1133
Vladimir Davydov27ee57c2016-03-17 14:17:35 -07001134 slab_reclaimable
Vladimir Davydov27ee57c2016-03-17 14:17:35 -07001135 Part of "slab" that might be reclaimed, such as
1136 dentries and inodes.
1137
1138 slab_unreclaimable
Vladimir Davydov27ee57c2016-03-17 14:17:35 -07001139 Part of "slab" that cannot be reclaimed on memory
1140 pressure.
1141
Johannes Weiner587d9f72016-01-20 15:03:19 -08001142 pgfault
Johannes Weiner587d9f72016-01-20 15:03:19 -08001143 Total number of page faults incurred
1144
1145 pgmajfault
Johannes Weiner587d9f72016-01-20 15:03:19 -08001146 Number of major page faults incurred
1147
Roman Gushchinb3409592017-05-12 15:47:09 -07001148 workingset_refault
1149
1150 Number of refaults of previously evicted pages
1151
1152 workingset_activate
1153
1154 Number of refaulted pages that were immediately activated
1155
1156 workingset_nodereclaim
1157
1158 Number of times a shadow node has been reclaimed
1159
Roman Gushchin22621852017-07-06 15:40:25 -07001160 pgrefill
1161
1162 Amount of scanned pages (in an active LRU list)
1163
1164 pgscan
1165
1166 Amount of scanned pages (in an inactive LRU list)
1167
1168 pgsteal
1169
1170 Amount of reclaimed pages
1171
1172 pgactivate
1173
1174 Amount of pages moved to the active LRU list
1175
1176 pgdeactivate
1177
1178 Amount of pages moved to the inactive LRU lis
1179
1180 pglazyfree
1181
1182 Amount of pages postponed to be freed under memory pressure
1183
1184 pglazyfreed
1185
1186 Amount of reclaimed lazyfree pages
1187
Vladimir Davydov3e24b192016-01-20 15:03:13 -08001188 memory.swap.current
Vladimir Davydov3e24b192016-01-20 15:03:13 -08001189 A read-only single value file which exists on non-root
1190 cgroups.
1191
1192 The total amount of swap currently being used by the cgroup
1193 and its descendants.
1194
1195 memory.swap.max
Vladimir Davydov3e24b192016-01-20 15:03:13 -08001196 A read-write single value file which exists on non-root
1197 cgroups. The default is "max".
1198
1199 Swap usage hard limit. If a cgroup's swap usage reaches this
Vladimir Rutsky2877cbe2018-01-02 17:27:41 +01001200 limit, anonymous memory of the cgroup will not be swapped out.
Vladimir Davydov3e24b192016-01-20 15:03:13 -08001201
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001202
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001203Usage Guidelines
1204~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001205
1206"memory.high" is the main mechanism to control memory usage.
1207Over-committing on high limit (sum of high limits > available memory)
1208and letting global memory pressure to distribute memory according to
1209usage is a viable strategy.
1210
1211Because breach of the high limit doesn't trigger the OOM killer but
1212throttles the offending cgroup, a management agent has ample
1213opportunities to monitor and take appropriate actions such as granting
1214more memory or terminating the workload.
1215
1216Determining whether a cgroup has enough memory is not trivial as
1217memory usage doesn't indicate whether the workload can benefit from
1218more memory. For example, a workload which writes data received from
1219network to a file can use all available memory but can also operate as
1220performant with a small amount of memory. A measure of memory
1221pressure - how much the workload is being impacted due to lack of
1222memory - is necessary to determine whether a workload needs more
1223memory; unfortunately, memory pressure monitoring mechanism isn't
1224implemented yet.
1225
1226
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001227Memory Ownership
1228~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001229
1230A memory area is charged to the cgroup which instantiated it and stays
1231charged to the cgroup until the area is released. Migrating a process
1232to a different cgroup doesn't move the memory usages that it
1233instantiated while in the previous cgroup to the new cgroup.
1234
1235A memory area may be used by processes belonging to different cgroups.
1236To which cgroup the area will be charged is in-deterministic; however,
1237over time, the memory area is likely to end up in a cgroup which has
1238enough memory allowance to avoid high reclaim pressure.
1239
1240If a cgroup sweeps a considerable amount of memory which is expected
1241to be accessed repeatedly by other cgroups, it may make sense to use
1242POSIX_FADV_DONTNEED to relinquish the ownership of memory areas
1243belonging to the affected files to ensure correct memory ownership.
1244
1245
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001246IO
1247--
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001248
1249The "io" controller regulates the distribution of IO resources. This
1250controller implements both weight based and absolute bandwidth or IOPS
1251limit distribution; however, weight based distribution is available
1252only if cfq-iosched is in use and neither scheme is available for
1253blk-mq devices.
1254
1255
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001256IO Interface Files
1257~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001258
1259 io.stat
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001260 A read-only nested-keyed file which exists on non-root
1261 cgroups.
1262
1263 Lines are keyed by $MAJ:$MIN device numbers and not ordered.
1264 The following nested keys are defined.
1265
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001266 ====== ===================
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001267 rbytes Bytes read
1268 wbytes Bytes written
1269 rios Number of read IOs
1270 wios Number of write IOs
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001271 ====== ===================
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001272
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001273 An example read output follows:
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001274
1275 8:16 rbytes=1459200 wbytes=314773504 rios=192 wios=353
1276 8:0 rbytes=90430464 wbytes=299008000 rios=8950 wios=1252
1277
1278 io.weight
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001279 A read-write flat-keyed file which exists on non-root cgroups.
1280 The default is "default 100".
1281
1282 The first line is the default weight applied to devices
1283 without specific override. The rest are overrides keyed by
1284 $MAJ:$MIN device numbers and not ordered. The weights are in
1285 the range [1, 10000] and specifies the relative amount IO time
1286 the cgroup can use in relation to its siblings.
1287
1288 The default weight can be updated by writing either "default
1289 $WEIGHT" or simply "$WEIGHT". Overrides can be set by writing
1290 "$MAJ:$MIN $WEIGHT" and unset by writing "$MAJ:$MIN default".
1291
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001292 An example read output follows::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001293
1294 default 100
1295 8:16 200
1296 8:0 50
1297
1298 io.max
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001299 A read-write nested-keyed file which exists on non-root
1300 cgroups.
1301
1302 BPS and IOPS based IO limit. Lines are keyed by $MAJ:$MIN
1303 device numbers and not ordered. The following nested keys are
1304 defined.
1305
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001306 ===== ==================================
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001307 rbps Max read bytes per second
1308 wbps Max write bytes per second
1309 riops Max read IO operations per second
1310 wiops Max write IO operations per second
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001311 ===== ==================================
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001312
1313 When writing, any number of nested key-value pairs can be
1314 specified in any order. "max" can be specified as the value
1315 to remove a specific limit. If the same key is specified
1316 multiple times, the outcome is undefined.
1317
1318 BPS and IOPS are measured in each IO direction and IOs are
1319 delayed if limit is reached. Temporary bursts are allowed.
1320
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001321 Setting read limit at 2M BPS and write at 120 IOPS for 8:16::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001322
1323 echo "8:16 rbps=2097152 wiops=120" > io.max
1324
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001325 Reading returns the following::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001326
1327 8:16 rbps=2097152 wbps=max riops=max wiops=120
1328
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001329 Write IOPS limit can be removed by writing the following::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001330
1331 echo "8:16 wiops=max" > io.max
1332
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001333 Reading now returns the following::
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001334
1335 8:16 rbps=2097152 wbps=max riops=max wiops=max
1336
1337
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001338Writeback
1339~~~~~~~~~
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001340
1341Page cache is dirtied through buffered writes and shared mmaps and
1342written asynchronously to the backing filesystem by the writeback
1343mechanism. Writeback sits between the memory and IO domains and
1344regulates the proportion of dirty memory by balancing dirtying and
1345write IOs.
1346
1347The io controller, in conjunction with the memory controller,
1348implements control of page cache writeback IOs. The memory controller
1349defines the memory domain that dirty memory ratio is calculated and
1350maintained for and the io controller defines the io domain which
1351writes out dirty pages for the memory domain. Both system-wide and
1352per-cgroup dirty memory states are examined and the more restrictive
1353of the two is enforced.
1354
1355cgroup writeback requires explicit support from the underlying
1356filesystem. Currently, cgroup writeback is implemented on ext2, ext4
1357and btrfs. On other filesystems, all writeback IOs are attributed to
1358the root cgroup.
1359
1360There are inherent differences in memory and writeback management
1361which affects how cgroup ownership is tracked. Memory is tracked per
1362page while writeback per inode. For the purpose of writeback, an
1363inode is assigned to a cgroup and all IO requests to write dirty pages
1364from the inode are attributed to that cgroup.
1365
1366As cgroup ownership for memory is tracked per page, there can be pages
1367which are associated with different cgroups than the one the inode is
1368associated with. These are called foreign pages. The writeback
1369constantly keeps track of foreign pages and, if a particular foreign
1370cgroup becomes the majority over a certain period of time, switches
1371the ownership of the inode to that cgroup.
1372
1373While this model is enough for most use cases where a given inode is
1374mostly dirtied by a single cgroup even when the main writing cgroup
1375changes over time, use cases where multiple cgroups write to a single
1376inode simultaneously are not supported well. In such circumstances, a
1377significant portion of IOs are likely to be attributed incorrectly.
1378As memory controller assigns page ownership on the first use and
1379doesn't update it until the page is released, even if writeback
1380strictly follows page ownership, multiple cgroups dirtying overlapping
1381areas wouldn't work as expected. It's recommended to avoid such usage
1382patterns.
1383
1384The sysctl knobs which affect writeback behavior are applied to cgroup
1385writeback as follows.
1386
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001387 vm.dirty_background_ratio, vm.dirty_ratio
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001388 These ratios apply the same to cgroup writeback with the
1389 amount of available memory capped by limits imposed by the
1390 memory controller and system-wide clean memory.
1391
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001392 vm.dirty_background_bytes, vm.dirty_bytes
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001393 For cgroup writeback, this is calculated into ratio against
1394 total available memory and applied the same way as
1395 vm.dirty[_background]_ratio.
1396
1397
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001398PID
1399---
Hans Ragas20c56e52017-01-10 17:42:34 +00001400
1401The process number controller is used to allow a cgroup to stop any
1402new tasks from being fork()'d or clone()'d after a specified limit is
1403reached.
1404
1405The number of tasks in a cgroup can be exhausted in ways which other
1406controllers cannot prevent, thus warranting its own controller. For
1407example, a fork bomb is likely to exhaust the number of tasks before
1408hitting memory restrictions.
1409
1410Note that PIDs used in this controller refer to TIDs, process IDs as
1411used by the kernel.
1412
1413
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001414PID Interface Files
1415~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Hans Ragas20c56e52017-01-10 17:42:34 +00001416
1417 pids.max
Tobias Klauser312eb712017-02-17 18:44:11 +01001418 A read-write single value file which exists on non-root
1419 cgroups. The default is "max".
Hans Ragas20c56e52017-01-10 17:42:34 +00001420
Tobias Klauser312eb712017-02-17 18:44:11 +01001421 Hard limit of number of processes.
Hans Ragas20c56e52017-01-10 17:42:34 +00001422
1423 pids.current
Tobias Klauser312eb712017-02-17 18:44:11 +01001424 A read-only single value file which exists on all cgroups.
Hans Ragas20c56e52017-01-10 17:42:34 +00001425
Tobias Klauser312eb712017-02-17 18:44:11 +01001426 The number of processes currently in the cgroup and its
1427 descendants.
Hans Ragas20c56e52017-01-10 17:42:34 +00001428
1429Organisational operations are not blocked by cgroup policies, so it is
1430possible to have pids.current > pids.max. This can be done by either
1431setting the limit to be smaller than pids.current, or attaching enough
1432processes to the cgroup such that pids.current is larger than
1433pids.max. However, it is not possible to violate a cgroup PID policy
1434through fork() or clone(). These will return -EAGAIN if the creation
1435of a new process would cause a cgroup policy to be violated.
1436
1437
Roman Gushchin4ad5a322017-12-13 19:49:03 +00001438Device controller
1439-----------------
1440
1441Device controller manages access to device files. It includes both
1442creation of new device files (using mknod), and access to the
1443existing device files.
1444
1445Cgroup v2 device controller has no interface files and is implemented
1446on top of cgroup BPF. To control access to device files, a user may
1447create bpf programs of the BPF_CGROUP_DEVICE type and attach them
1448to cgroups. On an attempt to access a device file, corresponding
1449BPF programs will be executed, and depending on the return value
1450the attempt will succeed or fail with -EPERM.
1451
1452A BPF_CGROUP_DEVICE program takes a pointer to the bpf_cgroup_dev_ctx
1453structure, which describes the device access attempt: access type
1454(mknod/read/write) and device (type, major and minor numbers).
1455If the program returns 0, the attempt fails with -EPERM, otherwise
1456it succeeds.
1457
1458An example of BPF_CGROUP_DEVICE program may be found in the kernel
1459source tree in the tools/testing/selftests/bpf/dev_cgroup.c file.
1460
1461
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001462RDMA
1463----
Tejun Heo968ebff2017-01-29 14:35:20 -05001464
Parav Pandit9c1e67f2017-01-10 00:02:15 +00001465The "rdma" controller regulates the distribution and accounting of
1466of RDMA resources.
1467
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001468RDMA Interface Files
1469~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Parav Pandit9c1e67f2017-01-10 00:02:15 +00001470
1471 rdma.max
1472 A readwrite nested-keyed file that exists for all the cgroups
1473 except root that describes current configured resource limit
1474 for a RDMA/IB device.
1475
1476 Lines are keyed by device name and are not ordered.
1477 Each line contains space separated resource name and its configured
1478 limit that can be distributed.
1479
1480 The following nested keys are defined.
1481
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001482 ========== =============================
Parav Pandit9c1e67f2017-01-10 00:02:15 +00001483 hca_handle Maximum number of HCA Handles
1484 hca_object Maximum number of HCA Objects
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001485 ========== =============================
Parav Pandit9c1e67f2017-01-10 00:02:15 +00001486
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001487 An example for mlx4 and ocrdma device follows::
Parav Pandit9c1e67f2017-01-10 00:02:15 +00001488
1489 mlx4_0 hca_handle=2 hca_object=2000
1490 ocrdma1 hca_handle=3 hca_object=max
1491
1492 rdma.current
1493 A read-only file that describes current resource usage.
1494 It exists for all the cgroup except root.
1495
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001496 An example for mlx4 and ocrdma device follows::
Parav Pandit9c1e67f2017-01-10 00:02:15 +00001497
1498 mlx4_0 hca_handle=1 hca_object=20
1499 ocrdma1 hca_handle=1 hca_object=23
1500
1501
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001502Misc
1503----
Tejun Heo63f1ca52017-02-02 13:50:35 -05001504
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001505perf_event
1506~~~~~~~~~~
Tejun Heo968ebff2017-01-29 14:35:20 -05001507
1508perf_event controller, if not mounted on a legacy hierarchy, is
1509automatically enabled on the v2 hierarchy so that perf events can
1510always be filtered by cgroup v2 path. The controller can still be
1511moved to a legacy hierarchy after v2 hierarchy is populated.
1512
1513
Maciej S. Szmigieroc4e08422018-01-10 23:33:19 +01001514Non-normative information
1515-------------------------
1516
1517This section contains information that isn't considered to be a part of
1518the stable kernel API and so is subject to change.
1519
1520
1521CPU controller root cgroup process behaviour
1522~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1523
1524When distributing CPU cycles in the root cgroup each thread in this
1525cgroup is treated as if it was hosted in a separate child cgroup of the
1526root cgroup. This child cgroup weight is dependent on its thread nice
1527level.
1528
1529For details of this mapping see sched_prio_to_weight array in
1530kernel/sched/core.c file (values from this array should be scaled
1531appropriately so the neutral - nice 0 - value is 100 instead of 1024).
1532
1533
1534IO controller root cgroup process behaviour
1535~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1536
1537Root cgroup processes are hosted in an implicit leaf child node.
1538When distributing IO resources this implicit child node is taken into
1539account as if it was a normal child cgroup of the root cgroup with a
1540weight value of 200.
1541
1542
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001543Namespace
1544=========
Serge Hallynd4021f62016-01-29 02:54:10 -06001545
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001546Basics
1547------
Serge Hallynd4021f62016-01-29 02:54:10 -06001548
1549cgroup namespace provides a mechanism to virtualize the view of the
1550"/proc/$PID/cgroup" file and cgroup mounts. The CLONE_NEWCGROUP clone
1551flag can be used with clone(2) and unshare(2) to create a new cgroup
1552namespace. The process running inside the cgroup namespace will have
1553its "/proc/$PID/cgroup" output restricted to cgroupns root. The
1554cgroupns root is the cgroup of the process at the time of creation of
1555the cgroup namespace.
1556
1557Without cgroup namespace, the "/proc/$PID/cgroup" file shows the
1558complete path of the cgroup of a process. In a container setup where
1559a set of cgroups and namespaces are intended to isolate processes the
1560"/proc/$PID/cgroup" file may leak potential system level information
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001561to the isolated processes. For Example::
Serge Hallynd4021f62016-01-29 02:54:10 -06001562
1563 # cat /proc/self/cgroup
1564 0::/batchjobs/container_id1
1565
1566The path '/batchjobs/container_id1' can be considered as system-data
1567and undesirable to expose to the isolated processes. cgroup namespace
1568can be used to restrict visibility of this path. For example, before
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001569creating a cgroup namespace, one would see::
Serge Hallynd4021f62016-01-29 02:54:10 -06001570
1571 # ls -l /proc/self/ns/cgroup
1572 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 2014-07-15 10:37 /proc/self/ns/cgroup -> cgroup:[4026531835]
1573 # cat /proc/self/cgroup
1574 0::/batchjobs/container_id1
1575
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001576After unsharing a new namespace, the view changes::
Serge Hallynd4021f62016-01-29 02:54:10 -06001577
1578 # ls -l /proc/self/ns/cgroup
1579 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 2014-07-15 10:35 /proc/self/ns/cgroup -> cgroup:[4026532183]
1580 # cat /proc/self/cgroup
1581 0::/
1582
1583When some thread from a multi-threaded process unshares its cgroup
1584namespace, the new cgroupns gets applied to the entire process (all
1585the threads). This is natural for the v2 hierarchy; however, for the
1586legacy hierarchies, this may be unexpected.
1587
1588A cgroup namespace is alive as long as there are processes inside or
1589mounts pinning it. When the last usage goes away, the cgroup
1590namespace is destroyed. The cgroupns root and the actual cgroups
1591remain.
1592
1593
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001594The Root and Views
1595------------------
Serge Hallynd4021f62016-01-29 02:54:10 -06001596
1597The 'cgroupns root' for a cgroup namespace is the cgroup in which the
1598process calling unshare(2) is running. For example, if a process in
1599/batchjobs/container_id1 cgroup calls unshare, cgroup
1600/batchjobs/container_id1 becomes the cgroupns root. For the
1601init_cgroup_ns, this is the real root ('/') cgroup.
1602
1603The cgroupns root cgroup does not change even if the namespace creator
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001604process later moves to a different cgroup::
Serge Hallynd4021f62016-01-29 02:54:10 -06001605
1606 # ~/unshare -c # unshare cgroupns in some cgroup
1607 # cat /proc/self/cgroup
1608 0::/
1609 # mkdir sub_cgrp_1
1610 # echo 0 > sub_cgrp_1/cgroup.procs
1611 # cat /proc/self/cgroup
1612 0::/sub_cgrp_1
1613
1614Each process gets its namespace-specific view of "/proc/$PID/cgroup"
1615
1616Processes running inside the cgroup namespace will be able to see
1617cgroup paths (in /proc/self/cgroup) only inside their root cgroup.
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001618From within an unshared cgroupns::
Serge Hallynd4021f62016-01-29 02:54:10 -06001619
1620 # sleep 100000 &
1621 [1] 7353
1622 # echo 7353 > sub_cgrp_1/cgroup.procs
1623 # cat /proc/7353/cgroup
1624 0::/sub_cgrp_1
1625
1626From the initial cgroup namespace, the real cgroup path will be
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001627visible::
Serge Hallynd4021f62016-01-29 02:54:10 -06001628
1629 $ cat /proc/7353/cgroup
1630 0::/batchjobs/container_id1/sub_cgrp_1
1631
1632From a sibling cgroup namespace (that is, a namespace rooted at a
1633different cgroup), the cgroup path relative to its own cgroup
1634namespace root will be shown. For instance, if PID 7353's cgroup
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001635namespace root is at '/batchjobs/container_id2', then it will see::
Serge Hallynd4021f62016-01-29 02:54:10 -06001636
1637 # cat /proc/7353/cgroup
1638 0::/../container_id2/sub_cgrp_1
1639
1640Note that the relative path always starts with '/' to indicate that
1641its relative to the cgroup namespace root of the caller.
1642
1643
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001644Migration and setns(2)
1645----------------------
Serge Hallynd4021f62016-01-29 02:54:10 -06001646
1647Processes inside a cgroup namespace can move into and out of the
1648namespace root if they have proper access to external cgroups. For
1649example, from inside a namespace with cgroupns root at
1650/batchjobs/container_id1, and assuming that the global hierarchy is
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001651still accessible inside cgroupns::
Serge Hallynd4021f62016-01-29 02:54:10 -06001652
1653 # cat /proc/7353/cgroup
1654 0::/sub_cgrp_1
1655 # echo 7353 > batchjobs/container_id2/cgroup.procs
1656 # cat /proc/7353/cgroup
1657 0::/../container_id2
1658
1659Note that this kind of setup is not encouraged. A task inside cgroup
1660namespace should only be exposed to its own cgroupns hierarchy.
1661
1662setns(2) to another cgroup namespace is allowed when:
1663
1664(a) the process has CAP_SYS_ADMIN against its current user namespace
1665(b) the process has CAP_SYS_ADMIN against the target cgroup
1666 namespace's userns
1667
1668No implicit cgroup changes happen with attaching to another cgroup
1669namespace. It is expected that the someone moves the attaching
1670process under the target cgroup namespace root.
1671
1672
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001673Interaction with Other Namespaces
1674---------------------------------
Serge Hallynd4021f62016-01-29 02:54:10 -06001675
1676Namespace specific cgroup hierarchy can be mounted by a process
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001677running inside a non-init cgroup namespace::
Serge Hallynd4021f62016-01-29 02:54:10 -06001678
1679 # mount -t cgroup2 none $MOUNT_POINT
1680
1681This will mount the unified cgroup hierarchy with cgroupns root as the
1682filesystem root. The process needs CAP_SYS_ADMIN against its user and
1683mount namespaces.
1684
1685The virtualization of /proc/self/cgroup file combined with restricting
1686the view of cgroup hierarchy by namespace-private cgroupfs mount
1687provides a properly isolated cgroup view inside the container.
1688
1689
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001690Information on Kernel Programming
1691=================================
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001692
1693This section contains kernel programming information in the areas
1694where interacting with cgroup is necessary. cgroup core and
1695controllers are not covered.
1696
1697
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001698Filesystem Support for Writeback
1699--------------------------------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001700
1701A filesystem can support cgroup writeback by updating
1702address_space_operations->writepage[s]() to annotate bio's using the
1703following two functions.
1704
1705 wbc_init_bio(@wbc, @bio)
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001706 Should be called for each bio carrying writeback data and
1707 associates the bio with the inode's owner cgroup. Can be
1708 called anytime between bio allocation and submission.
1709
1710 wbc_account_io(@wbc, @page, @bytes)
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001711 Should be called for each data segment being written out.
1712 While this function doesn't care exactly when it's called
1713 during the writeback session, it's the easiest and most
1714 natural to call it as data segments are added to a bio.
1715
1716With writeback bio's annotated, cgroup support can be enabled per
1717super_block by setting SB_I_CGROUPWB in ->s_iflags. This allows for
1718selective disabling of cgroup writeback support which is helpful when
1719certain filesystem features, e.g. journaled data mode, are
1720incompatible.
1721
1722wbc_init_bio() binds the specified bio to its cgroup. Depending on
1723the configuration, the bio may be executed at a lower priority and if
1724the writeback session is holding shared resources, e.g. a journal
1725entry, may lead to priority inversion. There is no one easy solution
1726for the problem. Filesystems can try to work around specific problem
1727cases by skipping wbc_init_bio() or using bio_associate_blkcg()
1728directly.
1729
1730
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001731Deprecated v1 Core Features
1732===========================
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001733
1734- Multiple hierarchies including named ones are not supported.
1735
Tejun Heo5136f632017-06-27 14:30:28 -04001736- All v1 mount options are not supported.
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001737
1738- The "tasks" file is removed and "cgroup.procs" is not sorted.
1739
1740- "cgroup.clone_children" is removed.
1741
1742- /proc/cgroups is meaningless for v2. Use "cgroup.controllers" file
1743 at the root instead.
1744
1745
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001746Issues with v1 and Rationales for v2
1747====================================
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001748
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001749Multiple Hierarchies
1750--------------------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001751
1752cgroup v1 allowed an arbitrary number of hierarchies and each
1753hierarchy could host any number of controllers. While this seemed to
1754provide a high level of flexibility, it wasn't useful in practice.
1755
1756For example, as there is only one instance of each controller, utility
1757type controllers such as freezer which can be useful in all
1758hierarchies could only be used in one. The issue is exacerbated by
1759the fact that controllers couldn't be moved to another hierarchy once
1760hierarchies were populated. Another issue was that all controllers
1761bound to a hierarchy were forced to have exactly the same view of the
1762hierarchy. It wasn't possible to vary the granularity depending on
1763the specific controller.
1764
1765In practice, these issues heavily limited which controllers could be
1766put on the same hierarchy and most configurations resorted to putting
1767each controller on its own hierarchy. Only closely related ones, such
1768as the cpu and cpuacct controllers, made sense to be put on the same
1769hierarchy. This often meant that userland ended up managing multiple
1770similar hierarchies repeating the same steps on each hierarchy
1771whenever a hierarchy management operation was necessary.
1772
1773Furthermore, support for multiple hierarchies came at a steep cost.
1774It greatly complicated cgroup core implementation but more importantly
1775the support for multiple hierarchies restricted how cgroup could be
1776used in general and what controllers was able to do.
1777
1778There was no limit on how many hierarchies there might be, which meant
1779that a thread's cgroup membership couldn't be described in finite
1780length. The key might contain any number of entries and was unlimited
1781in length, which made it highly awkward to manipulate and led to
1782addition of controllers which existed only to identify membership,
1783which in turn exacerbated the original problem of proliferating number
1784of hierarchies.
1785
1786Also, as a controller couldn't have any expectation regarding the
1787topologies of hierarchies other controllers might be on, each
1788controller had to assume that all other controllers were attached to
1789completely orthogonal hierarchies. This made it impossible, or at
1790least very cumbersome, for controllers to cooperate with each other.
1791
1792In most use cases, putting controllers on hierarchies which are
1793completely orthogonal to each other isn't necessary. What usually is
1794called for is the ability to have differing levels of granularity
1795depending on the specific controller. In other words, hierarchy may
1796be collapsed from leaf towards root when viewed from specific
1797controllers. For example, a given configuration might not care about
1798how memory is distributed beyond a certain level while still wanting
1799to control how CPU cycles are distributed.
1800
1801
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001802Thread Granularity
1803------------------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001804
1805cgroup v1 allowed threads of a process to belong to different cgroups.
1806This didn't make sense for some controllers and those controllers
1807ended up implementing different ways to ignore such situations but
1808much more importantly it blurred the line between API exposed to
1809individual applications and system management interface.
1810
1811Generally, in-process knowledge is available only to the process
1812itself; thus, unlike service-level organization of processes,
1813categorizing threads of a process requires active participation from
1814the application which owns the target process.
1815
1816cgroup v1 had an ambiguously defined delegation model which got abused
1817in combination with thread granularity. cgroups were delegated to
1818individual applications so that they can create and manage their own
1819sub-hierarchies and control resource distributions along them. This
1820effectively raised cgroup to the status of a syscall-like API exposed
1821to lay programs.
1822
1823First of all, cgroup has a fundamentally inadequate interface to be
1824exposed this way. For a process to access its own knobs, it has to
1825extract the path on the target hierarchy from /proc/self/cgroup,
1826construct the path by appending the name of the knob to the path, open
1827and then read and/or write to it. This is not only extremely clunky
1828and unusual but also inherently racy. There is no conventional way to
1829define transaction across the required steps and nothing can guarantee
1830that the process would actually be operating on its own sub-hierarchy.
1831
1832cgroup controllers implemented a number of knobs which would never be
1833accepted as public APIs because they were just adding control knobs to
1834system-management pseudo filesystem. cgroup ended up with interface
1835knobs which were not properly abstracted or refined and directly
1836revealed kernel internal details. These knobs got exposed to
1837individual applications through the ill-defined delegation mechanism
1838effectively abusing cgroup as a shortcut to implementing public APIs
1839without going through the required scrutiny.
1840
1841This was painful for both userland and kernel. Userland ended up with
1842misbehaving and poorly abstracted interfaces and kernel exposing and
1843locked into constructs inadvertently.
1844
1845
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001846Competition Between Inner Nodes and Threads
1847-------------------------------------------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001848
1849cgroup v1 allowed threads to be in any cgroups which created an
1850interesting problem where threads belonging to a parent cgroup and its
1851children cgroups competed for resources. This was nasty as two
1852different types of entities competed and there was no obvious way to
1853settle it. Different controllers did different things.
1854
1855The cpu controller considered threads and cgroups as equivalents and
1856mapped nice levels to cgroup weights. This worked for some cases but
1857fell flat when children wanted to be allocated specific ratios of CPU
1858cycles and the number of internal threads fluctuated - the ratios
1859constantly changed as the number of competing entities fluctuated.
1860There also were other issues. The mapping from nice level to weight
1861wasn't obvious or universal, and there were various other knobs which
1862simply weren't available for threads.
1863
1864The io controller implicitly created a hidden leaf node for each
1865cgroup to host the threads. The hidden leaf had its own copies of all
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001866the knobs with ``leaf_`` prefixed. While this allowed equivalent
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001867control over internal threads, it was with serious drawbacks. It
1868always added an extra layer of nesting which wouldn't be necessary
1869otherwise, made the interface messy and significantly complicated the
1870implementation.
1871
1872The memory controller didn't have a way to control what happened
1873between internal tasks and child cgroups and the behavior was not
1874clearly defined. There were attempts to add ad-hoc behaviors and
1875knobs to tailor the behavior to specific workloads which would have
1876led to problems extremely difficult to resolve in the long term.
1877
1878Multiple controllers struggled with internal tasks and came up with
1879different ways to deal with it; unfortunately, all the approaches were
1880severely flawed and, furthermore, the widely different behaviors
1881made cgroup as a whole highly inconsistent.
1882
1883This clearly is a problem which needs to be addressed from cgroup core
1884in a uniform way.
1885
1886
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001887Other Interface Issues
1888----------------------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001889
1890cgroup v1 grew without oversight and developed a large number of
1891idiosyncrasies and inconsistencies. One issue on the cgroup core side
1892was how an empty cgroup was notified - a userland helper binary was
1893forked and executed for each event. The event delivery wasn't
1894recursive or delegatable. The limitations of the mechanism also led
1895to in-kernel event delivery filtering mechanism further complicating
1896the interface.
1897
1898Controller interfaces were problematic too. An extreme example is
1899controllers completely ignoring hierarchical organization and treating
1900all cgroups as if they were all located directly under the root
1901cgroup. Some controllers exposed a large amount of inconsistent
1902implementation details to userland.
1903
1904There also was no consistency across controllers. When a new cgroup
1905was created, some controllers defaulted to not imposing extra
1906restrictions while others disallowed any resource usage until
1907explicitly configured. Configuration knobs for the same type of
1908control used widely differing naming schemes and formats. Statistics
1909and information knobs were named arbitrarily and used different
1910formats and units even in the same controller.
1911
1912cgroup v2 establishes common conventions where appropriate and updates
1913controllers so that they expose minimal and consistent interfaces.
1914
1915
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001916Controller Issues and Remedies
1917------------------------------
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001918
Mauro Carvalho Chehab633b11b2017-05-14 08:48:40 -03001919Memory
1920~~~~~~
Tejun Heo6c292092015-11-16 11:13:34 -05001921
1922The original lower boundary, the soft limit, is defined as a limit
1923that is per default unset. As a result, the set of cgroups that
1924global reclaim prefers is opt-in, rather than opt-out. The costs for
1925optimizing these mostly negative lookups are so high that the
1926implementation, despite its enormous size, does not even provide the
1927basic desirable behavior. First off, the soft limit has no
1928hierarchical meaning. All configured groups are organized in a global
1929rbtree and treated like equal peers, regardless where they are located
1930in the hierarchy. This makes subtree delegation impossible. Second,
1931the soft limit reclaim pass is so aggressive that it not just
1932introduces high allocation latencies into the system, but also impacts
1933system performance due to overreclaim, to the point where the feature
1934becomes self-defeating.
1935
1936The memory.low boundary on the other hand is a top-down allocated
1937reserve. A cgroup enjoys reclaim protection when it and all its
1938ancestors are below their low boundaries, which makes delegation of
1939subtrees possible. Secondly, new cgroups have no reserve per default
1940and in the common case most cgroups are eligible for the preferred
1941reclaim pass. This allows the new low boundary to be efficiently
1942implemented with just a minor addition to the generic reclaim code,
1943without the need for out-of-band data structures and reclaim passes.
1944Because the generic reclaim code considers all cgroups except for the
1945ones running low in the preferred first reclaim pass, overreclaim of
1946individual groups is eliminated as well, resulting in much better
1947overall workload performance.
1948
1949The original high boundary, the hard limit, is defined as a strict
1950limit that can not budge, even if the OOM killer has to be called.
1951But this generally goes against the goal of making the most out of the
1952available memory. The memory consumption of workloads varies during
1953runtime, and that requires users to overcommit. But doing that with a
1954strict upper limit requires either a fairly accurate prediction of the
1955working set size or adding slack to the limit. Since working set size
1956estimation is hard and error prone, and getting it wrong results in
1957OOM kills, most users tend to err on the side of a looser limit and
1958end up wasting precious resources.
1959
1960The memory.high boundary on the other hand can be set much more
1961conservatively. When hit, it throttles allocations by forcing them
1962into direct reclaim to work off the excess, but it never invokes the
1963OOM killer. As a result, a high boundary that is chosen too
1964aggressively will not terminate the processes, but instead it will
1965lead to gradual performance degradation. The user can monitor this
1966and make corrections until the minimal memory footprint that still
1967gives acceptable performance is found.
1968
1969In extreme cases, with many concurrent allocations and a complete
1970breakdown of reclaim progress within the group, the high boundary can
1971be exceeded. But even then it's mostly better to satisfy the
1972allocation from the slack available in other groups or the rest of the
1973system than killing the group. Otherwise, memory.max is there to
1974limit this type of spillover and ultimately contain buggy or even
1975malicious applications.
Vladimir Davydov3e24b192016-01-20 15:03:13 -08001976
Johannes Weinerb6e6edc2016-03-17 14:20:28 -07001977Setting the original memory.limit_in_bytes below the current usage was
1978subject to a race condition, where concurrent charges could cause the
1979limit setting to fail. memory.max on the other hand will first set the
1980limit to prevent new charges, and then reclaim and OOM kill until the
1981new limit is met - or the task writing to memory.max is killed.
1982
Vladimir Davydov3e24b192016-01-20 15:03:13 -08001983The combined memory+swap accounting and limiting is replaced by real
1984control over swap space.
1985
1986The main argument for a combined memory+swap facility in the original
1987cgroup design was that global or parental pressure would always be
1988able to swap all anonymous memory of a child group, regardless of the
1989child's own (possibly untrusted) configuration. However, untrusted
1990groups can sabotage swapping by other means - such as referencing its
1991anonymous memory in a tight loop - and an admin can not assume full
1992swappability when overcommitting untrusted jobs.
1993
1994For trusted jobs, on the other hand, a combined counter is not an
1995intuitive userspace interface, and it flies in the face of the idea
1996that cgroup controllers should account and limit specific physical
1997resources. Swap space is a resource like all others in the system,
1998and that's why unified hierarchy allows distributing it separately.