| Kernel level exception handling in Linux 2.1.8 |
| Commentary by Joerg Pommnitz <joerg@raleigh.ibm.com> |
| |
| When a process runs in kernel mode, it often has to access user |
| mode memory whose address has been passed by an untrusted program. |
| To protect itself the kernel has to verify this address. |
| |
| In older versions of Linux this was done with the |
| int verify_area(int type, const void * addr, unsigned long size) |
| function. |
| |
| This function verified that the memory area starting at address |
| addr and of size size was accessible for the operation specified |
| in type (read or write). To do this, verify_read had to look up the |
| virtual memory area (vma) that contained the address addr. In the |
| normal case (correctly working program), this test was successful. |
| It only failed for a few buggy programs. In some kernel profiling |
| tests, this normally unneeded verification used up a considerable |
| amount of time. |
| |
| To overcome this situation, Linus decided to let the virtual memory |
| hardware present in every Linux-capable CPU handle this test. |
| |
| How does this work? |
| |
| Whenever the kernel tries to access an address that is currently not |
| accessible, the CPU generates a page fault exception and calls the |
| page fault handler |
| |
| void do_page_fault(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long error_code) |
| |
| in arch/i386/mm/fault.c. The parameters on the stack are set up by |
| the low level assembly glue in arch/i386/kernel/entry.S. The parameter |
| regs is a pointer to the saved registers on the stack, error_code |
| contains a reason code for the exception. |
| |
| do_page_fault first obtains the unaccessible address from the CPU |
| control register CR2. If the address is within the virtual address |
| space of the process, the fault probably occurred, because the page |
| was not swapped in, write protected or something similar. However, |
| we are interested in the other case: the address is not valid, there |
| is no vma that contains this address. In this case, the kernel jumps |
| to the bad_area label. |
| |
| There it uses the address of the instruction that caused the exception |
| (i.e. regs->eip) to find an address where the execution can continue |
| (fixup). If this search is successful, the fault handler modifies the |
| return address (again regs->eip) and returns. The execution will |
| continue at the address in fixup. |
| |
| Where does fixup point to? |
| |
| Since we jump to the contents of fixup, fixup obviously points |
| to executable code. This code is hidden inside the user access macros. |
| I have picked the get_user macro defined in include/asm/uaccess.h as an |
| example. The definition is somewhat hard to follow, so let's peek at |
| the code generated by the preprocessor and the compiler. I selected |
| the get_user call in drivers/char/console.c for a detailed examination. |
| |
| The original code in console.c line 1405: |
| get_user(c, buf); |
| |
| The preprocessor output (edited to become somewhat readable): |
| |
| ( |
| { |
| long __gu_err = - 14 , __gu_val = 0; |
| const __typeof__(*( ( buf ) )) *__gu_addr = ((buf)); |
| if (((((0 + current_set[0])->tss.segment) == 0x18 ) || |
| (((sizeof(*(buf))) <= 0xC0000000UL) && |
| ((unsigned long)(__gu_addr ) <= 0xC0000000UL - (sizeof(*(buf))))))) |
| do { |
| __gu_err = 0; |
| switch ((sizeof(*(buf)))) { |
| case 1: |
| __asm__ __volatile__( |
| "1: mov" "b" " %2,%" "b" "1\n" |
| "2:\n" |
| ".section .fixup,\"ax\"\n" |
| "3: movl %3,%0\n" |
| " xor" "b" " %" "b" "1,%" "b" "1\n" |
| " jmp 2b\n" |
| ".section __ex_table,\"a\"\n" |
| " .align 4\n" |
| " .long 1b,3b\n" |
| ".text" : "=r"(__gu_err), "=q" (__gu_val): "m"((*(struct __large_struct *) |
| ( __gu_addr )) ), "i"(- 14 ), "0"( __gu_err )) ; |
| break; |
| case 2: |
| __asm__ __volatile__( |
| "1: mov" "w" " %2,%" "w" "1\n" |
| "2:\n" |
| ".section .fixup,\"ax\"\n" |
| "3: movl %3,%0\n" |
| " xor" "w" " %" "w" "1,%" "w" "1\n" |
| " jmp 2b\n" |
| ".section __ex_table,\"a\"\n" |
| " .align 4\n" |
| " .long 1b,3b\n" |
| ".text" : "=r"(__gu_err), "=r" (__gu_val) : "m"((*(struct __large_struct *) |
| ( __gu_addr )) ), "i"(- 14 ), "0"( __gu_err )); |
| break; |
| case 4: |
| __asm__ __volatile__( |
| "1: mov" "l" " %2,%" "" "1\n" |
| "2:\n" |
| ".section .fixup,\"ax\"\n" |
| "3: movl %3,%0\n" |
| " xor" "l" " %" "" "1,%" "" "1\n" |
| " jmp 2b\n" |
| ".section __ex_table,\"a\"\n" |
| " .align 4\n" " .long 1b,3b\n" |
| ".text" : "=r"(__gu_err), "=r" (__gu_val) : "m"((*(struct __large_struct *) |
| ( __gu_addr )) ), "i"(- 14 ), "0"(__gu_err)); |
| break; |
| default: |
| (__gu_val) = __get_user_bad(); |
| } |
| } while (0) ; |
| ((c)) = (__typeof__(*((buf))))__gu_val; |
| __gu_err; |
| } |
| ); |
| |
| WOW! Black GCC/assembly magic. This is impossible to follow, so let's |
| see what code gcc generates: |
| |
| > xorl %edx,%edx |
| > movl current_set,%eax |
| > cmpl $24,788(%eax) |
| > je .L1424 |
| > cmpl $-1073741825,64(%esp) |
| > ja .L1423 |
| > .L1424: |
| > movl %edx,%eax |
| > movl 64(%esp),%ebx |
| > #APP |
| > 1: movb (%ebx),%dl /* this is the actual user access */ |
| > 2: |
| > .section .fixup,"ax" |
| > 3: movl $-14,%eax |
| > xorb %dl,%dl |
| > jmp 2b |
| > .section __ex_table,"a" |
| > .align 4 |
| > .long 1b,3b |
| > .text |
| > #NO_APP |
| > .L1423: |
| > movzbl %dl,%esi |
| |
| The optimizer does a good job and gives us something we can actually |
| understand. Can we? The actual user access is quite obvious. Thanks |
| to the unified address space we can just access the address in user |
| memory. But what does the .section stuff do????? |
| |
| To understand this we have to look at the final kernel: |
| |
| > objdump --section-headers vmlinux |
| > |
| > vmlinux: file format elf32-i386 |
| > |
| > Sections: |
| > Idx Name Size VMA LMA File off Algn |
| > 0 .text 00098f40 c0100000 c0100000 00001000 2**4 |
| > CONTENTS, ALLOC, LOAD, READONLY, CODE |
| > 1 .fixup 000016bc c0198f40 c0198f40 00099f40 2**0 |
| > CONTENTS, ALLOC, LOAD, READONLY, CODE |
| > 2 .rodata 0000f127 c019a5fc c019a5fc 0009b5fc 2**2 |
| > CONTENTS, ALLOC, LOAD, READONLY, DATA |
| > 3 __ex_table 000015c0 c01a9724 c01a9724 000aa724 2**2 |
| > CONTENTS, ALLOC, LOAD, READONLY, DATA |
| > 4 .data 0000ea58 c01abcf0 c01abcf0 000abcf0 2**4 |
| > CONTENTS, ALLOC, LOAD, DATA |
| > 5 .bss 00018e21 c01ba748 c01ba748 000ba748 2**2 |
| > ALLOC |
| > 6 .comment 00000ec4 00000000 00000000 000ba748 2**0 |
| > CONTENTS, READONLY |
| > 7 .note 00001068 00000ec4 00000ec4 000bb60c 2**0 |
| > CONTENTS, READONLY |
| |
| There are obviously 2 non standard ELF sections in the generated object |
| file. But first we want to find out what happened to our code in the |
| final kernel executable: |
| |
| > objdump --disassemble --section=.text vmlinux |
| > |
| > c017e785 <do_con_write+c1> xorl %edx,%edx |
| > c017e787 <do_con_write+c3> movl 0xc01c7bec,%eax |
| > c017e78c <do_con_write+c8> cmpl $0x18,0x314(%eax) |
| > c017e793 <do_con_write+cf> je c017e79f <do_con_write+db> |
| > c017e795 <do_con_write+d1> cmpl $0xbfffffff,0x40(%esp,1) |
| > c017e79d <do_con_write+d9> ja c017e7a7 <do_con_write+e3> |
| > c017e79f <do_con_write+db> movl %edx,%eax |
| > c017e7a1 <do_con_write+dd> movl 0x40(%esp,1),%ebx |
| > c017e7a5 <do_con_write+e1> movb (%ebx),%dl |
| > c017e7a7 <do_con_write+e3> movzbl %dl,%esi |
| |
| The whole user memory access is reduced to 10 x86 machine instructions. |
| The instructions bracketed in the .section directives are no longer |
| in the normal execution path. They are located in a different section |
| of the executable file: |
| |
| > objdump --disassemble --section=.fixup vmlinux |
| > |
| > c0199ff5 <.fixup+10b5> movl $0xfffffff2,%eax |
| > c0199ffa <.fixup+10ba> xorb %dl,%dl |
| > c0199ffc <.fixup+10bc> jmp c017e7a7 <do_con_write+e3> |
| |
| And finally: |
| > objdump --full-contents --section=__ex_table vmlinux |
| > |
| > c01aa7c4 93c017c0 e09f19c0 97c017c0 99c017c0 ................ |
| > c01aa7d4 f6c217c0 e99f19c0 a5e717c0 f59f19c0 ................ |
| > c01aa7e4 080a18c0 01a019c0 0a0a18c0 04a019c0 ................ |
| |
| or in human readable byte order: |
| |
| > c01aa7c4 c017c093 c0199fe0 c017c097 c017c099 ................ |
| > c01aa7d4 c017c2f6 c0199fe9 c017e7a5 c0199ff5 ................ |
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ |
| this is the interesting part! |
| > c01aa7e4 c0180a08 c019a001 c0180a0a c019a004 ................ |
| |
| What happened? The assembly directives |
| |
| .section .fixup,"ax" |
| .section __ex_table,"a" |
| |
| told the assembler to move the following code to the specified |
| sections in the ELF object file. So the instructions |
| 3: movl $-14,%eax |
| xorb %dl,%dl |
| jmp 2b |
| ended up in the .fixup section of the object file and the addresses |
| .long 1b,3b |
| ended up in the __ex_table section of the object file. 1b and 3b |
| are local labels. The local label 1b (1b stands for next label 1 |
| backward) is the address of the instruction that might fault, i.e. |
| in our case the address of the label 1 is c017e7a5: |
| the original assembly code: > 1: movb (%ebx),%dl |
| and linked in vmlinux : > c017e7a5 <do_con_write+e1> movb (%ebx),%dl |
| |
| The local label 3 (backwards again) is the address of the code to handle |
| the fault, in our case the actual value is c0199ff5: |
| the original assembly code: > 3: movl $-14,%eax |
| and linked in vmlinux : > c0199ff5 <.fixup+10b5> movl $0xfffffff2,%eax |
| |
| The assembly code |
| > .section __ex_table,"a" |
| > .align 4 |
| > .long 1b,3b |
| |
| becomes the value pair |
| > c01aa7d4 c017c2f6 c0199fe9 c017e7a5 c0199ff5 ................ |
| ^this is ^this is |
| 1b 3b |
| c017e7a5,c0199ff5 in the exception table of the kernel. |
| |
| So, what actually happens if a fault from kernel mode with no suitable |
| vma occurs? |
| |
| 1.) access to invalid address: |
| > c017e7a5 <do_con_write+e1> movb (%ebx),%dl |
| 2.) MMU generates exception |
| 3.) CPU calls do_page_fault |
| 4.) do page fault calls search_exception_table (regs->eip == c017e7a5); |
| 5.) search_exception_table looks up the address c017e7a5 in the |
| exception table (i.e. the contents of the ELF section __ex_table) |
| and returns the address of the associated fault handle code c0199ff5. |
| 6.) do_page_fault modifies its own return address to point to the fault |
| handle code and returns. |
| 7.) execution continues in the fault handling code. |
| 8.) 8a) EAX becomes -EFAULT (== -14) |
| 8b) DL becomes zero (the value we "read" from user space) |
| 8c) execution continues at local label 2 (address of the |
| instruction immediately after the faulting user access). |
| |
| The steps 8a to 8c in a certain way emulate the faulting instruction. |
| |
| That's it, mostly. If you look at our example, you might ask why |
| we set EAX to -EFAULT in the exception handler code. Well, the |
| get_user macro actually returns a value: 0, if the user access was |
| successful, -EFAULT on failure. Our original code did not test this |
| return value, however the inline assembly code in get_user tries to |
| return -EFAULT. GCC selected EAX to return this value. |
| |
| NOTE: |
| Due to the way that the exception table is built and needs to be ordered, |
| only use exceptions for code in the .text section. Any other section |
| will cause the exception table to not be sorted correctly, and the |
| exceptions will fail. |