Linus Torvalds | 1da177e | 2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 1 | #include <linux/compiler.h> |
| 2 | #include <linux/mm.h> |
| 3 | #include <linux/signal.h> |
| 4 | #include <linux/smp.h> |
| 5 | #include <linux/smp_lock.h> |
| 6 | |
| 7 | #include <asm/asm.h> |
| 8 | #include <asm/bootinfo.h> |
| 9 | #include <asm/byteorder.h> |
| 10 | #include <asm/cpu.h> |
| 11 | #include <asm/inst.h> |
| 12 | #include <asm/processor.h> |
| 13 | #include <asm/uaccess.h> |
| 14 | #include <asm/branch.h> |
| 15 | #include <asm/mipsregs.h> |
| 16 | #include <asm/system.h> |
| 17 | #include <asm/cacheflush.h> |
| 18 | |
| 19 | #include <asm/fpu_emulator.h> |
| 20 | |
| 21 | #include "ieee754.h" |
| 22 | #include "dsemul.h" |
| 23 | |
| 24 | /* Strap kernel emulator for full MIPS IV emulation */ |
| 25 | |
| 26 | #ifdef __mips |
| 27 | #undef __mips |
| 28 | #endif |
| 29 | #define __mips 4 |
| 30 | |
Linus Torvalds | 1da177e | 2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 31 | /* |
| 32 | * Emulate the arbritrary instruction ir at xcp->cp0_epc. Required when |
| 33 | * we have to emulate the instruction in a COP1 branch delay slot. Do |
| 34 | * not change cp0_epc due to the instruction |
| 35 | * |
| 36 | * According to the spec: |
| 37 | * 1) it shouldnt be a branch :-) |
| 38 | * 2) it can be a COP instruction :-( |
| 39 | * 3) if we are tring to run a protected memory space we must take |
| 40 | * special care on memory access instructions :-( |
| 41 | */ |
| 42 | |
| 43 | /* |
| 44 | * "Trampoline" return routine to catch exception following |
| 45 | * execution of delay-slot instruction execution. |
| 46 | */ |
| 47 | |
| 48 | struct emuframe { |
| 49 | mips_instruction emul; |
| 50 | mips_instruction badinst; |
| 51 | mips_instruction cookie; |
Ralf Baechle | 333d1f6 | 2005-02-28 17:55:57 +0000 | [diff] [blame^] | 52 | unsigned long epc; |
Linus Torvalds | 1da177e | 2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 53 | }; |
| 54 | |
Ralf Baechle | 333d1f6 | 2005-02-28 17:55:57 +0000 | [diff] [blame^] | 55 | int mips_dsemul(struct pt_regs *regs, mips_instruction ir, unsigned long cpc) |
Linus Torvalds | 1da177e | 2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 56 | { |
| 57 | extern asmlinkage void handle_dsemulret(void); |
| 58 | mips_instruction *dsemul_insns; |
| 59 | struct emuframe *fr; |
| 60 | int err; |
| 61 | |
| 62 | if (ir == 0) { /* a nop is easy */ |
| 63 | regs->cp0_epc = cpc; |
| 64 | regs->cp0_cause &= ~CAUSEF_BD; |
| 65 | return 0; |
| 66 | } |
| 67 | #ifdef DSEMUL_TRACE |
| 68 | printk("dsemul %lx %lx\n", regs->cp0_epc, cpc); |
| 69 | |
| 70 | #endif |
| 71 | |
| 72 | /* |
| 73 | * The strategy is to push the instruction onto the user stack |
| 74 | * and put a trap after it which we can catch and jump to |
| 75 | * the required address any alternative apart from full |
| 76 | * instruction emulation!!. |
| 77 | * |
| 78 | * Algorithmics used a system call instruction, and |
| 79 | * borrowed that vector. MIPS/Linux version is a bit |
| 80 | * more heavyweight in the interests of portability and |
| 81 | * multiprocessor support. For Linux we generate a |
| 82 | * an unaligned access and force an address error exception. |
| 83 | * |
| 84 | * For embedded systems (stand-alone) we prefer to use a |
| 85 | * non-existing CP1 instruction. This prevents us from emulating |
| 86 | * branches, but gives us a cleaner interface to the exception |
| 87 | * handler (single entry point). |
| 88 | */ |
| 89 | |
| 90 | /* Ensure that the two instructions are in the same cache line */ |
Ralf Baechle | 333d1f6 | 2005-02-28 17:55:57 +0000 | [diff] [blame^] | 91 | dsemul_insns = (mips_instruction *) ((regs->regs[29] - sizeof(struct emuframe)) & ~0x7); |
Linus Torvalds | 1da177e | 2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 92 | fr = (struct emuframe *) dsemul_insns; |
| 93 | |
| 94 | /* Verify that the stack pointer is not competely insane */ |
| 95 | if (unlikely(!access_ok(VERIFY_WRITE, fr, sizeof(struct emuframe)))) |
| 96 | return SIGBUS; |
| 97 | |
| 98 | err = __put_user(ir, &fr->emul); |
| 99 | err |= __put_user((mips_instruction)BADINST, &fr->badinst); |
| 100 | err |= __put_user((mips_instruction)BD_COOKIE, &fr->cookie); |
| 101 | err |= __put_user(cpc, &fr->epc); |
| 102 | |
| 103 | if (unlikely(err)) { |
| 104 | fpuemuprivate.stats.errors++; |
| 105 | return SIGBUS; |
| 106 | } |
| 107 | |
Ralf Baechle | 333d1f6 | 2005-02-28 17:55:57 +0000 | [diff] [blame^] | 108 | regs->cp0_epc = (unsigned long) &fr->emul; |
Linus Torvalds | 1da177e | 2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 109 | |
| 110 | flush_cache_sigtramp((unsigned long)&fr->badinst); |
| 111 | |
| 112 | return SIGILL; /* force out of emulation loop */ |
| 113 | } |
| 114 | |
| 115 | int do_dsemulret(struct pt_regs *xcp) |
| 116 | { |
| 117 | struct emuframe *fr; |
Ralf Baechle | 333d1f6 | 2005-02-28 17:55:57 +0000 | [diff] [blame^] | 118 | unsigned long epc; |
Linus Torvalds | 1da177e | 2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 119 | u32 insn, cookie; |
| 120 | int err = 0; |
| 121 | |
| 122 | fr = (struct emuframe *) (xcp->cp0_epc - sizeof(mips_instruction)); |
| 123 | |
| 124 | /* |
| 125 | * If we can't even access the area, something is very wrong, but we'll |
| 126 | * leave that to the default handling |
| 127 | */ |
| 128 | if (!access_ok(VERIFY_READ, fr, sizeof(struct emuframe))) |
| 129 | return 0; |
| 130 | |
| 131 | /* |
| 132 | * Do some sanity checking on the stackframe: |
| 133 | * |
| 134 | * - Is the instruction pointed to by the EPC an BADINST? |
| 135 | * - Is the following memory word the BD_COOKIE? |
| 136 | */ |
| 137 | err = __get_user(insn, &fr->badinst); |
| 138 | err |= __get_user(cookie, &fr->cookie); |
| 139 | |
| 140 | if (unlikely(err || (insn != BADINST) || (cookie != BD_COOKIE))) { |
| 141 | fpuemuprivate.stats.errors++; |
| 142 | return 0; |
| 143 | } |
| 144 | |
| 145 | /* |
| 146 | * At this point, we are satisfied that it's a BD emulation trap. Yes, |
| 147 | * a user might have deliberately put two malformed and useless |
| 148 | * instructions in a row in his program, in which case he's in for a |
| 149 | * nasty surprise - the next instruction will be treated as a |
| 150 | * continuation address! Alas, this seems to be the only way that we |
| 151 | * can handle signals, recursion, and longjmps() in the context of |
| 152 | * emulating the branch delay instruction. |
| 153 | */ |
| 154 | |
| 155 | #ifdef DSEMUL_TRACE |
| 156 | printk("dsemulret\n"); |
| 157 | #endif |
| 158 | if (__get_user(epc, &fr->epc)) { /* Saved EPC */ |
| 159 | /* This is not a good situation to be in */ |
| 160 | force_sig(SIGBUS, current); |
| 161 | |
| 162 | return 0; |
| 163 | } |
| 164 | |
| 165 | /* Set EPC to return to post-branch instruction */ |
| 166 | xcp->cp0_epc = epc; |
| 167 | |
| 168 | return 1; |
| 169 | } |